Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.

The human brain has a remarkable capacity to focus processing resources based on the features and the relevance of the task at hand. The two cerebral hemispheres contribute differentially to this capacity, with the left hemisphere linguistic and right hemisphere visuo-spatial abilities each offering unique contributions. For example, previous research has established that healthy participants set the subjective mid-point of written sentences more leftwards of center, compared to unpronounceable letter strings or simple lines. Remarkably, patients with right hemisphere damage exhibiting unilateral spatial neglect also show this pattern, even though, as well known in the literature, they tend toward a rightward- bias for non-linguistic stimuli. This evidence suggests that the leftward bias for sentential material is due to linguistic, mainly left-hemisphere mediated processes, which are largely unimpaired in right brain-damaged patients, and intact in heathy participants. To test this hypothesis, we compared sentence bisection performance to that of letter strings and simple lines in left brain-damaged patients (with and without aphasia). If the larger leftward bias in the bisection of sentential material is based on linguistic processes, then the left brain-damaged patients should show a reduction or absence of a leftward bias in sentence bisection. We tested twenty-four left brain-damaged patients (12 with aphasia and 12 without aphasia), and 24 age-matched elderly participants (patients and controls were all right-handed). Participants were asked to bisect 240 stimuli, comprising: (i) affirmative and interrogative clauses, (ii) sentences with lexical and syntactic violations, (iii) letter strings and (iv) simple lines. As predicted, neurologically intact participants showed larger leftward biases in bisecting written readable sentences compared to strings of letters. In contrast, the left hemispheredamaged patients (both with and without aphasia) showed no differences in bisecting sentences and letter strings or lines. These findings indicate that the larger leftward bias exhibited by healthy participants in the bisection of sentences is likely due to ortho-phonological coding taking place implicitly during the bisection task. This ortho-phonological coding is impaired with left brain damage - also in absence of apparent aphasia - leading to the left hemispheredamaged patients showing a reduced leftward bias in sentence bisection. These findings support the hypothesis that the leftward bias in the bisection of written sentences is the result of ortho-phonological influences rather than visual-spatial biases.

What makes a word so attractive? Disclosing the urge to read while bisecting.

Expert readers have been repeatedly reported to misperceive the centre of visual stimuli, shifting systematically to the left the bisection of any lines (pseudoneglect) while showing a cross-over effect while bisecting different types of orthographic strings (Arduino et al., 2010, Neuropsychologia, 48, 2140). This difference has been attributed to asymmetrical allocation of attention that visuo-verbal material receives when lexical access occurs (e.g., Fischer, 2004, Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 163). The aim of this study was to further examine which visual features guide recognition of potentially orthographic materials. To disentangle the role of orthography, heterogeneity, and visuo-perceptual discreteness, we presented Italian unimpaired adults with four experiments exploiting the bisection paradigm. The results showed that a cross-over effect emerges in most discrete strings, especially when their internal structure, that is being composed of heterogeneous elements, is suggestive of orthographically relevant material. Interestingly, the cross-over effect systematically characterized the processing of letter strings (Experiment 2) and words (Experiments 3 and 4), whether visually discrete or not. Overall, this pattern of results suggests that neither discreteness nor heterogeneity per se are responsible for activating visual scanning mechanisms implied in text exploration, although both contribute to increasing the chance of a visual stimulus undergoing a perceptual analysis dedicated to pre-lexical processing.

Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect.

The bisection of lines positioned radially (with the two ends of the line close and far, with respect to the participant's body) has been less investigated than that of lines placed horizontally (with their two ends left and right, with respect to the body's midsagittal plane). In horizontal bisection, patients with left neglect typically show a rightward bias for both lines and words, greater with longer stimuli. As for radial bisection, available data indicate that neurologically unimpaired participants make a distal error, while results from right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect are contradictory. We investigated the bisection of radially oriented words, with the prediction that, during bisection, linguistic material would be recoded to its canonical left-to-right format in reading, with the performance of neglect patients being similar to that for horizontal words. Thirteen right-brain-damaged patients (seven with left spatial neglect) and fourteen healthy controls were asked to manually bisect 40 radial and 40 horizontal words (5-10 letters), and 80 lines, 40 radial and 40 horizontal, of comparable length. Right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect exhibited a proximal bias in the bisection of short radial words, with the proximal part corresponding to the final right part of horizontally oriented words. This proximal error was not found in patients without neglect and healthy controls. For bisection, short radial words may be recoded to the canonical orthographic horizontal format, unveiling the impact of left neglect on radially oriented stimuli.