First resuscitation of critical burn patients: progresses and problems.

Currently, the aim of the resuscitation of burn patients is to maintain end-organ perfusion with fluid intake as minimal as possible. To avoid excess intake, we can improve the estimation using computer methods. Parkland and Brooke are the commonly used formulas, and recently, a new, an easy formula is been used, i.e. the 'Rule of TEN'. Fluid resuscitation should be titrated to maintain the urine output of approximately 30-35 mL/h for an average-sized adult. The most commonly used fluids are crystalloid, but the phenomenon of creep flow has renewed interest in albumin. In severely burn patients, monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution together with lactate, ScvO2 and intraabdominal pressures is a good option. Nurse-driven protocols or computer-based resuscitation algorithms reduce the dependence on clinical decision making and decrease fluid resuscitation intake. High-dose vitamin C, propranolol, the avoidance of excessive use of morphine and mechanical ventilation are other useful resources.

Crystalloids and colloids in critical patient resuscitation.

Fluid resuscitation is essential for the survival of critically ill patients in shock, regardless of the origin of shock. A number of crystalloids and colloids (synthetic and natural) are currently available, and there is strong controversy regarding which type of fluid should be administered and the potential adverse effects associated with the use of these products, especially the development of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Recently, several clinical trials and metaanalyses have suggested the use of hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) to be associated with an increased risk of death and kidney failure, and data have been obtained showing clinical benefit with the use of crystalloids that contain a lesser concentration of sodium and chlorine than normal saline. This new information has increased uncertainty among clinicians regarding which type of fluid should be used. We therefore have conducted a review of the literature with a view to developing practical recommendations on the use of fluids in the resuscitation phase in critically ill adults.

Forum for debate: Safety of allogeneic blood transfusion alternatives in the surgical/critically ill patient.

In recent years, several safety alerts have questioned or restricted the use of some pharmacological alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion in established indications. In contrast, there seems to be a promotion of other alternatives, based on blood products and/or antifibrinolytic drugs, which lack a solid scientific basis. The Multidisciplinary Autotransfusion Study Group and the Anemia Working Group España convened a multidisciplinary panel of 23 experts belonging to different healthcare areas in a forum for debate to: 1) analyze the different safety alerts referred to certain transfusion alternatives; 2) study the background leading to such alternatives, the evidence supporting them, and their consequences for everyday clinical practice, and 3) issue a weighted statement on the safety of each questioned transfusion alternative, according to its clinical use. The members of the forum maintained telematics contact for the exchange of information and the distribution of tasks, and a joint meeting was held where the conclusions on each of the items examined were presented and discussed. A first version of the document was drafted, and subjected to 4 rounds of review and updating until consensus was reached (unanimously in most cases). We present the final version of the document, approved by all panel members, and hope it will be useful for our colleagues.

Perioperative colloids: From theory to practice.

INTRODUCTION: Fluid administration is the cornerstone in hypovolemic patient's reanimation. Clinical guidelines restrict colloid administration favouring crystalloids. Currently, we don't know exactly which is the daily clinical practice during the perioperative period. The objective of this study is to describe perioperative use of colloids analysing possible reasons aiming to use them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, cross-section, national, multicentre observational study. Fluid Day sub-study. We enrolled all patient's older than 18 years old who underwent surgery during the 24 h of the 2-days study (February, 2019, 18th and 20th). We registered demographic data, comorbidities, anaesthetic and surgical procedure data, fluids administered, perioperative bleeding and monitoring type used during the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 5928 cases were analysed and 542 patients (9.1%) received any type of colloids, being hydroxiethyl-starch the most frequently used (5.1%). Patients receiving colloids suffered more longing surgery (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), were urgently operated (13.7 vs. 7.5%) and were more frequent classified as high risk (22 vs. 4.8%). Their recovery was mostly in critical care units (45.1 vs.15.8%). Patients with bleeding less than 500 ml received colloids in a percentage of 5.9 versus 45.9% when this figure was overcome. Patients who received colloids were anaemic more frequently: 29.4 vs. 16.3%. Colloids administration had a higher risk for transfusion (OR 15.7). Advanced monitoring also increased the risk for receiving colloids (OR 9.43). CONCLUSIONS: In our environment with routine clinical practice, colloids administration is limited and close linked to perioperative bleeding.

Molecular analysis of autochthonous microbiota along the digestive tract of juvenile grouper Epinephelus coioides following probiotic Bacillus pumilus administration.

