Clinical Investigation of Large Volume Subcutaneous Delivery up to 25 mL for Lean and Non-Lean Subjects.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility and tolerability of large volume subcutaneous delivery at different injection depths for lean and non-lean subjects. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, subject-blinded, crossover study in 62 healthy subjects was conducted to evaluate delivery of a 10-cP solution containing hyaluronic acid. Subjects were separated into lean and non-lean cohort by SC thickness. A syringe pump was used to study the effect of different volumes (5, 12, 25 mL) of a viscous placebo solution and needle lengths (6, 9 and 12 mm) delivered at 0.5 mL/min. RESULTS: Across all treatments, injection sites were observed to have negligible leakage, ~34 kPa of back pressure, and VAS of mild pain with higher pain from needle insertion than during injection. While mild to moderate erythema was the most frequently reported ISR and edema was most prominent for 25 mL injections, all ISRs were resolved within 4 hours post injection. Subjects were unbothered by ISRs across all treatments and rated them as low distress scores (average 1.0-1.5 out of 6). CONCLUSION: SC injection of 25 mL is feasible and tolerable using a low-pain formulation for abdomen injection irrespective of subcutaneous thickness and injection depths at a delivery rate of 0.5 mL/min.

Pegylated interferon beta-1a (Plegridy) Italian real-world experience: a Delphi analysis of injection-site reaction and flu-like symptom management.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy) offers the advantage of a prolonged half-life with less-frequent administration and a higher patient adherence. However, the use of an interferon may lead to flu-like symptoms (FLS) and injection-site reactions (ISR) that results in drug discontinuation. The objective of this Delphi analysis was to obtain consensus on the characteristics and management of FLS/ISR of peginterferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting MS based on real-world clinical experiences.4 METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists and nurses identified issues regarding the features and management of adverse events and generated a questionnaire used to conduct three rounds of the Delphi web survey with an Italian expert panel (54 neurologists and nurses). RESULTS: Fifty-three (100%), fifty-one (96.22%), and forty-two (79.24%) responders completed questionnaires 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Responders reported that, during the first 6 months of treatment, FLS generally occurred 6-12 h after injection; the fever tended to resolve after 12-24 h; otherwise, FLS lasted up to 48 h. FLS improved or disappeared after 6 months of treatment in most cases. Paracetamol was recommended as the first choice for managing FLS. Erythema was the most common ISR and usually resolved within 1 week after injection. Responders reported that the adherence to treatment increases after adequate patient education on the drug's tolerability profile. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education and counseling play a key role in promoting adherence to treatment especially in the first months also in patients switching from nonpegylated IFNs to peginterferon beta-1a.

An update on Peginterferon beta-1a Management in Multiple Sclerosis: results from an interdisciplinary Board of German and Austrian Neurologists and dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: Interferon (IFN) beta drugs have been approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) for more than 20 years and are considered to offer a favourable benefit-risk profile. In July 2014, subcutaneous (SC) peginterferon beta-1a 125 µg dosed every 2 weeks, a pegylated form of interferon beta-1a, was approved by the EMA for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS and in August 2014 by the FDA for RMS. Peginterferon beta-1a shows a prolonged half-life and increased systemic drug exposure resulting in a reduced dosing frequency compared to other available interferon-based products in MS. In the Phase 3 ADVANCE trial peginterferon beta-1a demonstrated significant positive effects on clinical and MRI outcome measures versus placebo after one year. Furthermore, in the ATTAIN extension study, sustained efficacy with long-term treatment for nearly 6 years was shown. MAIN TEXT: In July 2016, an interdisciplinary panel of German and Austrian experts convened to discuss the management of side effects associated with peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon beta-based treatments in MS in daily practice. The panel was composed of experts from university hospitals and private clinics comprised of neurologists, dermatologists, and an MS nurse. In this paper we report recommendations regarding best practices for adverse event management, focussing on peginterferon beta-1a. Injection site reactions (ISRs) and influenza-like illness are the most common adverse effects of interferon beta therapies and can present a burden for MS patients leading to non-adherence and discontinuation of therapy. Peginterferon beta-1a shows improved pharmacological properties. In clinical trials, the adverse event (AE) profile of peginterferon beta-1a was similar to other interferon beta formulations. The most common AEs were mild to moderate ISRs, influenza-like illness, pyrexia, and headache. Current information on the underlying cause of skin reactions associated with SC interferon treatment, and the management strategies for these AEs are limited. In pivotal trials, ISRs were mainly characterized and classified by neurologists, while dermatologists were only rarely consulted. CONCLUSIONS: This report addresses expert recommendations on the management of most relevant adverse effects related to peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon betas, based on literature and interdisciplinary experience.

Long-term safety and tolerability of aripiprazole lauroxil in patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with the long-acting antipsychotic aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) were evaluated in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, phase 3, 52-week safety study of 2 fixed doses of AL (441 mg or 882 mg intramuscular every 4 weeks). Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) including akathisia, injection-site reactions (ISRs), and clinically relevant changes in metabolic and endocrine values. RESULTS: Of 478 patients entering this study, 236 (49%) continued from a previous 12-week, phase 3 efficacy study of AL, and 242 (51%) were newly enrolled. Overall, 77% and 23% of patients received AL 882 mg (N = 368) and 441 mg (N = 110), respectively. AEs occurred in 50.4% of patients; most were mild (28.7%) or moderate (18.2%). The most common AEs were insomnia (8.4%) and increased weight (5.0%). Akathisia was reported as an AE in 3.8% of the overall population, with higher rates in patients initiating AL on study entry than those continuing on AL. EPS-related AEs occurred in 9.4% of patients, and AEs related to metabolic parameters were reported in 4.6% of patients. Weight gain was minimal (0.8 kg), and no clinically relevant changes were observed for metabolic parameters. The overall incidence of ISRs was 3.8%; most were associated with the initial injections in patients receiving their first injection in this study. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with AL is generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of oral aripiprazole. It is a suitable option for patients with schizophrenia.

Injection site reactions with the use of biological agents.

Injection site reactions (ISRs) are a local phenomenon defined as a constellation of symptoms, including swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the site of injection. This article reviews the different aspects of ISRs, including their epidemiology and pathogenesis, and provides practical guidance to diagnose and treat such reactions. More focus is given to food and drug administration (FDA)-approved biological agents and biosimilars, which are licensed mainly for the treatment of dermatological conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and chronic urticaria. ISRs are major complications of all FDA-approved self-injectable biological agents, both in adults and children, with studies showing an incidence rate of 0.5-40%. The article emphasizes that ISRs are not correlated with drug efficacy or development of antidrug antibodies. Therefore, misunderstanding of the pathophysiology of the ISRs, most of them not being allergic or immunogenic reactions, might result in unnecessary discontinuation of the treatment. Almost all local reactions to subcutaneously administered biological agents can be prevented by changing the injection techniques, patient education, and training.

Injection site reactions after long-term subcutaneous delivery of drisapersen: a retrospective study.

A retrospective study in which we reviewed the hospital files of a subset of 7 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy participating in the open-label phase I/II PRO051-02 study in Leuven. The objective of this study was to describe in detail the injection site reactions in these children treated with drisapersen (PRO-051), a 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate RNA antisense oligonucleotide, that induces exon 51 skipping in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Antisense oligonucleotides, restoring the reading frame by skipping of exons, have become a potential treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other monogenetic diseases. Erythema followed by hyperpigmentation, fibrosis, and calcification were seen at the injection sites in all children. Ulcerations, which were difficult to heal, occurred in 5 of 7 children. Progression still occurred after switching to intravenous administration of drisapersen or even after stopping therapy. Systemic reactions included a reversible proteinuria and α1-microglobulinuria. Moreover, hypotrichosis was a common feature.Conclusion: Subcutaneous administration of drisapersen causes severe and progressive injection site effects. What is known: • Antisense oligonucleotides offer the possibility to convert Duchenne muscular dystrophy to the less severe Becker type. This can potentially be achieved by targeting and skipping specific exons of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene to restore the disrupted reading frame and to induce the production of a semi functional dystrophin protein. • Drisapersen is such an antisense oligonucleotides which can be administered subcutaneously. Its use has been tested extensively in the escalating dose pilot study (PRO051-02). What is new: • This report describes the injection site reactions caused by this type of agent in detail which has never been done before. We therefore reviewed the hospital files of 7 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy participating in the phase I/II open-label, escalating dose pilot study (PRO051-02) with drisapersen. • Severe side effects starting with erythema, hyperpigmentation, and later fibrosis, calcification, and difficult to treat ulcerations developed in all patients, and these continued to progress even after cessation of drisapersen. We discuss some possible underlying mechanisms. The exact mechanism however is still not known.

[Suprapubic Nicolau syndrome following subcutaneous injection of glatiramer acetate]. / Dermite livédoïde de Nicolau sus-pubienne après injections sous-cutanées d'acétate de glatiramère.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous glatiramer acetate, commercialized under the name of Copaxone®, is licensed for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Its major adverse effects are skin reactions at the injection site. Nicolau syndrome is a rare but serious iatrogenic accident. Herein we report a case seen in a setting of change of dosage and administration rate of Copaxone®. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 64-year-old woman, treated since 2010 with daily sub-cutaneous injections of Copaxone® 20mg/L, reported the appearance of a painful, indurated and erythematous plaque in the suprapubic area following changeover to 40mg/mL injections three times weekly. The suprapubic injections were continued and ugly greyish spots with stellate purpuric borders appeared. Fournier gangrene was ruled out by means of a soft tissue scan. DISCUSSION: We report this latest case of Nicolau syndrome to alert readers to the non-exceptional nature of this complication associated with use of glatiramer acetate, particularly at a dosage of 40mg/L injections three times weekly. In our case, onset of Nicolau syndrome appears to have been favored by continued injection in areas already showing inflammation. Re-injection of the drug in these areas should thus be proscribed.

An Innovative Needle-free Injection System: Comparison to 1 ml Standard Subcutaneous Injection.

A needle-free delivery system may lead to improved satisfaction and compliance, as well as reduced anxiety among patients requiring frequent or ongoing injections. This report describes a first-in-man assessment comparing Portal Instruments' innovative needle-free injection system with subcutaneous injections using a 27G needle. Forty healthy volunteer participants each received a total of four injections of 1.0 mL sterile saline solution, two with a standard subcutaneous injection using a 27G needle, and two using the Portal injection system. Perception of pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Injection site reactions were assessed at 2 min and at 20-30 min after each injection. Follow-up contact was made 24-48 h after the injections. Subject preference regarding injection type was also assessed. VAS pain scores at Portal injection sites met the criteria to be considered non-inferior to the pain reported at 27G needle injection sites (i.e., upper 95% confidence bound less than +5 mm). Based on a mixed effects model, at time 0, accounting for potential confounding variables, the adjusted difference in VAS scores indicated that Portal injections were 6.5 mm lower than the 27G needle injections (95% CI -10.5, -2.5). No clinically important adverse events were noted. Portal injections were preferred by 24 (60%) of the subjects (P = 0.0015). As an early step in the development of this new needle-free delivery system, the current study has shown that a 1.0-mL saline injection can be given with less pain reported than a standard subcutaneous injection using a 27G needle.

Long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with severe cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Anakinra is approved for the treatment of RA and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS). While the anakinra safety profile is well established in RA, the long-term safety profile in severe CAPS is less well documented and will therefore be discussed in this report. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, single centre, clinical cohort study was conducted at the National Institutes of Health in the USA, from 2003 to 2010, investigating the efficacy and safety of anakinra treatment for up to 5 years in 43 patients with CAPS. Safety was evaluated using adverse event (AE) reports, laboratory assessments, vital signs and diary reports. RESULTS: In total, 1233 AEs were reported during the study, with a yearly rate of 7.7 AEs per patient. The event rate decreased over time, and dose escalation during the study did not affect AE frequency. Anakinra had similar safety profiles in adults and children. The most frequently reported AEs were typical CAPS disease symptoms such as headache and arthralgia. Injection site reactions occurred mainly during the first month of anakinra treatment. In total, 14 patients experienced 24 serious AEs (SAEs), all of which resolved during the study period. The most common types of SAEs were infections such as pneumonia and gastroenteritis. There were no permanent discontinuations of treatment due to AEs. CONCLUSION: In this study anakinra treatment of patients with severe CAPS for up to 5 years was safe and well tolerated both in paediatric and adult patients, with most AEs emerging during the first months after treatment initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00069329.

COMPARE: Pharmacokinetic profiles of subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a and subcutaneous interferon beta-1a over 2 weeks in healthy subjects.

AIM: Subcutaneous (s.c.) peginterferon beta-1a injected once every 2 weeks and s.c. interferon beta-1a injected three times per week (Rebif®) have demonstrated efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but direct comparisons of pharmacological activity and tolerability between the two products are lacking. COMPARE was an open label, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study evaluating drug exposure and the safety and tolerability of s.c. peginterferon beta-1a and s.c. interferon beta-1a, over 2 weeks in healthy subjects. METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects received one dose of peginterferon beta-1a (125 µg s.c.) or six doses of interferon beta-1a (44 µg s.c.) over 2 weeks, followed by the alternate treatment after a 2 week washout period. Drug concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and PK parameters including cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-336h ) over 2 weeks and maximum observed serum concentrations (Cmax ) were estimated using a non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: The PK analysis population comprised 26 subjects for each treatment. Drug exposure (AUC0-336h ) was 60% higher with s.c. peginterferon than with s.c. interferon beta-1a (117.4 ng ml(-1) h, 95% confidence interval 95.6, 144.3 vs. 73.1 ng ml(-1) h, 95% confidence interval 61.2, 87.3, respectively; P < 0.0001). Injection-site reactions (ISRs) were the most common adverse events (AEs) observed with both treatments. Numerically lower frequencies and incidence rates of ISRs, headache, myalgia and chills were observed with s.c. peginterferon beta-1a. CONCLUSIONS: One dose of s.c. peginterferon delivered significantly greater drug exposure than s.c. interferon beta-1a three times a week over 2 weeks, and a lower frequency of AEs.

Interferon Beta-1a (AVONEX®) as a Treatment Option for Untreated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (AXIOM): A Prospective, Observational Study.

The efficacy and safety of first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has been demonstrated in pivotal, randomized trials, but these studies do not reflect the routine care setting where treatment gaps or switches are common. The Avonex as Treatment Option for Untreated MS Patients (AXIOM) trial assessed the efficacy of newly-initiated intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFNb-1a) after a treatment-free interval, with particular consideration of the previous course of disease and therapy. The AXIOM trial was an open, 12-month, observational, non-interventional study with a retrospective and a prospective part conducted in Germany. RRMS patients with a treatment-free interval of at least three months were included and treated with IFNb-1a for up to 12 months. Relapse rate, disability progression, injection-related parameters and quality of life observed during the prospective part were compared with retrospectively-collected data. Two hundred and thirty five RRMS patients participated in AXIOM. The mean relapse rate decreased from 1.1 in the three months before baseline to 0.2 per quarter during the twelve-month observational period; the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score improved during twelve months of IM IFNb-1a treatment, while the Expanded Disability Status Scale score did not change over the course of this study. Compared to previous DMTs (IM IFNb-1a, subcutaneous IFNb-1a (SC IFNb-1a), SC IFNb-1b, glatiramer acetate), the patients experienced less injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms, with a stated improved quality of life. IM IFNb-1a was effective and well accepted in RRMS patients with no or discontinued previous therapy. These results from the routine care setting may inform optimization of DMT treatment in RRMS, but need confirmation in further studies.

Injection site reactions resulting from the use of biological therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Biological medications have significantly improved the prognosis of psoriasis patients. All biological drugs (except infliximab) for psoriasis require subcutaneous (SC) administration. Adverse events of biologic drug treatment include injection site reactions. ISRs are a local phenomenon characterized by swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the injection site. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a review to analyze the differences between the ISRs of various biologics approved for psoriasis. Specifically, the review focused on anti-TNF-α, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 drugs. EXPERT OPINION: Etanercept and adalimumab have reported ISR rates of 37% and 20%, respectively, with erythema, pruritus, pain, and irritation being the most common. Citrate free (CF) solution and thinner needles have reduced ISR associated with adalimumab. Ustekinumab showed a low risk of ISR. Regarding secukinumab and ixekizumab, pain was found to be the most common ISR. The introduction of CF ixekizumab formulation has shown promise in reducing ISRs associated with ixekizumab. The risk of ISR appears insignificant with bimekizumab, brodalumab, and anti-IL23 drugs, with ISR rates ranging from less than 1% to 7.1%. The choice of biologic agent should consider ISR risk. Education on injection techniques and the use of single-dose autoinjectors/pens can mitigate ISR risk.

Risk Factors of Ixekizumab-Induced Injection Site Reactions in Patients with Psoriatic Diseases: Report from a Single Medical Center.

Ixekizumab (Taltz®) is a humanized anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of various inflammatory diseases including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Despite the favorable efficacy and safety, ixekizumab is also known for its high incidence of injection site reactions (ISRs), ranging from 6% to 55% in different studies according to different definitions and studied population. However, specific risk factors for ixekizumab-induced injection site reactions in patients with psoriatic diseases had not been well studied. In this retrospective study, we found that overweight or obesity might be a protective predictor for the occurrence of ixekizumab-induced ISRs in patients with psoriatic disease. Meanwhile, having a positive family history of psoriasis might be a potential risk factor. Last but not least, patients with diarrhea following ixekizumab injection were associated with a higher risk of developing ISRs. Future high-quality studies with larger samples are warranted to verify the relationship.

Injection Site Reactions Before and After Intramuscular Injection Technique Revision: A Postmarketing Analysis of NALDEBAIN® From 2017 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: The NALDEBAIN® has been available since 2017, and high incidence of injection reactions in the phase 3 study has been reported. Since the first year in the market, the injection site reactions were still the majority of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in pharmacovigilance reports. The new intramuscular (IM) instruction and package was introduced in the middle of 2018. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the pharmacovigilance data and published postmarketing studies to investigate the impact of IM injection-related reactions in Taiwan between the period of 2017-2022. METHODS: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) and ADRs were classified by system organ class and preferred term. The reporting rate of ICSRs was used to evaluate the impact of the new IM instruction and package. RESULTS: A total of 37 ICSRs were identified from pharmacovigilance reports. Among them, 51% of IM injection-related reactions were reported after one single dose of NALDEBAIN administration. The reporting rate of IM injection-related reactions in pharmacovigilance data dropped from 125.00 to 3.56 per ten thousand exposures after IM instruction and package revision in 2018. In addition, the percentage of IM injection-related reactions also reduced in postmarketing studies from 27.5% to 4.5%. There were no serious IM injection-related reactions found in the pharmacovigilance and postmarketing dataset. CONCLUSION: Injection site reactions were common after intramuscularly administered oil-based agents during the first year which is later markedly reduced by changing the length of the needle and injection education.

Injections Site Reactions and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Questionnaire Based Real Life Study.

Background: Biologic selection for psoriasis treatment should take into account numerous factors including injection site reactions (ISRs) such as swelling at the injection site, pain, burning, erythema, all possibly reducing patient adherence. Methods: A 6-months observational real life study was performed involving psoriasis patients. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, moderate-to-severe psoriasis diagnosis since at least 1 year, patients being on biologic treatment for psoriasis ≥ 6 months. A 14-item questionnaire was administered to all patients enrolled to assess whether the patient ever experienced ISRs after the injection of the biologic drug. Results: 234 patients were included: 32.5% received an anti-TNF-alpha drug, 9.4% received anti-IL12/23, 32.5% received an anti-IL17, 25.6% received an anti-IL23. 51.2% of study population reported at least one symptom related to ISR. 35.9% of patients experienced pain, 31.6% swelling, 28.2% burning sensation and 17.9% erythema. 3.4% of the surveyed population experienced anxiety or fear of the biologic injection due to ISRs symptoms. The greater incidence of pain was registered in anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17 groups (47.4% and 42.1%, p<0.01). Ixekizumab proved to be the drug with the highest rate of patients experiencing pain (72.2%), burning (77.7%) and swelling (83.3%). No patients reported biologics discontinuation or delay for ISRs symptoms. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that each different class of biologics for psoriasis was linked to ISRs. These events are more frequently reported with anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17.

A Blast From the Past: Abdominal Wall Amyloidosis Due to Enfuvirtide Injections.

Enfuvirtide was the first marketed fusion inhibitor that worked by binding to glycoprotein 41 of the HIV envelope, preventing the conformational changes required for HIV fusion with CD4+ T cells. Due to its novel mechanisms of action, it was frequently used in the past as part of regimens for the indication of multi-class-resistant HIV until newer oral agents emerged. Here, we describe the case of a 40-year-old man who used enfuvirtide injections from 2012 to 2017 inclusive for multi-class-resistant HIV until he presented in 2021 with an abscess overlying a right lower quadrant mass requiring drainage via pigtail. Congo red stain of the tissue showed positive apple green birefringence on amorphous material after polarization, enabling the diagnosis of enfuvirtide-induced amyloidosis. The patient experienced significant improvement following surgical excision of the cysts and nodules. This case demonstrates that sequelae of injection site reactions can persist for many years following the cessation of enfuvirtide injections.

Injection Site Reactions with Long-Term Pegcetacoplan Use in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Brief Report.

INTRODUCTION: Pegcetacoplan is a targeted complement component 3 (C3) therapy approved for adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH; US) or PNH plus anemia despite C5-targeted therapy for ≥ 3 months (EU). Patients with PNH receiving pegcetacoplan in the phase 3 PEGASUS trial who experienced injection site reactions (ISRs) mostly experienced mild events. We evaluated ISR incidence and severity with longer-term treatment in the PEGASUS cohort of the Study 307 open-label extension (307 OLE). METHODS: Patients from PEGASUS enrolled in the 307 OLE continued pegcetacoplan subcutaneous self-administration twice or three times weekly or every 3 days for an additional 48 weeks. ISRs were coded as adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and summarized by MedDRA System Organ Class and Preferred Term. RESULTS: As of August 27, 2021, 58/64 patients from PEGASUS completed an additional 48 weeks of treatment in the 307 OLE (median treatment duration 337.0 [range 55-344] days); 95.3% (61/64) of patients achieved compliance ≥ 80%. ISRs occurred in 9/64 (14.1%) patients in the 307 OLE, which was lower than observed at PEGASUS completion (20/77; 26.0%). Most patients with ISRs in the 307 OLE had events with a maximum severity of mild (7/9 patients; 77.8%). Injection site erythema and induration were the most common overall (4/64 patients each; 6.3%) and pegcetacoplan-related (3/64 patients each; 4.7%) ISRs. The exposure-adjusted rates of these events were each 6.5 per 100 patient-years. No ISRs were classified as severe or serious TEAEs or led to drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Though ISRs were common, most were mild, and the percentage of patients reporting ISRs declined from PEGASUS through the 307 OLE. Patient compliance remained high, and no patients discontinued because of ISRs, suggesting that ISRs do not pose a barrier to long-term pegcetacoplan treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03500549 (PEGASUS) and NCT03531255 (307 OLE).

A Study to Describe the Pattern of Cutaneous Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines (Covishield and Covaxin).

Background: Vigorous administration of COVID-19 vaccines to tackle the ongoing pandemic has led to increasing research on adverse effects including both systemic and cutaneous. Objective: A prospective observational study to delineate the cutaneous adverse effects of two vaccines, namely Covishield and Covaxin, administered in two doses in northern India. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in northern India wherein patients were asked to report voluntarily any cutaneous adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination to the dermatology department. The data were collected using excel sheets and later analyzed taking into consideration the age, vaccine types, and duration of onset of adverse effects. Results: Of the 19,672 vaccination jabs, 296 (1.5%) developed cutaneous adverse effects of which the incidence was higher in Covishield vaccine group compared to Covaxin vaccine group. The incidence of side effects was more with the first dose of either vaccine compared to the second dose. All the side effects were benign and were managed symptomatically or were self-limiting. Limitations: The number of vaccine recipients was limited and there was a considerable overlap of adverse effects with both vaccines. Voluntary reporting of cases is not an accurate representation of the scale of patients with adverse effects. Conclusion: Rampant administration of vaccines along with widespread advertisement of vaccine-induced side effects via social media has created apprehension in the general population. This warrants studies improving awareness about the most vital preventive measure available to halt and eventually end the COVID-19 pandemic.

Delayed Skin Reactions to COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Vaccine: Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was granted emergency use authorization (EUA) on December 18, 2020. Some patients experienced a transient, pruritic rash at the injection site, which was referred to as "COVID arm". It is considered a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction and occurs mostly in individuals after vaccination with the Moderna vaccine but rarely with other mRNA vaccines. CASE SUMMARY: A healthy 33-year-old woman with no history of disease or long-term medication presented with fever and rash on the left upper arm three days after her first vaccination with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna). RESULTS: After treatment with antihistamines, all lesions gradually resolved over the following 4 to 5 days. CONCLUSION: We report a case of "COVID arm": a localized erythematous rash surrounding the injection site that arose three days after the first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Delayed injection site reactions occurred in approximately 0.8% of vaccinated people after the first dose and in approximately 0.2% after the second dose. The lesions persisted for several days and then resolved without treatment. Health care providers were not prepared to address these delayed local reactions to the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Given the scale-up of mass vaccination campaigns worldwide, these skin reactions may likely generate concerns among patients and requests for evaluation. Although these skin reactions have not been consistently recognized, guidance regarding the second dose of the vaccine has varied, and many patients have unnecessarily received antibiotic agents.