Comparison of the efficacy of different cell sources for transplantation in total limbal stem cell deficiency.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of allogeneic cultured limbal epithelial transplantation (ACLET) and cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) in treating total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 73 patients (76 eyes) with total LSCD, including 41 patients (42 eyes) treated with ACLET and 32 patients (34 eyes) receiving COMET, were evaluated. The age, gender and injury cause of all patients were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 23.3 ± 9.9 months in the ACLET group and 16.1 ± 5.8 months in the COMET group. A higher incidence of persistent epithelial defect was observed after COMET (P = 0.023). The overall ocular surface grading scores were all lower in the ACLET group than in the COMET group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and the last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated a significantly higher success rate of ACLET (71.4%), compared with that of COMET (52.9%; P = 0.043). The risk of graft failure was higher in patients with entropion and trichiasis, incomplete eyelid closure and treated with COMET. The graft failure risk rate after COMET was 3.5 times higher than that of ACLET. CONCLUSIONS: For total LSCD patients, ACLET should be prioritized, since limbal epithelial cells have better ability to maintain corneal epithelial integrity and ocular surface stability and benefit the ocular surface when compared with oral mucosal epithelial cells. Preoperative and postoperative eyelid abnormalities should be corrected as early as possible.

Midterm outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty following allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation in patients with bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency.

AIM: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) following allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) for bilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). METHODS: Ten patients (10 eyes) with bilateral LSCD were enrolled in this prospective noncomparative case series study. Each participant underwent PK approximately 6mo after a CLET. Topical tacrolimus, topical and systemic steroids, and oral ciclosporin were administered postoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular surface grading scores (OSS), corneal graft epithelial rehabilitation, persistent epithelial defect (PED), immunological rejection, and graft survival rate were assessed. RESULTS: The time interval between PK and allogeneic CLET was 6.90±1.29 (6-10)mo. BCVA improved from 2.46±0.32 logMAR preoperatively to 0.77±0.55 logMAR post-PK (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis of mean graft survival revealed graft survival rates of 100% at 12 and 24mo and 80.0% at 36mo. PEDs appeared in 5 eyes at different periods post-PK, and graft rejection occurred in 4 eyes. The total OSS decreased from 12.4±4.4 before allogeneic CLET to 1.4±1.51 after PK. CONCLUSION: A sequential therapy design of PK following allogeneic CLET can maintain a stable ocular surface with improved BCVA despite the relatively high graft rejection rate.