Real-world data of immunotherapy from China in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/MHNSCC), however, there are still unanswered questions about immunotherapy. Furthermore, immunotherapy for R/MHNSCC of the mainland Chinese population are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in real-world settings in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients with R/MHNSCC who received immunotherapy between May 2019 and December 2021. We assessed demographics, efficacy, survival and safety. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the study, all of whom had R/MHNSCC affecting the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and metastatic cancer in the neck with an unknown primary. The objective response rate (ORR) for all patients was found to be 40.6 %. Out of these patients, 11 patients achieved a complete response and 13 achieved a partial response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated to be 10.64 months (range: 1.15-29.24 months), while the median overall survival (OS) was 21.75 months (range 2.0-37.55 months). The addition of local radiotherapy resulted in higher ORR and PFS compared to previous reports. Notably, patients with R/MHNSCC in the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity also showed benefits from immunotherapy. Additionally, patients who achieved stable disease (SD) had similar survival rates to those who achieved partial response (PR), indicating that SD is also an indicator of clinical benefit from immunotherapy. The overall incidence of immune-related adverse reactions in this study was low, with fatigue and rash being the most common side effects. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy for R/MHNSCC in a real-world setting in China. Further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefits of incorporating local radiotherapy into the treatment of R/MHNSCC.

Maintenance treatment with oral anticancer agents after first-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy is of particular significance in patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of maintenance therapy (MT) on the survival prognosis of individuals with recurrent or metastatic NPC. METHODS: The databases Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched in a comprehensive manner. Prospective studies of MT for recurrent or metastatic NPC are required. Study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Two randomized controlled clinical trials, with a total of 294 participants, were analyzed. The maintenance therapy group consisted of 140 participants, while the remaining participants were in the non-maintenance therapy (non-MT) group. The MT group showed a notable enhancement in PFS compared to the non-MT group, with a hazard ratio(HR) of 0.44 and a 95% Confidence interval [CI] of 0.34-0.58 (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was also significantly improved (HR0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58; p < 0.0001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 side effects in the MT group was leukopenia (2.9%), thrombocytopenia (0.7%), and anemia (4.3%), hand-foot syndrome (5.8%), and thrombocytopenia (0.7%). oral mucositis (1.5%), and nausea and vomiting (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oltiracetam) or capecitabine following first-line chemotherapy significantly enhanced OS and PFS in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, while exhibiting minimal incidence of grade 3-4 side effects.

Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To indirectly compare the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) by network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Through August 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC. Outcomes of interest included overall and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Addis 16.5 software was used to perform NMA. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) was used to assess confidence in the evidence. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included in this NMA, involving a total of 4016 patients. The general safety of ICI-based treatments in descending order was as follows: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy, Durvalumab, Toripalimab + Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy, Nivolumab, Tremelimumab. There were differences in the toxicity profile among Toripalimab + Chemotherapy (dermatologic irAEs), Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy (hypothyroidism), Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis), Pembrolizumab (nephrotoxicity), Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (colitis). ICI-based treatment increased the incidence of endocrine irAEs (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) and pneumonitis compared to conventional therapy. Besides, the combination of dual ICIs resulted in a greater occurrence of irAEs compared to the use of a single ICI. CONCLUSIONS: The safety ranking of treatments based on ICIs is significantly influenced by specific irAEs. These irAEs, which vary in type and severity, play a crucial role in determining the overall safety profile of each ICI regimen. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023460267.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of platinum-containing regimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of standard salvage treatment options for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) that has failed platinum-containing regimens. Breakthroughs in immunotherapy have opened up new options for these patients. However, the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy have not been clarified. This study aimed to summarize and assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with RM-NPC who failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. METHODS: Up to August 25, 2022, clinical trials of PD-1 inhibitors in RM-NPC patients who failed platinum-containing regimens were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Retrieval subject terms included "nasopharyngeal carcinoma", "metastatic", "recurrence", "PD-1", and "PD-L1". The clinical trials eligible for inclusion were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies including 842 patients with RM-NPC were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PD-1 inhibitors had promising efficacy in patients with RM-NPC who failed platinum-containing regimens: objective response rate (ORR) was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21-26%), disease control rate (DCR) was 52% (95% CI 45-58%), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 25% (95% CI 18-32%), and 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% (95% CI 37-68%). In terms of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs was 19% (95% CI 13-24%). In addition, we found that PD-1 inhibitors were more effective in patients with PD-L1 positive than in patients with PD-L1 negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma who had failed platinum-containing regimens (ORR 31% (95%CI 26-35%) vs. 21% (95% CI 17-25%)). CONCLUSION: PD-1 inhibitors may provide a survival benefit for patients with RM-NPC who have failed platinum-containing regimens and have the advantage of a good safety profile, making them a promising treatment option.

Potential efficacy of local therapy for progressive lesions after nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN), local therapy (LT) such as surgery or radiotherapy can be treatment options for improved survival or quality of life. To date, however, few reports have addressed the efficacy of LT for sites of disease progression after immune checkpoint inhibitors, including other cancers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with R/M SCCHN originating from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx and treated with nivolumab. We extracted patients undergoing salvage LT or palliative radiotherapy (RT) to the selected progressive lesion at any time after initiation of nivolumab. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received LT. Salvage LT was performed in 9 (37.5%) patients, including surgery and definitive RT in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Palliative RT was performed in 15 (62.5%) patients. LT was provided in 10 (41.7%) patients for oligoprogressive disease. Twelve (50.0%) patients received subsequent systemic therapy immediately after LT. Classification based on patient treatment divided the population into four subgroups with different prognoses (salvage LT followed by subsequent systemic therapy [n = 3], salvage LT alone [n = 6], palliative RT followed by subsequent systemic therapy [n = 9], and palliative RT alone [n = 6]). Median OS in this order was 24.5, 9.0, 7.3, and 2.4 months (p = 0.001). All patients in the salvage LT followed by subsequent systemic therapy group continued nivolumab. CONCLUSION: In R/M SCCHN patients who have received nivolumab, salvage LT for the selected progressive lesion with continuation of nivolumab potentially provides an excellent survival prognosis.

Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment regimens for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the first-line systemic therapy regimens on 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 30 months in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) and figure out the best regimen. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholars were systematically searched for studies in regard to the first-line systemic regimens for R/M-HNSCC from inception to March 2022. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants by network meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was OS, and the second endpoint was PFS. The software implemented was STATA 17.0 MP. RESULTS: Eventually, 18 studies with 5298 patients and 12 first-line systematic regimens were enrolled. immunotherapy + chemotherapy (OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.60-3.31) and single immunotherapy (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.33-2.76) were significantly superior to the EXTREME on OS at 30th month. Meantime, immunotherapy + chemotherapy (SUCRA = 87.7%) has the highest ranking. TPEx (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.48) showed significantly better efficacy compared with EXTREME on PFS at 12th month. Simultaneously, TPEx (SUCRA = 87.1%) had the highest ranking and was the long-lasting first-echelon regimen both in OS and PFS from a longitudinal perspective. It should be noted that EXTREME included platinum-based chemotherapy + fluorouracil + cetuximab, TPEx included docetaxel + cisplatin + cetuximab. CONCLUSION: Considering the efficacy, safety, compliance, and economic profiles collectively, one of the standard first-line regimens, literally TPEx should be recommended as the best choice for R/M-HNSCC. Furthermore, more head-to-head trials are needed to confirm those findings.

Real-world outcomes with second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using SEER-Medicare data.

Aim: To characterize real-world patterns of second-line treatment and outcomes in older patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with advanced/metastatic ESCC between 2010 and 2015 and followed through 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis using SEER-Medicare data. Results: Of 756 patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC, 104 (14%) received second-line therapy; median duration of treatment was 1.5 months. Median overall survival was 5.7 months for all patients receiving second-line treatment, and 4.5, 5.6 and 8.5 months, respectively, for patients receiving taxane monotherapy, taxane combination therapy and nontaxane therapy. Conclusion: A small proportion of patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC received second-line therapy, which was associated with short duration of treatment and poor overall survival.

This study assessed how US physicians have been treating a common type of esophageal cancer, known as squamous cell carcinoma, which has spread from the esophagus to other parts of the body (advanced/metastatic cancer). We looked at information from US cancer registry data on 756 people who were 66 years and older and diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. Only 14% of people received a second kind of chemotherapy after their first chemotherapy was stopped. People received their second chemotherapy for a short period (approximately 6 weeks) and lived for approximately 6 months on average from start of treatment. This research highlights that more effective treatments are needed for older people with advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Outcomes of long-term nivolumab and subsequent chemotherapy in Japanese patients with head and neck cancer: 2-year follow-up from a multicenter real-world study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Here, we report long-term outcomes from this study in the overall population and subgroups stratified by subsequent chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC receiving nivolumab were followed up for 2 years. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and PFS rate. Safety endpoints included the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: Overall, 256 patients received a median of 6.0 doses (range: 1-52) of nivolumab over a median duration of 72.5 days (range: 1-736). Median OS was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-12.0] and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8-2.7). A significant difference between 2-year survivors (n = 62) and non-2-year survivors was observed by median age (P = 0.0227) and ECOG PS (P = 0.0001). Of 95 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 54.7% received paclitaxel ± cetuximab. The median OS and PFS from the start of paclitaxel ± cetuximab were 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9-11.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.3-5.5), respectively. IrAEs were reported in 17.2% of patients. Endocrine (7.0%) and lung (4.3%) disorders were the most common irAEs; kidney disorder (n = 1) was newly identified in this follow-up analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab and potential effectiveness of subsequent chemotherapy in patients with R/M HNC in the real-world setting. Safety was consistent with that over the 1-year follow-up.

