Paradoxical Embolic Stroke Following Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in a Hemodialysis Patient.

Paradoxical embolism is a medical condition characterized by the migration of an embolus from a venous source into the systemic circulation. This occurs through a specific cardiac abnormality known as a right-to-left shunt, ultimately resulting in the possibility of arterial embolism. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of intracardiac shunting. We reported a rare case of a 56-year-old man on hemodialysis with PFO and arteriovenous fistula dysfunction who suffered a paradoxical embolic ischemic stroke after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. This case emphasized the potential risk of paradoxical embolism in hemodialysis patients with vascular access problems. We aimed to highlight the importance of searching for PFO, as it may serve as a possible source of embolism in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in patients with a hypercoagulable disorder.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke reduces the rate of recurrent events. Although presence of thrombophilia increases the risk for paradoxical emboli through a PFO, such patients were excluded from large randomized trials. OBJECTIVES: We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure in patients with and without a hypercoagulable state. METHODS: Data from 800 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure in our medical center were analyzed. All patients were independently evaluated by specialists in neurology, cardiology, hematology, and vascular medicine. A post-procedural treatment of at least 3 months of anticoagulation was utilized in patients with thrombophilia. Follow-up events included death, recurrent neurological events, and the need for reintervention for significant residual shunt. RESULTS: A hypercoagulable state was found in 239 patients (29.9%). At median follow-up of 41.9 months, there were no differences in the frequencies of stroke or transient ischemic attack between patients with or without thrombophilia (2.5% in non-hypercoagulable group vs. 3.4% in hypercoagulable group, log-rank test p = 0.35). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, echocardiographic characteristics, procedural success, or complications between groups. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous PFO closure is a safe and effective therapeutic approach for patients with cryptogenic stroke and an underlying hypercoagulable state.

Large paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale following arteriovenous graft thrombectomy.

An 86-year-old man with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula in his left upper extremity presented to his hemodialysis session with thrombosis of his arteriovenous fistula. The patient underwent surgical thrombectomy. The patient later showed evidence of peripheral embolization and livedo reticularis. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms revealed a large thrombus (5 × 2 cm) in the right atrium prolapsing to the left atrium via a patent foramen ovale and another thrombus adherent to the apical wall of the right ventricle. The thrombus in the left atrium was intermittently crossing the mitral valve and entering the left ventricle.

Correlations between serum homocysteine levels and RoPE score in patients with patent foramen ovale.

The pathophysiological relationship between elevated serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has not yet been completely clarified. In the present study, we assess the correlation between serum homocysteine levels and the RoPE score in PFO patients. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and instrumental data of 244 subjects referred to a single tertiary center for PFO evaluation and/or treatment between January 2010 and January 2018,stratified as closure and control group, respectively. Patients in the closure group had an higher serum Hcy levels compared to the control group (28.5 ± 8.5 vs 10.2 ± 6.6 µg/dL, p < 0.0001). A significant direct correlation was observed between serum Hcy levels and the RoPE Score in the entire population. A positive significant correlation continued to exist also in the closure and control groups (r = 0.472, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.378, p < 0.0001, respectively). A receiver operating characteristics curve identified the optimal cutoff value of homocysteinemia as a predictor of RoPE score > 7 in the closure group (AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.94, p < 0.0001) when 19.5 µg/dL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an Hcy serum level ≥ 19.5 µg/dL predict an RoPE score > 7 (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.82-3.26, p < 0.0001) in closed patients independently from the presence of permanent right-to-left (RLS) (OR 2.28, 95% CI 2.01-2.43, p = 0.001) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) (OR 3.04, 95% CI 2.64-3.51, p < 0.0001). Serum homocysteine levels in PFO patients are positively correlated with the RoPE score. Moreover, a homocysteinemia ≥ 19.5 µg/dL predicts an RoPE score > 7 independently from the presence of a permanent RLS and a concomitant ASA.

Paradoxical embolism after surgery for breast cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical embolism (PDE) presented with concomitant pulmonary embolism (PE) and renal artery embolism (RAE) which occurred to breast cancer patient after breast-conserving therapy, has never been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old female with breast cancer exhibited unexplained hypoxemia, followed with vomiting, diarrhea, unilateral flank pain and abdominal pain after lumpectomy 12 h. The urgent multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) confirmed the diagnosis of PE and RAE. Confusingly, the patient had no history of intracardiac defect, cardiac valvular diseases, atrial fibrillation or other cardiovascular disease and the definite cause was still unclear. However, after 10 days of prompt anticoagulant therapy in ICU, she was discharged in good condition. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients after surgery suffering from unexplained hypoxemia, abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea should be highly suspicious of PE or RAE, even PDE. Any clinical presentation on these postoperative patients should be given much more attention to make accurate diagnosis and appropriate interventions.

Fusobacterial brain abscess caused by paradoxical embolization associated with Ebstein's anomaly in an adult patient: A case report.

Brain abscess remains a life-threatening condition. Here, we are reporting a case of brain abscess due to Fusobacterium nucleatum in a previously known case of Ebstein anomaly. A 44-year-old male presented with the complaints of headache, and fever. Cerebral imaging revealed parieto-occipital (PO) abscess. The abscess was drained and culture showed growth of Fusobacterium nucleatum. This report illustrates the importance of considering anaerobes as the cause of brain abscess, underscores the usefulness of MALDI, which facilitated the selection of appropriate and prompt adjuvant antibiotic therapy and a favourable outcome.

The Fragility Index in Randomized Controlled Trials for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The routine use of percutaneous transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure (PPFOC) to prevent recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke is still a matter of debate after completion major randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The fragility index of RCTs evaluating effect of PPFOC against medial therapy alone in stroke prevention was calculated to assess the robustness of statistically significant findings. RESULTS: Literature search with PubMed identifies 6 RCTs on PPFOC. Median number of patients who underwent PPFOC and medical treatment were 340 and 229, respectively. Median number of the patients lost to follow-up was 20 in PPFOC and 18 in medical group. Fragility index was 0 for 4 studies. Median fragility index was also 0 for both "stroke" (interquartile range: 0-5.3) and "combined stroke and TIA" (interquartile range: 0-2) endpoints. In all studies except CLOSE, fragility index was smaller than or equal to the number of the subjects lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Recent positive results of PFO closure studies should be interpreted cautiously because of their fragile characteristics. Routine PFO closure should be reserved for prevention of recurrence when suspicion for paradoxical embolism is high. Detailed individualized decision-making is crucial before ordering PPFOC for stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic embolism.

[Threatened paradoxical embolism, massive occlusion of pulmonary artery: risk stratification, treatment policy]. / Ugrozhaiushchaia paradoksal'naia émboliia, massivnaia okkliuziia legochnoi arterii: stratifikatsiia riska, taktika lecheniia.

Described in the article is a clinical case report regarding a male patient presenting with pulmonary thromboembolism, with a floating thrombus in the common femoral vein, in the right atrium, prolapsing into the right ventricle and propagating through a patent foramen ovale to the left atrium, thus being a threat of paradoxical embolism. The echocardiography findings demonstrated the following: mean pressure in the pulmonary artery amounting to 56 mm Hg, dilatation of the right atrium and right ventricle. The patient was subjected to simultaneous thrombectomy from the common femoral artery, from the right, left atria and pulmonary artery in conditions of cardioplegia, as well as ligation of the superficial femoral artery. The postoperative period proved uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 15, with pressure in the pulmonary artery amounting to 38 mm Hg. Besides, analysed herein are the contemporary literature data, clinical guidelines, and opinions of experts concerning treatment policy in this complex pathology.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) with atrial septal aneurysm is suggested as an important potential source for cryptogenic strokes. Percutaneous PFO closure to reduce the recurrence of stroke compared to medical therapy has been intensely debated. The aim of this study is to assess whether PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke is safe and effective compared with medical therapy. METHOD: A search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register from January 2000 through September 2017 for randomized controlled trails (RCT), which compared PFO closure to medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke was conducted. We used the items "PFO or patent foramen ovale", "paradoxical embolism", "PFO closure" and "stroke". Data were pooled for the primary outcome measure using the random-effects model as pooled rate ratio (RR). The primary outcome was reduction in recurrent strokes. RESULT: Among 282 studies, 5 were selected. Our analysis included 3,440 patients (mean age 45 years, 55% men, mean follow-up 2.9 years), 1,829 in the PFO closure group and 1,611 in the medical therapy group. The I2 heterogeneity test was found to be 48%. A random effects model combining the results of the included studies demonstrated a statistically significant risk reduction in risk of recurrent stroke in the PFO closure group when compared with medical therapy (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.91, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Pooled data from 5 large RCTs showed that PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke is safe and effective intervention for prevention of stroke recurrence compared with medical therapy.

[Inter-arm blood pressure difference does not always mean dissection]. / Une anisotension ne signifie pas toujours dissection.

A man presents an atypical neurological disorder. The diagnosis of aortic dissection is evoked with anisotension, but it consists in a paradoxical embolism in the presence of a permeable foramen oval since he presents with a proximal pulmonary embolus and a thrombus in the humeral artery.

Un homme se présente avec un trouble neurologique d'allure atypique. Le diagnostic de dissection aortique est évoqué devant une anisotension, mais il s'agit ici d'un tableau d'embolie paradoxale sur foramen ovale perméable puisqu'il présente une embolie pulmonaire proximale et un thrombus dans l'artère humérale.

Long-term follow-up after PFO device closure: Outcomes and Complications in a Single-center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To describe medium- to long-term follow-up of patients undergoing device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter device closure of PFO continues to be used for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke or TIA, but data are lacking regarding long-term outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic Rochester PFO database for patients who underwent device closure of PFO for secondary prevention of stroke/TIA from December 2001 to June 2012. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Recurrence rate of stroke/TIA were calculated. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors of recurrent neurologic events. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty patients (mean age 53 years; 40% female) were included in our study. Most patients (72%) had cryptogenic stroke as their qualifying event for PFO closure. There were no procedure-related deaths or strokes. The most commonly used device was the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (82%). Median follow-up was 6 years. A 3.9% of patients had documented residual right-to-left shunting at last echocardiogram. Recurrent stroke and/or TIA were reported in 45 patients, (6.3% of patients with follow-up data). Patients who experienced recurrent stroke/TIA were older and had a higher rate of diabetes and hypertension than those who did not. The presence of residual shunt did not correlate with risk of recurrent events. CONCLUSIONS: Device closure of PFO can be performed safely with very good long-term resolution of atrial shunting. Recurrent neurologic events after PFO closure may reflect additional comorbid risk factors unrelated to the potential for paradoxical embolism. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A patient with multiple paradoxical emboli.

We present a case report of simultaneous pulmonary emboli and paradoxical embolism to the cerebellum causing a stroke and severe ischemia to the left leg. This patient had risk factors for thromboembolic events that included autoimmune disease, cancer, and recent pelvic surgery. The presence of a perforate foramen ovale was suspected on his initial presentation and confirmed with echocardiography. For acute leg ischemia, this patient underwent emergent left common femoral embolectomy. The potential benefit of immediate anticoagulation had to be weighed against the risk of hemorrhagic transformation of his cerebellar stroke with possible compression of the fourth ventricle. In the end, full anticoagulation was delayed with interval placement of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. This case illustrates the challenges faced in treating a patient with multiple paradoxical emboli.

Case report of a central venous access device-associated thrombosis with aortic embolism in a preterm infant.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis in neonates is commonly a central venous access device (CVAD) associated complication. Furthermore, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently seen in preterm infants. Even though a coincidence of both is not unusual, detaching of the thrombus and organisation of an aortic embolism has not been described until now. Treatment recommendations of CVAD-associated thrombosis in neonates do not consider frequently seen complications of preterm infants e.g. intraventricular haemorrhage. This is the first case of a very preterm infant with pre-existing intraventricular haemorrhage, who developed a CVAD-associated thrombosis and thromboembolic complications. CASE PRESENTATION: The authors report on a very preterm girl with a pre-existing intraventricular haemorrhage and a CVAD-associated thrombus that, after removal of the CVAD, led to assumed pulmonary embolism and to an extended aortic embolism with consequent cerebral stroke. The girl was treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for about 50 days. During the further in-hospital stay the girl developed a mild bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Follow-up revealed clinical signs of cerebral palsy. CONCLUSION: Even though preterm infants are often diagnosed with a PFO which constitutes the risk for paradoxical embolism, such complications do not occur frequently due to the physiological heart pressure proportion. Nevertheless, it is important to monitor vital parameters and cerebral perfusion after removing a CVAD with confirmed associated thrombosis, because thromboembolic complications are possible. If practicable, patients with a confirmed CVAD-associated thrombosis should be anticoagulated before removing the CVAD. However, in our patient it was rational to remove the CVAD without prior anticoagulation due to the pre-existing intraventricular haemorrhage. There are various treatment recommendations for thrombosis or embolism in infants. However, there are no clear recommendations in very preterm infants with a high risk of cerebral bleeding respectively a pre-existing intraventricular haemorrhage. We decided to treat our patient with unfractionated heparin until the affected vessels were recanalised. Finally, it remains a case-by-case decision how to treat CVAD-associated thrombosis and consequent embolism depending on the patient's medical history.

Prevalence of Pelvic Vein Pathology in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale Undergoing MRV Pelvis.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of ischemic strokes has no any identified underlying cause. Notably, the prevalence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increased in cryptogenic stroke (CS) populations, which may serve as a conduit for paradoxical emboli originating from deep vein thrombosis (DVT) including the pelvic veins. Yet, there are no published guidelines for the assessment of pelvic veins as part of the stroke workup and few studies have systematically investigated pelvic veins as a potential source for paradoxical emboli in CS patients. Further, there is a relative paucity of data regarding pelvic DVT in CS and results have been conflicting. Hence, we sought to determine the prevalence of pelvic DVT in select CS patients with PFO who underwent magnetic resonance venography (MRV). METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients (n = 50) who underwent contrast-enhanced pelvic MRV at the discretion of the treating physician for the evaluation of CS in the presence of a PFO during hospitalization at a single academic stroke center between January 2011 through December 2013. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess for factors independently associated with the presence of an abnormal MRV pelvis. RESULTS: Patients (47 ± 13 years of age) had MRV performed 4 ± 3 days after their incident stroke. Nine patients had an abnormal MRV (18%). Of these, four (8%) had pelvic vein thrombosis and 5 (10%) a May-Thurner anatomic variant. All patients with pelvic DVT were subsequently anticoagulated with warfarin (none had abnormal hypercoagulability testing). Clinical clues suggesting paradoxical embolism were present in as many as 40% of patients. On multivariable logistic regression, a history of any risk factors predisposing to DVT (OR 6.7; coefficient 1.9; BCa 95% CI 0.08-20.2; p = 0.014) as well as the number of predisposing risk factors (OR 3.9; coefficient 1.4; BCa 95% CI 0.25-4.2; p = 0.005) predicted the presence of pelvic vein pathology on MRV. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a relatively high prevalence of pelvic DVT among select CS patients emphasizing the importance of considering the pelvic veins as a potential source for emboli particularly in the presence of risk factors known to predispose DVT. Because patients were included at the treating physician's discretion, our results reflect 'real-life' practice. Our results may be of clinical importance as inclusion of pelvic vein imaging in CS patients with PFO had impactful therapeutic and nosologic implications. Further study is needed to define patients most likely to benefit from pelvic vein imaging.

Paradoxical embolism causing acute embolic events in a patient with hereditary thrombophilia.

Paradoxical embolism (PDE) is an uncommon but clinically important entity. In clinical practice, PDE involving multiple organs is a rarely reported occurrence. Herein, we present a case of acute pulmonary embolism complicated by PDE through an atrial septal defect (ASD) causing a series of embolic events. Subsequent laboratory screening confirmed the patient to be a heterozygous carrier of the factor V Leiden mutation that increases the risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The patient was treated with warfarin indefinitely and underwent transcatheter ASD closure and implantation of an inferior vena cava filter.

Thrombus in Transit with Isolated Paradoxical Embolism to the Subclavian Artery.

Paradoxical embolism is an uncertain entity triggering significant debate. A thrombus in transit across a patent foramen ovale is a rarity, a potential catastrophe with nonuniform management recommendations, and theoretically the objective proof that paradoxical embolism is real. We present a case in a postoperative setting, with a thrombus in transit across a patent foramen ovale. Pulmonary embolization was clinically silent and diagnosed incidentally, and systemic embolization was isolated but extensive to the subclavian artery. The case stimulates many unanswered questions and possible scenarios.

Paradoxical thromboembolic stroke during extraction of a recalled St Jude Medical Riata defibrillator lead with conductor externalization.

Recalled St Jude Medical Riata leads have a high rate of insulation failures with potential thrombogenic externalized conductors. We report a paradoxical thromboembolic stroke through a persistent foramen ovale during extraction of a lead with externalization. We suggest mandatory transesophageal echocardiography prior to extraction to screen for lead-related thrombosis and routes of right-to-left shunting to reduce risk of thromboembolic complications.

Paradoxical embolism: role of imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Paradoxical embolism (PDE) is an uncommon cause of acute arterial occlusion that may have catastrophic sequelae. The possibility of its presence should be considered in all patients with an arterial embolus in the absence of a cardiac or proximal arterial source. Despite advancements in radiologic imaging technology, the use of various complementary modalities is usually necessary to exclude other possibilities from the differential diagnosis and achieve an accurate imaging-based diagnosis of PDE. In current practice, the imaging workup of a patient with symptoms of PDE usually starts with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to identify the cause of the symptoms and any thromboembolic complications in target organs (eg, stroke, peripheral arterial occlusion, or visceral organ ischemia). Additional imaging studies with modalities such as peripheral venous Doppler ultrasonography (US), transcranial Doppler US, echocardiography, and CT or MR imaging are required to detect peripheral and central sources of embolism, identify cardiac and/or extracardiac shunts, and determine whether arterial disease is present. To guide radiologists in selecting the optimal modalities for use in various diagnostic settings, the article provides detailed information about the imaging of PDE, with numerous radiologic and pathologic images illustrating the wide variety of features that may accompany and contribute to the pathologic process. The roles of CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis and exclusion of PDE are described, and the use of imaging for planning surgical treatment and interventional procedures is discussed.