Four-Month Rifapentine Regimens with or without Moxifloxacin for Tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Rifapentine-based regimens have potent antimycobacterial activity that may allow for a shorter course in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: In an open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial involving persons with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis from 13 countries, we compared two 4-month rifapentine-based regimens with a standard 6-month regimen consisting of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (control) using a noninferiority margin of 6.6 percentage points. In one 4-month regimen, rifampin was replaced with rifapentine; in the other, rifampin was replaced with rifapentine and ethambutol with moxifloxacin. The primary efficacy outcome was survival free of tuberculosis at 12 months. RESULTS: Among 2516 participants who had undergone randomization, 2343 had a culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis that was not resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, or fluoroquinolones (microbiologically eligible population; 768 in the control group, 791 in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 784 in the rifapentine group), of whom 194 were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and 1703 had cavitation on chest radiography. A total of 2234 participants could be assessed for the primary outcome (assessable population; 726 in the control group, 756 in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 752 in the rifapentine group). Rifapentine with moxifloxacin was noninferior to the control in the microbiologically eligible population (15.5% vs. 14.6% had an unfavorable outcome; difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.6 to 4.5) and in the assessable population (11.6% vs. 9.6%; difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 5.1). Noninferiority was shown in the secondary and sensitivity analyses. Rifapentine without moxifloxacin was not shown to be noninferior to the control in either population (17.7% vs. 14.6% with an unfavorable outcome in the microbiologically eligible population; difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.6 to 6.6]; and 14.2% vs. 9.6% in the assessable population; difference, 4.4 percentage points [95% CI, 1.2 to 7.7]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred during the on-treatment period in 19.3% of participants in the control group, 18.8% in the rifapentine-moxifloxacin group, and 14.3% in the rifapentine group. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of a 4-month rifapentine-based regimen containing moxifloxacin was noninferior to the standard 6-month regimen in the treatment of tuberculosis. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others; Study 31/A5349 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02410772.).

Tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment under uncertainty.

In 2017, 1.6 million people worldwide died from tuberculosis (TB). A new TB diagnostic test-Xpert MTB/RIF from Cepheid-was endorsed by the World Health Organization in 2010. Trials demonstrated that Xpert is faster and has greater sensitivity and specificity than smear microscopy-the most common sputum-based diagnostic test. However, subsequent trials found no impact of introducing Xpert on morbidity and mortality. We present a decision-theoretic model of how a clinician might decide whether to order Xpert or other tests for TB, and whether to treat a patient, with or without test results. Our first result characterizes the conditions under which it is optimal to perform empirical treatment; that is, treatment without diagnostic testing. We then examine the implications for decision making of partial knowledge of TB prevalence or test accuracy. This partial knowledge generates ambiguity, also known as deep uncertainty, about the best testing and treatment policy. In the presence of such ambiguity, we show the usefulness of diversification of testing and treatment.

Safety and Side Effects of Rifampin versus Isoniazid in Children.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is important in children because of their vulnerability to life-threatening forms of tuberculosis disease. The current standard treatment - 9 months of isoniazid - has been associated with poor adherence and toxic effects, which have hampered the effectiveness of the drug. In adults, treatment with 4 months of rifampin has been shown to be safer and to have higher completion rates than 9 months of isoniazid. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 844 children (<18 years of age) with latent M. tuberculosis infection to receive either 4 months of rifampin or 9 months of isoniazid. The primary outcome was adverse events of grade 1 to 5 that resulted in the permanent discontinuation of a trial drug. Secondary outcomes were treatment adherence, side-effect profile, and efficacy. Independent review panels whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments adjudicated all adverse events and progression to active tuberculosis. RESULTS: Of the children who underwent randomization, 829 were eligible for inclusion in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 360 of 422 children (85.3%) in the rifampin group completed per-protocol therapy, as compared with 311 of 407 (76.4%) in the isoniazid group (adjusted difference in the rates of treatment completion, 13.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5 to 19.3). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of adverse events, with fewer than 5% of the children in the combined groups with grade 1 or 2 adverse events that were deemed to be possibly related to a trial drug. Active tuberculosis, including 1 case with resistance to isoniazid, was diagnosed in 2 children in the isoniazid group during 542 person-years of follow-up, as compared with no cases in the rifampin group during 562 person-years (rate difference, -0.37 cases per 100 person-years; 95% CI, -0.88 to 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Among children under the age of 18 years, treatment with 4 months of rifampin had similar rates of safety and efficacy but a better rate of adherence than 9 months of treatment with isoniazid. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00170209 .).

Four Months of Rifampin or Nine Months of Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis in Adults.

BACKGROUND: A 9-month regimen of isoniazid can prevent active tuberculosis in persons with latent tuberculosis infection. However, the regimen has been associated with poor adherence rates and with toxic effects. METHODS: In an open-label trial conducted in nine countries, we randomly assigned adults with latent tuberculosis infection to receive treatment with a 4-month regimen of rifampin or a 9-month regimen of isoniazid for the prevention of confirmed active tuberculosis within 28 months after randomization. Noninferiority and potential superiority were assessed. Secondary outcomes included clinically diagnosed active tuberculosis, adverse events of grades 3 to 5, and completion of the treatment regimen. Outcomes were adjudicated by independent review panels. RESULTS: Among the 3443 patients in the rifampin group, confirmed active tuberculosis developed in 4 and clinically diagnosed active tuberculosis developed in 4 during 7732 person-years of follow-up, as compared with 4 and 5 patients, respectively, among 3416 patients in the isoniazid group during 7652 person-years of follow-up. The rate differences (rifampin minus isoniazid) were less than 0.01 cases per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.14 to 0.16) for confirmed active tuberculosis and less than 0.01 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.22) for confirmed or clinically diagnosed tuberculosis. The upper boundaries of the 95% confidence interval for the rate differences of the confirmed cases and for the confirmed or clinically diagnosed cases of tuberculosis were less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.75 percentage points in cumulative incidence; the rifampin regimen was not superior to the isoniazid regimen. The difference in the treatment-completion rates was 15.1 percentage points (95% CI, 12.7 to 17.4). The rate differences for adverse events of grade 3 to 5 occurring within 146 days (120% of the 4-month planned duration of the rifampin regimen) were -1.1 percentage points (95% CI, -1.9 to -0.4) for all events and -1.2 percentage points (95% CI, -1.7 to -0.7) for hepatotoxic events. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-month regimen of rifampin was not inferior to the 9-month regimen of isoniazid for the prevention of active tuberculosis and was associated with a higher rate of treatment completion and better safety. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00931736 .).

Tuberculosis in the intensive care unit: alternative treatment regimens and association with mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Adequate anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment is an important factor that can affect the patient's outcome. Higher mortality is found in patients who do not receive optimal treatment that includes isoniazid and rifampicin. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of use of alternative TB treatment regimens (without rifampicin and isoniazid) and mortality among patients requiring intensive care. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, from January 2010 to December 2018. Patients aged > 18 years with a TB diagnosis, admitted to the ICU of a general, tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital (Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA) were included. Data on TB treatment used and outcomes of treatment were collected. RESULTS: 462 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis; 284 used the usual treatment regimen (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol - all orally), and 178 used alternative treatment regimens (IV levofloxacin plus oral ethambutol plus IM streptomycin or IV amikacin, without rifampicin and isoniazid). The mortality was higher among users of alternative treatment regimens (63.5%) than among usual treatment regimen users (51.4%) (P = 0.011). In a multivariate analysis, age, albumin and death were independently associated with alternative treatment regimens use. CONCLUSIONS: TB programmes in which IV rifampicin is not widely available should consider including it, especially for critically ill TB patients, for whom there may be improved survival.

OBJECTIFS: Un traitement antituberculeux (TB) adéquat est un facteur important pouvant influencer les résultats du patient. Une mortalité plus élevée est observée chez les patients qui ne reçoivent pas un traitement optimal comprenant de l'isoniazide et de la rifampicine. L'objectif de cette étude est d'évaluer l'association entre l'utilisation d'autres schémas thérapeutiques anti-TB (sans rifampicine ni isoniazide) et la mortalité chez les patients nécessitant des soins intensifs. MÉTHODES: Etude de cohorte rétrospective, de janvier 2010 à décembre 2018. Les patients âgés de >18 ans avec un diagnostic de TB, admis à l'unité de soins intensifs d'un hôpital général, avec des soins tertiaires, affilié à l'Université (Hôpital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre-HCPA) ont été inclus. Des données sur le traitement anti-TB utilisé et les résultats du traitement ont été collectés. RÉSULTATS: 462 patients répondaient aux critères d'inclusion et ont été inclus dans l'analyse; 284 ont utilisé le schéma thérapeutique habituel (rifampicine, isoniazide, pyrazinamide et éthambutol - tous par voie orale) et 178 ont utilisé des schémas thérapeutiques alternatifs (lévofloxacine IV plus éthambutol oral plus streptomycine IM ou amikacine IV, sans rifampicine ni isoniazide). La mortalité était plus élevée chez les utilisateurs de schémas thérapeutiques alternatifs (63,5%) que chez les utilisateurs de schémas thérapeutiques habituels (51,4%) (P = 0,011). Dans l'analyse multivariée, l'âge, l'albumine et le décès ont été indépendamment associés à l'utilisation de schémas thérapeutiques alternatifs. CONCLUSIONS: Les programmes de lutte contre la TB dans lesquels la rifampicine IV n'est pas largement disponible devraient envisager de l'inclure, en particulier pour les patients atteints de TB et sévèrement malades, pour lesquels la survie peut être améliorée.

A case series of the rifampin-warfarin drug interaction: focus on practical warfarin management.

PURPOSE: To provide practical guidance by providing weekly descriptions of warfarin requirements for the onset and offset of the rifampin-warfarin interaction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review within an outpatient Anticoagulation Clinic (AC). Patients were eligible for the onset phase provided they had known ambulatory-based warfarin steady-state requirements prior to rifampin initiation. For the offset phase, warfarin must be managed by the AC following rifampin discontinuation. Each phase was described separately with warfarin proportionate dose changes (median, IQR) for weeks 1, 2, and 4 as well as the change required to reach warfarin steady state. RESULTS: Ten patients with 11 courses of warfarin-rifampin were included. For onset, clinicians should anticipate proportionate warfarin dose increases of 30-80% from week 1 to week 2 and a further 20-100% from week 2 to 4, with an overall warfarin dose increase of 165% (IQR 99, 227) to reach steady state at 30 days. For offset, clinicians should anticipate proportionate warfarin dose decreases of 15-25% for both week 1 and 2, and a further 20% for both week 3 and 4, resulting in an overall warfarin decrease of 67% (IQR - 70, - 58) to reach steady state at 4 weeks for most patients. CONCLUSION: Close monitoring with at least twice weekly INRs for weeks 1 to 2 of both phases is needed to respond to substantially changing warfarin dose requirements. While inter- and intra-patient variability for proportionate warfarin dose changes for both the onset and offset of this drug interaction exists, our data provides general guidance.

Experimental Solubility, Thermodynamic/Computational Validations, and GastroPlus-Based In Silico Prediction for Subcutaneous Delivery of Rifampicin.

We focused to explore a suitable solvent for rifampicin (RIF) recommended for subcutaneous (sub-Q) delivery [ethylene glycol (EG), propylene glycol (PG), tween 20, polyethylene glycol-400 (PEG400), oleic acid (OA), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), cremophor-EL (CEL), ethyl oleate (EO), methanol, and glycerol] followed by computational validations and in-silico prediction using GastroPlus. The experimental solubility was conducted over temperature ranges T = 298.2-318.2 K) and fixed pressure (p = 0.1 MPa) followed by validation employing computational models (Apelblat, and van't Hoff). Moreover, the HSPiP solubility software provided the Hansen solubility parameters. At T = 318.2K, the estimated maximum solubility (in term of mole fraction) values of the drug were in order of NMP (11.9 × 10-2) ˃ methanol (6.8 × 10-2) ˃ PEG400 (4.8 × 10-2) ˃ tween 20 (3.4 × 10-2). The drug dissolution was endothermic process and entropy driven as evident from "apparent thermodynamic analysis". The activity coefficients confirmed facilitated RIF-NMP interactions for increased solubility among them. Eventually, GastroPlus predicted the impact of critical input parameters on major pharmacokinetics responses after sub-Q delivery as compared to oral delivery. Thus, NMP may be the best solvent for sub-Q delivery of RIF to treat skin tuberculosis (local and systemic) and cutaneous related disease at explored concentration.

Intensified adjunctive corticosteroid therapy for CNS tuberculomas.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) tuberculomas are a challenging manifestation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis often leading to neurological complications and post-treatment sequelae. The role of adjunctive corticosteroid treatment is not fully understood. Most guidelines on management of tuberculosis do not distinguish between tuberculous meningitis and CNS tuberculomas in terms of corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: We describe five patients with CNS tuberculomas who required intensified dexamethasone treatment for several months, in two cases up to 18 months. RESULTS: These patients were initially treated with the standard four-drug tuberculosis regimen and adjuvant dexamethasone. Neurological symptoms improved rapidly. However, multiple attempts to reduce or discontinue corticosteroids according to guideline recommendations led to clinical deterioration with generalized seizures or new CNS lesions. Thus, duration of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy was extended eventually leading to clinical cure and resolution of lesions. CONCLUSION: In contrast to tuberculous meningitis, the treatment for CNS tuberculomas appears to require a prolonged administration of corticosteroids. These findings need to be verified in controlled clinical studies.

Pharmacokinetic study of two different rifabutin doses co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir in African HIV and tuberculosis co-infected adult patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of 150 mg rifabutin (RBT) taken every other day (every 48 h) versus 300 mg RBT taken every other day (E.O.D), both in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) co-infection. METHODS: This is a two-arm, open-label, pharmacokinetic, randomised study conducted in Burkina Faso between May 2013 and December 2015. Enrolled patients were randomised to receive either 150 mg RBT EOD (arm A, 9 subjects) or 300 mg RBT EOD (arm B, 7 subjects), both associated with LPV/r taken twice daily. RBT plasma concentrations were evaluated after 2 weeks of combined HIV and TB treatment. Samples were collected just before drug ingestion and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after drug ingestion to measure plasma drug concentration using an HPLC-MS/MS assay. RESULTS: The Cmax and AUC0-12h medians in arm A (Cmax = 296 ng/mL, IQR: 205-45; AUC0-12h = 2528 ng.h/mL, IQR: 1684-2735) were lower than those in arm B (Cmax = 600 ng/mL, IQR: 403-717; AUC0-12h = 4042.5 ng.h/mL, IQR: 3469-5761), with a statistically significant difference in AUC0-12h (p = 0.044) but not in Cmax (p = 0.313). No significant differences were observed in Tmax (3 h versus 4 h). Five patients had a Cmax below the plasma therapeutic limit (< 300 ng/mL) in the 150 mg RBT arm, while the Cmax was above this threshold for all patients in the 300 mg RBT arm. Additionally, at 48 h after drug ingestion, all patients had a mycobacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) above the limit (> 64 ng/mL) in the 300 mg RBT arm, while 4/9 patients had such values in the 150 mg RBT arm. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that the 150 mg dose of rifabutin ingested EOD in combination with LPV/r is inadequate and could lead to selection of rifamycin-resistant mycobacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR201310000629390, 28th October 2013.

Addressing Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment Through a Collaborative Care Model With Community Pharmacies and a Health Department.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel collaborative care model using community pharmacies as additional access points for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment for patients using combination weekly therapy with isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) plus directly observed therapy for 12 weeks. METHODS: This prospective pilot study included adult patients diagnosed with LTBI. Patients were eligible for study participation if they spoke English or Spanish and were followed by the New Mexico Department of Health (NM DOH). Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, receiving concomitant HIV antiretroviral therapy, or had contraindications to 3HP due to allergy or drug interactions. Community pharmacy sites included chain, independent, and hospital outpatient pharmacies in Albuquerque and Santa Fe, New Mexico. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients initiated treatment with 3HP and were included. Most were female (55%) and had a mean age of 46 years (standard deviation, 12.6 y). A total of 75.0% of patients completed LTBI treatment with 3HP in a community pharmacy site. Individuals of Hispanic ethnicity were more likely to complete treatment (76.7% vs 40.0%, P = .04). Most patients (60%; n = 24) reported experiencing an adverse drug event (ADE) with 3HP therapy. Patients who completed treatment were less likely to experience an ADE than patients who discontinued treatment (50.0% vs 90.0%, P = .03). Pharmacists performed 398 LTBI treatment visits (40 initial visits, 358 follow-up visits), saving the NM DOH approximately 143 hours in patient contact time. CONCLUSION: High completion rates and safe administration of LTBI treatment can be achieved in the community pharmacy setting.

Treatment-Shortening Effect of a Novel Regimen Combining Clofazimine and High-Dose Rifapentine in Pathologically Distinct Mouse Models of Tuberculosis.

Clofazimine and high-dose rifapentine have each separately been associated with treatment-shortening activity when incorporated into tuberculosis (TB) treatment regimens. We hypothesized that both modifications, i.e., the addition of clofazimine and the replacement of rifampin with high-dose rifapentine, in the first-line regimen for drug-susceptible TB would significantly shorten the duration of treatment necessary for cure. We tested this hypothesis in a well-established BALB/c mouse model of TB chemotherapy and also in a C3HeB/FeJ mouse model in which mice can develop caseous necrotic lesions, an environment where rifapentine and clofazimine may individually be less effective. In both mouse models, replacing rifampin with high-dose rifapentine and adding clofazimine in the first-line regimen resulted in greater bactericidal and sterilizing activity than either modification alone, suggesting that a rifapentine- and clofazimine-containing regimen may have the potential to significantly shorten the treatment duration for drug-susceptible TB. These data provide preclinical evidence supporting the evaluation of regimens combining high-dose rifapentine and clofazimine in clinical trials.

Adjunctive rifampicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (ARREST): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common cause of severe community-acquired and hospital-acquired infection worldwide. We tested the hypothesis that adjunctive rifampicin would reduce bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death, by enhancing early S aureus killing, sterilising infected foci and blood faster, and reducing risks of dissemination and metastatic infection. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (≥18 years) with S aureus bacteraemia who had received ≤96 h of active antibiotic therapy were recruited from 29 UK hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequential randomisation list to receive 2 weeks of adjunctive rifampicin (600 mg or 900 mg per day according to weight, oral or intravenous) versus identical placebo, together with standard antibiotic therapy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, investigators, and those caring for the patients were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was time to bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death (all-cause), from randomisation to 12 weeks, adjudicated by an independent review committee masked to the treatment. Analysis was intention to treat. This trial was registered, number ISRCTN37666216, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2012, and Oct 25, 2016, 758 eligible participants were randomly assigned: 370 to rifampicin and 388 to placebo. 485 (64%) participants had community-acquired S aureus infections, and 132 (17%) had nosocomial S aureus infections. 47 (6%) had meticillin-resistant infections. 301 (40%) participants had an initial deep infection focus. Standard antibiotics were given for 29 (IQR 18-45) days; 619 (82%) participants received flucloxacillin. By week 12, 62 (17%) of participants who received rifampicin versus 71 (18%) who received placebo experienced treatment failure or disease recurrence, or died (absolute risk difference -1·4%, 95% CI -7·0 to 4·3; hazard ratio 0·96, 0·68-1·35, p=0·81). From randomisation to 12 weeks, no evidence of differences in serious (p=0·17) or grade 3-4 (p=0·36) adverse events were observed; however, 63 (17%) participants in the rifampicin group versus 39 (10%) in the placebo group had antibiotic or trial drug-modifying adverse events (p=0·004), and 24 (6%) versus six (2%) had drug interactions (p=0·0005). INTERPRETATION: Adjunctive rifampicin provided no overall benefit over standard antibiotic therapy in adults with S aureus bacteraemia. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

Protein binding of rifampicin is not saturated when using high-dose rifampicin.

BACKGROUND: Higher doses of rifampicin are being investigated as a means to optimize response to this pivotal TB drug. It is unknown whether high-dose rifampicin results in saturation of plasma protein binding and a relative increase in protein-unbound (active) drug concentrations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the free fraction of rifampicin based on an in vitro experiment and data from a clinical trial on high-dose rifampicin. METHODS: Protein-unbound rifampicin concentrations were measured in human serum spiked with increasing total concentrations (up to 64 mg/L) of rifampicin and in samples obtained by intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of patients who used standard (10 mg/kg daily) or high-dose (35 mg/kg) rifampicin up to steady-state. The performance of total AUC0-24 to predict unbound AUC0-24 was evaluated. RESULTS: The in vitro free fraction of rifampicin remained unaltered (∼9%) up to 21 mg/L and increased up to 13% at 41 mg/L and 17% at 64 mg/L rifampicin. The highest (peak) concentration in vivo was 39.1 mg/L (high-dose group). The arithmetic mean percentage unbound to total AUC0-24in vivo was 13.3% (range = 8.1%-24.9%) and 11.1% (range = 8.6%-13.6%) for the standard group and the high-dose group, respectively (P = 0.214). Prediction of unbound AUC0-24 based on total AUC0-24 resulted in a bias of -0.05% and an imprecision of 13.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma protein binding of rifampicin can become saturated, but exposures after high-dose rifampicin are not high enough to increase the free fraction in TB patients with normal albumin values. Unbound rifampicin exposures can be predicted from total exposures, even in the higher dose range.

Rifampicin effect on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide.

OBJECTIVES: Tenofovir alafenamide produces lower plasma tenofovir and higher intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (DP) concentrations than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate but it is likely a victim of interactions with rifampicin. We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine with rifampicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers received tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine at 25/200 mg once daily, followed by tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin daily followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Plasma tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir, emtricitabine and intracellular tenofovir-DP and emtricitabine triphosphate pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphisms were assessed. RESULTS: Tenofovir alafenamide exposure decreased when tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin was used compared with tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI): 0.45 (0.33-0.60)]. Plasma tenofovir and intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations decreased with rifampicin [GMR (90% CI): 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.64 (0.54-0.75), respectively]. GMR (90% CI) of intracellular tenofovir-DP AUC0-24 for tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was 4.21 (2.98-5.95). Rifampicin did not affect emtricitabine pharmacokinetics. CYP3A4*22 rs35599367 was associated with higher plasma tenofovir alafenamide AUC0-24 at day 56. CONCLUSIONS: Following tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine administration with rifampicin, intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations were still 4.21-fold higher than those achieved by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, supporting further study during HIV/TB co-infection.

Pharmacokinetics of adjusted-dose 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children co-treated with rifampicin.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the proportion of children with lopinavir Cmin ≥1 mg/L when receiving a novel 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir dosing strategy during rifampicin co-treatment. METHODS: HIV-infected children on lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin were enrolled in a prospective pharmacokinetic study. Children were switched from standard-of-care lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 with additional ritonavir (1:1 ratio) twice daily to 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 using weight-banded dosing. Rifampicin was dosed at 10-20 mg/kg/day. After 2 weeks, plasma samples were collected ∼2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 h after the morning lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 dose, ALT was obtained to assess safety and treatment was switched back to standard of care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01637558. RESULTS: We recruited 11 children in two weight bands: 5 (45%) were 10-13.9 kg and received 20-24 mg/kg/dose of lopinavir and 6 (55%) children weighed 6-9.9 kg and received 20-23 mg/kg/dose of lopinavir. The median age was 15 months (IQR = 12.6-28.8 months). The median (IQR) lopinavir Cmin was 3.0 (0.1-5.5) mg/L. Seven (63.6%) of the 11 children had Cmin values ≥1 mg/L. Children with a lopinavir mg/kg dose below the median 21.5 were more likely to have Cmin <1 mg/L (P = 0.02). There was a strong positive correlation between lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations. No associations were found between lopinavir AUC2-10 and age, sex, weight, nutritional status or mg/kg/dose of lopinavir. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the use of 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir at studied doses. Evaluation of higher doses is needed to optimize treatment outcomes of TB and HIV in young children.

Safety and efficacy of rifabutin among HIV/TB-coinfected children on lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART.

BACKGROUND: TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected children, yet treatment options for those who require PI-based ART are suboptimal. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PI-based ART; only one study has evaluated its use among children on PIs and two of six children developed treatment-limiting neutropenia. METHODS: Since 2009, rifabutin has been available for HIV/TB-coinfected children requiring PI-based ART in the Harvard/APIN programme in Nigeria. We retrospectively analysed laboratory and clinical toxicities at baseline and during rifabutin therapy, and examined HIV/TB outcomes. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2015, 48 children received rifabutin-containing TB therapy with PI (lopinavir/ritonavir)-based ART: 50% were female with a median (IQR) baseline age of 1.7 (0.9-5.0) years and a median (IQR) CD4+ cell percentage of 15% (9%-25%); 52% were ART experienced. Eighty-five percent completed the 6 month rifabutin course with resolution of TB symptoms and 79% were retained in care at 12 months. Adverse events (grade 1-4) were more common at baseline (27%) than during rifabutin treatment (15%) (P = 0.006). Absolute neutrophil count was lower during rifabutin compared with baseline (median = 1762 versus 2976 cells/mm3, respectively), but only one instance (2%) of grade 3 neutropenia occurred during rifabutin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: With clinical and laboratory monitoring, our data suggest that rifabutin is a safe option for TB therapy among children on PI-based ART. By contrast with the only other study of this combination in children, severe neutropenia was rare. Furthermore, outcomes from this cohort suggest that rifabutin is effective, and a novel option for children who require PI-based ART. Additional study of rifabutin plus PIs in children is urgently needed.

Steady-state population pharmacokinetics of terizidone and its metabolite cycloserine in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

AIMS: Despite terizidone being part of the second-line recommended drugs for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), information on its pharmacokinetics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe the steady-state population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of terizidone and its primary metabolite cycloserine in patients with DR-TB and determine the effect of patient characteristics. METHODS: This clinical study involved 39 adult DR-TB patients admitted to Brewelskloof Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa for intensive treatment phase. Blood samples were collected at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours after drug administration. The estimation of PPK parameters was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software Monolix 2018R1. Free-fat mass was used to perform allometric scaling on disposition parameters. RESULTS: A 1-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics of terizidone and cycloserine. A modified transit compartment model described the absorption of terizidone. The parameters of terizidone model were mean transit time (1.7 h), absorption rate constant (2.97 h-1 ), apparent volume of distribution (Vp/F: 13.4 L) and apparent total clearance (0.51 L h-1 ). In the joint model, apparent fraction of terizidone converted to cycloserine was 0.29 while apparent clearance of terizidone via other routes and apparent cycloserine clearance was 0.1 L h-1 and 2.94 L h-1 , respectively. Serum albumin had significant effect on Vp/F. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PPK model described well the concentration-time profile for terizidone and cycloserine in DR-TB patients. High albumin concentration was associated with low Vp/F.

Individualised dosing algorithm and personalised treatment of high-dose rifampicin for tuberculosis.

AIMS: To propose new exposure targets for Bayesian dose optimisation suited for high-dose rifampicin and to apply them using measured plasma concentrations coupled with a Bayesian forecasting algorithm allowing predictions of future doses, considering rifampicin's auto-induction, saturable pharmacokinetics and high interoccasion variability. METHODS: Rifampicin exposure targets for Bayesian dose optimisation were defined based on literature data on safety and anti-mycobacterial activity in relation to rifampicin's pharmacokinetics i.e. highest plasma concentration up to 24 hours and area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to 24 hours (AUC0-24h ). Targets were suggested with and without considering minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) information. Individual optimal doses were predicted for patients treated with rifampicin (10 mg/kg) using the targets with Bayesian forecasting together with sparse measurements of rifampicin plasma concentrations and baseline rifampicin MIC. RESULTS: The suggested exposure target for Bayesian dose optimisation was a steady state AUC0-24h of 181-214 h × mg/L. The observed MICs ranged from 0.016-0.125 mg/L (mode: 0.064 mg/L). The predicted optimal dose in patients using the suggested target ranged from 1200-3000 mg (20-50 mg/kg) with a mode of 1800 mg (30 mg/kg, n = 24). The predicted optimal doses when taking MIC into account were highly dependent on the known technical variability of measured individual MIC and the dose was substantially lower compared to when using the AUC0-24h -only target. CONCLUSIONS: A new up-to-date exposure target for Bayesian dose optimisation suited for high-dose rifampicin was derived. Using measured plasma concentrations coupled with Bayesian forecasting allowed prediction of the future dose whilst accounting for the auto-induction, saturable pharmacokinetics and high between-occasion variability of rifampicin.

Tuberculosis-HIV treatment with rifampicin or rifabutin: are the outcomes different?

BACKGROUND: Rifamycins are a group of antibiotics mainly used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), however they interact with antiretroviral therapy (ART). Rifabutin allows more regimens options for concomitant imunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment compared to rifampicin. OBJECTIVE: Compare the outcomes of TB-HIV co-infected patients who used rifampicin or rifabutin. METHODS: We analysed data from a prospective cohort study at National Institute of Infectious Diseases Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. Patients who were treated for TB and HIV with rifampicin or rifabutin, from February 2011 to September 2016 were included. FINDINGS: There were 130 TB-HIV patients, of whom 102 were treated with rifampicin and 28 with rifabutin. All patients in the rifabutin-treated group and 55% of the rifampicin-treated group patients were ART-experienced. Patients treated with rifampicin had similar abandon and cure rates, interruptions in treatment due to adverse reactions, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and a similar mortality rate as those treated with rifabutin. However, rifampicin-treated patients had higher CD4 counts and more frequently undetectable HIV viral load by the end of treatment (67% versus 18%, p < 0.001) compared to rifabutin-treated patients, even when only ART-experienced patients were evaluated (66,6% versus 36,3%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who used rifabutin had worst immune and virological control. This group had more ART-experienced patients. New and simpler regimens are needed for patients who do not respond to previous antiretroviral therapies.

Promising Chitosan-Coated Alginate-Tween 80 Nanoparticles as Rifampicin Coadministered Ascorbic Acid Delivery Carrier Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The aim of this study was to design a nanocarrier system for inhalation delivery of rifampicin (RIF) in combination with ascorbic acid (ASC), namely constituted of sodium alginate coated with chitosan and Tween 80 (RIF/ASC NPs) as a platform for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis infection. A Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology (RSM) were applied to elucidate and evaluate the effects of several factors on the nanoparticle properties. On the other hand, it was found that RIF/ASC NPs were less cytotoxic than the free RIF, showing a significantly improved activity against nine clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) in comparison with the free drug. RIF/ASC NPs had an average particle size of 324.0 ± 40.7 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.226 ± 0.030, and a zeta potential of - 28.52 ± 0.47 mV and the surface was hydrophilic. The addition of sucrose (1% w/v) to the nanosuspension resulted in the formation of a solid pellet easily redispersible after lyophilization. RIF/ASC NPs were found to be stable at different physiological pH values. In summary, findings of this work highlight the potential of the RIF/ASC NP-based formulation development herein to deliver RIF in combination with ASC through pulmonary route by exploring a non-invasive route of administration of this antibiotic, increasing the local drug concentrations in lung tissues, the primary infection site, as well as reducing the risk of systemic toxicity and hence improving the patient compliance.