The impact of patient preference in the treatment algorithm for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC) has revolutionized the standard of care approach in first-line treatment. The heterogeneity of disease presentation and treatment-related toxicities can be associated with suboptimal patient compliance to oncologic care. Hence, prioritizing quality of life and well-being are crucial aspects to be considered in tailoring the best treatment choice. The aim of our work is to present a short report on the topic of the patient's preference in regard to treatment and its consequences on quality of life in the recurrent/metastatic setting. According to the literature, there's an unmet need on how to assess patient attitude in respect to the choice of treatment. In view of the availability of different therapeutic strategies in first-line management of RM-HNSCC, increasing emphasis should be put on integrating patient preferences into the medical decision-making.

Effectiveness of nivolumab affected by prior cetuximab use and neck dissection in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: results from a retrospective observational study in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: To examine the effect of prior use of cetuximab and neck dissection on the effectiveness of nivolumab, we conducted a large-scale subgroup analysis in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. METHODS: Data on the effectiveness of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. All patients were analyzed for effectiveness by prior cetuximab use. In the analyses for prior neck dissection, only patients with locally advanced disease were included. RESULTS: Of 256 patients analyzed, 155 had received prior cetuximab. Nineteen of 50 patients with local recurrence underwent neck dissection. The objective response rate was 14.7 vs 17.2% (p = 0.6116), median progression-free survival was 2.0 vs 3.1 months (p = 0.0261), and median overall survival was 8.4 vs 12 months (p = 0.0548) with vs without prior cetuximab use, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1 vs 25.9% (p = 0.8455), median progression-free survival was 1.8 vs 3.0 months (p = 0.6650), and median overall survival was 9.1 vs 9.9 months (p = 0.5289) with vs without neck dissection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of nivolumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer regardless of prior cetuximab use or neck dissection history. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436).

Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer in Japanese real-world clinical practice: a multicenter retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: To fill the data gap between clinical trials and real-world settings, this study assessed the overall effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) during Japanese real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC who received nivolumab for the first time between July and December 2017. Data on the clinical use, effectiveness, and safety of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 256 patients were enrolled in this study. The median duration of nivolumab treatment was 72.5 days, with patients receiving a median of 6.0 (range 1-27) doses. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-12.0) months and the estimated 12-month OS rate was 43.2%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.7% overall and 21.1%, 7.1%, and 13.6% in patients with primary nasopharynx, maxillary sinus, and salivary gland tumors, respectively, who had been excluded from CheckMate 141. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5.9% of patients. No new safety signals were identified compared with adverse events noted in CheckMate 141. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in real-world clinical practice are consistent with data from the CheckMate 141 clinical trial. Therapeutic response was also observed in the groups of patients excluded from CheckMate 141. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436).

Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Glasgow Prognostic Score are Associated with Clinical Outcome in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab.

Recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/MHNSCC) has a poor prognosis. Although nivolumab is approved in Japan for treating R/MHNSCC, the response rate is low. Therefore, identifying pretreatment prognostic factors is necessary. This study assessed the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as biomarkers of response to nivolumab. We retrospectively collected the data of 56 R/MHNSCC patients treated with nivolumab between May 2017 and December 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of survival. Patients with a low pretreatment NLR had prolonged OS, and patients with a low pretreatment GPS had increased OS and PFS. A performance score (PS) of 0-1, development of immune-related adverse events, and GPS of 0-1 were significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis. In summary, baseline pretreatment NLR and GPS are independently associated with OS in R/MHNSCC patients treated with nivolumab. Administration of nivolumab while maintaining the PS reflects a immune status of the host and leads to a good OS.

[Discordance of Estrogen Receptor,Progesterone Receptor,Cerb-B2,Ki-67 Index and P53 Expressions between Primary and Recurrent or Metastatic Sites in Breast Cancer Patients].

Objective To approach the discordance of estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),Cerb-B2,Ki-67 index and P53 expressions between primary and regional or distant recurrent lesions in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients.Methods Clinical and pathological data of 56 recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients who were treated in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2001 to February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.The changes in the expressions of ER,PR,Cerb-B2,Ki-67 index,and P53 status were analyzed.Results The hormone receptor positive rate between primary tumor and recurrent or metastatic sites decreased from 60.7% to 57.1% for ER and from 55.4% to 44.6% for PR,respectively.Changes in hormone receptor status were seen at the rate of 12.5%(7/56)and 16.1%(9/56)for ER and PR,respectively.Cerb-B2 receptor positive rate increased from 19.1% to 29.5% and the discordance rate was 9.1%(4/44).The discordance rate of Ki-67 index was 24.5%(12/49).The P53 receptor positive rate increased from 37.5% to 55.6% and the discordance rate was 13.3%(6/45).Conclusion Although the relevant rules of above changes are still controversial,these findings still have great clinical significance for making effective treatment decisions of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Cetuximab-Carboplatin-5-Fluorouracil Regimen in Elderly Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: A French Retrospective Survey.

BACKGROUND: The cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy regimen is a standard of care in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The feasibility in the elderly population is currently unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in order to assess the efficacy and safety of the cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in patients >65 years with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. We performed a retrospective review of all medical records from recurrent or metastatic HNSCC patients >65 years treated with the cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy regimen between September 2008 and December 2013 in our institution (Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France). RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were identified. Carboplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FU) was the only cetuximab-associated chemotherapy regimen used for treating elderly patients. The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-4.7), and the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% CI: 6.5-13.1). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity adverse events occurred in 52% (n = 31) of the patients (mostly hematologic toxicities and infections). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that the cetuximab plus carboplatin-5FU chemotherapy is an effective treatment option for elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.

BACKGROUND: The combination of tislelizumab and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) has yielded significant results. However, it is not clear whether this treatment option is cost-effective in China. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus GP for the first-line treatment of R/M NPC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS: A partitioned survival model with three discrete health states was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus GP versus GP in patients with R/M NPC. The target population enrolled in the RATIONALE-309 trial had previously not treated for R/M NPC. Drug costs were obtained from relevant databases, and the remaining cost and health utility data were collected from the literature. The main outcomes include the expected life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost, and incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICER). RESULTS: The tislelizumab plus GP regimen produced an additional cost ($18392.76) and additional 1.57 QALYs compared with GP used alone. The ICER was $18392.75/QALYs. Sensitivity analysis showed that the analysis was robust and the utility of PD status was most sensitive to the model results. The possibility of tislelizumab plus GP being cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37 653/QALY was 99.8%. Subgroup analysis showed that high PD-L1 expression had little impact on the ICER of this regimen. CONCLUSION: In patients with R/M NPC, the regimen of tislelizumab plus GP, as the first-line treatment, is more cost-effective than the GP regimen in China.

The efficacy of first and second immunotherapy exposure in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Immunotherapy has led to changes in cervical cancer guidelines. Therefore, additional biomarkers to identify the ideal patient who would experience the most benefit may be important. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 208 patients with R/M CC and recorded clinicopathologic information, peripheral blood markers and treatments to analyze the prognostic factors of clinical outcomes. Response rate comparison, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the efficacy of different factors. RESULTS: A total of 43.27% patients achieved objective responses, including 18 with complete response and 72 with partial response. Patients receiving first-line immunotherapy had much higher objective response rate (ORR) than the remaining patients (53.8% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.006). CRP >3 ECOG ≥1 and recurrence in 6 months predicted shorter progression free survival (PFS). CRP >3, GLU >6.1 independently predicted unfavorable overall survival (OS). Compared with no antiangiogenic therapy, previous antiangiogenic therapy reduced the median OS by nearly 14 months. Immunotherapy rechallenge was still effective after first immunotherapy failure, and combined with dual-immunotherapy or bevacizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy resulted in a 60.00% or 62.50% ORR, respectively. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, with stable disease or objective response in the first immunotherapy or without chemotherapy in second immunotherapy had favorable clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The baseline CRP levels in serum was an independent factor for PFS and OS of R/M CC patients treated with immunotherapy, and previous antiangiogenic therapy was associated with poor OS. Patients still show response to immunotherapy rechallenge and combined treatment with bevacizumab or candonilimab showed higher response rate than anti-PD-1 after immunotherapy failure.

