Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Patients with Pneumonia, Bloodstream Infection/Sepsis, or Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. The standard dosing regimen of cefiderocol is 2 g administered every 8 hours over 3 hours infusion in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL) of 60 to 119 ml/min, and it is adjusted for patients with <60 ml/min or ≥120 ml/min CrCL. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was constructed using 3,427 plasma concentrations from 91 uninfected subjects and 425 infected patients with pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis (BSI/sepsis), and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Plasma cefiderocol concentrations were adequately described by the population PK model, and CrCL was the most significant covariate. No other factors, including infection sites and mechanical ventilation, were clinically relevant, although the effect of infection sites was identified as a statistically significant covariate in the population PK analysis. No clear pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship was found for any of the microbiological outcome, clinical outcome, or vital status. This is because the estimated percentage of time for which free plasma concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) over dosing interval (%fT>MIC) was 100% in most of the enrolled patients. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for 100% fT>MIC was >90% against MICs of ≤4 µg/ml for all infection sites and renal function groups except for BSI/sepsis patients with normal renal function (85%). These study results support adequate plasma exposure can be achieved at the cefiderocol recommended dosing regimen for the infected patients, including the patients with augmented renal function, ventilation, and/or severe illness.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Lung penetration of cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, has previously been evaluated in healthy subjects. This study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of cefiderocol at steady state in hospitalized, mechanically ventilated pneumonia patients. METHODS: Patients received cefiderocol 2 g (or ≤1.5 g if renally impaired), administered IV q8h as a 3 h infusion, or 2 g q6h if patients had augmented renal function (estimated CLCR > 120 mL/min). After multiple doses, each patient underwent a single bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedure either at the end of the infusion or at 2 h after the end of infusion. Plasma samples were collected at 1, 3, 5 and 7 h after the start of infusion. After correcting for BAL dilution, cefiderocol concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for each patient and the ELF/unbound plasma concentration ratio (RC, E/P) were calculated. Safety was assessed up to 7 days after the last cefiderocol dose. RESULTS: Seven patients received cefiderocol. Geometric mean ELF concentration of cefiderocol was 7.63 mg/L at the end of infusion and 10.40 mg/L at 2 h after the end of infusion. RC, E/P was 0.212 at the end of infusion and 0.547 at 2 h after the end of infusion, suggesting delayed lung distribution. There were no adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cefiderocol penetrates the ELF in critically ill pneumonia patients with concentrations that are sufficient to treat Gram-negative bacteria with an MIC of ≤4 mg/L.

Human mass balance, metabolism, and cytochrome P450 phenotyping of lusutrombopag.

The human mass balance of lusutrombopag, an orally bioavailable thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, was characterised in seven healthy male subjects after a single oral dose of [14C]-lusutrombopag (2 mg, 100 µCi) in solution. Lusutrombopag was the main component in plasma, accounting for 56% of plasma radioactivity AUC0-∞. In plasma, the half-life of radioactivity (70.7 h) was longer than that of lusutrombopag (25.7 h), suggesting the presence of long circulating metabolites. The main excretion pathway of lusutorombopag was feces, with a radioactivity recovery of approximately 83% within 336 h post-dose. M6 (lusutrombopag-O-propanol or lusutrombopag-O-acetic acid) and M7 (lusutrombopag-O-ethane-1,2-diol) were also identified as main components in feces, accounting for at most 17.9%, and 16.9% of the dose, respectively, and were ß-oxidation related metabolites. Our in vitro metabolism study of lusutrombopag indicated that ß-oxidation was a subsequent metabolism of ω-oxidation and CYP4 enzymes, including CYP4A11, were the major isozymes contributing to ω-oxidation. In conclusion, lusutrombopag is primarily eliminated via ω-oxidation and excreted in the feces, where CYP4 enzymes play an important role.

Evaluation of covariate effects using variance-based global sensitivity analysis in pharmacometrics.

In pharmacometrics, understanding a covariate effect on an interested outcome is essential for assessing the importance of the covariate. Variance-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA) can simultaneously quantify contribution of each covariate effect to the variability for the interested outcome considering with random effects. The aim of this study was to apply GSA to pharmacometric models to assess covariate effects. Simulations were conducted with pharmacokinetic models to characterize the GSA for assessment of covariate effects and with an example of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models to apply the GSA to a complex model. In the simulations, covariate and random variables were generated to simulate the outcomes using the models. Ratios of variance explained by each factor (each covariate and random effect) over the overall variance of the outcome were used as sensitivity indices. The sensitivity indices were consistent with the effect size of covariate. The sensitivity indices identified the importance of creatinine clearance on the pharmacokinetic exposure for a renally-excreted drug. These sensitivity indices could be applied to plasma concentrations over time (repeated measurable outcomes over time) as interested outcomes. Using the GSA, each contribution of all of the covariate effects could be efficiently identified even in the complex QSP model. Variance-based GSA can provide insight when considering the importance of covariate effects by simultaneously and quantitatively assessing all covariate and random effects on interested outcomes in pharmacometrics.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships of Baloxavir Marboxil in Influenza Patients at High Risk of Complications.

Baloxavir marboxil, a prodrug of cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir acid, reduces the time to improvement of influenza symptoms in patients infected with type A or B influenza virus. To characterize its pharmacokinetics, a population pharmacokinetic model for baloxavir acid was developed using 11,846 plasma concentration data items from 1,827 subjects, including 2,341 plasma concentration data items from 664 patients at high risk of influenza complications. A three-compartment model with first-order elimination and first-order absorption with lag time well described the plasma concentration data. Body weight and race were found to be the most important factors influencing clearance and volume of distribution. The exposures in high-risk patients were similar to those in otherwise healthy patients, and no pharmacokinetic difference was identified regarding any risk factors for influenza complications. Exposure-response analyses were performed regarding the time to improvement of symptoms and the reduction in the influenza virus titer in high-risk patients. The analyses suggested that body weight-based dosage, 40 mg for patients weighing <80 kg and 80 mg for patients weighing ≥80 kg, can shorten the time to improvement of influenza symptoms and reduce virus titer for both type A and B influenza virus regardless of the exposure levels of the high-risk patients as well as for the otherwise healthy influenza patients. The results of our population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses in patients with risk factors of influenza complications should provide useful information on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of baloxavir marboxil and also for the optimization of dose regimens.

Evaluation of drug-drug interaction of lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, via metabolic enzymes and transporters.

PURPOSE: Drug-drug interaction (DDI) potentials of lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and of cyclosporine, which inhibits P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, on lusutrombopag pharmacokinetics were assessed via clinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. METHODS: The effect of lusutrombopag on midazolam (a CYP3A probe substrate) pharmacokinetics was assessed in 15 healthy subjects receiving a single midazolam 5-mg dose with or without coadministration of lusutrombopag 0.75 mg for 6 days (first dose: 1.5-mg dose). The effect of cyclosporine on lusutrombopag pharmacokinetics was assessed in 16 healthy subjects receiving a single lusutrombopag 3-mg dose with or without a single cyclosporine 400- to 600-mg dose. PBPK modeling was employed to extrapolate the effect of lusutrombopag at the clinical dose (3 mg once daily) on midazolam pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: In the clinical study, mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of with/without lusutrombopag for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of midazolam were 1.01 (0.908-1.13) and 1.04 (0.967-1.11), respectively, indicating no effect of lusutrombopag on midazolam pharmacokinetics. PBPK modeling suggested no effect of lusutrombopag at the clinical dose on midazolam pharmacokinetics. Mean ratios (90% CIs) of with/without cyclosporine for lusutrombopag Cmax and AUC were 1.18 (1.11-1.24) and 1.19 (1.13-1.25), respectively, indicating a slight increase in lusutrombopag exposure. CONCLUSIONS: In consideration with in vitro data, the in vivo and in silico results suggested no clinically significant DDI potential of lusutrombopag with other medical products via metabolic enzymes and transporters.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin.

Cefiderocol, a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, exhibits potent in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy against most gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. In phase 1 studies, cefiderocol demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics, primarily urinary excretion, an elimination half-life of 2-3 hours, and a protein binding of 58% in human plasma. Cefiderocol is a time-dependent cephalosporin; the probability of a target attainment at ≥75% of the dosing interval during which the free drug concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (ƒT/MIC) for bacterial strains with an MIC of ≤4 µg/mL is likely to be achieved at the therapeutic dose of 2 g over 3-hour infusion every 8 hours in most patients. As expected, renal function markers were the most influential covariates for the pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol for patients with renal impairment or augmented renal clearance (ARC). Dose adjustment is recommended for patients with impaired renal function, and additionally, in ARC patients with creatinine clearance >120 mL/minute, a more frequent dosing regimen (ie, 2 g every 6 hours) was predicted to achieve the target fT > MIC. The single and multiple doses of cefiderocol tested were well tolerated in both healthy subjects and those with renal impairment. Furthermore, neither QT interval prolongation nor drug-drug interaction via organic anion transporters was demonstrated in healthy subjects. Cefiderocol is being investigated in phase 3 clinical studies for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of radiolabeled naldemedine in healthy subjects.

1. Naldemedine is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. 2. This phase 1 study investigated the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of naldemedine, following a single oral 2-mg dose of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine or [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine to 12 healthy adult male subjects. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed on blood, urine and fecal samples collected at defined intervals. 3. Naldemedine was the major circulating component in plasma with a median Tmax of approximately 0.8-0.9 h and a geometric mean t1/2,z of approximately 11 h. Total systemic exposures, AUC, of metabolites nor-naldemedine were less abundant than those of naldemedine (9% or 13% of AUC of naldemedine) and 16.2% or 18.1% of naldemedine was excreted as unchanged in urine after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine or [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine, respectively, and benzamidine was the major radioactive component after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine (32.5% of administered dose). Overall, the recovery of total radioactivity was 92% (57.3% in urine; 34.8% in feces) after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine and 85% (20.4% in urine; 64.3% in feces) after administration of [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine. 4. Our findings suggest that naldemedine is mainly metabolized to nor-naldemedine. Naldemedine was rapidly absorbed and well tolerated, with no major safety signals observed.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Healthy Subjects, Subjects with Various Degrees of Renal Function, and Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis.

Cefiderocol, a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, exhibits potent efficacy against most Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to perform a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis based on plasma cefiderocol concentrations in healthy subjects, subjects with various degrees of renal function, and patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AUP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens and to calculate the fraction of the time during the dosing interval where the free drug concentration in plasma exceeds the MIC (fTMIC). Population PK models were developed with three renal function markers, body surface area-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), absolute eGFR, and creatinine clearance, on the basis of 2,571 plasma concentrations from 91 subjects without infection and 238 patients with infection. The population PK models with each renal function marker adequately described the plasma cefiderocol concentrations. Clear relationships of total clearance (CL) to all renal function markers were observed. Body weight and disease status (with or without infection) were also significant covariates. The CL in patients with infection was 26% higher than that in subjects without infection. The fTMIC values were more than 75% in all patients (and were 100% in most patients), suggesting that a sufficient exposure to cefiderocol was provided by the tested dose regimens (2 g every 8 h as the standard dose regimen) for the treatment of cUTI or AUP caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships of Naldemedine.

PURPOSE: To characterize population pharmacokinetic (PK) of naldemedine, to identify factors which influence naldemedine PK, and to evaluate their clinical relevancy based on exposure-response relationships. METHODS: A population PK model was developed with pooled naldemedine concentrations from healthy subjects, patients with chronic non-cancer pain and opioid-induced constipation (OIC), and cancer patients with OIC. Exposure-response analyses were performed with efficacy (responder or non-responder) and safety (occurrence of gastrointestinal disorders or not) data in phase 2b and phase 3 studies. RESULTS: Naldemedine plasma concentrations were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and absorption lag time. The final model included the effects of age, creatinine clearance, race, and gender on apparent total clearance; the effects of body weight, health status, and food condition on apparent volume of central compartment; and the effect of age on first-order rate of absorption. When subjects took 0.2 mg of naldemedine once daily, the probability of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders was predicted to be approximately 50%, while that of severe gastrointestinal disorders was predicted to be less than 3%. The influence of the covariates on PK was not considered clinically significant because similar efficacy and safety were expected based on the exposure-response analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The covariates are identified in the population PK analysis; however, no dose-adjustment is required for them based on the exposure-response analysis.

Drug-drug interaction of cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, via human drug transporters.

PURPOSE: Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, will be used concomitantly with other medications for treatment of bacterial infections. In vitro studies demonstrated inhibition potential of cefiderocol on organic anion transporter (OAT) 1, OAT3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 2-K, and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3. The aim of this study was to assess in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of cefiderocol using probe substrates for these transporters. METHODS: DDI potentials of cefiderocol as inhibitors were assessed in a clinical study consisting of 3 cohorts. Twelve or 13 healthy adult subjects per cohort orally received a single dose of furosemide 20 mg (for OAT1/3), metformin 1000 mg (for OCT1/2 and MATE2-K), or rosuvastatin 10 mg (for OATP1B3) with or without co-administration with cefiderocol 2 g every 8 h with 3-h infusion (a total of 3, 6, and 9 doses of cefiderocol with furosemide, metformin, and rosuvastatin, respectively). DDI potentials were assessed based on the pharmacokinetics of the substrates. RESULTS: Ratios (90% confidence intervals) of maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 1.00 (0.71-1.42) and 0.92 (0.73-1.16) for furosemide, 1.09 (0.92-1.28) and 1.03 (0.93-1.15) for metformin, and 1.28 (1.12-1.46) and 1.21 (1.08-1.35) for rosuvastatin, respectively. Exposures to furosemide or metformin did not change when co-administered with cefiderocol. Slight increase in rosuvastatin exposure was observed with co-administered with cefiderocol, which was not considered to be clinically significant. Each treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol has no clinically significant DDI potential via drug transporters.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, for Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function.

Cefiderocol, a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, exhibits potent efficacy against most Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. Since cefiderocol is excreted primarily via the kidneys, this study was conducted to develop a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model to determine dose adjustment based on renal function. Population PK models were developed based on data for cefiderocol concentrations in plasma, urine, and dialysate with a nonlinear mixed-effects model approach. Monte-Carlo simulations were conducted to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of fraction of time during the dosing interval where the free drug concentration in plasma exceeds the MIC (Tf>MIC) for an MIC range of 0.25 to 16 µg/ml. For the simulations, dose regimens were selected to compare cefiderocol exposure among groups with different levels of renal function. The developed models well described the PK of cefiderocol for each renal function group. A dose of 2 g every 8 h with 3-h infusions provided >90% PTA for 75% Tf>MIC for an MIC of ≤4 µg/ml for patients with normal renal function, while a more frequent dose (every 6 h) could be used for patients with augmented renal function. A reduced dose and/or extended dosing interval was selected for patients with impaired renal function. A supplemental dose immediately after intermittent hemodialysis was proposed for patients requiring intermittent hemodialysis. The PK of cefiderocol could be adequately modeled, and the modeling-and-simulation approach suggested dose regimens based on renal function, ensuring drug exposure with adequate bactericidal effect.

Population pharmacokinetics of ospemifene and safety evaluation of pharmacokinetic alterations caused by intrinsic and extrinsic factors
.

PURPOSE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to assess factors influencing ospemifene pharmacokinetics and to assess safety for pharmacokinetic alteration observed in drug development. METHOD: A PPK model was constructed using pooled ospemifene concentrations. Covariates considered before start of the analysis were: age, race, body weight, BMI, albumin, alanine amino-transferase, bilirubin, and creatinine clearance. The expected distribution of ospemifene concentration was derived for the 4 cases in phase-1 studies that increased ospemifene exposure: administration to severe renal impairment subjects (case 1), administration to moderate hepatic impairment subjects (case 2), coadministration with ketoconazole (case 3), or coadministration with fluconazole (case 4). Safety information in a long-term safety trial was used to assess the potential changes in risk of adverse events with ospemifene-exposure increase. RESULTS: The PPK parameter estimates were 9.16 L/h for CL/F, 34.3 L for V2/F, 16.4 L/h for Q/F, 250 L for V3/F, and 0.522 h-1 for ka, based on the final model. Distributions of estimated AUC in a phase-3 study largely covered the expected distribution for case 1, case 2, or case 3, but did not overlap the expected distribution for case 4. The incidences of adverse events were not associated with ospemifene exposure in the long-term safety study. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an ospemifene PPK model and identified no relevant covariate in the PPK analysis. The drug appears safe to use in renal impairment, moderate hepatic impairment, and when coadministered with ketoconazole. Ospemifene should not be administered with fluconazole.
.

Population pharmacokinetics of peramivir in healthy volunteers and influenza patients.

UNLABELLED: Peramivir is an intravenous anti-influenza agent that inhibits viral growth by selectively inhibiting neuraminidase in human influenza A and B viruses. To characterize its pharmacokinetics, a population pharmacokinetic analysis of peramivir was performed using 3,199 plasma concentration data samples from 332 subjects in six clinical studies in Japan and the United States, including studies with renal impairment subjects, elderly subjects, and influenza patients. A three-compartment model well described the plasma concentration data for peramivir, and creatinine clearance was found to be the most important factor influencing clearance. Age and body weight were also found to be covariates for clearance and the volume of distribution, respectively. No difference in pharmacokinetics was found between genders or between Japanese and U.S. SUBJECTS: Small differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between uninfected subjects and influenza patients (clearance was 18% higher and the volume of distribution was 6% lower in influenza patients). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that single adjusted doses of 1/3- and 1/6-fold for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively, would give areas under the curve comparable to those for patients with normal renal function. The population pharmacokinetic model developed for peramivir should be useful for understanding its pharmacokinetic characteristics and for dose adjustment on the basis of renal function.

The effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of ospemifene, a tissue-selective estrogen agonist/antagonist.

Ospemifene is a nonestrogen tissue-selective estrogen agonist/antagonist approved to treat moderate to severe dyspareunia due to vulvar and vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Three single-dose, open-label, parallel-group pharmacokinetic studies examined the pharmacokinetics of ospemifene in postmenopausal women with (1) mild hepatic impairment (n = 7), (2) moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), and (3) severe renal impairment (n = 8) compared with a similar number of matched healthy controls. The study durations ranged from 8 to 12 days. Study participants received a single oral dose of ospemifene 60 mg on day 1 and blood samples were collected serially. The geometric mean ratios (hepatic or renal impairment/healthy) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax), respectively, of ospemifene were 90.86% (90% CI, 65.95%-125.19%) and 79.48% (90% CI, 65.95%-95.79%) in the mild hepatic impairment study; 128.62% (90% CI, 87.13%-189.88%) and 101.12% (90% CI, 66.17%-154.52%) in the moderate hepatic impairment study, and 119.63% (90% CI, 81.37%-175.88%) and 79.30% (90% CI, 52.85%-118.99%) in the severe renal impairment study. Overall, there was no clinically important effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of ospemifene, indicating that dosing does not need to be adjusted in postmenopausal women with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or in subjects with severe renal impairment.

Dolutegravir Has No Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptives With Norgestimate and Ethinyl Estradiol.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG; Tivicay; ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC) is an HIV-1-unboosted integrase inhibitor with no cytochrome P450 or uridine 5'diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase inhibition or induction. As DTG is administered to HIV-1-infected women receiving oral contraceptives, assessing the potential for drug interactions was warranted. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of DTG on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a common oral contraceptive, norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol (NGM/EE; Ortho-Cyclen; Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Raritan, NJ). METHODS: This randomized, 2-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted within 1 menstrual cycle at 1 clinical center in the United States; 16 women were enrolled. Participants received NGM 0.25 mg/EE 0.035 mg throughout the study. During days 1 to 10, they were randomized to receive twice-daily DTG 50 mg or matching placebo with food and switched to the other treatment during days 12 to 21. RESULTS: Ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 until end of the dosage interval (AUC0-τ), maximum plasma concentration, and concentration at the end of the dosage interval of norelgestromin with DTG treatment to the same PK parameters with placebo treatment were 0.975, 0.890, and 0.932, respectively; for EE, ratios were 1.03, 0.99, and 1.02, respectively. No significant differences in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone were detected on days 1, 10, 11, 21, and 22. DTG steady-state AUC0-τ was similar to historical data. No severe or grade 3/4 adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: DTG had no effect on NGM/EE PK or PD. NGM/EE can be administered with DTG without dose adjustment.

Population pharmacokinetics of doripenem in Japanese subjects and Monte-Carlo simulation for patients with renal impairment.

Integrated analysis of all plasma concentration data obtained from phase 1 studies in Japanese subjects, including a high dose study and special population studies, was conducted to thoroughly re-investigate the pharmacokinetics of doripenem by means of a population approach. Dose adjustments for patients with renal impairment were assessed by Monte-Carlo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics simulation. The population pharmacokinetics of doripenem was evaluated using 921 plasma concentration data from 92 subjects from eight phase 1 studies in Japan. The two-compartment model could well describe the plasma concentration profile of doripenem after intravenous infusion. Creatinine clearance and age were found to be covariates of doripenem clearance, and creatinine clearance was the most important factor influencing the pharmacokinetics of doripenem, which is consistent with the fact that doripenem is mainly excreted via the urine. Simulations suggest that exposures (AUC) to 1 g every 8 h for patients with normal renal function would be similar to those expected at 1 g every 12 h, 0.5 g every 8 h and 0.25 g every 8 h for patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. These dosing regimens also provide sufficient exposure to doripenem from the viewpoint of the percentage of time above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

Effect of fosamprenavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in healthy subjects.

Dolutegravir (DTG) is an HIV integrase inhibitor (INI) with demonstrated activity in INI-naive and INI-resistant patients. The objective of this open-label, 2-period, single-sequence study was to evaluate the effect of fosamprenavir-ritonavir (FPV-RTV) on the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of DTG. Twelve healthy subjects received 50 mg DTG once daily for 5 days (period 1), followed by 10 days of 50 mg DTG once daily in combination with 700/100 mg FPV-RTV every 12 h (period 2). All doses were administered in the fasting state. Serial pharmacokinetic samples for DTG and amprenavir and safety assessments were obtained throughout the study. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, and geometric least-squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals were generated for within-subject treatment comparison. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir decreased the DTG area under the concentration-time curve, maximum concentration in plasma, and concentration in plasma at the end of the dosing interval by 35%, 24%, and 49%, respectively. Both DTG and DTG with FPV-RTV were well tolerated; no subject withdrew because of adverse events. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were rash, abnormal dreams, and nasopharyngitis. The modest decrease in DTG exposure when it was coadministered with FPV-RTV is not considered clinically significant, and DTG dose adjustment is not required with coadministration of FPV-RTV in INI-naive patient populations on the basis of established "no-effect" boundaries of DTG. In the INI-resistant population, as a cautionary measure, alternative combinations that do not include FPV-RTV should be considered. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01209065.).

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in HIV-seronegative subjects with severe renal impairment.

PURPOSE: Dolutegravir (DTG), an unboosted HIV integrase inhibitor (INI), is metabolized by UGT1A1 and to a minor extent by CYP3A. Renal elimination of unchanged DTG is very low (< 1 %). As renal impairment may affect pharmacokinetics (PK), even for drugs primarily metabolized or secreted in bile, this study investigated the effect of renal impairment on the PK of DTG. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-dose study of oral DTG 50 mg administered to subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CLcr] <30 mL/min; not on dialysis) and to healthy controls (CLcr >90 mL/min) matched for gender, age and body mass index (8 subjects per group). Serial PK samples were collected up to 72 h post-dose for determination of DTG and DTG-glucuronide (DTG-Gluc) concentrations in plasma. DTG unbound fraction in plasma was determined at 3 and 24 h. PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods and compared between groups by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: DTG was well tolerated with a low incidence of Grade 1 adverse events. DTG PK parameters showed significant overlap between groups. DTG mean exposure was lower in subjects with severe renal impairment compared to healthy, matched subjects: AUC(0-∞) and Cmax were 40 % and 23 % lower, while mean DTG-Gluc was increased. Renal impairment did not affect DTG fraction unbound in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The modest reductions in mean PK exposures for DTG and increases for DTG-Gluc in the severe renal impairment group are not considered clinically significant. DTG does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment.