Strengths and challenges in current lung cancer care: Timeliness and diagnostic procedures in six Dutch hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Timely diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) is crucial to achieve optimal patient care and outcome. Moreover, the number of procedures required to obtain a definitive diagnosis can have a large influence on the life expectancy of a patient. Here, adherence with existing Dutch guidelines for timeliness and type and number of invasive and imaging procedures was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1096 patients with suspected LC were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study (NL9146). The overall survival, time from referral to the first appointment with the pulmonologist, time to diagnosis and treatment, and the number of imaging and invasive procedures were evaluated. Patients were divided into different diagnostic groupsearly- and advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC), patients without LC and patients without a definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: The majority of patients (66 %) received a definitive diagnosis within 5 weeks, although the time to diagnosis of early-stage LC patients and patients without LC was significantly longer comparted to advanced stage LC. An increase in invasive procedures was seen for early-stage LC compared to advanced stage LC and for 13 % of the advanced stage non-squamous NSCLC patients up to three additional invasive procedures were performed solely to obtain sufficient material for NGS. For patients without a definitive diagnosis, 50 % did undergo at least one invasive procedure, while 11 % did not wish to undergo any invasive procedures. CONCLUSION: These insights could aid in improved LC diagnostics and efficient implementation of new techniques like liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence. This may lead to more timely LC care, a decreased number of invasive procedures, less variability between the diagnostic trajectory of different patients and aid in obtaining a definitive diagnosis for all patients.

Up-front mutation detection in circulating tumor DNA by droplet digital PCR has added diagnostic value in lung cancer.

Identification of actionable mutations in advanced stage non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is recommended by guidelines as it enables treatment with targeted therapies. In current practice, mutations are identified by next-generation sequencing of tumor DNA (tDNA-NGS), which requires tissue biopsies of sufficient quality. Alternatively, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be used for mutation analysis. This prospective, multicenter study establishes the diagnostic value of ctDNA analysis by droplet digital PCR (ctDNA-ddPCR) in patients with primary lung cancer. CtDNA from 458 primary lung cancer patients was analyzed using a panel of multiplex ddPCRs for EGFR (Ex19Del, G719S, L858R, L861Q and S768I), KRAS G12/G13 and BRAF V600 mutations. For 142 of 175 advanced stage non-squamous NSCLC patients tDNA-NGS results were available to compare to ctDNA-ddPCR. tDNA-NGS identified 98 mutations, of which ctDNA-ddPCR found 53 mutations (54%), including 32 of 45 (71%) targetable driver mutations. In 2 of these 142 patients, a mutation was found by ctDNA-ddPCR only. In 33 advanced stage patients lacking tDNA-NGS results, ctDNA-ddPCR detected 15 additional mutations, of which 7 targetable. Overall, ctDNA-ddPCR detected 70 mutations and tDNA-NGS 98 mutations in 175 advanced NSCLC patients. Using an up-front ctDNA-ddPCR strategy, followed by tDNA-NGS only if ctDNA-ddPCR analysis is negative, increases the number of mutations found from 98 to 115 (17%). At the same time, up-front ctDNA-ddPCR reduces tDNA-NGS analyses by 40%, decreasing the need to perform (additional) biopsies.

Liquid biopsy-based decision support algorithms for diagnosis and subtyping of lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Pathologic subtyping of tissue biopsies is the gold standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer (LC), which could be complicated in cases of e.g. inconclusive tissue biopsies or unreachable tumors. The diagnosis of LC could be supported in a minimally invasive manner using protein tumor markers (TMs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measured in liquid biopsies (LBx). This study evaluates the performance of LBx-based decision-support algorithms for the diagnosis of LC and subtyping into small- and non-small-cell lung cancer (SCLC and NSCLC) aiming to directly impact clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study (NL9146), eight protein TMs (CA125, CA15.3, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, HE4, NSE, proGRP and SCCA) and ctDNA mutations in EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were analyzed in blood of 1096 patients suspected of LC. The performance of individual and combined TMs to identify LC, NSCLC or SCLC was established by evaluating logistic regression models at pre-specified positive predictive values (PPV) of ≥95% or ≥98%. The most informative protein TMs included in the multi-parametric models were selected by recursive feature elimination. RESULTS: Single TMs could identify LC, NSCLC and SCLC patients with 46%, 25% and 40% sensitivity, respectively, at pre-specified PPVs. Multi-parametric models combining TMs and ctDNA significantly improved sensitivities to 65%, 67% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients suspected of LC, the LBx-based decision-support algorithms allowed identification of about two-thirds of all LC and NSCLC patients and half of SCLC patients. These models therefore show clinical value and may support LC diagnostics, especially in patients for whom pathologic subtyping is impossible or incomplete.

Circulating biomarkers for monitoring therapy response and detection of disease progression in lung cancer patients.

Liquid biopsies have become of interest as minimally invasive ways to monitor treatment response in lung cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and protein biomarkers are evaluated for their added value in monitoring therapy response and early detection of disease progression. Plasma and serum samples of non-small cell or small cell lung cancer patients were analyzed for driver mutations in ctDNA (EGFR, KRAS or BRAF) using droplet digital PCR and protein biomarkers (CA125, CEA, CA15.3, Cyfra 21-1, HE4, NSE, proGRP and SCCA) using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Biomarker concentration changes were compared with the outcome of CT-scans during therapy. The median difference of the concentration of ctDNA, CA125 and Cyfra21-1 was significantly lower in patients with partial response (PR) compared to patients with progressive disease (PD) on the first evaluation CT-scan (P<0.001, P=0.042 and P=0.020, respectively). A substantial agreement between ctDNA or CA125 response and radiographic response was observed (k=0.692 and k=0.792, respectively). The median difference of the concentration of ctDNA and Cyfra21-1 was also significantly lower in PR patients compared to PD patients at the last CT-scan during therapy (P<0.001 and P=0.026, respectively). An almost perfect agreement between ctDNA and radiographic response (k=0.827) and a moderate agreement between Cyfra21-1 response and radiographic response was observed (k=0.553). Serial testing of the concentration of ctDNA, Cyfra21-1, and possibly CA125 could be a useful added tool for monitoring therapy response and early detection of disease progression in lung cancer patients.

Correction of the NSE concentration in hemolyzed serum samples improves its diagnostic accuracy in small-cell lung cancer.

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a well-known biomarker for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nevertheless, its clinical applicability is limited since serum NSE levels are influenced by hemolysis, leading to falsely elevated results. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a hemolysis correction equation and evaluate its role in SCLC diagnostics. Two serum pools were spiked with increasing amounts of hemolysate obtained from multiple individuals. A hemolysis correction equation was obtained by analyzing the relationship between the measured NSE concentration and the degree of hemolysis. The equation was validated using intentionally hemolyzed serum samples, which showed that the correction was accurate for samples with an H-index up to 30 µmol/L. Correction of the measured NSE concentration in patients suspected of lung cancer caused an increase in AUC and a significantly lower cut-off value for SCLC detection when compared to uncorrected results. Therefore, a hemolysis correction equation should be used to correct falsely elevated NSE concentrations. Results of samples with an H-index above 30 µmol/L should not be reported to clinicians. Application of the equation illustrates the importance of hemolysis correction in SCLC diagnostics and questions the correctness of the currently used diagnostic cut-off value.