Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery disease: a clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have demonstrated favourable outcomes following endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease. However, uncertainty remains whether the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can improve the outcomes of DCBs. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, randomized trial, conducted at seven centres in South Korea, compared the outcomes of IVUS-guided vs. angiography-guided angioplasty for treating FPA disease with DCBs. Patients were assigned to receive IVUS-guided (n = 119) or angiography-guided (n = 118) angioplasty using DCBs. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency. RESULTS: Between May 2016 and August 2022, 237 patients were enrolled and 204 (86.0%) completed the trial (median follow-up; 363 days). The IVUS guidance group showed significantly higher primary patency [83.8% vs. 70.1%; cumulative difference 19.6% (95% confidence interval 6.8 to 32.3); P = .01] and increased freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization [92.4% vs. 83.0%; difference 11.6% (95% confidence interval 3.1 to 20.1); P = .02], sustained clinical improvement (89.1% vs. 76.3%, P = .01), and haemodynamic improvement (82.4% vs. 66.9%, P = .01) at 12 months compared with the angiography guidance group. The IVUS group utilized larger balloon diameters and pressures for pre-dilation, more frequent post-dilation, and higher pressures for post-dilation, resulting in a greater post-procedural minimum lumen diameter (3.90 ± 0.59 vs. 3.71 ± 0.73 mm, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound guidance significantly improved the outcomes of DCBs for FPA disease in terms of primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and sustained clinical and haemodynamic improvement at 12 months. These benefits may be attributed to IVUS-guided optimization of the lesion before and after DCB treatment.

Outcomes of Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Endovascular Therapy Alone in Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with direct endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke who present late are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of bridging IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours after time last known well. METHODS: We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6 from 20 centers across 10 countries in the multicenter retrospective CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) between January 2014 and May 2022. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting modeling adjusted for clinical and imaging confounders to compare functional outcomes, reperfusion success, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality between EVT patients with and without prior IVT. RESULTS: Of 5098 patients screened for eligibility, we included 2749 patients, of whom 549 received bridging IVT before EVT. The timing of IVT was not recorded. Witnessed stroke onset and transfer rates were higher in the bridging IVT group (25% versus 12% and 77% versus 55%, respectively, P value for both <0.0001), and time intervals between stroke onset and treatment were shorter (time last known well-start of EVT median 560 minutes [interquartile range, 432-791] versus 724 minutes [interquartile range, 544-912]; P<0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no difference in functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio for modified Rankin Scale shift, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.89-1.19]; P=0.72) or successful reperfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.81-1.75]; P=0.39). There were no safety concerns associated with bridging IVT versus direct EVT (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: adjusted odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.38-1.48]; P=0.40; mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.89-1.46]; P=0.31). Results were unchanged when the analysis was limited to patients who received IVT >6 hours after last known well. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours from last known well, bridging IVT was not associated with a difference in outcomes compared with direct EVT. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

Combining Early Ischemic Change and Collateral Extent for Functional Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy: An Analysis From AcT Trial.

BACKGROUND: Early ischemic change and collateral extent are colinear with ischemic core volume (ICV). We investigated the relationship between a combined score using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and multiphase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) collateral extent, named mCTA-ACE score, on functional outcomes in endovascular therapy-treated patients. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of a subset of endovascular therapy-treated patients from the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase trial which was conducted between December 2019 and January 2022 at 22 centers across Canada. Ten-point mCTA collateral corresponding to M2 to M6 regions of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score grid was evaluated as 0 (poor), 1 (moderate), or 2 (normal) and additively combined with the 10-point Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score to produce a 20-point mCTA-ACE score. We investigated the association of mCTA-ACE score with modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and return to prestroke level of function at 90 to 120 days using mixed-effects logistic regression. In the subset of patients who underwent baseline computed tomography perfusion imaging, we compared the mCTA-ACE score and ICV for outcome prediction. RESULTS: Among 1577 intention-to-treat population in the trial, 368 (23%; 179 men; median age, 73 years) were included, with Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, mCTA collateral, and combination of both (mCTA-ACE score: median [interquartile range], 8 [7-10], 9 [8-10], and 17 [16-19], respectively). The probability of modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and return to prestroke level of function increased for each 1-point increase in mCTA-ACE score (odds ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.28] and 1.22 [95% CI, 1.06-1.40], respectively). Among 173 patients in whom computed tomography perfusion data was assessable, the mCTA-ACE score was inversely correlated with ICV (ρ=-0.46; P<0.01). The mCTA-ACE score was comparable to ICV to predict a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and return to prestroke level of function (C statistics 0.71 versus 0.69 and 0.68 versus 0.64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The mCTA-ACE score had a significant positive association with functional outcomes after endovascular therapy and had a similar predictive performance as ICV.

Arterial Recanalization During Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ischemic stroke harboring a large vessel occlusion admitted to nonendovascular-capable centers often require interhospital transfer for thrombectomy. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of arterial recanalization during transfer, as well as the relationship between interhospital recanalization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 cohorts of patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to a comprehensive center, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on comprehensive stroke center arrival. Interhospital recanalization was determined by comparison of the baseline and posttransfer arterial imaging and was defined as revised arterial occlusive lesion (rAOL) score 2b to 3. Pretransfer variables independently associated with interhospital recanalization were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 520 included patients (Montpellier, France, n=237; Stanford, United States, n=283), 111 (21%) experienced interhospital recanalization (partial [rAOL=2b] in 77% and complete [rAOL=3] in 23%). Pretransfer variables independently associated with recanalization were intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.0-11.6]), more distal occlusions (intracranial carotid occlusion as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.5] for proximal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, 5.1 [95% CI, 2.3-11.5] for distal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, and 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.8] for second segment of the middle cerebral artery), and smaller clot burden (clot burden score 0-4 as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.5-7.6] for 5-7 and 5.6 [95% CI, 2.4-12.7] for 8-9). Recanalization on arrival at the comprehensive center was associated with less interhospital infarct growth (rAOL, 0-2a: 11.6 mL; rAOL, 2b: 2.2 mL; rAOL, 3: 0.6 mL; Ptrend<0.001) and greater interhospital National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score improvement (0 versus -5 versus -6; Ptrend<0.001). Interhospital recanalization was associated with reduced 3-month disability (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.68-3.77]) with greater benefit from complete than partial recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Recanalization is frequently observed during interhospital transfer for thrombectomy and is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, even when partial. Broadening thrombolysis indications in primary centers, and developing therapies that increase recanalization during transfer, will likely improve clinical outcomes.

Randomized Secondary Prevention Trials in Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a prevalent cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. Its association with silent cerebral infarcts and its contribution to cognitive impairment and dementia emphasize the critical need for disease prevention and effective management strategies. Despite extensive research on secondary stroke prevention treatment over the past several decades, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis continues to exhibit a notably higher recurrent stroke rate compared with other causes. This review focuses on randomized secondary prevention trials involving antithrombotic therapy, endovascular treatment, open surgical therapy, and remote ischemic conditioning. It aims to provide an insightful overview of the major findings from each trial and their implications for future research efforts.

Combined Technique for Internal Carotid Artery Terminus or Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions in the ASTER2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the results of a subgroup analysis of the ASTER2 trial (Effect of Thrombectomy With Combined Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever vs Stent Retriever Alone on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion) comparing the safety and efficacy of the combined technique (CoT) and stent retriever as a first-line approach in internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus±M1-middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) and isolated M1-MCA occlusions. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the ASTER2 trial with ICA terminus±M1-MCA and isolated M1-MCA occlusions were included in this subgroup analysis. The effect of first-line CoT versus stent retriever according to the occlusion site was assessed on angiographic (first-pass effect, expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b50, and expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2c grades at the end of the first-line strategy and at the end of the procedure) and clinicoradiological outcomes (24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ECASS-III [European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study] grades, and 3-month modified Rankin Scale). RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two patients were included in the postsubgroup analysis according to the occlusion site: 299 were treated for isolated M1-MCA occlusion (150 with first-line CoT) and 63 were treated for ICA terminus±M1-MCA occlusion (30 with first-line CoT). Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b50 (odds ratio, 11.83 [95% CI, 2.32-60.12]) and expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2c (odds ratio, 4.09 [95% CI, 1.39-11.94]) were significantly higher in first-line CoT compared with first-line stent retriever in patients with ICA terminus±M1-MCA occlusion but not in patients with isolated M1-MCA. CONCLUSIONS: First-line CoT was associated with higher reperfusion grades in patients with ICA terminus±M1-MCA at the end of the procedure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03290885.

Treatment strategy for splenic artery aneurysms and novel classification based on imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) has increased with advances in imaging techniques, necessitating a comprehensive classification to guide treatment strategies. This study aims to propose a novel classification system for SAAs based on aneurysm characteristics and to review treatment outcomes at our center. METHODS: This retrospective study included 113 patients with SAAs admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023, assessed using computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography. A new classification system was devised based on the aneurysm location, morphology, integrity, and parent artery anatomy. Treatment strategies were determined based on these characteristics, with interventions ranging from endovascular therapy to laparoscopic and open surgery. Patients were followed up after the intervention to assess mortality, complications, reinterventions, and aneurysm-related outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort of 113 patients with 127 SAAs had a predominance of female patients (63.7%) and a mean age of 52.7 years. The SAAs were classified into five types, with type I being the most common. The intervention techniques varied across types, with sac embolization, covered stent implantation, and artery embolization being the most frequently used. The overall technical success rate was 94.7%, with perioperative complication and reintervention rates of 25.0% and 0.9%, respectively, and no deaths within 30 days after the intervention. The median follow-up duration was 21 months, with overall complications rate of 3.5% and no aneurysm-related complications or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification system effectively guides the selection of treatment strategies for SAAs, incorporating key anatomical and morphological features. This system facilitated high technical success and low complication rates, underscoring the importance of tailored techniques in managing SAAs.

The addition of a leaded arm sleeve to leaded aprons further decreases operator upper outer quadrant chest wall radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer most commonly occurs in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) chest wall (CW). The effectiveness of routine leaded aprons to protect this region of the body in interventionalists during fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs) is unknown. Given the high lifetime attributable risks of prolonged occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the increasing number of practicing female vascular surgeons and interventionalists, we sought to determine if the use of a leaded arm shield would offer additional protection to the lateral CW and axilla in operators compared with routine leaded aprons. METHODS: Effectiveness of leaded sleeves in attenuating radiation dose to the axilla and UOQ was evaluated in clinical practice and simulated scenarios. In the clinical setting, optically stimulated luminescence nanoDot detectors were placed at the UOQ lateral CW position, both over and under a standard leaded apron vest with and without the addition of an antimony/bismuth Enviro-Lite sleeve on two vascular surgeons performing FGIs. In the simulation, nanoDots were similarly placed on an anthropomorphic phantom positioned to represent a primary operator performing right femoral access. Fluorography was performed on 12-inch-thick acrylic scatter phantom at 80 kVp for an exposure of 3 Gy reference air kerma. Experiments were done with and without the sleeve. Paired Wilcoxon and χ2 tests were performed to identify the statistical significance of radiation attenuation. RESULTS: Operator UOQ CW dose was measured during 61 FGIs: 33 cases (54%) with and 28 cases (46%) without the sleeve. Median procedure reference air kerma and fluoroscopy time was 180 mGy (interquartile range [IQR], 85-447 mGy) and 21 minutes (IQR, 11-39 minutes) when the sleeve was worn vs 100 mGy (IQR, 67-270 mGy) and 11 minutes (IQR, 6.3-25 minutes) without the sleeve. Radiation dose to the operator's UOQ was reduced by 96% (IQR, 85%-96%) when the sleeve was present and by 62% (IQR, 44%-82%; P < .001) without the sleeve. In the simulated setting, the sleeve reduced the radiation dose to the UOQ compared with the apron alone (96% vs 67%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Routine leaded aprons do attenuate the majority of UOQ chest wall radiation dose; however, the addition of a lead-equivalent sleeve further significantly reduces this dose. Because this area of the body has a high incidence of cancer formation, additional protection, especially to female interventionalists, seems prudent. Vascular surgeons should consider using a protective sleeve with their personal protective equipment when performing complex fluoroscopically guided procedures.

Impact of the endovascular revolution on vascular training through analysis of national data case reports.

BACKGROUND: In the last couple of decades, there has been a shift in use of endovascular procedures in vascular surgery. We aim to examine the impact of this endovascular shift on vascular trainees, determine whether the surgical experiences of trainees in the integrated residency and fellowship program changed over time, and identify differences between the two training paradigms. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education National Data Case Logs for the vascular surgery fellowship (1999-2021) and integrated residency (2012-2021) programs. Every procedure was categorized as open or endovascular, then designated into the following subcategories: thoracic aneurysm repairs, cerebrovascular, abdominal aneurysm repairs, venous, vascular access, peripheral arterial disease, visceral, or miscellaneous. We compared the prevalence of open and endovascular cases in the fellowship and integrated residency using data from overlapping years (2012-2021). In addition, we compared the mean number of cases per trainee per year within designated time intervals. The vascular surgery fellowship was grouped into three intervals: 1999 to 2006, 2006 to 2013, and 2013 to 2021; the integrated vascular surgery residency was grouped into two intervals: 2012 to 2017 and 2017 to 2021. Data were standardized to represent the average number of cases per trainee per year. RESULTS: Within the fellowship, we found a 362.37% increase in endovascular procedures (mean, 56.80 ± 32.57 vs 262.63 ± 9.91; P < .001), although there was only a 32.47% increase in open procedures (220.19 ± 4.55 vs 291.68 ± 8.20) between the first and last time intervals. There was a decrease in abdominal aneurysm repair (24.46 ± 7.30 vs 13.85 ± 0.58; P < .001) and visceral (6.41 ± 0.44 vs 5.80 ± 0.42; P = .039) open procedures. For the integrated residency, there was an increase in open procedures by 8.52% (352.18 ± 8.23 vs 382.20 ± 5.84; P < .001). Residents had greater total, open, and endovascular procedures per year than fellows (all P < .001). Chief residents had approximately one-half as many cases as vascular fellows per year. Fellows performed more open abdominal aneurysm repair (14.04 ± 0.80 vs 12.40 ± 1.32; P = .007) and visceral (5.83 ± 0.41 vs 4.88 ± 0.46; P > .001) procedures than residents. Overall, 52% to 53% of cases performed by trainees per year were open procedures in both the fellowship and integrated residency (288.56 ± 12.10 vs 261.27 ± 10.13, 365.52 ± 17.23 vs 319.58 ± 6.62; both P < .001). Within the subcategories, only cerebrovascular, vascular access, and miscellaneous had more open procedures performed per trainee. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgery training has incorporated new endovascular techniques and technologies while maintaining operative training in open procedures. Despite changes in vascular surgery training, trainees are still performing more open procedures than endovascular procedures per year. However, there are evolving deficits in specific types of procedures.

Learning curve of transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry.

OBJECTIVE: With the recent expansion of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage, transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) is expected to play a larger role in the management of carotid disease. Existing research on the tfCAS learning curve, primarily conducted over a decade ago, may not adequately describe the current effect of physician experience on outcomes. Because approximately 30% of perioperative strokes/deaths post-CAS occur after discharge, appropriate thresholds for in-hospital event rates have been suggested to be <4% for symptomatic and <2% for asymptomatic patients. This study evaluates the tfCAS learning curve using Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data. METHODS: We identified VQI patients who underwent tfCAS between 2005 and 2023. Each physician's procedures were chronologically grouped into 12 categories, from procedure counts 1-25 to 351+. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death rate; secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI), 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke/transient ischemic attack (stroke/TIA), and access site complications. The relationship between outcomes and procedure counts was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test and a generalized linear model with restricted cubic splines. Our results were then validated using a generalized estimating equations model to account for the variability between physicians. RESULTS: We analyzed 43,147 procedures by 2476 physicians. In symptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (procedure counts 1-25 to 351+: 5.2%-1.7%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (5.8%-1.7%), 30-day mortality (4.6%-2.8%), in-hospital stroke/TIA (5.0%-1.1%), and access site complications (4.1%-1.1%) as physician experience increased (all P values < .05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 4% until 235 procedures. Similarly, in asymptomatic patients, there was a decrease in rates of in-hospital stroke/death (2.1%-1.6%), in-hospital stroke/death/MI (2.6%-1.6%), 30-day mortality (1.7%-0.4%), and in-hospital stroke/TIA (2.8%-1.6%) with increasing physician experience (all P values <.05). The in-hospital stroke/death rate remained above 2% until 13 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital stroke/death and 30-day mortality rates after tfCAS decreased with increasing physician experience, showing a lengthy learning curve consistent with previous reports. Given that physicians' early cases may not be included in the VQI, the learning curve was likely underestimated. Nevertheless, a substantially high rate of in-hospital stroke/death was found in physicians' first 25 procedures. With the recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage expansion for tfCAS, a significant number of physicians would enter the early stage of the learning curve, potentially leading to increased postoperative complications.

The Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable stent graft as a bridging stent in complex endovascular aortic procedures at 3 years performs better in fenestrations.

OBJECTIVE: Complex endovascular procedures are now recognized as the gold standard treatments for extensive aortic diseases. Bridging stents (covered stents used to couple the aortic graft to the visceral vessels) play a pivotal role, yet there is currently no dedicated device available on the market. The aim of the study was to evaluate the midterm performance of the Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable (VBX) stent graft as a bridging stent for target visceral vessels (TVVs). METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and received the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent between July 2018 and September 2022 were prospectively collected and subsequently analyzed retrospectively. Primary end points included freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reinterventions, both overall and in comparison between branched and fenestrated graft configurations. Secondary end points were overall survival, procedure and TVV-related (in an intent-to-treat basis) technical success, freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak, and freedom from TVV patency loss. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated with a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair using the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent, of whom 47 (74.6%) presented an atherosclerotic aneurysm, 7 (11.1%) a post-dissecative aneurysm, and 9 (14.3%) an anastomotic pseudoaneursym or a type IA endoleak in a previous endovascular aortic repair. Included in the aortic repair were 231 of 243 (95.1%) total visceral vessels. The intraoperative requirement of 13 additional VBX stent grafts determined a TVV-related technical success of 94.4%. The mean follow-up was 26.1 ± 16.4 months. The estimated overall survival at 36 months was 73% ± 7.5%. The estimated rates at 36 months for freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleaks and TVV primary patency were 90.6% ± 3.9% and 99% ± 0.7%, respectively. The estimated rate at 36 months for freedom from TVV instability was 92.1% ± 3% and did not differ between branched and fenestrated configurations, whereas freedom from TVV-related reinterventions was 90.6% ± 3.1% and significantly in favor of fenestrations (69.4% vs 96.8%, P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed fenestrated configuration as a protective factor against TVV-related reinterventions (hazard ratio: 0.079; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.403). CONCLUSIONS: The VBX stent graft proves to be a reliable bridging stent for complex aortic procedures involving both fenestrated and branched endografts. Although immediate results are deemed satisfactory, they favor fenestrations regarding the need of reinterventions through 3 years. The success of the procedure heavily relies on a thorough understanding of the unique characteristics of this stent.

Outcomes following carotid revascularization in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of carotid revascularization in patients with prior carotid artery stenting (CAS) remain understudied. Prior research has not reported the outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients with previous CAS. In this study, we compared the peri-operative outcomes of TCAR, transfemoral CAS (tfCAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with prior ipsilateral CAS using the Vascular Quality Iniatitive. METHODS: Using Vascular Quality Initiative data from 2016 to 2023, we identified patients who underwent TCAR, tfCAS, or CEA after prior ipsilateral CAS. We included covariates such as age, race, sex, body mass index, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, prior coronary artery disease, prior coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention, congestive heart failure, renal dysfunction, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anemia), symptom status, urgency, ipsilateral stenosis, and contralateral occlusion into a regression model to compute propensity scores for treatment assignment. We then used the propensity scores for inverse probability weighting and weighted logistic regression to compare in-hospital stroke, in-hospital death, stroke/death, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/death/MI, 30-day mortality, and cranial nerve injury (CNI) after TCAR, tfCAS, and CEA. We also analyzed trends in the proportions of patients undergoing the three revascularization procedures over time using Cochrane-Armitage trend testing. RESULTS: We identified 2137 patients undergoing revascularization after prior ipsilateral carotid stenting: 668 TCAR patients (31%), 1128 tfCAS patients (53%), and 341 CEA patients (16%). In asymptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with a lower yet not statistically significant in-hospital stroke/death than tfCAS (TCAR vs tfCAS: 0.7% vs 2.0%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-1.05; P = .06), and similar odds of stroke/death with CEA (TCAR vs CEA: 0.7% vs 0.9%; aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.16-3.98; P = .8). Compared with CEA, TCAR was associated with lower odds of postoperative MI (0.1% vs 14%; aOR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.10; P < .001), stroke/death/MI (0.8% vs 15%; aOR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < .001), and CNI (0.1% vs 3.8%; aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.30; P = .002) in this patient population. In symptomatic patients, TCAR had an unacceptably elevated in-hospital stroke/death rate of 5.1%, with lower rates of CNI than CEA. We also found an increasing trend in the proportion of patients undergoing TCAR following prior ipsilateral carotid stenting (2016 to 2023: 14% to 41%), with a relative decrease in proportions of tfCAS (61% to 45%) and CEA (25% to 14%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients with prior ipsilateral CAS, TCAR was associated with lower odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with tfCAS, with comparable stroke/death but lower postoperative MI and CNI rates compared with CEA. In symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with unacceptably higher in-hospital stroke/death rates. In line with the postprocedure outcomes, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of patients with prior ipsilateral stenting undergoing TCAR over time.

Employing magnetic resonance histology for precision chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a notable prevalence of immediate technical failures in percutaneous vascular interventions (PVIs) for complex arterial lesions associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Current imaging modalities present inherent limitations in identifying these lesions, making it challenging to determine the most suitable candidates for PVI. We present a novel preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histology protocol for identifying lesions that might present a higher rate of immediate and midterm PVI failure. METHODS: We enrolled 22 patients (13 females, average age 65.8 ± 9.72 years) scheduled for PVI were prospectively and underwent 3T MRI using ultrashort echo time and steady-state free precession contrasts to characterize target lesions before PVI. Lesions were scored as hard if >50% of the lumen was occluded by hard components (calcium/dense collagen) on MRI in the hardest cross-section. Two readers evaluated MRI datasets. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC)/Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS)/Wound, Ischemia and Foot infection scoring was performed based on intraprocedural angiograms and chart review. The relationship between MRI scoring, TASC/GLASS scoring, and procedural outcomes was investigated using univariate analysis. Midterm follow-up (revascularization and amputation rates) was recorded at 3 and 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Our cohort of 22 patients yielded 40 target lesions. Five lesions were excluded (two for nondiagnostic image quality; three PVIs were ultimately diagnostic only). Six lesions (17%) were scored as hard. MRI-scored hard lesions had a higher proportion of immediate technical failure (hard vs soft 83% [5/6] vs 3% [1/29]; P < .001). Hard vs soft MRI scoring was the only factor significantly associated with immediate PVI technical success (P < .001), as opposed to TASC/GLASS scoring. Both at 3 months and 6 months after PVI, the reintervention rate was significantly higher among those lesions which were scored hard on MRI (3 months hard, 80% vs soft, 16% [P =.011]; 6 months hard, 80% vs soft, 27%; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: MRI histology could be a valuable tool for optimizing PVI patient selection and treatment strategies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after semi-conversion with graft preservation for failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after semi-conversion (open conversion with graft preservation) after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and semi-conversion failure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major systemic complications, endoleak recurrence, reinterventions, and overall survival. METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023421153). All studies reporting the outcomes of semi-conversions for failed EVAR were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. A random effects meta-regression of proportions was conducted using the double arcsine-Tukey transformation, given the frequent zero event rate in the primary outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the review after full text screening. A total of 196 patients underwent semi-conversion at a mean time from EVAR of 47.4 months, 68.9% in an elective setting. Mean age at conversion was 78.1 years, and the main indication was isolated endoleak type II (70.1% of cases). Aortic clamping was not necessary in 92.3% of semi-conversions; the aortic sac was opened in 96.1% of cases; in 93.3% of cases, ligation/suture of one or more culprit arteries were performed; and aortic neck banding was executed in 29.2%. At 30 days from surgery, the pooled mortality and the major systemic complications rates were 5.3% (I2 = 24.9%) and 13.4% (I2 = 54.3%), respectively. At follow-up, endoleak recurred after 12.6% semi-conversions (I2 = 83.2%), and the rate of reinterventions was 7% (I2 = 50.1%); the semi-conversion failure rate was 5.5% (I2 = 54.1%), and the overall survival was 84.6% (I2 = 33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Semi-conversions have acceptable 30-day mortality rates, but the early and mid-term risks of complications, reinterventions, ruptures, and infections are not negligible. This procedure might be an alternative to complete or partial graft explant in patients whom aortic cross-clamping is not ideal.

Comparison of total percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture and chimney technique for left subclavian artery fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of totally percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture for left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration (ISMF) and chimney technique in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients who underwent either chimney-TEVAR (n = 89) or ISMF-TEVAR (n = 113) from October 2018 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and major complications at 30 days and during follow-up. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 84.3% in the chimney group and 93.8% in the ISMF group (p = 0.027). The incidence of immediate endoleakage was significantly higher in the chimney than ISMF group (15.7% vs 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.027). The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the chimney and ISMF groups were 98.9% ± 1.1% vs 98.1% ± 0.9% and 86.5% ± 6.3% vs 92.6% ± 4.1%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.715). The 3-year rate of cumulative freedom from branch occlusion in the chimney and ISMF group was 95.4% ± 2.3% vs 100%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Both ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR achieved satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes for the preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD. ISMF-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes with higher patency and lower reintervention rates. However, ISMF-TEVAR had longer operation times with higher procedure expenses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: When LSA revascularization is required during TEVAR, in situ, fenestration, and chimney techniques are all safe and effective methods; in situ, fenestration-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes, but takes longer and is more complicated. KEY POINTS: LSA revascularization during TEVAR reduces post-operative complication rates. Both in situ ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR are safe and effective techniques for the preservation of the LSA during TEVAR. The chimney technique is associated with a higher incidence of endoleakage and branch occlusion, but ISMF-TEVAR is a more complicated and expensive technique.

Real-World Vein Mapping Practice Patterns Before Endovascular Treatment of Limb Ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: The Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial results suggest that in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and adequate single-segment great saphenous vein (SSGSV) by preoperative duplex ultrasonography, a surgical-first treatment strategy is superior to an endovascular-first strategy. However, the utilization of vein mapping prior to endovascular-first revascularization for CLTI in actual clinical practice is not known. METHODS: Data from a multicenter clinical data warehouse (2008-2019) were linked to Medicare claims data for patients undergoing endovascular-first treatment of infra-inguinal CLTI. Only patients who would have otherwise been eligible for enrollment in BEST-CLI were included. Adequate SSGSV was defined as healthy vein >3.0 mm in diameter from the groin through the knee. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between preprocedure characteristics and vein mapping. Survival methods were used to estimate the risk of major adverse limb events and death. RESULTS: A total of 142 candidates for either surgical or endovascular treatment underwent endovascular-first management of CLTI. Ultrasound assessment for SSGSV was not performed in 76% of patients prior to endovascular-first revascularization. Of those who underwent preprocedure vein mapping, 44% had adequate SSGSV for bypass. Within one year postprocedure, 12.0% (95% confidence interval 7.4-18.0%) of patients underwent open surgical bypass and 54.7% (95% confidence interval 45.3-62.4%) experienced a major adverse limb event or death. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort of BEST-CLI-eligible patients undergoing endovascular-first intervention for infra-inguinal CLTI, three-quarters of patients had no preprocedure ultrasound assessment of great saphenous vein conduit. Practice patterns for vein conduit assessment in the real-world warrant reconsideration in the context of BEST-CLI trial results.

Paradigm Shift of Interventional Strategies and Outcomes for Acute Limb Ischemia Post-Pandemic.

PURPOSE: We performed a large-scale comparison of patients treated for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in the pre-COVID (2017-2019) and COVID (2020-2022) eras to evaluate changes in interventional strategies and compare factors associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to characterize patient outcomes in an evolving ALI treatment algorithm in response to pandemic-associated presentation delays and rapid technological advancements in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a multicenter query across 80 health care organizations (HCOs) spanning 4 countries for patients treated for ALI. Propensity score matching was performed to account for comorbidities. Risk of adverse outcomes within 30 days was calculated for each era, including re-intervention (RI30), major/minor amputation, and death. Patients were then stratified by initial intervention: open revascularization (OR), MT, or catheter-directed thrombolysis and adjunctive endovascular procedures alone (CDT/EP). Risk of adverse outcomes was compared between treatment groups of the same era. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the pre-COVID era and COVID era cohorts included 7344 patients each. COVID era patients experienced a statistically significant higher risk of 30-day mortality (RR=1.211, p=0.027). Mechanical thrombectomy interventions were performed more frequently in the COVID era (RR=1.314, p<0.0001). Comparing outcomes between treatment groups, MT patients required RI30 more than OR patients (pre-COVID: RR=2.074, p=0.006; COVID: RR=1.600, p=0.025). Open revascularization patients had higher 30-day mortality (pre-COVID: RR=2.368, p<0.0001; COVID: RR=2.013, p<0.0001) and major amputations (pre-COVID: RR=2.432, p<0.0001; COVID: RR=2.176, p<0.0001) than CDT/EP. Pre-COVID CDT/EP patients were at higher risk for RI30 (RR=1.449, p=0.005) and minor amputations (RR=1.500, p=0.010) than OR. The MT group had higher major amputation rates than CDT/EP (pre-COVID: RR=2.043, p=0.019; COVID: RR=1.914, p=0.007). COVID-era MT patients had greater 30-day mortality (RR=1.706, p=0.031) and RI30 (RR=1.544, p=0.029) than CDT/EP. CONCLUSION: Significant shifts toward an MT-based approach have been observed in the last 3 years. Although MT required more RI30 than OR, there was no associated consequence of mortality and limb salvage. The increased mortality seen among COVID-era patients could be explained by delayed presentation, as well as poorly understood pro-thrombogenic or pro-inflammatory mechanisms related to the first waves of COVID. More research is necessary to determine an optimal treatment algorithm. CLINICAL IMPACT: Comorbid risk factors and severity of ischemia must be carefully considered before selecting an interventional strategy to prevent adverse outcomes and maximize limb salvage. Open revascularization strategies are associated with increased mortality and limb loss compared to less-invasive thrombolytic therapy alone. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-based approaches have been increasingly used in the last 3 years. Patients receiving MT are more likely to require reintervention within 30 days.

Six-Year Outcomes of Total Arch Replacement vs Debranching With TEVAR for Aortic Arch Pathologies: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Data From Propensity Score-Matched Studies.

BACKGROUND: Total arch replacement (TAR) and debranching plus thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) serve as significant therapeutic options for aortic arch pathologies. It remains unclear whether one of these approaches should be considered preferable. Our study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of these 2 approaches. METHODS: We carried out a pooled meta-analysis of time-to-event data extracted from studies published by December 2023. Eligibility criteria included populations with any aortic arch pathology who underwent debranching plus TEVAR or TAR, propensity score-matched (PSM) studies (prospective/retrospective; single-center/multicentric), and the outcomes included follow-up for overall survival/mortality and/or reinterventions. RESULTS: Eleven PSM studies met our eligibility criteria, including a total of 1142 patients (571 matched pairs). We did not observe any statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause death between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]=1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.91-1.56, p=0.202), but patients who underwent TAR had a significantly lower risk of late aortic reinterventions compared with patients who underwent debranching plus TEVAR (HR=0.38, 95% CI=0.23-0.64, p<0.001). Our meta-regression analyses for all-cause mortality identified statistically significant coefficients for age (coefficient=-0.047; p=0.012) and type A aortic dissections (coefficient=0.012; p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Debranching plus TEVAR and TAR demonstrate no statistically significant differences in terms of survival in patients with aortic arch pathologies, but TAR is associated with lower risk of late aortic reinterventions over time. Although older patients may benefit more from debranching plus TEVAR rather than from TAR, patients with dissections may benefit more from TAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: Although the 2 strategies seem to be equally valuable in terms of survival, total aortic arch replacement (when compared with debranching plus TEVAR to treat patients with aortic arch pathologies) is associated with reduction of late aortic reinterventions over time in patients with and without aortic dissections. However, we should consider debranching plus TEVAR in older patients as it is associated with lower risk of death in this population. The novelty of our study lies in the fact that, instead of comparing study-level effect estimates, we analyzed the outcomes with reconstructed time-to-event data. This offered us the opportunity of performing our analyses with a mathematically appropriate model which consider events and time; however, these findings might be under the influence of treatment allocation bias.

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-First Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Japan.

PURPOSE: To verify the validity of an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)-first strategy for treating patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 2 groups of patients with rAAA who underwent surgical treatment at 3 hospitals in the Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, between January 2007 and September 2016. The open surgical treatment group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent open surgical treatment before January 2012; their data were retrospectively collected from their medical records. The EVAR-first strategy group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent treatment based on the Shonan rAAA protocol (SRAP; the standard protocol-based EVAR-first strategy) in or after February 2012; their data were collected prospectively. The short- and long-term treatment outcomes of both groups were compared. In addition, a risk score-based sensitivity analysis (one-to-one matching) was conducted on both groups using a caliper with 0.2 standard deviations of the score. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with rAAA, the open surgical and EVAR-first strategy groups comprised 53 and 110 patients, respectively (EVAR: 91.8%, open repair: 8.2%). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate differed significantly, being 42% for the open surgery group and 25% for the EVAR-first strategy group (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.97). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 66%, 48%, and 58% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 51%, 66%, and 48% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.072). In a matched cohort analysis (n=50), the 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 22% for the EVAR-first group and 44% for the open surgery group (odds ratio: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.90). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 76%, 76%, and 63% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 48%, 45%, and 45% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The SRAP-based EVAR-first strategy for rAAA yielded significantly better treatment outcomes than the open surgical strategy. These findings suggest that EVAR should be considered the primary treatment option for rAAA, given its potential to reduce early mortality rates. CLINICAL IMPACT: Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data was done to compare treatment outcomes of two groups of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients open surgery and endovascular-aneurysm-repair (EVAR)-first strategy (Shonan ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm protocol). EVAR-first group showed better outcomes: lower 30-day mortality (25% vs. 42%), higher survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Take home Message: The study supports the use of the EVAR-first strategy with the Shonan Protocol for treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan, showing improved outcomes, reduced 30-day postoperative mortality, and better long-term survival rates compared to the conventional approach.

Endovascular Treatment for Renal Vein Embolism by a Renal Calculus After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: This report presents the endovascular strategies adopted to treat a kidney calculus venous embolism after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the versatility of endovascular techniques to manage even the most unexpected renovascular complications after urological intervention. According to the literature available in PubMed, Cochrane, SciELO, and Science.gov repositories, this is the first case to our knowledge of renal vein calculus embolism as a complication of percutaneous treatment of kidney stones. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old woman underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat a left kidney 2.8-cm staghorn calculi. The stone cracked, leaving a residual fragment in the ureteropelvic junction. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 0.9-mm extrarenal calculus located inside the left retroaortic renal vein. Calculus was captured using a basket catheter system through a 6F 45-cm sheath positioned in the left common femoral vein (CFV) and accessed by dissection to safely conclude the calculus extraction by venous cut down. The patient was asymptomatically discharged 48 hours after the endovascular procedure, under a rivaroxaban anticoagulation regimen, with no symptoms or renal function impairment until the 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The endovascular strategy proposed in this case was effective for calculus rescue and venous flow restoration. CLINICAL IMPACT: This case reinforces the adaptability of endovascular therapy in an unexpected scenario. A potentially life-threatening extremely rare adverse event following a common urological procedure could be treated with minimally invasive hybrid treatment, preserving renal function and maintaining venous vascular patency. This report may add a discussion of procedures to manage similar events and bring to the literature a possible strategy to solve the problem.