Effect of menstrual cycle and menopause on human gastric electrophysiology.

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms disproportionately affect females of childbearing age; however, the effect of menstrual cycling on gastric electrophysiology is poorly defined. To establish the effect of the menstrual cycle on gastric electrophysiology, healthy subjects underwent noninvasive Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM; 8x8 array) with the validated symptom logging App (Gastric Alimetry, New Zealand). Participants included were premenopausal females in follicular (n = 26) and luteal phases (n = 18) and postmenopausal females (n = 30) and males (n = 51) were controls. Principal gastric frequency (PGF), body mass index (BMI) adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI), Fed:Fasted Amplitude Ratio (ff-AR), meal response curves, and symptom burden were analyzed. Menstrual cycle-related electrophysiological changes were then transferred to an established anatomically accurate computational gastric fluid dynamics model (meal viscosity 0.1 Pas) to predict the impact on gastric mixing and emptying. PGF was significantly higher in the luteal versus follicular phase [mean 3.21 cpm, SD (0.17) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), P < 0.001] and versus males [3.01 cpm, SD (0.2), P < 0.001]. In the computational model, this translated to 8.1% higher gastric mixing strength and 5.3% faster gastric emptying for luteal versus follicular phases. Postmenopausal females also exhibited higher PGF than females in the follicular phase [3.10 cpm, SD (0.24) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), P = 0.01], and higher BMI-adjusted amplitude [40.7 µV (33.02-52.58) vs. 29.6 µV (26.15-39.65), P < 0.001], GA-RI [0.60 (0.48-0.73) vs. 0.43 (0.30-0.60), P = 0.005], and ff-AR [2.51 (1.79-3.47) vs. 1.48 (1.21-2.17), P = 0.001] than males. There were no differences in symptoms. These results define variations in gastric electrophysiology with regard to human menstrual cycling and menopause.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study evaluates gastric electrophysiology in relation to the menstrual cycle using a novel noninvasive high-resolution methodology, revealing substantial variations in gastric activity with menstrual cycling and menopause. Gastric slow-wave frequency is significantly higher in the luteal versus follicular menstrual phase. Computational modeling predicts that this difference translates to higher rates of gastric mixing and liquid emptying in the luteal phase, which is consistent with previous experimental data evaluating menstrual cycling effects on gastric emptying.

Neonatal and maternal outcomes at early vs. full term following induction of labor; A secondary analysis of the OBLIGE randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Birth at early term (37+0-38+6 completed gestational weeks [GW] and additional days) is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes compared with waiting to ≥39 GW. Most studies report outcomes after elective cesarean section or a mix of all modes of births; it is unclear whether these adverse outcomes apply to early-term babies born after induction of labor (IOL). We aimed to determine, in women with a non-urgent induction indication (elective/planned >48 h in advance), if IOL at early and late term was associated with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes compared with IOL at full term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational cohort study as a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 1087 New Zealand women with a planned IOL ≥37+0 GW. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze neonatal and maternal outcomes in relation to gestational age; 37+0-38+6 (early term), 39+0-40+6 (full term) and ≥41+0 (late term) GW. Neonatal outcome analyses were adjusted for sex, birthweight, mode of birth and induction indication, and maternal outcome analyses for parity, age, body mass index and induction method. The primary neonatal outcome was admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for >4 hours; the primary maternal outcome was cesarean section. RESULTS: Among the 1087 participants, 266 had IOL at early term, 480 at full term, and 341 at late term. Babies born following IOL at early term had increased odds for NICU admission for >4 hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16-4.05), compared with full term. Women having IOL at early term had no difference in emergency cesarean rates but had an increased need for a second induction method (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.15-2.51) and spent 4 h longer from start of IOL to birth (Hodges-Lehmann estimator 4.10, 95% CI 1.33-6.95) compared with those with IOL at full term. CONCLUSIONS: IOL for a non-urgent indication at early term was associated with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes and no benefits compared with IOL at full term. These findings support international guidelines to avoid IOL before 39 GW unless there is an evidence-based indication for earlier planned birth and will help inform women and clinicians in their decision-making about timing of IOL.