Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (Artekin) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwandan children.

In Rwanda, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (AQ+SP) is the current first-line treatment for malaria, introduced in 2001 as an interim strategy before the future deployment of an artemisinin-based combination treatment (ACT). Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (DHA-PQP) is a new co-formulated and well tolerated ACT increasingly used in Southeast Asia where it has proved to be highly effective against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. We tested the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DHA-PQP in children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. A randomised, open trial was carried out in 2003-2004. Seven hundred and sixty-two children aged 12-59 months with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: amodiaquine+artesunate; AQ+SP; or DHA-PQP. Patients were followed-up until Day 28 after treatment. Adverse events and clinical and parasitological outcomes were recorded. Children treated with DHA-PQP or AQ+AS had a significantly higher cure rate compared with those treated with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (95.2% and 92.0% vs. 84.7%, respectively). Parasite clearance was significantly faster in children treated with DHA-PQP and AQ+AS compared with those treated with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. The frequency of adverse events was significantly lower in patients treated with DHA-PQP than in those treated with combinations containing amodiaquine. A 3-day treatment with DHA-PQP proved to be efficacious with a good safety and tolerability profile and could be a good candidate for the next first-line treatment.

Tolerability of amodiaquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, alone or in combination for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwandan adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability and efficacy of amodiaquine (AQ)+sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the first-line malaria treatment in Rwanda. METHOD: Randomized, double-blind trial in 2003 in Kigali town. A total of 351 adult patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: AQ+SP, AQ or SP. We followed patients until day 14 after treatment and recorded adverse events (AEs) and clinical and parasitological outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients reported at least one AE: 40% in the AQ, 39% in the AQ+SP and 21% in the SP groups. The AE was classified as possibly related to the antimalarial treatment for 86 patients. The Risk Ratio for at least one AE after treatment was significantly and about fourfold higher in patients receiving AQ or AQ+SP than in patients receiving SP. Pruritus and fatigue were significantly more frequent in patients treated with AQ or AQ+SP than in those receiving SP. Severe AEs, such as fatigue, nausea, dizziness and vomiting, were observed in four patients treated with AQ, in 10 treated with AQ+SP and in one patient treated with SP. CONCLUSION: Amodiaquine+SP is not well tolerated and a substantial proportion of patients experienced pruritus and fatigue, thus decreasing their compliance and compromising the first line treatment implementation at national level. This renders AQ-containing regimens sub-optimal; better-tolerated treatments should be identified.