Effects of ospemifene on overactive bladder in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a complex and multifactorial syndrome associated with urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence. The menopause-associated hormonal changes play a role in the development of this condition. Vaginal estrogens are effective in improving OAB in postmenopausal women (PMW) with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator licensed for the treatment of VVA. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ospemifene on OAB symptoms in PMW with VVA. METHODS: Forty PMW suffering from OAB and VVA received oral ospemifene (60 mg/day) for 12 weeks. All patients were assessed with a urodynamic study, a 3-day bladder diary and validated questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-UI SF] and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder [ICIQ-OAB]) at enrollment and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Cytometric capacity, bladder compliance and verbal sensory threshold responses during bladder filling were improved after treatment. The voiding diary showed a significant reduction of daily voids, urge urinary incontinence episodes and nocturnal events. The median overall scores of the ICIQ-UI and ICIQ-OAB were also significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggest that treatment with ospemifene in PMW suffering from OAB is associated with a reduction of OAB symptoms due to a decreased bladder sensitivity and with an improvement in quality of life.

Sequential treatment in vulvovaginal atrophy.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic and progressive disease that affects sexuality and quality of life. VVA is preventable and treatable, but requires long-term and often sequential treatment. Sequential treatment consists of designing a strategy that uses one or more medications for a long enough time to achieve the desired benefits with minimal risk and maximum adherence. Currently available therapeutic options consist of topical over-the-counter products (including non-hormonal lubricants and moisturizers applied to the vagina), systemic hormone therapy and estrogens, and prescribed vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). In addition, we have a selective estrogen receptor modulator, ospemifene, and new energy-based treatments (laser and radiofrequency). There are clear differences between the treatments both in the mechanism of action and in the efficacy. Compliance is very low, and patients complain about the use of the vaginal route, often due to its low efficacy, or express fear of the long-term use of estrogens or the price of the treatments. We believe that, as a first option, and for physiological, preventive and efficacy reasons, we should consider the prescription of treatments that work on estrogen receptors. As a second option, there are vaginal moisturizers, which are effective on symptoms but do not prevent or improve conditions. Finally, techniques using heat, which although each time represent a clearer alternative, but on the other hand are the cost and the long-term safety data, give us a third option. Of course, we consider that vulvar moisturizers and lubricants can be used at any time.

Non-hormonal treatments for managing vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

The demand for non-hormonal therapies for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is increasing due to an increasing number of patients surviving long term post cancer diagnosis, as well as increased public knowledge of the symptoms of menopause and availability of non-hormonal therapies. Treatment options are wide-ranging and encompass different formulations and methods of application. This review summarizes the key characteristics of the main forms of these therapies, as well as considering the current evidence for each of them and where future clinical studies should be directed. Care for VVA may be in primary care, or under gynecology or oncology. Further research requirements include the need for long-term data as well larger randomized controlled trials into alternatives where vaginal estrogen cannot be used as first-line treatment. Widespread education of health-care providers and patients on VVA and the impact on quality of life is urgently needed, as well as increased use of non-hormonal methods in routine clinical practice.

Satisfaction and medication adherence in women with vulvovaginal atrophy: the CRETA.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the self-reported satisfaction of Spanish postmenopausal women currently treated for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) symptoms. METHODS: The CRETA (CRoss sectional European sTudy on Adherence) is a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in 29 public and private hospitals in Spain, which enrolled postmenopausal women receiving treatment with ospemifene, local hormone therapy (HT) or vaginal moisturizers for VVA. After the prior informed consent of the patients, sociodemographic and treatment perception data were collected using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 752 women who completed the survey, the satisfaction score was significantly higher for the group treated with ospemifene (mean 8.3 ± 1.4) compared with the local HT group (7.2 ± 1.7) and the vaginal moisturizer group (6.5 ± 2.1) according to a 10-point Likert scale (p < 0.0001). Compared to vaginal moisturizers and local HT, participants treated with ospemifene reported the highest adherence (96.7% vs. 70.2% and 78.6%, respectively) and the lowest number of missed doses in the last month (0.6 ± 1.3 standard deviation [SD] vs. 3.5 ± 4.3 SD and 2.0 ± 2.8 SD, respectively) (p < 0.0001). Ospemifene was significantly perceived as easy to use (83.9% vs. 44.9% and 58.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001), efficacious in reducing the time to relieve symptoms (17.1% vs. 7.0% and 6.7%, p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006, respectively) and convenient for sexual life (53.1% vs. 25.6% and 42.3%, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0234, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among postmenopausal women with VVA, treatment with ospemifene has the most positive perceptions and the highest overall satisfaction level and could be an optimal therapeutic approach, maximizing patient adherence.

Expert opinion on the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy with ospemifene based on new evidence.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated chronic condition resulting in physiological and histological changes in the genitourinary tract of postmenopausal women. Treatment of moderate to severe VVA includes local estrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and oral ospemifene, a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). Due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) safety concerns classically associated with the SERM class, and as part of its original marketing authorization approval (MAA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requested the performance of a 5-year post-authorization safety study (PASS) to study the incidence rate of VTE among women receiving ospemifene. The results have led to important regulatory changes to ospemifene's labeling, extending its indication and eliminating concerted risk management measures. A panel of experts discussed and reached consensus on the impact of these regulatory changes on clinical practice, reflecting on the reassurance of ospemifene's benefit-risk balance and recommending its positioning as a first-line pharmacological treatment option for moderate to severe VVA together with local therapies. In a scenario where different treatments present similar efficacy and safety profiles, a shared decision between clinician and patient, according to her needs and preferences over time, is fundamental to improve adherence and persistence with sequential treatment, contributing to the achievement of health outcomes.

Vulvovaginal atrophy in the CRETA study: the healthcare professionals' perception.

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to assess the perception of gynecologists regarding patients' adherence to vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) treatments, to evaluate the gynecologists' opinions on what their patients think about treatment adherence, and to compare the gynecologists' opinions with the patients' own perceptions within the CRETA study. METHODS: Spanish gynecologists who participated in the CRETA study were asked to fill out an online 41-item questionnaire to evaluate their views on VVA management. RESULTS: From 29 centers across Spain, 44 gynecologists completed the survey. Their mean age was 47.2 years old, two-thirds of them were women, and the average professional experience was over 20 years. According to the gynecologists, the therapy most frequently used by VVA-diagnosed women was vaginal moisturizers (45.5%), followed by local estrogen therapy (36.4%) and ospemifene (18.2%). Nevertheless, ospemifene was viewed as the therapeutic option with the most efficacy, easiest route of administration, shorter time to symptom improvement, lower percentage of dropouts, and higher treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Spanish gynecologists are in general agreement with their patients regarding VVA treatment preferences and the main issues for adherence and effectiveness. However, there is an opportunity for doctor-patient communication improvement. Among the three therapeutic options evaluated, ospemifene is regarded as offering some competitive advantages.

Vaginal health, endometrial thickness and changes in bone markers in postmenopausal women after 6 months of treatment with ospemifene in real clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess vaginal health, endometrial thickness, and changes in bone markers in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) treated with 60 mg/day of ospemifene under routine clinical practice. METHODS: The AYSEX study is a Spanish observational and prospective study performed in one center in which 5 gynecologists recruited postmenopausal women with VVA in routine clinical practice treated continuously with ospemifene 60 mg/day for 12 months as an appropriate therapeutic option. This article refers to the 3- and 6-months analysis. Vaginal health was assessed by pH and using Vaginal Health Index (VHI) at baseline and 3 months later. Endometrial thickness, measured by vaginal ultrasonography, and bone resorption marker (CTx) were assessed at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: A total of 100 postmenopausal women cytologically and clinically diagnosed with VVA were included in the study. After 3 months of treatment with ospemifene, pH improved from 6.1 to 4.5 (p < .0001), and VHI improved from 10 to 19 points (p < .0001). The percentage of patients with VVA according to VHI decreased from 100% to 5.2% (p < .0001). After 6 months, mean CTx levels decreased from 0.42 pg/ml at baseline to 0.37 pg/ml 6 months later (p = .0018), and mean endometrial thickness changed from 2.24 to 2.15 mm (p = .6066). CONCLUSIONS: Up to date, this is the only prospective and observational study with ospemifene in routine clinical practice conditions and confirms the results previously reported from randomized controlled clinical trials, improving VVA, not increasing endometrial thickness, and decreasing CTx levels by exerting an anti-resorptive function.

Long-term use of ospemifene in clinical practice for vulvo-vaginal atrophy: end results at 12 months of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the improvement in vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) of postmenopausal women treated with oral ospemifene 60 mg/day under conditions of routine clinical practice after 12 months of follow-up. METHODS: The AYSEX study is a Spanish observational, prospective, and unicentric study in which five gynecologists recruited postmenopausal women with VVA in routine clinical practice treated with oral ospemifene 60 mg/day as an appropriate therapeutic option. Vaginal health, the most bothersome symptoms, sexual health, endometrial safety, bone resorption markers, bone densitometry, mammography, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 12 months using appropriate scales. RESULTS: A total of 100 postmenopausal women cytologically and clinically diagnosed with VVA were included in the study. After 3 months of treatment with ospemifene, a significant improvement was observed in all domains of Vaginal Health Index. This improvement was maintained at month 12 and only one patient remained with vaginal atrophy. In addition, a significant improvement was observed in the most bothersome symptoms, sexual function, and quality of life. There was no significant change in endometrial thickness, mammography, and bone health during the 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study in routine clinical practice conditions confirms the results previously reported by randomized controlled trials, including a significant improvement in VVA, sexual function, quality of life, endometrial safety, and satisfaction with the treatment.

Management of Hypertension with Female Sexual Dysfunction.

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in hypertension has been less studied than male sexual dysfunction, and antihypertensive agents' impact on female sexual function is not defined. In this review, randomized double-blind clinical trials and cross-sectional studies related to female sexual function in hypertension were analyzed from 1991 to 2021. FSD appeared to be higher in hypertensive women than in normotensive women. Beta-blockers are the only antihypertensive agents with relatively strong evidence of damaging the female sexual function. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are relatively beneficial to female sexual function. To treat FSD in the presence of hypertension, controlling blood pressure is key, and the administration of angiotensin receptor blockers is preferred. In addition to controlling blood pressure, for premenopausal women, flibanserin and bremelanotide can be tried, while ospemifene and hormone supplements are preferred for postmenopausal women.

Ospemifene in clinical practice for vulvo-vaginal atrophy: results at 3 months of follow-up of use.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ospemifene 60 mg/day in vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) in postmenopausal women under conditions of routine clinical practice after 3 months of follow-up. METHODS: The AYSEX study is a Spanish observational, prospective, and unicentric study in which 5 gynecologists recruited postmenopausal women with VVA in routine clinical practice treated with ospemifene 60 mg/day as an appropriate therapeutic option. Vaginal health, sexual health, dryness, dyspareunia, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment were assessed at baseline and after three months using validated scales. RESULTS: A total of 100 postmenopausal women cytologically and clinically diagnosed with VVA were included in the study. After 3 months of treatment with ospemifene, vaginal health index increased and vaginal pH, dryness, and dyspareunia decreased significantly (p < .0001). A significant improvement was observed in sexual function and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study in routine clinical practice conditions confirms the results previously reported by randomized controlled trials, including a significant improvement in VVA, sexual function, quality of life, and satisfaction with the treatment.

Management of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: recommendations of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a best practice document for the management of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). METHOD: Literature review carried out using clinical terms, treatments or interventions and comorbidity related to VVA. RESULTS: There is a wide variety of interventions that may produce temporal benefits for VVA. However, there are significant limitations in scientific publications concerning VVA and related issues, including variable outcome evaluations, variability in population age range, and small, often underpowered sample sizes. Therapeutic management of VVA should follow a sequential order, considering women's age, symptoms, general health as well as treatment preference. Beneficial options include lubricants, moisturizers, vaginal estrogens (estradiol, estriol, promestriene, conjugated estrogens), androgens, prasterone, and laser application. In women with general menopausal symptoms who are candidates for systemic hormone therapy, the lowest effective dose should be used. Oral ospemifene is an effective selective estrogen receptor modulator to treat VVA. Systemic androgens have a limited role. Although laser procedures are commonly used, at this moment the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease does not endorse its use out of the setting of clinical trials. Pelvic floor muscle training improves blood flow and elasticity of the vulvovaginal tissue. In breast cancer survivors, moisturizers and lubricants are first line therapy. However, limited absorption of low/ultra-low doses of estrogens suggests safety, especially in women under treatment with aromatase inhibitors. As clinical practice and available preparations vary between countries this text should be adapted to local circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of therapeutic options to individualize VVA treatments.

Guideline No. 422b: Menopause and Genitourinary Health.

OBJECTIVE: Provide strategies for improving the care of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women based on the most recent published evidence. TARGET POPULATION: Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Target population will benefit from the most recent published scientific evidence provided via the information from their health care provider. No harms or costs are involved with this information since women will have the opportunity to choose among the different therapeutic options for the management of the symptoms and morbidities associated with menopause, including the option to choose no treatment. EVIDENCE: Databases consulted were PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library for the years 2002-2020, and MeSH search terms were specific for each topic developed through the 7 chapters. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: physicians, including gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, internists, emergency medicine specialists; nurses, including registered nurses and nurse practitioners; pharmacists; medical trainees, including medical students, residents, fellows; and other providers of health care for the target population. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 422b : Ménopause et santé génito-urinaire.

OBJECTIF: Proposer des stratégies fondées sur les plus récentes données publiées pour améliorer les soins aux femmes ménopausées ou en périménopause. POPULATION CIBLE: Les femmes ménopausées ou en périménopause. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La population cible bénéficiera des plus récentes données scientifiques publiées communiquées par leurs fournisseurs de soins de santé. Aucun coût ni préjudice ne sont associés à cette information, car les femmes seront libres de choisir parmi les différentes options thérapeutiques, y compris le statu quo, pour la prise en charge des symptômes et morbidités associés à la ménopause. DONNéES PROBANTES: Les auteurs ont interrogé les bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE et Cochrane Library pour extraire des articles publiés entre 2002 et 2020 en utilisant des termes MeSH spécifiques à chacun des sujets abordés dans les 7 chapitres. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: gynécologues, obstétriciens, médecins de famille, internistes, urgentologues, infirmières (autorisées et praticiennes), pharmaciens, stagiaires (étudiants en médecine, résidents, moniteurs cliniques) et autres fournisseurs de soins de santé pour la population cible. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaginal carbon dioxide laser therapy compared with standard medical therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia.

BACKGROUND: Topical vaginal estrogen therapy is considered the gold standard treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia, but early investigations of energy-based devices show promise for patients with contraindications or those who are refractory to vaginal estrogen cream therapy. Although evaluating safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for novel technologies is critically important when new technologies become available to treat unmet healthcare needs, evaluation of the costs of these new technologies compared with existing therapies is also critically important but often understudied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, including vaginal estrogen therapy, oral ospemifene therapy, and vaginal CO2 laser therapy and determine if vaginal laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause. STUDY DESIGN: An institutional review board-exempt cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by constructing a decision tree using decision analysis software (TreeAge Pro; TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA) using integrated empirical data from the published literature. Tornado plots and 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess how changes in the model's input parameters altered the overall outcome of the cost-effectiveness analysis model. RESULTS: All 3 treatment methods were found to be cost-effective below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000.00 per quality-adjusted life year for moderate dyspareunia. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for vaginal CO2 laser therapy was $16,372.01 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ospemifene therapy was $5711.14. Although all 3 treatment strategies were on the efficient frontier, vaginal CO2 laser therapy was the optimal treatment strategy with the highest effectiveness. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis of treatment adherence, vaginal CO2 laser therapy was no longer cost-effective when the adherence fell below 38.8%. Vaginal estrogen cream and ospemifene therapies remained cost-effective treatment strategies at all ranges of adherence. When varying the adherence to 100% for all strategies, oral ospemifene therapy was "dominated" by both vaginal CO2 laser therapy and vaginal estrogen cream therapy. In a 2-way sensitivity analysis of vaginal CO2 laser therapy adherence and vaginal CO2 laser therapy cost, vaginal CO2 laser therapy still remained the optimal treatment strategy at 200% of its current cost ($5554.00) when the adherence was >55%. When the cost fell to 20% of its current cost ($555.40), it was the optimal treatment strategy at all adherence values above 29%. CONCLUSION: This study showed that vaginal fractional CO2 laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with GSM, as are both vaginal estrogen and oral ospemifene therapies. In our model, vaginal CO2 laser therapy is the optimal cost-effective treatment strategy, and insurance coverage should be considered for this treatment option if it is proven to be safe and effective in FDA trials.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is still an unmet medical need: results of an Italian Delphi Panel.

PURPOSE: VVA is a common disease, with approximately 50% of all postmenopausal women having related symptoms. VVA has a significant impact on the personal and sexual lives and on many aspects of women's self-esteem and emotional well-being. It is particularly frequent and severe in patients treated for BC, where it originates significant economic and social costs. Given the lack of published evidence on this subject, a Delphi Panel was carried out to evaluate:The epidemiology of VVA and of its risk-factors/comorbidities in ItalyThe present standard of care and unmet medical needsThe comparison between recent US epidemiological data and the Italian situationThe health resources used in VVA BC The burden of illnessDespite the considerable negative impact on quality of life, a disparity between the high prevalence of this condition and the infrequent clinical diagnosis is documented in medical practice and in surveys. This inaccuracy is thought to be primarily a consequence of patients' unwillingness and/or reluctance to report symptoms in the clinical setting and of health-care professional's difficulty in approaching this sensitive topic during routine consultations. METHODS: A Delphi Panel methodology was used: a first round of written questionnaires, followed by a plenary meeting with a facilitator and by two additional rounds of telephone interviews. RESULTS: The prevalence of the condition in Italy can be estimated in 115,000 cases out of 380,000 BC survivors. The Panel confirmed that the epidemiological findings of a recent pharmacoeconomic analysis of a US claims database can be applied to Italian patient population. The Panel confirmed also an estimate of 4.25 additional cases/100/yr of UTI (urinary tract infection) in VVA BC patients (vs. a non-VVA-matched population), of 3.68 additional cases of vulvovaginitis, of 6.97 cases of climacteric symptoms, and of 3.64 cases of bone and joint disorders. As far as the resource use is concerned, in the VVA BC populations, 33.4 additional gynecological visits/100/year can be expected, along with 22.8 additional cancer screenings, 7.07 additional outpatient visits and 5.04 screenings for HPV. CONCLUSIONS: Even in Italy, a diagnosis of VVA, especially in a BC population, is associated with a relevant increase in the burden of illness and social costs, compared to a control population matched for age without VVA. This is due essentially to an increase in comorbidities and resource utilization with the consequence that an adequate treatment could reduce the impact of the condition.

Ospemifene efficacy and safety data in women with vulvovaginal atrophy.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a frequent, underreported and underdiagnosed condition. Ospemifene is a third-generation Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM) that has been shown to be effective in women with VVA and dyspareunia, vaginal dryness and vulvar vestibular symptoms. Some of the possible side effects included by FDA and EMA are hot flushes, headache, muscle spasms, vaginal bleeding and vaginal discharge. Ospemifene does not increase the incidence of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia. While the efficacy is comparable with that of estrogenic treatments, ospemifene is not only well tolerated and safe but also reduces bone turnover in postmenopausal women, and available data indicate no safety concerns for breast tissue.

Ospemifene plus fractional CO2 laser: a powerful strategy to treat postmenopausal vulvar pain.

