Clinical Outcomes of 5000 IU Heparin Versus Activated Clotting Time-Guided Heparinization During Noncardiac Arterial Procedures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during noncardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) than a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Better anticoagulation should potentially result in lower incidence of thrombo-embolic complications (TEC). Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes of these heparinization strategies are scarce. This study investigated clinical outcomes of ACT-guided heparinization with a starting dose of 100 IU/kg in comparison with a single standardized bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing NCAP in 2 vascular centers was performed. Patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization were matched 1:1 with patients receiving 5000 IU heparin using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes were TEC, bleeding complications, and mortality within 30 days of procedure or during the same admission. RESULTS: A total of 759 patients (5000 IU heparin: 213 patients, ACT-guided heparinization: 546 patients) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 209 patients in each treatment group. After PSM, the groups were comparable, with the exception of a higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in the ACT-guided heparinization group (103 patients, 49% vs 82 patients, 39%, p=0.039). The target ACT (>200 seconds) was reached in 198 patients (95%) of the ACT-guided group versus 71 patients (34%) of the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), indicating successful execution of the ACT-guided protocol. Incidence of TEC (13 patients, 6.2% vs 10 patients, 4.8%, p=0.52), mortality (3 patients, 1.4% vs 0 patients, p=0.25), and bleeding complications (32 patients, 15% vs 25 patients, 12%, p=0.32) did not differ between patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization and 5000 IU heparin. Protamine was administered in 118 patients (57%) in the ACT group versus 11 patients (5.3%) in the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), but did not influence incidence of TEC (17 patients, 5.9% vs 6 patients, 4.7%, p=0.61) or bleeding complications (34 patients, 12% vs 22 patients, 17%, p=0.14). CONCLUSION: No difference in TEC, bleeding complications, or mortality was found between ACT-guided heparinization and a single bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP. CLINICAL IMPACT: Previous studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) then a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes are scarce. This study focussed on clinical outcomes of both protocols in NCAP in a propensity score matched cohort. Thrombo-embolic complications (TEC), bleeding complications and mortality within 30 days after NCAP or during the same admission were comparable between groups. Future studies should focus on optimizing ACT-guided protocols, specifically in patients with a high risk of TEC and bleeding complications.

Anticoagulation Intensity during Appendage Occlusion: Lessons from Silent Cerebral Embolism.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is associated with a high incidence of peri-procedure silent cerebral embolism (SCE), while the recommended activated clotting time (ACT) level by the expert consensus is lower than that in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether raising the targeted ACT level during LAAO to the same level as AF ablation could decrease the incidence of SCE. METHODS: It was a prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive AF patients receiving LAAO between January 2021 and December 2022 were included and categorized into two groups based on the time of enrollment. Patients enrolled in 2021 (group 250) maintained a target ACT level of ≥250 s during LAAO procedure, while patients enrolled in 2022 (group 300) maintained the peri-procedure ACT ≥300 s. All patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging before and after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were included (38 in the group 250 and 43 in the group 300). After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), patients in the group 250 showed a significantly lower incidence of SCE than group 300 (IPTW p = 0.038). Only a stable high ACT pattern could decrease the risk of SCE. No significant differences were found between other ACT change patterns on the SCE incidence. CONCLUSION: Raising the peri-procedure ACT level to a stable 300 s could decrease the risk of the SCE without increasing the major bleeding events.

Ability of activated clotting time measurements to monitor unfractionated heparin activity during non-cardiac arterial procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Activated clotting time (ACT) measurements are frequently used to monitor unfractionated heparin activity during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). Accuracy of ACT-guided heparinization is mandatory to prevent heparin under- and overdosing, thereby minimizing thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) and bleeding risk. The main objective of this study was to investigate accuracy of ACT to monitor heparin activity during NCAP using the Hemostasis Management System Plus with high-range cartridges. ACT values were compared with anti-Xa measurements, regarded as the standard test to measure active heparin. METHODS: This was a single centre, prospective, observational cohort study. Perioperative blood samples of patients undergoing NCAP between December 2022 and September 2023 were used to perform bedside ACT measurements and anti-Xa assays in the clinical laboratory. Primary outcome was correlation between ACT and anti-Xa measurements. TEC, mortality and bleeding complications within 30 days postoperatively or during primary admission were also scored. RESULTS: 196 pairs of ACT and anti-Xa measurements were performed in 34 patients. Strong correlation was observed between anti-Xa and ACT measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.79 - 0.87, p < 0.001). Apart from anti-Xa, no additional variables were associated with ACT in multivariate linear regression analyses (regression coefficient ß = 36.7, 95% CI = 33.3 - 40.1, p < 0.001). Bleeding complications occurred in 29% of the patients, while both TEC and mortality were observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: strong correlation and an independent association were observed between heparin activity measured by anti-Xa and ACT using the Hemostasis Management System Plus.

