Delayed arrival of advanced life support adversely affects the neurological outcome in a multi-tier emergency response system.

AIM: Prehospital management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is based on basic life support, with the addition of advanced life support (ALS) if possible. This study aimed to investigate the effect of delayed arrival of ALS on neurological outcomes of patients with OHCA at hospital discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of a registry of patients with OHCA. A multi-tier emergency response system was established in the study area. ALS was initiated when the second-arrival team arrived at the scene. A restricted cubic spline curve was used to investigate the relationship between the response time interval of the second-arrival team and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent association between the response time interval of the second-arrival team and neurological outcomes of patients at hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 3186 adult OHCA patients who received ALS at the scene were included in the final analysis. A restricted cubic spline curve showed that a long response time interval of the second-arrival team was correlated with a high likelihood of poor neurological outcomes. Meanwhile, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that a long response time interval of the second-arrival team was independently associated with poor neurological outcomes (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.17). CONCLUSION: In a multi-tiered prehospital emergency response system, the delayed arrival of ALS was associated with poor neurological outcomes at hospital discharge.

Correction to: Impact of early intravenous amiodarone administration on neurological outcome in refractory ventricular fibrillation: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected prehospital data.

Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors unfortunately became aware of some typesetting and resolution problems in Figs. 1 and 2.

Impact of early intravenous amiodarone administration on neurological outcome in refractory ventricular fibrillation: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected prehospital data.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 AHA guidelines recommend that amiodarone should be used for patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). However, the optimal time interval between the incoming call and amiodarone administration (call-to-amiodarone administration interval) in RVF patients has not been investigated. We hypothesized that the time elapsed until amiodarone administration could affect the neurological outcome at hospital discharge in patients with RVF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled. In univariate logistic regression, the probability of a good neurological outcome at hospital discharge decreased as the time elapsed until amiodarone administration increased (OR 0.89 [95% CI = 0.80-0.99]). In multivariate logistic regression, the patients who were administered amiodarone in less than 20 min showed higher rates of prehospital ROSC, survival at hospital arrival, any ROSC, survival at admission, survival to discharge, and good CPC at hospital discharge. The call-to-amiodarone administration interval of ≤20 min (OR 6.92, 95% CI 1.72-27.80) was the independent factor affecting the neurological outcome at hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Early amiodarone administration (≤ 20 min) showed better neurological outcome at hospital discharge for OHCA patients who showed initial ventricular fibrillation and subsequent RVF.