Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 99
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circulation ; 143(24): 2395-2405, 2021 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125564

RESUMO

In the United States, race-based disparities in cardiovascular disease care have proven to be pervasive, deadly, and expensive. African American/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Native/Indigenous American individuals are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and are less likely to receive high-quality, evidence-based medical care as compared with their White American counterparts. Although the United States population is diverse, the cardiovascular workforce that provides its much-needed care lacks diversity. The available data show that care provided by physicians from racially diverse backgrounds is associated with better quality, both for minoritized patients and for majority patients. Not only is cardiovascular workforce diversity associated with improvements in health care quality, but racial diversity among academic teams and research scientists is linked with research quality. We outline documented barriers to achieving workforce diversity and suggest evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers. Key strategies to enhance racial diversity in cardiology include improving recruitment and retention of racially diverse members of the cardiology workforce and focusing on cardiovascular health equity for patients. This review draws attention to academic institutions, but the implications should be considered relevant for nonacademic and community settings as well.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Equidade em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Raciais , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
2.
Int Heart J ; 62(3): 592-600, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34054000

RESUMO

The clinical evidence is accumulating since 2015 that anti-diabetic sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have the beneficial effect of cardiovascular and, recently, renal protection. Although it is not well analyzed how the transfer of this new evidence into daily practice has expedited, we hypothesize that the recent usage of the drugs is positively associated with several certified cardiologists in each region.The 2016 annual and 2016-2017 increased number of SGLT2 inhibitor tablets, based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, were divided by the estimated number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for each of the 47 prefectures. Then, regression analyses were performed to investigate the potential association of the number of certified cardiologists with the drug prescription.The 2016 prescription of ipragliflozin, dapagliflozin, luseogliflozin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin was 2.7- to 4.4-fold different between prefectures. The 2016-2017 increased prescription volume also varied among prefectures by as large as 7.3-fold for ipragliflozin. Regression analysis revealed that the annual and increased prescription volume of all the SGLT2 inhibitors except luseogliflozin were higher in regions with more certified cardiologists (P < 0.05), even after adjusting for regional parameters.In conclusion, the regional number of certified cardiologists was positively associated with a 2016 annual of and 2016-2017 increase in SGLT2 inhibitor prescription amount, implying an early adopter role of clinical experts in healthcare delivery.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Compostos Benzidrílicos/farmacologia , Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Canagliflozina/farmacologia , Canagliflozina/uso terapêutico , Sistema Cardiovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Análise de Dados , Feminino , Glucosídeos/farmacologia , Glucosídeos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/farmacologia , Sorbitol/análogos & derivados , Sorbitol/farmacologia , Sorbitol/uso terapêutico , Tiofenos/farmacologia , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico
3.
Med Care ; 58(11): 996-1003, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For decades, the prevailing assumption regarding the diffusion of high-cost medical technologies has been that competitive markets favor more aggressive adoption of new treatments by health care providers (ie, the "Medical Arms Race"). However, novel regulations governing the adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may have disrupted this paradigm when TAVR was introduced. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the market concentration of physician group practices and the adoption of TAVR in its first years of use. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Physician group practices (n=5116) providing interventional cardiology services in the United States from May 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014. MEASURES: The first use of TAVR as indicated by a fee-for-service Medicare claim. Covariates including characteristics of the physician groups (ie, case volume, hospital affiliation, mean patient risk) as well as county-level and market-level characteristics. RESULTS: By the close of 2014, 9.3% of practices had adopted TAVR. Cox proportional hazards models revealed a hazard ratio of 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.37, P<0.001) per 1000 point increase in the physician group practice Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, indicating each 1000 point increase in group practice Herfindahl-Hirschman Index was associated with a 26% relative increase in the rate of TAVR adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of TAVR by physician groups in concentrated markets was potentially a consequence of the unique regulations governing TAVR reimbursement, which favored the adoption of TAVR by physician groups with greater market power. These findings have important implications for how future regulations may shape patterns of technology adoption.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Competição Econômica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
4.
Dermatol Surg ; 46(12): 1560-1563, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32604236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the risk of perioperative myocardial infarctions (MIs) in patients with a recent MI who undergo dermatologic surgeries. OBJECTIVE: Present the recommendations of dermatologic surgeons and cardiologists to determine the safety of dermatologic surgeries after a recent MI. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to Mohs surgeons and cardiologists to infer the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) inherent to dermatologic surgery and determine timing of dermatologic surgery in patients with a recent MI. RESULTS: One hundred twenty Mohs surgeons and 30 cardiologists were surveyed. Ninety-seven percent of cardiologists and 87% of Mohs surgeons deemed cutaneous excisions and Mohs micrographic surgery as low-risk procedures with less than one-percent chance of MACE. Seventy-seven percent of cardiologists and 46% of Mohs surgeons stated dermatologic surgery should either not be delayed or be delayed up to 1 month after an MI. Responses between cardiologists and Mohs surgeons did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION: A preponderance of surveyed experts believe that most dermatologic surgeries may be safely performed in patients with a history of an MI within 1 month. The decision to implement urgent dermatologic surgery in patients with a recent MI should account for all clinically significant factors.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Cirurgia de Mohs/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prova Pericial/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cirurgia de Mohs/normas , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Recidiva , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(9): e13531, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459398

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pharmacists' interventions (PI) on the potential clinical impact of medication errors, including the lack of therapeutic optimisation of patients with cardiologic diseases, such as heart failure and acute coronary syndrome). METHODS: This was an observational, prospective study conducted in the cardiology department of a French university hospital centre for a duration of 9 months. All prescriptions were analysed and PI were registered for clinical rating by pharmacists and cardiologist. RESULTS: A total of 532 PI cases were recorded in 339 patients, with a mean of 1.57 (±1.04) PI. The PI acceptance rate was 98.1%. "Dose adjustment" and "introduction therapy" were the most common interventions and represented 38.0% and 32.9%, respectively, of all PI. Statins were the most frequently involved drugs (18.1%), followed by ACE (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme) inhibitors (10.9%) and antiplatelet agents (9.3%). Moreover, 13.8% of PI potentially avoided a severe or very severe clinical impact (n = 71) and 38.6% had a significant impact altering the quality of life (n = 198). There was no significant difference between the average score performed by the clinical pharmacist included in the cardiology team and the one obtained by the cardiologist (P = .797). In contrast, a significant difference was observed for the average score established by the pharmacist localised in central pharmacy versus the rating of the cardiologist (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration between clinical pharmacists and cardiologists in the medical units seems to be beneficial to the quality of prescriptions, including the implementation of recommendations. The good rate of PI acceptance and the similar rating with the cardiologist show that there is a change in perspective of the pharmacist, being closer to the clinical reality.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Estudos Prospectivos
6.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 45(4): 342-352, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30299382

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital-physician vertical integration involving employment of physicians has increased considerably over the last decade. Cardiologists are one group of specialists being increasingly employed by hospitals. Although hospital-physician integration has the potential to produce economic and societal benefits, there is concern that this consolidation may reduce competition and concentrate bargaining power among providers. In addition, hospitals may be motivated to offer cardiologists higher compensation and reduced workloads as an incentive to integrate. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine if there are differences in compensation and clinical productivity, measured by work relative value units (RVUs), for cardiologists as they transition from being independent practitioners to being employed by hospitals. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study was a quantitative, retrospective, longitudinal analysis, comparing the compensation and work RVUs of integrated cardiologists to their compensation and work RVUs as independent cardiologists. Data from the MedAxiom Annual Survey from 2010 to 2014 were used. Participants included 4,830 unique cardiologists that provided 13,642 pooled physician-year observations, with ownership status, compensation, work (RVUs), and other characteristics as variables for analysis. RESULTS: Results from the multivariate regressions indicate that average compensation for cardiologists increases by $129,263.1 (p < .001) when they move from independent to integrated practice. At the same time, physician work RVUs decline by 398.04 (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the conjecture that hospitals may be offering higher pay and lower workloads to incentivize cardiologists to integrate. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Although hospitals may have goals of quality improvement and lower costs, such goals may presently be secondary to service line growth and increased market power. There is reason to be cautious about some of the implications of hospital integration of cardiologists.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/economia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Salários e Benefícios , Adulto , Cardiologistas/economia , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Salários e Benefícios/economia , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
7.
Clin Nephrol ; 92(5): 226-232, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31496513

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered a standard of care, but for hemodialysis (HD) patients the benefits are unclear, and bleeding risks are high. Our study objective was to compare cardiologists' and nephrologists' stroke prevention practices in different patient risk scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to members of three Canadian physician societies (Nephrology, Cardiovascular, Heart Rhythm), and to cardiologists affiliated with three Canadian Universities. The questionnaire included four AF scenarios in HD patients with varying stroke and bleeding risks. Physicians selected one of six antithrombotic therapy options for each scenario. RESULTS: Cardiologists were 3 times more likely than nephro-logists to choose anticoagulant therapy over both antiplatelet and no drug therapy, regardless of stroke or bleeding risk (p < 0.001). Physicians' drug therapy choices in regards to level of stroke and bleeding risk reflected the expected pattern based on current evidence. CONCLUSION: Cardiologists were more likely to prescribe anticoagulant therapy for AF in the HD population compared to nephrologists, regardless of patient stroke or bleeding risk.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Humanos
8.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 89(1)2019 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968657

RESUMO

A key factor in cardiovascular prevention is the detection and appropriate management of preclinical heart failure (HF), but information on the subject is scarce. We designed VASTISSIMO as a prospective, observational study to investigate Outpatient Clinic Cardiologists' skills in detecting and managing preclinical HF in Italy. Quality scores were used to assess the appropriateness of clinical management according to guideline recommendations. The feasibility of making a diagnosis of preclinical HF in a cardiology outpatient clinical setting, cardiologists' awareness of preclinical HF and consistency between physician's perceived risk of HF and the patient's classification into the preclinical HF Stages A [(SAHF) or B (SBHF)] have been investigated. Consistency was defined acceptable if the concordance between perceived risk and actual risk was >70%. Out of 3322 patients included in the study data necessary for identifying SBHF were collected in 2106 (63.4%). Many SBHF patients had their risk underestimated: 16.2% of those with previous acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 23.1% with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) at ECG/echocardiography, 30% with systolic/diastolic dysfunction, and 14.3% with valve disease. Cardiologists' awareness of preclinical HF in the outpatient setting should be improved. This is a critical area of cardiovascular prevention that requires attention to improve good clinical practice and adherence to guidelines.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Cardiologistas/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Competência Clínica , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(4): 482-485, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305114

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and retrieval rates among radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, other surgeons, and all other health care providers for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the years 2012-2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nationwide Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files were used to determine the volume and utilization rate of IVC filter placement, IVC filter repositioning, and IVC filter retrieval, which correspond to procedure codes 37191, 37192, and 37193, respectively. Procedural code 37193 was not available before 2012, so data were reviewed for the years 2012-2015. RESULTS: The total volume of Medicare IVC filter placement decreased from 57,785 in 2012 to 44,378 in 2015, with radiologists responsible for 60% of all filter placements. Volume of IVC filter placement declined across all specialties, including radiologists, who placed 33,744 in 2012 and 27,957 in 2015. In contrast, total retrieval of IVC filters increased from 4,060 removals in 2012 to 6,166 in 2015. Retrieval rate per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased from 11 in 2012 to 16 in 2015. Radiologists removed the bulk of the filters: 64% in both 2012 and 2015. Vascular surgeons, cardiologists, and other surgeons retrieved, respectively, 20%, 10%, and 5% of all IVC filters in 2012 and 22%, 9%, and 5% in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: From 2012 to 2015, IVC filter placement steadily decreased across all specialties. Retrieval rate of IVC filters continued to rise over the same period. Radiologists were responsible for the majority of IVC filter placements and retrievals.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Radiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior , Idoso , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Crit Care Med ; 45(12): e1292-e1296, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023259

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the characteristics of U.S. physicians who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded cardiologists"). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study using a comprehensive database of licensed U.S. physicians linked to Medicare claims. SETTING: The United States. SUBJECTS: Dual-boarded cardiologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used a comprehensive physician database to identify all physicians who were board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine before July 2015. We assessed physicians' characteristics and compared dual-boarded cardiologists with and without active board certification in critical care medicine and estimated the maximum proportion of 2014 Medicare Cardiac ICU admissions treated by dual-boarded cardiologists. Among 473 dual-boarded cardiologists, 16 (3.4%) were women; 468 (99%) and 85 (18%) maintained active board certification in cardiology and critical care medicine, respectively. Overall, 98 dual-boarded cardiologists (21%) submitted 1,215 total claims for critical care services in 2014. Compared to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification in critical care medicine, those with active certification had more publications (median publications: 6.5 vs 3.0; p = 0.002), were more likely to be professors (22.3% vs 9.5%; p = 0.003), and were more likely to bill Medicare for critical care services (29% vs 17.8%; p = 0.002). We estimated that no more than 0.47% of all 2014 Medicare Cardiac ICU admissions were treated by a dual-boarded cardiologist. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-boarded cardiologists appear to deliver a small proportion of all Cardiac ICU services received by Medicare beneficiaries. Optimizing the modern Cardiac ICU workforce will require greater efforts to promote and support the training of dual-boarded cardiologists.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Certificação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
13.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 46(6): 527-34, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27018993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiologists who frequently perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are exposed to high levels of radiation; therefore, their risk of cancer may be higher compared with other internists or cardiologists who perform fewer PCIs. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for the 2000-2011 period. A cohort of 542 cardiologists was randomly frequency-matched according to age and sex with four other internists to form a cohort of noncardiologist controls. The incidence of cancer was measured for both cohorts, who were followed up until the end of 2011. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to analyse the risk of cancer between cardiologist and control cohorts. RESULTS: In general, the cardiologists did not have a higher risk of cancer compared with the other internists. However, the cardiologists who worked in medical centres or regional hospitals had a higher risk of cancer than did the other internists in the same work settings. Furthermore, the cardiologists working in medical centres or regional hospitals (large hospitals) who performed >15 PCIs per year had a higher risk of cancer than did those working in district hospitals (small hospitals) or clinics who performed ≤15 PCIs per year. CONCLUSION: Cardiologists who frequently perform PCIs have a higher risk of cancer compared with other internists or cardiologists who perform relatively fewer PCIs. Protection from radiation exposure should therefore be emphasized in coronary catheterization laboratories.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Proteção Radiológica , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan/epidemiologia
14.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 39(8): 843-7, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27226114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been an increasing number of internal medicine-trained electrophysiologists who choose not to test for acute defibrillation efficacy during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. It is not known whether this same trend is seen in pediatric electrophysiologists, who care primarily for patients with congenital heart disease or primary electrical problems. METHODS: Through a 14-question survey created on Survey Monkey, we asked the members of the Pediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) for their approach to ICD implantation. In particular, respondents were asked for their individual practice preferences on testing for acute defibrillation efficacy, including methods used for testing. RESULTS: There were 108 survey respondents. Thirty-nine percent test acute defibrillation efficacy at all implants, while 46% test in most patients, barring any clinical concerns. Another 14% routinely test during initial ICD system implants but not during generator changes with existing leads. Less than 1% of respondents do not routinely test acute defibrillation efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The practice preferences of pediatric electrophysiologists in evaluating for acute defibrillation efficacy during ICD implants are in contrast to the recent trend in their internal medicine-trained counterparts. More studies are needed to determine if practice changes should be considered in the pediatric and adult congenital patient population.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Falha de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise de Falha de Equipamento/métodos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Cardiol Young ; 26(6): 1176-82, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715655

