Cognitive Functioning in Survivors of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With a Matched General Population Sample-The Maastricht Observational Study of Late Effects After Stem Cell trAnsplantation Study.

Although cognitive problems can recover over time, a subgroup of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) survivors experience persistent cognitive problems in the long term. Despite these implications, studies assessing cognitive functioning in HCT survivors are limited. The aim of the present study was (1) to quantify the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients treated with HCT who survived at least 2 years and to compare these with a matched reference group representing the general population; (2) to identify potential determinants of cognitive functioning within the HCT survivor group. Within the single-center Maastricht Observational study of late effects after Stem cell trAnsplantation, cognitive performance was assessed by a neuropsychological test battery divided into 3 cognitive domains: memory, information processing speed, and executive function and attention. An overall cognition score was calculated as the average of the domain scores. A total of 115 HCT survivors were group-matched on a 1:4 ratio to the reference group by age, sex, and level of education. Regression analyses adjusted for different sets of covariates including demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors were used to test for differences in cognition between HCT survivors and the reference group resembling the general population. A limited set of clinical characteristics (diagnosis, type of transplant, time since treatment, conditioning regimen with total body irradiation and age at time of transplantation) were assessed as potential determinants of neurocognitive dysfunction among HCT survivors. Cognitive impairment was defined as scores in the cognitive domains < -1.5 standard deviation (SD) from what can be expected based on someone's age, sex, and education. The mean age at time of transplantation was 50.2 (SD ± 11.2) years, and the mean number of years after transplant was 8.7 (SD ± 5.7) years. The majority of HCT survivors were treated with autologous HCT (n = 73 [64%]). The prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 34.8% in HCT survivors and 21.3% in the reference group (p = .002.) When adjusted for age, sex, and level of education, HCT survivors had a worse overall cognition score (b = -0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to -0.16; p < .001), translating into 9.0 years of higher cognitive age. Analyses of specific cognitive domain scores showed that HCT survivors scored worse on memory (b = -0.43; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.13; p = .005), information processing speed (b = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.55 to -0.11; p = .003), and executive function and attention (b = -0.29; 95% CI, -.55 to -.03; p = .031) than the reference group. The odds of cognitive impairment were on average 2.4 times higher among HCT survivors than the reference group (odd ratio = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.47-4.07; p = .001). Within the HCT survivor group none of the tested clinical determinants of cognitive impairment were significantly associated with cognition. This cohort study showed evidence for worse cognitive functioning in HCT survivors encompassing all three cognitive domains, respectively memory, information processing speed, and executive and attention compared to a reference group that represents the general population translating into nine years of faster cognitive ageing in HCT survivors than can be expected based on their chronological age. It is important to increase awareness for signs of neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT in clinicians and HCT survivors.

Having a Pap smear, quality of life before and after cervical screening: a questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of cervical cancer screening in women with normal test results. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. SETTING: Maastricht, the Netherlands. POPULATION: A cohort of 789 women were followed from screening invitation until after the receipt of screening results. A female age-matched reference group (n=567) was included. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to the home address of the women before screening, after screening, and again with the screening results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Generic HRQoL (SF-12, EQ-5D), generic anxiety (STAI-6), screen-specific anxiety (PCQ), and potential symptoms and feelings related to the smear-taking procedure. RESULTS: A total of 60% of screening participants completed questionnaire 1(n=924): 803 of these women granted permission to access their files; 789 of these 803 women had normal test results (Pap 1), and were included in the analyses. Generic HRQoL (SF-12, EQ-5D) and anxiety (STAI-6) scores were similar in the study and reference groups. Before screening, after screening, and also after the receipt of test results, screening participants reported less screen-specific anxiety (PCQ, P<0.001) than the reference group (n=567), with differences indicating clinical relevance. 19% of screening participants were bothered by feelings of shame, pain, inconvenience, or nervousness during smear taking, and 8 and 5% of women experienced lower abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, discharge, or urinary problems for 2-3 and 4-7 days, respectively, following the Pap smear. CONCLUSION: The reduced levels of screen-specific anxiety in screening participants, possibly indicating reassurance, are worthwhile addressing in more depth. We conclude that although considerable numbers of women reported unpleasant effects, there were no adverse HRQoL consequences of cervical screening in women with normal test results.