This study is a single-center, retrospective analysis of postmenopausal women presenting with dyspareunia and vulvar pain, aiming to evaluate relative effectiveness of vestibular CO2 laser therapy as a treatment. Three monthly sessions of laser were performed to each patient and thereafter a three-months follow-up was stablished. A total number of 72 patients undergoing vestibular laser treatment were recruited from patient files in the period between 2016 and 2018. Among these, 39 women also received a concomitant treatment with ospemifene (60 mg/day) during the study period. There was a statistically significant reduction of all the symptoms in both groups up to the three month follow-up. Regarding dryness and dyspareunia, the relief tent to be more prominent in the ospemifene + laser group at all follow-ups and remained statistically significant at three-month follow-up. Specifically, vestibular dryness was significantly lower in the ospemifene + laser group compared with the laser treatment group (-87% vs - 34%, respectively), and the vestibular health score started declining faster in the ospemifene + laser group. Although, additional research is needed to understand the mechanism of action, our data shows that a combination regimen of laser and ospemifene may improve clinical effectiveness for long-term treatment of symptoms associated with the under-recognized genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Effects of ospemifene on bone in postmenopausal women.

Ospemifene is a selective estrogen-receptor modulator approved for treating menopause-related moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), in the United States, and for treating menopause-related, symptomatic VVA in women not appropriate for local estrogen therapy in Europe. This review summarizes the effects of ospemifene on bone, including bone biomarker data from a phase 3 vaginal dryness study. Early-phase studies of postmenopausal women showed that ospemifene dose-dependently decreased bone turnover markers versus placebo, similar to raloxifene. A 12-week, phase 3 study of ospemifene 60 mg/day in postmenopausal women showed improvements in all VVA parameters and significantly greater decreases in seven of nine bone biomarkers versus placebo. Lower bone resorption markers with ospemifene were observed regardless of time since menopause (≤5 years or >5 years) or baseline bone mineral density (BMD) (normal [n = 18], osteopenia [n = 164], or osteoporosis [n = 21]). Biomarker studies (n = 565 who took ospemifene) therefore support a potential role for ospemifene in maintaining bone health (and possibly reducing fracture risk) in postmenopausal women taking it for VVA; however, caution is warranted because data are limited to biochemical markers, rather than fracture and BMD. Although studies show that bone turnover predicts BMD and fractures, any hypothesis about a bone-sparing effect of ospemifene needs testing in rigorous, long-term, phase 3 studies monitoring fractures and BMD.

Usefulness of Ospemifene in the treatment of urgency in menopausal patients affected by mixed urinary incontinence underwent mid-urethral slings surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of Ospemifene in the improvement of urgency component in women affected by mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) who underwent surgery with mid-urethral sling (MUS). Eighty-one patients with MUI underwent surgical intervention with MUS were enrolled. After surgical intervention 38 patients received Ospemifene 60 mg one tablet daily per os for 12 weeks. Physical examination, 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic testing were performed at the start and the follow-up after 12 weeks in the Trans-Obturator-Tape (TOT)-Alone group and TOT-Ospemifene. Patients completed the Overactive Bladder Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Short-Form (OAB-Q SF), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI-SF), and King' s Health Questionnaire (KHQ). A significant difference between the two groups was observed in peak flow (ml/s), in first voiding desire (ml), in maximum cystometric capacity (ml), and in detrusor pressure at peak flow (cmH2O) at urodynamic evaluation. A significative difference between the two groups at voiding diary was observed in the mean number of voids, urgent micturition episodes/24 h, urge urinary incontinence, and in nocturia events. The OAB-Q symptoms and OAB-Q (HRQL) scores after 12 weeks showed a significative difference between the two groups. Ospemifene is an effective potential therapy after MUSs in women with MUI improving urgency symptoms and quality of life.

Determination of ospemifene in human plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a human pharmacokinetic study.

A highly sensitive, specific and rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical method has been developed and validated for the determination of ospemifene in human plasma using ospemifene-d4 as an internal standard. Solid-phase extraction technique with Phenomenex Strata X-33 µm polymeric sorbent cartridges (30 mg/1 mL) was used to extract the analytes from the plasma. The chromatographic separation was achieved on Agilent Eclipse XDB-Phenyl, 4.6 × 75 mm, 3.5 µm column using the mobile phase composition of methanol and 20 mm ammonium formate buffer (90:10, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. A detailed method validation was performed as per the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines and the calibration curve obtained was linear (r2  = 99) over the concentration range 5.02-3025 ng/mL. The API-4500 MS/MS was operated under multiple reaction monitoring mode during the analysis. The proposed method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy human volunteers after oral administration of an ospemifene 60 mg tablet under fed conditions.