Prognostic risk factors in 113 patients undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma. / Factores de mal pronóstico en 113 pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía cefálica por colangiocarcinoma distal.

INTRODUCTION: Distal cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant epithelial neoplasia that affects the extrahepatic bile ducts, below the cystic duct. No relevant relationship between perioperative factors and worse long-term outcome has been proved. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk factors for mortality and long-term recurrence of distal cholangiocarcinoma in resected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective database of patients operated on for distal cholangiocarcinoma between 1990 and 2021 was analyzed in order to investigate mortality and recurrence factors. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients have undergone surgery, with mean actuarial survival of 100.2 (76-124) months after resection. The bivariate study did not show differences between patients depending on age or preoperative variables studied. When multivariate analysis was performed, the presence of affected adenopathy was a risk factor for long-term mortality. The presence of affected lymph nodes, tumor recurrence, and biliary fistula during the postoperative period implied worse actuarial survival when comparing the Kaplan-Meier curves. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of affected lymph nodes influence the prognosis of the disease. The occurrence of biliary fistula during postoperative cholangiocarcinoma distal could aggravate long-term outcomes, a finding that should be reaffirmed in future studies.

The origins of oncological pancreatic surgery in Spain. A tribute to pioneers. / Inicios de la cirugía pancreática oncológica en España. Un tributo a los pioneros.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a very complex operation. Its development took place very slowly at the most prestigious centers in the world. The aim of this investigation is to know who were the first surgeons to perform a PD in Spain as well as its historical circumstances. Despite all kinds of difficulties and very few resources, the first PD in Spain were carried out in Barcelona at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau where from the mid-50s a school of gastrointestinal surgery emerged with surgeons soon to become the spearhead of the Spanish surgery and a reference for the whole country: Pi-Figueras, Vicente Artigas, Antonio Soler-Roig and Antonio Llauradó. Almost simultaneously, in Oviedo, Luis Estrada also introduced the PD and total pancreaticoduodenectomy after a period of training with the pioneers of pancreatic surgery in the United States.

Surgical treatment of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours based on three clinical scenarios. / Tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores neuroendocrinos no funcionantes de páncreas basado en 3 escenarios clínicos.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NFPNET) is resection in locally pancreatic disease, or with resectable liver metastases. There is controversy about unresectable liver disease. METHODS: We analysed the perioperative data and survival outcome of 63 patients who underwent resection of NFPNET between 1993 and 2012. They were divided into 3 scenarios: A, pancreatic resection (44patients); B, pancreatic and liver resection in synchronous resectable liver metastases (12patients); and C, pancreatic resection in synchronous unresectable liver metastases (6patients). The prognostic factors for survival and recurrence were studied. RESULTS: Distal pancreatectomy (51%) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (38%) were more frequently performed. Associated surgery was required in 44% of patients, including synchronous liver resections in 9patients. Two patients received a liver transplant during follow-up. According to the WHO classification they were distributed into G1: 10 (16%), G2: 45 (71%), and G3: 8 (13%). The median hospital stay was 11days. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 49% and 1.6%, respectively. At the closure of the study, 43 (68%) patients were still alive, with a mean actuarial survival of 9.6years. The WHO classification and tumour recurrence were risk factors of mortality in the multivariate analysis. The median actuarial survival by scenarios was 131months (A), 102months (B), and 75months (C) without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the treatment for NFPNET without distant disease. Resectable liver metastases in well-differentiated tumours must be resected. The resection of the pancreatic tumour with unresectable synchronous liver metastasis must be considered in well-differentiated NFPNET. The WHO classification grade and recurrence are risk factors of long-term mortality.

Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has demonstrated in colorectal surgery a reduction in morbidity and length of stay without compromising security. Experience with ERAS programs in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still limited. The aims of this study were first to evaluate the applicability of an ERAS program for PD patients in our hospital, and second to analyze the postoperative results. METHODS: A retrospective study using a prospectively maintained database identified 41 consecutive PD included in an ERAS program. Key elements studied were early removal of tubes and drainages, early oral feeding and early mobilization. Variables studied were mortality, morbidity, perioperative data, length of stay, re-interventions and inpatient readmission. This group of patients was compared with an historic control group of 44 PD patients with a standard postoperative management. RESULTS: A total of 85 pancreatoduodenectomies were analyzed (41 patients in the ERAS group, and 44 patients in the control group. General mortality was 2.4% (2 patients) belonging to the control group. There were no statistical differences in mortality, length of stay in intensive care, reoperationss, and readmissions. ERAS group had a lower morbidity rate than the control group (32 vs. 48%; P=.072), as well as a lower length of stay (14.2 vs. 18.7 days). All the key ERAS proposed elements were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS programs may be implemented safely in pancreaticoduodenectomy. They may reduce the length of stay, unifying perioperative care and diminishing clinical variability and hospital costs.

