Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in systemic therapies.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is traditionally associated with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Sorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was introduced in 2007 as a first-in-class systemic agent for advanced HCC. After sorafenib, a range of targeted therapies and immunotherapies have demonstrated survival benefits in the past 5 years, revolutionizing the treatment landscape of advanced HCC. More recently, evidence of novel combinations of systemic agents with distinct mechanisms has emerged. In particular, combination trials on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab have shown encouraging efficacy. Hence, international societies have revamped their guidelines to incorporate new recommendations for these novel systemic agents. Aside from treatment in advanced HCC, the indications for systemic therapy are expanding. For example, the combination of systemic therapeutics with locoregional therapy (trans-arterial chemoembolization or stereotactic body radiation therapy) has demonstrated promising early results in downstaging HCC. Recent trials have also explored the role of systemic therapy as neoadjuvant treatment for borderline-resectable HCC or as adjuvant treatment to reduce recurrence risk after curative resection. Despite encouraging results from clinical trials, the real-world efficacy of systemic agents in specific patient subgroups (such as patients with advanced cirrhosis, high bleeding risk, renal impairment, or cardiometabolic diseases) remains uncertain. The effect of liver disease etiology on systemic treatment efficacy warrants further research. With an increased understanding of the pathophysiological pathways and accumulation of clinical data, personalized treatment decisions will be possible, and the field of systemic treatment for HCC will continue to evolve.

Pilot model of hepatitis C virus micro-elimination in high-risk populations in Hong Kong: Barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: Although the general seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Hong Kong is <0.5 %, Hong Kong is still striving for HCV elimination owing to barriers in care cascade encompassing linkage-to-care (LTC), treatment initiation and adherence. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a pilot model of micro-elimination to strengthen the HCV care cascade for high-risk groups in Hong Kong. METHODS: We initiated the pilot Conquering Hepatitis vIa Micro-Elimination (CHIME) program which adopts an integrated care approach involving outreach visits to halfway house or drug rehabilitation centers run by non-governmental organizations. Participants with history of injection drug use (PWID), recreational drug use, or imprisonment were included. We performed point-of-care test for anti-HCV with reflex HCV RNA testing. LTC with government-subsidized direct acting antiviral was provided to viremic participants. We compared the impact on the care cascade with a cohort of HCV patients (17.8 % PWID) under usual care. RESULTS: 396 participants (62.9 % PWID) were screened and 187 (47.2 %) were viremic, of which 29.8 % had cirrhosis. Proportion with LTC, treatment initiation and adherence were 76.5 % and 63.7 %, 90.9 % and 85.8 %, and 90.0 % and 92.2 %, for the CHIME program and usual care, respectively. The CHIME program was significantly associated with higher odds of LTC (OR 1.797, 95 % CI 1.221-2.644). Non-engagement in care (affecting 37.9 % participants with HCV viremia) was associated with unemployment (OR 2.165, 95 % CI 1.118-4.190). CONCLUSION: The pilot CHIME program demonstrated feasibility of an integrated approach to consolidate the HCV care cascade in high-risk populations in Hong Kong.