Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Mastectomy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison Using the National Cancer Database.

INTRODUCTION: Current recommendations for early-stage breast cancer are largely based on the NSABP B-06 trial demonstrating equivalent survival between mastectomy and lumpectomy. We sought to compare breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with mastectomy for treatment of early-stage breast cancer in a contemporary patient population. METHODS: A query of the NCDB PUF identified female breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. Patients with stage I or II disease were included. BCT was defined as the receipt of lumpectomy plus radiation. Propensity scores were tabulated using race, age, Charlson/Deyo score, tumor site, laterality, histology, grade, size, number of nodes positive, lymph-vascular invasion, receptor status, receipt of chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Patients who received BCT versus mastectomy were matched using a 1:1 nearest neighbor technique. The primary outcome measured was overall survival. RESULTS: After exclusions and matching, two equal groups of 101,118 patients remained. Median follow-up was 42 months. The majority had invasive ductal histology (77%), and node-negative disease (84%). Receptor status included ER-positive (83%), PR-positive (73%), and HER2/Neu-positive (15%). Chemotherapy was received in 38% and endocrine therapy in 71%. Propensity score matching yielded equivalent groups across all target variables. The 5-year overall survival was superior for BCT compared with mastectomy (92.9% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). This survival advantage persisted for both stage I (p < 0.001) and stage II (p < 0.001) disease on subgroup analysis. Fig. 1 Overall survival in female patients with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I or II) undergoing breast conservation surgery with radiation compared with mastectomy. BCS breast conservation surgery CONCLUSIONS: BCT is associated with superior overall survival compared with mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer using well-matched, contemporary data.

Timing of mastectomy and the effect on the likelihood of outpatient surgery and cost savings in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after mastectomy has potential patient- and hospital-level benefits; however, few data are available regarding factors affecting the likelihood of same-day discharge in order to address barriers. We sought to evaluate factors contributing to same-day discharge, focusing on the timing of mastectomy during the operative day. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomies for malignancy over a 3-y time frame. Clinicopathologic variables were collected along with a binary variable for mastectomy start time (morning versus afternoon). Our primary endpoint was rate of same-day discharge. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed from significant univariate variables to determine independent predictors of same-day discharge. A secondary endpoint was a cost-utility analysis for morning versus afternoon start time, using hospital cost data. RESULTS: There were 451 patients included in the analysis. Factors associated with same-day discharge rate included the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, use of a preoperative regional anesthesia block, type of mastectomy performed, individual surgeon variation, and a morning start for the mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, morning start was a strong independent predictor of same-day discharge (odd ratio = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.75-4.60). The cost-utility analysis favored a morning start, with average cost savings of $550 per patient. CONCLUSION: Despite patient- and surgeon-specific variations, simple scheduling policies can improve same-day discharge rates after mastectomy, leading to improved hospital bed use and cost reduction.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Extent of Axillary Surgery for Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancers of Triple-Negative and HER2-Overexpressing Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients with triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing phenotypes are recommended to receive chemotherapy for primary tumors greater than 1 cm regardless of nodal status. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may eradicate subclinical nodal metastases and reduce the extent of axillary surgery performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A query of the National Cancer Database Participant User File was performed for new cases of female breast cancer from 2012 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were clinical N0 status, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of axillary surgery. Exclusions included hormone-positive/HER2-negative tumors and/or distant metastatic disease. Subjects were divided into groups by receipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was the extent of axillary surgery, defined as sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of tumor phenotype and surgery of the primary site. RESULTS: A total of 66,771 female patients were included, 15,967 of whom underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ALND rates were higher in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (30.6% vs. 28.8%, P < .001). Among tumor phenotypes, the extent of axillary surgery was reduced most significantly for hormone-negative, HER2-positive disease (30.0% vs. 25.8%, P < .001). ALND rates were more substantially reduced for patients who underwent mastectomy (41.3% vs. 36.1%, P < .001) compared to partial mastectomy (21.8% vs. 20.1%, P = .002). Adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent predictor of ALND (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.33). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the extent of axillary surgery in clinically node-negative, nonluminal breast cancers.