AIMS: To evaluate the diversity of dominant autochthonous microbiota along the digestive tract of juvenile Epinephelus coioides following the dietary administration of probiotic Bacillus pumilus for 60 days. METHODS AND RESULTS: Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) with subsequently sequencing analysis was used to assess the gut microbiota. Generally similar DGGE patterns were observed in the foregut, midgut and hindgut of E. coioides, while the similarity dendrogram clearly revealed three different clusters depending on the three compartments of the GI tract. Dietary administration of B. pumilus stimulated its colonization in each compartment of the digestive tract. Samples collected from the probiotic group and the control group showed similar DGGE patterns, and no significant difference in the total number of bands and the Shannon index were detected between the probiotic group and the control group, suggested that B. pumilus exert no significant effect on the gut microbiota. However, various potentially beneficial bacteria, such as uncultured Bacillus sp. clone QJNY94-like, Nitratireductor sp. YCSC5-like, Methylobacterium hispanicum-like and Microbacterium sp. YACS1-like bacteria were stimulated by probiotic B. pumilus, while the potential harmful Staphylococcus saprophyticus-like bacterium was depressed. CONCLUSIONS: Autochthonous gut microbiota of E. coioides was modulated to some degree, not significant, by probiotic B. pumilus, various potentially beneficial bacteria were selectively stimulated, while one potential harmful species was depressed. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This work represents the first report that dietary administration of probiotic B. pumilus modulated the gut microbiota of E. coioides. These findings broaden our understanding of probiotic effects at the gut level, which is helpful in understanding the mechanisms that underpin host benefits.

Ten answers to key questions for fluid management in intensive care.

This review focuses on fluid management of critically ill patients. The topic is addressed based on 10 single questions with simplified answers that provide clinicians with the basic information needed at the point of care in treating patients in the Intensive Care Unit. The review has didactic purposes and may serve both as an update on fluid management and as an introduction to the subject for novices in critical care. There is an urgent need to increase awareness regarding the potential risks associated with fluid overload. Clinicians should be mindful not only of the indications for administering fluid loads and of the type of fluids administered, but also of the importance to set safety limits. Lastly, it is important to implement proactive strategies seeking to establish negative fluid balance as soon as the clinical conditions are considered to be stable and the risk of deterioration is low.

Ten answers to key questions for fluid management in intensive care.

This review focuses on fluid management of critically ill patients. The topic is addressed based on 10 single questions with simplified answers that provide clinicians with the basic information needed at the point of care in treating patients in the Intensive Care Unit. The review has didactic purposes and may serve both as an update on fluid management and as an introduction to the subject for novices in critical care. There is an urgent need to increase awareness regarding the potential risks associated with fluid overload. Clinicians should be mindful not only of the indications for administering fluid loads and of the type of fluids administered, but also of the importance to set safety limits. Lastly, it is important to implement proactive strategies seeking to establish negative fluid balance as soon as the clinical conditions are considered to be stable and the risk of deterioration is low.

Clinical practice guide for the choice of perioperative volume-restoring fluid in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

The present Clinical practice guide responds to the clinical questions about security in the choice of fluid (crystalloid, colloid or hydroxyethyl starch 130) in patients who require volume replacement during perioperative period of non-cardiac surgeries. From the evidence summary, recommendations were made following the GRADE methodology. In this population fluid therapy based on crystalloids is suggested (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). In the events where volume replacement is not reached with crystalloids, the use of synthetic colloids (hydroxyethyl starch 130 or modified fluid gelatin) is suggested instead of 5% albumin (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). The choice and dosage of the colloid should be based in the product characteristics, patient comorbidity and anesthesiologist's experience.

[Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions]. / Coloides versus cristaloides em fluidoterapia guiada por objetivos, revisão sistemática e metanálise. Demasiadamente cedo ou demasiadamente tarde para obter conclusões.

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical trials on Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) were carried out, many of those using colloids in order to optimize the preload. After the decision of European Medicines Agency, there is such controversy regarding its use, benefits, and possible contribution to kidney failure. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the use of last-generation colloids, derived from corn, with crystalloids, in GDFT, to determine complications and mortality associated associated. METHODS: A bibliographic research was carried out in Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library, corroborating randomized clinical trials in those crystalloids are compared to colloids in GDFT for mayor non-cardiac surgery in adults. RESULTS: One hundred thirty references were found, among those 38 were selected, and 29 analyzed; of these, 6 were included for systematic review and meta-analysis, including 390 patients. It was perceived that the use of colloids it not associated with the increase of complications, but rather with a tendency to a higher mortality (RR [95% IC] 3.87 [1.121, 13, 38]); I(2)=0.0%; p=0.635). CONCLUSIONES: Due to this meta-analysis' limitations for small number of randomized clinical trials and patients included, the results should be taken cautiously, and it is proposed to carry out new randomized clinical trials, with enough statistical power, comparing balanced and non-balanced colloids to balanced and non-balanced crystalloids, following the protocols of GDFT, respecting current guidelines and suggestions made by groups of experts.

Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions.

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical trials on Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) were carried out, many of those using colloids in order to optimize the preload. After the decision of European Medicines Agency, there is such controversy regarding its use, benefits, and possible contribution to renal failure. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the use of last-generation colloids, derived from corn, with crystalloids in GDFT to determine associated complications and mortality. METHODS: A bibliographic research was carried out in MEDLINE PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, corroborating randomized clinical trials where crystalloids are compared to colloids in GDFT for major non-cardiac surgery in adults. RESULTS: One hundred thirty references were found and among those 38 were selected and 29 analyzed; of these, six were included for systematic review and meta-analysis, including 390 patients. It was observed that the use of colloids is not associated with the increase of complications, but rather with a tendency to a higher mortality (RR [95% CI] 3.87 [1.121-13.38]; I(2)=0.0%; p=0.635). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the limitations of this meta-analysis due to the small number of randomized clinical trials and patients included, the results should be taken cautiously, and the performance of new randomized clinical trials is proposed, with enough statistical power, comparing balanced and unbalanced colloids to balanced and unbalanced crystalloids, following the protocols of GDFT, considering current guidelines and suggestions made by groups of experts.

[Current role of albumin in critical care]. / Papel actual de la albúmina en cuidados críticos.

The use of colloids in fluid therapy has been, and still continues to be a controversial topic, particularly when referring to the critical patient. The choice of the fluid that needs to be administered depends on several factors, many of which are theoretical, and continue being an object of debate. The interest in the clinical use of the albumin has emerged again, immediately after recent publications in the search of the most suitable colloid. It is the most abundant protein in the plasma, being responsible for 80% of the oncotic pressure. It regulates the balance between the intra- and extra-vascular volumes. Recent multicenter studies question the supposed lack of safety that was previously assigned to it. Furthermore, in vitro studies demonstrate other important actions besides oncotic, for example neutralization of free radicals, and exogenous (drugs) and endogenous substances (bile pigments, cholesterol). Being aware of these secondary properties of albumin, and evaluating the pathophysiology of the critical patient (in particular, sepsis), to maintain plasma albumin levels within the normal range, could be of great importance. Based on the most recent publications, the aim of this review is to briefly analyze the pathophysiology of albumin, as well as to discuss its possible indications in the critical patient.

Coloides perioperatorios: de la teoría a la práctica / Perioperative colloids: From theory to practice

Introducción: La administración intravenosa de fluidos constituye un elemento fundamental en la reanimación de pacientes con hipovolemia. Las guías clínicas restringen el uso de coloides en favor de los cristaloides. Actualmente, no conocemos con exactitud cuál es la práctica clínica habitual al respecto durante el periodo perioperatorio. El objetivo del presente estudio es describir el uso perioperatorio de coloides y analizar las posibles causas que motivan su utilización. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico. Subanálisis del estudio Fluid Day. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 18 años sometidos a cirugía durante las 24h de los 2 días del estudio (18 y 20 de febrero de 2019). Se registraron datos demográficos, comorbilidades, datos referentes al acto anestésico y el procedimiento quirúrgico, fluidos administrados, sangrado perioperatorio y tipo de monitorización utilizado durante el periodo perioperatorio. Resultados: Se analizaron 5.928 casos. Un total de 542 pacientes (9,1%) recibieron algún tipo de coloides, siendo el hidroxietilalmidón el más utilizado (5,1%). Los pacientes que recibieron coloides tuvieron intervenciones más prolongadas (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), fueron intervenidos de urgencia (13,7 vs. 7,5%) y se clasificaron como de alto riesgo (22 vs. 4,8%) más frecuentemente. Su recuperación inmediata mayoritariamente transcurrió en unidades de críticos (45,1 vs.15,8%). Los pacientes que presentaron una hemorragia menor de 500ml recibieron coloides en un 5,9% frente al 45,9% cuando se superó esta cifra. Los pacientes que recibieron coloides presentaban anemia más frecuentemente: 29,4 vs. 16,3%. La administración de coloides supuso un mayor riesgo de transfusión (OR 15,7). La monitorización avanzada también aumentó la probabilidad de administrar coloides (OR 9,43). Conclusiones: En nuestro medio y en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual, la utilización de los coloides es escasa...(AU)

Introduction: Fluid administration is the cornerstone in hypovolemic patient's reanimation. Clinical guidelines restrict colloid administration favouring crystalloids. Currently, we don’t know exactly which is the daily clinical practice during the perioperative period. The objective of this study is to describe perioperative use of colloids analysing possible reasons aiming to use them. Material and Methods: Prospective, cross-section, national, multicentre observational study. Fluid Day sub-study. We enrolled all patient's older than 18 years old who underwent surgery during the 24h of the 2-days study (February, 2019, 18th and 20th). We registered demographic data, comorbidities, anaesthetic and surgical procedure data, fluids administered, perioperative bleeding and monitoring type used during the perioperative period. Results: A total of 5928 cases were analysed and 542 patients (9.1%) received any type of colloids, being hydroxiethyl-starch the most frequently used (5.1%). Patients receiving colloids suffered more longing surgery (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), were urgently operated (13.7 vs. 7.5%) and were more frequent classified as high risk (22 vs. 4.8%). Their recovery was mostly in critical care units (45.1 vs.15.8%). Patients with bleeding less than 500mL received colloids in a percentage of 5.9 versus 45.9% when this figure was overcome. Patients who received colloids were anaemic more frequently: 29.4 vs. 16.3%. Colloids administration had a higher risk for transfusion (OR 15.7). Advanced monitoring also increased the risk for receiving colloids (OR 9.43). Conclusions: In our environment with routine clinical practice, colloids administration is limited and close linked to perioperative bleeding.(AU)

Colloids versus crystalloids in objective-guided fluid therapy, systematic review and meta-analysis. Too early or too late to draw conclusions / Coloides versus cristaloides em fluidoterapia guiada por objetivos, revisão sistemática e metanálise. Demasiadamente cedo ou demasiadamente tarde para obter conclusões / Coloides versus cristaloides en fluidoterapia guiada por objetivos, revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Demasiado pronto o demasiado tarde para obtener conclusiones

Several clinical trials on Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) were carried out, many of those using colloids in order to optimize the preload. After the decision of European Medicines Agency, there is such controversy regarding its use, benefits, and possible contribution to renal failure. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the use of last-generation colloids, derived from corn, with crystalloids in GDFT to determine associated complications and mortality.

Foram feitos múltiplos ensaios clínicos em fluidoterapia guiada por objetivos (FGO), muitos deles com o uso de coloides para aprimoramento da pré-carga. Após a decisão da Agência Europeia de Medicamentos, existe ainda controvérsia sobre seu uso, seus benefícios e sua possível contribuição para a falência renal. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática e metanálise é comparar o uso de coloides de última geração, derivados de milho, com cristaloides em FGO para determinar as complicações e a mortalidade associadas.

Se han realizado múltiples ensayos clínicos en fluidoterapia guiada por objetivos (FGO), muchos de ellos con el uso de coloides para la optimización de la precarga. Tras la decisión de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento, existe cierta controversia en cuanto a su utilización, beneficios y su posible contribución al fallo renal. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis es comparar el uso de coloides de última generación, derivados del maíz, con cristaloides en FGO para determinar las complicaciones y la mortalidad asociadas.

Fluid therapy for septic shock resuscitation: which fluid should be used? / Fluidoterapia para a ressuscitação no choque séptico: qual tipo de fluido deve ser utilizado?

Early resuscitation of septic shock patients reduces the sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. The main goals of septic shock resuscitation include volemic expansion, maintenance of adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery, guided by central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed or central venous oxygen saturation and arterial lactate levels. An aggressive fluid resuscitation, possibly in association with vasopressors, inotropes and red blood cell concentrate transfusion may be necessary to achieve those hemodynamic goals. Nonetheless, even though fluid administration is one of the most common interventions offered to critically ill patients, the most appropriate type of fluid to be used remains controversial. According to recently published clinical trials, crystalloid solutions seem to be the most appropriate type of fluids for initial resuscitation of septic shock patients. Balanced crystalloids have theoretical advantages over the classic solutions, but there is not enough evidence to indicate it as first-line treatment. Additionally, when large amounts of fluids are necessary to restore the hemodynamic stability, albumin solutions may be a safe and effective alternative. Hydroxyethyl starches solutions must be avoided in septic patients due to the increased risk of acute renal failure, increased need for renal replacement therapy and increased mortality. Our objective was to present a narrative review of the literature regarding the major types of fluids and their main drawbacks in the initial resuscitation of the septic shock patients.

A ressuscitação precoce de pacientes com choque séptico tem o potencial de reduzir sua morbidade e mortalidade. Os objetivos principais da ressuscitação no choque séptico incluem expansão volêmica, manutenção da perfusão tecidual e da oferta de oxigênio para os tecidos, guiados pela pressão venosa central, pressão arterial média, saturação venosa mista ou central de oxigênio e lactato arterial. Uma ressuscitação agressiva com fluidos, possivelmente em associação com vasopressores, inotrópicos e transfusão de concentrado de hemácias, pode ser necessária para atingir estes objetivos hemodinâmicos. Todavia, embora a administração de fluidos seja uma das intervenções mais comumente realizada em pacientes graves, o tipo de fluido mais apropriado para ser utilizado permanece controverso e incerto. De acordo com os estudos clínicos mais recentes, os cristaloides são os fluidos de escolha para serem utilizados na ressuscitação inicial de pacientes com choque séptico. As soluções cristaloides balanceadas possuem vantagens teóricas em relação as não balanceadas, porém ainda não há evidências suficientes para indicá-las como tratamento de primeira escolha. Além disso, albumina humana parece ser uma alternativa segura e efetiva quando grandes quantidades de fluidos são necessárias para o restabelecimento da estabilidade hemodinâmica. O uso de soluções de hidroxetilamido deve ser evitado em pacientes sépticos, devido ao maior risco de desenvolvimento de insuficiência renal aguda, necessidade de terapia de substituição renal e aumento de mortalidade. O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar uma revisão narrativa da literatura sobre os principais tipos de fluidos e os problemas mais importantes na ressuscitação inicial de pacientes com choque séptico.

Long-term following-up of viability of spleen autotransplants in the Beagle canine model / Avaliação em longo prazo da viabilidade do autotransplante de baço em cães Beagle

PURPOSE: To examine the possible late complications of splenectomy or spleen autotransplantation in large laboratory animal model, in which we need non-invasive or minimal-invasive methods for long-term monitoring of the experimental animals. METHODS: Experimental groups of beagle dogs were: non-operated control, sham-operated control, splenectomy, spleen autotransplantation with 5 or 10 spleen-chips taken into the greater omentum (Furka's technique). Prior to operations, on the 1st postoperative week, monthly till the 6th as well as in the 9th and 12th month, hemorheological examinations were performed. In postoperative 12th month colloid scintigraphy and diagnostic laparoscopy were carried out. At the end of the investigation comparative morphological examinations were performed, too. RESULTS: From the 4th-5th postoperative month filtration function of spleen-autotransplants showed particular restoration compared to splenectomy group. However, the functional results did not reach the values of the control or sham-operated groups. Sham-operated control's scintigraphy nicely showed activity in the spleen. In spleen autotransplantation-groups scintigraphy indicated well the activity of spleen-chips. During diagnostic laparoscopy spleen-chips with their blood supply were found. Histologically, the structure of spleen­autotransplants was similar to normal splenic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The autotransplants are regenerated, their functions have been partly restored, and thus spleen autotransplantation may prevent the possible complications of splenectomy. These parameters and the presented investigative protocol are suitable for long-term following-up of viability of the spleen-autotransplants.

OBJETIVO: Examinar as possíveis complicações tardias da esplenectomia ou do autotransplante de baço em modelo animal de grande porte, no qual faz-se necessário o uso de métodos não invasivos ou minimamente invasivos para monitorizar os animais de experimentação. MÉTODOS: Grupos experimentais de cães beagle foram: não-operados controle, sham-operados controle, esplenectomia, autotransplante de baço com 5 ou 10 fatias de baço colocados no grande omento (técnica de Furka). Antes das operações, na 1ª semana de pós­operatório, mensalmente até 6o.assim como no 9º. e 12º. mês, foram realizados exames hemorreológicos. No 12º. mês de pós-operatório, cintilografia colóide e laparoscopia diagnóstica foram realizadas. Ao final do experimento, exames morfológicos comparativos foram realizados também. RESULTADOS: A partir do 4º-5º mês pós-operatório, a função de filtração dos baços autotransplantados mostraram particular restauração comparados ao grupo esplenectomia. Entretanto, os resultados funcionais não alcançaram os valores dos grupos controle ou sham-operados. A cintilografia dos controles sham-operados mostraram atividade no baço. Nos grupos de autotransplante, a cintilografia indicou bem a atividade das fatias de baço. Durante a laparoscopia diagnóstica, as fatias de baço com seu suprimento sanguíneo foram encontrados. Histologicamente, a estrutura dos autotransplantes de baço foi similar ao tecido normal de baço. CONCLUSÕES: Os autotransplantes são regenerados, suas funções foram parcialmente restauradas, e então ao autotransplantate esplênico pode prevenir as possíveis complicações da esplenectomia. Estes parâmetros e o protocolo experimental são adequados para o seguimento em longo prazo da viabilidade de autotransplantes esplênicos.

Quiste coloide del tercer ventrículo / Colloid cyst of the third ventricle

Los quistes coloides son lesiones intracraniales con una incidencia calculada en tres individuos por millón de personas en un año. Son tumores benignos de la porción anterosuperior del tercer ventrículo. El flujo normal del líquido cefalorraquídeo puede ser interrumpido por un gran quiste que obstruya el foramen de Monro. Los signos y síntomas asociados engloban un espectro amplio de características, desde una cefalea o específica hasta datos de hipertensión intracraneal; algunos quistes coloides se dan en el comienzo agudo de una hidrocefalia y pueden llevar a una muerte súbita. Caso: presentamos el caso de un adolescente masculino de 13 años de edad, de raza negra, quien dos días antes de su fallecimiento había manifestado cefalea. Al examen de autopsia se evidenció un quiste coloide del tercer ventrículo que produjo una hidrocefalia aguda obstructiva, con edema cerebral severo y herniación de amígdalas cerebelosas. En este artículo comentamos las características principales del quiste coloide y realizamos una breve revisión bibliográfica...

Evidencia actual sobre el uso de soluciones coloides versus cristaloides durante la reanimación del paciente con shock / Current evidence onthe use of solutions colloids versus crystalloids during the reanimation patient-with shock

La administración de fluidos intravenosos, es uno de los pilares de la reanimación del paciente en shock y su beneficio es mayor cuanto antes se inicie. Los fluidos más utilizados para tal objeto son las soluciones cristaloides (solución salina y Ringer Lactato) y los coloides (albumina, gel, dextrán y almidones). Estudios fisiológicos y clínicos han demostrado que los coloides y los cristaloides tienen diferentes efectos y perfiles de seguridad. Por otra parte, ambos tipos de fluidos administrados en exceso o a destiempo pueden tener efectos perjudiciales. Estudios clínicos recientes parecen coincidir que, en general, los coloides no ofrecen mayor beneficio clínico que los cristaloides y se asocian a mayor tasa de eventos adversos. Por tanto, el presente artículo pretende describir las ventajas y limitaciones de los tipos de soluciones que se utilizan para la reanimación de los pacientes críticos en base a literatura más reciente.

The administration of intravenous fluids, is a mainstay of patient resuscitation in shock and your benefit is greater the earlier it starts. The fluids commonly used for this purpose are crystalloid solutions (saline and Ringer Lactate) and colloids (albumin, gel, dextran and starch). Physiological and clinical studies have shown that colloids and crystalloids have different effects and safety profiles. Moreover, both ty-pes of fluids administered in excess or untimely can have detrimental effects. Recent clinical studies seem to agree that, in general, colloids offer no greater clinical benefit than crystalloids and are associated with increased rate of adverse events. Therefore, this article aims to describe the advantages and limitations of the types of solutions used for resuscitation of critically ill patients based on recent literature.

