Statistical learning of blunt cerebrovascular injury risk factors using the elastic net.

PURPOSE: To compare logistic regression to elastic net for identifying and ranking clinical risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive trauma patients undergoing screening CTA at a level 1 trauma center over a 2-year period. Each internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) was independently graded by 2 neuroradiologists using the Denver grading scale. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated by univariate and adjusted odds ratios by multiple logistic regression with FDR correction. We applied logistic regression with the elastic net penalty and tenfold cross-validation. RESULTS: Total of 467 patients; 73 patients with BCVI. Maxillofacial fracture, basilar skull fracture, and GCS had significant unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for ICA injury and C-spine fracture, spinal ligamentous injury, and age for VA injury. Only transverse foramen fracture had significant adjusted OR for VA injury, with none for ICA injury, after FDR correction. Using elastic net, ICA injury variables included maxillofacial fracture, basilar skull fracture, GCS, and carotid canal fracture. For VA injury, these included cervical spine transverse foramen fracture, ligamentous injury, C1-C3 fractures, posterior element fracture, and vertebral body fracture. CONCLUSION: Elastic net statistical learning methods identified additional risk factors and outperformed multiple logistic regression for BCVI. Elastic net allows the study of a large number of variables, and is useful when covariates are correlated.

Characterizing Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries and Stroke: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the occurrence of ischemic stroke after blunt cerebrovascular injuries and discuss the neurologist's role in preventing and managing ischemic strokes in this trauma population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed and included data from 2016 to 2019 from a Level I trauma center. Demographics, injury mechanism, ischemic stroke occurrence, interventions, and neurology consultations were examined and descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize the nature of ischemic strokes and their management. RESULTS: A total of forty patients (81% male, average age 44) presented with blunt cerebrovascular injury, nine of whom later developed ischemic stroke. Eighteen patients had a carotid artery injury with six developing ischemic stroke. Twenty-seven patients had a vertebral artery injury with three developing ischemic stroke. Six of the nine ischemic strokes occurred on hospital day two, whereas neurology was generally consulted on hospital day four. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable portion of patients may go on to develop ischemic stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Polytrauma may interfere with prompt diagnosis which may contribute to delayed anti-thrombotic therapy for ischemic stroke prevention. Neurologists have the opportunity to reduce ischemic stroke burden in this trauma population and patients may benefit from earlier neurology consultation.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury in the geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is associated with high rates of neurological morbidity and mortality. The detection and management of BCVI has improved with advances in imaging and sensitive screening protocols. Few studies have explored how these injuries specifically affect the geriatric population. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the presentation and prognosis of BCVI in the elderly population and to assess its clinical implications in the management of these patients. METHODS: All patients presenting to the University of Cincinnati (UC) level I trauma center between February 2017 and December 2019 were screened for BCVI and entered into the prospectively maintained UC Neurotrauma Registry. Patients with BCVI confirmed by CT angiography underwent retrospective chart reviews to collect information regarding demographics, positive screening criteria, cause of injury, antithrombotic agent, injury location, Denver Grading Scale, hospital and ICU length of stay, and discharge disposition. Patients were divided into geriatric (age ≥ 65 years) and adult (age < 65 years) subgroups. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Student t-test and categorical variables with the Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: Of 124 patients with BCVI, stratification by age yielded 23 geriatric and 101 adult patients. Injury in the geriatric group was associated with significantly higher mortality (p = 0.0194). The most common cause of injury in the elderly was falls (74%, 17/23; p < 0.0001), whereas motor vehicle accidents were most common in the adult group (38%, 38/100; p = 0.0642). With respect to the location of injury, carotid (p = 0.1171) and vertebral artery (p = 0.6981) injuries did not differ significantly for the geriatric group. The adult population presented more often with Denver grade I injuries (p < 0.0001), whereas the geriatric population presented with grade IV injuries (p = 0.0247). Elderly patients were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities (p = 0.0403) and adults to home or self-care (p = 0.0148). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to characterize BCVI to all cervical and intracranial vessels in the geriatric population. Older age at presentation is significantly associated with greater severity, morbidity, and mortality from injury, with no preference for the particular artery injured. These findings carry important clinical implications for adapting practice in an aging population.

