Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 473(9): 2856-64, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25825157

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments for implant-associated infections are often lacking. Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation has shown potential as a treatment of implant-associated infections of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The primary purpose of this study was to (1) determine if cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation combined with vancomycin therapy is more effective at reducing the MRSA bacterial burden on the implant, bone, and synovial fluid in comparison to either treatment alone or no treatment controls. We also sought to (2) evaluate the histologic effects of the various treatments on the surrounding bone; and to (3) determine if the cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation treatment had an effect on the mechanical properties of the titanium implant as a result of possible hydrogen embrittlement. METHODS: Thirty-two adult male Long-Evans rats (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA) with surgically placed shoulder titanium implants were infected with a clinical strain of MRSA (NRS70). One week after infection, eight animals received a treatment of cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation at -1.8 V versus Ag/AgCl for 1 hour (STIM), eight received vancomycin twice daily for 1 week (VANCO), eight received the cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation and vancomycin therapy combined (STIM + VANCO), and eight served as controls with no treatment (CONT). Two weeks after initial infection, the implant, bone, and synovial fluid were collected for colony-forming unit (CFU) enumeration, qualitative histological analysis by a pathologist blinded to the treatments each animal received, and implant three-point bend testing. RESULTS: The implant-associated CFU enumerated from the STIM + VANCO (mean, 3.7 × 10(3); SD, 6.3 × 10(3)) group were less than those from the CONT (mean, 1.3 × 10(6); SD, 2.8 × 10(6); 95% confidence interval [CI] of difference, -4.3 × 10(5) to -9.9 × 10(3); p < 0.001), STIM (mean, 1.4 × 10(6); SD, 2.0 × 10(6); 95% CI of difference, -2.1 × 10(6) to -1.8 × 10(3); p = 0.002), and VANCO (mean, 5.8 x 10(4); SD, 5.7 × 10(4); 95% CI of difference, -6.4 × 10(4) to -1.7 × 10(4); p < 0.001) group. The bone-associated CFU enumerated from the STIM + VANCO group (6.3 × 10(1); SD, 1.1 × 10(2)) were less than those from the CONT (mean, 2.8 × 10(5); SD, 4.8 × 10(5); 95% CI of difference, -9.4 × 10(4) to -5.0 × 10(3); p < 0.001) and STIM (mean, 2.6 × 10(4); SD, 2.5 × 10(4); 95% CI of difference, -4.1 × 10(4) to -1.6 × 10(3); p < 0.001) groups. The VANCO group (4.3 × 10(5); SD, 6.3 × 10(2)) also had lower bone-associated CFU as compared with the CONT (mean 95% CI of difference, -9.3 × 10(4) to -4.5 × 10(3); p < 0.001) and STIM (95% CI of difference, -4.0 × 10(4) to -1.5 × 10(3); p < 0.001) groups. In comparison to the synovial fluid CFU enumerated from the CONT group (mean, 3.3 × 10(4); SD, 6.0 × 10(4)), lower synovial CFU were reported for both the STIM + VANCO group (mean, 4.6 × 10(1); SD, 1.2 × 10(2); 95% CI of difference, -4.9 × 10(3) to -3.0 × 10(2); p < 0.001) and the VANCO group (mean, 6.8 × 10(1); SD, 9.2 × 10(1); 95% CI of difference, -4.9 × 10(3) to -2.8 × 10(2); p = 0.007). The histological analysis showed no discernable deleterious effects on the surrounding tissue as a result of the treatments. No brittle fracture occurred during mechanical testing and with the numbers available, no differences in implant flexural yield strength were detected between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this rodent model, cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation combined with vancomycin is an effective treatment for titanium implant-associated infections showing greater than 99.8% reduction in bacterial burden on the implant, surrounding bone, and synovial fluid as compared with the controls and the stimulation alone groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation combined with vancomycin may enable successful treatment of titanium orthopaedic implant-associated infections with implant retention. Future studies will focus on optimization of the stimulation parameters for complete eradication of infection and the ability to promote beneficial host tissue responses.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Artroplastia de Substituição/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Substituição/instrumentação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Cabeça do Úmero/efeitos dos fármacos , Prótese Articular , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Animais , Carga Bacteriana , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Terapia Combinada , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Eletrodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Cabeça do Úmero/microbiologia , Cabeça do Úmero/patologia , Cabeça do Úmero/cirurgia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Desenho de Prótese , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/patologia , Ratos Long-Evans , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/patologia , Líquido Sinovial/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Titânio
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666085

RESUMO

A 17-year-old male adolescent was diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma arising from the right humeral head. The lymphoma was found to be isolated to the bone, with a very small extraosseous component. After completion of a standard chemotherapy regimen, the Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) became PET negative but the CT and MRI appeared mostly unchanged in appearance, suggesting refractory disease. Repeat biopsy confirmed that no lymphoma remained, and he was in complete remission. Three months after completion of therapy, MRI continued to be abnormal. This case illustrates the unique challenges posed by the imaging characteristics of bone lymphoma, both during and after therapy. Biopsy is definitive but causes additional morbidity and may not be necessary. Imaging is done routinely to assess response to therapy, as with this patient, but in lymphomas of the bone imaging can be misleading and can lead to unnecessary procedures or follow-up imaging.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Cabeça do Úmero/patologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma não Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Cabeça do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Cabeça do Úmero/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/patologia , Masculino , Osteonecrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteonecrose/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA