Impact of Oophorectomy on Survival and Improving Nutritional Status in Ovarian Metastasis from Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian metastasis of colorectal cancer is known to have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of patients who underwent oophorectomy for ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 16 patients who underwent oophorectomy for colorectal cancer metastasis to the ovary from January 2004 to December 2017. Improvement in patient's symptoms and pre- and postoperative changes in various nutritional and inflammatory indicators were assessed. Survival analysis and identification of prognostic factors were conducted with a median follow-up of 40.7 (5-109) months. RESULTS: Of 16 patients, 12 had (75%) synchronous and 4 (25%) had metachronous metastasis. Fourteen patients were symptomatic but symptoms resolved postoperatively. Thirteen patients (81.3%) had ascites and 5 (31.3%) had pleural effusion on preoperative computed tomography that disappeared after surgery in all cases. The median value of prognostic nutritional factor was significantly increased postoperatively (36.0 [preoperatively] vs. 47.5, p < 0.0001). The median (interquartile range) values for lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio were 715.2 (110-2,607) preoperatively and 6,095.2 (1,612.3-14,431.8) postoperatively (p = 0.0214). The median survival of the entire cohort was 60.4 months. The 3-year survival rates for R0 + R1 and R2 cases were 83% and 24% (p = 0.018), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that R2 resection and low postoperative lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio were associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Oophorectomy for ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancers was safely performed. It improved the patients' symptoms and nutritional status and may result in improved prognosis.

Novel predictors for identifying cervical minimal deviation adenocarcinoma patients with poor prognosis: a long-term observational study in a tertiary centre.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA) of the uterine cervix, a clinically rare but highly invasive disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, real-world study of 43 patients with pathologically confirmed MDA at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University between November 2010 and November 2021. Baseline clinicopathological data were collected and reviewed. Prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Chief complaints included irregular vaginal discharge and/or bleeding (74.4%). Preoperative diagnosis was difficult, the detection rate was low (36.8%), all cases showed endophytic lesions, and 88.4% had deep stromal invasion, with biologically aggressive characteristics. The ovarian metastasis rate was high (16.3%, 7/43). The median maximum diameter of the tumour (MDOT) was 4.3 cm (range, 0.5-8.0 cm). MDOT was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.009), and the optimal cut-off value to define bulky MDA was 5.5 cm (P < 0.0001, χ= 21.161) using X-tile software. Independent prognostic factors included MDOT (HR = 10.095, P = 0.001) and ovarian metastasis (HR = 5.888, P = 0.008) for OS and MDOT (HR = 3.944, P = 0.028), ovarian metastasis (HR = 9.285, P = 0.001), and deep infiltration (HR = 3.627, P = 0.048) for PFS. CONCLUSION: Endophytic lesion development and ovarian metastasis are likely in MDA. A bulky tumour and ovarian metastasis indicate a worse prognosis. Given the special biological features of MDA, it is more appropriate to use 5.5 cm as the threshold for defining a bulky tumour than it is to use 4 cm. Ovary removal should be given higher priority to improve prognosis.

Transcriptomic characterization and construction of M2 macrophage-related prognostic and immunotherapeutic signature in ovarian metastasis of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian metastasis (OM) poses a major threat to the outcome of gastric cancer (GC) patients. Recently, immunotherapy emerged as a novel promising therapeutic strategy to treat late-stage GC, whereas its efficacy is influenced by tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). M2 macrophage, a key subset within TIME, plays dual immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic roles in cancer progression and is recognized as a potential therapeutic target. However, molecular mechanisms underlying OM remain elusive and the TIME-related prognostic and immunotherapeutic index for these patients is yet to establish. METHODS: Differential expressed genes (DEGs) between paired normal mucosa, primary GC and OM of patients from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) cohort (n = 6) were identified by transcriptome sequencing, followed by the functional annotation of enriched hallmark pathways of DEGs between them. CIBERSORT was used to profile the relative expression level of 22 immune cell subsets in normal tissues, primary and metastatic tumors, followed by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) uncovering immune cell-correlated gene sets. The intersected genes between DEGs and M2 macrophage-related genes were processed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis to construct a predictive signature, M2GO, which was further validated by training set and test set of The Cancer Genome Atlas-Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD), GSE62254 and GSE84437 cohorts. GC patients were divided into M2GO-high and -low subgroup according to the optimal cutoff value of the M2GO score. Furthermore, the clinical, molecular and immune features between M2GO-high and -low subgroups were analyzed. Clinical cohorts of immunotherapy were used to validate the predictive value of M2GO in regard to immunotherapy effectiveness. RESULTS: Transcriptomic sequencing and follow-up analyses of triple-matched normal tissues, primary and ovarian metastatic tumors identified distinctive sets of DEGs and enriched immune-, cancer- and metastasis-related pathways between them. Of note, M2 macrophage, a major immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic component within TIME, was significantly up-regulated in OMs. WGCNA and LASSO regression were applied to establish a novel OM- and M2 macrophage-related predictive signature, M2GO, based on M2 macrophage-related prognostic genes including GJA1, MAGED1 and SERPINE1. M2GO served as an independent prognostic factor of GC patients. Comprehensive molecular and immune characterization of M2GO-based subgroups uncovered their distinctive features in terms of enriched functional pathways, tumor mutation burden, key immune checkpoints, major regulators of natural immune cGAS-STING pathway, infiltrated subsets of immune cells and tumor immune exclusion/dysfunction (TIDE) score. Notably, the M2GO score was significantly lower in responsive group than non-responsive group (P < 0.05) in clinical cohort of metastatic GC patients undergoing immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Transcriptomic characterization of paired normal mucosae, primary and ovarian metastatic tumors revealed their unique molecular and immune features. Follow-up analyses established a novel OM- and M2 macrophage-related signature, M2GO, which served as a promising prognostic and immunotherapeutic biomarker to distinguish the clinical outcome, molecular and immune features of GC patients and predict their differential responses to immunotherapy.

Aggressive surgical intervention may improve prognosis in patients with ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to investigate the prognostic clinicopathological factors of synchronous and metachronous ovarian metastasis (OM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with and without oophorectomy. METHODS: Female patients with OM from CRC who underwent primary tumor resection at our institution from January 2013 to December 2020 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 661 female patients, 22 (3.3%) were diagnosed with OM. Among 22 patients with OM, 12 underwent OM resection. Twenty (91%) patients had extra OM upon diagnosis. Thirteen (59%) patients in the non-surgery group had peritoneal dissemination at surgery or on computed tomography scan or positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Two patients in the OM surgery group had emergency surgery because of abdominal pain. Four patients had postoperative complications, and the median duration of hospital admission was 16.5 days. The median survival time from OM diagnosis to mortality was 20.9 months. Then, the association between the clinicopathological factors and overall survival (OS) was investigated. Tumor location and surgery were found to be related to OS (p = 0.03, 0.006, respectively) in the univariate analysis. However, only surgery was associated with OS (p = 0.02) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Surgery is an important prognostic clinicopathological factor of OM from CRC. OM tumors should be resected because OM surgery is less likely to cause complications and symptoms.

Impacts of ovarian preservation on the prognosis of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a retrospective analysis based on machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy with younger patients compared to other common histology types. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of ovarian preservation (OP) on the prognosis of NECC through machine learning. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2021, 116 NECC patients with a median age of 46 years received OP or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and were enrolled in a retrospective analysis with a median follow-up of 41 months. The prognosis was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Random forest, LASSO, stepwise, and optimum subset prognostic models were constructed in training cohort (randomly selected 70 patients) and tested in 46 patients through receiver operator curves. Risk factors for ovarian metastasis were identified through univariate and multivariate regression analyses. All data processing was carried out in R 4.2.0 software. RESULTS: Among 116 patients, 30 (25.9%) received OP and showed no significantly different OS compared with BSO group (p = 0.072) and got better DFS (p = 0.038). After construction of machine learning models, the safety of OP was validated in lower prognostic risk group (p > 0.05). In patients ≤ 46 years, no impacts of OP were shown for DFS (p = 0.58) or OS (p = 0.67), and OP had no impact on DFS in different relapse risk population (p > 0.05). In BSO group, regression analyses showed that later stage, para-aortic LNM, and parametrial involvement were associated with ovarian metastasis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preserving ovaries had no significant impact on prognosis in patients with NECC. OP should be considered cautiously in patients with ovarian metastasis risk factors.

Frequency and therapeutic strategy for patients with ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer. METHODS: This study included 155 female patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer at the Kochi Medical School between January 2007 and December 2021. A review of patients with ovarian metastasis was conducted, and their clinicopathological information and survival outcomes were compared with respect to ovarian metastasis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were diagnosed with ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer with a median age of 54 years (range: 30-87 years) and an incidence of 9.7%. The median age of patients who developed ovarian metastasis was significantly lower those without ovarian metastasis (54 years vs. 71 years, P = 0.014). The median survival time (MST) for 15 patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer who developed ovarian metastasis was 21.4 months (range: 0.2-41.4 months). The MST for 15 patients who underwent surgical resection and systemic drug treatment including chemotherapy to ovarian metastasis was significantly higher than those who received systemic drug treatment alone (28.1 months vs. 10.0 months; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Ovarian metastasis was found in 9.7% of female patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer and in younger patients than in those without ovarian metastasis. Multidisciplinary treatment, including surgical resection and systemic drug treatment for ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer, may benefit selected patients.

Decision-making in postoperative chemotherapy for ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer are relatively uncommon, and no consensus has been reached regarding resection of metastases or chemotherapy before and after surgery. We evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer and the impact of metastatic resection. We also performed a comparative analysis to clarify the prognostic impact of metastatic resection and the choice of chemotherapy before and after surgery. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2014, 38 patients at our institution underwent resection of ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer. Clinicopathological data were extracted from the patients' records and evaluated with respect to the long-term outcome. For 15 patients with metachronous ovarian metastases who received chemotherapy until immediately before resection, we compared the prognosis with and without changes in the regimen after resection. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 19.9%, and the median survival duration was 27.2 months. The survival rate in the R0 resection group (n = 8) was significantly better than that in the R1/2 resection group (n = 30) (P = 0.0004). Patients without peritoneal dissemination (n = 15) or extra-ovarian metastases (n = 31) had a significantly better prognosis than those with peritoneal dissemination (n = 23) or extra-ovarian metastases (n = 7) (P = 0.040 and P = 0.0005, respectively). The progression-free survival and median survival times of patients who resumed chemotherapy after resection without a change in their preoperative regimen were 10.2 months and 26.2 months, respectively, while those among patients with a change in their regimen before resection versus after resection were 11.0 months and 18.1 months, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (progression-free survival time and median survival time: P = 0.52 and P = 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent R0 resection of ovarian metastases clearly had a better prognosis than those who underwent R1/2 resection. Additionally, a poor prognosis was associated with the presence of peritoneal dissemination and extra-ovarian metastases. The data also suggested that resumption of chemotherapy without changing the regimen after resection could preserve the next line of chemotherapy for future treatment and improve the prognosis.

Developing a validated nomogram for predicting ovarian metastasis in endometrial cancer patients: a retrospective research.

OBJECTIVE: To explore risk factors and develop a prediction model for ovarian metastasis in endometrial cancer (EC), as well as providing provide a reference for clinical ovarian preservation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study enrolling 1496 EC patients having received complete staging surgery from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from 2012 to 2018. These patients were randomly divided into two cohorts: training cohort (n = 1046) and validation cohort (n = 448). A nomogram prediction model was developed based on univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), and multivariate logistic regression. Then, the nomogram model's performance was evaluated in discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility three aspects. RESULTS: Parametrium invasion, lymph node metastasis, and oviduct metastasis were finally contained in the nomogram prediction model. The AUC of the model in the training cohort was 0.85 compared with 0.72 in the validation cohort. It also behaved well in calibration and had good clinical utility. With a threshold probability of 20% ~ 80%, the nomogram increased the net benefit by 0 ~ 13.6 per 100 patients than surgery for all patients upon validation. CONCLUSIONS: We develop a nomogram with good performances for predicting ovarian metastasis in EC patients, which may help clinicians identify candidate patients appropriate for ovarian preservation in premenopausal EC patients.

Giant ovarian tumor with colorectal cancer: suggestion concerning the need for colonoscopy screening in cases with large ovarian tumor-a report of three cases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with giant ovarian tumor often have severe symptoms, such as abdominal distention, and the tumor tends to grow rapidly; therefore, sufficient preoperative assessments are difficult to perform. It is not always easy to differentiate between primary and metastatic ovarian cancer, especially when the ovarian tumor is huge, since a precise diagnosis of ovarian tumor depends on the histopathological findings of the excised specimen. Although metastatic ovarian tumors account for over 20% of all malignant ovarian tumors, preoperative colonoscopy is not considered a routine examination before surgery for giant ovarian tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein report 3 cases of giant (> 25 cm) ovarian tumor with colorectal cancer. All three patients visited the clinic with progressing abdominal distention, and were referred with primary ovarian malignancy. Case 1: Rectal tumor was suspected by a digital examination at the outpatient clinic, and rectal cancer was diagnosed preoperatively by colonoscopy. Computed tomography revealed a single-nodule liver tumor. Ovariectomy, rectal resection, and partial hepatectomy were performed. A histological examination revealed both primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma and rectal carcinoma with liver metastasis. Case 2: Initially, the ovarian tumor was diagnosed as primary carcinoma based on the histological findings of an incision biopsy at the previous hospital. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer was administered without remission, and subsequently, the patient was referred to our hospital. Since the CEA level was high (142 ng/ml), colonoscopy was performed and cecal cancer was diagnosed. Ovariectomy and right colectomy were performed, and the ovarian tumor was histologically diagnosed as metastatic adenocarcinoma. Case 3: Initial ovariectomy was performed, and rectal cancer was suspected at intra-operative surveillance. Colonoscopy was performed after surgery, and rectal cancer was diagnosed. The ovarian tumor was diagnosed as metastatic adenocarcinoma. After six cycles of FOLFOX, rectal resection was performed. CONCLUSION: Regrettably, two of three cases in the current series were not diagnosed with colorectal cancer at the start of treatment. This experience suggests that screening colonoscopy should be considered before treatment for every case of giant ovarian tumor.

Characteristics and clinicopathological features of patients with ovarian metastasis of endometrial cancer: a retrospective study.

There are no criteria for patient selection for ovarian-preserving surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). In this study, intraoperative findings of ovarian swelling (OvS) and the clinicopathological features of patients with EC with or without ovarian metastasis were analysed to identify risk factors for ovarian metastasis. Patients who underwent surgery for EC between 2012 and 2019 at our hospital were enrolled. In univariate analysis, all features were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and OvS were significant risk factors. In univariate analysis in stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. LSI, CSI, and OvS were significant risk factors in multivariate analysis. Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI and extrauterine lesions are appropriate for ovarian preservation. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The number of premenopausal patients with endometrial cancer (EC) is increasing. Bilateral oophorectomy for EC results in surgical primary ovarian insufficiency, and thus, surgery with ovarian preservation has been examined. However, there are few reports on risk factors for ovarian metastasis of EC and no established criteria for patient background or pathological factors to determine suitability for ovarian preservation surgery.What do the results of this study add? In univariate analysis, all pathological findings suggestive of disease progression were more frequent in cases with ovarian metastases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and ovarian swelling (OvS) were identified as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis. In an analysis of stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly more common in cases with ovarian metastasis, and LSI, CSI, and OvS emerged as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis in multivariate analysis.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without depth of myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI, or extrauterine lesions may be appropriate cases for ovarian preservation.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer patients with ovarian metastasis: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: As a kind of secondary tumor of the ovary, ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer (OMCRC) happens rarely. Prognostic factors of OMCRC are still undetermined. This study was conducted to analyze clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of OMCRC patients. METHODS: Data of patients with OMCRC were collected retrospectively from four large-capacity hospitals in China. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate disease-specific overall survival (OS), and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors. A novel nomogram was developed to estimate individual survival probability, whose performance was internally validated using concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS: Totally, 162 cases were eligible, with a median age at diagnosis of 49 years old. The median size of ovarian metastases was 9.0 cm (95% CI: 8.5-10.4 cm). 93.8% of patients received surgery of ovarian metastases. Median time from CRC diagnosis to metachronous ovarian metastasis was 13.0 months (95% CI: 13.5-17.7 months). Median OS after ovarian metastasis diagnosis was 26.0 months (95% CI: 22.3-29.7 months). Integrating univariate and multivariate analyses, eight factors (including age, menopausal status, primary tumor location, N stage of primary tumor, surgery of primary tumor, differentiation grade, bilateral metastasis, and systemic chemotherapy) were used to develop a novel nomogram, with a C-index of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.595-0.705). Calibration curves indicated relatively good agreement between predicted and actual survival. CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram could be a promising tool to help clinicians to estimate individual survival outcome of patients with OMCRC. Further study is warranted to validate the practicality of this model.

Lung Adenocarcinoma with Metachronous Ovarian Metastasis: a long survival case report.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma which invades ovaries is very rare. However, with the increase of long-survival female lung cancer, more patients will suffer ovarian metastasis. On grounds of the paucity of reported cases, the clinicopathological features and treatment strategies remain unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient was stage IV lung adenocarcinoma at first diagnosis. Following multiple-line systemic treatments, she experienced extensive pelvic metastasis. After debulking surgery and reevaluation about the drive genes, she was administered by targeted therapy. Up to now, the patient has shown no evidence of progression for 8 years after the initial diagnosis of primary lung cancer and 46 months after her ovarian metastasis. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive treatment modality for the bilateral ovarian metastasis is effective in clinical course.

Gross mucinous multinodular appearance aids in the identification of ovarian metastases in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms during intraoperative consultation.

Ovarian metastases of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) show grossly abundant nodular mucous cells, with a gross mucinous multinodular appearance and a histological resemblance to primary ovarian mucinous tumors (POMTs). This study aimed to elucidate the utility of gross features including the gross mucinous multinodular appearance and available clinical information at the time of intraoperative consultation, in distinguishing the ovarian metastases of LAMNs from POMTs or the ovarian metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC). In total, 776 patients with primary ovarian tumor and 68 patients with ovarian metastases underwent intraoperative consultation during 1998-2018. Of the total cases, 4 ovarian metastases of LAMNs, 19 ovarian metastases of CRC, and 50 POMTs (36 borderline tumors and 14 carcinomas) were identified. The gross features including the gross mucinous multinodular appearance were analyzed based on the gross photographs obtained before formalin fixation and the available clinical information collected during intraoperative consultation. The analysis indicated that the ovarian metastases of LAMNs significantly presented with gross mucinous multinodular appearance (4/4 vs. 0/50, P < 0.0001), extraovarian disease (4/4 vs. 2/50, P < 0.0001), ovarian surface involvement (3/4 vs. 2/50, P = 0.0016), and abnormal appendix (4/4 vs. 0/50, P < 0.0001) as compared to POMT. Moreover, the gross mucinous multinodular appearance was a distinguishable feature between the ovarian metastases of LAMNs and ovarian metastases of CRC (4/4 vs. 0/19, P = 0.0001). Based on these results, we proposed an algorithm to diagnose ovarian tumors using the gross mucinous multinodular appearance. Thus, recognizing unique gross features including the gross mucinous multinodular appearance would be useful for both pathologists and surgeons to accurately diagnose ovarian metastases of LAMNs during intraoperative consultation.

[Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of 122 patients with colorectal cancer metastasize to the ovary].

Objective: To explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 122 female patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer underwent treatment in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2010 and 2015 were recruited. The clinicopathological features, treatment details and survival data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Maier method was used for survival analysis, log rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for prognostic factor analysis. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 19.7 months. The 1-year, 3-years and 5-years OS rates were 72.1%, 24.7% and 9.9%, respectively. A total of 99 (81.1%) patients underwent oophorectomy. The median OS of patients who underwent oophorectomy was 21.9 months, significantly longer than 10.3 months of patients without oophorectomy (P<0.01). Ovary as the only site of metastasis, primary tumor resection, and oophorectomy were associated with improved survival (all P<0.01). Primary tumor resection and oophorectomy were independent prognostic factors for OS (both P<0.01). Conclusion: Patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer might acquire a survival benefit from surgical resection of the primary tumor and ovaries.

CHALLENGES OF AN OVARIAN NEUROENDOCRINE METASTASIS OF ADVANCED SMALL-CELL LUNG CARCINOMA - LITERATURE REVIEW AND CASE REPORT.

Metastatic tumors account for 5-10% of all ovarian malignancies. They are usually bilateral tumors with a multinodular surface and extensive extra ovarian spread. Lung cancer is a rare source (0.3% of metastatic ovarian tumors). Among synchronous primary cancers, ovarian cancer is most frequently associated with endometrial cancer. The differential diagnosis between a primary ovarian carcinoma, synchronous primary cancers, and metastatic ovarian carcinoma is very important, as the treatment and prognosis are markedly different. We report the case of a 25-year-old woman who had been diagnosed and treated for stage IIIB small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Imaging undertaken for abdominal pain revealed a unilateral 8.5 cm ovarian tumor for which adnexectomy was performed. Histology and immunohistochemistry led to the diagnosis of ovarian metastasis from SCLC, a high-grade neuroendocrine lung tumor. This patient's particular features, all infrequent in a metastatic tumor, are the lesion's unilaterality (atypical for ovarian metastases in other cancers, but often observed in SCLC), the smooth ovarian surface with intact capsule, and the absence of intra-abdominal dissemination. The patient developed liver and vertebral metastases. This report focuses on the differential diagnosis between primary and metastatic ovarian neoplasms. We performed an extensive search of the literature on SCLC and ovarian metastases. Immunohistochemistry is essential for diagnosis when imaging and the pathological evaluation of the ovarian tumor cannot make the differential diagnosis.

Krukenberg Tumors: Update on Imaging and Clinical Features.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this case-based article is to discuss the pathophysiologic findings, common pathways of spread, and imaging features associated with Krukenberg tumors. CONCLUSION. Not all ovarian metastases are Krukenberg tumors. Krukenberg tumors are the most common subtype of ovarian metastases, and they are histologically characterized by signet ring cell mucinous features. Common primary tumor sites include the stomach or colon. Although often difficult, distinguishing between Krukenberg tumors and primary ovarian malignancy on imaging is important because of management and prognostic implications.

HPV DNA integration site as proof of the origin of ovarian metastasis from endocervical adenocarcinoma: three case reports.

BACKGROUND: Most endocervical adenocarcinomas are human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers associated with p16 immunostaining. Ovarian metastasis from cervical cancer is a rare phenomenon, the mechanism of dissemination remains unclear. The diagnosis of metastasis may be difficult to establish when the ovarian neoplasm presents features consistent with primary tumor. Immunohistochemical expression of p16 in ovarian tumors can guide the diagnosis of metastasis from HPV-related cervical cancer, but p16 positivity is nonspecific. Identical HPV genotype in the paired endocervical and ovarian tumors is a better marker for cervical origin, which may also be confirmed by identical HPV integration site. CASE PRESENTATION: Two women presented with HPV18 cervical adenocarcinoma. No signs of disease were visible on MRI after treatment. After several years of follow-up, mucinous ovarian tumors were discovered in both patients. Molecular analyses showed that the ovarian lesions were HPV18-positive; indicating a primary cervical origin. A third woman was diagnosed with grade 1 ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with no peritoneal carcinomatosis. Final histological examination and HPV genotyping revealed HPV18-related in situ endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the endocervix and HPV18-related invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the endometrium and both ovaries. Additional molecular analyses performed in two patients identified the same HPV integration sites in both the ovarian and cervical tumors, confirming that the ovarian mass was a metastasis from the cervical adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: We report three new cases of ovarian neoplasia in which the diagnosis of metastasis from cervical cancer was supported by the same HPV genotype and the same integration site in the paired cervical and ovarian tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of molecular evidence of the cervical origin of an ovarian metastasis. HPV screening should be performed in ovarian tumors for all patients with history of cervical neoplasia.

Independent risk factors for ovarian metastases in stage IA-IIB cervical carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor in women; most cervical cancer patients are premenopausal. Ovarian resection or preservation remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to discover the risk factors for ovarian metastasis in women with stage I-II cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 3292 women with cervical carcinoma who had undergone radical hysterectomy, with pelvic lymphadenectomy and bilateral oophorectomy or wedge resection of ovaries, were included in this multicenter retrospective study. We analyzed patients' demographics, International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage, and histopathologic records to determine clinicopathologic risk factors of ovarian metastasis. RESULTS: Of the patients, 115 (3.49%) were confirmed to have ovarian metastasis. The ovarian metastasis rate was 2% (56/2794) for squamous cell carcinoma and 11.8% (59/498) for nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The risk factors independently associated with ovarian metastasis were histologic type (odds ratio [OR] 8.76, 95% CI 2.09-19.24), lymph node metastasis (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.76-4.89), lymphovascular space invasion (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.98-4.24), and corpus invasion (OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.37-11.42). CONCLUSIONS: The histologic type, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion, and corpus invasion were independently associated with ovarian metastasis. Histologic type and corpus invasion were the most important risk factors. Therefore, we suggest that corpus invasion might be a strong contraindication for preservation of the ovaries.

Identifying a candidate population for ovarian conservation in young women with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer.

This study seeks to identify risk factors associated with ovarian metastasis and to characterize a population with minimum risk of ovarian metastasis in young women with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. This was a nation-wide multicenter retrospective study in Japan examining consecutive cases of surgically-treated women with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer who had oophorectomy at radical hysterectomy (n = 5,697). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for ovarian metastasis. Ovarian metastasis was seen in 70 (1.2%, 95% confidence interval 0.9-1.5) cases. In the entire cohort, adenocarcinoma, lympho-vascular space invasion, uterine corpus tumor invasion, and pelvic/para-aortic nodal metastases remained independent risk factors for ovarian metastasis (all, adjusted-p < 0.05). In a sensitivity analysis of 3,165 women aged <50 years (ovarian metastasis, 1.0%), adenocarcinoma, parametrial tumor involvement, uterine corpus tumor involvement, and pelvic/para-aortic nodal metastases remained independent risk factors for ovarian metastasis (all, adjusted-P < 0.05). In the absence of these five risk factors (representing 46.1% of women aged <50 years), the incidence of ovarian metastasis was 0.14%. With the presence of adenocarcinoma alone (representing 18.9% of women aged <50 years), the incidence of ovarian metastasis was 0.17% and was not associated with increased risk of ovarian metastasis compared to the subgroup without any risk factors (p = 0.87). In conclusion, nearly two thirds of women aged <50 years with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer had no risk factor for ovarian metastasis or had adenocarcinoma alone: these subgroups had ovarian metastasis rates of around 0.1% and may be a candidate population for ovarian conservation at surgical treatment.

Safety of ovarian tissue transplantation in patients with borderline ovarian tumors.

STUDY QUESTION: Is transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) a safe procedure? SUMMARY ANSWER: BOT cells were found in frozen-thawed and xenografted ovarian tissue in 1 of 11 BOT patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The risk of reintroducing malignant cells upon ovarian tissue transplantation has been subject of debate for many years. Reimplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from leukemia patients is unsafe, while results from studies of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from other forms of cancer, such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, are reassuring. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective experimental study conducted in an academic research unit using ovarian tissue from 11 patients undergoing cryopreservation for BOTs. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mucin 1 (MUC1) and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and molecular analysis by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for CK7 and MUC1 were performed on frozen-thawed ovarian tissue from 11 patients. Long-term (5 months) xenografting of ovarian tissue in immunodeficient mice was performed. The xenografts were analyzed by histology, IHC and RT-qPCR, furthermore IHC for CD10, a marker of endometriosis, was performed on a selected sample. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Analysis by histology, IHC and RT-qPCR indicated 10 of the ovarian tissue samples were negative. Analysis of the xenograft samples indicated nine were negative for malignant cells but in two xenografts glandular lesions were detected by histology. In these two xenografts, CK7 and MUC1 markers were demonstrated by IHC and CK7 expression also by RT-qPCR. A BOT was confirmed in the xenograft in which the original ovarian tissue was positive, while in the other case IHC demonstrated expression of endometriosis marker CD10. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Cryopreserved ovarian fragments cannot be tested before transplantation, therefore the preimplantation analysis cannot guarantee that all cryopreserved fragments will be free of BOT cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: BOT cells can be found in cryopreserved ovarian tissue from BOT patients, therefore preimplantation analysis is an absolute prerequisite. Endometriosis can also be detected in cryopreserved ovarian tissue and caution should also be exercised in this scenario. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS-PDR Convention T.0077.14, Télévie Grant 7.4590.16 awarded to Rossella Masciangelo, and Grant 5/4/150/5 awarded to Marie-Madeleine Dolmans), the Fonds Speciaux de Recherche, and the Foundation Against Cancer. None of the authors have any conflicting interests to declare.