Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 215
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 163(2): 289-293, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509298

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of lymph nodes and lymph node metastases (LNMs) in the upper paracervical lymphovascular tissue (UPLT) in early stage cervical cancer. METHODS: In this prospective study consecutive women with stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer underwent a pelvic lymphadenectomy including identification of sentinel nodes (SLNs) as part of a nodal staging procedure in conjunction with a robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) or robotic radical trachelectomy (RRT). Indocyanine green (ICG) was used as tracer. The UPLT was separately removed and defined as "SLN-parametrium" and, as all SLN tissue, subjected to ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry. Primary endpoint was prevalence of lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes in the UPLT. Secondary endpoints were complications associated with removal of the UPLT. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five women were analysed. Nineteen (13.1%) had pelvic LNMs, all identified by at least one metastatic SLN. In 76 women (52.4%) at least one UPLT lymph node was identified. Metastatic UPLT lymph nodes were identified in six women of which in three women (2.1% of all women and 15.8% of node positive women) without lateral pelvic LNMs. Thirteen women had lateral pelvic SLN LNMs with either no (n = 5) or benign (n = 8) UPLT lymph nodes. No intraoperative complications occurred due to the removal of the UPLT. CONCLUSION: Removal of the UPLT should be an integral part of the SLN concept in early stage cervical cancer.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/normas , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Corantes/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/normas , Verde de Indocianina/administração & dosagem , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pelve/cirurgia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/normas , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/normas , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(6): 589.e1-589.e13, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safety warnings about power morcellation in 2014 considerably changed hysterectomy practice, especially for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy that typically requires morcellation to remove the corpus uteri while preserving the cervix. Hospitals might vary in how they respond to safety warnings and altered hysterectomy procedures to avoid use of power morcellation. However, there has been little data on how hospitals differ in their practice changes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation and compare the risk of surgical complications at hospitals that had different response trajectories in use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and the State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from 14 other states. We identified women aged ≥18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the hospital inpatient and outpatient settings from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. We calculated a risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for each hospital in each calendar quarter after accounting for patient clinical risk factors. Applying a growth mixture modeling approach, we identified distinct groups of hospitals that exhibited different trajectories of using laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy over time. Within each trajectory group, we compared patients' risk of surgical complications in the prewarning (2013Q4-2014Q1), transition (2014Q2-2014Q4), and postwarning (2015Q1-2015Q3) period using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Among 212,146 women undergoing benign hysterectomy at 511 hospitals, the use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy decreased from 15.1% in 2013Q4 to 6.2% in 2015Q3. The use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy at these 511 hospitals exhibited 4 distinct trajectory patterns: persistent low use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy changed from 2.8% in 2013Q4 to 0.6% in 2015Q3), decreased medium use (17.0% to 6.9%), decreased high use (51.4% to 24.2%), and rapid abandonment (30.5% to 0.8%). In the meantime, use of open abdominal hysterectomy increased by 2.1, 4.1, 7.8, and 11.8 percentage points between the prewarning and postwarning periods in these 4 trajectory groups, respectively. Compared with the prewarning period, the risk of major complications in the postwarning period decreased among patients at "persistent low use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94). In contrast, the risk of major complications increased among patients at "rapid abandonment" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.98), and the risk of minor complications increased among patients at "decreased high use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72). CONCLUSION: Hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation. Complication risk increased at hospitals that shifted considerably toward open abdominal hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Morcelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/normas , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morcelação/efeitos adversos , Morcelação/métodos , Morcelação/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(13): 1634-1642, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of gestational age (GA) at the time of fetal open spinal dysraphism (OSD) repair through a mini-hysterotomy on the ability of children to walk. METHODS: Children who underwent in utero repair of OSD and had formal neurological assessment after 2.5 years of age were compared regarding their ability to walk in relation to pre-surgical predictors. RESULTS: Sixty-nine children fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 63.7% (44/69) were able to walk with or without orthesis. Fetal OSD correction performed earlier in gestation (from 19.7 to 26.9 weeks) was associated with a higher probability of walking with or without orthesis (p = 0.033). The median GA at delivery was 35.3 weeks. Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that the upper anatomical level of the OSD ( L5) (p < 0.004; OR: 10.31 [95% CI: 2.07-51.28]) and GA at the time of fetal surgery (p = 0.026; OR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.48-0.95]) were independent predictors of the postnatal ability to walk with or without orthesis. CONCLUSION: Fetuses with OSD who were operated on earlier in pregnancy (range: 19.7-26.9 weeks), were more likely to walk with or without orthesis.


Assuntos
Idade Gestacional , Histerectomia/normas , Disrafismo Espinal/cirurgia , Caminhada/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Terapias Fetais/métodos , Terapias Fetais/normas , Terapias Fetais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Disrafismo Espinal/complicações
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(2): 469-475, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32059864

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of an enhanced recovery after minimally invasive surgery (MIS-ERAS) protocol on opioid requirements and post-operative pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy on a gynecologic oncology service. METHODS: For this retrospective study, opioid use (oral morphine equivalents (OME)) and post-operative pain scores were compared between patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy pre and post MIS-ERAS protocol implementation. Patients with chronic opioid use or chronic pain were excluded. Opioid use and pain scores were compared between groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum, Student's t-test, and multiple linear regression. Compliance and factors associated with opioid use and pain scores were assessed. RESULTS: The MIS-ERAS cohort (n = 127) was compared to the historical cohort (n = 99) with no differences in patient demographic, clinical or surgical characteristics observed between groups. Median intra-operative and inpatient post-operative opioid use were lower among the MIS-ERAS cohort (12.0 vs 32.0 OME, p < .0001 and 20.0 vs 35.0 OME, p = .02, respectively). Pain scores among MIS-ERAS patients were also lower (mean 3.6 vs 4.1, p = .03). After controlling for age, BMI, operative time, length of stay, cancer diagnosis, and surgical approach, the MIS-ERAS cohort used 10.43 fewer OME intra-operatively (p < .001), 10.97 fewer OME post-operatively (p = .019) and reported pain scores 0.56 points lower than historical controls (p = .013). Compliance was ≥81% for multimodal analgesia elements and ≥75% overall. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive surgery protocol implementation is an effective means to reduce opioid use, both in the intra-operative and post-operative phases of care, among gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/normas , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(1): 248-255, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718728

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology published its first clinical guidelines for uterine cervical cancer in 2007 which has been revised twice in 2011 and 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the first guideline publication on the therapeutic trend and patient outcome by analyzing uterine cervical cancer cases registered to the cancer registry organized by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. METHODS: Data of uterine cervical cancer cases registered to the cancer registry from 2000 to 2012 were provided. Epidemiological and clinical trend were analyzed by the Chi-squared test with subsequent standardized residual analysis. Overall survival among the patients registered between 2004 and 2009 was analyzed using the Fine and Gray competing risk model. RESULTS: 68,707 cases were registered during the study period. A trend analysis revealed that the guideline publication may have led to a decrease in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in parallel with an increase in radiation therapy mainly in stage II and III patients undergoing primary treatment. A survival analysis indicated that the introduction of the guideline may have improved overall survival among stage III uterine cervical cancer patients, even though a significant difference was not observed in all of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential influence of the guideline publication on the clinical trend and patient outcome. As this is the first assessment of the guideline for uterine cervical cancer in Japan, continuous evaluation is necessary to further comprehend the significance of this guideline.


Assuntos
Ginecologia/tendências , Oncologia/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/normas , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia/normas , Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/tendências , Japão/epidemiologia , Oncologia/normas , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/normas , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/normas , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
6.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 32(2): 159-165, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895105

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of hysterectomy and hysteroscopic endometrial resection in improving quality of life (QoL), sexual function and psychological wellbeing of women abnormal uterine bleeding. RECENT FINDINGS: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase for original studies written in English (registered in PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019133632), using the terms 'endometrial ablation', 'endometrial destruction', 'endometrial resection', 'hysterectomy', 'menorrhagia', 'dysfunctional uterine bleeding', 'quality of life', 'sexuality' published up to April 2019. Our literature search produced 159 records. After exclusions, nine studies were included showing the following results: both types of treatment significantly improve QoL and psychological wellbeing; hysterectomy is associated with higher rates of satisfaction; hysterectomy is not associated with a significant deterioration in sexual function. SUMMARY: Hysterectomy is currently more advantageous in terms of improving abnormal uterine bleeding and satisfaction rates than hysteroscopic endometrial destruction techniques. Furthermore, there is some evidence of a greater improvement in general health for women undergoing hysterectomy. However, high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials should be implemented to investigate the effectiveness of hysterectomy and endometrial ablation in the improvement of QoL outcomes in larger patient cohorts.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Histeroscopia/normas , Metrorragia/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Metrorragia/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia
7.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1389-1394, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31655129

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency with which Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals met a metric of ≥80% minimally invasively performed hysterectomies for endometrial cancer and to compare the clinical outcomes of hospitals meeting this metric with those that did not. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospitals caring for ≥20 endometrial cancer patients per year recorded in the National Cancer Database in 2015 were included. PATIENTS: Women who had undergone hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and had an epithelial histology, a Charlson comorbidity score of 0, and stage I to III disease. INTERVENTION: Patient characteristics, patterns of care, and outcomes were compared between hospitals performing ≥80% minimally invasive hysterectomies and hospitals not meeting this metric. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The hospitals (n = 510) treated 20 670 women with endometrial cancer. In 283 (55%) hospitals ≥80% of hysterectomies were minimally invasively performed (high-minimally invasive surgery [MIS] hospitals, overall MIS rate 89%). In the 227 hospitals that did not meet this metric, 61% of hysterectomies for endometrial cancer were performed using a minimally invasive approach. In high-MIS hospitals, patients were more likely to be white (87% vs 82%, p<.001), privately insured (53% vs 49%, p <.001), and have stage I disease (84% vs 82%, p = .002) and an endometrioid histology (79% vs 76%, p <.001). Surgery was more often performed robotically (80% vs 71%), and conversion to laparotomy was less likely (1.5% vs 3.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.57) (both p <.001). Patients treated at high-MIS hospitals were more likely to have undergone lymph node assessment at the time of surgery (76% vs 69%; aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.53) and been discharged on the same or next day (74% vs 57%; aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.13-2.42) and were less likely to have an unplanned 30-day readmission (1.8% vs 2.9%; aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.77). CONCLUSION: An MIS rate of ≥80% for endometrial cancer is feasible on a national scale and is associated with other hospital-level measurements of high-quality care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Endometrioide/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirurgia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparotomia/métodos , Laparotomia/normas , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(4): 953-958, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404710

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP) based on 4 different routes of concurrent hysterectomy: vaginal (VH), laparoscopic-assisted (LAVH), laparoscopic supracervical (LSCH), and total laparoscopic (TLH). DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. A secondary analysis of the 2006-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was performed analyzing women who underwent concurrent hysterectomy with MISCP based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We excluded open abdominal hysterectomies. We compared outcomes between VH, LAVH, LSCH, and TLH including operative time, length of hospital stay, a composite outcome of 30-day postoperative adverse events, readmission, or reoperation. A logistic regression model was used to correct for pre-identified potential confounding variables. A minimum detectable effect analysis was planned. SETTING: Hospitals participating in the NSQIP program. PATIENTS: Women who underwent hysterectomy with MISCP. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 524 women underwent hysterectomy with MISCP including VH in 31 (5.9%), LAVH in 40 (7.6%), LSCH in 322 (61.5%), and TLH in 131 (25%). The VH group had a higher incidence of ≥4 concurrent CPT codes (71% vs 27% in other groups, p = .03). Operative times differed significantly between groups (p < .01): TLH had the shortest operating time (171.43 ± 83.77 minutes). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, rate of reoperation, 30-day readmission, or the composite outcome (p = .8). Route of hysterectomy was not associated with increased composite outcome on adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-3.99, p = .88). A minimum detectable effect analysis indicated that this study population had 80% power to detect an OR of 5.07 or greater between the different routes of hysterectomy during concomitant MISCP for the composite 30-day outcome. CONCLUSION: Regardless of route of concurrent hysterectomy, MISCP is associated with low rates of 30-day complications, reoperation, and readmission.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Colposcopia/efeitos adversos , Colposcopia/métodos , Colposcopia/normas , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Período Perioperatório , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(6): 1344-1353.e3, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740432

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To monitor and report nationwide changes in the rates of and complications after different methods for benign hysterectomy, operative hysteroscopy, myomectomy, and embolization in Denmark. To report the national mortality after benign hysterectomy DESIGN: National prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: The Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database. PATIENTS: Women undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic diseases: 64 818 hysterectomies, 84 175 hysteroscopies, 4016 myomectomies, and 1209 embolizations in Denmark between 2004 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: National meetings with representatives from all departments, annual working reports of institutional complication rates, workshops, and national guideline initiative to improve minimally invasive surgical methods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rates of the different methods and complications after each method with follow-up to 5 years as recorded by the database directly in the National Patient Registry. Nationwide, a decline in the use of hysterectomy, myomectomy, embolizations, and endometrial ablation. The total short-term complications were 9.8%, 7.5%, 8.9%, and 2.7% respectively, however, with a persistent risk of approximately 20% for recurrent operations within 5 years after endometrial ablation. Initially, we urged for increased use of vaginal hysterectomy, but only reached 36%. From 2010, we urged for reducing abdominal hysterectomies by implementing laparoscopic hysterectomy and reached 72% laparoscopic and robotic procedures. Since 2015, we used coring or contained morcellation for removal of large uterus at laparoscopic hysterectomy. The major and minor complication rates (modified Clavien-Dindo classification) were reduced significantly from 8.1% to 4.1% and 9.9% to 5.7% respectively. Mortality after benign hysterectomy was 0.27‰. The odds ratio for major complications after abdominal hysterectomy was 1.66 (1.52-1.81) compared to minimally invasive hysterectomy independent of the length of stay, high-volume departments, indications, comorbidity, age, and calendar year. CONCLUSION: Fifteen years with a national database has resulted in a marked quality improvement. Denmark has 85% minimally invasive hysterectomies and has reduced the number of major complications by 50%.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/normas , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Ciência da Implementação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/normas , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Morcelação/efeitos adversos , Morcelação/métodos , Morcelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(3): 242-245, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30419200

RESUMO

Value-based care, best clinical outcome relative to cost, is a priority in correcting the high costs for average clinical outcomes of health care delivery in the United States. Hysterectomy represents the most common and identifiable nonobstetric major surgical procedure among women. Surgical approaches to hysterectomy in the United States have changed in recent decades. For benign indications, clinical evidence identifies the superiority of vaginal hysterectomy over all other routes. These conclusions rest on clinical outcomes; however, cost differentials also exist across hysterectomy approaches, with the vaginal approach consistently incurring the lowest overall costs. Taken together, vaginal hysterectomy has the highest value, whereas the robotic (given high costs) and abdominal approaches (given less favorable clinical outcomes) have less value. Traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy holds an intermediate value. Increasing the use of high-value hysterectomy approaches can be achieved by adopting multimodal strategies, with changes in the payment models being the most important.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Histerectomia/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Estados Unidos
11.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(1): 86-90, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659132

RESUMO

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was previously considered an acceptable alternative to open radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC), but adequately powered, high-quality prospective trials evaluating survival outcomes were lacking. Recently, a large randomized phase III trial, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, showed that MIS for ESCC is associated with a higher risk of recurrence and death compared with open surgery. We review the LACC trial findings in depth, as well as a recent National Cancer Database analysis using propensity score weighting that supports the LACC trial findings. Additional studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms explaining the worse survival associated with MIS for ESCC. This review discusses considerations for integrating the findings of the LACC trial into clinical practice. Based on the high-quality evidence now available, open radical hysterectomy should be offered as standard of care for stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer and patients should be guided appropriately to make informed shared decision-making if they still desire MIS.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/normas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
12.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(1): 64-84, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659131

RESUMO

Cervical cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the uterine cervix. Most cases of cervical cancer are preventable through human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, routine screening, and treatment of precancerous lesions. However, due to inadequate screening protocols in many regions of the world, cervical cancer remains the fourth-most common cancer in women globally. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of cervical cancer. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the workup, staging, and treatment of early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer, as well as evidence for these recommendations. For recommendations regarding treatment of recurrent or metastatic disease, please see the full guidelines on NCCN.org.


Assuntos
Oncologia/normas , Infecções por Papillomavirus/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Útero/patologia , Colo do Útero/virologia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/normas , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Preservação da Fertilidade/normas , Humanos , Histerectomia/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Oncologia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/normas , Teste de Papanicolaou/normas , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia
13.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(2): 321-326, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503760

RESUMO

In healthcare, the goal of maximizing value by improving the quality of care and lowering costs has been notoriously challenging to achieve. The fee-for-service model in gynecology and other fields has historically promoted the reduction of nonsurgical or minimally invasive approaches in favor of complex, often morbid procedures. In this review, we seek to define quality and value in the healthcare field and describe strategies that promote quality over production. We then discuss national, non-specialty-based efforts in the context of Surgical Care Improvement Project measures to improve quality of care. Finally, we present a case study through the Kaiser Permanente Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Initiative, one such model that successfully built on the quality metrics of the foregoing strategies to improve patient care.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Histerectomia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/normas , Liderança , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/normas
14.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 41(4): 543-557, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assist physicians performing gynaecologic surgery in decision making surrounding hysterectomy for benign indications. INTENDED USERS: Physicians, including gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, general surgeons, emergency medicine specialists; nurses, including registered nurses and nurse practitioners; medical trainees, including medical students, residents, and fellows; and all other health care providers. TARGET POPULATION: Adult women (18 years and older) who will undergo hysterectomy for benign gynaecologic indications. OPTIONS: The approach to hysterectomy and utility of concurrent surgical procedures are reviewed in this guideline. EVIDENCE: For this guideline relevant studies were searched in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. The following MeSH search terms and their variations for the last 5 years (2012-2017) were used: vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy, robotic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, standard vaginal hysterectomy, and total vaginal hysterectomy. VALIDATION METHODS: The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors and members of the Gynaecology Committee. The Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Tables 1 and 2). The Summary of Findings is available upon request. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Hysterectomy is common, yet surgical practice still varies widely among gynaecologic physicians. This guideline outlines preoperative and perioperative considerations to improve the quality of care for women undergoing benign gynaecologic surgery. GUIDELINE UPDATE: This Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada clinical practice guideline will be automatically reviewed 5 years after publication. However, authors can propose another review date if they feel that 5 years is too short/long based on their expert knowledge of the subject matter. SPONSORS: This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Canadá , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
15.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 41(8): 1168-1176, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30686606

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: As quality-based procedures (QBPs) are being established across the province of Ontario, it is important to identify reliable quality indicators (QIs) to ensure that compensation coincides with quality. Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynaecologic procedure and as such is a care process for which a QBP is being developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technicity index (TI) as a QI for hysterectomy by defining it in the context of specific surgical outcomes and complications. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysterectomy from April 2003 to October 2014 in the province of Ontario. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear models were created to assess the effect of a minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) approach on the primary outcome measure: all hysterectomy-associated complications (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS: Of the procedures meeting the study's inclusion criteria, 56.8% were performed using an abdominal hysterectomy approach, whereas 43.2% were performed using an MIH approach. Over the study period, TI improved significantly from 33.23% in 2003 to 58.47% in 2014. During this time span, the overall incidence of all hysterectomy-associated complications was 13.1%. CONCLUSION: The composite risk of all hysterectomy-associated complications was reduced by 46% with an MIH approach. The uptake of MIH improved significantly in Ontario from 2003 to 2014 and is adequately assessed by the TI. The TI is an appropriate QI for hysterectomy that can be used to track patients' outcomes and direct hysterectomy funding.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia Vaginal/normas , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/normas , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 45(4): 882-891, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30672089

RESUMO

AIM: This retrospective study sought to identify the selection criteria required for a non-radical hysterectomy with minimal parametrectomy in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: Overall, 461 patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer who underwent a radical hysterectomy were reviewed clinicopathologically according to pathological tumor size (≤2 cm, >2 - ≤4 cm, and > 4 cm). RESULTS: The pathological parametrial involvement rate in the less than equal to 2 cm group (2%) was significantly lower than in greater than 2-less than equal to 4 cm (13%) or greater than 4 cm (29%) groups (both P < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the less than equal to 2 cm group (97%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 94-99%) compared with greater than 2-less than equal to 4 cm (90%, 95% CI 94-86%) and greater than 4 cm (70%, 95% CI 79-60%) groups (both P < 0.001). Cox model analysis identified tumor size to be an independent prognostic factor for survival (95% CI 1.33-5.78) and recurrence (95% CI 1.31-5.66) compared to other pathological factors. However, a significant difference between the three groups was not found in rates of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events following radical hysterectomy (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with FIGO stage IB invasive cervical cancer. This retrospective study suggests that FIGO stage IB patients with a less than equal to 2 cm tumor size are optimal candidates for non-radical hysterectomy with minimal parametrectomy, and without resulting bladder dysfunction.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
17.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 41(8): 859-867, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31062091

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the procedure of laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy to avoid ureter injury. METHODS: Data were obtained from: (1) anatomic study of ten fresh female cadavers to measure the distance between the point where the ureter and uterine artery cross and the level of section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery during extrafascial dissection of the uterine pedicle and uterosacral ligament (Paris School of Surgery). The Wilcoxon test was used to compare measurements within each subject. P < 0.05 was considered to denote significance; (2) prospectively collected clinical data from women undergoing laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy from July 2006 to March 2014 at Poissy University Hospital, to describe the laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy technique with analysis of surgical complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Anatomic study: The mean (SD) distance between the point where the ureter and uterine artery cross and the level of the section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery were: 11.6 mm (5.2) in neutral position and 25 mm (7.5) after pulling the uterus laterally; and 25mm (8.9) after sectioning the ascending portion of the uterine pedicle and 38.6 mm (4.5) after complete uterine artery pedicle dissection through the uterosacral ligaments. After release of the ureter, the curve in front of the uterine artery disappeared. Clinical laparoscopic study: Sixty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy. No ureteral complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. Combined lateralization and elevation of the uterus, section of the ascending branch of the uterine artery, and its extrafascial dissection along the uterosacral ligament contribute to protecting the ureter during the procedure.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Laparoscopia/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ureter/anatomia & histologia , Doenças Ureterais/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/lesões , Doenças Ureterais/etiologia , Artéria Uterina/anatomia & histologia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Útero/irrigação sanguínea , Útero/cirurgia
19.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(7): e567-e579, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29921436

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the indications for hysterectomy, preoperative assessment, and available alternatives required prior to hysterectomy. Patient self-reported outcomes of hysterectomy have revealed high levels of patient satisfaction. These may be maximized by careful preoperative assessment and discussion of other treatment choices. In most cases hysterectomy is performed to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. The patient's preference regarding treatment alternatives must be considered carefully. OPTIONS: The areas of clinical practice considered in formulating this guideline are preoperative assessment including alternative treatments, choice of method for hysterectomy, and evaluation of risks and benefits. The risk-to-benefit ratio must be examined individually by the woman and her health practitioners. OUTCOMES: Optimizing the decision-making process of women and their caregivers in proceeding with a hysterectomy having considered the disease process, and available alternative treatments and options, and having reviewed the risks and anticipated benefits. EVIDENCE: Using Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database, English language articles were reviewed from 1996 to 2001 as well as the review published in the 1996 SOGC guidelines. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Hysterectomy is the treatment of choice for certain gynaecologic conditions. The predicted advantages must be carefully weighed against the possible risks of the surgery and other treatment alternatives. In the properly selected patient, the result from the surgery should be an improvement in the quality of life. The cost of the surgery to the health care system and to the patient must be interpreted in the context of the cost of untreated conditions. The approach selected for the hysterectomy will impact on the cost of the surgery. RECOMMENDATIONS: Benign Disease Preinvasive Disease Invasive Disease Acute Conditions Other Indications Surgical Approach VALIDATION: Medline searches were performed in preparing this guideline with input from experts in their field across Canada. The guideline was reviewed and accepted by SOGC Council and Executive. SPONSOR: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Canadá , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Obstetrícia , Sociedades Médicas
20.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 44(9): 1800-1807, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051538

RESUMO

AIM: We modified the antimicrobial prophylaxis of surgical site infection (SSI) according to the guidelines of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and Japan Society of Infectious Diseases (hereinafter referred to as optimization) and measured outcomes. METHODS: From April 2016 to March 2017, we performed cesarean section and open hysterectomy with optimization, and compared the outcome to that of surgery performed without optimization between April 2014 and March 2016. We measured the rates of antibiotic discontinuation, appropriate antibiotic selection, SSI incidence, resumption of antibiotic therapy and fever incidence, as well as the length of postoperative hospital stay and medical expenses for antibiotics to evaluate the appropriateness and outcomes of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Optimization resulted in a change in the method of selecting antibiotics for cesarean section, but there was no change in SSI incidence rate (0.74% vs 0.0%, P = 0.36). Optimization reduced the use of antibiotics and medical expenses of hysterectomy (median reduction of 50% and 78% for hysterectomy without or with lymphadenectomy, respectively). However, there was no change in outcome regarding SSI incidence (5.7% vs 0.0%, P = 0.11 and 7.8% vs 9.5%, P = 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of antibiotics according to guidelines reduced antibiotic dose and medical expenses, but there was no change in outcome regarding SSI incidence rate. These findings suggested that implementation of dosing regimens according to the guidelines would be useful to reduce antibiotic medicine costs and prevent resistant bacteria and complications associated with antibiotics.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Cesárea/normas , Histerectomia/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Cesárea/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Japão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA