Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor.

BACKGROUND: Essential tremor (ET) affects numerous adults, impacting quality of life (QOL) and often defying pharmacological treatment. Surgical interventions like deep brain stimulation (DBS) and lesional approaches, including radiofrequency, gamma-knife radiosurgery, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound, offer solutions but are not devoid of limitations. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective, single-center, single-blinded pilot study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of unilateral MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRIg-LITT) thalamotomy for medically intractable ET. METHODS: Nine patients with ET, unresponsive to medications and unsuitable for DBS, underwent unilateral MRIg-LITT thalamotomy. We assessed tremor severity, QOL, cognitive function, and adverse events (AE) over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Tremor severity significantly improved, with a reduction of 83.37% at 12 months post-procedure. QOL scores improved by 74.60% at 12 months. Reported AEs predominantly included transient dysarthria, proprioceptive disturbances, and gait balance issues, which largely resolved within a month. At 3 months, 2 patients (22%) exhibited contralateral hemiparesis requiring physiotherapy, with 1 patient (11%) exhibiting persistent hemiparesis at 12 months. No significant cognitive impairment was detected post-procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral MRIg-LITT thalamotomy yielded substantial and enduring tremor alleviation and enhanced QOL in patients with ET that is resistant to medication. The AE profile was acceptable. Our findings support the need for additional research with expanded patient cohorts and extended follow-up to corroborate these outcomes and to refine the role of MRIg-LITT as a targeted and minimally invasive approach for ET management. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

National 22-year epilepsy surgery landscape shows increasing open and minimally invasive pediatric epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVES: A surgical "treatment gap" in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts. METHODS: In our retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for -DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight-adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight-adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight-adjusted chi-square test results. RESULTS: These data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22-year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non-significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed. SIGNIFICANCE: An increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical "treatment gap."

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for deep-seated perivascular brain tumors is not associated with distal ischemia.

PURPOSE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive cytoreductive treatment option for brain tumors with a risk of vascular injury from catheter placement or thermal energy. This may be of concern with deep-seated tumors that have surrounding end-artery perforators and critical microvasculature. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of distal ischemia following LITT for deep-seated perivascular brain tumors. METHODS: A retrospective review of a multi-institution database was used to identify patients who underwent LITT between 2013 and 2022 for tumors located within the insula, thalamus, basal ganglia, and anterior perforated substance. Demographic, clinical and volumetric tumor characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was radiographic evidence of distal ischemia on post-ablation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: 61 LITT ablations for deep-seated perivascular brain tumors were performed. Of the tumors treated, 24 (39%) were low-grade gliomas, 32 (52%) were high-grade gliomas, and 5 (8%) were metastatic. The principal location included 31 (51%) insular, 14 (23%) thalamic, 13 (21%) basal ganglia, and 3 (5%) anterior perforated substance tumors. The average tumor size was 19.6 cm3 with a mean ablation volume of 11.1 cm3. The median extent of ablation was 92% (IQR 30%, 100%). Two patients developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after LITT. No patient had radiographic evidence of distal ischemia on post-operative diffusion weighted imaging. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that LITT for deep-seated perivascular brain tumors has minimal ischemic risks and is a feasible cytoreductive treatment option for otherwise difficult to access intracranial tumors.

Spinal laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiotherapy for thoracic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

PURPOSE: Spinal laser interstitial thermal therapy (sLITT) is a less invasive alternative to surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Here, we analyze outcomes of patients treated with sLITT either in conjunction with radiotherapy or as a standalone salvage therapy. METHODS: We included patients with thoracic vertebral metastatic cord compression treated with sLITT. Outcomes included freedom from local failure (FFLF) and overall survival (OS). Factors associated with FFLF were identified with univariable and multivariable analyses via a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Between 2013-2022, 129 patients received sLITT to 144 vertebral segments; 69% were radiotherapy naïve, 81% were radioresistant histologies, and 74% were centered in the vertebral body. Median age was 61 years. Pre-sLITT Bilsky score was 3 in 28%, 2 in 33%, and 1c in 37%. Radiotherapy was delivered in conjunction with sLITT for 80% of cases, including 68% that received stereotactic radiotherapy, at a median of 5 days after sLITT. Median follow-up was 9.1 months. One-year FFLF and OS was 80% and 78%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, variables independently associated with adverse FFLF included paraspinal/foraminal disease location (p = 0.001), and post-sLITT imaging Bilsky score of 2 (p = 0.073) or 3 (p = 0.011). Prior radiotherapy, technique of radiotherapy, and time between radiotherapy and sLITT were not associated with FFLF. CONCLUSION: sLITT with radiotherapy is an effective minimally invasive treatment approach for thoracic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Early treatment response may serve as a prognostic imaging biomarker.

Comparative analysis of bevacizumab and LITT for treating radiation necrosis in previously radiated CNS neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a local inflammatory reaction that arises in response to radiation injury and may cause significant morbidity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating RN in patients with previously radiated central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened. Studies of patients with radiation necrosis from primary or secondary brain tumors were included. Indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling was performed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included with 210 patients in the bevacizumab group and 337 patients in the LITT group. Bevacizumab demonstrated symptomatic improvement/stability in 87.7% of cases, radiological improvement/stability in 86.2%, and steroid wean-off in 45%. LITT exhibited symptomatic improvement/stability in 71.2%, radiological improvement/stability in 64.7%, and steroid wean-off in 62.4%. Comparative analysis revealed statistically significant differences favoring bevacizumab in symptomatic improvement/stability (p = 0.02), while no significant differences were observed in radiological improvement/stability (p = 0.27) or steroid wean-off (p = 0.90). The rates of adverse reactions were 11.2% for bevacizumab and 14.9% for LITT (p = 0.66), with the majority being grade 2 or lower (72.2% for bevacizumab and 62.5% for LITT). CONCLUSION: Both bevacizumab and LITT exhibited favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in managing RN. Bevacizumab was found to be associated with better symptomatic control compared to LITT. Patient-, diagnosis- and lesion-related factors should be considered when choosing the ideal treatment modality for RN to enhance overall patient outcomes.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation stereotactic radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.

Strategies to Improve Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier for Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glioblastoma remains resistant to most conventional treatments. Despite scientific advances in the past three decades, there has been a dearth of effective new treatments. New approaches to drug delivery and clinical trial design are needed. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss how the blood-brain barrier and tumor microenvironment pose challenges for development of effective therapies for glioblastoma. Next, we discuss treatments in development that aim to overcome these barriers, including novel drug designs such as nanoparticles and antibody-drug conjugates, novel methods of drug delivery, including convection-enhanced and intra-arterial delivery, and novel methods to enhance drug penetration, such as blood-brain barrier disruption by focused ultrasound and laser interstitial thermal therapy. Lastly, we address future opportunities, positing combination therapy as the best strategy for effective treatment, neoadjuvant and window-of-opportunity approaches to simultaneously enhance therapeutic effectiveness with interrogation of on-treatment biologic endpoints, and adaptive platform and basket trials as imperative for future trial design. New approaches to GBM treatment should account for the blood-brain barrier and immunosuppression by improving drug delivery, combining treatments, and integrating novel clinical trial designs.

Negative MRI and a seizure onset zone close to eloquent areas in FCD type II: Application of MRg-LiTT after a SEEG re-evaluation in pediatric patients with a previous failed surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Negative MRI and an epileptogenic zone (EZ) adjacent to eloquent areas are two main issues that can be encountered during pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Focal Cortical Dysplasia type II (FCD type II) is the most common aetiology underlying a negative MRI. The objective of this study is to present three cases of pediatric patients exhibiting negative MRI and a seizure onset zone close to eloquent areas, who previously underwent traditional open surgery or SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulations (RF-TC). After seizure seizure recrudescence, pre-surgical SEEG was re-evaluated and Magnetic Resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRg-LiTT) was performed. We discuss the SEEG patterns, the planning of laser probes trajectories and the outcomes one year after the procedure. METHODS: Pediatric patients who underwent SEEG followed by MRg-LiTT for drug-resistant epilepsy associated with FCD type II at our Centre were included. Pre-surgical videoEEG (vEEG), stereoEEG (sEEG), and MRI were reviewed. Post-procedure clinical outcome (measured by Engel score) and complications rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Three patients underwent 3 MRg-LiTT procedures from January 2022 to June 2022. Epileptogenic zone was previously studied via SEEG in all the patients. All the three patients pre-surgical MRI was deemed negative. Mean age at seizure onset was 47 months (21-96 months), mean age at MRg-LiTT was 12 years (10 years 10 months - 12 years 9 months). Engel class Ia outcome was achieved in patients #2 and #3, Engel class Ib in patient #1. Mean follow-up length was of 17 months (13 months - 20 months). Complications occurred in one patient (patient #2, extradural hematoma). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of SEEG and MRg-LiTT in complex cases can lead to good outcomes both as a rescue therapy after failed surgery, but also as an alternative to open surgery after a successful SEEG-guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation (RF-TC). Specific SEEG patterns and a previous good outcome from RF-TC can be predictors of a favourable outcome.

Accounting for repeat intervention costs in the economic comparison of laser interstitial thermal therapy and anterior temporal lobectomy for treatment of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an alternative to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy that has been found by some to have a lower procedure cost but is generally regarded as less effective and sometimes results in a subsequent procedure. The goal of this study is to incorporate subsequent procedures into the cost and outcome comparison between ATL and LITT. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study includes 85 patients undergoing ATL or LITT for temporal lobe epilepsy during the period September 2015 to December 2022. Of the 40 patients undergoing LITT, 35 % (N = 14) underwent a subsequent ATL. An economic cost model is derived, and difference in means tests are used to compare the costs, outcomes, and other hospitalization measures. RESULTS: Our model predicts that whenever the percentage of LITT patients undergoing subsequent ATL (35% in our sample) exceeds the percentage by which the LITT procedure alone is less costly than ATL (7.2% using total patient charges), LITT will have higher average patient cost than ATL, and this is indeed the case in our sample. After accounting for subsequent surgeries, the average patient charge in the LITT sample ($103,700) was significantly higher than for the ATL sample ($88,548). A second statistical comparison derived from our model adjusts for the difference in effectiveness by calculating the cost per seizure-free patient outcome, which is $108,226 for ATL, $304,052 for LITT only, and $196,484 for LITT after accounting for the subsequent ATL surgeries. SIGNIFICANCE: After accounting for the costs of subsequent procedures, we found in our cohort that LITT is not only less effective but also results in higher average costs per patient than ATL as a first course of treatment. While cost and effectiveness rates will vary across centers, we also provide a model for calculating cost effectiveness based on individual center data.

Comparison of minimally invasive to standard temporal lobectomy approaches to epilepsy surgery: Seizure relief and visual confrontation naming outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to systematically examine three different surgical approaches in treating left medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) (viz., subtemporal selective amygdalohippocampectomy [subSAH], stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy [SLAH], and anterior temporal lobectomy [ATL]), to determine which procedures are most favorable in terms of visual confrontation naming and seizure relief outcome. This was a retrospective study of 33 adults with intractable mTLE who underwent left temporal lobe surgery at three different epilepsy surgery centers who also underwent pre-, and at least 6-month post-surgical neuropsychological testing. Measures included the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale. Fisher's exact tests revealed a statistically significant decline in naming in ATLs compared to SLAHs, but no other significant group differences. 82% of ATL and 36% of subSAH patients showed a significant naming decline whereas no SLAH patient (0%) had a significant naming decline. Significant postoperative naming improvement was seen in 36% of SLAH patients in contrast to 9% improvement in subSAH patients and 0% improvement in ATLs. Finally, there were no statistically significant differences between surgical approaches with regard to seizure freedom outcome, although there was a trend towards better seizure relief outcome among the ATL patients. Results support a possible benefit of SLAH in preserving visual confrontation naming after left TLE surgery. While result interpretation is limited by the small sample size, findings suggest outcome is likely to differ by surgical approach, and that further research on cognitive and seizure freedom outcomes is needed to inform patients and providers of potential risks and benefits with each.

Multimodal Approach for the Treatment of Complex Hypothalamic Hamartomas.

Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are rare congenital lesions formed by heterotopic neuronal and glial cells attached to the mammillary bodies, tuber cinereum, and hypothalamus.They often present with an intractable epilepsy typically characterized by gelastic seizures but commonly associated with other types of refractory seizures. The clinical course is progressive in most of the cases, starting with gelastic seizures in infancy and deteriorating into complex seizure disorders that result in catastrophic epilepsy associated with cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances.Hamartomas are known to be intrinsically epileptogenic and the site of origin for the gelastic seizures. As antiepileptic drugs are typically ineffective in controlling HH-related epilepsy, different surgical options have been proposed as a treatment to achieve seizure control. Resection or complete disconnection of the hamartoma from the mammillothalamic tract has proved to achieve a long-lasting control of the epileptic syndrome.Usually, symptoms and their severity are typically related to the size, localization, and type of attachment. Precocious puberty appears mostly in the pedunculated type, while epileptic syndrome and behavioral decline are frequently related to the sessile type. For this reason, different classifications of HHs have been developed based on their size, extension, and type of attachment to the hypothalamus.The bigger and more complex hypothalamic hamartomas typically present with severe refractory epilepsy, behavioral disturbances, and progressive cognitive decline posing a formidable challenge for the control of these symptoms.We present here our experience with the multimodal treatment for complex hypothalamic hamartomas. After an in-depth review of the literature, we systematize our approach for the different types of hypothalamic hamartomas.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for pediatric low-grade glioma-case presentations and lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of brain tumors has developed over time, offering customized strategies for patients and their specific lesions. One of the most recent advances in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery is laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). However, its effectiveness and indications are still being evaluated. The aim of this work is to review the current literature on LITT for pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) and evaluate our initial results in this context. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our pediatric neurosurgery database for patients who received LITT treatment between November 2019 and December 2023. We collected data on the indications for LITT, technical issues during the procedure, and clinical and radiological follow-up. RESULTS: Three patients underwent 5 LITT procedures for pLGG. The lesion was thalamo-peduncular in one patient, cingulate in one, and deep parietal in one patient. Two patients had a previous open resection done and were diagnosed with pLGG. One patient underwent a stereotaxic biopsy during the LITT procedure that was non-diagnostic. The same patient underwent a later open resection of the tumor in the cingulate gyrus. There were no surgical complications and all patients were discharged home on the first post-operative day. The follow-up period was between 20 and 40 months. Radiological follow-up showed a progressive reduction of the tumor in patients with LGG. CONCLUSION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy is a minimally invasive treatment that shows promise in treating deep-seated pLGG in children. The treatment has demonstrated a reduction in tumor volume, and the positive results continue over time. LITT can be used as an alternative treatment for tumors located in areas that are difficult to access surgically or in cases where other standard treatment options have failed.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent glioblastomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating recurrent glioblastomas (rGBMs). A comprehensive search was conducted in four databases to identify studies published between January 2001 and June 2022 that reported prognosis information of rGBM patients treated with LITT as the primary therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 months after LITT intervention. Adverse events and complications were also evaluated. Eight eligible non-comparative studies comprising 128 patients were included in the analysis. Seven studies involving 120 patients provided data for the analysis of PFS. The pooled PFS rate at 6 months after LITT was 25% (95% CI 15-37%, I2 = 53%), and at 12 months, it was 9% (95% CI 4-15%, I2 = 24%). OS analysis was performed on 54 patients from six studies, with an OS rate of 92% (95% CI 84-100%, I2 = 0%) at 6 months and 42% (95% CI 13-73%, I2 = 67%) at 12 months after LITT. LITT demonstrates a favorable safety profile with low complication rates and promising tumor control and overall survival rates in patients with rGBMs. Tumor volume and performance status are important factors that may influence the effectiveness of LITT in selected patients. Additionally, the combination of LITT with immune-based therapy holds promise. Further well-designed clinical trials are needed to expand the application of LITT in glioma treatment.

MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in the treatment of brain tumors and epilepsy.

MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique increasingly used for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy and brain tumors. Utilizing near-infrared light energy delivery guided by real-time MRI thermometry, MRgLITT enables precise ablation of targeted brain tissues, resulting in limited corridor-related morbidity and expedited postoperative recovery. Since receiving CE marking in 2018, the adoption of MRgLITT has expanded to more than 40 neurosurgical centers across Europe. In epilepsy treatment, MRgLITT can be applied to various types of focal lesional epilepsy, including mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, hypothalamic hamartoma, focal cortical dysplasias, periventricular heterotopias, cavernous malformations, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNET), low-grade gliomas, tuberous sclerosis, and in disconnective surgeries. In neuro-oncology, MRgLITT is used for treating newly diagnosed and recurrent primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and radiation necrosis. This comprehensive review presents an overview of the current evidence and technical considerations for the use of MRgLITT in treating various pathologies associated with drug-resistant epilepsy and brain tumors.

An Overview of MR-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRg-LITT) in Disrupting the Blood-Brain Barrier: Efficacy and Duration.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a selectively semi-permeable layer, crucial in shielding the brain from external pathogens and toxic substances while maintaining ionic homeostasis and sufficient nutrient supply. However, it poses a significant challenge for drugs to penetrate the BBB in order to effectively target brain tumors. Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRg-LITT) is a minimally invasive technique that employs thermal energy to cauterize intracranial lesions with the potential to temporarily disrupt the BBB. This further opens a possible therapeutic window to enhance patient outcomes. Here, we review the impact of MRg-LITT on BBB and blood tumor barrier (BTB) and the duration of the BBB disruption. Studies have shown that MRg-LITT is effective due to its minimally invasive nature, precise tumor targeting, and low complication rates. Although the disruption duration varies across studies, the average peak disruption is within the initial two weeks post-ablation period and subsequently exhibits a gradual decline. However, further research involving larger groups with extended follow-up periods is required to determine disruption duration more accurately. In addition, evaluating toxicity and glymphatic system disruption is crucial to circumvent potential risks associated with this procedure.

Improved MR temperature imaging at 0.5 T using view-sharing accelerated multiecho thermometry for MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy.

The aim of the current study was to improve temperature-monitoring precision using multiecho proton resonance frequency shift-based thermometry with view-sharing acceleration for MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) on a 0.5-T low-field MR system. Both precision and speed of the temperature measurement for clinical MRgLITT treatments suffer at low field, due to reduced image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), decreased temperature-induced phase changes, and limited RF receiver channels. In this work, a bipolar multiecho gradient-recalled echo sequence with a temperature-to-noise ratio optimal weighted echo combination is applied to improve the temperature precision. A view-sharing-based approach is utilized to accelerate signal acquisitions while preserving image SNRs. The method was evaluated using ex vivo (pork and pig brain) LITT heating experiments and in vivo (human brain) nonheating experiments on a high-performance 0.5-T scanner. In terms of results, (1) after echo combination, multiecho thermometry (i.e., ~7.5-40.5 ms, 7 TEs) provides ~1.5-1.9 times higher temperature precision than the no echo combination case (i.e., TE7 = 40.5 ms) within the same readout bandwidth. Additionally, echo registration is necessary for the bipolar multiecho sequence; (2) for a threefold acceleration, the view-sharing approach with variable-density subsampling shows around 1.8 times lower temperature errors than the GRAPPA method. Particularly for view-sharing, variable-density subsampling performs better than Interleave subsampling; and (3) ex vivo heating and in vivo nonheating experiments demonstrated that the temperature accuracy was less than 0.5 ° C and that the temperature precision was less than 0.6 ° C using the proposed 0.5-T thermometry. It was concluded that view-sharing accelerated multiecho thermometry is a practical temperature measurement approach for MRgLITT at 0.5 T.

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation of the epileptogenic zone as a treatment and predictor of future success of further surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used as a treatment for drug-resistant localization-related epilepsy. The aim of this study is to analyze the successes and failures using RFA and how response correlates with surgical epilepsy treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent RFA via SEEG electrodes. After excluding five, the remaining 57 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Forty patients (70%) underwent a secondary surgical procedure, of whom 32 were delayed: 26 laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), five resection, one neuromodulation. We determined the predictive value of RFA outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the transient time of seizure freedom after RFA were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Twelve of 49 patients (24.5%) who had RFA alone and delayed follow-up achieved Engel class I. Of the 32 patients who underwent a delayed secondary surgical procedure, 15 achieved Engel class I and nine Engel class II (24 successes), and eight were considered failures (Engel class III/IV). The transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was significantly longer in the success group (4 months, SD = 2.6) as compared to the failure group (.75 months, SD = 1.16; p < .001). Additionally, there was a higher portion of preoperative lesional findings in patients in the RFA alone and delayed surgical success group (p = .03) and a longer time to seizure recurrence in the presence of lesions (p < .05). Side effects occurred in 1% of patients. SIGNIFICANCE: In this series, RFA provided a treatment during SEEG-guided intracranial monitoring that led to seizure freedom in ~25% of patients. Of the 70% who underwent delayed surgery, longer transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was predictive of the results of the secondary surgeries, 74% of which were LITT.

Seizure outcome of pediatric magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus open surgery: A matched noninferiority cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has been proposed as an alternative to open epilepsy surgery, to address concerns regarding the risk of open surgery. Our primary hypothesis was that seizure freedom at 1 year after MRgLITT is noninferior to open surgery in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The secondary hypothesis was that MRgLITT has fewer complications and shorter hospitalization than surgery. The primary objective was to compare seizure outcome of MRgLITT to open surgery in children with DRE. The secondary objective was to compare complications and length of hospitalization of the two treatments. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included children with DRE treated with MRgLITT or open surgery with 1-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were corpus callosotomy, neurostimulation, multilobar or hemispheric surgery, and lesion with maximal dimension > 60 mm. MRgLITT patients were propensity matched to open surgery patients. The primary outcome was seizure freedom at 1 year posttreatment. The difference in seizure freedom was compared using noninferiority test, with noninferiority margin of -10%. The secondary outcomes were complications and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five MRgLITT patients were matched to 185 open surgery patients. Seizure freedom at 1 year follow-up was observed in 89 of 185 (48.1%) MRgLITT and 114 of 185 (61.6%) open surgery patients (difference = -13.5%, one-sided 97.5% confidence interval = -23.8% to ∞, pNoninferiority  = .79). The lower confidence interval boundary of -23.8% was below the prespecified noninferiority margin of -10%. Overall complications were lower in MRgLITT compared to open surgery (10.8% vs. 29.2%, respectively, p < .001). Hospitalization was shorter for MRgLITT than open surgery (3.1 ± 2.9 vs. 7.2 ± 6.1 days, p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Seizure outcome of MRgLITT at 1 year posttreatment was inferior to open surgery. However, MRgLITT has the advantage of better safety profile and shorter hospitalization. The findings will help counsel children and parents on the benefits and risks of MRgLITT and contribute to informed decision-making on treatment options.

A cost analysis of MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for adult refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is used increasingly for refractory epilepsy. The goal of this investigation is to directly compare cost and short-term adverse outcomes for adult refractory epilepsy treated with temporal lobectomy and LITT, as well as to identify risk factors for increased costs and adverse outcomes. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients who received LITT between 2012 and 2019. Patients with adult refractory epilepsy were identified. Multivariable mixed-effects models were used to analyze predictors of cost, length of stay (LOS), and complications. RESULTS: LITT was associated with reduced LOS and overall cost relative to temporal lobectomy, with a statistical trend toward lower incidence of postoperative complications. High-volume surgical epilepsy centers had lower LOS overall. Longer LOS was a significant driver of increased cost for LITT, and higher comorbidity was associated with non-routine discharge. SIGNIFICANCE: LITT is an affordable alternative to temporal lobectomy for adult refractory epilepsy with an insignificant reduction in inpatient complications. Patients may benefit from expanded access to this treatment modality for both its reduced LOS and lower cost.

Seizure onset patterns predict outcome after stereo-electroencephalography-guided laser amygdalohippocampotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is an appealing option for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, who often require intracranial monitoring to confirm mesial temporal seizure onset. However, given limited spatial sampling, it is possible that stereotactic electroencephalography (stereo-EEG) may miss seizure onset elsewhere. We hypothesized that stereo-EEG seizure onset patterns (SOPs) may differentiate between primary onset and secondary spread and predict postoperative seizure control. In this study, we characterized the 2-year outcomes of patients who underwent single-fiber SLAH after stereo-EEG and evaluated whether stereo-EEG SOPs predict postoperative seizure freedom. METHODS: This retrospective five-center study included patients with or without mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) who underwent stereo-EEG followed by single-fiber SLAH between August 2014 and January 2022. Patients with causative hippocampal lesions apart from MTS or for whom the SLAH was considered palliative were excluded. An SOP catalogue was developed based on literature review. The dominant pattern for each patient was used for survival analysis. The primary outcome was 2-year Engel I classification or recurrent seizures before then, stratified by SOP category. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, with a mean follow-up duration of 39 ± 12 months after SLAH. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year Engel I seizure freedom probability was 54%, 36%, and 33%, respectively. Patients with SOPs, including low-voltage fast activity or low-frequency repetitive spiking, had a 46% 2-year seizure freedom probability, compared to 0% for patients with alpha or theta frequency repetitive spiking or theta or delta frequency rhythmic slowing (log-rank test, p = .00015). SIGNIFICANCE: Patients who underwent SLAH after stereo-EEG had a low probability of seizure freedom at 2 years, but SOPs successfully predicted seizure recurrence in a subset of patients. This study provides proof of concept that SOPs distinguish between hippocampal seizure onset and spread and supports using SOPs to improve selection of SLAH candidates.