A comparison of digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of penetrating cerebrovascular injury.

OBJECTIVE: Penetrating cerebrovascular injury (PCVI) is a subset of traumatic brain injury (TBI) comprising a broad spectrum of cerebrovascular pathology, including traumatic pseudoaneurysms, direct arterial injury, venous sinus stenosis or occlusion, and traumatic dural arteriovenous fistulas. These can result in immediate or delayed vascular injury and consequent neurological morbidity. Current TBI guidelines recommend cerebrovascular imaging for detection, but there is no consensus on the optimum modality. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare CT angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the diagnosis of PCVI. METHODS: The records of all patients presenting to two level I trauma centers in the United States between January 2010 and July 2016 with penetrating head or neck trauma were reviewed. Only those who had undergone both CTA and DSA were included. Clinical and neuroimaging data were collected, and PCVIs were stratified using a modified Biffl grading scheme. DSA and CTA results were then compared. RESULTS: Of 312 patients with penetrating trauma over the study period, 56 patients (91% male, mean age 32 years) with PCVI met inclusion criteria and constituted the study cohort. The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 86% (48/56) of patients. Twenty-four (43%) patients had sustained an angiographically confirmed arterial or venous injury. Compared with DSA as the gold standard, CTA had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 63%, respectively, for identifying PCVI. CTA had a positive predictive value of 61% and negative predictive value of 70%. Seven patients (13%) required immediate endovascular treatment of PCVI; in 3 (43%) of these patients, the injury was not identified on CTA. Twenty-two patients (39%) underwent delayed DSA an average of 25 days after injury; 2 (9%) of these patients were found to harbor new pathological conditions requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of PCVI at two large trauma centers, CTA demonstrated low sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of PCVI. These findings suggest that DSA provides better accuracy than CTA in the diagnosis of both immediate and delayed PCVI and should be considered for patients experiencing penetrating head or neck trauma.

Case Series of Adolescents With Stroke-Like Symptoms Following Head Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Studies cite the incidence of pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) ranges from 0.03% to 1.3%. While motor vehicle incidents are a known high-risk mechanism, we are the first to report on football injuries resulting in BCVI. CASE REPORT: Case 1 is a 14-year-old male football player who presented with slurred speech and facial droop 16 h after injury that had resulted in unilateral stinger on the field. The patient had a negative brain computed tomography (CT) at the onset of symptoms. Given progression of symptoms over the next 24 h, re-evaluation with CT angiography (CTA) of brain and neck showed left internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed left middle cerebral artery infarct. Case 2 is a 16-year-old male football player who presented with headache and right hemiparesis immediately following a tackle injury. CT brain and neck were negative at an outside hospital, but he was transferred to us for progressive symptoms, and then CTA showed a left ICA dissection with distal emboli, including occlusive involvement of the intracranial left ICA. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The diagnosis of BCVI requires a high level of suspicion. Focal neurologic deficits are consistently a risk factor across all screening criteria, including the Denver, Utah, Memphis, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. These current screening criteria, however, may not be sufficient to diagnosis BCVI in children. The addition of the mechanism of injury and attention to the patient's clinical presentation and examination are important to prevent missed diagnosis and poor neurologic outcomes.

Augmenting Denver criteria yields increased BCVI detection, with screening showing markedly increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke.

PURPOSE: BCVI may lead to ischemic stroke, disability, and death, while being often initially clinically silent. Screening criteria for BCVI based on clinical findings and trauma mechanism have improved detection, with Denver criteria being most common. Up to 30% of patients do not meet BCVI screening criteria. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of augmented Denver criteria on detection, and to determine the relative risk for ischemic stroke. METHODS: Denver screening criteria were augmented by any high-energy trauma of the cervical spine, thorax, abdomen, or pelvis. All acute blunt trauma WBCT including CT angiography (CTA) over a period of 38 months were reviewed retrospectively by two Fellowship-trained radiologists, as well as any cerebral imaging after the initial trauma. RESULTS: 1544 WBCT studies included 374 CTA (m/f = 271/103; mean age 41.5 years). Most common mechanisms of injury were MVA (51.5%) and fall from a height (22.3%). We found 72 BCVI in 56 patients (15.0%), with 13 (23.2%) multiple lesions. The ICA was affected in 49 (68.1%) and the vertebral artery in 23 (31.9%) of cases. The most common injury level was C2, with Biffl grades I and II most common in ICA, and II and IV in VA. Interobserver agreement was substantial (Kappa = 0.674). Of 215 patients imaged, 16.1% with BCVI and 1.9% of the remaining cases had cerebral ischemic stroke (p < .0001; OR = 9.77; 95% CI 3.3-28.7). Eleven percent of patients with BCVI would not have met standard screening criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in detection rate for BCVI justifies more liberal screening protocols.

Post-traumatic Anterior Cerebral Artery Rupture after a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) have been increasingly recognized in the past decade due to the initiation of different screening protocols. We present the case of an anterior cerebral artery rupture with free contrast extravasation following a severe traumatic brain injury. Epidemiology, modalities of screening and treatment of BCVI are discussed. This report reminds that the screening of BCVI may be essential after a severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mathais Q, Esnault P, Joubert C, Dragone C, Meaudre E. Post-traumatic Anterior Cerebral Artery Rupture after a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, January 2019;23(1):54-55.

[Blunt cerebrovascular injury]. / Le cas clinique du mois. Accident vasculaire ischémique, secondaire à un polytraumatisme chez un enfant.

A blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) can cause severe cerebral ischemic sequelae. The diagnosis is tricky and often entails a latency period. Adequate treatment at this time will dramatically reduce mortality and morbidity. The Denver protocol guides the selection of the patients to be screened. Current treatment is based on heparin, anticoagulant antiplatelet drugs, interventional radiology and surgery. The treatment is based on a dynamic strategy.

Les lésions artérielles des vaisseaux du cou et de l'encéphale par traumatisme fermé peuvent provoquer de graves séquelles ischémiques cérébrales. Leur diagnostic est délicat et requiert très souvent une période de latence. Une thérapeutique adéquate à ce moment peut considérablement réduire la mortalité et la morbidité. Le protocole de Denver vise à déterminer quel patient doit être dépisté. Le traitement actuel fait appel à l'héparine, aux antiagrégants, à la radiologie interventionnelle et à la chirurgie. La stratégie thérapeutique est dynamique.

Prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) includes carotid and/or vertebral artery injury following trauma, and conveys an increased stroke risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive summary of prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following BCVI. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 1946 to June 2023. We identified studies reporting associations between patient or injury factors and risk of stroke following BCVI. We performed meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) using the random effects method and assessed individual study risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. We separately pooled adjusted and unadjusted analyses, highlighting the estimate with the higher certainty. RESULTS: We included 26 cohort studies, involving 20,458 patients with blunt trauma. The overall incidence of stroke following BCVI was 7.7 %. Studies were predominantly retrospective cohorts from North America and included both carotid and vertebral artery injuries. Diagnosis of BCVI was most commonly confirmed with CT angiography. We demonstrated with moderate to high certainty that factors associated with increased risk of stroke included carotid artery injury (as compared to vertebral artery injury, unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 1.94, 95 % CI 1.62 to 2.32), Grade III Injury (as compared to grade I or II) (uOR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.88 to 3.20), Grade IV injury (uOR 3.09, 95 % CI 2.20 to 4.35), polyarterial injury (uOR 3.11 (95 % CI 2.05 to 4.72), occurrence of hypotension at the time of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.32, 95 % CI 0.87 to 2.03) and higher total body injury severity (aOR 5.91, 95 % CI 1.90 to 18.39). CONCLUSION: Local anatomical injury pattern, overall burden of injury and flow dynamics contribute to BCVI-related stroke risk. These findings provide the foundational evidence base for risk stratification to support clinical decision making and further research.

Analyzing computed tomography Modalities for screening pediatric patients for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury.

BACKGROUND: Optimal screening for BCVI in pediatric trauma patients remains debated. We hypothesized screening with CTAN would decrease the number of duplicate CT scans per patient and increase BCVI detection rate. METHODS: Local BCVI screening institutional protocol changed May 2022 to include Computed Tomography angiography neck (CTAN). We performed a retrospective review of pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023. Patients before and after implementation of universal screening were compared for demographic, clinical, radiographic, and outcome data. RESULTS: Six-hundred-eight patients were included with 368 before and 240 after the protocol change. Screening with CTAN decreased the number of duplicate neck scans (5.7%vs.2.1 â€‹%,p â€‹= â€‹0.03) and increased BCVI detection rate (0.27%v.2.5 â€‹%,p â€‹= â€‹0.01). Of the seven patients diagnosed with BCVI 2019-2023, no patients suffered any stroke-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: Universal screening for BCVI in pediatric patients with CTAN resulted in fewer scans and an increased BCVI detection rate.

Early Pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury and TBI: Is it Safe and Effective? An EAST Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) with concurrent traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents increased risk of both ischemic stroke and bleeding. This study investigated the safety and survival benefit of BCVI treatment (antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy) in this population. We hypothesized that treatment would be associated with fewer and later strokes in patients with BCVI and TBI without increasing bleeding complications. METHODS: Patients with head AIS >0 were selected from a database of BCVI patients previously obtained for an observational trial. A Kaplan-Meier analysis compared stroke survival in patients who received BCVI treatment to those who did not. Logistic regression was used to evaluate for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 488 patients, 347 (71.1%) received BCVI treatment and 141 (28.9%) did not. BCVI treatment was given at a median of 31 h post-admission. BCVI treatment was associated with lower stroke rate (4.9% vs 24.1%, P < .001 and longer stroke-free survival (P < .001), but also less severe systemic injury. Logistic regression identified motor GCS and BCVI treatment as the only predictors of stroke. No patients experienced worsening TBI because of treatment. DISCUSSION: Patients with BCVI and TBI who did not receive BCVI treatment had an increased rate of stroke early in their hospital stay, though this effect may be confounded by worse motor deficits and systemic injuries. BCVI treatment within 2-3 days of admission may be safe for patients with mean head AIS of 2.6. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal timing of BCVI treatment in TBI patients with BCVI.

Antiplatelets versus anticoagulants in the treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in 1-3% of blunt traumas and is associated with stroke, disability, and mortality if unrecognized and untreated. Early detection and treatment are imperative to reduce the risk of stroke, however, there is significant variation amongst centers and trauma care providers in the specific medical management strategy used. This study compares antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants to determine BCVI-related stroke risk and bleeding complications to better understand the efficacy and safety of various treatment strategies. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian. The search was supplemented with manual review of the literature. Included studies reported treatment-stratified risk of stroke following BCVI. All studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and data was extracted in duplicate. Meta-analysis was conducted using pooled estimates of odds ratios (OR) with a random-effects model using Mantel-Haenszel methods. RESULTS: A total of 3315 studies screened yielded 39 studies for inclusion, evaluating 6552 patients (range 8 - 920 per study) with a total of 7643 BCVI. Stroke rates ranged from 0% to 32.8%. Amongst studies included in the meta-analysis, there were a total of 405 strokes, with 144 (35.5%) occurring on therapy, for a total stroke rate of 4.5 %. Meta-analysis showed that stroke rate after BCVI was lower for patients treated with antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33-0.96, p = 0.04); when evaluating only the 9 studies specifically comparing ASA to heparin, the stroke rate was similar between groups (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.15-1.20, p = 0.11). Eleven studies evaluated bleeding complications and demonstrated lower risk of bleeding with antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.63, p = 0.002); 5 studies evaluating risk of bleeding complications with ASA vs. heparin showed lower rates of bleeding complications with ASA (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.58, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with BCVI with antiplatelets is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding complications compared to treatment with anticoagulants. Use of ASA vs. heparin specifically was not associated with differences in stroke risk, however, patients treated with ASA had fewer bleeding complications. Based on this evidence, antiplatelets should be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with BCVI.

Important underground roosts for bats in Bulgaria: current state and priorities for conservation.

Bulgaria has a very rich bat fauna and large colonies of bats can be found in caves, mines and other underground roosts. Respectively, there are more than 107 underground roosts that are listed as important bat sites, most of which are protected by statutory laws and are of national or international importance. Despite the existence of formal protection, many roosts face anthropogenic disturbances due to the popularity of outdoor activities, such as caving and the lack of actual regulation. Currently, the evaluation was only based on the size of the colony and the presence of protected species. However, this approach is limited to roosts that contain high diversity and neglects the ones that contain high biotic importance that are highly threatened by various threats. Here, we evaluated conservation priorities and identified the most vulnerable underground bat roosts in Bulgaria, using the Bat Cave Vulnerability Index and proposed measures to adequately protect sites. We found that 32% of the Bulgarian bat roosts assessed are at a "high priority" level for conservation and protection, while 39% are at a "medium priority" that may require constant monitoring. This novel and integrative approach applied to bat roost prioritisation in the country enabled the detection of sites that need urgent conservation attention and is the first step in establishing better strategies for the bat monitoring network in Bulgaria.

Protect That Neck! Management of Blunt and Penetrating Neck Trauma.

Blunt and penetrating vascular injuries to the neck represent a significant burden of mortality and disability among trauma patients. Blunt cerebrovascular injury can present with signs of stroke either immediately or in a delayed fashion. Most injuries are detected with computed tomography angiogram and managed by antiplatelet agents or unfractionated heparin. In contrast, for patients presenting with penetrating neck injuries, assessment for hard signs of vascular and aerodigestive injury should be done and prompt emergent surgical consultation if present. Overall management priorities for penetrating neck injuries focus on airway management, hemorrhage control, and damage control resuscitation before definitive surgical repair.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Use and Utility of Advanced Imaging in the Evaluation of Near-Hanging and Strangulation Injuries at a Canadian Level One Trauma Centre.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) of the neck is highly sensitive and may effectively rule-out cervical spine, cerebrovascular, and aerodigestive injuries after blunt and penetrating trauma. However, CT may be overutilized in the evaluation of hanging or strangulation injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of CT imaging among patients evaluated for hanging or strangulation mechanisms at a Canadian level-1 trauma center. METHODS: All adult patients evaluated for hanging or strangulation injuries over an eight-year period were reviewed. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of CT imaging for major aerodigestive, cervical spine, cerebrovascular, or neurological injuries. Multiple logistic regression were performed to determine predictive factors for the use of CT imaging and the identification of injury on imaging. RESULTS: Among 124 patients evaluated for hanging or strangulation injuries during the study period, 101 (80%) were evaluated with CT of the head or neck. A total of 26 injuries were identified in 21 patients (18 anoxic brain injuries, 4 aerodigestive, 3 cerebrovascular, and 1 of cervical spine injury). The overall diagnostic yield of neck CT for cervical injuries was 7.8%, 4.7% for laryngeal-tracheal injuries, 3.5% for carotid and vertebral artery injuries, and 1.1% for cervical spine injury. The diagnostic yield of CT head for anoxic brain injury was 22.8%. Factors predicting the use of CT imaging were abnormal physical exam findings (RR 1.7 95% CI [1.2, 2.3]) and transfer accepted by the trauma team leader (RR 1.3 95% CI [1.1, 1.5]). CONCLUSION: CT imaging is often used in the evaluation of patients presenting with hanging or strangulation mechanisms. Seven cerebrovascular, aerodigestive, or cervical spine injuries were identified on imaging during the study period, representing a diagnostic yield of 7%. No injuries were identified among patient with a normal GCS or physical exam. Factors predicting the use of CT imaging included transfer accepted by the trauma team leader and abnormal physical exam findings. The variable clinical presentation of near-hanging and strangulation injuries and the relatively low diagnostic yield of CT imaging should prompt the development of tools and institutional protocols to guide the evaluation of hanging and strangulation injuries.

