Talc Pleurodesis: A Medical, Medicolegal, and Socioeconomic Review.

BACKGROUND: Talcum has been used in pleurodesis for more than 8 decades. Despite a wealth of research, controversy remains over the optimal sclerosant for pneumothorax and pleural effusions. Talc's historical primacy has been challenged because of its potential for pulmonary toxicity, possible carcinogenicity, and recent concerns surrounding availability and legal liability, thus making this an ideal time for a review. METHODS: This systematic review of the talc literature, focused on publications after the year 2000, evaluated mechanism of action, efficacy, side effect profile, and alternative sclerosants; included is an overview of current socioeconomic and legal controversies. RESULTS: The data support talc as the most effective agent for pleurodesis. There is evidence to suggest that mean particle size has a direct relationship with the side effect profile and that significant hypoxemic events after talc administration are exceedingly rare when using available graded talc preparations. Concerns regarding the development of malignant diseases after topical talc application remain incompletely resolved but appear related to cosmetic powder preparations that were contaminated with asbestos. Purified talc in the pleural space has not been implicated. Recent difficulties accessing commercial talc preparations have been solved. Although safe and effective talc alternatives do exist, these agents are not as well studied. CONCLUSIONS: Talc pleurodesis with modern, purified, graded talc preparations is safe and highly effective. Talc is an inexpensive and accessible option that remains appropriate for pleurodesis despite existing controversies.

Transcervical Thymectomy Is the Most Cost-Effective Surgical Approach in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND: Extended thymectomy has been proven to improve the course of myasthenia gravis. Retrospective studies demonstrate that several techniques for thymectomy achieve overlapping remission rates. We therefore compared perioperative outcomes and costs among 3 approaches to thymectomy: sternotomy, video and/or robot assisted, and transcervical. METHODS: To ensure similar study groups, we excluded patients with >4 cm or invasive tumors and those who underwent less than an extended thymectomy or concurrent procedures. Hospital costs were collected and analyzed by blinded finance personnel. RESULTS: The final study group consisted of 25 transcervical, 23 video/robot-assisted, and 14 sternotomy subjects. There was a higher incidence of myasthenia gravis in the transcervical and sternotomy groups (P < 0.001) and of thymoma in the video/robot-assisted and sternotomy groups (P = .002). Mean modified Charlson comorbidity score was higher for sternotomy (2.7 ± 2.1, mean ± SD) than transcervical (1.00 ± 0.58; P < .001) and video/robot-assisted (1.13 ± 0.97; P = .001) procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between approaches (P = 0.828). The cost of transcervical thymectomy was 45% of the cost of sternotomy (P < .001), and was 58% of the cost of video/robot-assisted (P = .018) approaches; these differences remained highly significant on multivariate analysis. Transcervical thymectomy had a shorter mean length of stay (1.2 ± 0.5 days) than median sternotomy (4.4 ± 3.5; P < .001), and video/robot-assisted thymectomy (2.4 ± 0.95; P = .045) and "bed cost" were major contributors to the cost difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transcervical thymectomy, which provides overlapping myasthenia gravis remission rates versus more invasive approaches, is equally safe and far less costly than sternotomy and video/robot-assisted approaches.