Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Stroke ; : 17474930241270483, 2024 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke risks associated with rapid climate change remain controversial due to a paucity of evidence. AIMS: To examine the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and ischemic stroke (IS) associated with meteorological parameters. METHODS: In this time-stratified case-crossover study, adult patients hospitalized for their first stroke between 2011 and 2020 from the insurance claims data in Taiwan were identified. The hospitalization day was designated as the case period, and three or four control periods were matched by the same day of the week and month of each case period. Daily mean and 24-hour variations in ambient temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, and apparent temperature were measured. Conditional logistic regression models were applied to assess the risk of stroke associated with exposure to weather variables, using the third quintile as a reference, controlling for air pollutant levels. RESULTS: There were 7161 patients with SAH, 40,426 patients with ICH, and 107,550 patients with IS. There was an inverse linear relationship between mean daily temperature and apparent temperature with ICH. Elevated mean daily atmospheric pressure was associated with an increased risk of ICH. A greater decrease in apparent temperature over a 24-hour period was associated with increased risk of ICH but decreased risk of IS (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for the first vs. third quintile of changes in apparent temperature, 1.141 [1.053-1.237] and 0.946 [0.899-0.996], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were considerable differences in short-term associations between meteorological parameters and three main pathological types of strokes.Data access statement: The authors have no permission to share the data.

2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(5)2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793725

RESUMO

Real-world clinical experience of using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients has rarely been reported. In this study, we aimed to perform a retrospective multicenter clinical analysis of extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Between November 2018 and March 2022, 72 extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy, according to the cancer center databases of Linkou, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals, were retrospectively included in the analysis. Twenty-one patients (29.2%) received atezolizumab and fifty-one (70.8%) received durvalumab. Objective response (OR) and disease control (DC) rates of 59.7% and 73.6%, respectively, were observed with first-line ICI plus chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.63 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.25-8.02), and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.07 months (95% CI, 15.12-17.0) in all study patients. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; >4) and a high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration (>260 UL) were identified as independent unfavorable factors associated with shorter OS in the multivariate analysis. Regarding safety, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (AE), but no treatment-related deaths occurred in the study patients. First-line anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy are effective and safe for male extensive-stage SCLC patients. Further therapeutic strategies may need to be developed for patients with unfavorable outcomes (e.g., baseline high NLR and serum LDH level).

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(24)2022 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36555926

RESUMO

Late-onset asthma (LOA) differs from early-onset asthma (EOA) in terms of prognosis and the treatment response because it has a much worse prognosis and a poorer response to standard asthma treatment. This study sought to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of asthma patients with phenotypes distinguished by age at onset and atopy status. We prospectively recruited patients with asthma who were registered in a pay-for-performance program operated by Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). These patients received regular outpatient treatment for at least 1 year at every outpatient clinic visit since 2019. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with LOA (≥40 years) and those with EOA (<40 years). Of the consecutive 101 patients with asthma, 21 patients (20.7%) had EOA and 80 (79.3%) had LOA. In the 12-month period, patients with EOA had higher declines in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1; −2.1 ± 8.4 vs. 6.8 ± 13.1, % of predicted value, p = 0.037) and forced vital capacity (FVC; −4.6 ± 12.0 vs. 6.1 ± 13.6, % of predicted value, p = 0.023) than patients with LOA. Patients with nonatopic EOA had a significantly higher exacerbation rate at 12 months than patients with nonatopic LOA (50% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.012). Identification of different phenotypes of asthma is important in clinical practice because treatment responses may differ.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA