Race adjustments in clinical algorithms can help correct for racial disparities in data quality.

Despite ethical and historical arguments for removing race from clinical algorithms, the consequences of removal remain unclear. Here, we highlight a largely undiscussed consideration in this debate: varying data quality of input features across race groups. For example, family history of cancer is an essential predictor in cancer risk prediction algorithms but is less reliably documented for Black participants and may therefore be less predictive of cancer outcomes. Using data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, we assessed whether race adjustments could allow risk prediction models to capture varying data quality by race, focusing on colorectal cancer risk prediction. We analyzed 77,836 adults with no history of colorectal cancer at baseline. The predictive value of self-reported family history was greater for White participants than for Black participants. We compared two cancer risk prediction algorithms-a race-blind algorithm which included standard colorectal cancer risk factors but not race, and a race-adjusted algorithm which additionally included race. Relative to the race-blind algorithm, the race-adjusted algorithm improved predictive performance, as measured by goodness of fit in a likelihood ratio test (P-value: <0.001) and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve among Black participants (P-value: 0.006). Because the race-blind algorithm underpredicted risk for Black participants, the race-adjusted algorithm increased the fraction of Black participants among the predicted high-risk group, potentially increasing access to screening. More broadly, this study shows that race adjustments may be beneficial when the data quality of key predictors in clinical algorithms differs by race group.

Maternal history of Alzheimer's disease predisposes to altered serum cholesterol levels in adult offspring.

Controversial findings regarding the association between serum cholesterol levels and Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been identified through observational studies. The genetic basis shared by both factors and the causality between them remain largely unknown. The objective of this study is to examine the causal impact of maternal history of AD on changes in serum cholesterol levels in adult offspring. By retrieving genetic variants from summary statistics of large-scale genome-wide association study of maternal history of AD (European-based: Ncase = 27 696, Ncontrol = 260 980). The causal association between genetically predicted maternal history of AD and changes in serum cholesterol levels in adult offspring was examined using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. Causal impact estimates were calculated using single-nucleotide polymorphisms in both univariable MR (UMR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. Additionally, other approaches, such as Cochran's Q test and leave-one-out variant analysis, were employed to correct for potential biases. The results of UMR presented that genetically predicted maternal history of AD was positively associated with hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.014; 95% CI: 1.009-1.018; p < 0.001), total cholesterol (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.134-1.466; p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein (OR = 1.525; 95% CI: 1.272-1.828; p < 0.001) among adult offspring. Genetic predisposition for maternal history of AD to be negatively associated with high-density lipoprotein (OR = 0.889; 95% CI: 0.861-0.917; p < 0.001). The MVMR analysis remained robust and significant after adjusting for diabetes and obesity in offspring. Sufficient evidence was provided in this study to support the putative causal impact of maternal history of AD on the change of serum cholesterol profile in adult offspring. In clinical practice, priority should be given to the detection and monitoring of cholesterol levels in individuals with a maternal history of AD, particularly in the early stages.

Long-term benefits and harms of early colorectal cancer screening in German individuals with familial cancer risk.

Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) may benefit from early screening with colonoscopy or immunologic fecal occult blood testing (iFOBT). We systematically evaluated the benefit-harm trade-offs of various screening strategies differing by screening test (colonoscopy or iFOBT), interval (iFOBT: annual/biennial; colonoscopy: 10-yearly) and age at start (30, 35, 40, 45, 50 and 55 years) and end of screening (65, 70 and 75 years) offered to individuals identified with familial CRC risk in Germany. A Markov-state-transition model was developed and used to estimate health benefits (CRC-related deaths avoided, life-years gained [LYG]), potential harms (eg, associated with additional colonoscopies) and incremental harm-benefit ratios (IHBR) for each strategy. Both benefits and harms increased with earlier start and shorter intervals of screening. When screening started before age 50, 32-36 CRC-related deaths per 1000 persons were avoided with colonoscopy and 29-34 with iFOBT screening, compared to 29-31 (colonoscopy) and 28-30 (iFOBT) CRC-related deaths per 1000 persons when starting age 50 or older, respectively. For iFOBT screening, the IHBRs expressed as additional colonoscopies per LYG were one (biennial, age 45-65 vs no screening), four (biennial, age 35-65), six (biennial, age 30-70) and 34 (annual, age 30-54; biennial, age 55-75). Corresponding IHBRs for 10-yearly colonoscopy were four (age 55-65), 10 (age 45-65), 15 (age 35-65) and 29 (age 30-70). Offering screening with colonoscopy or iFOBT to individuals with familial CRC risk before age 50 is expected to be beneficial. Depending on the accepted IHBR threshold, 10-yearly colonoscopy or alternatively biennial iFOBT from age 30 to 70 should be recommended for this target group.

Clinical implications of the family history in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature and a new cross-sectional/prospective study design (FAHIC: lung).

Compared to other malignancies, few studies have investigated the role of family history of cancer (FHC) in patients with lung cancer, yielding largely heterogeneous results. We performed a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching the PubMed and Scopus databases from their inception to November 25, 2023, to identify studies reporting on the role of FHC in patients with lung cancer. A total of 53 articles were included, most with a retrospective design and encompassing a variety of geographical areas and ethnicities.Thirty studies (56.6%) assessed patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while 17 studies (32.1%) assessed patients with mixed histologies. Overall, the rates of FHC ranged from 8.3 to 68.9%, and the rates of family history of lung cancer ranged from 2 to 46.8%. Twenty-seven studies investigated FHC as a potential risk factor for lung cancer, with more than half reporting an increased risk for subjects with FHC. Five studies reported on the potential role of FHC in determining clinical outcomes, and twelve studies examined the relationship between FHC and germline mutations. Notably, only one study reported a significantly increased rate of germline mutations, including ATM, BRCA2, and TP53, for patients with a family history of lung cancer compared to those without, but both groups had a low prevalence of mutations (< 1%).The FAHIC-Lung (NCT06196424) is the first cross-sectional/prospective study specifically developed to identify FHC patterns and within-family clusters of other risk factors, including smoking, to guide patients with NSCLC to systematic genetic counseling. Acknowledging the largely heterogeneous results of our systematic review and considering the clinical implications of detecting pathogenic germline variants (PGVs), the FAHIC-lung study aims to identify patients potentially enriched with PGVs/likely PGVs to direct them to germline screening outside of the research setting.

Impact of Family History and Germline Genetic Risk Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Long-Term Outcomes of Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Family history and germline genetic risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been separately shown to stratify lifetime risk of prostate cancer. Here, we evaluate the combined prognostic value of family history of prostate and other related cancers and germline risk SNPs among patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1367 participants from the prospective Health Professionals Follow-up Study diagnosed with low- or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer from 1986 to 2017 underwent genome-wide SNP genotyping. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the association between family history, specific germline risk variants, and a 269 SNP polygenic risk score with prostate cancer‒specific death. RESULTS: Family history of prostate, breast, and/or pancreatic cancer was observed in 489 (36%) participants. With median follow-up from diagnosis of 14.9 years, participants with favorable-risk prostate cancer with a positive family history had a significantly higher risk of prostate cancer‒specific death (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.32, P = .014) compared to those without any family history. The rs2735839 (19q13) risk allele was associated with prostate cancer‒specific death (HR 1.81 per risk allele, 95% CI 1.04-3.17, P = .037), whereas the polygenic risk score was not. Combined family history and rs2735839 risk allele were each associated with an additive risk of prostate cancer‒specific death (HR 1.78 per risk factor, 95% CI 1.25-2.53, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Family history of prostate, breast, or pancreatic cancer and/or a 19q13 germline risk allele are associated with an elevated risk of prostate cancer‒specific death among favorable-risk patients. These findings have implications for how family history and germline genetic risk SNPs should be factored into clinical decision-making around favorable-risk prostate cancer.

The Role of Demographic and Clinical Factors in Germline Mutation Testing for Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommending genetic counseling in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) vary. To further delineate current recommendations, this study examined genetic counseling referral patterns and rates of mutations in surgical patients with PHPT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-institution review was performed of adult patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for presumed sporadic PHPT. Genetic testing indications of hypercalcemia onset ≤ 40 years, multigland disease (MGD), family history (FHx) of PHPT, or other clinical indications suspicious for a PHPT-related endocrinopathy were examined by demographics and mutation detection rates. RESULTS: Genetic counseling was performed in 237 (37.9%) of 625 patients. Counseling was discussed but not performed in 121 (19.4%) patients. No evidence was noted of genetic referral discussion in the remaining 267 (42.7%). Of these groups, patients who received genetic counseling were youngest, p < 0.001 [median age 55.3 (IQR 43.2, 66.7) years]. The majority of patients with indications of age ≤ 40 years (65.7%), FHx (78.0%), and other clinical indications (70.7%) underwent genetic counseling, while most with MGD (57.0%) did not. Eight mutations were detected in 227 patients (3.5%). Mutations included: MEN1 (n = 2), CDC-73 (n = 4), and CASR (n = 2). Detection was most common in patients with FHx (4/71, 5.6%), then age ≤ 40 years (3/66, 4.5%), and other clinical indications (3/80, 3.8%). No mutations were identified in 48 patients tested solely for MGD. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with onset of hypercalcemia age ≤ 40 years, positive FHx, or other clinical concerns underwent genetic counseling, while most with MGD did not. As no germline mutations were identified in patients with MGD alone, further investigation of MGD as a sole indication for genetic counseling may be warranted.

Clinical significance of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) testing and olaparib as maintenance therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is not common in clinical practice. Therefore, factors that efficiently show gBRCA mutations and the real-world outcomes of olaparib maintenance therapy have not been fully established. In the present study, we clarified the indicators for the effective detection of gBRCA mutation and the efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with PC who underwent gBRCA testing (BRACAnalysis, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) at our institute between January 2021 and March 2022. For each patient, clinical data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 y (29-85 y), and 41 patients (48.8%) were male. The gBRCA mutations were identified in 10 (11.9%) patients; two patients had BRCA1 mutation and eight had BRCA2 mutation. All patients with gBRCA mutation had a family history of any cancer, and eight of them had a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)-related cancer. The gBRCA mutation rate was higher for patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer compared to that in patients with PC having a family history of other cancers and no family history of cancer (22.9% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.014). In our study, eight out of 10 patients with gBRCA-positive PC received olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy. The best responses to platinum-based chemotherapy included a complete response in one patient (12.5%) and a partial response in seven patients (87.5%). The median duration of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus olaparib was 17.5 months (8-87 months), and the duration of treatment with olaparib maintenance therapy was 11 months (1-30 months). During olaparib maintenance therapy, three patients showed no disease progression. One of these three patients underwent conversion surgery after receiving olaparib for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The gBRCA testing should be considered proactively, especially in patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer.

Family History of Stroke Is Associated with Large- and Small-Vessel Etiology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the association between family history of stroke (FHS) and stroke etiology, recurrence, or mortality; however, the results have been discrepant. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to further evaluate the associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Scopus database using the term "family history" AND "stroke" up to December 2023 to identify observational studies and systematic reviews reporting both the prevalence of FHS and the rates of stroke etiology or recurrence or mortality. Case reports, series, and narrative reviews were excluded. We used odds ratio (OR) as a common measure of association and I2 to determine heterogeneity of effects across studies. RESULTS: We have identified 22 articles (130,999 patients, 53% female), which met the prespecified inclusion criteria. After pooling the results, FHS was associated with large-vessel (OR, 1.24, 95% CI [1.07-1.44]), as well as small-vessel (OR, 1.17, 95% CI [1.05-1.31]), but not cardioembolic stroke etiology (OR, 0.74, 95% CI [0.60-0.90]). There was no relationship between FHS and stroke recurrence (OR, 1.16, 96% CI [0.84-1.61]), nor mortality (0.94, 95% CI [0.63-1.41]). CONCLUSIONS: FHS is associated with large- and small-vessel stroke etiology, but not stroke recurrence or mortality. These findings might be useful to physicians caring for stroke patients in their everyday practice.

Association of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with gynecologic and breast cancers: a national cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is widely used for the treatment of menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, and for contraception. However, the association between the use of LNG-IUD and the risk of site-specific gynecologic and breast cancers remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: We aim to address this knowledge gap by investigating whether the use of LNG-IUD is associated with a significant risk of site-specific gynecologic and breast cancers. This will be achieved by accessing the nationwide Swedish Registers, with consideration given to the influence and potential interaction of family history of cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 514,719 women aged 18 to 50 years who have used LNG-IUD between July 2005 and December 2018 were identified from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and randomly matched with 1,544,157 comparisons who did not use LNG-IUD at a ratio of 1:3. The propensity score was calculated and matched among women who used LNG-IUD and the matched comparisons. The follow-up period started from the date of the first prescription of LNG-IUD for users as well as for their matched comparisons and ended at the date of diagnosis of gynecologic and breast cancers, date of death from any cause, and the end of the study period, whichever came first. The Cox proportional hazard model with a competing risk analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additive interaction was calculated as the relative excess risk for interaction, while multiplicative interaction was calculated by including a product term in the regression model. RESULTS: The use of LNG-IUD was associated with a 13% higher risk of breast cancer (adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17), a 33% lower risk of endometrial cancer (adjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80), a 14% lower risk of ovarian cancer (adjusted HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99), and a 9% reduced risk of cervical cancer (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) compared to women who did not use LNG-IUD. A significant additive interaction between LNG-IUD use and family history of cancer was observed in breast cancer, indicating a relative 19% excess risk for interaction (P<.002), and 1.63 additional cases per 10,000 person-years. CONCLUSION: The risk of gynecologic and breast cancers exhibits a site-specific effect among LNG-IUD users. It is important to note that the observed effect is small for breast cancer and the results are limited by the observational study design. Clinical recommendations regarding the use of LNG-IUD should carefully weigh its potential benefits and risks. Close monitoring is advisable for the potential development of breast cancer, particularly among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Effect of Family History of Aortic Disease on Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of family history (FH) of aortic disease on the outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR) has not been well described. This study aimed to assess how FH of aortic disease affects outcomes following FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in 10 ongoing, prospective, non-randomised, physician sponsored, investigational device exemption studies to evaluate FB-EVAR (2005 - 2022) in the United States Aortic Research Consortium database. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of FH of any aortic disease in any relative. Patients with confirmed genetically triggered aortic diseases were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events (MAEs) and late survival. Secondary outcomes included late secondary interventions and aneurysm sac enlargement. RESULTS: During the study period, 2 901 patients underwent FB-EVAR. A total of 2 355 patients (81.2%) were included in the final analysis: 427 (18.1%) with and 1 928 (81.9%) without a FH of aortic disease. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and aneurysm extent were similar between the groups. Patients with a FH of aortic disease more frequently had prior open abdominal aortic repair, but less frequently had prior endovascular aneurysm repair (p < .050). There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality (4% vs. 2%; p = .12) and MAEs (12% vs. 12%; p = .89) for patients with or without a FH of aortic disease. Three year survival estimates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67 - 78%) and 71% (95% CI 68 - 74%), respectively (p = .74). Freedom from secondary intervention and aneurysm sac enlargement were also not statistically significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: A FH of aortic disease had no impact on 30 day or midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR of CAAs. In the absence of an identified genetically triggered aortic disease, treatment selection for CAAs should be based on clinical risk and patient anatomy rather than FH of aortic disease.

Familial autoimmunity and risk of developing immune thrombocytopenia and Evans syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and Evans syndrome (ES) are manifestations of immune dysregulation. Genetic variants in immune-related genes have been identified in patients with ITP and especially ES. We aimed to explore familial autoimmunity in patients with ITP and ES to understand possible contributions to chronicity. PROCEDURE: We assessed family history in two ways: via patient report for ITP and ES and by population-based analysis using the Utah Population Database (UPDB) for ITP. A total of 266 patients with ITP and 21 patients with ES were identified via chart review, and 252 of the 266 patients with ITP were also identified in the UPDB. RESULTS: Chart review showed familial autoimmunity in 29/182 (15.9%) and 25/84 (29.8%) of patients with newly diagnosed+persistent (nd+p) ITP and chronic ITP (cITP), respectively, (p = .009). The UPDB analysis revealed that autoimmunity in relatives of patients with nd+pITP was higher than in relatives of controls (odds ratio [OR]: 1.69 [1.19-2.41], p = .004), but was not significantly increased in relatives of patients with cITP (OR 1.10 [0.63-1.92], p = .734). Incomplete family history in medical records likely contributed to the observed discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that familial autoimmunity may have a stronger association with the development of ITP rather than its duration. Twelve (57.1%) patients with ES reported autoimmunity in their relatives. UPDB analysis was omitted due to the small number of patients with ES. The use of population databases offers a unique opportunity to assess familial health and may provide clues about contributors to immune dysregulation features within families.

Family history and gastric cancer incidence and mortality in Asia: a pooled analysis of more than half a million participants.

BACKGROUND: The family history of gastric cancer holds important implications for cancer surveillance and prevention, yet existing evidence predominantly comes from case-control studies. We aimed to investigate the association between family history of gastric cancer and gastric cancer risk overall and by various subtypes in Asians in a prospective study. METHODS: We included 12 prospective cohorts with 550,508 participants in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate study-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between family history of gastric cancer and gastric cancer incidence and mortality, then pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Stratified analyses were performed for the anatomical subsites and histological subtypes. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up of 15.6 years, 2258 incident gastric cancers and 5194 gastric cancer deaths occurred. The risk of incident gastric cancer was higher in individuals with a family history of gastric cancer (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.32-1.58), similarly in males (1.44, 1.31-1.59) and females (1.45, 1.23-1.70). Family history of gastric cancer was associated with both cardia (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.60) and non-cardia subsites (1.49, 1.35-1.65), and with intestinal- (1.48, 1.30-1.70) and diffuse-type (1.59, 1.35-1.87) gastric cancer incidence. Positive associations were also found for gastric cancer mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: In this largest prospective study to date on family history and gastric cancer, a familial background of gastric cancer increased the risk of gastric cancer in the Asian population. Targeted education, screening, and intervention in these high-risk groups may reduce the burden of gastric cancer.

Germline cancer susceptibility in individuals with melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have estimated a small number of individuals with melanoma (2%-2.5%) have germline cancer predisposition, yet a recent twin study suggested melanoma has the highest hereditability among cancers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of hereditary melanoma and characterize the spectrum of cancer predisposition genes that may increase the risk of melanoma. METHODS: Four hundred individuals with melanoma and personal or family history of cancers underwent germline testing of >80 cancer predisposition genes. Comparative analysis of germline data was performed on 3 additional oncologic and dermatologic data sets. RESULTS: Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were identified in 15.3% (61) individuals with melanoma. Most variants (41, 67%) involved genes considered unrelated to melanoma (BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, RAD51C). A third (20, 33%) were in genes previously associated with familial melanoma (BAP1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MITF, TP53). Nearly half (30, 46.9%) of P/LP variants were in homologous repair deficiency genes. Validation cohorts demonstrated P/LP rates of 10.6% from an unselected oncologic cohort, 15.8% from a selected commercial testing cohort, and 14.5% from a highly selected dermatologic study. LIMITATIONS: Cohorts with varying degrees of selection, some retrospective. CONCLUSION: Germline predisposition in individuals with melanoma is common, with clinically actionable findings diagnosed in 10.6% to 15.8%.

