O-GlcNAcylation regulation of RIPK1-dependent apoptosis dictates sensitivity to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.

Receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) has emerged as a key regulatory molecule that influences the balance between cell death and cell survival. Under external stress, RIPK1 determines whether a cell undergoes RIPK-dependent apoptosis (RDA) or survives by activating NF-κB signaling. However, the role and mechanisms of RIPK1 on sunitinib sensitivity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain elusive. In this study, we demonstrated that the O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine modification (O-GlcNAcylation) of RIPK1 induces sunitinib resistance in RCC by inhibiting RDA. O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) specifically interacts with RIPK1 through its tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) domain and facilitates RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation. The O-GlcNAcylation of RIPK1 at Ser331, Ser440 and Ser669 regulates RIPK1 ubiquitination and the formation of the RIPK1/FADD/Caspase-8 complex, thereby inhibiting sunitinib-induced RDA in RCC. Site-specific depletion of O-GlcNAcylation on RIPK1 affects the formation of the RIPK1/FADD/Caspase 8 complex, leading to increased sunitinib sensitivity in RCC. Our data highlight the significance of aberrant RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation in the development of sunitinib resistance and indicate that targeting RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation could be a promising therapeutic strategy for RCC.

Molecular and functional characterization of reversible-sunitinib-tolerance state in human renal cell carcinoma.

Therapy failure with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib remains a great challenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Growing evidence indicates that the tumour subpopulation can enter a transient, non-mutagenic drug-tolerant state to endure the treatment underlying the minimal residual disease and tumour relapse. Drug tolerance to sunitinib remains largely unexplored in RCC. Here, we show that sunitinib-tolerant 786-O/S and Caki-2/S cells are induced by prolonged drug treatment showing reduced drug sensitivity, enhanced clonogenicity, and DNA synthesis. Sunitinib-tolerance developed via dynamic processes, including (i) engagement of c-MET and AXL pathways, (ii) alteration of stress-induced p38 kinase and pro-survival BCL-2 signalling, (iii) extensive actin remodelling, which was correlated with activation of focal adhesion proteins. Remarkably, the acute drug response in both sensitive and sunitinib-tolerant cell lines led to dramatic fine-tuning of the actin-cytoskeleton and boosted cellular migration and invasion, indicating that the drug-response might depend on cell state transition rather than pre-existing mutations. The drug-tolerant state was transiently acquired, as the cells resumed initial drug sensitivity after >10 passages under drug withdrawal, reinforcing the concept of dynamic regulation and phenotypic heterogeneity. Our study described molecular events contributing to the reversible switch into sunitinib-tolerance, providing possible novel therapeutic opportunities in RCC.

Sunitinib-mediated inhibition of STAT3 in skeletal muscle and spinal cord does not affect the disease in a mouse model of ALS.

Variability in disease onset and progression is a hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), both in sporadic and genetic forms. Recently, we found that SOD1-G93A transgenic mice expressing the same amount of mutant SOD1 but with different genetic backgrounds, C57BL/6JOlaHsd and 129S2/SvHsd, show slow and rapid muscle wasting and disease progression, respectively. Here, we investigated the different molecular mechanisms underlying muscle atrophy. Although both strains showed similar denervation-induced degradation of muscle proteins, only the rapidly progressing mice exhibited early and sustained STAT3 activation that preceded atrophy in gastrocnemius muscle. We therefore investigated the therapeutic potential of sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor known to inhibit STAT3 and prevent cancer-induced muscle wasting. Although sunitinib treatment reduced STAT3 activation in the gastrocnemius muscle and lumbar spinal cord, it did not preserve spinal motor neurons, improve neuromuscular impairment, muscle atrophy and disease progression in the rapidly progressing SOD1-G93A mice. Thus, the effect of sunitinib is not equally positive in different diseases associated with muscle wasting. Moreover, given the complex role of STAT3 in the peripheral and central compartments of the neuromuscular system, the present study suggests that its broad inhibition may lead to opposing effects, ultimately preventing a potential positive therapeutic action in ALS.

Toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: RENOTORCH, a randomized, open-label, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard treatments for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase III RENOTORCH study compared the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for the first-line treatment of patients with intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with intermediate-/poor-risk unresectable or metastatic RCC were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive toripalimab (240 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) plus axitinib (5 mg orally twice daily) or sunitinib [50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle) or 2 weeks (3-week cycle)]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were randomized to receive toripalimab plus axitinib (n = 210) or sunitinib (n = 211). With a median follow-up of 14.6 months, toripalimab plus axitinib significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 35% compared with sunitinib as assessed by an IRC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.86; P = 0.0028]. The median PFS was 18.0 months in the toripalimab-axitinib group, whereas it was 9.8 months in the sunitinib group. The IRC-assessed ORR was significantly higher in the toripalimab-axitinib group compared with the sunitinib group (56.7% versus 30.8%; P < 0.0001). An OS trend favoring toripalimab plus axitinib was also observed (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92). Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 61.5% of patients in the toripalimab-axitinib group and 58.6% of patients in the sunitinib group. CONCLUSION: In patients with previously untreated intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC, toripalimab plus axitinib provided significantly longer PFS and higher ORR than sunitinib and had a manageable safety profile TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04394975.

Oral delivery of Sunitinib malate using carboxymethyl cellulose/poly(acrylic acid-itaconic acid)/Cloisite 30B nanocomposite hydrogel as a pH-responsive carrier.

This work aimed to fabricate a Cloisite 30B-incorporated carboxymethyl cellulose graft copolymer of acrylic acid and itaconic acid hydrogel (Hyd) via a free radical polymerization method for controlled release of Sunitinib malate anticancer drug. The synthesized samples were characterized by FTIR, XRD, TEM, and SEM-dot mapping analyses. The encapsulation efficiency of Hyd and Hyd/Cloisite 30B (6 wt%) was 81 and 93%, respectively, showing the effectiveness of Cloisite 30B in drug loading. An in vitro drug release study showed that drug release from all samples in a buffer solution with pH 7.4 was higher than in a buffer solution with pH 5.5. During 240 min, the cumulative drug release from Hyd/Cloisite 30B (94.97% at pH 7.4) is lower than Hyd (53.71% at pH 7.4). Also, drug-loaded Hyd/Cloisite 30B (6 wt%) demonstrated better antibacterial activity towards S. Aureus bacteria and E. Coli. High anticancer activity of Hyd/Cloisite 30B against MCF-7 human breast cancer cells was shown by the MTT assay, with a MCF-7 cell viability of 23.82 ± 1.23% after 72-hour incubation. Our results suggest that Hyd/Cloisite 30B could be used as a pH-controlled carrier to deliver anticancer Sunitinib malate.

Nesprin1 Deficiency Is Associated with Poor Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Resistance to Sunitinib Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Nuclear envelope spectrin repeat protein (Nesprin) 1 encoded by SYNE1, crucially regulates the morphology and functions of the cell. Mutations in the SYNE1 gene are associated with various diseases; however, their significance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. In this study, we have investigated the association of SYNE1/Nesprin1 with the progression and prognosis of clear cell RCC (ccRCC). METHODS: In silico analyses of publicly available datasets of patients with RCC were performed. Based on the cohort data, Nesprin1 expression in nephrectomized tissue samples acquired from patients with ccRCC was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining. The invasion, migration, and proliferation of the SYNE1-knockdown human RCC cell lines were analyzed in vitro; moreover, RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis were conducted to study the molecular mechanism underlying the association of SYNE1/Nesprin1 with prognosis of RCC. RESULTS: Patients with RCC-associated SYNE1 gene mutations exhibited significantly worse overall and progression-free survivals. Patients with Nesprin1-negative ccRCC tumors exhibit significantly poorer overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates than those recorded in the Nesprin1-positive group. SYNE1 knockdown enhanced the invasion and migration of RCC cells; however, it did not influence the proliferation of cells. RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis revealed that SYNE1 knockdown significantly altered the expression of genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation. Consistently, patients with RCC exhibiting low SYNE1 expression, who were treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor sunitinib, had worse progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the expression of SYNE1/Nesprin1 and SYNE1 mutations in patients with RCC are closely linked to their prognosis and responsiveness to sunitinib treatment.

Oleuropein attenuates the nephrotoxic effect of sunitinib in rats: Unraveling the potential role of SIRT6/Notch-1/NLRP-3/IL-1ß axis.

Sunitinib (SUN) is a chemotherapeutic agent clinically approved for treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma. Despite its remarkable benefits, various renal toxicities have been reported that limit its clinical uses. Oleuropein (OLE) is the main polyphenolic constituent of olive tree and mediates the majority of its valuable pharmacological activities. The current study examined the probable renoprotective effects of OLE against SUN-induced nephrotoxicity. Adult male albino rats were co-treated by SUN (25 mg/kg, 3 times/week, PO) with either a drug vehicle or OLE (60 mg/kg/day, daily, PO) for four weeks. A control group comprising of age-matched rats was used. Four weeks later, blood specimens were collected to assess kidney functions. Kidneys were harvested for biochemical and histopathological analyses. Administration of SUN induced kidney dysfunction, along with marked rises in endothelin-1 (ET-1) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) levels in renal tissues. Histological abnormalities were also detected in kidneys of SUN-treated rats including glomerular and tubular interstitial congestion along with interstitial fibrosis. On molecular levels, there was a decline in renal SIRT6 expression along with significant up-regulation of Notch-1, NLRP-3, interleukin -1ß (IL-1ß) and cleaved caspsase-3. All these changes were almost alleviated by OLE co-treatment. These findings suggest the implication of SIRT6/Notch-1/NLRP3/IL-1ß axis in the pathogenesis of SUN-induced nephrotoxicity and highlight OLE as a prospective renoprotective agent during SUN chemotherapy to halt its renal toxicity likely through promotion of SIRT6 and suppression of Notch-1/NLRP3/IL-1ß signaling pathway.

CD276 enhances sunitinib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by promoting DNA damage repair and activation of FAK-MAPK signaling pathway.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of CD276 expression on the sunitinib sensitivity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell and animal models and the potential mechanisms involved. METHODS: CD276 expression levels of ccRCC and normal samples were analyzed via online databases and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). CD276 was knocked down in ccRCC cell models (sunitinib-resistant 786-O/R cells and sunitinib-sensitive 786-O cells) using shRNA transfection, and the cells were exposed to a sunitinib (2 µM) environment. Cells proliferation was then analyzed using MTT assay and colony formation experiment. Alkaline comet assay, immunofluorescent staining, and western blot experiments were conducted to assess the DNA damage repair ability of the cells. Western blot was also used to observe the activation of FAK-MAPK pathway within the cells. Finally, a nude mouse xenograft model was established and the nude mice were orally administered sunitinib (40 mg/kg/d) to evaluate the in vivo effects of CD276 knockdown on the therapeutic efficacy of sunitinib against ccRCC. RESULTS: CD276 was significantly upregulated in both ccRCC clinical tissue samples and cell models. In vitro experiments showed that knocking down CD276 reduced the survival rate, IC50 value, and colony-forming ability of ccRCC cells. Knocking down CD276 increased the comet tail moment (TM) values and γH2AX foci number, and reduced BRCA1 and RAD51 protein levels. Knocking down CD276 also decreased the levels of p-FAK, p-MEK, and p-ERK proteins. CONCLUSION: Knocking down CD276 effectively improved the sensitivity of ccRCC cell and animal models to sunitinib treatment.

Effect of isavuconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a newly developed multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has become a common therapeutic option for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Examining the mechanism underlying the interaction between sunitinib and isavuconazole was the aim of this effort. METHODS: The concentrations of sunitinib and its primary metabolite, N-desethyl sunitinib, were analyzed and quantified using ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Our study evaluated the potential interaction between isavuconazole and sunitinib using rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM), and in vivo rat models. For the in vivo study, two groups (n = 5) of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly allocated to receive sunitinib either with or without co-administration of isavuconazole. Additionally, the effects of isavuconazole on the metabolic stability of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib were studied in RLM in vitro. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that in RLM, isavuconazole exhibited a mixed non-competitive and competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) value of 1.33 µM. Meanwhile, in HLM, isavuconazole demonstrated a competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 of 5.30 µM. In vivo studies showed that the presence of isavuconazole significantly increased the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sunitinib, with the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and Tmax rising to approximately 211.38%, 203.92%, and 288.89%, respectively, in contrast to the control group (5 mg/kg sunitinib alone). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in the presence of isavuconazole remained largely unchanged compared to the control group. Furthermore, in vitro metabolic stability experiments revealed that isavuconazole inhibited the metabolic processing of both sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole had a major impact on sunitinib metabolism, providing fundamental information for the precise therapeutic administration of sunitinib.

Interaction between Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway and EMT pathway mediates the mechanism of sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Targeted drugs are the main methods of RCC treatment. However, drug resistance is common in RCC patients, in-depth study of the drug-resistant mechanism is essential. METHODS: We constructed sunitinib resistant and Twist overexpressed A498 cells, and studied its mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: In cell research, we found that either sunitinib resistance or Twist overexpression can activate Wnt/ß-catenin and EMT signaling pathway, and the sunitinib resistance may work through ß-catenin/TWIST/TCF4 trimer. In zebrafish research, we confirmed the similarity of Twist overexpression and sunitinib resistance, and the promoting effect of Twist overexpression on drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib resistance and Twist overexpression can activate Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway and EMT to promote the growth and metastasis of RCC cells.

Adrenomedullin/FOXO3 enhances sunitinib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting FDX1 expression and cuproptosis.

Cuproptosis, a new type of copper-induced cell death, is involved in the antitumor activity and resistance of multiple chemotherapeutic drugs. Our previous study revealed that adrenomedullin (ADM) was engaged in sunitinib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, it has yet to be investigated whether and how ADM regulates sunitinib resistance by cuproptosis. This study found that the ADM expression was elevated in sunitinib-resistant ccRCC tissues and cells. Furthermore, the upregulation of ADM significantly enhanced the chemoresistance of sunitinib compared with their respective control. Moreover, cuproptosis was involved in ADM-regulated sunitinib resistance by inhibiting mammalian ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) expression. Mechanically, the upregulated ADM activates the p38/MAPK signaling pathway to promote Forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) phosphorylation and its entry into the nucleus. Consequently, the increased FOXO3 in the nucleus inhibited FDX1 transcription and cell cuproptosis, promoting chemoresistance. Collectively, cuproptosis has a critical effector role in ccRCC progress and chemoresistance and thus is a relevant target to eradicate the cell population of sunitinib resistance.

Pathological concordance rate and outcomes by subtype in advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of subtyping (type 1 vs 2) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) in patients treated with targeted therapy, as well as the concordance, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of local review pathology review. METHODS: Patients with advanced refractory PRCC were randomised to receive sunitinib or cabozantinib, crizotinib or savolitinib, stratified by PRCC subtype (type 1, type 2, or not otherwise specified [NOS]/mixed) by local review. Central review was retrospectively conducted by three expert genitourinary pathologists who independently reviewed cases. The sensitivity and PPV of local review were estimated and outcomes [objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS)] were summarised for treatment groups stratified by subtypes by central review. RESULTS: Amongst the 147 patients reviewed, the prevalence of individual subtypes varied by local or central review (type 1: 17.7% vs 29.3%; type 2: 53.1% vs 45.6%; NOS/mixed: 29.3% vs 25.2%), respectively. Individual cases were frequently reclassified and local pathology review demonstrated low sensitivity (type 1: 48%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 33, 65; type 2: 67%, 95% CI 55, 78; NOS/mixed: 43%, 95% CI 27, 61). The PPVs of local review were 80%, 57.7% and 37% for type 1, 2 and NOS/mixed, respectively. Compared to sunitinib, cabozantinib demonstrated improved PFS for both type 1 and type 2 PRCC subgroups (7.4 vs 9.0 and 2.9 vs 5.6 months, respectfully) as well as higher ORR. CONCLUSIONS: The PRCC subtype assignment did not identify a subset of patients with greater clinical benefit from cabozantinib, with significant discordance between local and central review. Our findings confirm the limited clinical value of pathological subtyping of metastatic PRCC, in line with the recent World Health Organisation 2022 guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, categorising papillary renal cell carcinoma into type 1 or 2 subtypes showed limited concordance between central and local pathological review and did not enrich for patients more likely to benefit from cabozantinib in the S1500 PAPMET trial.

Combination immune checkpoint and targeted protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of renal cell carcinomas.

Kidney cancers comprise about 3% of all new malignancies in the United States. Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are the most common type of renal malignancy making up about 85% of kidney cancer cases. Signs and symptoms of renal cell carcinomas can result from local tumor growth, paraneoplastic syndromes, or distant metastases. The classic triad of presentation with flank pain, hematuria, and a palpable abdominal mass occurs in fewer than 10% of patients. Most diagnoses result from incidental imaging findings (ultrasonography or abdominal CT imaging) performed for another reason. Localized disease is treated by partial nephrectomy, total nephrectomy, or ablation (tumor destruction with heat or cold). When the tumors have metastasized, systemic therapy with protein-tyrosine kinase antagonists including sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and tivozanib that target vascular endothelial, platelet-derived, fibroblast, hepatocyte, and stem cell factor growth factor receptors (VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, MET, and Kit) were prescribed after 2005. The monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (targeting programed cell death protein 1, PD1) was approved for the treatment of RCCs in 2015. It is usually used now in combination with ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4) or cabozantinib (a multikinase blocker). Other combination therapies include pembrolizumab (targeting PD1) and axitinib (a VEGFR and PDGFR blocker) or lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor). Since the KEYNOTE-426 clinical trial, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors is now the standard of care for most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas and monotherapies are used only in those individuals who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The VEGFs/VEGFRs system in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: Pathophysiological roles and therapeutic implications.

The vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their cognate receptors (VEGFRs), besides their well-known involvement in physiological angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis and in diseases associated to pathological vessel formation, play multifaceted functions in the central nervous system (CNS). In addition to shaping brain development, by controlling cerebral vasculogenesis and regulating neurogenesis as well as astrocyte differentiation, the VEGFs/VEGFRs axis exerts essential functions in the adult brain both in physiological and pathological contexts. In this article, after describing the physiological VEGFs/VEGFRs functions in the CNS, we focus on the VEGFs/VEGFRs involvement in neurodegenerative diseases by reviewing the current literature on the rather complex VEGFs/VEGFRs contribution to the pathogenic mechanisms of Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases. Thereafter, based on the outcome of VEGFs/VEGFRs targeting in animal models of AD and PD, we discuss the factual relevance of pharmacological VEGFs/VEGFRs modulation as a novel and potential disease-modifying approach for these neurodegenerative pathologies. Specific VEGFRs targeting, aimed at selective VEGFR-1 inhibition, while preserving VEGFR-2 signal transduction, appears as a promising strategy to hit the molecular mechanisms underlying AD pathology. Moreover, therapeutic VEGFs-based approaches can be proposed for PD treatment, with the aim of fine-tuning their brain levels to amplify neurotrophic/neuroprotective effects while limiting an excessive impact on vascular permeability.

The effect of concomitant beta-blocker use on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors in the first line.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is one of the cornerstones of treatment in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Since RCC is a disease of advanced age and hypertension as a side effect of VEGF receptor inhibitors, beta-blocker use is common in these patients. We aimed to compare the treatment efficacy and survival results in case of concomitant use of these two drugs due to the inhibition of VEGF in beta-blockers. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with a diagnosis of mRCC who used sunitinib or pazopanib in first-line therapy were included in the study. These patients were divided into two groups as those using concomitant beta-blockers and those not using them. RESULT: The median overall survival (mOS) of the patient using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 47 (95% CI 29.0-65.0) months, and the mOS of those not using concomitant beta-blocker was 18 (95% CI 8.9-27.1) months (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the patients using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 20.4 (95% CI 4.5-40.1) months, and the mPFS of those not using it was 11.4 (95% CI 5.9-16.9) months (p = 0.042). Concomitant beta-blocker use was found to be a good prognostic factor for OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, concomitant beta-blocker use had a trend towards statistical significance for PFS (p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of betablockers with sunitinib or pazopanib is associated with longer overall survial and progression free survival.

Real-world effectiveness of first- and second-line anti-angiogenesis therapy in RCC: analysis of a UK-based population.

Aim: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh commonest cancer in the UK, where first-line (1L) sunitinib and second-line (2L) axitinib are treatment options.Methods: Retrospective, non-interventional data from the Christie NHS Foundation Trust (Manchester, UK). The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS).Results: For 1L sunitinib (n = 622) and 2L axitinib (n = 121), mPFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (7.6, 9.9) and 6.2 (4.9, 9.3) months, respectively. In 1L, Karnofsky performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophils, hemoglobin, time from diagnosis to treatment and age were predictors (p < 0.05) of PFS. In 2L, LDH and platelets were predictors of PFS (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Sunitinib and axitinib were effective treatments for RCC. PFS predictors varied between 1L and 2L; LDH was a predictor for both.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04033991 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

The INSIGHT study: a randomized, Phase III study of ripretinib versus sunitinib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

Somatic KIT activating mutations drive most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Disease progression eventually develops with first-line imatinib, commonly due to KIT secondary mutations, and different kinase inhibitors have various levels of treatment efficacy dependent on specific acquired resistance mutations. Ripretinib is a broad-spectrum switch-control KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with advanced GIST who received prior treatment with three or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis from the second-line INTRIGUE trial determined that patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations restricted to KIT exons 17/18 had greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib. We describe the rationale and design of INSIGHT (NCT05734105), an ongoing Phase III open-label study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib exclusively harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations detected by circulating tumor DNA.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05734105 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is rare, but it is the most common mesenchymal tumor (a type of tumor that develops from cells which give rise to soft tissues) of the gastrointestinal tract. The primary treatment for advanced GIST is medication that targets the abnormal mechanisms in cancer cells in order to block tumor growth and spread. Ripretinib is an inhibitor of a protein known as KIT, which is a member of the tyrosine kinase protein family and is involved in the growth of GIST. In a Phase III clinical trial called INTRIGUE, the effects of ripretinib and another receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, were compared in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with the drug imatinib. An exploratory analysis from the INTRIGUE trial that characterized baseline circulating tumor DNA in the blood showed a greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with gene mutations solely occurring in KIT exon 11 + 17 and/or 18 (exon 11 + 17/18). This article describes the rationale and design for a Phase III clinical trial called INSIGHT that will evaluate the benefit of ripretinib compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST whose tumors have mutations in KIT exon 11 and KIT exon 17 and/or 18. Patients will receive ripretinib or sunitinib in 6-week cycles, and investigators will assess survival without cancer progression as the primary outcome, and overall survival, and response of the tumor to these two drugs as secondary outcomes.

A multifunctional PEGylated liposomal-encapsulated sunitinib enhancing autophagy, immunomodulation, and safety in renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib is a multikinase inhibitor used to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, sunitinib toxicity makes it a double-edged sword. Potent immune modulation by sunitinib extends to nuclear interactions. To address these issues, there is an urgent need for delivery vectors suitable for sunitinib treatment. METHODS: We developed PEGylated liposomes as delivery vectors to precisely target sunitinib (lipo-sunitinib) to RCC tumors. Further investigations, including RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), were performed to evaluate transcriptomic changes in these pathways. DiI/DiR-labeled lipo-sunitinib was used for the biodistribution analysis. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence (IF) were used to examine immune modulation in orthotopic RCC models. RESULTS: The evaluation of results indicated that lipo-sunitinib precisely targeted the tumor site to induce autophagy and was readily taken up by RCC tumor cells. In addition, transcriptomic assays revealed that following lipo-sunitinib treatment, autophagy, antigen presentation, cytokine, and chemokine production pathways were upregulated, whereas the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway was downregulated. In vivo data provided evidence supporting the inhibitory effect of lipo-sunitinib on RCC tumor progression and metastasis. Flow cytometry further demonstrated that liposunitinib increased the infiltration of effector T cells (Teffs) and conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) into the tumor. Furthermore, systemic immune organs such as the tumor-draining lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow exhibited upregulated anticancer immunity following lipo-sunitinib treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that lipo-sunitinib is distributed at the RCC tumor site, concurrently inducing potent autophagy, elevating antigen presentation, activating cytokine and chemokine production pathways, and downregulating EMT in RCC cells. This comprehensive approach significantly enhanced tumor inhibition and promoted anticancer immune modulation.

Radioligand therapy in the therapeutic strategy for patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a consensus statement from the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet), Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

PURPOSE: This paper outlines the consensus of the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors(Itanet), the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) on treating neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)with radioligand therapy (RLT). METHODS: A list of 10 questions regarding using RLT ingastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) was addressed after a careful review of theavailable literature. compiling information from the MEDLINE database, augmented with expert opinionsand recommendations, aligns with the latest scientific research and the author's extensive knowledge.The recommendations are evaluated using the GRADE system, showcasing the level of evidence andthe strength of the recommendations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, this paper focuses on thesubcategories of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) thatexpress somatostatin receptors and are considered suitable for RLT, according to internationalguidelines.

Sunitinib-induced endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis with IgA2 deposit in addition to thrombotic microangiopathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used as a second-line therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resistant to imatinib. However, its impact on the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway can lead to significant toxicities, including hypertension and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes a unique instance of a patient with metastatic GIST who developed endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis (EPGN) with IgA2 deposits and TMA following sunitinib treatment. The patient presented with severe hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, and acute kidney injury. Renal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, revealing IgA2 deposits, which are not commonly associated with TMA. Discontinuation of sunitinib led to a rapid improvement in renal function and proteinuria. The potential mechanisms underlying sunitinib-induced glomerular injury may involve the blockade of VEGFR-1, affecting immune cell recruitment and function, and the disruption of the nitric oxide and endothelin systems, leading to endothelial damage and immune dysregulation. Management of these toxicities requires a personalized approach, with options ranging from symptomatic relief to drug discontinuation. The use of endothelin receptor antagonists and other therapeutic alternatives for GIST management is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the complex interplay between the therapeutic effects of sunitinib and its potential renal and cardiovascular toxicities, emphasizing the need for close monitoring and effective management strategies to optimize patient outcomes.