RESUMO
Introduction: The therapeutic strategy and management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have rapidly improved with the discovery of effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to target BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. However, nearly 30% of patients develop TKI resistance due to acquired mutations on the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of BCR::ABL1. Methods: We customized a mass array panel initially intended to detect and monitor the mutational burden of hotspot BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations accumulated in our database, including key mutations recently recommended by European LeukemiaNet. Additionally, we extended the feasibility of using the assay panel for the molecular classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) by incorporating primer sets specific for analyzing JAK2 V617F, MPL 515 K/L, and CALR types 1 and 2. Results: We found that the developed mass array panel was superior for detecting and monitoring clinically significant BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations, especially in cases with low mutational burden and harboring compound/polyclonal mutations, compared with direct sequencing. Moreover, our customized mass array panel detected common genetic alterations in MPNs, and the findings were consistent with those of other comparable assays available in our laboratory. Conclusions: Our customized mass array panel was practicably used as a routine robust assay for screening and monitoring BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations in patients with CML undergoing TKI treatment and feasible for analyzing common genetic mutations in MPNs.
RESUMO
Ultra-deep sequencing detects low-frequency genetic mutations with high sensitivity. We used this approach to prospectively examine mutations in the BCR/ABL1 tyrosine kinase from patients with newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib. Between May 2013 and November 2014, 50 patients from 18 institutions were enrolled in the study. We screened 103 somatic mutations and found that mutations in the P-loop domain were the most frequent (173/454 mutations in the P-loop) and noted the presence of the V299 L mutation (dasatinib-resistant/nilotinib-sensitive) in 98 % of patients (49/50). No patients had Y253H, E255 V, or F359 V/C/I mutations, which would recommend dasatinib rather than nilotinib treatment. The S417Y mutation was associated with lower achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) at 6 months, and the V371A mutation was associated with reduced MMR and MR4.5 durations (MMR for 2 years: 100 % for no mutation vs. 75 % for mutation, P=0.039; MR4.5 for 15 months: 94.1 % vs. 25 %, P=0.002). Patients with known nilotinib-resistant mutations had lower rates of MR4.5 achievement. In conclusion, ultra-deep sequencing is a sensitive method for genetic-based treatment decisions. Based on the results of these mutational analyses, nilotinib treatment is a promising option for Korean patients with CML.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/patologia , Mutação , Dasatinibe/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Emergence of clones carrying point mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) is a common mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Sanger sequencing (SS) is the most frequently used method for diagnostic BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening, but it has some limitations-it is poorly sensitive and cannot robustly identify compound mutations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may overcome these problems. NSG is increasingly available and has the potential to become the method of choice for diagnostic BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening. A group discussion within an ad hoc constituted Panel of Experts has produced a series of consensus-based statements on the potential value of NGS testing before and during first-line TKI-based treatment, in relapsed/refractory cases, before and after allo-stem cell transplantation, and on how NGS results may impact on therapeutic decisions. A set of minimal technical and methodological requirements for the analysis and the reporting of results has also been defined. The proposals herein reported may be used to guide the practical use of NGS for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation testing in Ph+ ALL.
Assuntos
Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Mutação , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patologia , Humanos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The therapeutic landscape of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) has truly been revolutionized with the advent of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. First-line therapy with the TKI imatinib has produced high rates of remissions among treatment-naive patients, as well as patients previously treated with interferon. However, imatinib resistance and intolerance remain significant clinical challenges. Dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib are more recently developed TKIs that have been shown to be very effective as second- or later-line treatment for CML after imatinib failure. Dasatinib and nilotinib are also approved for use in newly diagnosed patients with CP-CML, and produce faster responses when compared with first-line imatinib. Resistance or intolerance can occur with any of the currently available TKIs, necessitating a change to an alternative TKI or consideration of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Treatment options and outcomes for patients whose first-line therapy has failed are reviewed in depth in this article.