Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(2): 147, 2024 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Phosphorous necrosis of the jaw (PNJ) exhibits similar clinical and pathological features as medical-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study aims at comparing the similarities and differences between PNJ and MRONJ regarding pathological features and to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical diagnosis and management of PNJ. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess clinical differences among 38 PNJ patients and 31 MRONJ patients, who were diagnosed and treated between January 2009 and October 2022. Pathological alterations in bone tissue were evaluated using EDS, H&E, Masson, and TRAP staining on five specimens from both MRONJ and PNJ cases; furthermore, immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression levels of OPG, RANKL, and Runx2. The mandibular coronoid process was removed from individuals with temporomandibular joint ankylosis to serve as a control. RESULTS: CBCT imaging demonstrated necrotic bone formation in block, strip, or plaque shapes. EDS analysis showed that the calcium/phosphorus ratio in the bone tissue of PNJ and MRONJ was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, staining indicated reduced osteoblast counts, disrupted bone trabecular structure, and decreased collagen fiber content in the bone tissues of PNJ and MRONJ. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that RANKL expression was significantly lower in MRONJ compared to PNJ and control groups (P < 0.05). Conversely, Runx2 expression was significantly higher in PNJ than in MRONJ and control groups (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in OPG expression. CONCLUSION: PNJ and MRONJ demonstrate comparable clinical manifestations and pathological traits, although disparities may exist in their underlying exhibit comparable clinical manifestations, pathological traits, and molecular mechanisms.


Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Humanos , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/patologia , Subunidade alfa 1 de Fator de Ligação ao Core , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arcada Osseodentária , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico
2.
Int Dent J ; 2024 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677972

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignant tumour in the oral and maxillofacial region. Lactic acid accumulation in the tumour microenvironment (TME) has gained attention for its dual role as an energy source for cancer cells and an activator of signalling pathways crucial to tumour progression. This study aims to reveal the impact of lactate-related genes (LRGs) on the prognosis, TME, and immune characteristics of OSCC, with the ultimate goal of developing a novel prognostic model. METHODS: Unsupervised clustering analysis of LRGs in OSCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database was conducted to evaluate and compare TME, immune features, and clinical characteristics across various lactate subtypes. A refined prognostic model was developed through the application of Cox and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression techniques. External validation sets were then utilised to improve model accuracy, along with a detailed correlation analysis of drug sensitivity. RESULTS: The Cancer Genome Atlas-OSCC patients were categorised into 4 distinct lactate subtypes based on LRGs. Notably, patients in subtype 1 and subtype 2 exhibited the least and most favourable prognoses, respectively. Subtype 1 patients showed elevated expression levels of immune checkpoint genes. Further analysis identified 1086 genes with significant expression differences between cancer and noncancer tissues, as well as between subtype 1 and subtype 2 patients. Selected genes for the prognostic model included ZNF662, CGNL1, VWCE, and ZFP42. The high-risk group defined by this model had a significantly poorer prognosis (P < .0001) and functioned as an independent prognostic factor (P < .001), accurately predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Additionally, individuals in the high-risk category exhibited heightened sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs such as AZ6102 and Venetoclax. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive model based on the genes ZNF662, CGNL1, VWCE, and ZFP42 can serve as a reliable biomarker, providing accurate prognostic predictions for OSCC patients and potential opportunities for pharmaceutical interventions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA