RESUMO
Few diseases globally require treatment from so many different disciplines as diabetes-related foot disease. At least 25 different professionals may be involved: casting technicians, dermatologists, diabetes (educator) nurses, diabetologists, dieticians, endocrinologists, general practitioners, human movement scientists, infectious diseases experts, microbiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, orthotists, pedorthists, physical therapists, plastic surgeons, podiatric surgeons, podiatrists, prosthetists, psychologists, radiologists, social workers, tissue viability physicians, vascular surgeons, and wound care nurses. A shared vocabulary and shared treatment goals and recommendations are then essential. The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has produced guidelines and supporting documents to stimulate and support shared and multidisciplinary evidence-based treatment in diabetes-related foot disease. In this special virtual issue of Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, all 21 documents of the 2023 update of the IWGDF Guidelines are bundled, added with a further 6 reviews from multidisciplinary experts to drive future research and clinical innovations, based on their contributions to the International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot. We hope the readers will enjoy this special virtual issue, and widely implement the knowledge shared here in their daily clinical practice and research endeavours with the goal to improve the care for people with diabetes-related foot disease.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Doenças do Pé , Médicos , Humanos , Pé Diabético/etiologia , Pé Diabético/terapia , Endocrinologistas , Diabetes Mellitus/terapiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the unmet needs within the endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) care paradigm from the endocrinologist's perspective, including data abstracted from patient charts. The study evaluated endocrinologists' perceptions on burden of illness and treatment rationale along with the long-term clinical burden of CS, tolerability of CS treatments, and healthcare resource utilization for CS. METHODS: Retrospective medical chart data from treated patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CS was abstracted using a cross-sectional survey to collect data from qualified endocrinologists. The survey included a case report form to capture patient medical chart data and a web-enabled questionnaire to capture practitioner-level data pertaining to endocrinologists' perceptions of disease burden, CS treatments, and treatment attributes. RESULTS: Sixty-nine endocrinologists abstracted data from 273 unique medical charts of patients with CS. Mean patient age was 46.5 ± 13.4 years, with a 60:40 (female:male) gender split. The mean duration of endogenous CS amongst patients was 4.1 years. Chart data indicated that patients experienced a high burden of comorbidities and symptoms, including fatigue, weight gain, and muscle weakness despite multi-modal treatment. When evaluating treatments for CS, endocrinologists rated improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as the most important treatment attribute (mean score = 7.8; on a scale of 1 = Not at all important to 9 = Extremely important). Surgical intervention was the modality endocrinologists were most satisfied with, but they agreed that there was a significant unmet treatment need for patients with CS. CONCLUSION: Endocrinologists recognized that patients with CS suffered from a debilitating condition with a high symptomatic and HRQoL burden and reported that improvement in HRQoL was the key treatment attribute influencing their treatment choices. This study highlights unmet needs for patients with CS. Patients with CS have a high rate of morbidity and comorbidity, even after treatment.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Cushing , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome de Cushing/terapia , Síndrome de Cushing/diagnóstico , Endocrinologistas , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos TransversaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to examine the current evidence on the potential role of Mediterranean diet (MD) in the prevention and management of endocrine disorders and to highlight the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between endocrinologists and nutritionists. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies published in English. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the role of MD in the prevention and management of endocrine disorders. The search terms included "Mediterranean diet," "endocrine disorders," "thyroid disorders," "gonadal disorders," and "neuroendocrine tumors". RESULTS: The studies reviewed suggest that MD may have a beneficial effect in the prevention and management of various endocrine disorders, including thyroid disorders, gonadal disorders, and neuroendocrine tumors. MD has been associated with decreased risk of nodular thyroid disease and thyroid cancer, improved male and female reproductive health, and a potential role in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. MD's anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, as well as its high levels of phytochemicals, may play a role in its beneficial effects. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary collaboration between endocrinologists and nutritionists is essential for the optimal management of endocrine disorders, including the potential role of MD in their prevention and management. While further research is needed, the current evidence suggests that MD may have a protective effect against endocrine disorders, and its incorporation into dietary recommendations may be beneficial.
Assuntos
Dieta Mediterrânea , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Nutricionistas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Endocrinologistas , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/prevenção & controleRESUMO
We investigated the impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the management of endocrine and metabolic disorders in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional nationwide questionnaire survey targeting board-certified endocrinologists under the auspices of the Japan Endocrine Society. The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice questions and open-ended responses. Out of approximately 2,700 specialists, 528 (19.5%) opted to participate, suggesting a high level of interest in COVID-19 management among endocrinologists. The study found that almost half of participants had encountered cases of endocrine and metabolic disorders following COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Conditions related to thyroid diseases, glucose metabolism disorders/diabetes, and hypothalamic-pituitary disorders were particularly prevalent. Diabetes and obesity were identified as having high rates of severe cases or fatalities due to COVID-19. The study also highlighted challenges in routine diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing the potential benefits of combining remote consultations with in-person visits to optimize the frequency of examinations and check-ups during infectious disease outbreak which disrupts access to healthcare providers. The insights obtained from this survey are expected to contribute to ensuring appropriate healthcare provision for patients with endocrine and metabolic disorders by using flexible consultation formats, particularly even in the conditions where medical access may be limited due to future outbreaks of emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino , Doenças Metabólicas , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Doenças Metabólicas/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , Endocrinologistas , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Endocrinologia/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
This study examines providers' perceptions of provider-patient communication in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) practices. Grounded in narrative medicine, we interviewed six REI providers about their experiences providing fertility care. REI providers crafted a narrative of bearing witness by (1) situating personal and professional self in REI narratives, (2) sharing news as important medical moments, and (3) cultivating affiliation between provider and patient. These findings offer insight into the power of narrative medicine in fertility care, the role of emplotment in narrative sense-making, and the emotional labor associated with information delivery in REI treatments. We offer several recommendations for how patients and providers can improve communication experiences in REI.
Assuntos
Infertilidade , Medicina Narrativa , Humanos , Endocrinologistas , Pesar , Narração , Infertilidade/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Management of hypothyroidism is controversial because of medication cost pressures and scientific uncertainty on how to address treatment dissatisfaction experienced by some patients. The objective was to investigate the experience and preferences of UK endocrinologists in use of thyroid hormones. DESIGN: Web-based survey. PATIENTS: UK endocrinologists were invited to participate. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 21% (272/1295). While levothyroxine monotherapy is regarded as the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism, 51% of respondents stated that combined treatment with levothyroxine and liothyronine could be considered for levothyroxine-treated patients whose symptoms persist despite normalisation of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration. However, only 40% are currently prescribing such treatment, and just 23% would consider taking it themselves. A small minority prescribe desiccated thyroid extract, and those most likely to do so are aged over 60 years. Most respondents stated that they have no influence over brand or formulation of levothyroxine dispensed to their patients and expect no major differences in efficacy between different formulations. A total of 9% would prescribe levothyroxine for euthyroid enlarging goitre, and 29% for euthyroid female infertility with high titre thyroid peroxidase antibodies, despite recent trials finding no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: UK endocrine practice in management of hypothyroidism is broadly in line with international guidance. However, a minority of respondents would consider thyroid hormone supplementation in euthyroid individuals for female infertility, enlarging goitre, and other indications in which evidence of efficacy is lacking. Willingness to consider prescribing combined levothyroxine and liothyronine, for hypothyroid symptoms which persist despite normalised TSH, has increased in comparison to previous international surveys, despite inconsistent evidence of benefit.
Assuntos
Bócio , Hipotireoidismo , Infertilidade Feminina , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tiroxina , Tri-Iodotironina/uso terapêutico , Endocrinologistas , Hipotireoidismo/induzido quimicamente , Hormônios Tireóideos/uso terapêutico , Tireotropina , Inquéritos e Questionários , Bócio/induzido quimicamente , Bócio/tratamento farmacológico , Reino UnidoRESUMO
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the utilization of direct-to-consumer fertility tests (DTCFT) among fertility patients? How does the perceived utility of DTCFT differ between patients and reproductive endocrinologists (REI)? DESIGN: Infertility patients visiting the Duke Fertility Center between December 2020 and December 2021 were sent an electronic invitation to participate in a patient survey. Members of the Society of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility were also sent e-mail invitations to participate in the REI survey. DTCFT were defined as tests not ordered by a physician or performed at a physician's office, including calendar methods of ovulation prediction, urinary ovulation prediction kits, basal body temperature (BBT) monitoring, hormone analysis, ovarian reserve testing and semen analysis. Patients and REI were asked how likely they were to recommend a given DTCFT, on a 0-10 Likert scale. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients (response rate 50.5%) and 178 REI (response rate 21.4%) completed the surveys. Patients reported the utilization of calendar methods of ovulation prediction (83.8%), urinary ovulation prediction (78.8%), BBT monitoring (30.8%), hormone analysis (15.3%), semen analysis (10.1%) and ovarian reserve testing (9.2%). REI rated the utility of all DTCFT significantly lower than patients did (average discordance -4.2, P < 0.001), except for urinary ovulation prediction, which REI gave a significantly higher score (discordance +1.0, P < 0.001). Prior pregnancy was significantly associated with home ovulation prediction utilization among patients (adjusted odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.83). CONCLUSIONS: Methods of ovulation prediction are commonly used by fertility patients. Significant discordance exists in the perceived utility of DTCFT between patients and REI. Patient education and guidelines are needed to better inform individuals considering DTCFT.
Assuntos
Endocrinologistas , Infertilidade , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Fertilidade , HormôniosRESUMO
There is significant disagreement about how to support trans-identified or gender-dysphoric young people. Different experts and expert bodies make strikingly different recommendations based upon the same (limited) evidence. The US-originating "gender-affirmative" model emphasizes social transition and medical intervention, while some other countries, in response to evidence reviews of medical intervention outcomes, have adopted psychological interventions as the first line of treatment. A proposed model of gender-affirming care, comprising only medical intervention for "eligible" youth, is described in Rosenthal (2021). Determining eligibility for these medical interventions is challenging and engenders considerable disagreement among experts, neither of which is mentioned. The review also claims without support that medical interventions have been shown to clearly benefit mental health, and leaves out significant risks and less invasive alternatives. The unreliability of outcome studies and the corresponding uncertainties as to how gender dysphoria develops and responds to treatment are also unreported.
Assuntos
Pessoas Transgênero , Transexualidade , Humanos , Adolescente , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Endocrinologistas , Identidade de Gênero , Transexualidade/terapia , Saúde MentalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Endocrinology is well-suited to telehealth, with high rates of use and known benefits. Clinician attitudes toward telehealth will be critical to ensuring sustained use after the pandemic. We examined endocrinologists' experiences with synchronous telehealth to identify factors affecting experiences with and acceptance of the technology. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews and directed-content analysis with a purposive sample of 26 U.S. endocrinologists. Factors affecting clinicians' experiences were mapped to the human-organization-technology fit (HOT-fit) framework. RESULTS: We found that clinicians' experiences with synchronous telehealth were influenced by: (1) Clinician factors: Clinicians welcomed telehealth but expressed concerns about patient interest, rapport building, and clinical appropriateness, desiring more data to support its use. Many clinicians feared missing clinical findings on virtual examination, despite no such personal experiences. Effects on professional and personal life contributed to satisfaction, through increased flexibility but also increased workload. (2) Organizational factors: Departmental meetings and trainings supported clinicians' technical, logistical, and clinical needs, reducing resistance to telehealth use. Shifting staff responsibilities in clinical workflows improved clinicians' experiences and supported telehealth use, while mixed telehealth and in-person schedules impeded workflow. (3) Technology factors: Most clinicians preferred video visits to telephone. Usability and reliability of telehealth platforms, integration of patient self-monitoring data, and availability of IT support were crucial to a positive experience. CONCLUSION: Clinician acceptance of telehealth is influenced by clinician, organizational, and technology factors that can be leveraged to improve buy-in. Organizational leaders' attention to addressing these factors will be critical to support endocrinologists' continued provision of telehealth for their patients.
