The Second Life of Methylarginines as Cardiovascular Targets.

Endogenous methylarginines were proposed as cardiovascular risk factors more than two decades ago, however, so far, this knowledge has not led to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. The initial studies were primarily focused on the endogenous inhibitors of nitric oxide synthases asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and monomethylarginine (MMA) and the main enzyme regulating their clearance dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 (DDAH1). To date, all the screens for DDAH1 activators performed with the purified recombinant DDAH1 enzyme have not yielded any promising hits, which is probably the main reason why interest towards this research field has started to fade. The relative contribution of the second DDAH isoenzyme DDAH2 towards ADMA and MMA clearance is still a matter of controversy. ADMA, MMA and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are also metabolized by alanine: glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 (AGXT2), however, in addition to methylarginines, this enzyme also has several cardiovascular protective substrates, so the net effect of possible therapeutic targeting of AGXT2 is currently unclear. Recent studies on regulation and functions of the enzymes metabolizing methylarginines have given a second life to this research direction. Our review discusses the latest discoveries and controversies in the field and proposes novel directions for targeting methylarginines in clinical settings.

The first human normative ranges and biomarker performance of dimethylguanidino valeric acid isoforms in fatty liver disease.

We have recently determined dimethylguanidino valeric acid (DMGV) to be a novel biomarker of liver injury in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and an independent predictor of incident diabetes over a decade in advance. DMGV consists of two stereo-isomers, asymmetric dimethylguanidino valeric acid (ADGV) and symmetric dimethylguanidino valeric acid (SDGV). Here we report, for the first time, the upper limits of normal of both isomers in humans at the accepted 5.56% liver fat threshold for NAFLD, determined using in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We performed independent and blinded comparative analyses of ADGV and SDGV levels using two different liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods in (A) our laboratory, and (B) the New South Wales Chemical Pathology state laboratory, using unique columns, LC-MS/MS equipment, extraction protocols and normalisation approaches. Despite these differences, each laboratory reported consistent absolute concentrations across a range of liver fat percentages. We next determined the diagnostic performance of SDGV compared to ADGV in a cohort of 268 individuals with liver fat measurements. In derivation-validation analyses we determined rule-in/rule-out thresholds and the concentration of SDGV that provides optimal performance across sensitivity and specificity for the identification of NAFLD. In conclusion, we have herein determined for the first time the true human plasma reference range of both isoforms of an emerging novel biomarker of NAFLD, at the accepted upper normal threshold of liver fat. We have also identified that SDGV is the isoform with the best diagnostic performance and determined the optimal cut-point for its detection of NAFLD.