Evaluating the Effectiveness of Systemic Heparin During Arteriovenous Fistula Creation by Emulating a Target Trial.

Most of the 800,000 people living with end-stage kidney disease in the United States rely on a functioning vascular access to provide life-sustaining hemodialysis, yet one-third of arteriovenous fistulas experience early failures. Determining the safety and effectiveness of systemic heparin during fistula creation could improve the quality and quantity of life for these vulnerable patients. In this paper, a pragmatic randomized trial was emulated to assess the effect of systemic heparin administration (vs. none) during radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation on early bleeding and thrombosis using data from two international multicenter randomized trials performed between 2014 and 2019. Marginal risks were estimated using inverse probability weighted parametric survival analysis and confidence intervals were generated with bootstrapping. A total of 914 patients were enrolled and 61% received systemic heparin; median (IQR) age was 58 (49, 67) years and 45% were on hemodialysis at enrollment. No difference in the risk of bleeding events was observed, with a risk difference (95% CI) at 14 days of -0.1% (-1.6, 1.4). The risk of access thrombosis was lower in the heparin group, with a risk of 3.7% (2.6, 4.8) after heparin and 5.3% (3.4, 7.4) without heparin at 14 days (risk ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.50, 0.98).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular vs surgical arteriovenous fistula creation in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: In the United States, an estimated $2.8 billion annually is spent on vascular access and its complications. Endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) creation is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical AV fistula (sAVF) creation in ≤60% of patients. Although cost effective in single-payer systems, the clinical and financial impact of endoAVF in the United States remains uncertain. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree followed by a probabilistic cohort state-transition model to study the cost effectiveness of endoAVF vs sAVF creation. We conducted a systematic review to obtain input parameters including technical success, maturation, patency, and utility values. We derived costs from the Medicare 2022 fee schedule and from the literature. We used a 5-year time horizon, an annual discount rate of 3% for costs and utilities (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and the common willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed varying technical success, patency, reintervention, cost, and utility parameters. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, endoAVF ($30,129 average per-person costs, 2.19 QALYs gained, 65% patent at 5 years) was not cost effective compared with sAVF ($12.987 average per-person costs, 2.11 QALYs gained, 66% patent at 5 years), generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $227,504 per QALY gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, endoAVF becomes cost effective when the initial cost of sAVF creation exceeds endoAVF by ≥$600 (eg, if endoAVF creation costs ≤$3000 relative to the base-case sAVF cost of $3600), the additional QALYs gained from endoAVF exceeds 0.12 QALYs/year (eg, 0.81 QALYs gained/year from endoAVF compared with base-case sAVF 0.69 QALYs/year), the endoAVF maturation rate is >90% (base case 78%), or the sAVF maturation rate is <65% (base case 78%). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that sAVF remained the optimal strategy in 71% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: EndoAVF is not cost effective compared with sAVF when modeling 5-year outcomes. The main driver of sAVF remaining cost effective is the four times higher up-front cost for endoAVF creation, as well as a relatively low additional increase in quality of life for endoAVF. It will be important to establish how the endoAVF learning curve contributes to upfront costs and, given the annual cost attributed to vascular access nationally, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Outcomes of one-stage and two-stage aneurysm repair in arteriovenous fistulae.

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance of long-term arteriovenous access is important in long-term care for patients with end-stage renal disease. Arteriovenous access is associated in the long term with the development of fistula aneurysms (FAs). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of staged FA treatment in dialysis access arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients over a 12-year period with primary autogenous AVF was undertaken at a single center. Patients undergoing elective open aneurysm repair were identified and were categorized into three groups: single FA repair (single, control group) and staged and unstaged repair of two FAs (staged and unstaged). A staged repair was a procedure in which the initial intent was to treat both aneurysms in the AVF and in which the most symptomatic aneurysm was treated first. When the incision from the first surgery had healed, the second symptomatic aneurysm in the AVF was treated. An unstaged repair was a procedure in which the initial intent was to repair both symptomatic aneurysms simultaneously. All patients had a fistulogram before the FA repair. Thirty-day outcomes, cannulation failure, line placement, reintervention, and functional dialysis (continuous hemodialysis for 3 consecutive months) were examined. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-seven patients presented with FA that met requirements for open intervention; 44% underwent single FA repair, whereas the remaining 34% and 22% underwent staged and unstaged repair of two FAs, respectively. The majority of patients were diabetic and Hispanic. Ninety-one percent of the patients required percutaneous interventions of the outflow tract (37%) and the central veins (54%). Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events were equivalent across all modalities. Thirty-day morbidity and early thrombosis (<18 days) were significantly higher in the unstaged group (4.3%) compared with the two other groups (1.3% and 2.1%, single and staged, respectively), which led to an increased need for a short-term tunneled catheter (8.9%) compared with the two other groups (3.4% and 4.4%, single and staged, respectively), Unstaged repair resulted in an increased incidence of secondary procedures (5.0%) compared with the two other groups (2.6% and 3.1%, single and staged, respectively). Functional dialysis at 5 years was equivalent in the single and staged groups but was significantly decreased in the unstaged group. CONCLUSIONS: Open interventions are successful therapeutic modalities for FAs, but unstaged rather than staged repair of two concurrent FAs results in a higher early thrombosis, an increased secondary intervention rate, and a need for a short-term tunneled central line. Staged and single FA repairs have equivalent results. In the setting of two symptomatic FAs, staged repair is recommended.

Temporal trends in hemodialysis access creation during the fistula first era.

OBJECTIVE: Although forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred initial vascular access for hemodialysis based on national guidelines, there are no population-level studies evaluating trends in creation of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). The purpose of this study was to report temporal trends in first-time permanent hemodialysis access type, and to assess the effect of national initiatives on rates of AVF placement. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study (2012-2022) utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database. All patients older than 18 years with creation of first-time upper extremity surgical hemodialysis access were included. Anatomic location of the AVF or AVG (forearm vs upper arm) was defined based on inflow artery, outflow vein, and presumed cannulation zone. Primary analysis examined temporal trends in rates of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and AVGs using time series analyses (modified Mann-Kendall test). Subgroup analyses examined rates of access configuration stratified by age, sex, race, dialysis, and socioeconomic status. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess the effect of the 2015 Fistula First Catheter Last initiative on rates of AVFs. RESULTS: Of the 52,170 accesses, 57.9% were upper arm AVFs, 25.2% were forearm AVFs, 15.4% were upper arm AVGs, and 1.5% were forearm AVGs. From 2012 to 2022, there was no significant change in overall rates of forearm or upper arm AVFs. There was a numerical increase in upper arm AVGs (13.9 to 18.2 per 100; P = .09), whereas forearm AVGs significantly declined (1.8 to 0.7 per 100; P = .02). In subgroup analyses, we observed a decrease in forearm AVFs among men (33.1 to 28.7 per 100; P = .04) and disadvantaged (Area Deprivation Index percentile ≥50) patients (29.0 to 20.7 per 100; P = .04), whereas female (17.2 to 23.1 per 100; P = .03), Black (15.6 to 24.5 per 100; P < .01), elderly (age ≥80 years) (18.7 to 32.5 per 100; P < .01), and disadvantaged (13.6 to 20.5 per 100; P < .01) patients had a significant increase in upper arm AVGs. The Fistula First Catheter Last initiative had no effect on the rate of AVF placement (83.2 to 83.7 per 100; P=.37). CONCLUSIONS: Despite national initiatives to promote autogenous vascular access, the rates of first-time AVFs have remained relatively constant, with forearm AVFs only representing one-quarter of all permanent surgical accesses. Furthermore, elderly, Black, female, and disadvantaged patients saw an increase in upper arm AVGs. Further efforts to elucidate factors associated with forearm AVF placement, as well as potential physician, center, and regional variation is warranted.

Association of race and ethnicity with initial surgical hemodialysis access type in a safety net system.

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have found lower arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation rates in Black and Hispanic patients. Whether this is due to health care disparities or other differences is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the racial/ethnic differences in initial surgical access type within a high-volume, safety net system with predominantly Black and Hispanic populations. METHODS: A retrospective review of initial hemodialysis (HD) access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from all five safety net hospitals in a health care system that primarily treats underserved patients. Patient data collected included race, ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, and initial arteriovenous (AV) access type (AV fistula [AVF] vs AV graft [AVG]). The rates of cephalic vein-based AVF (CAVF; radiocephalic, brachiocephalic) were compared with basilic and brachial vein AVF (BAVF), because the latter are performed as two stages. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were adjusted for demographic and clinical variables to evaluate the relationship between race/ethnicity, surgical access type, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: We included 1334 patients (74% Hispanic, 9% Black, 7% Asian, 2% White, 8% other) who underwent first-time surgical HD access creation. The majority were male (818 [63%]). Medical comorbidities were equal among groups, except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stroke, which were higher in Black patients (P < .005 and P = .005, respectively). Overall, 1303 patients (98%) underwent AVF creation and 31 AVG creation (2%), with no difference between race/ethnicity in AVF vs AVG creation. Of the AVF cohort, 991 (76%) had a CAVF and 312 (24%) had a BAVF. Males were more likely than females to get a CAVF (65% vs 35%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Within our safety net health system, where most patients are under-represented minorities, nearly all patients undergoing HD access had an AVF as their initial surgery with no difference in race/ethnicity. AVF type received differed by race, with Black patients twice as likely to undergo BAVF, which required two stages. Further studies are needed to identify the reasons for these differences.

Vein distensibility is superior to vein diameter for predicting unassisted maturation of arteriovenous fistulae.

BACKGROUND: A mature arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred hemodialysis access owing to its durability and lower risk of complications. Various factors have been implicated as predictors for maturation, including vein diameter and access type. Vein distensibility, which refers to the ability of the vein to dilate in response to changes in blood flow and pressure, has been proposed as a potential predictor for maturation, but its utility remains poorly studied. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of AVFs performed under regional anesthesia. Vein distensibility was defined as the absolute and relative difference in target vein diameter (TVD) between the preoperative ultrasound vein mapping performed with tourniquet and a repeat ultrasound examination after a regional block before AVF creation and without a tourniquet. RESULTS: There were 46 patients who underwent first-time AVF surgery and had distensibility captured in a prospectively maintained database. The mean initial preoperative TVD was 2.7 mm and after the block 3.4 mm. The unassisted maturation rate for the entire cohort was 76%. In patients with an absolute change of TVD of <0.5 mm (Δ<0.5), the unassisted maturation rate was 63% (12/19), even though 95% of the group had a preoperative TVD of >3 mm. In those with ≥0.5 mm, the unassisted maturation rate was 85% (23/27; P = .08), even though the preoperative vein map TVD was 2.3 mm and 75% had a vein map TVD of <3 mm. For radiocephalic AVFs (n = 26), the unassisted maturation rate was 75% for Δ<0.5 vs 94% for Δ≥0.5 (P = .16), despite a preoperative vein map TVD of >3 mm in 92% vs 75%, respectively. The receiver operatring characteristic area under the curve for unassisted maturation with a Δ≥0.5 mm was 0.68 (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: Quality in dialysis access surgery requires optimizing the unassisted maturation rate. A physiological measure that accounts for the dynamic process of maturation may be more informative than anatomic measurements alone. The results shown here demonstrate that vein distensibility may be a better predictor than absolute vein diameter on standard vein mapping ultrasound examinations.

Short-term mortality and revisions to promote maturation after arteriovenous fistula creation.

OBJECTIVE: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis access is traditionally considered superior to grafts due to infection resistance and purported improved patency. However, challenges to AVF maturation and limited patient survival may reduce AVF benefits. The objective of this study is to identify factors associated with risk of AVF requiring revision before maturation and/or mortality within 2 years of creation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 250 AVFs created between May 2017 and November 2020 at a single institution. Maturation was defined as the date the surgeon deemed the AVF ready for use or the patient successfully used the AVF for dialysis. The Risk Analysis Index was used to calculate frailty. The primary outcome was a composite of endovascular/surgical revision to promote maturation and/or mortality within 2 years of AVF creation (REVDEAD). The primary outcome was categorized as met if the patient required a revision to promote maturation or if the patient experienced mortality within 2 years of AVF creation, or if both occurred. REVDEAD was compared with those who did not meet the primary outcome and will be referred to as NOREVDEAD. RESULTS: Survival at 2 years after AVF creation was 82%, and 54 (22%) patients underwent AVF revision. Of those, 31 (59%) patients progressed to AVF maturation. Of the 250 AVFs, 91 (36%) met the primary outcome of REVDEAD and 159 (64%) did not (NOREVDEAD). There was no difference between the REVDEAD and NOREVDEAD groups in age (P = .18), sex (P = .75), White race (P = .97), Hispanic ethnicity (P = .62), obesity (P = .76), coronary artery disease (P = .07), congestive heart failure (P = .29), diabetes mellitus (P = .78), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .10), dialysis status (P = .63), hypertension (P = .32), peripheral arterial disease (P = .34), or dysrhythmia (P = .13). There was no difference between the groups in the forearm vs the upper arm location of AVF (P = .42) or the vein diameter (P = .58). Forearm access, as opposed to upper arm AVF creation, was associated with higher rate of revision before maturation (P = .05). More patients in REVDEAD were frail or very frail (60% vs 48%, P = .05). Of the AVFs that matured, maturation required longer time in REVDEAD at 110.0 ± 9.1 days vs 78.8 ± 5.6 days (mean ± standard deviation) (P = .003). Adjusted for the vein diameter and the forearm vs the upper arm, frailty increased the odds of REVDEAD by 1.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.1, 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients who underwent AVF were significantly more likely to die within 2 years of AVF creation with no significant association between frailty and the need for revisions to promote maturation. Forearm AVFs were more likely to require revisions; in patients who are frail, with a high likelihood of 2-year mortality, graft may be more appropriate than AVF. If AVF is being considered in a frail patient, upper arm AVFs should be prioritized over forearm AVFs.

Creating hemodialysis autogenous access in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in childhood and adolescence is rare, with relatively few published reports of pediatric ESRD vascular access. This study analyzes a 10-year experience creating arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in children and adolescents. Our goal is to review our strategy for creating functional autogenous vascular access in younger patients and report our results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data and outcomes for consecutive vascular access patients aged ≤19 years during a 10-year period. Each patient had preoperative vascular ultrasound mapping by the operating surgeon in addition to physical examination. A distal forearm radiocephalic AVF was the first access choice when feasible, and a proximal radial artery inflow AVF was the next option. Demographic data, inflow artery, venous outflow target, and required transposition vs direct AVFs were variables included in the analysis. Primary and cumulative patency were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven AVFs were created in 35 patients. No grafts were used. Ages were 6 to 19 years (mean, 15 years), and 20 were male. Causes of ESRD included glomerular disease (n = 18) and urinary obstruction or reflux (n = 7), among others. Three had previous AVFs, and 10 were obese. The proximal radial artery supplied AVF inflow in 25 patients and the brachial artery in only seven. Eleven individuals required a transposition and one a vein translocation to the contralateral arm. No patients developed hand ischemia, although two later required banding procedures for high flow. Eleven patients had successful transplants. A single patient died, unrelated to the vascular access. Five AVFs failed. Of these, two had new successful AVFs created, two regained renal function, one was transplanted, and one declined other procedures. Primary and cumulative patency rates were 75% and 85% at 12 months, 70% and 85% at 24 months, and 51% and 85% at 36 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Creating an AVF for hemodialysis is a successful vascular access strategy for pediatric and adolescent patients. Proximal radial artery AVFs provided safe and functional access when a distal AVF was not feasible. Cumulative AVF patency was 85% at 36 months.

Midterm outcomes of arteriovenous fistula aneurysm repair with simultaneous inflow revision or outflow tract revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcomes of extensive revisions aimed at simultaneously addressing arteriovenous fistula (AVF) aneurysms, outflow stenosis, and/or high flow volumes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center. The study population comprised hemodialysis patients with aneurysmal AVFs requiring revision. Subjects were eligible if they were ≥18 years of age and had aneurysm repair associated with inflow revision or treatment of outflow lesions. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years, and the primary outcome measure was cumulative patency. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 93 patients with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The most frequent access type was brachiocephalic fistula (61%), and the median access age at the time of revision was 66 months (interquartile range, 46-93 months). The median access flow volume was 2300 ml/min (interquartile range, 1281-2900), and 31 subjects (33%) presented aneurysms associated with both high flow and venous obstruction. Aneurysm repair consisted of aneurysmorraphy in the overwhelming majority (95%). Inflow revision was performed in a total of 49 cases (53%), and outflow tract obstruction was treated in 71 patients (72%), with 27 patients (29%) receiving a simultaneous 3-component revision. At 2 years, the primary, primary assisted, and cumulative patencies were 60% ± 1%, 91% ± 3%, and 94% ± 3%, respectively. The most frequent indication for first-time reinterventions was outflow tract stenosis (24%). Aneurysm recurrence was observed in 13 subjects (14%) during the entire follow-up and was responsible for reinterventions in seven of them (8%), with a 2-year freedom from aneurysm-related reintervention rate of 95% ± 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive AVF revision with simultaneous aneurysm repair, inflow revision, and outflow tract revascularization is feasible, safe, and associated with favorable 2-year patency rates.

Intraoperative transit time flow measurement predicts maturation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the first choice for gaining vascular access for hemodialysis. However, 20% to 50% of AVFs fail within 4 months after creation. Although demographic risk factors have been described, there is little evidence on the intraoperative predictors of AVF maturation failure. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of intraoperative transit time flow measurements (TTFMs) on AVF maturation failure. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, intraoperative blood flow, measured using TTFM, was compared with AVF maturation after 6 weeks in 55 patients. Owing to its significantly higher prevalence and risk of nonmaturation, the radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) was the main focus of this study. A recommended cutoff point for high vs low intraoperative blood flow was determined for RCAVFs, using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The average intraoperative blood flow in RCAVFs was 156 mL/min. Patients with an intraoperative blood flow equal or lower than the determined cutoff point of 160 mL/min, showed a 3.03 times increased risk of AVF maturation failure after 6 weeks, compared with patients with a higher intraoperative blood flow (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative blood flow in RCAVFs measured by TTFM provides an adequate means of predicting AVF nonmaturation 6 weeks after surgery. For RCAVFs, a cutoff point for intraoperative blood flow of 160 mL/min is recommended for maximum sensitivity and specificity to predict AVF maturation failure after 6 weeks.