The Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes in Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer.

PURPOSE: To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for commonly used patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in recurrent patellar instability patients after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer (TTT), and to determine the impact of potential prognostic factors on the likelihood of achieving these values. METHODS: From April 2015 to February 2021, patients who underwent MPFLR and TTT were retrospectively reviewed. PROs included Kujala, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS), Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner score. Relevant anchor questions were provided. A distribution- or anchor-based method was adopted to determine the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was included to confirm the validity. Univariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were included. The MCID were 9.1 (Kujala), 11.1 (Lysholm), 0.9 (Tegner), 9.9 (IKDC), 9.0 (KOOS-Pain), 10.8 (KOOS-Symptoms), 10.0 (KOOS-Activities of Daily Living [ADL]), 17.8 (KOOS-Sports and Recreation [Sports/Rec]), and 12.7 (KOOS-Quality of Life [QoL]). The SCB were 14.5 (Kujala), 12.5 (Lysholm), 1.5 (Tegner), 14.5 (IKDC), 13.9 (KOOS-Pain), 14.3 (KOOS-Symptoms), 18.4 (KOOS-ADL), 47.5 (KOOS-Sports/Rec), and 15.0 (KOOS-QoL). The PASSs were 85.5 (Kujala), 75.5 (Lysholm), 3.5 (Tegner), 73.2 (IKDC), 87.5 (KOOS-Pain), 73.2 (KOOS-Symptoms), 92.0 (KOOS-ADL), 77.5 (KOOS-Sports/Rec), and 53.1 (KOOS-QoL). All SCBs were valid except KOOS-QoL. All MCIDs were valid at the 95% confidence interval (CI) except KOOS scores, the majority of which were valid at the 90% CI. A younger age was an independent prognostic factor of reaching PASS for Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, and KOOS-ADL score. A higher baseline score was a negative prognostic factor for achieving MCID or SCB but had a slightly positive influence on the achievement of PASS. CONCLUSIONS: This study established the MCID, SCB, and PASS for commonly used PROs and confirmed their validity in recurrent patellar instability patients after MPFLR and TTT. Younger age and lower baseline scores were prognostic factors of achieving MCID and SCB, whereas patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to report satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Symmetry in knee arthrokinematics in healthy collegiate athletes during fast running and drop jump revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

OBJECTIVE: Changes in cartilage contact area and/or contact location after knee injury can initiate and exacerbate cartilage degeneration. Typically, the contralateral knee is used as a surrogate for native cartilage contact patterns on the injured knee. However, symmetry in cartilage contact patterns between healthy knees during high-impact activities is unknown. METHOD: Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured on 19 collegiate athletes during fast running and drop jump using dynamic biplane radiography and a validated registration process that matched computed tomography (CT)-based bone models to the biplane radiographs. Cartilage contact area and location were measured with participant-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based cartilage models superimposed on the CT-based bone models. Symmetry in cartilage contact area and location was assessed by the absolute side-to-side differences (SSD) within participants. RESULTS: The SSD in contact area during running (7.7 ± 6.1% and 8.0 ± 4.6% in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively) was greater than during drop jump (4.2 ± 3.7% and 5.7 ± 2.6%, respectively) (95% CI of the difference: medial [2.4%, 6.6%], lateral [1.5%, 4.9%]). The average SSD in contact location was 3.5 mm or less in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and 2.1 mm or less in the medial-lateral (ML) direction on the femur and tibia for both activities. The SSD in AP contact location on the femur was greater during running than during drop jump (95% CI of the difference: medial [1.6 mm, 3.6 mm], lateral [0.6 mm, 1.9 mm]). CONCLUSION: This study provides context for interpreting results from previous studies on tibiofemoral arthrokinematics. Previously reported differences between ligament-repaired and contralateral knee arthrokinematics fall within the range of typical SSDs observed in healthy athletes. Previously reported arthrokinematics differences that exceed SSDs found in these healthy athletes occur only in the presence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency or meniscectomy.

Prevalence and a correlation analysis of discoid meniscus and femoral trochlear dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Discoid meniscus (DM) and femoral trochlear dysplasia (FTD) are common knee disorders. Both as congenital malformation, whether there is a connection between them is unclear and the research on their prevalence in the general population is inadequate. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population through a large sample size, and to explore the relationship between them. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations at our outpatient clinic were screened and 1003 patients were enrolled in DM group with 989 patients in non-DM (NDM) group. The type of DM and FTD was classified with Watanabe classification and Dejour's classification, respectively. The prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population and the relationship between them were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of DM and FTD was 10.0% and 14.5%, respectively. The overall percentage of FTD was higher in DM group (P < 0.001). The DM group has a higher percentage of all types of FTD except type D (P < 0.05), and a higher percentage of both low- and high-grade FTD (P < 0.001). There were 633 cases of type I DM and 370 cases of type II DM. The overall percentage of FTD was not significantly different between the two types (P = 0.106). No significant difference was detected for all types of FTD except type B (P < 0.05). The Type I DM group has a significant higher percentage of high-grade FTD than Type II group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with a DM are more likely to have FTD regardless of the type of DM, while those with a type I DM are more prone to have a high grade FTD.

Arthroscopic Dynamic Anterior Stabilization Using Either Long Head of the Biceps or Conjoined Tendon Transfer for Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in a Similarly Low Recurrence Rate.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) between transferring the long head of the biceps (DAS-LHB) and the conjoined tendon (DAS-CT) for anterior shoulder instability with <15% glenoid bone loss. METHODS: From January 2016 to May 2019, a total of 63 patients who underwent DAS for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with <15% glenoid bone loss were included, comprising 33 patients in DAS-LHB group and 30 patients in DAS-CT group. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 3-year follow-up, including patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and return to sports (RTS). Postoperative recurrent instability (including dislocation, subluxation, and subjective instability with a positive apprehension test), revisions and complications also were recorded. RESULTS: No significant demographic characteristics difference was detected between the DAS-LHB (26.3 ± 7.9 years) and DAS-CT groups (26.0 ± 6.7 years). At the latest follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in functional scores: Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (14.8 ± 2.8 vs 15.2 ± 3.6), Rowe score (95.9 ± 6.5 vs 93.2 ± 10.2), visual analog scale for pain (0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.7 ± 1.7), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (95 ± 8.8 vs 95.2 ± 9.1) (all P > .218). No significant difference was detected between groups in the rates of RTS (90.1% vs 86.7%, P = .700) and RTS at previous level (78.7% vs 73.3%, P = .258), respectively. No recurrent dislocation occurred in either group. One patient felt occasional subluxation in the DAS-LHB group, and one was positive for the apprehension test in each group. One patient presented with postoperative shoulder stiffness and underwent a secondary arthroscopic debridement in the DAS-CT group. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable rates of recurrence, complication, return to sports, and subjective shoulder function were observed between DAS-LHB and DAS-CT groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Posterior tibial slope and meniscal slope correlate with in vivo tibial internal rotation during running and drop jump.

PURPOSE: The relationship between tibial bony and meniscus anatomy and knee kinematics during in vivo, high-impact activities remains unclear. This study aimed to determine if the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and meniscal slope (MS) are associated with in vivo anterior-posterior translation and internal tibia rotation during running and double-leg drop jumps in healthy knees. METHODS: Nineteen collegiate athletes performed fast running at 5.0 m/s on an instrumented treadmill and double-leg drop jump from a 60 cm platform while biplane radiographs of the knee were acquired at 150 Hz. Tibiofemoral kinematics were determined using a validated model-based tracking process. Medial and lateral PTS and MS were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: In fast running, more internal tibia rotation was associated with greater PTS (ρ = 0.336, P = 0.039) and MS (ρ = 0.405, P = 0.012) in the medial knee compartment. In the double-leg drop jump, more internal tibia rotation was associated with greater PTS (ρ = 0.431, P = 0.007) and MS (ρ = 0.323, P = 0.005) in the medial knee compartment, as well as a greater PTS in the lateral knee compartment (ρ = 0.445, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the medial and lateral PTS and medial MS are associated with the amount of knee rotation during high-impact activities. These in vivo findings improve our understanding of ACL injury risk by linking bone and meniscus morphology to dynamic kinematics.

[Application of Digital Therapy in Post-operative Rehabilitation of Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction].

OBJECTIVE: Digital therapy is important in treating motor system disease. The outcome of digital therapy in post-operative rehabilitation of knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is assessed. METHODS: 142 patients are treated with digital rehabilitation therapy after ACL reconstruction. Patients' pain score, joint motion, lower limb function score, anxiety score are statistically analyzed. Patients' satisfaction, device usage and adverse events are documented. RESULTS: At post-operative 1st day, 8th weeks, 12th weeks, pain score are 4, 2, 1, knee joint range of motion are 55°, 110°, 143°, lower limb function score are 18, 56, 76, anxiety score are 32.5, 26, 23.5 respectively. Patients' satisfaction are 9.4. Mean duration of device usage is (177.6±38.0) minutes per week. Rehabilitation-related and device-related adverse event does not happen. CONCLUSIONS: Digital therapy promotes post-operative rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction.

Preoperative serum calcium could be a prognostic factor for surgical treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) could yield good outcomes. While, unsatisfactory recovery still exists in some cases. For all prognostic factors, serum biomarkers have rarely been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative serum calcium level, a widely used serum biomarker, in surgical treatment for RPD. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with RPD were enrolled in the study. Preoperative serum calcium was acquired from routinely tested blood 1 day prior to operation. Demographic data, characteristics of RPD, postoperative functional outcomes were obtained. The association between preoperative calcium and postoperative functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC and KOOS score) was determined by correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis. Poor recovery was determined as Kujala score below 80. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the prognostic value of preoperative calcium. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a mean period of 2.45 ± 1.33 years. All clinical scores showed significant improvement at the latest follow-up. Correlation and multivariate linear analyses indicated that serum calcium level was an important factor related with the prognosis of surgical treatment for RPD. According to the ROC curve, the cut-off value for preoperative calcium was 2.225 mmol/L. The clinical outcomes of patients with a preoperative blood calcium < 2.225 mmol/L was significantly worse than that with a higher calcium level. The correspondent sensitivity was 0.812 with a specificity of 0.633. CONCLUSION: Operative treatment for RPD achieved good results, while in some cases the functional scores remain inferior. As a serum biomarker, preoperative calcium could be prognostic for outcomes after surgical treatment for RPD.

Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With the Iliotibial Band Strip Fixed on the Femoral Cortical Surface Reduces Laxity and Causes Less Overconstraint in the Anterolateral Lesioned Knee: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical effects of femoral cortical surface fixation and intra-tunnel fixation in modified Lemaire tenodesis on the restoration of native kinematics in anterolateral structure-deficient knees. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted in a knee-customized jig to evaluate anterior translation in anterior load and internal rotation degree in internal rotation torque at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, as well as anterolateral translation (ALT) in a simulated pivot-shift test at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°. Kinematic tests were performed in the following states: intact; anterolateral knee lesion (AL-Les); modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with the femoral iliotibial band (ITB) strip fixed on the cortical surface (cortical fixation), deep to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) (deep LET-C); and LET with the femoral ITB strip fixed into a tunnel (intra-tunnel fixation), deep to the LCL (deep LET-IT) or superficial to the LCL (superficial LET-IT). The knee kinematic changes in the AL-Les state and the 3 LET states were compared with each other, with the intact state as the baseline. RESULTS: In the AL-Les state, the increased anterior translation instabilities were significantly mitigated by the 3 LETs at 30°, 60°, and 90° (all P < .001), with overconstraint observed in both the deep LET-IT and superficial LET-IT states at 60° (P = .047 and P < .001, respectively) and 90° (both P < .001). Similarly, the 3 LETs significantly reduced the internal rotation instabilities in the AL-Les state at all flexion angles. The superficial LET-IT state overconstrained the knee at 60° (P = .009) and 90° (P < .001) during internal rotation torque, and the deep LET-IT state did so at 60° (P = .012). Furthermore, the ALT instabilities found in the AL-Les state were significantly reduced by the 3 LETs during the simulated pivot-shift test. At 30° and 45°, these LET states resulted in overconstraint when compared with the intact state, but the superficial LET-IT state (P < .001) or deep LET-IT state (P = .016) presented a larger overconstraint than that in the deep LET-C at 45°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 Lemaire LET procedures evaluated reduced the anterior, internal rotational, and ALT laxities in AL-Les knees and restored these parameters to the native baseline of the intact state at most flexion angles. However, in deep flexion, some overconstraint occurred in all LETs when compared with the intact state, of which the deep LET-C state resulted in less overconstraint in anterior translation and internal rotation than the deep LET-IT and superficial LET-IT states. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This biomechanical study supports using the femoral cortical fixation technique to fix the ITB strip in the modified Lemaire LET, which similarly improves knee kinematic stability and causes less overconstraint compared with conventional intra-tunnel fixation. These findings need more verification in clinical scenarios.

Anterolateral Structure Reconstructions With Different Tibial Attachment Sites Similarly Improve Tibiofemoral Kinematics and Result in Different Graft Force in Treating Knee Anterolateral Instability.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical effects of anterolateral structure reconstructions (ALSRs) with different tibial attachments on tibiofemoral kinematics and anterolateral structure (ALS) graft forces. METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees were tested in a customized knee testing system, using a novel pulley system to simulate more muscle tensions by loading the iliotibial band at 30 N and quadriceps at 10 N in all testing states. Anterior stability during anterior load and anterolateral rotatory stability during 2 simulated pivot-shift tests (PST1 and PST2) were evaluated in 5 states: intact, ALS-deficient (Def), ALSR-Ta (anterior tibial site), ALSR-Tm (middle tibial site), and ALSR-Tp (posterior tibial site). Tibiofemoral kinematics and resulting ALS graft forces against the applied loads were measured and compared in the corresponding states. RESULTS: In anterior load, 3 ALSRs mitigated the anterior laxities of the ALS Def state at all degrees, which were close to intact state at 0° and 30° but showed significantly overconstraints at 60° and 90°. In both PSTs, all ALSRs significantly reduced the anterolateral rotatory instability of ALS Def, whereas the significant overconstraints were detected in ALSR-Ta and ALSR-Tm at greater knee flexion angles. All ALS grafts carried forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads. Only ALS graft force in ALSR-Ta increased continuously with knee flexion angles. The ALS graft forces carried by ALSR-Ta were significantly larger than those by ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm when resisting anterior load and PSTs at greater knee flexion angles. CONCLUSIONS: ALSRs with different tibial attachment sites similarly restored knee laxities close to the native tibiofemoral kinematics in an ALS-deficient knee, whereas the ALSR-Tp showed less propensity for overconstraining the knee at greater flexion angles. The ALS graft in ALSR-Ta carried more forces than those in ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm against simulated loads. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Altering the tibial attachment sites of ALSRs may not significantly affect tibiofemoral kinematics at most degrees whereas the posterior may have less overconstraints at greater flexion angles. However, ALS graft positioning at a more anterior tibial attachment site may carry more forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads.

Double-Tunnel Technique Was Similar to Single-Tunnel Technique in Clinical, Imaging and Functional Outcomes for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes of single-tunnel (ST) and double-tunnel (DT) techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with recurrent patellar instability were randomly divided into 2 groups, receiving either ST or DT MPFL reconstruction. Lateral reticulum release (LRR) and tibial tuberosity (TT) transfer were performed as combined procedures when necessary. Preoperative and postoperative clinical characteristics (symptoms and episodes of redislocation), functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, and KOOS score), and radiological measurements (congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar angle, and lateral patellar translation) were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included data from 90 patients with 48 patients in the ST group and 42 patients in the DT group. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 37.8 (range: 27-50) months in the ST group and 38.6 (range: 25-53) months in the DT group. Forty-three patients in the ST group and 40 patients in the DT group received combined TT transfer, and all patients underwent LRR. At the latest follow-up, 1 patient in ST group experienced redislocation, while no patient in the DT group sustained clinical failure (P = .347). Imaging measurements decreased significantly to the normal range postoperatively. No significant difference was noted between the postoperative radiological results of the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved postoperatively, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups except for the higher Lysholm score (P = .031), KOOS symptoms score (P = .021) and KOOS knee-related quality of life score (P = .043) in the DT group. CONCLUSION: Both techniques could equally mitigate the patellar lateral translation or redislocation. Our results demonstrate several significant differences in functional outcomes that favored DT MPFL reconstruction but no difference in clinical failure rates and radiological results between ST and DT MPFL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized clinical trial.

Augmentation of Anterolateral Structures of the Knee Causes Undesirable Tibiofemoral Cartilage Contact in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Randomized In-Vivo Biomechanics Study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the in vivo tibiofemoral cartilage contact patterns in knees undergoing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(DB-ACLR) with or without anterolateral structure augmentation (ALSA). METHODS: Twenty patients with an ACL-ruptured knee and a healthy contralateral side were included. Nine patients received an isolated DB-ACLR (DB-ACLR group), and 11 patients had a DB-ACLR with ALSA (DB+ALSA group). At 1-year follow-up, a combined computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual fluoroscopy imaging system analysis was used to capture a single-legged lunge of both the operated and healthy contralateral side. Tibiofemoral contact points (CPs) of the medial and lateral compartments were compared. CP locations were expressed as anteroposterior (AP, +/-) and medial-lateral (ML, -/+) values according to the tibia. RESULTS: In the DB-ACLR knees, no significant differences were found in CPs when compared with the healthy contralateral knees (P ≥ .31). However, in the DB+ALSA knees, the CPs in the lateral compartment had a significantly more anterior (mean AP: operative, -2.8 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.0 to-0.7 vs healthy, -5.0 mm, 95% CI -6.7 to -3.2; P = .006) and lateral (mean ML: operative, 23.2 mm, 95% CI 21.9-24.5 vs healthy, 21.8 mm, 95% CI 20.2-23.3; P = .013) location. The CPs in the medial compartment were located significantly more posterior (mean AP: operative, -3.4, 95% CI -5.0 to -1.9 vs healthy, -1.3, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.1; P = .006) and lateral (mean ML: operative, -21.3, 95% CI -22.6 to -20.0 vs healthy, -22.6, 95% CI -24.2 to -21.0; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: DB-ACLR restored the tibiofemoral cartilage contact mechanics to near-normal values at 1-year follow-up. Adding the ALSA to the DB-ACLR resulted in significantly altered tibiofemoral cartilage contact locations in both the medial and lateral compartments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In DB-ACLR knees, the addition of an ALSA may be unfavorable as it caused significantly changed arthrokinematics.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Adductor-Transfer and Adductor-Sling at Nonanatomic Femoral Attachment Sites Leads to Unfavorable Graft-Length Change Patterns: A Descriptive Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the graft length change patterns in nonanatomic adductor-transfer (AT) and adductor-sling (AS) medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with those in anatomic MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) and to investigate the favorable isometric ranges (FIRs) of knee flexion. METHODS: Eight small fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted in a knee-customized jig with tensioned muscles to measure graft length changes from two patellar points to four femoral attachments using a linear variable displacement transducer. Femoral attachments were at the MPFL footprint center (MPFL-C) in anatomic MPFLR, adductor magnus (AM) footprint center (AM-C) in AT, and at 5-mm (AM-5) or 10-mm (AM-10) points proximal to AM-C in AS. The FIRs of these femoral attachments were determined after zeroing the graft length changes at different initial fixation angles. RESULTS: Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in almost isometric graft length changes from 0° to 90°. At AM-C, the graft length changes displayed an increase from 0° to 45° and significantly greater length changes than those at MPFL-C from 60° to 90°. The graft length changes at both AM-5 and at AM-10 continuously increased with knee flexion angles and presented significantly larger graft length changes than those at MPFL-C and at AM-C from 30° to 90° and 60° to 90°, respectively. After zeroing graft length changes at different fixation angles, the FIRs of the MPFL-C covered all knee flexion angles, regardless of the patellar attachments and initial fixation angles. Moreover, with the smaller FIRs of AM-C observed at any fixation angle when compared with MPFL-C, fixing the graft at 0° to 30° in AT allowed the FIRs to cover the whole functional flexion range. However, the significantly larger graft length changes of both AM-5 and AM-10 resulted in extremely limited FIRs at any fixation angle. CONCLUSION: Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in a favorable graft length change range (less than 2 mm) at 0° to 90° of knee flexion, which was close to the isometric graft behavior. However, nonanatomic attachments of AM-C in AT, and both AM-5 and AM-10 in AS caused significant anisometric graft length change patterns and limited FIRs. Moreover, AT had a smaller range of graft length change but wider FIRs compared to AS, indicating superior graft behavior for MPFLR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anatomic MPFLR is preferable for the treatment of in skeletally immature patients, followed in preference by nonanatomic AT. Nonanatomic AS should be performed cautiously.

Anterolateral Structure Reconstruction Similarly Improves the Stability and Causes Less Overconstraint in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees Compared With Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the kinematics of anterolateral structure (ALS) reconstruction (ALSR) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in ACL-ALS-deficient knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with the following conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) ACL-ALS deficiency, (3) ACL reconstruction (ACLR), (4) ACLR combined with ALSR (ACL-ALSR) or LET (ACLR+LET). Anterior translation and tibial internal rotation were measured with 90-N anterior load and 5 N·m internal torque at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The anterolateral translation and internal rotation were also measured during a simulated pivot-shift test at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°. The knee kinematic changes in all reconstructions were compared with each other, with intact knees as the baseline. RESULTS: Isolated ACLR failed to restore native knee kinematics in ACL-ALS-deficient knees. Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures decreased the anterior instability of the ACLR. However, ACLR+LET caused overconstraints in internal rotation at 30° (-3.73° ± 2.60°, P = .023), 60° (-4.96° ± 2.22°, P = .001) and 90° (-6.14° ± 1.60°, P < .001). ACL-ALSR also overconstrained the knee at 60° (-3.65° ± 1.90°, P < .001) and 90° (-3.18° ± 2.53°, P < .001). For a simulated pivot-shift test, both combined procedures significantly reduced the ACLR instability, with anterolateral translation and internal rotation being overconstrained in ACLR+LET at 30° (-3.32 mm ± 3.89 mm, P = .005; -2.58° ± 1.61°, P < .001) and 45° (-3.02 mm ± 3.95 mm, P = .012; -3.44° ± 2.86°, P < .001). However, the ACL-ALSR overconstrained only the anterolateral translation at 30° (-1.51 mm ± 2.39 mm, P = .046) and internal rotation at 45° (-2.09° ± 1.70°, P < .001). There were no significant differences between the two combined procedures at most testing degrees in each testing state, except for the internal rotation at 30° (P = .007) and 90° (P = .032) in internal rotation torque. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction alone did not restore intact knee kinematics in knees with concurrent ACL tears and severe ALS injury (ACL-ALS-deficient status). Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures restored knee stability at some flexion degrees, with less overconstraints in internal rotation resulting from ACL-ALSR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For patients with combined ACL tears and severe ALS deficiency, isolated ACLR probably results in residual rotational and pivot-shift instability. Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET show promise for the improvement of knee stability, whereas ACL-ALSR has less propensity for knee overconstraint.

Allograft contamination during suture preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an ex vivo study.

PURPOSE: Effects of suture preparation on graft contamination remain unknown in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of allograft contamination at different time points of graft preparation and investigate differences in contamination between different sites of the allografts. METHODS: Fourteen hamstring tendon (HT), 9 quadriceps tendon (QT), and 9 bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) allografts were harvested, sterilised, and stored following routine procedures. Graft suture preparation was performed with baseball stitching for soft tissue and bone drilling for bone plug. The time was recorded simultaneously. The graft was kept moist in a standard operating room environment for 30 min after the initiation of preparation. The specimens were obtained from the middle and both ends of each graft for culture at three different time points: pre-suturing, post-suturing, and 30 min after the initiation of preparation. A total of 192 specimens were transferred to the microbiology laboratory for culture, identification, and semi-quantitative assessment. Culture results were classified as negative, poor, and abundant based on the extent of growth. Contamination level was recorded as low or high corresponding to culture results of poor or abundant. RESULTS: The duration of suture preparation was 348, 301, and 246 s for HT, QT, and BTB (P = 0.090). The specimens had a positive culture rate of 41/192 (21.4%), of which 21 were from the ends and 20 from the middle. More positive samples with abundant bacterial growth were detected from the ends than from the middles post-suturing (7/8 vs. 1/7, P = 0.010) and at 30 min (6/11 vs. 0/11, P = 0.012). The total graft contamination rate was significantly higher at 30 min (19/32, 59.4%) than pre-suturing (4/32, 15.6%) and post-suturing (9/32, 28.1%) (P < 0.001). The contamination rate with abundant bacterial growth was higher post-suturing (7/32, 21.9%) than pre-suturing (0%). No statistically significant differences were found among the three types of allografts. CONCLUSION: The contamination rate increases significantly at 30 min compared with pre-suturing and post-suturing. Suture preparation may have introduced the high-level contamination, to which the ends of the graft were more prone than the middle. Therefore, routine prophylactic decontamination after suture preparation should be considered, especially for the ends of the grafts.

Remnant preservation may improve proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the literature investigating proprioception improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and test the hypothesis that ACL tibial remnant-preserving reconstruction (ACLR-R) is more beneficial than standard technique (ACLR-S) in terms of postoperative proprioceptive function with various reported tests, including joint position sense (JPS) and threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM). METHODS: An online search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases before 5 October 2020, on the basis of the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Key terms [('ACLR' or 'ACL-R' or 'anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction') AND ('remnant' or 'stump') AND ('proprioception' or 'proprioceptive')] were used. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and The McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies were used for quality assessment. In total, four articles comparing proprioceptive functions between ACLR-R and ACLR-S were included, two of which were randomized clinical trials rated as level of evidence II, and two were retrospective cohort studies rated as level of evidence III. The outcomes were then compared. Evaluation of proprioception involved joint position sense (JPS) [reproduction of active positioning (RAP) and reproduction of passive positioning (RPP)] and threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) tests. RESULTS: Only four studies were included, with a total of 234 patients (119 ACLR-R patients and 115 ACLR-S patients). High heterogeneity in characteristics and outcome measurements was observed among the studies. Three studies performed sparing technique, and one performed tensioning technique. One study tested RAP and reported better results at an average of 7 months follow-up in ACLR-R (P < 0.05). Three studies tested RPP, one of which measured RPP within 12 months after surgery and reported better results in ACLR-R than in ACLR-S (P < 0.05). The other two studies reported similar results; however, the findings of one study were statistically insignificant. TTDPM was tested in one study, with no statistically significant difference found. CONCLUSION: The current literature, although limited, reported proprioception improvement after ACLR-R (compared with ACLR-S) in terms of JPS. However, owing to the heterogeneity of the relevant studies, further research is required to determine remnant preservation effect on knee proprioceptive restoration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies.

The Effect of Combined Anterolateral and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Reducing Pivot Shift Rate and Clinical Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) result in better knee rotatory stability and postoperative clinical outcomes than ACLR alone. METHODS: A computer literature search was conducted of Medline (1982 to April 2020), Embase (1982 to April 2020), OVID (1982 to April 2020), and the Cochrane Library (1982 to April 2020) to screen all therapeutic trials on combined ACLR and ALLR versus isolated ACLR. Only level of evidence I and II clinical studies were included. The outcome measures included (1) objective knee stability examination such as anterior drawer test, Lachman test, KT-arthrometer measurement, and pivot shift test; (2) patient-reported outcomes such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner activity score, and Lysholm score; (3) return to play; and (4) graft rupture rate. Data were extracted, pooled, and analyzed to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 890 studies were screened, and 884 were excluded. Six clinical trials with 828 subjects were included in the final meta-analysis. In comparison to patients received combined ACLR and ALLR, patients who received isolated ACLR had a significantly lower negative pivot shift test rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.92, I2 = 0%, P = .03, 95% prediction interval [PrI] 1.00 to 2.26), Lysholm score (mean difference -2.79, 95 % CI -4.68 to -0.91, I2 = 77 %, P = .004, 95% PrI -10.81 to 5.42), Tegner score (mean difference -0.57, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.02, I2 = 90 %, P = .04, 95% PrI -3.12 to 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ALLR and ACLR could effectively augment knee rotatory stability by reducing pivot shift rate and moderately improve patients' clinical outcomes. However, the effect of ALLR on overall graft rupture rate cannot be confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

[Clinical features and follow-up results of boys and girls with systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical features and follow-up results of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) between boys and girls. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 79 children (18 boys and 61 girls), aged ≤14 years, who were diagnosed with SLE from 2008 to 2018. The boys and the girls were compared in terms of initial and major clinical symptoms, injury of organs/systems, related laboratory markers, and follow-up results. RESULTS: As for the initial and non-initial symptoms, fever had the highest incidence rate in the boys, while facial erythema had the highest incidence rate in the girls. The boys tended to develop renal injury and hematological damage (P<0.05), with a significantly higher incidence rate of proteinuria than the girls (P<0.05), while the girls tended to develop joint pain (P<0.05). There were high abnormal rates (>80%) of anti-nuclear antibody, dsDNA, complement C3, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in both boys and girls (P>0.05). The boys had a significantly higher disease activity than the girls at the first visit and in year 9 of follow-up (P<0.05). A one-month to ten-year follow-up showed that among the boys, 3 were lost to follow-up, 1 died, 7 were well controlled but required oral administration of large doses of hormones or immunosuppression, 2 progressed to chronic renal failure, and 1 developed lupus encephalopathy. Among the girls, 3 were lost to follow-up; 5 died; 34 were well controlled, among whom 5 were maintained on oral prednisone acetate with a dose of <10 mg, 1 was withdrawn from the drug for 1 year, and 2 were withdrawn from the drug for 2 years; 4 developed lupus encephalopathy; 1 developed depression and anxiety and had suicidal tendency in the 7th year after disease onset; 2 experienced impaired vision, blurred vision, and chloropsia; 1 developed a vascular necrosis of both femoral heads in the 3rd year of hormone administration. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in clinical features, several laboratory markers, and prognosis between boys and girls with SLE. Boys tend to have a high severity at disease onset, develop renal injury and hematological damage, and have poor long-term prognosis, while girls tend to have joint involvement.

Systemic Review of Anatomic Single- Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Does Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique Matter?

PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date assessment of the difference between anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (DB-ACLR) and anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SB-ACLR). We hypothesized that anatomic SB-ACLR using independent femoral drilling technique would be able to achieve kinematic stability as with anatomic DB-ACLR. METHODS: A comprehensive Internet search was performed to identify all therapeutic trials of anatomic DB-ACLR versus anatomic SB-ACLR. Only clinical studies of Level I and II evidence were included. The comparative outcomes were instrument-measured anterior laxity, Lachman test, pivot shift, clinical outcomes including objective/subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale and complication rates of extension/flexion deficits, graft failure, and early osteoarthritis. Subgroup analyses were performed for femoral tunnel drilling techniques including independent drilling and transtibial (TT) drilling. RESULTS: Twenty-two clinical trials of 2,261 anatomically ACL-reconstructed patients were included in the meta-analysis. Via TT drilling technique, anatomic DB-ACLR led to improved instrument-measured anterior laxity with a standard mean difference (SMD) of -0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.81 to -0.02), less rotational instability measured by pivot shift (SMD = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.24 to 6.16), and higher objective IKDC score with odds ratio (OR) of 2.28 (95% CI = 1.19 to 4.36). Via independent drilling technique, anatomic DB-ACLR yielded better pivot shift (SMD = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.36 to 3.05). Anatomic DB-ACLR also revealed statistical significance in subjective IKDC score compared with anatomic SB-ACLR (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic DB-ACLR showed better anterior and rotational stability and higher objective IKDC score than anatomic SB-ACLR via TT drilling technique. Via independent drilling technique, however, anatomic DB-ACLR only showed superiority of rotational stability. All clinical function outcomes except subjective IKDC score were not significantly different between anatomic DB-ACLR and SB-ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.