Missed blunt cerebrovascular injuries using current screening criteria - The time for liberalized screening is now.

Diagnostic Criteria Study BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality associated with ischemic stroke attributable to blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) warrant aggressive screening. The Denver Criteria (DC) and Expanded Denver Criteria (eDC) have imprecise elements that can be difficult and subjective in application and can delay or prevent screening. We hypothesize these screening criteria lack adequate ability to consistently identify BCVI and that the use of a liberalized screening approach with CT angiography (CTA) is superior without increasing risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of trauma patients who presented between 2015-2020 with radiographically confirmed BCVI diagnosed using each institutions' liberalized screening protocol, defined as automatic CTA of the head and neck for all patients undergoing head and neck CT. Outcomes of interest included AKI, stroke, and death due to BCVI. Outcomes were reported as frequency, percent, and 95% confidence interval as calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method. Incidence of medical follow-up within 1 year of first medical visit was quantified as the median and inter-quartile range of days to follow-up visit. RESULTS: We identified 433 BCVI patients with a mean age of 45.2 (standard deviation 18.9) years, 256 men and 177 women, 1.73 m (0.10) tall, and weighed 80.3 kg (20.3). Forty-one patients had strokes (9.5% [95% confidence interval 6.9, 12.6] and 12 patients (2.8% [1.4, 4.5]) had mortality attributable to BCVI. Of 433 total cases, 132 (30.5% [26.2, 35.1]) would have been missed by DC and 150 (34.6% [30.2, 39.3]) by eDC. Incidence of AKI in our BCVI population was 6 (1.4% [0.01, 3.0]). CONCLUSIONS: BCVI would be missed over 30% of the time using the DC and eDC compared to liberalized use of screening CTA. Risk of AKI due to CTA did not occur at a clinically meaningful level, supporting liberal CTA screening.

Does treatment delay for blunt cerebrovascular injury affect stroke rate?: An EAST multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze injury characteristics and stroke rates between blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) with delayed vs non-delayed medical therapy. We hypothesized there would be increased stroke formation with delayed medical therapy. METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a 16 center, prospective, observational trial on BCVI. Delayed medial therapy was defined as initiation >24 hours after admission. BCVI which did not receive medical therapy were excluded. Subgroups for injury presence were created using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score >0 for AIS categories. RESULTS: 636 BCVI were included. Median time to first medical therapy was 62 hours in the delayed group and 11 hours in the non-delayed group (p < 0.001). The injury severity score (ISS) was greater in the delayed group (24.0 vs the non-delayed group 22.0, p <  0.001) as was the median AIS head score (2.0 vs 1.0, p <  0.001). The overall stroke rate was not different between the delayed vs non-delayed groups respectively (9.7% vs 9.5%, p = 1.00). Further evaluation of carotid vs vertebral artery injury showed no difference in stroke rate, 13.6% and 13.2%, p = 1.00 vs 7.3% and 6.5%, p = 0.84. Additionally, within all AIS categories there was no difference in stroke rate between delayed and non-delayed medical therapy (all N.S.), with AIS head >0 13.8% vs 9.2%, p = 0.20 and AIS spine >0 11.0% vs 9.3%, p = 0.63 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modern BCVI therapy is administered early. BCVI with delayed therapy were more severely injured. However, a higher stroke rate was not seen with delayed therapy, even for BCVI with head or spine injuries. This data suggests with competing injuries or other clinical concerns there is not an increased stroke rate with necessary delays of medical treatment for BCVI.

Existence of knowledge silos in the adult blunt cerebrovascular injury literature.

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) remain a significant source of disability and mortality among trauma patients. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether knowledge silos exist in the overall BCVI literature. METHODS: An object-oriented programmatic script written in Python programming language was used to extract and categorize articles and references on the topic of BCVI. Additionally, each BCVI article was searched for by digital object identifier in the other BCVI references to build a network analysis and visualize topic reference patterns. Analyses were performed using Stata V.14.2 (StataCorp). RESULTS: A total of 306 articles with 10 282 references were included for analysis. Of these, 24% (74) were published in neurosurgery journals, 45% (137) were published in trauma journals, and 31% (95) were published in a journal of another specialty. Similar proportions were found when categorized by author departmental affiliation. Trauma surgery authors disproportionately referenced articles in the trauma literature, compared with neurosurgeons (73.5% vs. 48.0%, p<0.0001), and other authors. The biggest factor influencing reference proportions was the specialty of the publishing journal. Finally, a network analysis revealed that there are more trauma BCVI articles, and there are more frequently cited trauma BCVI articles by all specialties. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the existence of a one-way knowledge silo in the BCVI literature. However, a robust preference by both trauma and neurosurgery to cite trauma references when publishing in trauma journals may indicate a possible conscious curating of citations by authors to increase the likelihood of publication. These observations highlight the need for an active role by journal editors, peer reviewers, and authors to actively foster diversity of citations and cross-specialty collaboration to improve dissemination of information between these specialties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Observational study.

Treatment strategies for patients with concurrent blunt cerebrovascular and traumatic brain injury.

Patients who present with traumatic brain injury (TBI) combined with blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) are difficult to manage, in part because treatment for each entity may exacerbate the other. It is necessary to develop a treatment paradigm that ensures maximum benefit while mitigating the opposing risks. A cohort of 150 patients from 2015 to present, with either internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or vertebral artery (VA) dissections or pseudoaneurysms, was cross-referenced with those who had sustained TBI. Of the 38 patients identified with both TBI and BCVI, 25 suffered ICA injuries, 10 had VA injuries and 3 had combined ICA/VA injuries. Unilateral BCVI occurred in 30 patients, while 8 had bilateral BCVI. Two patients required surgical intervention for TBI, and 5 patients required endovascular intervention for BCVI. Positive emboli detection studies (EDS) on transcranial dopplers (TCD) were demonstrated in 19 patients, with 9 patients having radiographic evidence of stroke. Anti-platelet therapy was initiated in 32 patients, and anti-coagulation in 10 patients, without new or worsening intracranial hemorrhages (ICH). Overall, 76% of patients were able to be discharged home or to rehabilitation, with good recovery demonstrated in 73% of the patients who had appropriate follow-up. In the setting of concurrent TBI and BCVI, use of anti-platelet/coagulation to prevent stroke can be safe if monitored closely. Here we describe a treatment paradigm which weighs the risk and benefits of therapies based on severity of ICH and stroke prevention, which tended to result in good disposition and recovery.

Posterior communicating artery injury and symptomatic vasospasm after high-energy blunt head injury: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Most of the published literature pertaining to blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is focused on extracranial arterial injury. Studies of intracranial arterial injury are relatively uncommon. OBSERVATIONS: The clinical course of a patient who sustained an injury to the right posterior communicating artery followed by infarction due to vasospasm after severe traumatic brain injury is presented, along with a focused literature review. LESSONS: Intracranial BCVI is uncommon, and this report may serve to raise awareness of BCVI management and the importance of recognizing symptomatic vasospasm due to BCVI.