Lifetime alcohol use disorder and gambling disorder: clinical profile and treatment response.

OBJECTIVES: Gambling disorder affects 0.5-2.4% of the population and shows strong associations with lifetime alcohol use disorder. Very little is known regarding whether lifetime alcohol use disorder can impact the clinical presentation or outcome trajectory of gambling disorder. METHODS: Data were pooled from previous clinical trials conducted on people with gambling disorder, none of whom had current alcohol use disorder. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between those who did versus did not have lifetime alcohol use disorder. RESULTS: Of the 621 participants in the clinical trials, 103 (16.6%) had a lifetime history of alcohol use disorder. History of alcohol use disorder was significantly associated with male gender (relative risk [RR] = 1.42), greater body weight (Cohen's D = 0.27), family history of alcohol use disorder in first-degree relative(s) (RR = 1.46), occurrence of previous hospitalization due to psychiatric illness (RR = 2.68), and higher gambling-related legal problems (RR = 1.50). History of alcohol use disorder was not significantly associated with other variables that were examined, such as severity of gambling disorder or extent of functional disability. Lifetime alcohol use disorder was not significantly associated with the extent of clinical improvement in gambling disorder symptoms during the subsequent clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight that lifetime alcohol use disorder is an important clinical variable to be considered when assessing gambling disorder because it is associated with several untoward features (especially gambling-related legal problems and prior psychiatric hospitalization). The study design enabled these associations to be disambiguated from current or recent alcohol use disorder.

Neural response to threat and reward among young adults at risk for alcohol use disorder.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is heritable. Thus, young adults with positive family histories represent an at-risk group relative to those without a family history, and if studied at a time when both groups have similar levels of alcohol use, it provides an opportunity to identify neural processing patterns associated with risk for AUD. Previous studies have shown that diminished response to potential reward is associated with genetic risk for AUD, but it is unclear how threat may modulate this response. We used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task during fMRI to examine neural correlates of the interaction between threat and reward anticipation in a sample of young adults with (n = 31) and without (n = 44) family histories of harmful alcohol use. We found an interaction (p = 0.048) between cue and group in the right nucleus accumbens where the family history positive group showed less differentiation to the anticipation of gaining $5 and losing $5 relative to gaining $0. The family history-positive group also reported less excitement for trials to gain $5 relative to gaining $0 (p < 0.001). Family history-positive individuals showed less activation in the left insula during both safe and threat blocks compared to family history-negative individuals (p = 0.005), but the groups did not differ as a function of threat (p > 0.70). Young adults with, relative to without, enriched risk for AUD may have diminished reward processing via both neural and behavioural markers to potential rewarding and negative consequences. Neural response to threat may not be a contributing factor to risk at this stage.

Family History of Twinning and Fertility Traits in Nigerian Mothers of Dizygotic Twins.

Familial twinning and fertility traits were investigated in Nigerian mothers of dizygotic (DZ) twins (MoDZT; N = 972) and controls (N = 525) who responded to our person-to-person interview, which included questions on pregnancy history and family history of DZ twinning. Controls were defined as women who are not twins themselves and do not have twins in their first-degree relatives. Over 95% of the participants were Yoruba. We found that Nigerian MoDZT had an average of 4.0 (±2.6) pairs of twins among their relatives, and of these, the prevalence of DZ twins was significantly higher than that of monozygotic (MZ) twins (45.9% vs. 25.8%). Controls had an average of 0.5 (±0.4) pairs, and over 95% of the controls had no twins in their relatives. These results suggest genetic influences on DZ twinning in Nigerians. MoDZT were significantly younger in their mean age at first child, and had higher parity than controls, suggesting increased fertility in MoDZT. As compared to mothers with a single set of twins, mothers (N = 130) with multiple sets had significantly more twins among their relatives (5.4 pairs vs. 3.7 pairs) and had their first twins at a younger age (28.4 vs. 30.7 years), indicating that mothers with multiple sets of twins might have higher genetic propensity for twinning associated with earlier age at twin pregnancy. Our findings argue for genomewide association studies for DZ twinning in Nigerians, and may help to develop intervention strategies to overcome infertility/subfertility problems.

The Intergenerational Transfer of Mental Disorders: A Population-Based Multigenerational Linkage Study: Le transfert intergénérationnel des troubles mentaux : une étude sur les liens multigénérationnels basée sur la population.

OBJECTIVES: The aetiology of mental disorders involves genetic and environmental factors, both reflected in family health history. We examined the intergenerational transmission of multiple mental disorders from parents and grandparents using population-based, objectively measured family histories. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study used administrative healthcare databases in Manitoba, Canada and included adults living in Manitoba from 1977 to 2020 with linkages to at least one parent and one grandparent. Index date was when individuals turned 18 or 1 April 1977, whichever occurred later. Mental disorder diagnoses (mood and anxiety, substance use and psychotic disorders) were identified in individuals, parents and grandparents from hospitalization and outpatient records. Cox proportional hazards regression models included sociodemographic characteristics, individual's comorbidity and mental disorder history in a grandparent, mother and father. RESULTS: Of 109,359 individuals with no mental disorder prior to index date, 47.1% were female, 36.3% had a mental disorder during follow-up, and 90.9% had a parent or grandparent with a history of a mental disorder prior to the index date. Both paternal and maternal history of a mental disorder increased the risk of the disorder in individuals. Psychotic disorders had the strongest association with parental history and were mostly influenced by paternal (hazards ratio [HR] 3.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.99 to 4.64) compared to maternal history (HR 2.23, 95% CI, 1.89 to 2.64). Grandparent history was independently associated with the risk of all mental disorders but had the strongest influence on substance use disorders (HR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Parental history of mental disorders was associated with an increased risk of all mental disorders. Grandparent history of mental disorders was associated with a small risk increase of the disorders above and beyond parental history influence. This three-generation study further highlights the need for family-based interventional programs in families affected by mental disorders. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY TITLE: The Intergenerational Transfer of Mental Illnesses.

ObjectivesBoth genetics and environmental factors, such as poverty, maltreatment and parental education, have a role in the development of mental illnesses. Some genetic and environmental risk factors for mental illnesses are shared within families. We conducted a large study to test the extent to which mental illnesses are passed down through generations.MethodsThis study used healthcare data from Manitoba, Canada captured during the delivery of healthcare services for administrative purposes. These data included all adults from 1977 to 2020 who had at least one parent and one grandparent with linked data. Mental illnesses were diagnosed in individuals, parents and grandparents by doctors during hospitalizations or physician visits. The illnesses included mood and anxiety, substance use, and psychotic illnesses. We estimated the likelihood of developing a mental illness when parents and/or grandparents had a mental illness as well.ResultsThe study included 109,359 individuals; a third developed a mental illness during the study period. The majority had a history of a mental illness in a parent or grandparent. We found that a history of mental illness in a mother and father increased the chance of developing the illness. Psychotic illnesses had the strongest relation with parental history. In particular, having a father with a psychotic illness increased the chance of developing the illness by four times. The likelihood of developing a mental illness was higher if a grandparent had a mental illness, above and beyond parental history influence, particularly for substance use disorders.ConclusionsHaving a parent or grandparent with a mental illness increases an individual's chance of developing a mental illness. Family-based intervention programs are needed to support families affected by mental illnesses in coping with their heavy burden.

The interaction of perfluoroalkyl acids and a family history of diabetes on arthritis: analyses of 2011-2018 NHANES.

Whether a family history of diabetes (FHD) and exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) are correlated with an increased risk of developing arthritis remains unclear. This cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the correlations between FHD or exposure to PFAAs and arthritis as well as their interaction using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). In total, 6,194 participants aged ≥ 20 years from the 2011-2018 NHANES were enrolled. PFAAs are a cluster of synthetic chemicals, including perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS). FHD was evaluated using self-reported questionnaires. Arthritis was classified into three types, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), and others, which were diagnosed using questionnaires. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to test the correlation between FHD and arthritis. To examine the joint effects of PFAAs and FHD on arthritis, interaction terms were applied in the GLM. Arthritis incidence was 26.7% among all participants. FHD was associated with both RA [OR = 1.70 (95% CI: 1.15-2.50)] and other types of arthritis [OR = 1.62 (95% CI: 1.21-2.16)]. However, the relationship between FHD and OA was not significant after adjustment (P = 0.18). Interaction outcomes indicated that higher PFDA levels increased the association between FHD and arthritis. FHD is associated with an increased incidence of arthritis, which may be increased by PFDA. Given the heavy burden of arthritis, preventive measures for arthritis and reduction of PFAAs exposure for patients with FHD are required.

Exploring determinants of sex and family history-based disparity in type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence among clinical patients.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus represents a multifaceted disorder characterized by intricate pathophysiological mechanisms, encompassing diminished insulin secretion, augmented hepatic glucose production, and heightened insulin resistance. This study aims to assess the sex (Male and Female only) and family history-based differences in the prevalence of T2DM and explore the determinants contributing to this disparity among clinical patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study encompassed a diverse pool of clinical patients, encompassing both individuals with diabetes and those without the condition, who had previously sought medical attention for clinical checkups at healthcare centers. The collected data included essential parameters such as blood pressure, weight, height, smoking habits, educational background, and physical activity levels. To ensure methodological rigor and data accuracy, blood pressure measurements adhered to the stringent guidelines set forth by the World Health Organization. RESULTS: Participants of the present study reported diabetes, among which notable findings emerged regarding health indicators. It was observed that the prevalence of high blood pressure, obesity, and high blood cholesterol exhibited a statistically significant increase among the female participants, underscoring the sex-based disparities in these health parameters. The male population aged 60 or older, the presence of a family history of DM accentuated this risk, resulting in a striking 3.1 times higher prevalence compared to females, who exhibited a 2.4 times higher risk (OR = 2.4, p = 0.0008). This intriguing relationship between diabetes and cholesterol levels was not limited to sex. Both male (OR = 2.47) and female (OR = 2.1) diabetes patients displayed highly significant associations with cholesterol levels. The risk of T2DM was significantly associated with triglycerides in both sexes (1.58 times higher in males, and 1.71 times higher in females). CONCLUSIONS: The significance of hypertension as a comorbidity in T2DM, highlighting sex-specific associations and the potential impact of a family history of diabetes on blood pressure. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering lipid profiles, obesity, and their sex-specific associations when assessing and managing diabetes risk. Comprehensive diabetes care should include strategies for lipid control, weight management, and cardiovascular risk reduction, tailored to the individual's sex and specific risk profile.

Family History of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Association with Beta Cell Function and Lipid Profile in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the associations between a family history of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and beta-cell function, as well as lipid profile, in pediatric patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on children under 14 years of age who were newly diagnosed with T1D at the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University between August 2018 and August 2022. Clinical features, metabolic profiles, beta-cell function, and lipid profile were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 316 children were diagnosed with new-onset T1D. Among them, 28.2% had a family history of T2D. Patients with T1D who had a family history of T2D experienced a later onset of the disease (p = 0.016), improved HOMA2-%B levels (p = 0.003), and increased concentrations of HDL-C (p = 0.005). In addition, no statistically significant differences in age at onset, HOMA2-%B levels, or HDL-C were found when assessing the interaction between family history of T2D and type of diabetes mellitus (autoimmune T1D/idiopathic T1D). CONCLUSION: A family history of T2D may contribute to the heterogeneity of T1D patients in terms of HOMA2-%B levels and lipid profile. This highlights the significance of taking into account T2D-related factors in the diagnosis and treatment of T1D.