Reposición de volumen en el politraumatizado / Volume reposition in trauma

El manejo actual de los pacientes traumatizados, que constituyen un desafío, se realiza en varias fases, en función de las características de las lesiones y la capacidad de los equipos de rescate y reanimación. La hemorragia masiva constituye la principal causa de muerte en estos pacientes y la reposición de volumen debe enfocarse con una variedad de productos, comenzando con los cristaloides y en función de la evolución y respuesta a estos, la utilización de coloides y finalmente los Hemoderivados. Cada uno de estos productos presenta ventajas y problemas, y continúa siendo el juicio clínico el principal criterio en su utilización ya que, en el contexto de esta situación de emergencia, el laboratorio suele ir detrás de la realidad. El control de la hemorragia es uno de los principales objetivos a lograr, sin el cual ninguna otra medida médica evitará la muerte de estos pacientes.

Trauma patients represent a challenge for health providers. Clinical management has to be provided accordignly to their medical conditions, injuries and also to the level of experience of the emergency room team. Because massive bleeding is the main cause of death in this group of patients, volume reposition has to be one of the most important goals in order to improve their survival outcome. This is the reason why it is important in health providers a solid knowledge of volume replacement algorithms in trauma cases. Volume reposition algorithms usually recommend starting with cristaloid solutions, following with coloids and finally hemoderivatives. All these products have their own advantages but also disadvantages, being the clinical judgement the most important tool in order to know when and how to use them. In the trauma field, the laboratory tests are often not available or their results are too slow to wait for. We still need to set in the future the advantages of oxygen carrying substances (or substitutes) to improve survival rates in the field of trauma.

Reposição volêmica perioperatória / Perioperative volemic repositioning

Justificativa e objetivos: a reposição volêmica perioperatória tem sido alvo de inúmeros trabalhos, focando-se no debate entre o uso de criataloides ou coloides, bem como reposição restritiva ou liberal. Como ainda não existe consenso nesse assunto que interessa a todos os anestesiologistas, foi escrito este artigo objetivando esclarecer asprincipais vantagens e desvantagens de cada tipo de fluido utilizado na reposição volêmica perioperatória. Conteúdo: são apresentados sucintamente os diferentes tipos de fluidos utilizados para repor o volume, as possíveis vantagens e desvantagens de cada um, bem como seus efeitos adversos. Conclusões: a reposição volêmica deve integrar o conhecimento dos fluidos utilizados, com o volume total administrado e os procedimentos específicos, pois diferentes procedimentos têm diferentes fisiopatologias de distribuição dos fluidos.

Justification and purposes: The perioperative volemic reposition has been the focus of several studies which discuss the use of crystalloids or colloids, as well as the restrictive or unrestrictive repositioning. As there has been no consensus on this issue which is of interest to all anesthesiologists, this paper has been written with the purpose of explaining the main advantages and disadvantages of each type of fluid used in the perioperativevolemic repositioning. Content: Different types of fluids used to reposition the volume, possible advantages and disadvantages of each one as well as their adverse effects are briefly shown in this article. Conclusions: In order to better understand the volemic repositioning it is important to know about the fluids used, the total volume administered and the specific procedures, as different procedures have different pathophysiologies of fluid distribution.

Cisto coloide no terceiro ventrículo e morte súbita em jovem / Colloid cyst in the third ventricle and sudden death in young man

Morte súbita de jovem, sexo masculino, 23 anos, assintomático, suscitou verificação de óbito. Antes queixou-se de cefaleia excruciante, em sala de aula, caindo sobre o computador. Encéfalo apresentou edema e congestão vascular. Sem herniações. Cortes coronais evidenciaram dilatação dos ventrículos laterais e nódulo aderido ao teto do terceiro ventrículo. À microscopia o diagnóstico foi cisto coloide do terceiro ventrículo. A ameaça de morte súbita em portadores de cisto coloide é sério problema diagnóstico na emergência médica. A relevância deste caso está em lembrar aos médicos que esta entidade deve permanecer como diagnóstico diferencial nas cefaleias em crianças, adolescentes e adultos jovens.

Sudden death of 23 year-old asymptomatic male patient led to further investigation into its cause. Previously, he had complained of excruciating headache in the classroom, falling on the computer. His brain showed edema and vascular congestion without herniation. Coronal sections showed dilatation of the lateral ventricles and nodule attached to the roof of the third ventricle. The microscopic diagnosis was colloid cyst of third ventricle. The threat of sudden death among colloid cyst patients is a serious diagnostic problem in medical emergencies. The relevance of this case is to remind doctors that this entity should remain as differential diagnosis in headaches among children, adolescents and young adults.