Predictive progression outcomes and risk stratification in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received first-line immunochemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Progression after first-line immunochemotherapy (ICT) for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) is a clinical concern due to subsequent limited treatment options. This study firstly predicted the progress outcome. METHODS: A cohort of 186 R/M NPC cases that received first-line ICT was included for developing a Cox regression model for progression-free survival (PFS) and risk stratification, which was verified by cross-validation. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated. Progression sites in risk groups was shown with a Sankey diagram. RESULTS: Baseline predictors including liver metastasis, trend of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA copies, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and level of platelet and lactate dehydrogenase were identified for model construction, which stratify the cohort into low, middle, and high-risk groups. The overall concordance index (C-index) was 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.73). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.68 (95% CI 0.60-0.76), 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.82), 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.84) at predicting 12, 18, and 24 months PFS, indicating a moderate accuracy. Cross-validation showed the model performance was robust. Compared with the low-risk group (median PFS: 24.4 months, 95% CI 18.4 months to not reached), the high-risk group (median PFS: 7.1 months, 95% CI 6.4-10.1 months; hazard risk: 7.4, 95% CI 4.4-12.4, p < 0.001) progressed with more liver metastasis after ICT resistance. CONCLUSION: It was the first study that described the risk factors and progression characteristics in R/M NPC patients who received first-line ICT, investigating the progression patterns, which was helpful to identify patients with different risks and help guide personalized interventions.

Improved outcomes of palliative radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancers.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy provides a remarkable survival advantage for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). However, the role of immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy in R/M CC remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed factors affecting immunotherapy effectiveness in patients with R/M CC. Clinical outcomes including tumor response and patient survival were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test were employed to compare survival data. Cox regression analysis was utilized to investigate prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 65 R/M CC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were eligible for analysis. We found that immunotherapy combined with palliative radiotherapy showed a significant positive correlation with complete response (OR = 6.31; 95 %CI: 1.74-22.91; p = 0.005). The 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (73.7 % vs 33.8 %, p = 0.0048) and 36-month overall survival (OS) rate (85.7 % vs 38.7 %, p = 0.0043) were also prominently increased. We further demonstrated that patients prolonged 36-month PFS rate (69.9 % vs 15.2 %; p < 0.001) and 36-month OS rate (64.6 % vs 39.7 %; p = 0.032) when they had more than 4 cycles of immunotherapy. Meanwhile, our findings showed that patients with only recurrence had longer 36-month OS rate (77.7 % vs 44.4 % vs 40.1 %; p = 0.024) compared to those with only metastasis and both. We also observed that patients with squamous carcinoma had higher 2-year PFS rate (57.9 % vs 14.6 %; p = 0.042) than those with other pathological subtypes (adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of immunotherapy and palliative radiotherapy increased complete response rates and improved survivals in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients.

Real-World Healthcare Resource Use Associated with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Patients Care in Portugal-TRACE Study.

Recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is a challenging disease, requiring personalized management by a multidisciplinary team. The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to characterize real-world healthcare resource use and patient care for R/M HNSCC in Portugal during the first year after diagnosis. A total of 377 patients ineligible for curative treatment were included, mostly male (92.8%), aged 50-69 years (74.5%), with heavy alcohol (72.7%) or smoking habits (89.3%). Oropharynx (33.2%) and oral cavity (28.7%) were primary tumor locations, with lung metastases being the most common (61.4%). Eligible patients for systemic treatment with palliative intent (80.6%) received up to four treatment lines, with varied regimens. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy dominated first-line treatment (>70%), while single-agent chemotherapy and anti-PD1 immunotherapy were prevalent in later lines. Treatment approaches were uniform across disease stages and primary tumor locations but varied geographically. Treated patients received more multidisciplinary support than those who were ineligible. This study provides the first Portuguese real-world description of R/M HNSCC patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and supportive care during the year after diagnosis, highlighting population heterogeneity and aiming to improve patient management.

Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Burden Score Dictate Treatment Responses in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The significance of tumor burden for survival is unknown for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor burden score (TBS) in patients with R/M HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: R/M HNSCC patients who were treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil plus cetuximab (EPF) or pembrolizumab (PPF) as first-line treatment were included in our study. PD-L1 and TBS were estimated and correlated with treatment responses. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for outcomes estimation. RESULTS: A total of 252 R/M HNSCC patients were included, with 126 high tumor burden (HTB) and 126 low tumor burden (LTB) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in LTB and 3.9 months in HTB (p < 0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months in LTB and 9.2 months in HTB (p = 0.001). Patients with LTB had better PFS and OS than those with HTB independent of PD-L1 status. Subgroup analysis showed HTB patients treated with EPF had better survival than those treated with PPF, regardless of PD-L1 expression. For LTB PD-L1 positive patients, there was a longer survival with PPF than EPF, while for LTB PD-L1 negative patients, survival was similar between PPF and EPF. Multivariate analysis exhibited that tumor burden was significantly correlated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor burden is significantly correlated with survival in patients with R/M HNSCC. PD-L1 and TBS should be taken into consideration to determine first-line treatment.