Assuntos
Endocrinologistas , Telemedicina , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Endocrinology referrals frequently lack important clinical information, which may increase the risk of inefficiency and adverse outcomes. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the completeness of new referrals by utilizing structured referral templates for common endocrine conditions at a large Veterans Health Administration medical center. Our target was of at least a 30% improvement in referral completeness for each condition after the intervention. METHODS: Electronic structured referral templates were designed utilizing existing resources and input from primary care providers and endocrinologists. Essential elements were identified and included in the templates. We conducted a retrospective chart review to compare referrals for 125 patients referred between January 1, 2021 and September 1, 2021 (preintervention) and 125 patients referred between October 1, 2021 and September 30, 2022 (postintervention). Each referral was rated using a scoring system derived from the criteria in the data abstraction tool formulated by the investigators. RESULTS: On average, preintervention referrals included 52% of the essential elements and postintervention referrals included 93%. Improvements in referral scores for each condition all met the prespecified 30% improvement target. The greatest improvement was for the element "type of visit preference." A separate analysis excluding that element showed an average improvement from 64% of essential elements preintervention to 92% postintervention. CONCLUSION: Structured referral templates, designed with the input of primary care providers and endocrinologists and embedded into an electronic referral system, can improve the availability of essential information and increase the quality of referrals. Future work should examine the effect of structured referral templates on efficiency, specialist experience, patient experience of care, and clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Endócrino , Endocrinologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/terapia , EndocrinologistasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care Version 7 recommended that before initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), patients should seek a psychosocial evaluation from a mental health professional documenting a diagnosis of persistent gender dysphoria. The Endocrine Society published guidelines in 2017 recommending against an obligatory psychosocial evaluation, which was affirmed in the recently published World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care Version 8 from 2022. Little is known about how endocrinologists ensure appropriate psychosocial assessment for their patients. This study assessed the protocols and characteristics of U.S.-based adult endocrinology clinics that prescribe GAHT. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey sent to members of a professional organization and the "Endocrinologists" Facebook group was responded by 91 practicing board-certified adult endocrinologists who prescribe GAHT. RESULTS: Thirty-one states were represented by the respondents. Overall, 83.1% of GAHT-prescribing endocrinologists reported accepting Medicaid. They reported working in university practices (28.4%), community practices (22.7%), private practices (27.3%), and other practice settings (21.6%). Overall, 42.9% of the respondents reported that their practice required documentation of a psychosocial evaluation from a mental health professional before initiating GAHT. CONCLUSION: Endocrinologists who prescribe GAHT are divided about requiring a baseline psychosocial evaluation before prescribing GAHT. Further work is needed to understand the impact of psychosocial assessment on patient care and facilitate the uptake of new guidelines into clinical practice.
Assuntos
Disforia de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Endocrinologistas , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Identidade de Gênero , Disforia de Gênero/tratamento farmacológico , HormôniosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of glycemic uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2 patients receiving treatment from endocrinologists with those treated by primary care physicians. Additionally, this research aims to identify patient profiles that would benefit from personalized referral-a novel medical approach that aims to match the most suitable specialist for effectively managing patient while considering the patient's profile. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study uses the Maccabi Healthcare Services diabetes registry to match 508 pairs of glycemic uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2 patients treated by endocrinologists (EndoG) and primary care physicians (PcPG). Using a generalized additive model, we analyzed the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) trend over 1 year for each group. We employed the odds ratio (OR) from conditional logistic regression to determine the likelihood of favorable outcomes in the EndoG compared to the PcPG, using the entire cohort and subcohort profiles. RESULTS: The generalized additive model comparison indicated an improvement in HbA1c levels in both groups, with the EndoG outperforming the PcPG. Furthermore, the EndoG group had an OR = 2.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 3.2) for reducing HbA1c by at least 1% within a year and an OR = 1.68 (95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.76) for achieving low-density lipoprotein levels< 100 mg/dl. We identified 96 profiles with positive outcomes, all favoring treatment by endocrinologists. CONCLUSIONS: EndoG demonstrated superior HbA1c control over time and achieved better outcomes compared to PcPG. The identification of 96 profiles benefiting from endocrinologist referral emphasizes the potential of personalized referral.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Endocrinologistas , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , GlicemiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify the types of osteoporosis-related questions being asked by primary care providers (PCPs) and describe the impact of the advice provided by osteoporosis specialists using eConsult. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of osteoporosis-related eConsults submitted to endocrinologists between January 2018 and December 2020 on the Champlain eConsult BASE™ Service in Ontario, Canada. Each eConsult was coded according to clinical question and answer type through consensus between 2 authors, based on predetermined taxonomies. We analyzed eConsult utilization data, including response times, PCP satisfaction, and referral outcomes (collected via PCP surveys). RESULTS: Of the 2,528 eConsults sent to endocrinologists during the study period, 408 (16%) were specific to osteoporosis. The most common questions asked by PCPs were regarding whether or not to start treatment (35%), the initial therapy choice (25%), and how often to complete bone mineral density scans (15%). The most common responses from specialists included recommendations for bone mineral density scanning (34%), recommendation to start therapy (24%), and recommendation to treat using a bisphosphonate without the dose specified (23%). The median response interval was 3.1 days. Most cases (84%) were resolved without requiring an in-person referral. Clear advice for a new course of action for PCPs to implement was provided in 54% of cases. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis eConsults provide timely access to valuable specialist advice while avoiding unnecessary face-to-face clinic visits. We identified commonly recurring osteoporosis questions asked by PCPs, which can be used to inform planning of future continuing professional development events.
Assuntos
Osteoporose , Consulta Remota , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Endocrinologistas , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This consensus statement provides (1) visual guidance in concise graphic algorithms to assist with clinical decision-making of health care professionals in the management of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus to improve patient care and (2) a summary of details to support the visual guidance found in each algorithm. METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) selected a task force of medical experts who updated the 2020 AACE Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm based on the 2022 AACE Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan and consensus of task force authors. RESULTS: This algorithm for management of persons with type 2 diabetes includes 11 distinct sections: (1) Principles for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes; (2) Complications-Centric Model for the Care of Persons with Overweight/Obesity; (3) Prediabetes Algorithm; (4) Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Algorithm: Dyslipidemia; (5) Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Algorithm: Hypertension; (6) Complications-Centric Algorithm for Glycemic Control; (7) Glucose-Centric Algorithm for Glycemic Control; (8) Algorithm for Adding/Intensifying Insulin; (9) Profiles of Antihyperglycemic Medications; (10) Profiles of Weight-Loss Medications (new); and (11) Vaccine Recommendations for Persons with Diabetes Mellitus (new), which summarizes recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning with the 2022 AACE diabetes guideline update, this 2023 diabetes algorithm update emphasizes lifestyle modification and treatment of overweight/obesity as key pillars in the management of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus and highlights the importance of appropriate management of atherosclerotic risk factors of dyslipidemia and hypertension. One notable new theme is an emphasis on a complication-centric approach, beyond glucose levels, to frame decisions regarding first-line pharmacologic choices for the treatment of persons with diabetes. The algorithm also includes access/cost of medications as factors related to health equity to consider in clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dislipidemias , Endocrinologia , Hipertensão , Estado Pré-Diabético , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Endocrinologistas , Sobrepeso , Estado Pré-Diabético/terapia , Obesidade/terapia , Glucose/uso terapêutico , Dislipidemias/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare clinical condition caused by excessive cortisol secretion from adrenal glands. CS is associated with increased mortality and morbidity; therefore, a prompt diagnosis and an effective therapeutic approach are strongly necessary to improve the patient's clinical management. The first-line treatment for CS is surgery, while medical treatment has historically played a minor role. However, thanks to the availability of novel compounds, the possibility of improving hypercortisolism control using different drug combinations emerged. PURPOSE: No absolute recommendations are available to guide the therapeutic choice for patients with CS and, consequently, the awareness of unmet needs in CS management is growing. Although new data from clinical trials are needed to better define the most appropriate management of CS, an expert consensus approach can help define unmet needs and optimize the current CS management and treatment. METHODS: Twenty-seven endocrinologists from 12 Italian regions, working among the main Italian referral centers for hospital endocrinology where they take care of CS patients, were involved in a consensus process and used the Delphi method to reach an agreement on 24 statements about managing CS patients. RESULTS: In total, 18 statements reached a consensus. Some relevant unmet needs in the management of CS were reported, mainly related to the lack of a pharmacological treatment successful for the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: While acknowledging the difficulty in achieving complete disease control, a significant change in CS management requires the availability of medical treatment with improved efficacy and safety over available therapeutic options at the time of the current study.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Cushing , Humanos , Síndrome de Cushing/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Cushing/diagnóstico , Endocrinologistas , Glândulas Suprarrenais , ItáliaRESUMO
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) with predicted fetal sex chromosomes included in the results has become increasingly available for pregnant individuals. Predicted fetal sex chromosome results from NIPS are interpreted so as to equate sex chromosomes with sex and gender. As pediatric endocrinologists, we worry about how this use of NIPS harmfully reinforces sex and gender binaries and sets potentially inaccurate assumptions about what the identified chromosomes mean. We use a hypothetical case based on our clinical experience in which the NIPS report of fetal sex does not conform to expectations at birth to highlight ethical concerns surrounding this practice. The use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction has the potential to perpetuate stigma and bring psychological harm to parents and their future children, particularly those who are intersex, transgender, and gender diverse. The medical community should adopt an approach to the use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction that recognizes the spectrums of sex and gender to avoid reproducing stigma towards sex- and gender-diverse individuals and associated harms.
Assuntos
Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Humanos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Aneuploidia , Endocrinologistas , Cuidado Pré-NatalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) may influence the clinical outcomes of patients with endocrine disorders. There are few studies describing perspectives towards SDM among endocrinologists in China. METHODS: In the first stage, we conducted a national survey using an online questionnaire about SDM among endocrinologists in China. The national survey focused on attitude and propensity, potential barriers, and the effectiveness of SDM implementation strategies. In the second stage, survey participants were further recruited to participate in a prospective cohort study in the online continuing medical education (CME) program of Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing. The Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc) was employed to assess the effects of online CME on physicians' perspectives during the process of SDM, which was conducted before and after the CME course was provided. RESULTS: In the national survey, 280 endocrinologists (75.7% female, mean age 38.0 ± 4.5 years, 62.5% with a duration of practice of more than ten years) completed the questionnaire. Participants had a generally positive attitude towards SDM in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers included time consumption, information inequality between doctors and patients, and a lack of technical support and training for SDM. The main uncertainties of implementation steps included inviting patients to participate in SDM (16.3%), assisting in decision-making (15.3%), facilitating deliberation and decision-making (13.7%), and providing information on benefits and risks (12.6%). Of the physicians who participated in the national survey, 84 registered for the eight-day online CME course. The SDM-Q-Doc score increased from 87.3 ± 18.2 at baseline to 93.0 ± 9.3 at the end of the 8-day online CME training (p = 0.003, paired t test). The participants' age, sex, education level, practice duration, the annual number of patients with rare endocrine diseases, and the annual number of patients requiring MDT or CME were not significantly related to increased SDM-Q-Doc scores after online CME (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chinese endocrinologists had a generally positive attitude towards SDM in clinical practice. There were also several uncertainties in the implementation steps of SDM. Regardless of a physician's educational background or prior professional experience, CME may help to improve their perspectives regarding SDM.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Endocrinologistas , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Educação Médica Continuada , Estudos Prospectivos , População do Leste Asiático , Participação do PacienteRESUMO
Wolfram syndrome 1 (WS1) is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease caused by mutations in WFS1 and WFS2 genes that produce wolframin, a protein involved in endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis and cellular apoptosis. Its main clinical features are diabetes insipidus (DI), early-onset non-autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DM), gradual loss of vision due to optic atrophy (OA) and deafness (D), hence the acronym DIDMOAD. Several other features from different systems have been reported such as urinary tract, neurological, and psychiatric abnormalities. In addition, endocrine disorders that can appear during childhood and adolescence include primary gonadal atrophy and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism in males and menstrual cycle abnormalities in females. Further, anterior pituitary dysfunction with deficient GH and/or ACTH production have been described. Despite the lack of specific treatment for the disease and its poor life expectancy, early diagnosis and supportive care is important for timely identifying and adequately managing its progressive symptoms. The current narrative review focuses on the pathophysiology and the clinical features of the disease, with a special emphasis on its endocrine abnormalities that appear during childhood and adolescence. Further, therapeutic interventions that have been proven to be effective in the management of WS1 endocrine complications are discussed.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Doenças Neurodegenerativas , Síndrome de Wolfram , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Síndrome de Wolfram/genética , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/complicações , Endocrinologistas , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Mutação , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , PediatrasRESUMO
It is well accepted by the medical literature that polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an extremely heterogeneous condition and that a multidisciplinary approach, involving gynecologists, endocrinologists, primary healthcare providers, mental health professionals, and nutritional professionals, especially dietitians, is fundamental to provide an immediate care and to counteract long-term risk factors related to the comorbidity of PCOS. Although lifestyle modifications are the first step intervention in the treatment of PCOS, unfortunately, the involvement of dietitian in clinical practice remains sporadic. The goal of this viewpoint is to put a greater emphasis on the role of dietitian in the management of PCOS by highlighting frequently faced difficulties in the clinical settings and the importance of a three-step nutritional care: accurate assessment; lifestyle, nutritional, and supplementary intervention; long-term follow-up. The intention is to raise awareness among dietitians themselves and other health providers as well as to express an exceeding necessity of evidence-based guidelines formulated specifically for nutritional professionals, which would allow a uniform approach with respect to heterogeneity and complexity of PCOS at the international level.
Assuntos
Nutricionistas , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Endocrinologistas , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Motivação , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Obesity has been globally recognized as a critically important disease by professional medical organizations, in addition to the World Health Organization and American Medical Association, but health care systems, medical teams, and the public have been slow to embrace this concept. METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology staff drafted a survey, and 2 endocrinologists independently reviewed the survey's questions and modified the survey instrument. The survey included questions related to practice and patient demographics, awareness about obesity, treatment of obesity, barriers to improving obesity outcomes, digital health, cognitive behavioral therapy, lifestyle medicine, antiobesity medications, weight stigma, and social determinants of health. The survey was emailed to 493 endocrinologists, with 305 (62%) completing the study. RESULTS: Of the responders, 98% agreed that obesity is a disease, whereas 2% neither agreed nor disagreed. Of the respondents, 53% were familiar with the term "adiposity-based chronic disease" and 13% were certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine. Of the respondents, 57% used published obesity guidelines as a resource for treating patients with obesity. Most endocrinologists recommended dietary and lifestyle changes, but fewer prescribed an antiobesity medication or recommended bariatric surgery. American Board of Obesity Medicine-certified endocrinologists were more likely to use a multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSION: Self-reported knowledge and practices in the management of obesity highlight the importance of a multimodal approach to obesity and foster collaboration among health care professionals. It is necessary to raise awareness about obesity among clinicians, identify knowledge gaps, and create educational tools to address those gaps.