Whipple's cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pyloric-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists in the literature as to the best technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), whether pyloric preservation (PP-CPD) or Whipple's technique (with antrectomy [W-CPD]), the former being associated with a higher frequency of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study between PP-CPD technique (n = 124 patients) and W-CPD technique (n = 126 patients), in patients who were operated for tumors of the pancreatic head and periampullary region between the period 2012 and 2023. RESULTS: Surgical time was longer, although not significant, with the W-CPD technique. Pancreatic and peripancreatic tumor invasion (p = 0.031) and number of lymph nodes resected (p < 0.0001) reached statistical significance in W-CPD, although there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymph node tumor invasion. Regarding postoperative morbimortality (medical complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula [POPF], hemorrhage, RVG, re-interventions, in-hospital mortality, Clavien-Dindo complications), ICU and hospital stay, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. During follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the groups for morbidity and mortality at 90 days and survival at 1, 3 and 5 years. Binary logistic regression analysis for DGE showed that binary relevant POPF grade B/C was a significant risk factor for DGE. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival were not significantly different with PP-CPD and W-CPD, but POPF grade B/C was a risk factor for DGE grade C.

Cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy in octogenarian patients with pancreatic tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Current literature supports the claim that performing a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) as treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with an increase in median survival, both in octogenarian (≥80 years) patients as well as younger patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective and comparative trial, comparing results for CPD performed on 30 patients ≥80 years with PC and 159 patients <80 years. RESULTS: The patients in the octogenarian group showed a significantly higher rate of preoperative cardiovascular morbidity and a more aggressive tumoral behaviour, including more significant preoperative anemia, jaundice and levels of CA 19-9, higher vascular and neural invasion, and a lower rate of R0 resection despite using the same surgical technique. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications. Postoperative mortality was similar in both groups (3.3% in octogenarians vs 3.1% in patients <80 years). Mortality during follow-up was mainly due to tumour recurrence, cardiovascular complications and COVID-19 in 2 elderly patients. Actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was significantly larger for patients <80 years old, as compared to octogenarians (85.9%, 61.1% and 39.2% versus 72.7%, 28.9% and 9.6%, respectively; P = 0.001). The presence of a pancreatic fistula and not using external Wirsung stenting were significantly associated with 90-day postoperative mortality after a CPD. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality post-CPD is similar in octogenarians and patients younger than 80, although long-term survival is shorter due to more aggressive tumours and comorbidities associated with older age.

Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018. The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients ≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23'9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients ≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P = .037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9% vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged ≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P = .050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the ≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P = .017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.

Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely? / Duodenopancreatectomía por adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas en ancianos. ¿Podemos asumirla con seguridad?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.

Positive Resection Margins Detected by Standardized Study of a Pancreaticoduodenectomy Sample: Is There Any Real Impact on Long-term Survival? / Margen de resección positivo tras la aplicación de un examen estandarizado de la muestra de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica: ¿tiene un impacto real en la supervivencia a largo plazo?

INTRODUCTION: The pathological evaluation of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) samples and the impact of R1 resections on survival has recently been questioned. This study evaluates the introduction of a standardized pathology study protocol (PSP) and the prognosis of R1 resections after long-term follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed data from a prospectively maintained database regarding 109 periampullary tumors treated by PD from 2005 to 2013. The results of the introduction of a PSP were analysed, and the recurrence rate (RR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the R1 resections were evaluated for each positive margin. RESULTS: The PD specimens of periampullary tumors analyzed by PSP showed a higher rate of isolated lymph nodes (17 vs. 8; P=.003), N+ (60% vs. 31%; P<.001), microvascular invasion (67% vs. 34%; P=.001) and R1 resections (42% vs. 18%; P=.010). Pancreatic adenocarcinomas with R1 resection in the PSP group were compared with R0, presenting higher percentages of vascular resections (P=.033), N+ (P=.029), lymphatic and perineural invasion (P=.047; P=.029), higher RR (P=.026), lower DFS (P=.016) and lower OS (P=.025). Invasion of the medial margin correlated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our series shows an increase in R1 resection after the introduction of a PSP. Infiltration of the medial margin seems to be associated with a higher RR and a decrease in DFS and OS.

Long-term results of resection of the head of the pancreas due to chronic pancreatitis: Pancreaticoduodenectomy or duodenum-preserving cephalic pancreatectomy? / Resultados a largo plazo sobre la resección de la cabeza pancreática por pancreatitis crónica: ¿duodenopancreatectomía cefálica o pancreatectomía cefálica con preservación duodenal?

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain in chronic pancreatitis is difficult to manage. The objective of our study is to assess the control of pain that is refractory to medical treatment in patients with an inflammatory mass in the head of the pancreas, as well as to compare the two surgical techniques. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients treated surgically between 1989 and 2011 who had been refractory to medical treatment with inflammation of the head of the pancreas. An analysis of the short and long-term results was done to compare patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and/or resection of the head of the pancreas with duodenal preservation (RHPDP). RESULTS: 22 PD and 12 RHPDP were performed. Postoperative complications were observed in 14% of patients, the most frequent being delayed gastric emptying (14.7%) and pancreatic fistula (11.7%). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of surgical technique. Pain control was satisfactory in 85% of patients, 43% presented de novo diabetes mellitus, and 88% returned to their work activities. Fourteen patients died during follow-up, 7 due to malignancies, and some were related to tobacco use and alcohol consumption. The overall 5 and 10 year survival rates were 88% and 75% respectively. CONCLUSION: Cephalic resection in patients with intractable pain in chronic pancreatitis is an effective therapy that provides good long-term results in terms of pain control, with no significant differences between the two surgical techniques. Patients with chronic pancreatitis have a high mortality rate associated with de novo malignancies.

Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Surgical results of 27 patients treated at a single center. / Adenocarcinoma duodenal: resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de una serie unicéntrica de 27 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy. Given the rarity of the disease, there is limited data related to resection results. The objective is to analyze results at our hospital after the curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA). METHODS: The variables were retrospectively collected from patients operated on between 1990 and 2017 at our hospital. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were treated. Twenty-three patients (85%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 4 patients (15%) with tumors located in the third and fourth portions of the duodenum underwent segmental duodenal resection. The overall postoperative morbidity was 67% (18 patients). Postoperative mortality was 7% (2 patients); however, postoperative mortality related to surgery was 4% (1 patient). All patients had negative resection margins. A median of 18 lymph nodes (range, 0-38) were retrieved and evaluated, with a median of 1 involved node (range, 0-8). Median follow up was 23 (9-69.7) months. Actuarial overall survival was 62.2 (25.2-99.1) months. Actuarial disease-free survival was 49 (0-133) months. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with a high morbidity, although it achieves considerable survival. Depending on the tumor location and if there is no pancreatic infiltration, segmental duodenal resection with negative margins is an alternative to cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Colangiocarcinoma tubulopapilar, una entidad emergente poco frecuente, a propósito de un caso

Objetivo: realizar una revisión bibliográfica y presentación de caso de colangiocarcinoma tubulopapilar. Material y Método: Se revisó la ficha médica y las características clínicas, radiológicas y patológicas del tumor, y la literatura científica respecto al carcinoma tubulopapilar. Caso Clínico: Paciente con ictericia progresiva asociado a baja de peso. El estudio imagenológico muestra amputación del tercio distal del colédoco por tejido de partes blandas, sugerente de colangiocarcinoma. Se realiza endosonografía, arrojando "fragmentos superficiales de adenocarcinoma tubulopapilar". Se realiza duodenopancreatectomía cefálica y, posteriormente, se inicia quimioterapia. Discusión: El colangiocarcinoma es una neoplasia de la vía biliar. Existen diferentes variantes histológicas, entre ellas el colangiocarcinoma tubulopapilar. Su diagnóstico se basa en estudios imagenológicos y anatomopatológicos. El principal hallazgo imagenológico va a depender del patrón de crecimiento tumoral; masiforme, periductal o intraductal. Dentro de los intraductales, se describe un carcinoma biliar con crecimiento tubulopapilar, con fenotipo pancreatobiliar epitelial. En los últimos años han sido de interés por tener mejor pronóstico. Conclusión: El colangiocarcinoma tubulopapilar es una variante histológica poco frecuente del colangiocarcinoma, que se asocia a un mejor pronóstico que otras variantes.

Objective: To conduct a literature review and present a case study of tubulopapillary cholangiocarcinoma. Material and Method: The clinical record and the clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics of the tumor were reviewed, along with the scientific literature regarding tubulopapillary carcinoma. Case Report: Patient with progressive jaundice associated with weight loss. Imaging studies show amputation of the distal third of the common bile duct by soft tissue, suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma. Endosonography was performed, yielding "superficial fragments of tubulopapillary adenocarcinoma." Subsequently, a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is performed, followed by chemotherapy. Discussion: Cholangiocarcinoma is a neoplasm of the biliary tract. There are different histological variants, including tubulopapillary cholangiocarcinoma. Its diagnosis is based on imaging and pathological studies. The main imaging finding will depend on the pattern of tumor growth: mass-forming, periductal, or intraductal. Among the intraductal types, a biliary carcinoma with tubulopapillary growth and an epithelial pancreatobiliary phenotype has been described. In recent years, they have been of interest due to their better prognosis. Conclusion: Tubulopapillary cholangiocarcinoma is a rare histological variant of cholangiocarcinoma that is associated with a better prognosis than other variants.

De trastorno neuropsiquiátrico a insulinoma, corrección diagnóstica y resolución mediante resección pancreática mayor / From a neuropsychiatric disorder to the correct diagnosis of insulinoma resolved by major pancreatic resection

RESUMEN El insulinoma es un tumor pancreático poco frecuente con una incidencia del 0,4%, generalmente benigno. Se presenta más frecuentemente en mujeres con una relación 2:1. Es el tumor neuroendocrino funcionante más común del páncreas1, responsable del 70 al 75% de hiperinsulinemía en la práctica clínica. El diagnóstico suele representar un desafío, y el retraso diagnóstico poner en riesgo la vida del paciente. El tratamiento quirúrgico es curativo en más del 90% de los casos; la táctica conservadora, siempre que sea posible, es la de elección. Informamos acerca de una duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC) por insulinoma en un paciente de sexo masculino, con mala interpretación diagnóstica previa de enfermedad neuropsiquiátrica y tratado con anticonvulsivantes.

ABSTRACT Insulinomas are rare pancreatic tumors usually benign with an incidence of 0.4%. They are more common in women with a female-to-male ratio of 2:1. It is the most common functioning neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas and is responsible for 70-75% of hyperinsulinemia in clinical practice1. The diagnosis is often a challenge, and a delay in diagnosis can have serious consequences for the patient. Surgical treatment is curative in more than 90% of cases, and the conservative approach is the treatment of choice whenever possible. We report the case of a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) due to an insulinoma in a male patient with a previous misdiagnosis of a neuropsychiatric disorder treated with anticonvulsants.

Duodenopancreatectomía cefálica con resección vascular laparoscópica / Laparoscopic cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy with laparoscopic vascular resection

RESUMEN Antecedentes: la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC) con resección vascular venosa está indicada para el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma ductal y de tumores neuroendocrinos de páncreas, tanto por laparoscopia como por laparotomía. Objetivo: describir los resultados de una serie de pacientes operados de DPC con resección vascular venosa y comparar la morbimortalidad entre los abordados por laparoscopia y por laparotomía. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional, comparativo, retrospectivo de pacientes con DPC con resección vascular entre enero de 2022 y agosto de 2023. El abordaje laparoscópico fue determinado en menores de 80 años, invasión venosa tumoral igual a 180° o menor en la tomografía, buen performance status, y no haber realizado tratamiento neoadyuvante. Resultados: fueron realizadas 23 DPC con resección vascular venosa: 11 por laparoscopia y 12 por laparotomía. Las 11 realizadas por laparoscopia fueron resecciones laterales, y, en los 12 abordados por laparotomía, se realizó resección total de vena porta en 5 y en el resto, resección lateral. El tiempo de "clampeo" (pinzamiento) portal y la necesidad de transfusiones fue similar en ambos grupos. El estudio patológico reveló R0 en el 78,2% de los pacientes e invasión venosa en el 40.9%. La morbilidad con laparoscopia y con laparotomía consistió, respectivamente, en: fístula pancreática en 7 (4 y 3), vaciamiento gástrico retardado en 4 (1 y 4), fístula biliar en uno (1 y 0), neumonía en dos (1 y 1) e infección de herida en uno (0 y 1). La mortalidad fue de 8,6% por el fallecimiento de dos pacientes, uno en cada grupo. Conclusión: de acuerdo con los criterios empleados, la morbimortalidad de la DPC con resección vascular fue similar por laparoscopia y por laparotomía.

ABSTRACT Background: Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD) with venous resection is indicated for the treatment of ductal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas, either through laparoscopy or laparotomy. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the results of a series of patients undergoing CPD with venous vascular resection and compare morbidity and mortality between the laparoscopic approach and open surgery. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective, comparative and observational study of patients who underwent CPD with venous vascular resection between January 2022 and July 2023. Criteria for laparoscopic surgery were age < 80 years, interface between tumor and vein of 180° of the circumference of the vessel wall or less on computed tomography, good performance status, and no previous neoadjuvant treatment. Results: A total of 23 CPD procedures with venous vascular resection were performed: 11 by laparoscopy and 12 by laparotomy. The 11 laparoscopic procedures were lateral resections, and in the 12 patients approached by laparotomy, 5 were total portal vein resections and 7 were lateral resections. Portal vein clamping time and need for transfusion was similar in both groups. The pathological examination reported R0 resections in 78.2% and venous invasion in 40.9%. The complications associated with laparoscopy and laparotomy were pancreatic fistula in 4 and 3 patients, respectively, delayed gastric emptying in 1 and 4 patients, respectively, biliary fistula in 1 and 0 patients, respectively, aspiration pneumonia i 1 and 1 patients, respectively and surgical site infection in 0 and 1 patients, respectively. Mortality was 8.6% (n =2), one in each group. Conclusion: According to the criteria used, the morbidity and mortality of CPD with vascular resection were similar for laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Morbilidad y mortalidad de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica convencional en pacientes con enfermedad del confluente biliopancreático

Introducción: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica es una operación cada vez más frecuente en pacientes seleccionados. Objetivo: Identificar la morbilidad y la mortalidad concerniente a la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica convencional. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo de una serie de 15 casos operados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica. Se investigaron las variables: estadificación según clasificación tumor, linfonódulo, metástasis (TNM), diagnóstico anatomopatológico, complicaciones, tiempo quirúrgico y estado al egreso. Se utilizaron el número absoluto y el porcentaje como medidas de resumen para las variables estadificación y diagnóstico; la media, la mediana y el rango para el tiempo quirúrgico y el intervalo de confianza para el estado al egreso. Resultados: El diagnóstico anatomopatológico principal fue adenocarcinoma de páncreas con 9 pacientes (60,1 %) y de duodeno con 2 (13,3 %). El estadio posoperatorio IIA fue el que prevaleció con 5 (45,5 %). El retraso del vaciamiento gástrico fue la complicación quirúrgica que prevaleció, con 7 (46,7 %) enfermos, seguida de la fístula biliar con 3 (20,0 %). La fístula pancreática, la lesión de la vena mesentérica superior y la hemorragia posoperatoria se presentaron una sola vez (6,7 %), respectivamente. Estas 2 últimas, provocaron la muerte del enfermo en las primeras 48 horas del posoperatorio. Fallecieron 4 (26,7 %) pacientes de la serie. Conclusiones: Las complicaciones posquirúrgicas se observan principalmente a expensas del retardo del vaciamiento gástrico, la fístula biliar y pancreática. La mortalidad puede estar relacionada con la prolongación del tiempo quirúrgico igual o mayor de 5 horas, con el consiguiente aumento de las pérdidas hemáticas.

Introduction: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is an increasingly frequent operation in selected patients. Objective: To identify the morbidity and mortality related to conventional cephalic duodenopancreatectomy. Methods: An observational, descriptive study of a series of 15 cases operated on cephalic duodenopancreatectomy. The variables were investigated: staging according to the Tumor, Linphonod, Metastasis (TNM) classification, pathological diagnosis, complications, surgical time and discharge status. Absolute number and percentage were used as summary measures for the variables staging and diagnosis; mean, median and range for surgical time and confidence interval for discharge status. Results: The main pathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with 9 patients (60.1%) and of the duodenum with 2 (13.3%). Postoperative stage IIA was the one that prevailed with 5 (45.5%) patients. Delayed gastric emptying was the prevailing surgical complication, with 7 (46.7%) patients, followed by biliary fistula with 3 (20.0%). Pancreatic fistula, superior mesenteric vein injury, and postoperative hemorrhage occurred only once (6.7%), respectively. These last 2, caused the death of the patient in the first 48 hours of the postoperative period. Four (26.7%) patients in the series died. Conclusions: Postoperative complications are mainly observed at the expense of delayed gastric emptying and biliary and pancreatic fistula. Mortality may be related to the prolongation of surgical time equal to or greater than 5 hours with the consequent increase of blood loss.

Factores asociados a complicaciones después de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (cirugía de Whipple) en un centro especializado / Factors associated with postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (Whipple Procedure) in a specialized center

RESUMEN Introducción: La cirugía de Whipple, también conocida como duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC), es un procedimiento muy usado para varios tipos de cáncer peri ampular. Objetivos: Establecer los factores asociados a la evolución con complicaciones post DPC en el Servicio de Cirugía de Páncreas del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins en Lima, Perú. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, cuantitativo, analítico, transversal y retrospectivo en 81 pacientes durante el período comprendido entre enero de 2017 hasta diciembre de 2019, quienes fueron sometidos a una DPC. La variable dependiente fueron las complicaciones postquirúrgicas y las independientes fueron indicadores preoperatorios, perioperatorios y post operatorios. Se revisaron las historias clínicas. Se realizó regresión logística para hallar los OR crudos y ajustados. Resultados: La media de la edad fue 65,97±10,14 y el sexo más frecuente fue el masculino. La complicación más frecuente fue la fístula pancreática (34,6%). Los factores asociados a complicaciones post DPC fueron el sexo masculino (ORa: 4,46, IC95%: 1,35-14,77), ampuloma (ORa: 6,92, IC95%: 1,75-27,48) y la consistencia blanda del páncreas (ORa: 4,52, IC95%: 0,07-0,58). Conclusiones: Los factores asociados a complicaciones en la evolución post DPC fueron el sexo masculino, el ampuloma, y la consistencia blanda del páncreas.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Whipple procedure, also known as pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), is a widely used procedure for several types of peri-ampullary cancer. Objectives: To establish the factors associated with postoperative complications after PD in the Pancreas Surgery Service of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital in Lima, Peru. Methods: An observational, quantitative, analytical, cross-sectional, and retrospective study was carried out on 81 patients during the period from January 2017 to December 2019, who underwent PD. The dependent variable was postoperative complications and the independent variables were preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables. The medical records were reviewed. Logistic regression was performed to find the crude and adjusted ORs. Results: The mean age was 65.97±10.14 and the majority of patients were male. The most common postoperative complication was pancreatic fistula (34.6%). Factors associated with postoperative complications after PD were male sex (aOR: 4.46, 95% CI: 1.35-14.77), ampullary cancer (aOR: 6.92, 95% CI: 1.75-27.48), and soft consistency of the pancreas (aOR: 4.52, 95% CI: 0.07-0.58). Conclusions: The factors associated with postoperative complications after PD were male sex, ampulloma, and soft consistency of the pancreas.

Caracterización clinicoepidemiológica de pacientes operados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica con enfermedad del confluente biliopancreático / Clinical epidemiological characterization of patients operated on cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy with disease of the biliopancreatic confluent

Introducción: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica continúa siendo una intervención quirúrgica compleja. Objetivo: Caracterizar a los pacientes operados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica según variables epidemiológicas, clínicas e histológicas seleccionadas. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de una serie de 15 casos operados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en el Servicio de Cirugía General del Hospital Provincial Docente Saturnino Lora de Santiago de Cuba, durante el quinquenio 2016-2020. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, comorbilidades, hábitos tóxicos, síntomas y signos, así como tipo histológico de las lesiones. Resultados: Predominaron los pacientes del sexo masculino (80,0 %) y el grupo de 50 a 55 años de edad (40,0 %). Las comorbilidades más frecuentes fueron la hipertensión arterial en 80,0 % de la casuística, seguida de la diabetes mellitus en 53,3 %. Prevalecieron el tabaquismo (66,7 %) y el alcoholismo (60,0 %), así como los signos de obstrucción biliar (73,3 %). El diagnóstico histológico principal fue adenocarcinoma de páncreas en 60,1 % de los afectados. Conclusiones: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica se realiza predominantemente en pacientes con adenocarcinomas de páncreas y, en menor medida, con adenocarcinomas de duodeno y otras afecciones benignas; en afectados del sexo masculino, con edades intermedias y avanzadas de la vida, hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus, así como tiempo prolongado de ser fumadores y consumidores de alcohol. Los signos de obstrucción biliar son de importancia capital en el diagnóstico clínico.

Introduction: The cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy continues being a complex surgical intervention. Objective: To characterize patients operated on cephalic duodenopancreatectomy according to selected epidemiological, clinical and histologic variables. Methods: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study of a series of 15 cases operated on cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy was carried out in the General Surgery Service of Saturnino Lora Teaching Provincial Hospital in Santiago de Cuba, during the five year period 2016-2020. The analyzed variables were age, sex, comorbidities, toxic habits, symptoms and signs, as well as histologic type of the lesions. Results: There was a prevalence of the male sex patients (80.0 %) and the 50 to 55 age group (40.0 %). The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension in 80.0 % of the case material, followed by the diabetes mellitus in 53.3 %. Nicotine addiction (66.7 %) and alcoholism (60.0 %) prevailed, as well as the signs of biliary obstruction (73.3 %). The main histologic diagnosis was pancreas adenocarcinoma in 60.1 % of those affected. Conclusions: The cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy is carried out predominantly in patients with pancreas adenocarcinomas and, to a lesser extent, in patients with duodenum adenocarcinomas and other benign affections; in those affected of the male sex, with intermediate and advanced ages of life, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, as well as long time of being smokers and alcohol consumers. The signs of biliary obstruction are of capital importance in the clinical diagnosis.

Duodenopancreatectomía por adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas en ancianos. ¿Podemos asumirla con seguridad? / Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely?

Introducción: La cirugía y la quimioterapia han aumentado la supervivencia de los pacientes con neoplasias pancreáticas. La disminución de la morbimortalidad postoperatoria y el aumento de la esperanza de vida han ampliado las indicaciones de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC), aunque sigue siendo controvertida en la población geriátrica. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre una base de datos prospectiva, de pacientes con adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas sometidos a una DPC entre 2007-2018. El objetivo principal fue analizar la morbimortalidad y supervivencia asociada a la DPC en pacientes≥75 años (ancianos). Resultados: Se incluyeron 79 pacientes, 21 de ellos mayores de 75 años (27%); dentro de este grupo el 23,9% tenían más de 80 años. El ASA de ambos grupos fue similar. Los pacientes≥75años requirieron más transfusiones. No se observaron diferencias en el tiempo operatorio, aunque en los ancianos se realizaron más resecciones vasculares (26 vs. 8,7%; p=0,037).La morbilidad fue mayor en los ancianos (61,9 vs. 46,6%), aunque sin diferencias. Los≥75años presentaron más complicaciones no quirúrgicas (33,3%; p=0,050) siendo la neumonía la más frecuente. La mortalidad postoperatoria fue superior en los≥75años (9 vs. 0%; p=0,017), constituyendo la resección venosa un factor de riesgo (p=0,01). La supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad no mostraron diferencias significativas en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes ancianos presentaron una mayor mortalidad postoperatoria y más complicaciones no quirúrgicas. La supervivencia no mostró diferencias, por lo que, con una adecuada selección de pacientes, la edad no debe constituirse por sí misma como una contraindicación para la DPC(AU).

Introduction: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. Methods: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). Results: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC(AU).

Resección Duodenopancreática Cefálica: Patología, Complicaciones, Seguimiento (Parte II) / Cephalic Duodenopancreatic Resection: Pathology, Complications, Follow-up (Part II)

Antecedentes: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (D.P.C.) es el procedimiento quirúrgico aceptado para el tratamiento de los tumores malignos y benignos del confluente bilio-duodenopancreático. Lugar de aplicación: Hospital Nacional de Clínicas y Clínica privada. Diseño: Estudio protocolizado y prospectivo. Material y método: Entre diciembre 2000 y diciembre 2014 se operaron 96 DPC. Las indicaciones de la cirugía fueron: 39 cánceres de la cabeza de páncreas, 19 cánceres de papila, 9 cáncer de duodeno, 10 de colédoco distal, 5 tumores quísticos del páncreas, 4 pancreatitis crónica, 3 tumores funcionantes de páncreas, 3 tumores no funcionantes, finalmente 3 tumores de otra etiología. Resultados: Con respecto a la mortalidad dentro de los 30 días, fallecieron 5 pacientes (4, 80 %). Posteriormente, fallecieron dentro de los 90 días 5 pacientes más (9,3 %). En las complicaciones quirúrgicas, nosotros encontramos: la fistula pancreática hubo en 32 pacientes. Con respecto al Vaciamiento gástrico estuvo presente en 19 enfermos y finalmente en 5 pacientes tuvieron una hemorragia intra peritoneal que fueron re intervenidos y uno de los cuales falleció. Por otro lado, hubo 11 colecciones abdominales, donde se re operaron 4 pacientes y a los 7 restantes se les colocó un drenaje en dicha colección. Se re intervinieron 4 pacientes con evisceración, CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados de nuestro trabajo, apoyan el concepto que cirujanos con bajo volumen de D.P.C. anuales, pero con una estricta formación en Instituciones con infraestructura adecuada y un equipo multidisciplinario, pueden también obtener buenos resultados en las lesiones malignas y benignas del confluente bilio-duodeno-pancreático

Background: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP) (pancreaticoduodenectomy of the head of the pancreas) is the surgical option accepted as the procedure of choice for the management of both malignant and benignant tumours of the duodenal-pancreatic biliary confluence. Setting: National Clinical Hospital and private practice. Desing: Protocoled and prospective study. Methods: Between December 2000 through December 2014, 96 CDP have been operated upon: 39 cancers of the head of the pancreas, 19 cancers of the papilla, 9 cancers of the duodenum, 10 of the distal common bile ducts, 5 cystic tumours of the pancreas, 4 chronic pancreatitis, 3 functioning pancreas, 3 non-functioning tumours, and finally 3 tumours of different ethiologies: 1 GIST of duodenum, 1 metastasis from a renal cancer, and 1 colon cancer of the hepatic flexure who invaded the duodenum. Results: Pancreatic fistulas were observed in 32 patients. With reference to gastric emptying it was present in 19 patients, and finally in 5 patients an intra peritoneal haemorrhage was present which were re- intervened, and one of them died. On the other hand, 11 abdominal collections were present, of whom 4 patients were re-operated, and to the remaining 7 ,a drainage was placed in the collection. Four patients were re-operated with evisceration. Conclusions: The results of our study support the concept that surgeons with low volume of annual CDP, but with strict training in institutions with adequate infrastructure and a multidisciplinary team, can obtain also good results.

RESECCIÓN DE PANCREATODUODENECTOMÍA CEFÁLICA. TÉCNICA, MORBILIDAD Y MORTALIDAD (PARTE 1) / Cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy resection Technique, morbidity and mortality (Part 1)

Antecedentes: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (D.P.C.) es el procedimiento quirúrgico aceptado para el tratamiento de los tumores malignos y benignos del confluente bilio-duodenopancreático. Lugar de aplicación: hospital nacional de clínicas y clínica privada. Diseño: estudio protocolizado y prospectivo. Material y método: entre diciembre 2000 y diciembre 2014 se operaron 96 dpc. De ellos, 54 del sexo masculino y 42 del femenino, cuyas edades oscilaron entre 27 y 79 años de edad (media de 59 años). El promedio del período de tiempo entre el inicio de los síntomas y la primera consulta fue de 81 días (rango 10 a 129 días). A todos los pacientes se les llevo a cabo ecografía y tac de abdomen. Resultados: con respecto a la mortalidad dentro de los 30 días, fallecieron 5 pacientes (4, 80 %). Posteriormente, fallecieron dentro de los 90 días 5 pacientes más (9,3 %). Con respecto a la morbilidad, las dividimos en clínicas que fueron 17 pacientes (16,32 %) y 50 fueron quirúrgicas (48 %). Dentro de ellas la fistula pancreática estuvo en 32 pacientes (30,72 %). Con respecto al vaciamiento gástrico estuvo presente en 19 (18,24 %) y finalmente 5 (4,80 %) tuvieron una hemorragia intra peritoneal. Ocho pacientes tuvieron una fistula biliar (7,62 %). Conclusiones: los resultados de nuestro trabajo, apoyan el concepto que cirujanos con bajo volumen de d.P.C. Anuales, pero con una estricta formación en instituciones con infraestructura adecuada y un equipo multidisciplinario, pueden también obtener buenos resultados en las lesiones malignas y benignas del confluente bilio-duodeno-pancreático

Background: Cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy (CPD) is the surgical procedure of choice accepted for the management of both the malignant and the benign tumors of the bilio- duodeno pancreatic confluence. Setting: Clinico- National Hospital and private practice. Desing: protocoled and prospective study. Methods: between december 2000 and december 2014, 96 cpd have been operated. Of these, 54 were men and 42 were women, with ages ranged between 27 to 79 years (average 59 years). The time between the onset of symptoms and the first consultation period. Averaged 81 days (range 10-129 days). All the patients were submitted to ultrasound and ct of the abdomen. Results: with reference to mortality within 30 days, 5 patients (4, 80%) died. Subsequently, 5 more patients died within 90 days (9.3%). With reference to morbidity, we divided them in two, clinicals that were 17 patients (16.32%) And 50 were surgical (48%). Within pancreatic fistula included 32 patients (30, 72%). With reference to the gastric emptying, it was present in 19 (18.24%) And finally 5 (4.80%) Had intra peritoneal bleeding. In addition, 8 patients had a biliary fistula (7.62%). Conclusions: the results of our study support the concept that surgeons with low volume of cpd annually, but with strict training in institutions with adequate infraestructure and a multidisciplinary team, can also obtain good results in the malignant and benign lesions of the biliary-duodeno-pancreatic confluence.