Adverse Events Reported by Patients With Cancer After Administration of a 2-Dose mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Most safety and efficacy trials of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines excluded patients with cancer, yet these patients are more likely than healthy individuals to contract SARS-CoV-2 and more likely to become seriously ill after infection. Our objective was to record short-term adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer, to compare the magnitude and duration of these reactions with those of patients without cancer, and to determine whether adverse reactions are related to active cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-institution observational study was performed at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. All study participants received 2 doses of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine separated by approximately 3 weeks. A report of adverse reactions to dose 1 of the vaccine was completed upon return to the clinic for dose 2. Participants completed an identical survey either online or by telephone 2 weeks after the second vaccine dose. RESULTS: The cohort of 1,753 patients included 67.5% who had a history of cancer and 12.0% who were receiving active cancer treatment. Local pain at the injection site was the most frequently reported symptom for all respondents and did not distinguish patients with cancer from those without cancer after either dose 1 (39.3% vs 43.9%; P=.07) or dose 2 (42.5% vs 40.3%; P=.45). Among patients with cancer, those receiving active treatment were less likely to report pain at the injection site after dose 1 compared with those not receiving active treatment (30.0% vs 41.4%; P=.002). The onset and duration of adverse events was otherwise unrelated to active cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: When patients with cancer were compared with those without cancer, few differences in reported adverse events were noted. Active cancer treatment had little impact on adverse event profiles.

The Role of Malnutrition and Muscle Wasting in Advanced Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Malnutrition, cancer cachexia, and sarcopenia often co-occur in patients with advanced cancer and are associated with poorer response to chemotherapy and reduced survival. Here, we evaluate the current literature regarding the role of nutrition and these associated conditions in patients with advanced lung cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: While rates of malnutrition are high, nutritional intervention studies have generally been limited by small sample sizes. Novel strategies such as home-based meal delivery may have promise. While no therapy is approved for cancer cachexia, ghrelin agonists and other targeted therapies have yielded promising data in clinical trials. Recent data also suggest that obesity may improve immunotherapy responsiveness. Malnutrition and associated muscle wasting are clearly negative prognostic markers in advanced lung cancer. Patients with malnutrition should be urgently referred for dietary counseling and guidelines for nutritional support should be followed. Optimal treatment of these syndromes will likely include nutrition and anti-cachexia interventions used in combination.

The impact of an oncology urgent care center on health-care utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that many emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for patients with cancer may be preventable. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has implemented changes to the hospital outpatient reporting program that targets acute care in-treatment patients for preventable conditions. Oncology urgent care centers aim to streamline patient care. Our cancer center developed an urgent care center called the direct referral unit in 2011. METHODS: We abstracted visits to our adjacent hospital ED and direct referral unit from January 2014 to June 2018. Patient demographics, cancer and visit diagnoses, visit charges, and 30-day therapy utilization were assessed. RESULTS: An analysis of 13 114 visits demonstrated that increased direct referral unit utilization was associated with decreased monthly ED visits (P < .001). Common direct referral unit visit diagnoses were dehydration, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and fever. Patients receiving active cancer treatment more frequently presented to the direct referral unit (P < .001). The average charges were $2221 for the direct referral unit and $10 261 for the ED. CONCLUSION: The association of decreased ED visits with increased direct referral unit utilization demonstrates the potential for urgent care centers to reduce acute care visits. Many patients presented to our direct referral unit with preventable conditions, and these visits were associated with considerable cost savings, supporting its use as a cost-effective method to reduce acute care costs.

Deciding on the duration of adjuvant therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Introduction: The benefit of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib mesylate in metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) leads to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Clinical trials of adjuvant imatinib have provided data on the utility in management of primary GIST. There still remains uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of therapy.Areas covered: Here, we review the literature on the pivotal clinical trials evaluating adjuvant imatinib: ACOSOG Z9000/Z9001, EORTC 62024, Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII, and PERSIST-5. The data from these studies that were analyzed included the patient population, length of therapy, and outcomes.Expert opinion: Clinical trial data demonstrate that adjuvant imatinib delays recurrence and appears to improve survival when taken for 3 years in high-risk patients; treatment for 5 years has been found to be safe, although difficult for patients to maintain adherence. These studies all incorporated slightly different patient populations based upon eligibility criteria for risk of recurrence, but support the use in patients with intermediate to high risk of disease recurrence. Data from these studies does not support treating those with low risk of recurrence or imatinib-insensitive mutations.

Palliative TACE for hepatic metastases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

We describe the case of a man with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) and numerous metastatic lesions restricted to the liver. Despite extensive courses of various systemic targeted chemotherapies, progressive disease was noted on CT and MRI and the patient suffered from persistent abdominal pain associated with his metastatic lesions. The liver lesions and associated symptoms were effectively palliated with serial transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). While it is unclear if TACE has impacted his overall survival, this case encourages the use of TACE for palliative intent for patients with metastatic chRCC.

The fear of lymphadenopathy: A cautionary case of sarcoidosis masquerading as recurrent diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

We describe the cautionary case of a patient with advanced-stage large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). After combination chemotherapy, CT-PET revealed a persistent focus of likely DLBCL for which he received radiotherapy. Follow-up CT-PET showed diffuse hypermetabolic adenopathy and recurrent DLBCL was presumed. As part of clinical trial assessment, multiple biopsies showed non-caseating lymphadenitis consistent with sarcoidosis. No treatment for asymptomatic sarcoidosis was required and 18 months later he remains cancer-free. The presentation of sarcoidosis masquerading as recurrent DLBCL highlights the importance of tissue sampling prior to engaging in toxic and potentially life-threatening chemotherapy and the interesting link between DLBCL and sarcoidosis.