Effects of essential oils on economically important characteristics of ruminant species: A comprehensive review.

Essential oils derived from plants can provide biological impacts to livestock species. Scientific studies researching essential oils in livestock have investigated various essential oils for prevention and treatment of microbial infection and parasites as well as to enhance milk production, animal performance and rumen function. Despite the availability of several commercial products containing essential oils to promote animal health and production, the vast amount of essential oils, modes of application, and effective concentrations of the essential oils suggest there are more opportunities for essential oils to be utilized in commercial livestock production and veterinary medicine. The objective of this review is to contribute to the understanding of the value that essential oils can provide to the ruminant diet and to examine the biological impact of various essential oils on economically important production traits of ruminant species.

Successful immune tolerance induction to enzyme replacement therapy in CRIM-negative infantile Pompe disease.

PURPOSE: Infantile Pompe disease resulting from a deficiency of lysosomal acid α-glucosidase (GAA) requires enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human GAA (rhGAA). Cross-reactive immunologic material negative (CRIM-negative) Pompe patients develop high-titer antibody to the rhGAA and do poorly. We describe successful tolerance induction in CRIM-negative patients. METHODS: Two CRIM-negative patients with preexisting anti-GAA antibodies were treated therapeutically with rituximab, methotrexate, and gammaglobulins. Two additional CRIM-negative patients were treated prophylactically with a short course of rituximab and methotrexate, in parallel with initiating rhGAA. RESULTS: In both patients treated therapeutically, anti-rhGAA was eliminated after 3 and 19 months. All four patients are immune tolerant to rhGAA, off immune therapy, showing B-cell recovery while continuing to receive ERT at ages 36 and 56 months (therapeutic) and 18 and 35 months (prophylactic). All patients show clinical response to ERT, in stark contrast to the rapid deterioration of their nontolerized CRIM-negative counterparts. CONCLUSION: The combination of rituximab with methotrexate ± intravenous gammaglobulins (IVIG) is an option for tolerance induction of CRIM-negative Pompe to ERT when instituted in the naïve setting or following antibody development. It should be considered in other conditions in which antibody response to the therapeutic protein elicits robust antibody response that interferes with product efficacy.

High prevalence of array comparative genomic hybridization abnormalities in adults with unexplained intellectual disability.

PURPOSE: Array comparative genomic hybridization is now a widely used clinical tool for the evaluation of intellectual disability. The current 10% yield of positive findings is based largely on pediatric data. Adults with unexplained intellectual disability have not been systematically studied with array comparative genomic hybridization. Here, we report our initial experience with array comparative genomic hybridization testing on 45 adults with unexplained intellectual disability referred to an adult genetics clinic. METHODS: Beginning in 2006, we applied clinically available array comparative genomic hybridization testing to adults referred with an intellectual disability phenotype. The initial platform used was an early generation targeted or constitutional array, which was replaced by our current platform using more than 5000 bacterial artificial chromosome clones with an average resolution of 500 Kb and targeting 114 disease loci. All patients also underwent high-resolution karyotype analysis and molecular testing for Fragile X syndrome. RESULTS: Our population comprised 45 patients with unexplained intellectual disability (18 men and 27 women) with an average age of 35.1 years. Most patients had not been evaluated by genetics clinics since childhood or had never undergone a genetic evaluation; only two had documentation of prior normal karyotype studies. Three subjects had abnormal high-resolution chromosome studies, which were also confirmed by array comparative genomic hybridization. Seven of the remaining 42 patients (17%) had novel genomic losses identified only by array comparative genomic hybridization. CONCLUSION: Abnormal genomic losses detected by array comparative genomic hybridization are prevalent in adults with unexplained intellectual disability. Our data showing abnormalities in 22% and 17% of overall patients and of cases with normal karyotypes, respectively, suggest that the yield of array comparative genomic hybridization in adults with unexplained intellectual disability may be higher than in pediatric populations.