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the American Heart Association modified the infective endocarditis prophylaxis guidelines by limiting the use of antibiotics in patients with cardiac conditions associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes after infective endocarditis. Our objective was to evaluate current practice for infective endocarditis prophylaxis among paediatric cardiologists. METHODS: A web-based survey focussing on current practice, describing the use of antibiotics for infective endocarditis prophylaxis in various congenital and acquired heart diseases, was distributed via e-mail to paediatric cardiologists. The survey was kept anonymous and was distributed twice. RESULTS: Data from 253 participants were analysed. Most paediatric cardiologists discontinued infective endocarditis prophylaxis in patients with simple lesions such as small ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, and bicuspid aortic valve without stenosis or regurgitation; however, significant disagreement persists in prescribing infective endocarditis prophylaxis in certain conditions such as rheumatic heart disease, Fontan palliation without fenestration, and the Ross procedure. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis in certain selected conditions for which infective endocarditis prophylaxis has been indicated as per the current guidelines varies from 44 to 83%. Only 44% follow the current guidelines exclusively, and 34% regularly discuss the importance of oral hygiene with their patients at risk for infective endocarditis. CONCLUSION: Significant heterogeneity still persists in recommending infective endocarditis prophylaxis for several cardiac lesions among paediatric cardiologists. More than half of the participants (56%) do not follow the current guidelines exclusively in their practice. Counselling for optimal oral health in patients at risk for infective endocarditis needs to be optimised in the current practice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Endocardite/prevenção & controle , Cardiopatias Congênitas/complicações , Adolescente , American Heart Association , Cardiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Correio Eletrônico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pediatria , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(20): 1990-1998, 2024 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the procedural characteristics, case volumes, and mortality rates for early- vs non-early-career interventional cardiologists in the United States. OBJECTIVES: This study examined operator-level data for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between April 2018 and June 2022. METHODS: Data were collected from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry, American Board of Internal Medicine certification database, and National Plan and Provider Enumeration System database. Early-career operators were within 5 years of the end of training. Annual case volume, expected mortality and bleeding risk, and observed/predicted mortality and bleeding outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,451 operators were early career; 1,011 changed their career status during the study; and 6,251 were non-early career. Overall, 514,540 patients were treated by early-career and 2,296,576 patients by non-early-career operators. The median annual case volume per operator was 59 (Q1-Q3: 31-97) for early-career and 57 (Q1-Q3: 28-100) for non-early-career operators. Early-career operators were more likely to treat patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and urgent indications for PCI (both P < 0.001). The median predicted mortality risk was 2.0% (Q1-Q3: 1.5%-2.7%) for early-career and 1.8% (Q1-Q3: 1.2%-2.4%) for non-early-career operators. The median predicted bleeding risk was 4.9% (Q1-Q3: 4.2%-5.7%) for early-career and 4.4% (Q1-Q3: 3.7%-5.3%) for non-early-career operators. After adjustment, an increased risk of mortality (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17; P < 0.0001) and bleeding (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.12; P < 0.0001) were associated with early-career status. CONCLUSIONS: Early-career operators are caring for patients with more acute presentations and higher predicted risk of mortality and bleeding compared with more experienced colleagues, with modestly worse outcomes. These data should inform institutional practices to support the development of early-career proceduralists.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Competência Clínica
20.
JACC Heart Fail ; 12(5): 878-889, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that the accuracy of heart failure (HF) cardiologists and family doctors to predict mortality in outpatients with HF proved suboptimal, performing less well than models. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate patient and physician factors associated with physician accuracy. METHODS: The authors included outpatients with HF from 11 HF clinics. Family doctors and HF cardiologists estimated patient 1-year mortality. They calculated predicted mortality using the Seattle HF Model and followed patients for 1 year to record mortality (or urgent heart transplant or ventricular assist device implant as mortality-equivalent events). Using multivariable logistic regression, the authors evaluated associations among physician experience and confidence in estimates, duration of patient-physician relationship, patient-physician sex concordance, patient race, and predicted risk, with concordant results between physician and model predictions. RESULTS: Among 1,643 patients, 1-year event rate was 10% (95% CI: 8%-12%). One-half of the estimates showed discrepant results between model and physician predictions, mainly owing to physician risk overestimation. Discrepancies were more frequent with increasing patient risk from 38% in low-risk to ∼75% in high-risk patients. When making predictions on male patients, female HF cardiologists were 26% more likely to have discrepant predictions (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.94). HF cardiologist estimates in Black patients were 33% more likely to be discrepant (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99). Low confidence in predictions was associated with discrepancy. Analyses restricted to high-confidence estimates showed inferior calibration to the model, with risk overestimation across risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepant physician and model predictions were more frequent in cases with perceived increased risk. Model predictions outperform physicians even when they are confident in their predictions. (Predicted Prognosis in Heart Failure [INTUITION]; NCT04009798).


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Volume Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Prognóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Relações Médico-Paciente , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Competência Clínica , Fatores Sexuais , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA