Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.

Odontoid fractures constitute the most common cervical fractures in elderly. External immobilization is the treatment of choice for Type I and III; there is still no wide consensus about the best management of Type II fractures. Observational multicenter study was conducted on a prospectively built database on elderly patients (> 75 years) with Type II odontoid fracture managed conservatively during the last 10 years. All patients underwent CT scan on admission and at 3 months; if indicated, selected patient had CT scan at 6 and 12 months. All patients were clinically evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) on admission; NDI was assessed also at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months; furthermore, a quality of life (QoL) assessment with the SF-12 form was performed at 3 and 12 months. Among the 260 patients enrolled, 177 (68%) were women and 83 (32%) men, with a median age of 83 years. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months: 247 (95%) showed an excellent functional outcome within 6 weeks, among them 117 (45%) showed a good bony healing, whereas 130 (50%) healed in pseudo-arthrosis. The residual 5% were still variably symptomatic at 12 weeks; however, only 5 out of 13 (2% of the total cohort) required delayed surgery. This study showed that a conservative approach to odontoid Type II fracture in elderly is an effective and valid option, resulting in an excellent functional outcome (regardless of bony fusion) in the majority of cases. Failure of conservative treatment can be safely addressed with surgical fixation at a later stage.

Treatment of inferior pole fracture of the patella with tension-free external immobilization.

BACKGROUND: Inferior pole fracture of the patella (IPFP) has small and comminuted fracture blocks that are hard to immobilize, and early mobilization may lead to loss of fracture reduction and immobilization failure. Therefore, a difficulty of treatment is to achieve rigid immobilization with early functional exercise. Here, a new treatment method of tension-free external immobilization is put forward. METHODS: The clinical data of 11 IPFP patients treated with tension-free external immobilization from May 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were six males and five females aged 39.0 ± 12.8 years (range 18-53 years). IPFP was caused by traffic accidents in five cases and falls in six cases. All cases had unilateral closed injuries, including four in the left knee and seven in the right knee. The preoperative range of motion of the knee was 22.0 ± 7.5° (10-30°). The time from injury to operation was 4.5 ± 1.3 d (3-7 d). The operation-related indices were recorded, and the function of the affected knee was assessed by the Böstman score. RESULTS: All operations were successful. The operation time was 56.4 ± 8.4 mi (45-70 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 54.1 ± 14.6 mL (40-80 mL), and the length of hospital stay was 7.5 ± 1.9 d (5-11 d). The mean follow-up time was 20.4 ± 7.6 months (12-36 months), the duration of fracture healing was 8.9 ± 1.5 weeks (7-12 weeks), and the removal time of the external immobilization device was 10.4 ± 0.9 weeks (9-12 weeks). At the last follow-up, the range of motion had no significant difference between the affected knee (129.7 ± 3.3°, range 125-135°) and the unaffected knee (130.8 ± 3.8°, range 126-137°) (t = 0.718, p < 0.05). The Böstman score of the knee was 29.2 ± 1.0 points (27-30 points), including 10 excellent cases (90.9%) and one good case (9.1%). CONCLUSION: Tension-free external immobilization is a feasible treatment for IPFP. It can help with early functional exercise and achieve a satisfactory clinical effect.

Management of CVJ tuberculosis: the changing paradigm.

BACKGROUND: The literature seems fractured for the management of craniovertebral junction (CVJ)-tuberculosis (TB). Presently, non-surgical management has been in vogue for neurologically intact patients. On the contrary, severely disabled cases of CVJ-TB continue to attract discussion, tilted towards surgical intervention. We present our experience with the non-surgical management of CVJ-TB tailored to their neurological status. METHODS: Authors managed 37 cases (2004-2019; age 1-57 years, mean 36 years) of CVJ-TB, of which eighteen (18/37, 48.6%) were severely disabled (Nurick grade ≥ 3) with a mean follow-up of 84 months (48-192 months). Irrespective of the clinical status and radiological findings, all patients were managed on medical management only. Needle aspiration established pathology in 23 (62.2%) cases, while 9 (24.3%) cases required drainage of an abscess. All patients received 18 months of anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). In patients with Nurick grade ≥ 3 and documented AAD, we applied halo vest for 12 months to achieve cervical immobilization. Only hard cervical collar for 3 months was prescribed in patients with no documented AAD. RESULTS: All minimally disabled cases (Nurick grade ≤ 2, n = 19) responded favorably (n = 18) to ATT, except for an infant, who succumbed to irreversible hypoxic brain damage due to the obstructed aero-digestive gateway. Of the severely disabled cases (Nurick grade ≥ 3, n = 18), 16 cases had favorable outcomes with only external orthosis (12) and 18-month ATT. One patient succumbed to multiple cerebral infarcts, while one required realignment surgery at CVJ due to fusion in malaligned position. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that the disability grading of CVJ-TB is pertinent only for assessing the functional disability of patients at presentation, with minimal relevance in deciding its management strategy. Irrespective of neurological disability, almost all patients respond favorably to external immobilization and ATT.

Conservative versus Surgical Treatment for Odontoid Fracture: Is the Surgical Treatment Harmful? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Odontoid fracture is a common injury especially in elderly people. Despite some recent studies arguing in favor of surgery, the best treatment is still being debated. OBJECTIVE: We systematically review and analyze the comparative literature between surgical and conservative treatments of odontoid fractures. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies reported from January 1990 to May 2019 in English. Comparative studies evaluating the results of surgical and conservative treatments for odontoid fractures were eligible for inclusion. Combined relative risks (RRs) for mortality at last follow-up, union or nonunion rates, and complications were calculated. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Influence of age and year of publication on treatment effect was explored using a meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1438 articles were identified, of which 30 articles with 2463 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was a trend toward lower mortality in the surgical group (RR, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.02). Nonunion rates (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.6) were lower in the surgical group. Union rates were higher in the surgical group (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.45). No significant influence of age or year of publication on treatment effect was found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies, surgical treatment seems not to be inferior to conservative treatments. The conclusions of this study remain limited by the low quality of the evidence available. Randomized controlled studies are required.

Patient-reported outcome following nonsurgical management of type II odontoid process fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: Transverse (type II) odontoid process fracture is among the most commonly encountered cervical spine fractures. Nonsurgical management through external immobilization is occasionally preferred to surgical management but is criticized for its higher rates of failure and lower patient satisfaction. Our aim is to analyze patient-reported outcomes in patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for type II odontoid fractures. METHODS: We identified patients >18-year-old who underwent external immobilization as a treatment for isolated type II odontoid fracture between 2007 and 2012. We collected demographic parameters, clinical presentation, mode of injury, imaging studies and modality and duration of treatment (soft collar, halo-vest, or both). Patients were contacted by telephone to participate in a 15-min survey addressing their recovery including their subjective rate of return to preinjury level of functioning. RESULTS: Fifteen patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and participated in our survey. Patients were followed up for an average of 19 months after injury. Overall mean age was 61 years. Injury followed a mechanical fall or a road traffic accident in 11 and 4 cases, respectively. External immobilization was achieved by halo vest only in nine patients, soft collar only in two patients (13%), and through a sequential combination in the remaining 4 (27%). This was deployed for a mean of 7.8 months. Radiological studies at the last follow-up showed bony healing (27%), fibrous nonunion (60%), and persistent instability (13%). Patients reported gradual recovery of function throughout the 1st year after injury with levels above 70% of preinjury functioning achieved by 13% of patients at 6 months, 33% at 9 months, and 47% at 12 months. Overall satisfaction with nonsurgical management was 68%. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with type II odontoid fractures, external immobilization represents a good option with acceptable course of recovery.

External Immobilization of Odontoid Fractures: A Systematic Review to Compare the Halo and Hard Collar.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the halo and hard collar in the management of adult odontoid fractures. METHODS: Systematic and independent searches on MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Inclusion criteria included studies 1) with clinical outcomes, 2) in adults (18 years of age or order), 3) with odontoid fractures, 4) with patients immobilized using a halo or hard collar, and 5) in multiple (more than 5) patients. Treatment failure rates were calculated as the proportion requiring operative intervention. RESULTS: There were 714 cases included, who were managed in a halo (60%) or collar (40%). The mean age was 66 years (range, 18-96 years). Type 2 odontoid fractures were the most common (83%). There was no significant difference in failure rates between the halo and collar in patients with type 2 odontoid fractures (P = 0.111). This was also true in elderly (older than 65 years of age) patients (P = 0.802). The collar had a higher failure rate in type 3 odontoid fractures, though numbers were small (P = 0.035). Fibrous malunion occurred in 56 patients, and only 7% failed. There was only 1 case of neurological deterioration. Although mortality rates were similar between the collar and halo (P = 0.173), the halo was associated with a significantly higher complication rate (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For the most common clinical scenario, the halo and collar have similar failure rates, such that the higher morbidity associated with the halo may not be justified, especially in elderly patients. Malunion usually represents a stable clinical outcome, and surgery is rarely required. Prospective randomized studies are needed to more definitively compare the devices.

Afundamento costal estabilizado com suporte externo de metilmetacrilato em um felino / Ditching costal stabilized with external support of methylmethacrylate in a feline

O tórax instável ou afundamento costal acontece quando há fraturas múltiplas de pelo menos duas costelas consecutivas (CROWE et al., 2005). Nesse caso, durante a inspiração, o segmento fraturado, ao invés de expandir com o restante da caixa torácica, tende a penetrar no tórax. Subsequentemente, no momento da expiração, o conjunto instável tende a expansão (CROWE et al., 2005, FOSSUM, 2008). O tratamento inicial consiste em tornar o tórax estável, com uma pinça backhaus (AGUIAR, 2011). Posteriormente faz-se necessária a imobilização externa, que permitirá a adequada expansão torácica, sendo mantida por alguns dias até a estabilização do paciente. Para o tratamento cirúrgico recomenda-se a reconstrução anatômica das costelas fraturadas (CUNHA et al., 2009). O objetivo desse trabalho é demonstrar o tratamento da instabilidade costal com metilmetacrilato em felino, descrita por Coutinho et al. (2012).