RESUMO
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a disease characterized by hematopoiesis failure, bone marrow aplasia, and pancytopenia. It can be inherited or acquired. Although acquired AA is believed to be immune-mediated and random, new evidence suggests an underlying genetic predisposition. Besides confirmed genomic mutations that contribute to inherited AA (such as pathogenic mutations of TERT and TERC), germline variants, often in heterozygous states, also play an unignorable role in the onset and progression of acquired AA. These variants, associated with inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) and inborn errors of immunity (IEI), contribute to the disease possibly through mechanisms including gene homeostasis, DNA repair, and immune injury. This article explores the nuanced association between acquired AA and germline variants, detailed the clinical significance of germline variants in diagnosing and clinical management of this condition. More works are encouraged to better understand the role of immunogenic pathogenic variants and whether somatic mutation participate as secondary "hit" in the development of bone marrow failure.
RESUMO
At present, to the best of our knowledge, there are only a few case reports of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) involving myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), yet the incidence of MDS and IgG4-RD is increasing in middle-aged and elderly people. The present study presents a case of MDS combined with IgG4-RD admitted to Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine in September 2022. The (66-year-old; male) patient was admitted to the hospital due to hematopenia with an elevated IgG4 index. The diagnosis of MDS combined with IgG4-RD was confirmed after various exams, including pathological examination. The condition of the patient improved after 3 weeks of hormone therapy, with a significant increase in complete blood count compared with the pre-treatment period. MDS is a malignant hematological disorder with a high risk of conversion to leukemia, and IgG4-RD is a systemic immune-mediated disease with a poor prognosis often associated with malignancy. The present study presents and reviews the literature to better understand the coexistence of these two diseases.
RESUMO
Background: Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) is a common hospital-acquired bacterium. It exhibits high resistance to many antibiotics, including ceftazidime/avibactam and cefteolozane/tazobactam. The presence of carbapenem-resistant genes and co-existence Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) further inactivated all ß-lactams. Understanding the resistance genes of CRPA can help in uncovering the resistance mechanism and guiding anti-infective treatment. Herein, we reported a case of perianal infection with hypervirulent ST463 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Case Presentation: The case is a 32-year-old acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient with fever and septic shock during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and the pathogen was finally identified as a highly virulent sequence type 463 (ST463) P. aeruginosa harboring carbapenem-resistant genes blaAFM-1 and blaKPC-2, which was detected in the bloodstream and originated from a perianal infection. The strain was resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam but successfully treated with polymyxin B, surgical debridement, and granulocyte engraftment after HSCT. The AML was cured during the 19-month follow-up. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the importance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in identifying microbes with rare resistant genes, and managing CRPA, especially in immunocompromised patients. Polymyxin B may be the least resistant option.
RESUMO
KMT2A rearrangement (KMT2A-r) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes; the prognostic factors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain unclear. We investigated 364 adults with AML who underwent allo-HSCT between April 2016 and May 2022, and 45 had KMT2A-r among them. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching and the nearest neighbor matching method identified 42 patients in KMT2A-r and non-KMT2A-r cohorts, respectively. The 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapsed mortality rates of patients with KMT2A-r (n = 45) were 59.1%, 49.6%, 41.5%, and 8.9%, respectively. Using propensity score matching, the 2-year OS rate of patients with KMT2A-r (n = 42) was lower than that of those without KMT2A-r (n = 42; 56.1% vs 88.1%, P = 0.003). Among patients with KMT2A-r (n = 45), the prognostic advantage was exhibited from transplantation in first complete remission (CR1) and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative, which was reflected in OS, RFS, and CIR (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, patients with AF6 had poorer outcomes than those with AF9, ELL, and other KMT2A-r subtypes (P = 0.032, P = 0.001, and P = 0.001 for OS, RFS, and CIR, respectively). However, no differences were found in the OS, RFS, and CIR between patients with KMT2A-r with and without mutations (all P > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that achieving CR1 MRD negative before HSCT was a protective factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.242, P = 0.007], RFS (HR = 0.350, P = 0.036), and CIR (HR = 0.271, P = 0.021), while AF6 was a risk factor for RFS (HR = 2.985, P = 0.028) and CIR (HR = 4.675, P = 0.004). The prognosis of patients with KMT2A-r AML was poor, particularly those harboring AF6-related translocation; however, it is not associated with the presence of mutations. These patients can benefit from achieving CR1 MRD negative before HSCT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Adulto , Humanos , Prognóstico , Análise por Conglomerados , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Análise MultivariadaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sovleplenib, a novel spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor, showed promising safety and activity in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in a phase 1b/2 trial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovleplenib in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ESLIM-01) was done in 34 clinical centres in China. Eligible patients, aged 18-75 years, had chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and received one or more previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral sovleplenib or placebo, 300 mg once daily, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline platelet counts, previous splenectomy, and concomitant treatment for anti-immune thrombocytopenia at baseline. The primary endpoint was durable response rate (proportion of patients with a platelet count of ≥50â×â109/L on at least four of six scheduled visits between weeks 14 and 24, not affected by rescue treatment) assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05029635, and the extension, open-label phase is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2021, and Dec 31, 2022, 188 patients were randomly assigned to receive sovleplenib (n=126) or placebo (n=62). 124 (66%) were female, 64 (34%) were male, and all were of Asian ethnicity. Median previous lines of immune thrombocytopenia therapy were 4·0, and 134 (71%) of 188 patients had received previous thrombopoietin or thrombopoietin receptor agonist. The primary endpoint was met; durable response rate was 48% (61/126) with sovleplenib compared with zero with placebo (difference 48% [95% CI 40-57]; p<0·0001). The median time to response was 8 days with sovleplenib compared with 30 days with placebo. 125 (99%) of 126 patients in the sovleplenib group and 53 (85%) of 62 in the placebo group reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and most events were mild or moderate. Frequent TEAEs of grade 3 or higher for sovleplenib versus placebo were platelet count decreased (7% [9/126] vs 10% [6/62]), neutrophil count decreased (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]), and hypertension (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]). Incidences of serious TEAEs were 21% (26/126) in the sovleplenib group and 18% (11/62) in the placebo group. There were no deaths in the study. INTERPRETATION: Sovleplenib showed a clinically meaningful sustained platelet response in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, with a tolerable safety profile and improvement in quality of life. Sovleplenib could be a potential treatment option for patients with immune thrombocytopenia who received one or more previous therapy. FUNDING: HUTCHMED and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.