Treatment of neurofibromatosis 1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a systematic review.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are a rare and aggressive group of tumors that are challenging to treat. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1)-associated MPNSTs have been associated with poorer clinical outcomes. The treatment options for NF-1-associated MPNSTs broadly include surgery (SG), chemotherapy (CT), and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Overall, the role and efficacy of CT and RT are unclear. Examination of existing literature for studies reporting on NF-1-associated MPNSTs and respective treatment-related outcomes was conducted. We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines in PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases of studies which reported treatment-specific outcomes in NF-1-associated MPNSTs. The literature search found 444 records after removal of duplicates. The present study included 50 patients across 12 observational studies. All of the included studies reported data on overall survival (OS 52%, n = 26/50) but mean follow-up in months among the studies and among patients varied widely, between 10.85 (SD, ± 10.38) and 192 (SD, ± 98.22). From the included studies, patients underwent either SG alone (n = 21), SG + CT (n = 10), SG + RT (n = 7), or SG + CT + RT (n = 12). The quality of evidence in the literature regarding optimal treatment options for NF-1-associated MPNSTs remains tenuous. Future retrospective and prospective comparative trials should consider adherence to a set of reporting guidelines to improve the quality of evidence in the literature with respect to individual treatment-related outcomes. The need for prospective multi-institutional efforts cannot be overstated.

First-Line Stent Retriever versus Direct Aspiration for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation stroke has been proven to be highly effective. In comparison, MT for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) continues to lack definitive evidence of efficacy. The main MT modalities are stent retriever (SR) and direct aspiration (DA). Several studies have been published comparing the 2 approaches. OBJECTIVE: We sought to directly compare and synthesize safety and efficacy outcomes with SR versus DA for acute BAO. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 8 studies comprising 693 patients with BAO were included (SR: 457; DA: 236). The SR group was associated with statistically significant lower odds of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.94) and mTICI3 (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.23-0.95) compared with DA. Favorable outcome rates were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.60-1.16). The rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR: 3.57; 95% CI: 0.75-16.95), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (OR: 4.71; 95% CI: 0.82-26.90), and vessel perforation (OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 0.43-16.33) were higher in the SR group, but statistical significance was not reached. The rates of 90-day mortality were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.67-1.70). Procedure duration was significantly shorter when DA was used compared with SR (weighted mean difference: 26.10 minutes; 95% CI: 13.28-38.92). CONCLUSIONS: SR is associated with statistically significant lower odds of mTICI 2b/3 and mTICI 3 recanalization rates compared with DA. SR appears to be associated with a higher complication rate, but significance was not reached.

Percutaneous Surgical Approaches in Multiple Sclerosis-Related Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in the setting of multiple sclerosis (MS) is reported to be 20-fold higher than in the general population. In these patients, TN can be medically refractory and often requires neurosurgical interventions. Ablative percutaneous approaches such as balloon compression (BC), glycerol rhizolysis (GR), and radiofrequency ablation (RF) can be used and often provide rapid pain relief. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy profile of these approaches. METHODS: This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Five studies with 481 percutaneous approaches were included. No differences in terms of immediate pain relief were identified between BC and GR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.71). BC was associated with statistically significant higher odds of postoperative mastication weakness compared to GR (OR: 8.58; 95% CI: 1.52-48.43). The rates of pain recurrence (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.04-40.12), hypoesthesia (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.51-1.87), and reduced corneal reflex (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.18-6.17) were similar between BC and GR. In addition, no differences in terms of immediate pain relief (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.77-5.27), pain recurrence (OR: 5.37; 95% CI: 0.30-97.43), and hypoesthesia (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.02-17.66) were identified between RF and GR. The comparison between BC versus RF showed similar rates of immediate pain relief (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.10-2.44), pain recurrence (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0-325.96), and hypoesthesia (OR: 2.63; 95%CI: 0.01-735.71). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the immediate pain relief rates between BC, GR, and RF in MS patients were found. However, BC was associated with a higher risk of postoperative mastication weakness compared with GR.

Revascularization approaches in patients with radiation-induced carotid stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation remains a well-known risk factor of carotid artery stenosis. The survival rates of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy have risen owing to medical advancements in the field. As a consequence, the incidence of carotid artery stenosis in these high-risk patients has increased. AIMS: In this study we sought to compare the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vs carotid artery stenting (CAS) for radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central until July 2020. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. The I-square statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven studies and 201 patients were included. Periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death rates were similar between the two revascularization approaches. However, the risk for cranial nerve (CN) injury was higher in the CEA group (OR, 7.40; 95% CI, 1.58-34.59; I2 = 0%). Analysis revealed no significant difference in terms of long-term mortality (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.14-1.16; I2 = 0%) and restenosis rates (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.29-1.66; I2 = 0%) between CEA and CAS after a mean follow-up of 40.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: CAS and CEA appear to have a similar safety and efficacy profile in patients with radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis. Patients treated with CEA have a higher risk for periprocedural CN injuries. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these results.

Carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) treatment approaches: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of transarterial and transvenous embolization for direct and indirect CCFs.

BACKGROUND: Carotid Cavernous Fistulas (CCFs) are the result of an abnormal communication between the carotid artery and its branches and the venous system of the cavernous sinus. The mainstay of therapy for CCFs consists of transarterial or transvenous embolization, while other treatment options such as open surgery or radiosurgery are still utilized as second-line or adjuvant therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to systematically review and summarize available data regarding short- and long-term outcomes of all available treatment modalities for CCFs. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies comprising 1575 patients were included in this systematic review. Transarterial embolization for direct and indirect CCFs offered a complete obliteration rate of 93.93% (N = 589/627) and 81.51% (N = 119/146), respectively. Transvenous embolization for direct and indirect lesions achieved obliteration in 91.67% (N = 33/36) and 86.03% (N = 425/494) of patients, respectively. Comparison between transarterial and transvenous embolization did not reveal statistically significant differences in terms of fistula obliteration for direct (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.23-8.90; I2 0.0%) and indirect CCFs (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.31-1.23; I2 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular embolization techniques are the preferred treatment modality for the management of CCFs. No differences were identified between transarterial and transvenous embolization by synthesizing studies with available data. Future prospective cohorts are warranted to compare the different materials and techniques implemented especially within the rapidly expanding realm of endovascular approaches.

Comparative safety and efficacy of percutaneous approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include glycerol rhizotomy (GR), radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF), and balloon compression (BC), which aim to provide pain relief by targeted injury to the trigeminal nerve pain fibers. All three techniques are well established and can provide immediate pain relief; however each of them can be associated with a range of complications. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of GR, RF and BC in patients with TN. This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted. Fourteen studies were included. The comparisons of RF vs GR comprised 2,518 patients overall. RF was associated with statistically significant higher odds of immediate pain relief (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.29-5.44; I 2:85.5%) when compared to GR. Patients in the RF group had a statistically significant higher risk of anesthesia in the trigeminal distribution (OR: 4.73; 95% CI: 2.25-9.96; I2:0%) and lower risk for herpes eruption (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.17-0.56; I2 :0%). The comparison of BC vs GR included 961 patients. Patients in the BC group had a statistically significant higher risk of mastication weakness (OR: 9.29; 95% CI: 2.71-31.86; I2:0%) and diplopia due to CN IV or CN V palsy (OR: 6.31; 95% CI: 1.70-23.33; I2 :0%) compared to patients in the GR group. The comparisons of BC vs RF comprised 3,183 patients and did not show significant differences between the two groups. RF is associated with statistically significant higher odds for immediate pain relief and anesthesia and lower risk for post-operative herpes eruption as compared to GR. Patients in the BC group had a statistically significant higher risk to develop post-operative mastication weakness and diplopia when compared to GR.

Role of Preoperative Embolization in Carotid Body Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are highly vascularized tumors which can render tumor resection surgery challenging. There is evidence suggesting that preoperative selective embolization can reduce blood loss during surgery and decrease the risk of perioperative complications; however, recent reports have questioned the benefits that preoperative embolization provides. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of preoperative embolization on CBT surgical resection. METHODS: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until March 2019. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies comprising 1326 patients were included. Patients who received preoperative embolization had statistically significant lower intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD], -135.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], -224.58 to -46.06; I2 = 78.6%). Duration of the procedure was statistically significantly shorter in the preembolization group than the nonembolization group (WMD, -38.61; 95% CI, -65.61 to -11.62; I2 = 71.9%). There were no differences in the rates of cranial nerve (CN) injuries (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.68-1.86; I2 = 12.9%), stroke (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.70-4.36; I2 = 0%), transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.11-2.65; I2 = 0%), or length of stay (WMD, 0.32; 95% CI, -1.35 to 1.98; I2 = 96.4%) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received embolization prior to CBT resection had statistically significant lower blood loss and shorter duration of operation. The rates of CN palsy, stroke, TIA, and length of stay were similar between patients who had preoperative embolization and those who did not.