Evaluation and post-transplant management of children after multi-organ-with-kidney transplantation.

Multi-organ transplantation involves the transplant of two or more organs from a single donor into a single recipient; in most cases, one of these organs is a kidney. Multi-organ transplantation is uncommon in pediatric transplantation but can be life-saving or significantly life-improving for children with rare diseases, including primary heart, liver, pancreas, or intestinal failure with secondary kidney failure, metabolic disorders, and genetic conditions causing multi-organ dysfunction. This manuscript reviews the current state of pediatric multi-organ transplantation that includes a kidney, with a focus on indications, evaluation, and key differences in management compared to kidney-alone transplantation. Guidelines and consensus statements for pediatric multi-organ transplantation are nonexistent; this review condenses reported statistics and peer-reviewed expert opinion while highlighting areas in need of further research.

Multi-Centre UK Analysis of Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney (SPK) Transplant in Recipients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

90% of the UK diabetic population are classified as T2DM. This study aims to compare outcomes after SPK transplant between recipients with T1DM or T2DM. Data on all UK SPK transplants from 2003-2019 were obtained from the NHSBT Registry (n = 2,236). Current SPK transplant selection criteria for T2DM requires insulin treatment and recipient BMI < 30 kg/m2. After exclusions (re-transplants/ambiguous type of diabetes) we had a cohort of n = 2,154. Graft (GS) and patient (PS) survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-regression models. Complications were compared using chi-squared analyses. 95.6% of SPK transplants were performed in recipients with T1DM (n = 2,060). Univariate analysis showed comparable outcomes for pancreas GS at 1 year (p = 0.120), 3 years (p = 0.237), and 10 years (p = 0.196) and kidney GS at 1 year (p = 0.438), 3 years (p = 0.548), and 10 years (p = 0.947). PS was comparable at 1 year (p = 0.886) and 3 years (p = 0.237) and at 10 years (p = 0.161). Multi-variate analysis showed comparable outcomes in pancreas GS (p = 0.564, HR 1.221, 95% CI 0.619, 2.406) and PS(p = 0.556, HR 1.280, 95% CI 0.563, 2.911). Comparable rates of common complications were demonstrated. This is the largest series outside of the US evaluating outcomes after SPK transplants and shows similar outcomes between T1DM and T2DM recipients. It is hoped dissemination of this data will lead to increased referral rates and assessment of T2DM patients who could benefit from SPK transplantation.

Chronic Pancreas Allograft Rejection Followed by Successful HLA-Incompatible Islet Alloautotransplantation: A Novel Strategy?

The purpose of pancreas or islet transplantation is to restore glycemic control in order to mitigate diabetes-related complications and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Complications from chronic pancreas allograft rejection may lead to transplantectomy, even when the endocrine function remains preserved. We present first evidence of a successful HLA incompatible islet re-transplantation with islets isolated from a rejecting pancreas allograft after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. The pancreas allograft was removed because of progressively painful pancreatic panniculitis from clinically uncontrolled chronic rejection. The endocrine function was preserved. Induction treatment for this "islet alloautotransplantation" consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIg and alemtuzumab. At 1 year, the patient retained islet graft function with good glycemic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia, despite persistent low-grade HLA donor-specific antibodies. His panniculitis had resolved completely. In our point of view, islet alloautotransplantation derived from a chronically rejecting pancreas allograft is a potential option to salvage (partial) islet function, despite preformed donor-specific antibodies, in order to maintain stable glycemic control. Thereby it protects against severe hypoglycemia, and it potentially mitigates kidney graft dysfunction and other diabetes-related complications in patients with continued need for immunosuppression and who are otherwise difficult to retransplant.

Randomized open-label crossover assessment of Prograf vs Advagraf on immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in simultaneous pancreas-kidney patients.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic impact of converting stable simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients from standard tacrolimus (Prograf) to long-acting tacrolimus (Advagraf). METHODS: In a randomized prospective crossover study, stable SPK recipients on Prograf were assigned to Prograf with 1:1 conversion to Advagraf or vice versa. Demographics, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid levels, and Cylex CD4 + ATP levels were taken at specified intervals in addition to standard blood work. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, who were a minimum of 1 year post-transplant, were entered into the study. No difference in tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid levels was noted between patients who were first assigned to Prograf or Advagraf. Additionally, Cylex levels as well as serum creatinine, lipase, and blood sugar levels were unchanged. There were no episodes of rejection during the 6-month study. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to convert between Prograf and Advagraf 1:1, without major impact on pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics in SPK recipients.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of late-onset BK virus nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and typically occurs within 1 year of transplant. Guidelines vary in recommendations for BKPyV screening beyond 1 year. A systematic characterization of risk factors and outcomes of late-onset (>1 year) BKPyVAN has not previously been reported. METHODS: We retrospectively compared characteristics and outcomes of early- (<1 year) and late-onset BKPyVAN (definitive [biopsy-confirmed] or presumptive [plasma BKPyV >10 000 copies/mL]) in a cohort of 671 KTR and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients between 2008 and 2013 at a single US transplant center. Proportions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: BKPyVAN was diagnosed in 96 (14.3%) patients (proven 16.7%, presumptive 83.3%): 79 (82.3%) early- and 17 (17.7%) late-onset. The proportion with late-onset BKPyVAN was significantly higher among SPK than KTR (4 of 7 [57.1%] vs 13 of 89 [14.6%], P = .017). Late-onset represented "de novo" infection (no BKPyV detection within the first year) in 14 (82.4%) and progression of earlier lower grade BKPyV reactivation in 3 (17.6%). Clinical outcomes were similar for early- and late-onset BKPyVAN (P > .05 all comparisons). In a pooled analysis of prior studies of BKPyVAN in SPK recipients, 62.9% (17 of 27) were late-onset. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of BKPyVAN is late-onset, especially among SPK recipients, and supports a longer duration of BKPyV monitoring for SPK recipients than recommended in some guidelines.

Fulminant endocarditis and disseminated infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a renal-pancreas transplant recipient.

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important cause of healthcare-associated infections, and is particularly problematic among patients who undergo organ transplantation. We describe a case of fulminant sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii harboring the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase gene and belonging to international clone II. This isolate led to the death of a patient 6 days after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Autopsy findings revealed acute mitral valve endocarditis, myocarditis, splenic and renal emboli, peritonitis, and pneumonia. This case highlights the severe nature of certain A. baumannii infections and the vulnerability of transplanted patients to the increasingly intractable "high-risk" clones of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Surgical site infections after simultaneous pancreas kidney and pancreas transplantation in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Among hospital-acquired infections, surgical site infections (SSIs) are frequent. SSI in the early post-transplant course poses a relevant threat to transplant recipients. AIM: To determine incidence, risk factors for SSI and its association with post-transplant outcomes and pancreas transplant (P-Tx) recipients. METHODS: Adult simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPK-T) and P-Tx recipients with a follow-up of at least 90 days were identified in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) dataset. Except for the categorization of SSIs according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, all other data were prospectively collected. Risk factors for SSI were investigated with logistic regression. A Weibull accelerated failure-time model was applied to address the impact of SSI on length of stay, correcting for transplant-related complications and delayed graft function. FINDINGS: Of 130 transplant recipients, 108 SPK-Tx and 22 P-Tx, 18 (14%) individuals developed SSI within the first 90 days after transplantation. Deep incisional (seven, 38.9%) and organ/space infections (eight, 44.4%) predominated. In the majority of SSIs (11, 61.1%; two SSIs with simultaneous identification of fungal pathogens) bacteria were detected with Enterococcus spp. being most frequent. The median duration of hospitalization after transplantation was significantly longer in recipients with SSI (median: 26 days; interquartile range (IQR): 19-44) than in patients without SSI (median: 17 days; IQR: 12-25; P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, SSI was significantly associated with increased length of stay and prolonged the duration of hospitalization by 36% (95% confidence interval: 4-79). CONCLUSION: SSI after SPK-Tx and P-Tx occurred at a frequency of 14%. Among pathogens, Enterococcus spp. predominated. SSI was independently associated with a longer hospitalization after transplantation.

Perioperative Outcomes Following Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation in Alberta, Canada: Research Letter.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPK) has benefits for patients with kidney failure and type I diabetes mellitus, but is associated with greater perioperative risk compared with kidney-alone transplantation. Postoperative care settings for SPK recipients vary across Canada and may have implications for patient outcomes and hospital resource use. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes following SPK transplantation between patients receiving postoperative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with the ward. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using administrative health data. SETTING: In Alberta, the 2 transplant centers (Calgary and Edmonton) have different protocols for routine postoperative care of SPK recipients. In Edmonton, SPK recipients are routinely transferred to the ICU, whereas in Calgary, SPK recipients are transferred to the ward. PATIENTS: 129 adult SPK recipients (2002-2019). MEASUREMENTS: Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD) were used to identify SPK recipients (procedure codes) and the outcomes of inpatient mortality, length of initial hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of 16 different patient safety indicators (PSIs). METHODS: We followed SPK recipients from the admission date of their transplant hospitalization until the first of hospital discharge or death. Unadjusted quantile regression was used to determine differences in LOS, and age- and sex-adjusted marginal probabilities were used to determine differences in PSIs between centers. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths and no major differences in the demographic characteristics between the centers. The majority of the SPK transplants were performed in Edmonton (n = 82, 64%). All SPK recipients in Edmonton were admitted to the ICU postoperatively, compared with only 11% in Calgary. There was no statistically significant difference in the LOS or probability of a PSI between the 2 centers (LOS for Edmonton vs Calgary:16 vs 13 days, P = .12; PSIs for Edmonton vs Calgary: 60%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.71 vs 44%, 95% CI = 0.29-0.59, P = .08). LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted using administrative data and is limited by variable availability. The small sample size limited precision of estimated differences between type of postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: Following SPK transplantation, we found no difference in inpatient outcomes for recipients who received routine postoperative ICU care compared with ward care. Further research using larger data sets and interventional study designs is needed to better understand the implications of postoperative care settings on patient outcomes and health care resource utilization.

CONTEXTE: La double transplantation rein-pancréas (DTRP) présente des bienfaits pour les patients atteints à la fois d'insuffisance rénale et de diabète de type I, mais elle est associée à un plus grand risque de complications périopératoires que la transplantation rénale seule. Les paramètres de soins postopératoires pour les patients ayant subi une DTRP varient à travers le Canada et peuvent avoir des répercussions sur l'évolution de l'état de santé des patients et sur l'utilisation des ressources hospitalières. OBJECTIFS: Comparer les résultats des patients recevant des soins postopératoires, soit à l'unité de soins intensifs (USI), soit à l'étage, après une double transplantation rein-pancréas. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte réalisée à partir des données administratives de santé. CADRE: Les deux centres de transplantation de l'Alberta (Calgary et Edmonton) disposent de protocoles différents en ce qui concerne les soins postopératoires courants prodigués aux receveurs d'une DTRP. À Edmonton, ces patients sont systématiquement transférés à l'USI; tandis qu'à Calgary, ils sont transférés à l'étage. SUJETS: L'étude porte sur 129 adultes ayant reçu une DTRP (2002-2019). MESURES: Les données de la Base de données sur les congés des patients de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé (ICIS-BDCP) ont été utilisées pour recenser les receveurs d'une DTRP (codes d'intervention) et colliger les résultats quant à la mortalité en cours d'hospitalisation, la durée du séjour initial (DSI) et l'occurrence de 16 différents indicateurs de sécurité des patients (ISP). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons suivi les receveurs d'une DTRP de la date de leur admission pour la greffe jusqu'au jour de leur premier congé de l'hôpital ou jusqu'à leur décès. Les différences entre les deux centres en ce qui concerne le DSI ont été établies à l'aide d'une régression par quantile non corrigée, et par probabilités marginales ajustées en fonction de l'âge et du sexe pour les ISP. RÉSULTATS: Aucun décès periopératoire n'est survenu et aucune différence majeure n'a été observée entre les centres quant aux caractéristiques démographiques. La majorité des interventions ont été effectuées à Edmonton (n = 82; 64 %). Tous les receveurs d'une DTRP à Edmonton ont été admis à l'USI après la chirurgie, contre seulement 11 % à Calgary. Aucune différence statistiquement significative n'a été observée quant à la durée du séjour (DSI à Edmonton par rapport à Calgary : 16 jours c. 13 jours, p = 0,12) ou à la probabilité d'un ISP (ISP à Edmonton : 60 %; IC 95 % : 0,50-0,71 contre ISP à Calgary : 44 %; IC 95 % : 0,29-0,59, p = 0,08) entre les deux centres. LIMITES: L'étude a été réalisée à partir des données administratives et est limitée par la disponibilité des variables. La faible taille de l'échantillon limite la précision des différences estimées entre les types de soins postopératoires. CONCLUSION: Après une double transplantation rein-pancréas, nous n'avons observé aucune différence entre les résultats des patients ayant reçu les soins postopératoires courants à l'USI et ceux des patients les ayant reçus à l'étage. Des études interventionnelles utilisant de plus grands ensembles de données sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre l'incidence des soins postopératoires sur les résultats des patients et sur l'utilisation des ressources en santé.

Impact of Early Pancreatic Graft Loss on Outcome after Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation (SPKT)-A Landmark Analysis.

(1) Background: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a standard therapeutic option for patients with diabetes mellitus type I and kidney failure. Early pancreas allograft failure is a complication potentially associated with worse outcomes. (2) Methods: We performed a landmark analysis to assess the impact of early pancreas graft loss within 3 months on mortality and kidney graft survival over 10 years. This retrospective single-center study included 114 adult patients who underwent an SPKT between 2005 and 2018. (3) Results: Pancreas graft survival rate was 85.1% at 3 months. The main causes of early pancreas graft loss were thrombosis (6.1%), necrosis (2.6%), and pancreatitis (2.6%). Early pancreas graft loss was not associated with reduced patient survival (p = 0.168) or major adverse cerebral or cardiovascular events over 10 years (p = 0.741) compared to patients with functioning pancreas, after 3 months. Moreover, kidney graft function (p = 0.494) and survival (p = 0.461) were not significantly influenced by early pancreas graft loss. (4) Conclusion: In this study, using the landmark analysis technique, early pancreas graft loss within 3 months did not significantly impact patient or kidney graft survival over 10 years.

Cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease candidates for kidney-pancreas transplantation: Trends from 1999 to 2017.

AIMS: To evaluate the changes in cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were candidates for kidney-pancreas transplantation (KPTx) from 1999 to 2017. METHODS: Patients with T1D referred for KPTx evaluation were included. The cohort was divided into five groups according to the year of evaluation (1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2017). The control of CVRFs and the prevalence of prior CVD were evaluated. RESULTS: We evaluated 360 patients (64.4% men, age 38.9 ± 7.1 years). LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dl increased from 22.7% to 76.9% (1999-2002 vs. 2015-2017; p < 0.001), as did the use of statins (from 24.7% to 74.5%; p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased from 138.8 ± 27.6 to 125.1 ± 27.9 mmHg (p = 0.001) and current smokers from 48% to 25% (p = 0.018). Intensive insulin treatment increased from 34.4% to 93.6% (p < 0.001). Diabetes duration before the initiation of renal replacement therapy increased from 23 ± 5.5 to 26.9 ± 8.9 years (p = 0.001). Overall, 30.3% had previous CVD, without significant changes over time (p = 0.699), albeit patients were older and had longer diabetes duration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1D and ESRD referred for KPTx have better control of CVRFs over time, which might lead to a decrease in cardiovascular events.

Pancreas transplantation: The Wake Forest experience in the new millennium.

AIM: To investigate the Wake Forest experience with pancreas transplantation in the new millennium with attention to surgical techniques and immunosuppression. METHODS: A monocentric, retrospective review of outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) and solitary pancreas transplant (SPT) recipients was performed. All patients underwent pancreas transplantation as intent-to-treat with portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage and received depleting antibody induction; maintenance therapy included tapered steroids or early steroid elimination with mycophenolate and tacrolimus. Recipient selection was based on clinical judgment whether or not the patient exhibited measureable levels of C-peptide. RESULTS: Over an 11.25 year period, 202 pancreas transplants were performed in 192 patients including 162 SKPTs and 40 SPTs. A total of 186 (92%) were primary and 16 (8%) pancreas retransplants; portal-enteric drainage was performed in 179 cases. A total of 39 pancreas transplants were performed in African American (AA) patients; of the 162 SKPTs, 30 were performed in patients with pretransplant C-peptide levels > 2.0 ng/mL. In addition, from 2005-2008, 46 SKPT patients were enrolled in a prospective study of single dose alemtuzumab vs 3-5 doses of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction therapy. With a mean follow-up of 5.7 in SKPT vs 7.7 years in SPT recipients, overall patient (86% SKPT vs 87% SPT) and kidney (74% SKPT vs 80% SPT) graft survival rates as well as insulin-free rates (both 65%) were similar (P = NS). Although mortality rates were nearly identical in SKPT compared to SPT recipients, patterns and timing of death were different as no early mortality occurred in SPT recipients whereas the rates of mortality following SKPT were 4%, 9% and 12%, at 1-, 3- and 5-years follow-up, respectively (P < 0.05). The primary cause of graft loss in SKPT recipients was death with a functioning graft whereas the major cause of graft loss following SPT was acute and chronic rejection. The overall incidence of acute rejection was 29% in SKPT and 27.5% in SPT recipients (P = NS). Lower rates of acute rejection and major infection were evidenced in SKPT patients receiving alemtuzumab induction therapy. Comparable kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were observed in AA and non-AA recipients despite a higher prevalence of a "type 2 diabetes" phenotype in AA. Results comparable to those achieved in insulinopenic diabetics were found in the transplantation of type 2 diabetics with detectable C-peptide levels. CONCLUSION: In the new millennium, acceptable medium-term outcomes can be achieved in SKPT and SPTs as nearly 2/3rds of patients are insulin independent following pancreas transplantation.