Predictive value of pre-infusion tumor growth rate for the occurrence and severity of CRS and ICANS in lymphoma under CAR T-cell therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) can be administered outpatient yet requires management of potential side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The pre-infusion tumor burden is associated with CRS, yet there is no data on the relevance of pre-infusion tumor growth rate (TGR). Our objective was to investigate TGR for the occurrence and severity of CRS and ICANS. Consecutive patients with available pre-baseline and baseline (BL) imaging before CART were included. TGR was determined as both absolute (abs) and percentage change (%) of Lugano criteria-based tumor burden in relation to days between exams. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT consensus criteria. Clinical metadata was collected including the international prognostic index (IPI), patient age, ECOG performance status, and LDH. Sixty-two patients were included (median age: 62 years, 40% female). The median pre-BL TGR [abs] and pre-BL TGR [%] was 7.5 mm2/d and 30.9%/d. Pre-BL TGR [abs] and pre-BL TGR [%] displayed a very weak positive correlation with the grade of CRS (r[abs] = 0.14 and r[%] = 0.13) and no correlation with ICANS (r[abs] = - 0.06 and r[%] = - 0.07). There was a weak positive correlation between grade of CRS and grade of ICANS (r = 0.35; p = 0.005) whereas there was no significant correlation of CRS or ICANS to any other of the examined parameters. The pre-infusion TGR before CART was weakly associated with the occurrence of CRS, but not the severity, whereas there were no significant differences in the prediction of ICANS. There was no added information when compared to pre-infusion tumor burden alone. Outpatient planning and toxicity management should not be influenced by the pre-infusion TGR.

Prognostic value of pre-infusion tumor growth rate for patients with lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma, yet its efficacy is affected by the tumor burden. The relevance of tumor kinetics before infusion is unknown. We aimed to study the prognostic value of the pre-infusion tumor growth rate (TGRpre-BL) for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Consecutive patients with available pre-baseline (pre-BL) and baseline (BL) computed tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan before CART were included. TGR was determined as change of Lugano criteria-based tumor burden between pre-BL, BL and follow-up examinations (FU) in relation to days between imaging exams. Overall response rate (ORR), depth or response (DoR) and PFS were determined based on Lugano criteria. Multivariate regression analysis studied association of TGR with ORR and DoR. Proportional Cox regression analysis studied association of TGR with PFS and OS. RESULTS: In total, 62 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median TGRpre-BL was 7.5 mm2/d (interquartile range -14.6 mm2/d to 48.7 mm2/d); TGRpre-BL was positive (TGRpre-BL POS) in 58% of patients and negative (TGRpre-BL NEG, indicating tumor shrinkage) in 42% of patients. Patients who were TGRpre-BL POS had a 90-day (FU2) ORR of 62%, a DoR of -86% and a median PFS of 124 days. Patients who were TGRpre-BL NEG had a 90-day ORR of 44%, DoR of -47% and a median PFS of 105 days. ORR and DoR were not associated with slower TGR (P = 0.751, P = 0.198). Patients with an increase of TGR from pre-BL over BL to 30-day FU (FU1) ≥100% (TGRpre-BL-to-FU1≥100%) showed a significant association with shorter median PFS (31 days versus 343 days, P = 0.002) and shorter median OS after CART (93 days versus not reached, P < 0.001), compared with patients with TGRpre-BL-to-FU1<100%. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of CART, differences in pre-infusion tumor kinetics showed minor differences in ORR, DoR, PFS and OS, whereas the change of the TGR from pre-BL to 30-day FU significantly stratified PFS and OS. In this patient population of refractory or relapsed lymphomas, TGR is readily available based on pre-BL imaging, and its change throughout CART should be explored as a potential novel imaging biomarker of early response.

Imaging for Oncologic Response Assessment in Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to examine the role of different imaging biomarkers, focusing in particular on the use of updated CT and PET response criteria for the assessment of oncologic treatment effectiveness in patients with lymphoma but also discussing other potential functional imaging methods and their limitations. CONCLUSION: Lymph nodes are commonly involved by metastatic solid tumors as well as by lymphoma. Evolving changes in cancer therapy for lymphoma and metastases have led to improved clinical outcomes. Imaging is a recognized surrogate endpoint that uses established criteria based on changes in tumor bulk to monitor the effects of treatment. With the introduction of targeted therapies and novel antiangiogenic drugs, the oncologic expectations from imaging assessment are changing to move beyond simple morphologic methods. Molecular and functional imaging methods (e.g., PET, perfusion, DWI, and dual-energy CT) are therefore being investigated as imaging biomarkers of response and prognosis. The role of these advanced imaging biomarkers extends beyond measuring tumor burden and therefore might offer insight into early predictors of therapeutic response. Despite the potential benefits of these exciting imaging biomarkers, several challenges currently exist.

Staging of lymphoma under chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: reasons for discordance among imaging response criteria.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma. Discrepancies among different response criteria for lymphoma under CART were recently shown. Our objective was to evaluate reasons for discordance among different response criteria and their relation to overall survival. METHODS: Consecutive patients with baseline and follow-up imaging at 30 (FU1) and 90 days (FU2) after CART were included. Overall response was determined based on Lugano, Cheson, response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL) and lymphoma response to immunomodulatory therapy criteria (LYRIC). Overall response rate (ORR) and rates of progressive disease (PD) were determined. For each criterion reasons for PD were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: 41 patients were included. ORR was 68%, 68%, 63%, and 68% at FU2 by Lugano, Cheson, RECIL, and LYRIC, respectively. PD rates differed among criteria with 32% by Lugano, 27% by Cheson, 17% by RECIL, and 17% by LYRIC. Dominant reasons for PD according to Lugano were target lesion (TL) progression (84.6%), new appearing lesions (NL; 53.8%), non-TL progression (27.3%), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD; 15.4%). Deviations among the criteria for defining PD were largely explained by PMD of preexisting lesions that are defined as PD only by Lugano and non-TL progression, which is not defined as PD by RECIL and in some cases classified as indeterminate response by LYRIC. CONCLUSIONS: Following CART, lymphoma response criteria show differences in imaging endpoints, especially in defining PD. The response criteria must be considered when interpreting imaging endpoints and outcomes from clinical trials.

Lymphoma tumor burden before chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell treatment: RECIL vs. Lugano vs. metabolic tumor assessment.

Purpose: High tumor burden has emerged as a negative predictor of efficacy in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) in patients with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma. This study analyzed the deviation among imaging-based tumor burden (TB) metrics and their association with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Materials and methods: In this single-center observational study, we included all consecutively treated patients receiving CD19 CART with available baseline PET-CT imaging. Imaging-based TB was determined based on response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL), the Lugano criteria, and metabolic tumor volume. Total, nodal and extranodal TB were represented, according to the respective criteria, by sum of longest diameters (TBRECIL), sum of product of perpendicular diameters (TBLugano), and metabolic tumor volume (TBMTV). Correlation statistics were used for comparison. Proportional Cox regression analysis studied the association of TB metrics with PFS and OS. Results: 34 consecutive patients were included (median age: 67 years, 41% female) with total median baseline TBRECIL of 12.5 cm, TBLugano of 4,030 mm2 and TBMTV of 330 mL. The correlation of TBRECIL and TBLugano with TBMTV was strong (ρ=0.744, p<0.001 and ρ=0.741, p<0.001), with lowest correlation for extranodal TBRECIL with TBMTV (ρ=0.660, p<0.001). Stratification of PFS was strongest by total TBMTV>50% (HR=2.915, p=0.042), whereas total TBRECIL>50% and total TBLugano>50% were not significant (both p>0.05). None of the total TB metrics were associated with OS (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Pre-CART TB metrics vary significantly based on the assessment method, impacting their association with survival outcomes. The correlation between TBRECIL, TBLugano and TBMTV was influenced by disease phenotype and prior bridging therapy. TB method of assessment must be considered when interpreting the impact of TB on outcomes in clinical trials. Considering the heterogeneity, our results argue for standardization and harmonization across centers.

Comparison of 18F FDG PET-CT AND CECT in pretreatment staging of adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

We compared 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in 62 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), aiming to provide evidences that may spare CECT from the staging procedures of HL patients. Among a total of 1448 nodal sites examined, disease involvement was detected in 232 (16%) and 280 (19.3%) nodal areas by CECT and PET-CT, respectively (P < 0.01). Sensitivity of CECT in detecting disease involvement ranged from 0% for internal mammary region (7 cases) and Waldayer's ring (1 case) to 100% for mediastinum. A total of 248 extranodal areas were examined. CECT and PET-CT identified disease involvement in 19 (7.7%) and 25 (10.1%) extranodal areas, respectively (P = n.s). Compared to PET-CT, CECT detected a lower number of cases with bone and/or bone marrow involvement (P = 0.05), whereas no differences were detected at the level of lung. By contrast, CECT identified liver lesions in four patients versus three identified by PET-CT. In comparison to CECT, PET-CT upstaged 6 patients (9.7%) and downstaged 1 patient (1.6%). We showed that PET-CT modified treatment strategy in five (8.1%) cases not only as a result of stage advancement (2 cases) but also of a different prognostic stratification in patients with localized disease (3 cases), due to the better sensitivity in detecting nodal involvement. In conclusion, our data, confirm the superiority of PET-CT in detecting disease involvement at diagnosis of HL, and further supports the possibility to replace CECT with PET-CT in the initial staging of HL.

Interobserver Agreement of Interim and End-of-Treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Impact on Clinical Practice and Trials.

We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of interim PET (I-PET) and end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) using the Deauville score (DS) in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: I-PET and EoT-PET scans of DLBCL patients were performed in the HOVON84 study (2007-2012), an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients received R-CHOP14 and were randomized to receive rituximab intensification in the first 4 cycles or not. I-PET was performed after 4 cycles (for observational purposes), and EoT-PET after 6 or 8 cycles. Two independent central reviewers retrospectively scored all scans according to the DS system, masked to clinical outcomes. Results were dichotomized as negative (DS of 1-3) or positive (DS of 4-5). Besides percentage overall agreement (OA), we calculated agreement for positive and negative scores, expressed as positive agreement (PA) and negative agreement (NA), respectively. Results: 465 I-PET and 457 EoT-PET scans were centrally reviewed; baseline 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT was available in 75%-77%, and CT in the remaining cases. Percentage OA for I-PET and EoT-PET were 87.7% and 91.7% (P = 0.049), with NA of 92.0% and 95.0% (P = 0.091), and PA of 73.7% and 76.3% (P = 0.656), respectively. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement using DS in DLBCL patients in I-PET and EoT-PET yields high OA and NA. The lower PA suggests that EoT-PET/CT treatment evaluation in daily practice and I-PET-adapted trials may benefit from dual reads and central review, respectively.

Lugano 2014 criteria for assessing FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma: an operational approach for clinical trials.

An operationalized workflow paradigm is presented and validated with pilot subject data. This approach is reproducible with a high concordance rate between individual readers (kappa 0.73 [confidence interval 0.59-0.87; P=<0.0001]) using a 5-point scale to assess [18F] labeled fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic activity in lymphomatous lesions. These results suggest an operationally practical 5-point scale workflow paradigm for potential use in larger clinical trials evaluating lymphoma therapeutics.