Anticoagulation Monitoring Using Activated Clotting Time in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-Analysis of Correlation Coefficients.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires systemic anticoagulation to maintain the circuit patency. However, the use of anticoagulation carries a risk of severe hemorrhage, necessitating rigorous monitoring. Activated clotting time (ACT) is a widely used monitoring tool; however, the evidence of its correlation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion dose is limited. Here we aimed to analyze the correlation between ACT and UFH infusion during ECMO. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients (Scopus and PubMed, up to July 13, 2024). PROSPERO: CRD42023448888 SETTING: All retrospective and prospective studies PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving ECMO support INTERVENTION: Anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in the analysis, and the meta-analysis encompassed 16 studies. The vast majority of studies (n = 15) found a weak correlation, and no study reported a strong correlation between ACT and UFH infusion dose. The meta-analysis (n = 12,625 samples) identified a weak correlation, with a pooled estimate of correlation coefficients of 0.132 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.23). The most common adverse events were hemorrhage (pooled incidence, 45%) and thrombosis (30%), and 47% of the patients died during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Even though ACT is a widely used UFH monitoring tool in ECMO patients, our meta-analysis found a weak correlation between ACT and UFH infusion dose. New trials are needed to investigate the role of emerging tools and to clarify the most appropriate monitoring strategy for patients receiving ECMO support.

Use of a New Standardized Unfractionated Heparin Protocol for Left-Sided Ablation Procedures Improves Time in the Therapeutic ACT Range.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether a novel standardized heparin dosing protocol used during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation resulted in a higher percentage of therapeutic activated clotting time (ACT) values compared to historic nonstandardized procedures. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study SETTING: This study was conducted at Ochsner Medical Center, the largest tertiary-care teaching hospital in New Orleans, LA PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation INTERVENTIONS: The authors implemented a standardized heparin protocol, and enrolled 202 patients between November 2020 and March 2021. The historic controls consisted of 173 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation between April 2020 and September 2020. Heparin administration in the control group was based on physician preference and was nonstandardized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the percentage of intraprocedural ACTs in therapeutic range (≥300 to <450 s). Secondary endpoints included first measured ACT at ≥300 s and percent of measured ACTs in the supratherapeutic range (>450 s). Comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests or Fisher exact tests. Patients in the intervention group had a higher mean percentage of ACTs in the therapeutic range compared to the control group (84.9% vs. 75.8%, p<0.001). More patients in the intervention group reached therapeutic ACT on the first measurement compared to the control group (70.3% vs. 31.2%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: During catheter-based cardiac ablation procedures, a novel standardized unfractionated heparin dosing protocol resulted in a higher percentage of ACTs in the target range, and a higher proportion of initial ACTs in the therapeutic range compared with baseline nonstandardized heparin dosing.

Association of Activated Clotting Time-Guided Anticoagulation with Complications during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires systemic anticoagulation to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events. Despite its historic role, activated clotting time (ACT) remains a widely used heparin monitoring method. Systematic evidence on the association of ACT-guided monitoring with hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications does not exist. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis (Scopus and PubMed, July 2023). SETTING: All cohort studies. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving ECMO support. INTERVENTION: Anticoagulation monitoring with ACT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 3,177 publications, with 8 studies reporting the average ACT values for patients with and without bleeding. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the compared groups (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI -0.05 to 1.43, p = 0.069; I2 = 87.4%). Three studies (n = 117 patients) reported on the average ACT values for patients with thrombosis, without significant differences in ACT between patients with and without thrombosis (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI -0.50 to 1.44, p = 0.342; I2 = 81.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though ACT is a widely used heparin monitoring tool, the evidence on its association with hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events is still controversial and limited. Further studies are essential to elucidate the role of ACT in anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support.

Contributing factors to heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Since the risk factors for heparin resistance (HR) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have not been fully clarified, this study investigated the contributing factors for HR after the initial unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose of 500 IU/kg. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 371 patients who underwent CPB surgery, with the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg, between May 2017 and December 2021. We defined HR as the failure to achieve activated clotting time (ACT) of > 480 s after the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg. HR was observed in 36 patients (9.7%) (HR group), while HR was not observed in 335 patients (control group). The HR group included significantly more patients with preoperative use of UFH, with significantly higher white blood cell counts, fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation products, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein, and lower hemoglobin and albumin. The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified albumin (OR: 3.09, 95% CI 1.3504-7.0845, p = 0.0075) and fibrinogen (OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.9869-0.9963, p = 0.0003) as independent predictors for HR. Using the Youden index, the cutoffs of albumin and fibrinogen were calculated as 3.8 g/dL and 303 mg/dL, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed the predictive performance of albumin (area under the curve (AUC): 0.78, sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 81%) and fibrinogen (AUC: 0.77, sensitivity: 56%, specificity: 88%). The incidence of HR after the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg was 9.7%. The preoperative albumin < 3.8 g/dL and fibrinogen > 303 mg/dL were independent predictors for HR.

Relation between antithrombin-III activity and activated clotting time for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Heparin resistance (HR) is observed before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), despite with normal antithrombin III (AT-III) levels. The relationships between preoperative AT-III activity and activated clotting time (ACT) after the first heparin dose should be clarified. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 818 patients who underwent CPB surgery, with the initial heparin of 300, 400, and 500 IU/kg, between 2017 and 2021. We defined HR as the failure to achieve ACT after the initial heparin dose (Post ACT) of > 480 s.There were no significant correlations between the AT-III activity and Post ACT in all patients, including 143 patients with AT-III activity < 80% and 675 patients with AT-III activity of ≥ 80%. Also, there were no significant correlations between the AT-III activity and Post ACT in 74 patients who received heparin of 300 IU/kg, in 186 patients with 400 IU/kg, and in 339 patients with 500 IU/kg. After identifying smoking, HR, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), and ACT as influencing factors, multiple comparisons using the Steel-Dwass test showed significant difference in FDP and HR among the patients who received heparin of 300 IU/kg, 400 IU/kg, and 500 IU/kg. There is no association between preoperative AT-III activity and ACT after the first heparin administration for CPB, even in different dose of heparin. Rather, the higher the initial UFH dose is, the higher ACT may be, regardless of the AT-III activity.

Systematic review of clinical guidelines and consensus statements concerning heparin and protamine dosing and monitoring of anticoagulation levels for non-cardiac arterial procedures.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was performed to examine all published practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements (together: GCS) on heparin dosing and monitoring during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). The objective was to scrutinize the recommendations and advice outlined within these GCS documents and to evaluate the supporting evidence for these recommendations. Additionally, the use of the activated clotting time (ACT) and target ACT values were explored. METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify all GCSs in the English language on NCAP. The final literature search was performed in January 2023. This search was supplemented by searching websites of relevant professional vascular surgical organizations for GCSs. Titles and abstracts were assessed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of 9716 titles identified, 27 GCSs met the predefined inclusion criteria: six GCSs regarding carotid intervention, seven regarding procedures for aneurysmal disease of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries, 12 regarding interventions for acute and chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease and two regarding open and endovascular interventions of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. Administration of heparin is advised for al NCAP. There was high variability concerning heparin dose: both standard dose as weight based dosing (30-150 IU/kg) was advised. Recommendations on repeated doses, ACT monitoring and heparin reversal using protamine also varied widely. In none of the GCSs, the type of the ACT measuring device or used cartridges were specified. CONCLUSIONS: Large variability was found between the included GCSs with regard to the recommendations on heparin dose and target ACT values during NCAP. Advice and recommendations in GCSs were based on low-quality studies or without providing any reference at all. The described variability in recommendations emphasizes the need for large prospective (randomized) studies or the incorporation of data on heparin and the use of ACT monitoring into verified vascular surgery registries, to develop evidence-based, practical and uniform applicable recommendations.

Lupus anticoagulant and valvular cardiac surgery.

Despite its name, lupus anticoagulant (LAC) neither exclusively occurs in lupus nor induces anticoagulation. It is an antiphospholipid antibody found in 2%-4% of the population that promotes clot formation by targeting phospholipid-protein complexes in cell membranes. However, in vitro, LAC exhibits paradoxical effects, prolonging clotting times in phospholipid-dependent assays such as Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT). This unpredictability extends to point-of-care tests like Activated Clotting Time (ACT), which are frequently used to monitor anticoagulation during cardiac surgeries involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). High doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) are administered in these procedures, but the presence of LAC complicates ACT measurements, creating challenges for both anesthesiologists and surgeons. This case report highlights the clinical implications of LAC in perioperative management, underscoring the difficulties in ensuring adequate anticoagulation during CPB.

The Effect of Smoking on the Activated Clotting Time and the Incidence of Complications in Noncardiac Arterial Procedures.

PURPOSE: Smoking is a well-known risk factor for developing arterial diseases and for an increase of complications during and after vascular procedures. Although smoking has a proven effect on hemostasis, no literature is available on the effect of smoking on the activated clotting time (ACT), which is used to monitor the effect of heparin during noncardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of smoking on ACT values and the incidence of complications during the same admission or 30 day follow-up of NCAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Patients older than 18 years, who underwent NCAP between December 2016 and April 2021, were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on smoking status: never/former smokers and current smokers. Two heparin dosing protocols were used: an initial bolus of 5000 IU or 100 IU/kg bodyweight. RESULTS: In total, 773 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five minutes after administration of 5000 IU of heparin, mean ACT values were 190 and 196 seconds for nonsmokers and smokers, respectively (p=0.078). After 100 IU/kg of heparin, mean ACT values were 229 and 226 seconds for nonsmokers and smokers, respectively (p=0.37). Incidence of complications in the whole study cohort was not significantly different for nonsmokers compared with smokers (arterial thrombo-embolic complication [ATEC] 4.7% vs 5.7% p=0.55; hemorrhagic complications 15% vs 18% p=0.29). In subgroup-analysis, a significant difference between smoking groups was found for hemorrhagic complications after open aneurysm repair (p=0.024). However, after adjusting for confounders, the difference between the smoking groups annulled. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that smoking does not have a significant effect on ACT values or on the incidence of complications in NCAP. Large-scale studies are required to further analyze potential factors having an effect on the ACT and perioperative and postoperative complications, which could help individualize heparinization strategy. CLINICAL IMPACT: There is high variance between patients in their response on administration of heparin, this is not yet fully understood. This study investigated the effect of smoking in a large prospective multicentre cohort. The results suggests that active smoking does not have an effect on the activated clotting time after administration of heparin. Also no significant effect of smoking could be found on the incidence of all registered complications. Monitoring of the effect of heparin remains important to provide patients with safe anticoagulation during vascular procedures.

Perprocedural Heparinization in Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures: The Current Practice in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Heparin is the most widely-used anticoagulant to prevent thrombo-embolic complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence and consequently non-uniformity in guidelines on perprocedural heparin management. Detailed insight into the current practice of antithrombotic strategies during NCAP in the Netherlands is important, aiming to identify potential optimal protocols and local differences concerning perprocedural heparinization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive online survey was distributed electronically to vascular surgeons of every hospital in the Netherlands in which NCAP were performed. Data were collected from September 2020 to October 2021. RESULTS: The response rate was 90% (53/59 hospitals). During NCAP, all surgeons generally administered heparin before arterial clamping. In 74% (39/54) of hospitals, a single heparin dosing protocol was used for all types of patients and vascular procedures. In 40%, there was no uniformity in heparin dosing between vascular surgeons. Depending on the procedure, a fixed bolus heparin, predominantly 5000 IU, was administered in 73% to 93%. In the remaining hospitals (7%-27%), a bodyweight-based heparin protocol was used, with an initial dose of 70 or 100 IU/kg. A minority (28%) monitored the effect of heparin in patients using the activated clotting time add (ACT) after activated clotting time. Target values varied between 180 and 250 seconds or 2 times the baseline ACT. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates considerable variability in perprocedural heparinization during NCAP in the Netherlands. Future research on heparin dosing is needed to harmonize and optimize heparin dosage protocols and contemporary guidelines during NCAP, and thereby improve vascular surgical care and patient safety. CLINICAL IMPACT: This survey demonstrated persisting intra- and inter-hospital variability in perprocedural heparinization during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) in the Netherlands. The observed variability in heparinization strategies highlights the need for high quality evidence on perprocedural anticoagulation strategies. This is needed in order to harmonize and optimize heparin dosage protocols and contemporary guidelines and thereby improve vascular surgical patient care. Based on the current results, an international survey will be conducted by the authors to gain additional insight into the antithrombotic strategies used during NCAP, aiming to harmonize anticoagulation protocols worldwide.

The Additional Value of Activated Clotting Time-Guided Heparinization During Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

PURPOSE: Unfractionated heparin is widely used to lower the risk of arterial thromboembolic complications (ATECs) during interventions for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but it is still unknown which heparin dose is the safest in terms of preventing ATECs and bleeding complications. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of complications during interventions for PAD and the relation between this incidence and different heparinization protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Between June 2015 and September 2022, 355 patients who underwent peripheral interventions for PAD were included. All patients who were included before July 2018 received 5000 international units (IU) of heparin (group 1). Starting from July 2018, all included patients received an initial dose of 100 IU/kg, with potential additional heparin doses based on activated clotting time (ACT) values (group 2). Data on ACT values and complications within 30 days post-procedurally were collected. RESULTS: In total, 24 ATECs and 48 bleeding complications occurred. In group 1, 8.7% (n=11) of patients suffered from ATEC, compared with 5.7% (n=13) in group 2. Thirteen percent of patients (n=17) in group 1 had a bleeding complication, compared with 14% (n=31) in group 2. Arterial thromboembolic complications were more often found in patients with peak ACT values of <200 seconds, compared with ACT values between 200 and 250 seconds, 15% (n=6) versus 5.9% (n=9), respectively, p=0.048. Patients with peak ACT values >250 seconds had a higher incidence of bleeding complications compared with an ACT between 200 and 250 seconds, 24% (n=21) versus 9.8% (n=15), respectively, p=0.003. Forty-four percent of patients (n=23) in group 1 reached a peak ACT of >200 seconds, compared with 95% (n=218) of patients in group 2 (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: ATEC was found in 6.8% (n=24) and bleeding complications in 14% (n=48) of patients who underwent a procedure for PAD. There was a significantly higher incidence of ATECs in patients with a peak ACT value <200 seconds, and a higher incidence of bleeding complications in patients with a peak ACT value >250 seconds. The findings obtained from this study may serve as a basis for conducting future research on heparinization during procedures for PAD, with a larger sample size. CLINICAL IMPACT: Heparin is administered during arterial interventions for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to decrease the risk of arterial (thrombo)embolic complications (ATEC) during or shortly following surgery. The effect of heparin is unpredictable in the individual patient, and the optimal dosage of this anticoagulant has not yet been established. Using the activated clotting time (ACT), the anticoagulatory effect of heparin can be monitored periprocedurally. Previous research on the incidence of both ATEC and bleeding complications, or on the optimal dosage of heparin administration, is scarce. This study aims to investigate the incidence of ATEC and bleeding complications between 2 different dosage protocols of heparin-a standard bolus of 5000 IU or ACT-guided heparinization-and thereby provide clarity on the optimal dose of heparin during peripheral arterial interventions for PAD.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model Affecting the ACT Targeting Rate During Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in China.

CONTEXT: A nomogram model affecting the activated clotting time (ACT) targeting rate during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (RFCA) in China. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting the activated clotting time targeting rate after the initial bolus heparin dosages during the radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in China. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on the data of 465 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) from October 2019 to June 2022. All patients were randomized into a training cohort (70%; n = 325) and a validation cohort (30%; n = 140). Independent risk factors were identified using univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analysis. The predictive nomogram model was established using R software. The nomogram was developed and evaluated based on differentiation, calibration, and clinical efficacy using concordance statistic (C-statistic), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. The nomogram was established using three variables, including sex (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.29-1.76, P = 0.007), heparin dose (OR 0.04; 95%CI 0.02-0.05, P < 0.001), and the baseline ACT (OR 0.03; 95%CI 0.02-0.04, P < 0.001). The C-statistic of the nomogram was 0.736 (95%CI 0.675-0.732) in the training cohort and 0.700 (95%CI 0.622-0.721) in the validation cohort. The calibration plots showed good agreement between the predictions and observations in the training and validation cohorts. The clinical decision curve also proves that the map is useful in clinical settings. CONCLUSION: The nomogram model has good discrimination and accuracy, which can screen attainment groups intuitively and individually, and has a certain predictive value for the probability of ACT reaching the target after the adequate dosage of initial heparin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation.

Minimum protamine dose required to neutralize heparin in cardiac surgery: a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: Excess protamine contributes to coagulopathy following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and may increase blood loss and transfusion requirements. The primary aim of this study was to find the least amount of protamine necessary to neutralize residual heparin following CPB using the gold standard assays of anti-IIa and anti-Xa activity. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether the post-CPB activated clotting time could be used as a surrogate marker for quantifying heparin neutralization. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were enrolled. Protamine administration was standardized through an infusion pump at 25 mg·min-1. Blood samples were withdrawn prior to and following administration of 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg protamine and analyzed for activated clotting time and anti-IIa and -Xa activity. RESULTS: Following a mean (standard deviation) cumulative heparin dose of 67,700 (19,400) units and a CPB duration of 113 (71) min, protamine requirements varied widely. Eight out of 25 (32%) patients showed complete neutralization of anti-IIa and -Xa activity at the first sampling point (150 mg protamine; protamine:heparin ratio, 0.3 [0.1]). A protamine:heparin ratio of 0.5 (0.2) was sufficient for heparin neutralization in > 90% of patients. After CPB, a low to mid-range activated clotting time correlated well with anti-IIa and -Xa activity. CONCLUSIONS: The protamine:heparin ratio required to neutralize residual unfractionated heparin (UFH) following CPB is variable. A protamine:heparin ratio of 0.3 was sufficient to neutralize UFH in some patients, while a ratio of 0.5 is sufficient to neutralize both residual anti-IIa and -Xa activity in most patients. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate their clinical implications. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03787641); registered 26 December 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'excès de protamine contribue à la coagulopathie après la circulation extracorporelle (CEC) et peut augmenter les pertes de sang et les besoins transfusionnels. L'objectif principal de cette étude était de déterminer la quantité minimale de protamine nécessaire pour neutraliser l'héparine résiduelle post-CEC en utilisant les tests de référence de l'activité anti-IIa et anti-Xa. Les objectifs secondaires consistaient à évaluer si le temps de coagulation activé post-CEC pouvait être utilisé comme marqueur de substitution pour quantifier la neutralisation de l'héparine. MéTHODE: Vingt-huit patients consécutifs bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque non urgente ont été recrutés. L'administration de protamine par une pompe à perfusion à 25 mg·min-1 a été normalisée. Des échantillons de sang ont été prélevés avant et après l'administration de 150, 200, 250 et 300 mg de protamine et analysés pour déterminer le temps de coagulation activé et l'activité anti-IIa et -Xa. RéSULTATS: Après une dose cumulative moyenne (écart type) d'héparine de 67 700 (19 400) unités et une durée de CEC moyenne de 113 (71) min, les besoins en protamine variaient considérablement. Huit patients sur 25 (32 %) ont affiché une neutralisation complète de l'activité anti-IIa et -Xa au premier point de prélèvement (150 mg de protamine; rapport protamine : héparine, 0,3 [0,1]). Un rapport protamine/héparine de 0,5 (0,2) était suffisant pour la neutralisation de l'héparine chez > 90 % des patients. Après la CEC, un temps de coagulation activé bas à moyen était bien corrélé avec l'activité anti-IIa et -Xa. CONCLUSION: Le rapport protamine : héparine nécessaire pour neutraliser l'héparine non fractionnée (HNF) résiduelle suivant une CEC est variable. Un rapport protamine : héparine de 0,3 était suffisant pour neutraliser l'HNF chez certains patients, tandis qu'un rapport de 0,5 est suffisant pour neutraliser à la fois l'activité résiduelle des anti-IIa et celle des anti-Xa chez la plupart des patients. Des études plus vastes sont nécessaires pour confirmer ces résultats et évaluer leurs implications cliniques. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03787641); enregistrée le 26 décembre 2018.

Feasibility and safety values of activated clotting time-guided systemic heparinization in coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety values of activated clotting time (ACT)-guided systemic heparinization in reducing periprocedural thrombosis and bleeding complications during coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A total of 228 procedures performed on 213 patients between 2016 and 2021 were included in the retrospective analysis. The target ACT was set at 250 s. Logistic regression was performed to assess predictors for the occurrence of thrombosis and bleeding. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were employed to determine the optimal cut-off values for ACT, heparinization, and procedure time. RESULTS: Most (85.1%) of procedures were stent-assisted embolization. The mean baseline ACT was 128.8 ± 45.7 s. The mean ACT at 20 min after the initial intravenous heparin loading of 78.2 ± 18.8 IU/kg was 185 ± 46.4 s. The mean peak ACT was 255.6 ± 63.8 s with 51.3% (117 cases) achieving the target ACT level. Peak ACT was associated with symptomatic thrombosis (OR per second, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.000-1.016; P = 0.035) (cut-off value, 275 s; area under ROC (AUROC), 0.7624). Total administered heparin dose per body weight was negatively associated with symptomatic thrombosis (OR per IU/kg, 0.972; 95% CI, 0.949-0995; P = 0.018) (cut-off value, 294 IU/kg; AUROC, 0.7426) but positively associated with significant bleeding (OR, 1.008 per IU/kg; 95% CI, 1.005-1.012; P <0 .001) (cut-off value, 242 IU/kg; AUROC, 0.7391). Procedure time was significantly associated with symptomatic thrombosis (OR per minute, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.017-1.084; P value = 0.002) (cut-off value, 158 min; area under ROC, 0.8338). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ACT-guided systemic heparinization was feasible to achieve the target ACT value and proposes probable safety thresholds to prevent periprocedural complications through reducing procedure time during coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the stent era.

Clinical monitoring of activated clotting time during cardiothoracic surgery: comparing the Hemochron® Response and Hemochron® Signature Elite.

INTRODUCTION: The Activated Clotting Time (ACT) is commonly used to manage anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the older manually operated Hemochron® Response and the automated Hemochron® Signature Elite. METHODS: In this observational study the clinically relevant differences of both devices were investigated simultaneously, using duplicate measurements, in 29 patients who underwent a Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) or Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) in order to determine reliability, bias, and to detect which method has the lowest variation. Blood samples were obtained from the arterial line prior to surgery, after administration of 300 IU/kg heparin, 5 minutes after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and successively every 30 minutes, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: A total of 202 measurements were performed. Of these 10 measurements were out of range in the Response and 9 in the Elite. About 27 single unstable magnet errors were seen in the Response versus no measurement errors in the Elite. No statistically significant differences between the Response (p = 0.22, Wilcoxon rank) and Elite (p = 0.064) duplicates were observed. The Response values were consistently higher during heparinization than the Elite measurements (p = 0.002, repeated measurements) with an average positive bias of around 56 seconds during heparinization (Bland-Altman). Overall, the coefficient of variation (CoV) increased during heparinization. CONCLUSION: The Elite was more reliable, but the variation was higher for the Elite than the Response. The observed positive bias in the Response compared to the Elite could affect heparin administration during surgery making the two systems not interchangeable.

Optimum heparin dose in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) was introduced many years ago aiming to reduce the known complications of conventional on-pump coronary surgeries. Heparin is required during the procedures, but the available protocols have diverse dosage regimens. The primary objective of this systematic review is to examine the effect of different heparin doses on the outcomes of OPCABG. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Four reviewers identified eligible clinical trials. Two reviewers extracted data and independently assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane tool. The primary outcome was the activated clotting time (ACT) at three minutes. The secondary outcomes were proportion of patients requiring blood products and the length of hospital stay. An aggregate data approach was used. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three single-center randomized studies recruiting 256 patients were included. The studies compared low-dose (1.5-2 mg/kg) and high-dose (3 mg/kg) heparin boluses. The overall mean difference for ACT after three minutes between low- and high-dose heparin is - 126.16 (95% CI: - 142.19, - 110.14). The proportion of patients requiring blood products after surgery [odd ratio 1.27 (95% CI: 0.69, 2.32)] or the overall length of stay [mean difference -0.15 (95% CI: -0.84, 0.53)] did not differ between the heparin doses. CONCLUSIONS: In OPCABG, high-dose compared with low-dose heparin did not affect the utilization of more blood products or increased the overall length of stay. Unsurprisingly, ACT values were higher in the high-dose heparin group. Larger and adequately powered randomized clinical trials are indicated to resolve the uncertainty.

Variability in Contemporary Heparin Prescription and Activated Clotting Time Monitoring During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Call for Up-To-Date Evidence-Based Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the preferred anticoagulant agent in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures for minimising the risk of thrombotic complications. Because of the narrow therapeutic range of UFH, some society guidelines have advocated the use of the activated clotting time (ACT) test to monitor anticoagulation intensity during PCI to reduce thrombotic and bleeding complications. We aimed to assess the current practice of UFH prescription and its monitoring in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHOD: We conducted an anonymous voluntary cross-sectional survey of interventional cardiologists (ICs) who were members of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand in 2022. The survey included 10 questions pertaining to the current practice of anticoagulation during PCI. RESULTS: Of 430 ICs surveyed, 148 responded (response rate, 34.4%). Most ICs (84.4%) prescribed 70-100 IU/kg of UFH for PCI. Over half of ICs (58.7%) routinely measured ACT during PCI, whereas only 22.2% routinely measured ACT after PCI to guide additional UFH prescription. Among ICs who prescribed additional UFH, approximately half (48%) aimed for ACT ≥250 seconds. Factors that influenced post-PCI UFH prescription included vascular access site and concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The contemporary practice of UFH prescription during PCI and ACT monitoring in ANZ is variable and based on outdated evidence preceding current drug-eluting stents, antiplatelet therapies, and radial-first practice. Current society guideline recommendations lack clarity and agreement, reflecting the quality of the available evidence. Up-to-date clinical trials evaluating UFH prescription and ACT monitoring are needed to optimise clinical outcomes in contemporary PCI procedures.

Emicizumab does not interfere with the activated clotting time.

INTRODUCTION: The activated clotting time (ACT) is a useful marker of unfractionated heparin (UFH) activity during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or cardiac catheterization. Emicizumab, recently approved for bleeding prevention in haemophilia A patients, acts like FVIII but does not need prior activation; it therefore shortens coagulation times in assays using intrinsic pathway activators and so is expected to shorten the ACT. AIM: To evaluated emicizumab's impact on heparin-induced ACT (Hemochron®) prolongation. METHODS: We measured the high-range (HR) ACT in citrated blood samples from healthy donors (HDs) (n = 9), CPB patients (n = 3) and emicizumab-treated patients (n = 5) after spiking with UFH and/or emicizumab. The low range (LR) ACT was also measured in spiked-samples from HDs and emicizumab-treated patients. RESULTS: In HDs, the median [interquartile range] baseline HR-ACTs were similar with and without emicizumab (129 [123-138] and 136 [115-141] s for 50 µg/ml, respectively); whatever the concentration of emicizumab (10 to 50 µg/ml), increasing the UFH concentration (1-5 UI/ml) prolonged the HR-ACT. In blood from patients undergoing CPB, the HR-ACT prolongation observed during this procedure was not masked by emicizumab at any concentration. Likewise, the addition of increasing concentrations of UFH to blood from emicizumab-treated patients induced a concentration-dependent prolongation of HR-ACT. Baseline LR-ACT were prolonged in emicizumab-treated patients but as for HR-ACT, emicizumab does not prevent heparin-induced prolongation of LR-ACT. CONCLUSION: Emicizumab does not interfere with UFH-induced ACT prolongation. The hemochron® ACT can be used to monitor UFH in patients receiving emicizumab during CPB or cardiac catheterization.