Comparative efficacy of intrathecal morphine and adductor canal block in the knee arthroplasty population: a retrospective multi-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Finding the balance of good postoperative analgesia while facilitiating mobility is important for a safe and satisfactory patient experience during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intrathecal morphine, adductor canal block, and their combination in optimizing pain management and postoperative recovery in TKA patients. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data evaluated postoperative pain scores, time to mobilisation, and length of hospital stay. METHODS: 1006 consecutive patients undergoing elective TKA across two large tertiary centres were included over six years. They were divided into one of four groups according to the type of analgesia received: Group N patients received no neuraxial morphine or regional block. Group B patients received adductor canal block (ACB) only. Group M patients received intrathecal morphine (ITM) but no regional block. Group BM patients received both ACB and ITM. RESULTS: Patients who received an ACB had faster postoperative mobilization compared to those without (p < 0.001). Patients in Group BM had the lowest pain scores at rest (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 2.9) and with movement (VAS 5.3), while Group B patients experienced the highest pain scores at rest (VAS 3.7) and on movement (VAS 6.5) (p = 0.005). Patients who received ITM had the lowest opioid requirements (p < 0.001). There was no significant differences between groups in requirement for rescue pain management strategies (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ITM and ACB in patients undergoing TKA provides improved postoperative analgesia with lower postoperative opioid requirement and earlier mobilization compared with ACB or ITM alone.

Comparison ultrasound-guided adductor canal block and surgeon-performed block for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Adductor canal block (ACB) is widely performed for postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-assisted and anesthesiologist-assisted (ultrasound-guided) adductor blocks in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy. METHODS: This study was designed as a double-blind, prospective and randomized trial. A total of 240 participants were randomly allocated to three groups: one where the surgeon performed the adductor canal block (ACBs), another where it was conducted by an anesthetist with ultrasound guidance (ACBa), and a third group without the adductor block. The follow-up management after the Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure occurred on the first, third, and tenth days, as well as the twelfth week. Outcome measures comprised pain assessment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and monitoring opioid analgesic consumption. RESULTS: No significant differences in demographic profiles were observed between the groups. Groups ACBa and ACBs exhibited significantly lower VAS scores compared to the control group at both 3 and 12 h after surgery, with group ACBa showing the lowest VAS scores among all groups. However, at 1 day, 3 days, 10 days and 12 weeks after surgery, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the ACBa and ACBs groups. On the first three days, the ACBa group had the lowest opioid consumption and the lowest total opioid consumption. The differences in VAS scores between the groups began to decrease on the first day after surgery. CONCLUSION: The adductor canal block (ACB) has been demonstrated to be an effective method of reducing pain in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) in the postoperative period. Nevertheless, despite the pronounced impact that ACB performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance has on VAS scores according to intraoperative ACB by surgeons, its effect on clinical outcomes has not been demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This study was retrospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry Platform on July 31, 2024 (NCT06533085).

Adductor Catheter Insertion Through the Knee Arthrotomy: Can This Technique Be as Safe and Effective as Ultrasound-Guided Insertion?

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty remains challenging. We devised a technique for inserting a continuous catheter intraoperatively in the adductor canal and aimed to compare its efficacy and safety with that of an ultrasound-guided anesthetist-administered continuous catheter. METHODS: This single-center, single-surgeon, prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial included 330 patients, who were randomized into two groups with similar preoperative status and demographics. There were 18 patients who met the exclusion criteria. Group A (n = 152) received the block from an anesthetist, while group B (n = 160) received the block from the surgeon. Patients had visual analog scale scores, range of motion, maximum ambulation distance, time to straight leg raise, length of stay, and results from a 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go test, and a 30-second chair test measured preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by a physiotherapist and pain nurse blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores at 12 hours postsurgery were significantly lower in group B (0.66) compared to group A (0.77, P = 0.04). Range of motion (supine flexion 43.2 versus 43.1, P = 0.72; sitting flexion 90.0 versus 89.9, P = 0.17), Timed Up and Go test (126.1 versus 136.9, P = 0.9), 10-meter walk test (163.5 versus 165.4, P = 0.7), 30-second chair test (3.7 versus 3.8, P = 0.7), time to active straight leg raise (4.0 versus 4.1, P = 0.3), time to ambulation with walker (4.02 versus 4.05, P = 0.3), and length of stay (1.44 versus 1.39, P = 0.49) showed no significant differences between the groups. No serious complications were reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that this technique was at least as safe and effective as the USG-guided, anesthetist-administered adductor canal catheter.

Addition of Surgeon-Administered Adductor Canal Infiltration to the Periarticular Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on Pain and Early Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the additive effect of surgeon-administered adductor canal infiltration (SACI) over routine periarticular infiltration (PAI) on pain control [morphine consumption and pain score by the visual analog scale (VAS)] and early function [flexion and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test] post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We prospectively randomized 60 patients into 2 groups. Group I patients received the standard PAI, whereas in Group II, the patients received a SACI in addition to the PAI. The total volume of the injected drug and the postoperative pain management protocol were the same for all. The number of doses of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used for breakthrough pain was recorded as PCA consumption. For early function, flexion and the TUG test were used. The VAS score and PCA consumption were compared between the 2 groups by using analyses of variance with post hoc tests as indicated. The TUG test and flexion were compared using Student t tests. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The PCA consumption in the first 6 hours was significantly higher in Group I (P = .04). The VAS at 6 hours was significantly lower in Group II (P = .042). The TUG test was comparable between the 2 groups preoperatively (P = .72) at 24 hours (P = .60) and 48 hours (P = .60) post-TKA. The flexion was comparable between the 2 groups preoperatively (P = .85) at 24 hours (P = .48) and 48 hours (P = .79) post-TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a SACI to PAI provides improved pain relief and reduces opioid consumption without affecting early function post-TKA. A SACI avoids the need for an anesthesiologist or specialized equipment with no added operating time and minimal added cost. We recommend routine use of SACI for all patients undergoing TKA.

Intraoperative Surgeon-Administered Adductor Canal Block Is a Safe Alternative to Preoperative Anesthesiologist-Administered Adductor Canal Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The shift toward outpatient total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) has led to a demand for effective perioperative pain control methods. A surgeon-performed "low" adductor canal block ("low-ACB") technique, involving an intraoperative ACB, is gaining popularity due to its efficiency and early pain control potential. This study examined the transition from traditional preoperative anesthesiologist-performed ultrasound-guided adductor canal blocks ("high-ACB") to low-ACB, evaluating pain control, morphine consumption, first physical therapy visit gait distance, hospital length-of-stay, and complications. METHODS: There were 2,620 patients at a single institution who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, and received either a low-ACB or high-ACB. Cohorts included 1,248 patients and 1,372 patients in the low-ACB and high-ACB groups, respectively. Demographics and operative times were similar. Patient characteristics and outcomes such as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), Visual Analog Scale pain scores, gait distance (feet), length of stay (days), and postoperative complications (30-day readmission and 30-day emergency department visit) were collected. RESULTS: The low-ACB cohort had higher pain scores over the first 24 hours (5.05 versus 4.86, P < .001) and higher MME at 6 hours (11.49 versus 8.99, P < .001), although this was not clinically significant. There was no difference in pain scores or MME at 12 or 24 hours (20.81 versus 22.07 and 44.67 versus 48.78, respectively). The low-ACB cohort showed longer gait distance at the first physical therapy visit (188.5 versus 165.1 feet, P < .001) and a shorter length of stay (0.88 versus 1.46 days, P < .01), but these were not clinically significant. There were no differences in 30-day complications. CONCLUSIONS: The low-ACB offers effective pain relief and comparable early recovery without increasing operative time or the complication rate. Low-ACB is an effective, safe, and economical alternative to high-ACB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III (retrospective cohort study).

Analgesic effectiveness of continuous versus single-injection adductor canal block in addition to continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fracture surgery: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The adductor canal block is a well-known procedure for controlling postoperative pain after medial malleolus fracture surgery. Continuous nerve block is a viable option for blocking pain for a longer period although the literature on this subject is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to compare continuous adductor canal block (cACB) group to single-injection adductor canal block (sACB) group in those with bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures. The procedure was performed in addition to a continuous sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction. METHODS: The study included 57 patients who had bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures and underwent open reduction and internal fixation between August 2016 and June 2018. Each patient received a continuous sciatic nerve block and was divided into two groups: those who received cACB and those who received sACB. Each postoperative pain was scored at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Additionally, the consumption of rescue medications and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: The two groups displayed no disparity in medial side ankle pain at 4 h and 8 h after surgery, but significantly higher pain in the sACB group at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. However, there was no difference in the pain at the lateral side of ankle and consumption of rescue medication. In addition, the cACB group showed more satisfaction than the sACB group did. CONCLUSION: CACB is better than sACB in terms of postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction. cACB can be used for postoperative pain control in ankle fractures involving the medial malleolus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial, Level 2.

Comparative evaluation of functional outcome and pain relief after pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve within and distal to the adductor canal in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind trial.

Background and Aims: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the saphenous nerve (SN) has shown effective pain relief in knee pain because of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The adductor canal (AC) contains other sensory nerves innervating the medial part of the knee joint apart from SN. We compared the PRF of SN within and outside the AC for their quality and duration of pain relief in knee osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (KOA-MC). Material and Methods: We conducted a randomized prospective study in 60 patients with anteromedial knee pain because of KOA-MC. Patients in group A received PRF-SN, and those in group B received PRF-AC. The primary objectives were comparison of pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and changes in quality of daily living by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and OXFORD knee scores. The secondary objectives were comparison of analgesic requirements using Medicine Quantification Scale (MQS) scores and block-related complications. Intra-group comparison was performed by analysis of variance. Inter-group normally distributed data were assessed by Student's t-test, non-normally distributed and ordinal data were assessed by Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical data were assessed by Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in Gr-B at 12 weeks. The WOMAC scores and OXFORD scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks were significantly lower in Gr-B compared to Gr-A. Conclusion: The PRF-AC provides better pain relief and functional outcome than PRF-SN; however, duration of pain relief was not significantly different.

Proximal versus distal adductor canal catheters for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe postoperative pain. Continuous adductor canal blockade provides analgesia while preserving quadriceps muscle strength. Nevertheless, uncertainty still exists as to the optimal adductor canal catheter placement approach. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the analgesic effects of proximal vs distal adductor canal catheters in patients undergoing TKA. SOURCE: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing distal and proximal adductor canal catheters for TKA regarding critical clinical outcomes in adult patients. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the risk of random errors and the uncertainty of our results. The risk of bias was appraised according to the RoB-2 tool. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Six RCTs and 352 patients were included, of whom 151 (42.9%) were male, and 175 (49.7%) were randomized to undergo proximal adductor canal catheter placement. Due to the randomized nature of the studies, baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences between proximal and distal adductor canal catheters regarding cumulative opioid consumption in the first 24 hr (mean difference [MD], -4.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.19 to 5.47; P = 0.36; four RCTs; 240 patients); pain scores at rest (MD, 0.41; 95% CI, -1.23 to 0.40; P = 0.32; six RCTs; 350 patients); and pain scores with movement for the first 24 hr (MD, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.85 to 0.35; P = 0.42; four RCTs; 246 patients). In the TSA, the required information size was not reached, and the Z-curve did not cross the monitoring boundaries in any of the endpoints. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that proximal vs distal adductor canal catheter placement in patients undergoing TKA may be equally effective for the outcomes of opioid consumption in the first 24 hr, pain scores at rest, and pain scores with movement in the first 24 hr. Nevertheless, TSA findings suggest insufficient power to definitively conclude no differences between the two techniques. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022353576); registered 25 August 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG) est associée à une douleur postopératoire majeure. Le bloc continu du canal adducteur procure une analgésie tout en préservant la force musculaire du quadriceps. Néanmoins, il existe encore des incertitudes quant à l'approche optimale de positionnement du cathéter du canal adducteur. Nous avons cherché à réaliser une revue systématique et une méta-analyse d'études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) comparant les effets analgésiques de cathéters proximaux et distaux du canal adducteur chez la patientèle bénéficiant d'une ATG. SOURCES: Nous avons réalisé des recherches systématiques dans les bases de données PubMed, EMBASE et Cochrane pour en tirer les ERC comparant les cathéters distaux et proximaux du canal adducteur pour l'ATG touchant aux critères d'évaluation cliniques critiques chez les patient·es adultes. L'analyse statistique a été réalisée à l'aide de la version R 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienne, Autriche). L'hétérogénéité a été évaluée à l'aide du test Q de Cochran et des statistiques I2. Une analyse séquentielle des études a été réalisée pour évaluer le risque d'erreurs aléatoires et l'incertitude de nos résultats. Le risque de biais a été évalué selon l'outil RoB-2. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Six ERC et 352 patient·es ont été inclus·es, dont 151 (42,9 %) hommes, et 175 (49,7 %) ont été randomisé·es pour bénéficier d'une pose proximale d'un cathéter du canal adducteur. En raison de la nature randomisée des études, les caractéristiques initiales étaient similaires entre les groupes. Il n'y avait aucune différence statistique entre les cathéters proximaux et distaux du canal adducteur en ce qui concerne la consommation cumulative d'opioïdes au cours des premières 24 heures (différence moyenne [DM], −4,86; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −15,19 à 5,47; P = 0,36; quatre ERC; 240 patient·es); les scores de douleur au repos (DM, −0,41; IC 95 %, −1,23 à 0,40; P = 0,32; six ERC ; 350 patient·es); et les scores de douleur en mouvement pendant les premières 24 heures (DM, −0,25; IC 95 %, −0,85 à 0,35; P = 0,42; quatre ERC; 246 patient·es). Dans l'analyse séquentielle des études, la taille d'information requise n'a pas été atteinte et la courbe en Z n'a franchi les limites de surveillance dans aucun des paramètres. CONCLUSION: Ces résultats suggèrent que le positionnement proximal ou distal d'un cathéter du canal adducteur chez les personnes subissant une ATG peut être tout aussi efficace en ce qui touche aux critères de consommation d'opioïdes au cours des premières 24 heures, de scores de douleur au repos et de scores de douleur en mouvement au cours des premières 24 heures. Néanmoins, les résultats de l'analyse séquentielle suggèrent une puissance insuffisante pour conclure de manière définitive à l'absence de différences entre les deux techniques. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42022353576); enregistrée le 25 août 2022.

Comparison of Femoral Nerve Catheter, Adductor Canal Catheter, and Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve catheters are used to provide analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and have been shown to decrease pain and opioid use, to facilitate participation with physical therapy (PT), and to hasten discharge. More recently, pericapsular infiltration using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been employed as an alternative analgesic approach. METHODS: This retrospective study compared outcomes for three analgesic approaches: femoral nerve catheter (FNC), adductor canal catheter (ACC), and intraoperative LB infiltration. The primary outcome was numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 12, 36, and 48 hours, time-to-first opioid, cumulative opioid use, distance walked, and time-to-discharge. RESULTS: Pain scores at 24 hours were significantly lower in both the ACC and FNC cohorts when compared to the LB cohort (3.1 versus 4.6 [P = .017] and 2.4 versus 4.6 [P < .0001]). The ACC and FNC groups did not differ significantly at that timepoint (P = .27). Similar comparisons were found at 12 and 36 hours, while at 48 hours the FNC group was superior. Time to first opioid and opioid consumption favored the ACC and FNC groups. Walking distance favored the ACC group. Both the ACC and LB groups had a faster time-to-discharge than the FNC group. CONCLUSION: Both ACCs and FNCs provided superior analgesia at 24 hours compared to LB, while being equivalent to each other. Pain scores at 12 hours and 36 hours as well as opioid consumption through 48 hours mirrored this finding. Although various differences were found between groups in terms of time-to-first analgesic, walking distance and time-to-discharge, the ACC approach appeared to optimally balance analgesia, ambulation, and time-to-discharge.

Reevaluation of the topographical anatomy of the mid-thigh: A magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging study.

Adductor canal (AC) and sciatic nerve (SN) blockades are commonly used during total knee arthroplasties for postoperative pain control. Medical professionals have begun to utilize single injection combined regional anesthesia methods due to increased patient comfort. In this study, we examined the topographical anatomy of the mid-thigh, which is recommended as the appropriate intervention level for combined AC and SN blockades, in order to provide a safe approach for clinicians. We examined 184 thigh magnetic resonance images (MRI) from 98 patients. We measured the diameter of the mid-thigh, anterior thigh muscle thickness, subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness, and SN depth on the MRIs. We obtained ultrasound (US) images of the vastoadductor membranes (VAM) of 26 volunteers, and measured the vertical distances between the greater trochanter and the adductor tubercle (A) and the greater trochanter and the upper edge of the VAM (B). We then proportioned B to A in order to determine in which part of the thigh the AC was located. The AC was in the distal third of the thigh, and the SN's depth was located in the third quarter of the thigh's diameter. Only the adductor magnus, and no neurovascular structure, was at risk of injury between the AC and the SN. The upper edge of the VAM was 6.5 cm below the mid-thigh, therefore it is not appropriate to suggest performing an AC blockade at mid-thigh. We think that it is safe to perform a combined AC and SN blockade in a single injection in selected patients.

Outcome comparison of femoral nerve block and adductor canal block during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: adductor canal block may cause an unexpected decrease in knee flexor strength at 6 months postoperatively.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve blocks are frequently used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While femoral nerve block (FNB) has been associated with knee extensor strength reduction in the early postoperative period, no consistent view of knee extensor strength several months after ACL reconstruction exists. This study aimed to compare the impact of intraoperative FNB and adductor canal block (ACB) during ACL reconstruction on knee extensor strength at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 108 patients divided into FNB (70 patients) and ACB (38 patients) groups based on their postoperative pain management methods. Knee joint extensor and flexor strength were measured at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, using BIODEX at angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s. From these results, peak torque, limb symmetry index (LSI), peak knee extensor torque (time to peak torque and angle of peak torque), hamstrings-to-quadriceps (HQ) ratio, and amount of work were computed for two-group comparison. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in peak torque, LSI of knee extensor strength, HQ ratio, and amount of work between the two groups. However, maximum knee extension torque at 60°/s occurred significantly later in the FNB than in the ACB group at 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, the LSI of the knee flexor at 6 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the ACB group. CONCLUSIONS: In ACL reconstruction, FNB may delay the time to peak torque for knee extension at 3 months postoperatively, which is likely to improve over the treatment course. In contrast, ACB may result in unexpected loss of knee flexor strength at 6 months postoperatively and should be considered with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Single-injection nerve blocks for total knee arthroplasty: femoral nerve block versus femoral triangle block versus adductor canal block-a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a well-established analgesic technique for TKA. However, it associates quadriceps weakness. Therefore, femoral triangle block (FTB) and adductor canal block (ACB) were proposed as effective alternative motor-spearing techniques. The primary objective was to compare quadriceps muscle strength preservation between FNB, FTB and ACB in TKA. The secondary objective was to analyze pain control and functional outcomes. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blinded RCT. From April 2018 to April 2019, patients who undergo a primary TKA were randomized into three experimental groups: FNB-G1/FTB-G2/ACB-G3. Quadriceps strength preservation was measured as the difference in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (G1, n = 22; G2, n = 26; G3, n = 30) met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients with FNB retained significantly lower baseline MVIC at 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.001), but there were no differences at 24 and 48 h. There were no differences between the groups in functional outcomes at any time point. Patients in the FNB-G1 presented significant lower pain scores at 6 h (p = 0.01), 24 h (p = 0.005) and 48 h (p = 0.01). The highest cumulative opioid requirement was reported in ACB-G3. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing TKA, FTB and ACB preserve quadriceps strength better than FNB at 6 h postoperatively, but there are no differences at 24 and 48 h. Moreover, this early inferiority does not translate to worse functional outcomes at any time point. FNB is associated with better pain control at 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery, while ACB presents the highest cumulative opioid requirement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03518450; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03518450 ; submitted March 17, 2018).

Implementation and Postoperative Management of Continuous Adductor Canal Catheters for Total Knee Arthroplasty to Reduce Surgical Backlog Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Acute Pain Service Nursing Perspective and Educational Resource.

PURPOSE: In response to the surgical backlog created by the COVID-19 pandemic and to spare valuable hospital resources, we developed and implemented a continuous adductor canal catheter (CACC) program for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. CACC's offer superior analgesia, decrease opioid use, and increase patient satisfaction while simultaneously promoting a decreased length of hospital stay and even same day discharges. The implementation of analgesia protocols using continuous peripheral nerve catheters and isometric pumps has been described for other surgical procedures and populations; however, the role of the Acute Pain Service Nurse (APS RN) in the implementation of such a program has not been described. DESIGN: An best practice initiative for TKA patients receiving CACC was developed and implemented for patients recovering both in the hospital and at home. METHODS: We describe the development and implementation of a CACC program for TKA patients in response to the surgical backlog created by the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of the APS RN. We provide a detailed narrative description of our postoperative assessment and experience, and offer practical insights for the postoperative care of these patients. We share the educational resources and assessment tools we developed to ensure consistent, safe, and effective clinical management of CACC patients in the hospital and at home. FINDINGS: CACCs via elastomeric pumps have been shown to offer significant advances to pain control following TKA, decrease opioid use, enable earlier discharge, and improve patient satisfaction, all of which we observed unequivocally in our patients. In our experience, implementation of a daily telephone follow up by an APS RN for discharged TKA patients with a CACC was crucial for patient safety, patient satisfaction, and reducing emergency phone calls and emergency room visits. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate this description will provide an invaluable educational resource for other Acute Pain Service programs as similar outpatient peripheral nerve catheter programs are developed in response to the pandemic.

Pupillary Pain Index Predicts Postoperative Pain but Not the Effect of Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: The pupillary pain index (PPI) allows the evaluation of intraoperative nociception by measuring pupillary reaction after a localized electrical stimulus. It was the objective of this observational cohort study to investigate the pupillary pain index (PPI) as a method to evaluate the fascia iliaca block (FIB) or adductor canal block (ACB) sensory areas during general anaesthesia in orthopaedic patients with lower-extremity joint replacement surgery. Materials and Methods: Orthopaedic patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty were included. After anaesthesia induction, patients received an ultrasound-guided single-shot FIB or ACB with 30 mL and 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine, respectively. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or propofol/remifentanil. The first PPI measurements were performed after anaesthesia induction and before block insertion, the second at the end of surgery. Pupillometry scores were evaluated in the area of the femoral or saphenous nerve (target) and C3 dermatome (control). Primary outcomes were differences between PPIs before and after peripheral block insertion as well as the relationship between PPIs and postoperative pain scores; secondary outcomes were the relationship between PPIs and opioid requirements after surgery. Results: PPI decreased significantly from the first to the second measurement (4.17 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2, p < 0.001 for target; 4.46 ± 2.7 vs. 2.17 ± 2.1, p < 0.001 for control). Control and target measurements did not show significant differences. A linear regression analysis showed that early postoperative pain scores could be predicted with intraoperative piritramide with improved prediction after adding PPI scores, PCA opioids and surgery type. Forty-eight-hour pain scores at rest and in movement were correlated with intraoperative piritramide and control PPI after the PNB in movement and with second-postoperative-day opioids and target PPI scores before block insertion, respectively. Conclusions: While the effect of an FIB and ACB could not be shown with PPI postoperative pain scores due to a large effect of opioids, perioperative PPI was shown to be associated with postoperative pain. These results suggest that preoperative PPI may be used to predict postoperative pain.

Effect of multiple analgesic pathways including local infiltration analgesia, peripheral nerve blocks, and intrathecal morphine for controlling pain after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We questioned whether the triple analgesic pathways procedure via local infiltration analgesia (LIA), peripheral nerve blocks, and intrathecal morphine (ITM) is superior to LIA only for controlling pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This retrospective study included 192 primary TKA patients. Group A (76 patients) received LIA only, Group B (61 patients) had ITM, adductor canal block and LIA, while Group C (55 patients) received ITM, femoral nerve block and LIA. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare visual analog scales (VAS) for pain intensity, total amount of morphine consumption (TMC), angle of knee flexion, and length of hospital stay (LHS). RESULTS: Group A showed significantly higher VAS than Group B at 12 h (4.27 ± 2.70 vs 2.42 ± 2.35) and 18 h (4.24 ± 2.35 vs 2.18 ± 2.02), and significantly higher than Group C at 6 h (3.46 ± 3.07 vs 0.60 ± 1.50), 12 h (4.27 ± 2.70 vs 0.89 ± 1.48), and 18 h postoperative (4.24 ± 2.35 vs 1.82 ± 2.18). However, the VAS of Group C and B converged to equalize with Group A after 12 and 18 h, respectively. The TMC at 48 h postoperative of Group A was higher than that of Group B (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no difference between groups in terms of knee flexion and LHS, except the LHS of Group B was longer than Group A (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Triple analgesic pathways could provide a better initial analgesic profile. However, the pain seems to be rebound after resolution of nerve block and ITM, with potentially longer LHS.

Preliminary experience on systemic effects of perineural dexamethasone sodium phosphate and methylprednisolone acetate through adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: A single center retrospective study.

Background and Aims: Glucocorticoids are commonly utilised as adjuvants to enhance nerve block quality and prolong the analgesic duration. Its systemic effects, after a single-injection adductor canal block (ACB) followed by a continuous infusion, are unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the systemic effects of a single dose of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DEX), or a combination of DEX and methylprednisolone acetate (MPA), on fasting blood glucose (FBG) and white blood cell count (WBC) when administered perineurally via ACB. Material and Methods: A single-center retrospective study on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed and a total of 95 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were divided into three groups based on adjuvants received in ACB: Control group (N = 41) and two treatment groups, DEX group (N = 33) and DEX/MPA group (N = 21). Our primary outcomes were the change of FBG from its preoperative baseline value on postoperative day (POD) 2. The secondary outcomes included change of FBG on POD 0 and POD 1, and change of WBC on POD 0, POD 1, and POD 2. Results: The FBG change from baseline in the DEX group was significantly higher than that in the control group (difference = 14.04, 95% CI: 1.3 to 26.77), P = 0.031) on POD 0. The WBC change from baseline in the DEX/MPA group was statistically significant higher than control on POD 0 (2.62 (1.52 to 3.37), P < 0.0001). No significant differences between DEX and DEX/MPA group were found on any given postoperative days for FBG and WBC. Conclusion: This study provided preliminary safety data on the use of a combination of glucocorticoids with hydrophilic (DEX) and lipophilic (MPA) properties as local anesthetic adjuvants in ACB, which induced similar levels of changes on FBG and WBC as those from both control and DEX alone group.

The effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with distal interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires excellent analgesia while preserving muscle strength. This study aimed to determine the hypothesis that continuous adductor canal block (CACB) combined with the distal interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) block could effectively alleviate the pain of the posterior knee, decrease opioids consumption, and promote early recovery and discharge. METHODS: Patients undergoing unilateral, primary TKA were allocated into group CACB+SHAM (receiving CACB plus sham block) or group CACB+IPACK (receiving CACB plus IPACK block). The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative pain originated from the posterior knee, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, range of motion, ambulation distance, and satisfaction for pain management. RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-severe pain of the posterior knee was lower in group CACB+IPACK than that of the group CACB+SHAM at 4 hours (17.1% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.019), 8 hours (11.4% vs. 45.7%; p = 0.001), and 24 hours (11.4% vs. 34.3%; p = 0.046) after TKA. The VAS scores of the posterior knee were lower in group CACB+IPACK than that of the group CACB+SHAM at 4 hours [2 (2) vs. 3 (2-4); p = 0.000], 8 hours [1 (1, 2) vs. 3 (2-4); p = 0.001], and 24 hours [1(0-2) vs. 2 (1-4); p = 0.002] after TKA. The overall VAS scores were lower in group CACB+IPACK than that of the group CACB+SHAM at 4 hours [3 (2, 3) vs. 3 (3, 4); p = 0.013] and 8 hours [2 (2, 3) vs. 3 (2-4); p = 0.032] at rest and 4 hours [3 (3, 4) vs. 4 (4, 5); p = 0.001], 8 hours [3 (2-4) vs. 4 (3-5); p = 0.000], 24 hours [2 (2, 3) vs. 3 (2-4); p = 0.001] during active flexion after TKA. The range of motion (59.11 ± 3.90 vs. 53.83 ± 5.86; p = 0.000) and ambulation distance (44.60 ± 4.87 vs. 40.83 ± 6.65; p = 0.009) were superior in group CACB+IPACK than that of the group CACB+SHAM in postoperative day 1. The satisfaction for pain management was higher in group CACB+IPACK than that of the group CACB+SHAM [9 (8, 9) vs. 8 (7-9); p = 0.024]. There was no difference in term of cumulative opioids consumption between group CACB+IPACK and group CACB+SHAM [120(84-135) vs. 120(75-135); p = 0.835]. CONCLUSION: The combination of CACB and distal IPACK block could decrease the incidences of moderate-severe posterior knee pain, improve the postoperative pain over the first 24 hours after TKA, as well as promoting recovery of motor function. However, the opioids consumption was not decreased by adding distal IPACK to CACB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR2200059139 ; registration date: 26/04/2022; enrollment date: 16/11/2020; http://www.chictr.org.cn ).

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) provide postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ACB blocks the saphenous nerve and has smaller impacts on quadriceps muscle weakness. ACB theoretically does not have enough analgesic effects on posterior sensory nerves. LIA may increase its analgesic effects on the posterolateral knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ACB combined with a LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and betamethasone has superior analgesic effect than LIA for TKA. METHODS: A total of 86 patients were assessed for eligibility from February 2019 to May 2019. 26 of those were excluded, and 60 patients were divided into 2 groups by computer-generated random number. Group A (LIA group) received LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Group B (LIA+ ACB group) received ultrasound-guided ACB and LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) resting or active pain scores, opioid consumption, range of motion (ROM), functional tests, complications and satisfaction rates were measured. The longest follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Two groups have no differences in terms of characteristics, preoperative pain or function (P > 0.05). ACB combined with LIA had significantly lower resting and active VAS pain scores, better ROM, better sleeping quality and higher satisfaction rates than LIA alone within 72 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Complications, or adverse events and HSS score, SF-12 score were observed no significant differences within 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia provide better early pain control. Although the small statistical benefit may not result in minimal clinically important difference, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia also reduce opioid requirements, improve sleeping quality, and do not increase the complication rate. Therefore, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia still have good application prospects as an effective pain management for total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900021385 , 18/02/2019.

Periarticular Local Infiltrative Anesthesia and Regional Adductor Canal Block Provide Equivalent Pain Relief After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative pain and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients who received an adductor canal block (ACB) or periarticular local infiltrative anesthesia (LIA). METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected ACL registry was performed. Patients underwent ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and September 2020 and received long-acting local anesthesia with a preoperative ultrasound-guided ACB or periarticular LIA after surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) consumed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and total hospital recovery time were compared. Univariate analysis was used to compare VAS pain and MME totals between overall groups and groups propensity score matched for age, sex, body mass index, graft type, and meniscal treatment. Results are presented as mean (95%CI) unless otherwise indicated. RESULTS: There were 265 knees (253 patients) included (LIA, 157 knees; ACB, 108 knees). Overall, VAS pain scores before hospital discharge (LIA: 2.6 [2.4-2.8] vs ACB: 2.4 [2.1-2.7]; P = .334) and total MMEs were similar (LIA: 17.6 [16.4-18.8] vs ACB: 18.5 [17.2-19.8] (MME); P =.134). Median time to discharge also did not significantly differ (LIA: 137.5 [IQR: 116-178] vs. ACB: 147 [IQR: 123-183] (min); P = .118). Matched subanalysis (LIA and ACB; n = 94) did not reveal significant differences in VAS pain before discharge (LIA: 2.4 [2.1-2.7] vs ACB: 2.7 [2.4-3.0]; P = .134) or total MMEs (LIA: 18.6 (17.2-20.0) vs ACB: 17.9 (16.4-19.4); P = .520). CONCLUSION: The use of ACB or LIA resulted in similar early pain levels, opioid consumption, and hospital recovery times after ACLR surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparison study.

Reducing Narcotic Usage With 0.5% Bupivacaine Periarticular Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular injections (PAIs) and adductor canal blocks (ACBs) are widely accepted pain management strategies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, the optimal anesthetic concentration to provide adequate pain relief while avoiding toxicity remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of different anesthetic concentrations for PAI alone and in combination with ACB. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary TKAs between January 2019 and November 2020 included 3 groups: 0.25% PAI (50 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine PAI diluted with 50 cc of saline and ketorolac), 0.5% PAI (50 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 50 cc of saline and ketorolac), and PAI + ACB (ultrasound-guided preoperative anesthesiologist-administered ACB and 0.25% PAI). RESULTS: In total, 368 TKAs were analyzed (123 0.25%, 132 0.5%, and 113 PAI + ACB). Total overall hospital narcotic usage in oral morphine equivalents (OME) was significantly lower for the 0.5% group (120.09 vs 165.26 and 175.75) compared to the 0.25% and PAI + ACB groups, respectively (P < .0001). Cumulative OME for the first 3 shifts was also lower for 0.5% (68.7 vs 83.7 and 76.4) compared to the 0.25% and PAI + ACB groups, respectively (P = .030). Total postoperative narcotics in OME were significantly lower for 0.5% (617.9 vs 825.2 and 1047.6) than 0.25% and PAI + ACB, respectively (P = .0003). Number of prescriptions within 6 weeks postoperatively were also significantly lower for 0.5% (1.7) than 0.25% (2.1) and PAI + ACB (2.4) (P = .0003). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving 0.5% PAI had lower narcotic usage compared to 0.25% PAI or PAI + ACB. ACB may be eliminated without compromising pain control if the dose of local anesthetic in the PAI is sufficiently high.