Trochlear Dysplasia Is Associated with Increased Sagittal Tibial Tubercle Trochlear-Groove Distance in Patients with Patellar Instability.

PURPOSE: To compare the sagittal position of the tibial tubercle in relation the trochlea groove in patients with and without trochlear dysplasia (TD). METHODS: All patients between January 2017 and December 2020 with high-grade TD (Dejour type B, C and D) who underwent patellar stabilizing surgery for patellar instability at a single institution were included in the current study. Patients without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), any prior osteotomy on the affected lower extremity or cruciate ligament insufficiency were excluded. Patients who underwent knee arthroscopy for meniscal repair/debridement without any signs of TD or any of the above-mentioned criteria served as control group. Preoperative magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) was retrospectively assessed to compare common patellofemoral anatomic parameters including patellar angle, patellar tilt, patella morphology according to Wiberg, Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), PF index, trochlear sulcus angle, sulcus depth, lateral inclination angle of the trochlea, tibiofemoral rotation, TTTG and sTTTG distance, between both groups. The sTTTG is measured as the distance between the nadir point of the cartilaginous trochlear groove and the most anterior point of the tibial tubercle on an axial MRI. Independent predictors for the sTTTG were assessed for patients with TD. RESULTS: Patients with high-grade TD (n=82) showed an increased patellar tilt, CDI, trochlear sulcus angle, lateral tibiofemoral rotation angle, TTTG and sTTTG (9.16 ± 4.47 mm vs. 2.66 ± 4.21 mm) compared to the control group (n=83) (p<0.001). Patellar angle, PF index, sulcus depth and lateral inclination angle of the trochlear were significantly decreased in the TD group (p<0.001). The sTTTG was similar in all TD groups (n.s.). Among patients with TD, both tibiofemoral rotation and patellar height were independent predictors of the sTTTG (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with high-grade TD show not only abnormal values in common patellofemoral instability risk factors, but also a significantly increased sTTTG compared to patients without TD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case comparative study, III.

Increased tibial tuberosity torsion has the greatest predictive value in patients with patellofemoral instability compared to other commonly assessed parameters.

PURPOSE: The multifactorial nature of patellofemoral instability requires a comprehensive assessment of the affected patients. While an association between tibial tuberosity (TT) torsion and patellofemoral instability is known, its specific effect has not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of TT torsion on patellofemoral instability. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent surgical intervention for patellofemoral instability and asymptomatic controls. TT torsion was measured in addition to other commonly assessed risk factors for patellofemoral instability using standardised computed tomography (CT) data of the lower extremities. The diagnostic performances of the assessed parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. RESULTS: The patellofemoral instability group consisted of 79 knees, compared to 72 knees in the asymptomatic control group. Both groups differed significantly in all assessed parameters (p < 0.001), except for tibial torsion (n.s.). Among all parameters, TT torsion presented the best diagnostic performance for predicting patellar instability with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 17.7° yielded a 0.87 sensitivity and 0.89 specificity to predict patellar instability (OR, 55.2; 95% CI, 20.5-148.6; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among the evaluated risk factors, TT torsion had the highest predictive value for patellofemoral instability. Patients with TT torsions ≥ 17.7° showed a 55-fold increased probability of patellofemoral instability. Therefore, TT torsion should be included in the assessment of patients with patellofemoral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

No significant change of tibiofemoral rotation after femoral rotational osteotomy in patients with patellofemoral instability.

PURPOSE: An increased value of tibiofemoral rotation is frequently observed in patients with patellofemoral instability or maltracking. Nevertheless, the appropriate approach for addressing this parameter remains unclear so far. One potential approach for correcting tibiofemoral rotation is femoral rotational osteotomy. We hypothesized that femoral rotational osteotomy affects tibiofemoral rotation. METHODS: All patients who underwent femoral rotational osteotomy between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this study. Pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral rotation and the degree of femoral rotation were measured using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements. The effect of femoral rotation on tibiofemoral rotation was assessed. RESULTS: Forty knees (18 right and 22 left) of 36 patients (28 females and 8 males) were included. Mean preoperative femoral torsion was 32.1 ± 10.1° in 2D and 30.8 ± 10.1° in 3D. Femoral rotation was performed by -14.1 ± 8.3° using 2D measurements and -15.0 ± 8.0° using 3D measurements. Tibiofemoral rotation changed from 9.9 ± 6.2° to 9.7 ± 6.0° (p = n.s.) in 2D, and from 10.2 ± 5.5° to 9.4 ± 5.4° (p = n.s.) in 3D. CONCLUSION: Tibiofemoral rotation showed no significant changes after femoral rotational osteotomy. Hence, femoral rotational osteotomy cannot be used to correct tibiofemoral rotation in addition to correcting the femoral version. Other surgical techniques need to be evaluated if correction of tibiofemoral rotation is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The influence of the weight-bearing state on three-dimensional (3D) planning in lower extremity realignment - analysis of novel vs. state-of-the-art planning approaches.

BACKGROUND: The use of 3D planning to guide corrective osteotomies of the lower extremity is increasing in clinical practice. The use of computer-tomography (CT) data acquired in supine position neglects the weight-bearing (WB) state and the gold standard in 3D planning involves the manual adaption of the surgical plan after considering the WB state in long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, this process is subjective and dependent on the surgeons experience. A more standardized and automated method could reduce variability and decrease costs. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was (1) to compare three different three-dimensional (3D) planning modalities for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and (2) to describe the current practice of adapting NWB CT data after considering the WB state in LLR. The purpose of this study is to validate a new, standardized approach to include the WB state into the 3D planning and to compare this method against the current gold standard of 3D planning. Our hypothesis is that the correction is comparable to the gold standard, but shows less variability due compared to the more subjective hybrid approach. METHODS: Three surgical planning modalities were retrospectively analyzed in 43 legs scheduled for MOWHTO between 2015 and 2019. The planning modalities included: (1) 3D hybrid (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB) CT models after manual adaption of the opening angle considering the WB state in LLR, (2) 3D NWB (3D NWB CT models) and (3) 3D WB (2D/3D registration of 3D NWB CT models onto LLR to simulate the WB state). The pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the planned opening angle (°) were assessed and differences among modalities reported. The relationship between the reported differences and BMI, preoperative HKA (LLR), medial meniscus extrusion, Outerbridge osteoarthritis grade and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean (std) planned opening angle of 3D hybrid did not differ between 3D hybrid and 3D WB (0.4 ± 2.1°) (n.s.) but was higher in 3D hybrid compared to 3D NWB (1.1° ± 1.1°) (p = 0.039). 3D WB demonstrated increased preoperative varus deformity compared to 3D NWB: 6.7 ± 3.8° vs. 5.6 ± 2.7° (p = 0.029). Patients with an increased varus deformity in 3D WB compared to 3D NWB (> 2 °) demonstrated more extensive varus alignment in LLR (p = 0.009) and a higher JLCA (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Small intermodal differences between the current practice of the reported 3D hybrid planning modality and a 3D WB approach using a 2D/3D registration algorithm were reported. In contrast, neglecting the WB state underestimates preoperative varus deformity and results in a smaller planned opening angle. This leads to potential under correction in MOWHTO, especially in patients with extensive varus deformities or JLCA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Incorporating the WB state in 3D planning modalities has the potential to increase accuracy and lead to a more consistent and reliable planning in MOWHTO. The inclusion of the WB state in automatized surgical planning algorithms has the potential to reduce costs and time in the future.

Influence of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance.

PURPOSE: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is an effective treatment option for realignment of a varus knee. However, a simple supra-tuberositary osteotomy can lead to patella baja and potentially increases the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG). The purpose of this study was to quantify the influence of MOWHTO on TTTG. METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) surface models of five lower extremities with a varus hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and a borderline TTTG (≥ 15 mm), five lower extremities with a varus HKA and a normal TTTG (< 15 mm) and a 3D statistical shape model (SSM) of a neutrally aligned healthy knee were analysed by simulating MOWHTO with a stepwise increment of one degree of valgisation from the preoperative coronal deformity (0°-15°) for each patient, resulting in a total of 165 simulations. Postoperative 3D TTTG and tibial torsion (TT) were measured for each simulation. A mathematical formula was developed to calculate the increase of TTTG after MOWHTO. Mean differences between simulated and calculated TTTG were analysed. RESULTS: Mean preoperative HKA was 6.5 ± 3.0° varus (range 0.8°-11.5°). Mean TTTG increased from 14.2 ± 3.2 mm (range 9.6-19.1) preoperatively to 18.8 ± 3.8 mm (range 14.5-25.0) postoperatively (p = 0.001). TTTG increased approximately linear by + 0.5 ± 0.2° (range 0.3-0.8) per 1° of valgisation with a high positive correlation (0.99, p = 0.001) from 0° to 15°. Mean difference between simulated and calculated TTTG was 0.03 ± 0.02 mm (range 0.01-0.07) per 1° of valgisation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MOWHTO results in an approximately linear increase in TTTG of + 0.5 mm per 1° of valgisation in the range from 0° to 15° and the lateralisation of the tibial tuberosity can be calculated reliably using the described formula. Preoperative analysis of TTTG in patients undergoing MOWHTO may prevent unintentional patellofemoral malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Increased femoral curvature and trochlea flexion in high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees.

PURPOSE: High-grade patellofemoral dysplasia is often associated with concomitant axial and frontal leg malalignment. However, curvature of the femur and sagittal flexion of the trochlea has not yet been studied in patellofemoral dysplastic knees. The aim of the study was to quantify the femoral curvature and sagittal flexion of the trochlea in both high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic and healthy knees. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study matched 19 high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees (Dejour types C and D) with 19 healthy knees according to sex and body mass index. Three-dimensional (3D) femoral curvature and sagittal trochlea flexion were analysed. To analyse femoral curvature, the specific 3D radius of curvature (ROC) was calculated. Trochlear flexion was quantified through the development of the trochlea flexion angle (TFA), which is a novel 3D measurement in relation to the anatomical and mechanical femur axis and is referred to as 3D TFAanatomic and 3D TFAmech. The influence of age, gender, height, weight and frontal and axial alignment on ROC and TFA was analysed in a multiple regression model. RESULTS: Overall ROC was significantly smaller in dysplastic knees, compared with the control group [898.4 ± 210.8 mm (range 452.9-1275.1 mm) vs 1308.4 ± 380.5 mm (range 878.3-2315.8 mm), p < 0.001]. TFA was significantly higher in dysplastic knees, compared with the control group, for 3D TFAmech [13.8 ± 7.2° (range 4.4-33.4°) vs 6.5 ± 2.3° (range 0.8-10.2°), p < 0.001] and 3D TFAanatomic [12.5 ± 7.2° (range 3.1-32.2°) vs 6.4 ± 1.9° (range 2.1-9.1°), p = 0.001]. A smaller ROC was associated with smaller height, female gender and higher femoral ante torsion. An increased TFA was associated with valgus malalignment. CONCLUSION: High-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees demonstrated increased femoral curvature and sagittal flexion of the trochlea, compared with healthy knees. The ROC and newly described TFA allowed the quantification of the sagittal femoral deformity. TFA and ROC should be incorporated in future deformity analysis to investigate their potential as a target for surgical correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Excessive femoral torsion is not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability if TKA is functionally aligned and the patella denervated.

PURPOSE: Recent data suggest that individual morphologic factors should be respected to restore preoperative patellofemoral alignment and thus reduce the likelihood of anterior knee pain. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of excessive femoral torsion (FT) on clinical outcome of TKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA and complete preoperative radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were included. 51 patients showed increased FT of > 20° and were matched for age/sex to 51 controls (FT < 20°). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight matched pairs were compared after a 2 year follow-up clinically (Kujala and patellofemoral score for TKA) and radiographically (FT, frontal leg axis, TT-TG, patellar thickness, patellar tilt, and lateral displacement of patella). Functional alignment of TKA was performed (hybrid-technique). All patellae were denervated but no patella was resurfaced. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between clinical scores two years after surgery between patients with normal and excessive FT (n.s.). Kujala score was 64.3 ± 16.7 versus 64.8 ± 14.4 (n.s.), and patellofemoral score for TKA was 74.3 ± 21 versus 78.5 ± 20.7 (n.s.) for increased FT group and control group, respectively. There was no correlation between preoperative FT and clinical scores. Other radiographic parameters were similar between both groups. No correlations between clinical outcomes and preoperative/postoperative frontal leg axis or total leg axis correction were found (n.s.). CONCLUSION: If the leg axis deformity is corrected to a roughly neutral alignment during cemented TKA, including patellar denervation, then excessive FT was not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, level II.

The relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between anterior pelvic tilt and overall sagittal alignment has been well-described previously. However, the relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment remains unclear. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between pelvic tilt and frontal and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects (60 legs) without prior surgery underwent standing biplanar long leg radiograph. Pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion were measured using SterEOS (EOS Imaging) software. EOS was acquired with the feet directing straight anteriorly, which corresponds to a neutral foot progression angle (FPA). The influence of HKA, femoral antetorsion, tibial torsion and gender on pelvic tilt was analyzed in a univariate correlation and multiple regression model. RESULTS: Sixteen female subjects and 14 male subjects with a mean age of 27.1 years ± 10 (range 20-67) were included. HKA, femoral antetorsion, and tibial torsion correlated with anterior pelvic tilt in univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). Anterior pelvic tilt increased 1.1° (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.5) per 1° of knee valgus (p < 0.001) and 0.5° (95% CI: 0.3 to 0.7) per 1° of external tibial torsion (p < 0.001). Overall, linear regression model fit explained 39% of variance in pelvic tilt by the HKA, femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion (R2 = 0.385; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Valgus alignment and increasing tibial torsion demonstrated a weak correlation with an increase in anterior pelvic tilt in healthy subjects when placing their feet anteriorly. The relationship between frontal, axial leg alignment and pelvic tilt needs to be considered in patients with multiple joint disorders at the hip, knee and spine. Alteration of the frontal, or rotational profile after realignment surgery or by implant positioning might influence the pelvic tilt when the FPA is kept constant.

Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique. METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage. RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion-which is of importance in case of revision surgery-an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm.

Tibial internal rotation in combined anterior cruciate ligament and high-grade anterolateral ligament injury and its influence on ACL length.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury remains challenging but of high importance as the ALL is a contributing stabilizer of tibial internal rotation. The effect of preoperative static tibial internal rotation on ACL -length remains unknown. The aim of the study was analyze the effect of tibial internal rotation on ACL length in single-bundle ACL reconstructions and to quantify tibial internal rotation in combined ACL and ALL injuries. METHODS: The effect of tibial internal rotation on ACL length was computed in a three-dimensional (3D) model of 10 healthy knees with 5° increments of tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30° resulting in 70 simulations. For each step ACL length was measured. ALL injury severity was graded by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist in a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Preoperative tibial internal rotation was measured in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its diagnostic performance was analyzed. RESULTS: ACL length linearly increased 0.7 ± 0.1 mm (2.1 ± 0.5% of initial length) per 5° of tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30° in each patient. Seventeen patients (27.9%) had an intact ALL (grade 0), 10 (16.4%) a grade 1, 21 (34.4%) a grade 2 and 13 (21.3%) a grade 3 injury of the ALL. Patients with a combined ACL and ALL injury grade 3 had a median static tibial internal rotation of 8.8° (interquartile range (IQR): 8.3) compared to 5.6° (IQR: 6.6) in patients with an ALL injury (grade 0-2) (p = 0.03). A cut-off > 13.3° of tibial internal rotation predicted a high-grade ALL injury with a specificity of 92%, a sensitivity of 30%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54-0.85) (p = 0.03) and an accuracy of 79%. CONCLUSION: ACL length linearly increases with tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30°. A combined ACL and high-grade ALL injury was associated with greater preoperative tibial internal rotation. This potentially contributes to unintentional graft laxity in ACL reconstructed patients, in particular with concomitant high-grade ALL tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Registration based assessment of femoral torsion for rotational osteotomies based on the contralateral anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted techniques for surgical treatment of femoral deformities have become increasingly important. In state-of-the-art 3D deformity assessments, the contralateral side is used as template for correction as it commonly represents normal anatomy. Contributing to this, an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is used for registration. However, the anatomical sections of the femur with idiosyncratic features, which allow for a consistent deformity assessment with ICP algorithms being unknown. Furthermore, if there is a side-to-side difference, this is not considered in error quantification. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence and value of the different sections of the femur in 3D assessment of femoral deformities based on the contralateral anatomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 3D triangular surface models were created from CT of 100 paired femurs (50 cadavers) without pathological anatomy. The femurs were divided into sections of eponymous anatomy of a predefined percentage of the whole femoral length. A surface registration algorithm was applied to superimpose the ipsilateral on the contralateral side. We evaluated 3D femoral contralateral registration (FCR) errors, defined as difference in 3D rotation of the respective femoral section before and after registration to the contralateral side. To compare this method, we quantified the landmark-based femoral torsion (LB FT). This was defined as the intra-individual difference in overall femoral torsion using with a landmark-based method. RESULTS: Contralateral rotational deviation ranged from 0° to 9.3° of the assessed femoral sections, depending on the section. Among the sections, the FCR error using the proximal diaphyseal area for registration was larger than any other sectional error. A combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area showed the smallest error. The LB FT error was significantly larger than any sectional error (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that if the contralateral femur is used as reconstruction template, the built-in errors with the registration-based approach are smaller than the intraindividual difference of the femoral torsion between both sides. The errors are depending on the section and their idiosyncratic features used for registration. For rotational osteotomies a combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area sections seems to allow for a reconstruction with a minimal error.

The winking sign is an indicator for increased femorotibial rotation in patients with recurrent patellar instability.

PURPOSE: Rotation of the tibia relative to the femur was recently identified as a contributing risk factor for patellar instability, and correlated with its severity. The hypothesis was that in patellofemoral dysplastic knees, an increase in femorotibial rotation can be reliably detected on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs by an overlap of the lateral femoral condyle over the lateral tibial eminence. METHODS: Sixty patients (77 knees) received low-dose computed tomography (CT) of the lower extremity for assessment of torsional malalignment due to recurrent patellofemoral instability. Three-dimensional (3D) surface models were created to assess femorotibial rotation and its relationship to other morphologic risk factors of patellofemoral instability. On weight-bearing AP knee radiographs, a femoral condyle/lateral tibial eminence superimposition was defined as a positive winking sign. Using digitally reconstructed radiographs of the 3D models, susceptibility of the winking sign to vertical/horizontal AP knee radiograph malrotation was investigated. RESULTS: A positive winking sign was present in 30/77 knees (39.0%) and indicated a 6.3 ± 1.4° increase in femorotibial rotation (p < 0.001). Femoral condyle/tibial eminence superimposition of 1.9 mm detected an increased femorotibial rotation (> 15°) with 43% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.72; p = 0.002). A positive winking sign (with 2 mm overlap) disappeared in case of a 10° horizontally or 15° vertically malrotated radiograph, whereas a 4 mm overlap did not disappear at all, regardless of the quality of the radiograph. In absence of a winking sign, on the other hand, no superimposition resulted within 20° of vertical/horizontal image malrotation. Femorotibial rotation was positively correlated to TT-TG (R2 = 0.40, p = 0.001) and patellar tilt (R2 = 0.30, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The winking sign reliably indicates an increased femorotibial rotation on a weight-bearing AP knee radiograph and could prove useful for day-by-day clinical work. Future research needs to investigate whether femorotibial rotation is not only a prognostic factor but a potential surgical target in patients with patellofemoral disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The effect of native knee rotation on the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove distance in patients with patellar instability: an analysis of MRI and CT measurements.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify the effect of lower limb rotational parameters on the difference in the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove (TTTG) distance when assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with patellar instability. It was hypothesized that an increased native knee rotation angle significantly contributes to an underestimation of TTTG by MRI. METHODS: Forty patients with patellar instability who had undergone standard radiographs, MRI and CT scans were included in this retrospective study. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all imaging for TTTG, femoral and tibial rotation, knee rotation and flexion angle, and trochlear dysplasia. ΔTTTG was defined as the TTTG measured on MRI subtracted from the TTTG measured on CT. Statistical analysis determined the effect of these parameters on the calculated difference between TTTG when measured on CT and MRI. RESULTS: Equal knee flexion in MRI and CT resulted in a ΔTTTG of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm compared to 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in patients with different knee flexion angles in both imaging acquisitions (p = 0.036). The knee rotation angle measured on CT (native knee rotation angle) was negatively correlated with ΔTTTG (r = - 0.365; p = 0.002), while neither tibial nor femoral rotation showed any associations with TTTG (n.s.). Trochlear dysplasia did not show any significant correlation with ΔTTTG, regardless of classification by Dejour or Lippacher (n.s.). Both the native knee rotation angle and the MRI knee flexion angle were independent predictors of ΔTTTG, yet with an opposing effect (knee rotation: 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for ß - 0.468 to - 0.154, p < 0.001; knee flexion 95% CI for ß 0.292 to 0.587, p < 0.001). Patients with a native knee rotation angle > 20° showed a ΔTTTG of - 5.8 ± 4.0 mm (MRI rather overestimates TTTG) compared to 0.9 ± 4.1 mm Δ TTTG (MRI rather underestimates TTTG) in patients with < 20° native knee rotation angle. CONCLUSION: The native knee rotation angle is an independent, inversely correlated predictor of ΔTTTG, thus opposing the effect of knee flexion during MRI acquisition. Consequently, these results suggest that not only knee flexion but also knee rotation should be appreciated when assessing TTTG during patellar instability diagnostic evaluation as it can potentially lead to a false estimation of the TTTG distance on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is the contralateral lesser trochanter a reliable reference for planning of total hip arthroplasty - a 3-dimensional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is mandatory to achieve appropriate offset and leg length equality. However, templating methods using the contralateral hip might be susceptible to errors resulting from side-differences in the femoral morphology. The distance of the lesser trochanter to the femoral head center (LTFHD) is a frequently used reference parameter for preoperative planning and intraoperative validation during THA. However, currently no three-dimensional (3D) analysis of side differences of the LTFHD exists. METHODS: Using Computer tomography (CT)-based surface models from 100 paired femora (50 cadavers), side-to-side asymmetry of the LTFHD, femoral length, femoral head diameter (FHD) and femoral antetorsion were analyzed. Univariate linear regression models were established to evaluate potential associations between sides regarding LTFHD and FHD as well as a correlation of these parameters with each other. RESULTS: Statistically significant side-differences were found for the LTFHD (p = 0.02) and FHD (p = 0.03) with a mean absolute side-difference of 1.6 ± 1.4mm (range 0.1-5.5mm) and 0.4mm ± 0.6mm (range 0-3mm), respectively. The ratio between the LTFHD and FHD was consistent with an average value of 1.16 ± 0.08 and reliable between sides with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.72 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The LTFHD is a reliable reference parameter for preoperative templating and intraoperative validation during THA with a high correlation between sides (r = 0.93, p < 0.01). However, 8 % of the investigated specimens revealed a LTFHD of more than 4mm, which should be anticipated during THA to avoid unsatisfiable results.

A real 3D measurement technique for the tibial slope: differentiation between different articular surfaces and comparison to radiographic slope measurement.

BACKGROUND: The tibial slope plays an important role in knee surgery. However, standard radiographic measurement techniques have a low reproducibility and do not allow differentiation between medial and lateral articular surfaces. Despite availability of three-dimensional imaging, so far, no real 3D measurement technique was introduced and compared to radiographic measurement, which were the purposes of this study. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 54 knees in 51 patients (41 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 46 years (range 22-67 years) were included. A novel 3D measurement technique was applied by two readers to measure the tibial slope of medial and lateral tibial plateau and rim. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the new technique and compare it to a standard radiographic measurement. RESULTS: The mean 3D tibial slope for the medial plateau and rim was 7.4° and 7.6°, for the lateral plateau and rim 7.5° and 8.1°, respectively. The mean radiographic slope was 6.0°. Statistical analysis showed an ICC between both readers of 0.909, 0.987, 0.918, 0.893, for the 3D measurement of medial plateau, medial rim, lateral plateau and lateral rim, respectively, whereas the radiographic technique showed an ICC of 0.733. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed novel measurement technique shows a high intraclass agreement and offers an applicable opportunity to assess the tibial slope three-dimensionally. Furthermore, the medial and lateral articular surfaces can be measured separately and one can differentiate the slope from the plateau and from the rim. As three-dimensional planning becomes successively more important, our measurement technique might deliver a useful supplement to the standard radiographic assessment in slope related knee surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

The impact of mal-angulated femoral rotational osteotomies on mechanical leg axis: a computer simulation model.

BACKGROUND: Subtrochanteric or supracondylar femoral rotational osteotomies are established surgical treatments for femoral rotational deformities. Unintended change of the mechanical leg axis is an identified problem. Different attempts exist to plan a correct osteotomy plane, but implementation of the preoperative planning into the surgical situation can be challenging. Goal of this study was to identify the critical threshold of mal-angulation of the osteotomy plane and of femoral rotation that leads to a relevant deviation of the postoperative mechanical leg axis using a computer simulation approach. METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) surface models of the lower extremity of two patients (Model 1: 42° femoral antetorsion; Model 2: 6° femoral retrotorsion) were generated from computed tomography data. First, baseline subtrochanteric and supracondylar rotational osteotomies, perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis were simulated. Afterwards, mal-angulated osteotomies in sagittal and frontal plane followed by different degrees of rotation were simulated and frontal mechanical axis was analyzed. RESULTS: 400 mal-angulated osteotomies have been simulated. Mal-angulation of ±30° with 30° rotation showed maximum deviation from preoperative mechanical axis in subtrochanteric osteotomies (4.0° ± 0.4°) and in supracondylar osteotomies (12.4° ± 0.8°). Minimal mal-angulation of 15° in sagittal plane in subtrochanteric osteotomies and mal-angulation of 10° in sagittal plane in supracondylar osteotomies altered the mechanical axis by > 2°. Mal-angulation in sagittal plane showed higher deviations of the mechanical axis (up to 12.4° ± 0.8°), than in frontal plane mal-angulation (up to 4.0° ± 1.9°). CONCLUSION: A femoral rotational osteotomy, perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis, has no considerable influence on the mechanical leg axis. However, mal-angulation of femoral rotational osteotomies showed relevant changes of the mechanical leg axis. In supracondylar respectively subtrochanteric procedures, mal-angulation of only 10° in combination with already 15° of femoral rotation respectively mal-angulation of 15° in combination with 30° of femoral rotation, can lead to a relevant postoperative mechanical leg axis deviation of more than 2°, wherefore these patients probably would benefit from the use of navigation aids.

The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

BACKGROUND: Deformity assessment and preoperative planning of realignment surgery are conventionally based on weight-bearing (WB) radiographs. However, newer technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and surgical navigation with patient-specific instruments (PSI) rely on non-weight bearing (NWB) computed tomography (CT) data. Additionally, differences between conventional two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements are known. The goal of the present study was to systematically analyse the influence of WB and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on common WB-dependent measurements used for deformity assessment. METHODS: 85 lower limbs could be included. Two readers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in 2D WB and 2D NWB radiographs, as well as in CT-reconstructed 3D models using an already established 3D measurement method for HKA, and a newly developed 3D measurement method for JLCA, respectively. Interrater and intermodality reliability was assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences between WB and NWB measurements were found for HKA (p < 0.001) and JLCA (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA (p = 0.09). The difference between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA was significant (p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the interrater agreement was almost perfect for all HKA and 3D JLCA measurements and substantial for 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB. ICC for the intermodality agreement was almost perfect between 2D HKA WB and 2D HKA NWB as well as between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA, whereas it was moderate between 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB and between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA. CONCLUSION: Limb loading results in significant differences for both HKA and JLCA measurements. Furthermore, 2D projections were found to be insufficient to represent 3D joint anatomy in complex cases. With an increasing number of surgical approaches based on NWB CT-reconstructed models, research should focus on the development of 3D planning methods that consider the effects of WB on leg alignment.

Malpositioning of patient-specific instruments within the possible degrees of freedom in high-tibial osteotomy has no considerable influence on mechanical leg axis correction.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are helpful tools in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with symptomatic varus malalignment of the mechanical leg axis. However, the precision of HTO can decrease with malpositioned PSI. This study investigates the influence of malpositioned PSI on axis correction, osteotomy, and implant placement. METHODS: With a mean three-dimensional (3D) model (0.8° varus), PSI-navigated HTOs were computer simulated. Two different guide designs, one with stabilising hooks and one without, were used. By adding rotational and translational offsets of different degrees, wrong placements of PSI were simulated. After 5° valgisation of the postoperative mechanical axis, the distance between joint-plane and osteotomy screws, respectively, were measured. The same simulations were performed in a patient with varus deformity (7.4° varus). RESULTS: In the mean 3D model, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.9°-4.5° valgus with mean value of 4.1° ± 0.1° (correct axis 4.2° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 17 of 76 HTOs. Significantly safer screw placement was observed using PSI with stabilising hooks (p = 0.012). In the case of the 3D model with 7.4° varus deformity, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.2°-3.9° valgus with mean value of 3.8° ± 0.2° (correct axis 3.9° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 3 of 38 HTOs. Screws were always within the safety distance. CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of the presented study is that malpositioning of a PSI within the possible degrees of freedom does not have a relevant influence on the axis correction. The most vulnerable plane for surgical failure is the sagittal plane, wherefore the treating surgeon should verify correct guide placement to prevent surgical failure, particularly in this plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Rotation or flexion alters mechanical leg axis measurements comparably in patients with different coronal alignment.

PURPOSE: Flexion and rotation of the knee joint are supposed to alter the measurement of the mechanical leg axis on long leg radiographs. However, in patients with varus or valgus alignment it has not been systematically analyzed so far. The hypothesis is that measurement of the mechanical leg axis is more influenced by flexion and rotation in presence of varus or valgus alignment compared to patients with a straight coronal alignment. METHODS: 3D surface models of the lower extremities of seven individuals with varying degrees of coronal alignment were created based on CT data. The coronal alignment of the seven individuals captured the range between 9° varus and 9° valgus with equal steps of 3°. Combinations of internal and external rotations of 10°, 20°, and 30° with flexion of 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 30° were simulated. The mechanical leg axis was measured for each combination as the antero-posterior (ap)-projected hip-knee-ankle (HKA-) angle. RESULTS: 294 simulations with all combinations of rotation and flexion were performed. Ranges of deviation of HKA never showed a critical deviation of more than 3° from median values. Deviations from baseline appeared normally distributed for all flexion and rotation combinations (p < 0.05) and the probability for a deviation from the mean mechanical leg axis of more than 3° was less than 0.03 for all combinations. Comparability of the models, therefore, could be assumed. CONCLUSION: Deviations in HKA-angle measurements, caused by rotation or flexion, does not vary relevantly through the range of coronal alignment of 9° varus to 9° valgus. As a clinical relevance, deviations in HKA-angle measurements can be considered as comparable in patients with different coronal alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Accuracy of three dimensional-planned patient-specific instrumentation in femoral and tibial rotational osteotomy for patellofemoral instability.

PURPOSE: Patellofemoral instability can be caused by tibial or femoral torsional deformity. Established surgical treatment options are rotational osteotomies, but the transfer from pre-operative planning to surgical execution can be challenging. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) are proofed to be helpful tools in realignment surgery. However, accuracy of PSI in femoral and tibial rotational osteotomies remains still unknown. Goal of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of PSI in femoral and tibial rotational osteotomies in a patient population suffering from patellofemoral instability. METHODS: All patients that underwent femoral or tibial rotational osteotomy using PSI in case of patellofemoral instability from October 2015 until April 2019 in our clinic were included. Twelve knees with twelve supracondylar femoral and seven supratuberositary tibial rotational osteotomies could be included. Accuracy of the correction was assessed using pre- and post-operative CT scans based on conventional measurements and, in 3D, based on 3D bone models of the respective patients. RESULTS: CT measurements revealed an absolute difference between planned and achieved rotation of 4.8° ± 3.1° for femoral and 7.9° ± 3.7° for tibial rotational osteotomies without significant difference (p = 0.069). Regarding 3D assessment, a significant difference could be observed for the residual error between femoral and tibial rotational osteotomies in the 3D angle (p = 0.014) with a higher accuracy for the femoral side. CONCLUSION: The application of PSI for femoral and tibial rotational osteotomy is a safe surgical treatment option. Accuracy for femoral rotational osteotomies is higher compared with tibial rotational osteotomies using PSI.