RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and every 5 years following open surgical repairs (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Adherence to these guidelines is low outside of clinical trials, and compliance at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is not yet well-established. We examined imaging follow-up compliance and mortality rates after AAA repair at VA hospitals. METHODS: We queried the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective infrarenal AAA repairs, EVAR and OSR, then merged in follow-up imaging and mortality information. Mortality rate over time was derived using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Generalized estimating equation with a logit link and a sandwich standard error estimate was performed to compare the probability of having annual follow-up imaging over time between procedure types and to identify variables associated with follow-up imaging for EVAR patients. RESULTS: Our analysis included 11,668 patients who underwent EVAR and 4507 patients who underwent OSR at VA hospitals between the years 2000 and 2019. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR and OSR was 0.37% and 0.82%, respectively. OSR was associated with lower long-term mortality after adjusting age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and preoperative renal failure with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92; P < .01). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 69.1% by 1 year post-EVAR. The follow-up rate after 5 years was 45.6% post-EVAR compared with 63.6% post-OSR of surviving patients. A history of smoking or drinking, baseline hypertension, and known cardiac disease were independently associated with poor follow-up after EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing elective open AAA repair in the VA hospital system had lower long-term mortality compared with patients who underwent endovascular repair. Compliance with post-EVAR imaging is low. Patient factors associated with poor post-EVAR imaging surveillance were smoking within the last year, excess alcohol consumption, and cardiac risk factors including hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Bases de Dados Factuais , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine Black-White patient differences in mortality and other hospital outcomes among Veterans treated in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA hospitals. BACKGROUND: Lower hospital mortality has been documented in older Black patients relative to White patients, yet the mechanisms have not been determined. Comparing other hospital outcomes and multiple hospital systems may help inform the reasons for these differences. METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of hospitalization records was conducted for Veterans discharged in VA and non-VA hospitals from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017 in 11 states. Hospital outcomes included 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, inpatient costs, and length of stay. Hospitalizations were for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, gastrointestinal bleeding, heart failure, pneumonia, and stroke. Differences in outcomes were estimated between Black and White patients for VA and non-VA hospitals and age groups younger than 65 years or 65 years and older in regression models adjusting for patient and hospital factors. RESULTS: There were a total of 459,574 study patients. Older Black patients had lower adjusted mortality for acute myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, heart failure, and pneumonia. Adjusted probability of readmission was higher and adjusted mean length of stay and costs were greater for older Black patients relative to White patients in non-VA hospitals for several conditions. Fewer differences were observed in younger patients and in VA hospitals. CONCLUSION: While older Black patients had lower mortality, other outcomes compared poorly with White patients. Differences were not fully explained by observable patient and hospital factors although social determinants may contribute to these differences.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Infarto do Miocárdio , Pneumonia , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Transversais , Brancos , Hospitais , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Hospitais de Veteranos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Veteran satisfaction of care within the Veterans Affairs is typically very high. Yet recommendation ratings of VA medical center (VA) hospitals as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems are generally lower than non-VA hospitals.Therefore, it was our objective to assess Veteran satisfaction and recommendation scores and then examine whether satisfaction correlates to recommendation. METHODS: We identified all acute care VAs as our primary analytic cohort. As a comparator group, we also included all acute care academic hospitals (non-VAs), as designated by the Centers for Medicare Services. Using data from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model, we collated patient satisfaction scores, as well as markers of surgical safety from Hospital Compare. We then analyzed the correlation within VAs and non-VAs, primarily focusing the relationship between the "would you recommend Hospital Rating" and subdomains of the "Overall Hospital Rating," as well as a composite score of patient safety. RESULTS: A total of 133 VAs and 1116 non-VAs were identified. Among VAs, the "Would you Recommend" hospital rating was significantly and positively correlated with markers of patient satisfaction including care transitions (Pearson's r = 0.59, P = 0.03), Nursing communication (Pearson's R 0.79, P = 0.001), and percent of primary care provider wait times less than 30 min (Pearson's r = 0.25, P = 0.01). VA-recommended scores were negatively correlated with factors such as time to emergency department discharge, and the "leaving the emergency department before being evaluated." When looking at non-VAs, correlation directions were similar, albeit with stronger associations at almost every metric. While recommended scores correlated strongly to overall hospital ratings for both groups, VAs had no significant correlation between "would you recommend" and patient safety. However, there was a slight negative correlation between patient safety and "recommend" among non-VAs. CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfiers and dissatisfiers of care appear similar between VAs and non-VAs, "would you recommend" is a far weaker marker of patient perceptions of safety and quality. These seemingly empathetic markers such as "would you recommend" should be used with caution as they may not address the fundamental question being asked.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Satisfação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To improve access, the VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 mandated a 2-year study of medical scribes in Veterans Health Administration specialty clinics and emergency departments. Medical scribes are employed in clinical settings with the goals of increasing provider productivity and satisfaction by minimizing physicians' documentation burden. Our objective is to quantify the economic outcomes of the MISSION Act scribes trial. METHODS: A cluster-randomized trial was designed with 12 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers randomized into the intervention. We estimated the total cost of the trial, cost per scribe-year, and projected cost of hiring additional physicians to achieve the observed scribe productivity benefits in relative value units and visits per full-time-equivalent over the 2-year intervention period (June 30, 2020 to July 1, 2022). RESULTS: The estimated cost of the trial was $4.6 million, below the Congressional Budget Office estimate of $5 million. A full-time scribe-year cost approximately $74 600 through contracting and $62 900 through VA hiring. Randomization into the trial led to an approximate 30% increase in productivity in cardiology and 20% in orthopedics. The projected incremental cost of using additional physicians instead of scribes to achieve the same productivity benefits was nearly $1.7 million more, or 75% higher, than the observed cost of scribes in cardiology and orthopedics. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest randomized trial of scribes to date, the MISSION Act scribes trial provides important evidence on the costs and benefits of scribes. Improving productivity enhances access and scribes may give VA a new tool to improve productivity in specialty care at a lower cost than hiring additional providers.
Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Documentação/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eficiência , Hospitais de Veteranos/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration provides care to more than 100,000 Veterans with cirrhosis. AIMS: This implementation evaluation aimed to understand organizational resources and barriers associated with cirrhosis care. METHODS: Clinicians across 145 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (VAMCs) were surveyed in 2022 about implementing guideline-concordant cirrhosis care. VA Corporate Data Warehouse data were used to assess VAMC performance on two national cirrhosis quality measures: HCC surveillance and esophageal variceal surveillance or treatment (EVST). Organizational factors associated with higher performance were identified using linear regression models. RESULTS: Responding VAMCs (n = 124, 86%) ranged in resource availability, perceived barriers, and care processes. In multivariable models, factors independently associated with HCC surveillance included on-site interventional radiology and identifying patients overdue for surveillance using a national cirrhosis population management tool ("dashboard"). EVST was significantly associated with dashboard use and on-site gastroenterology services. For larger VAMCs, the average HCC surveillance rate was similar between VAMCs using vs. not using the dashboard (47% vs. 41%), while for smaller and less resourced VAMCs, dashboard use resulted in a 13% rate difference (46% vs. 33%). Likewise, higher EVST rates were more strongly associated with dashboard use in smaller (55% vs. 50%) compared to larger (57% vs. 55%) VAMCs. CONCLUSIONS: Resources, barriers, and care processes varied across diverse VAMCs. Smaller VAMCs without specialty care achieved HCC and EVST surveillance rates nearly as high as more complex and resourced VAMCs if they used a population management tool to identify the patients due for cirrhosis care.
Assuntos
Cirrose Hepática , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/epidemiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Masculino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , FemininoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: For the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to continue to perform complex cardiothoracic surgery, there must be an established pathway for providing urgent/emergent extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Partnership with a nearby tertiary care center with such expertise may be the most resource-efficient way to provide ECLS services to patients in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure. The goal of this project was to assess the efficiency, safety, and outcomes of surgical patients who required transfer for perioperative ECLS from a single stand-alone Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) to a separate ECLS center. METHODS: Cohort consisted of all cardiothoracic surgery patients who experienced cardiogenic shock or refractory respiratory failure at the local VAMC requiring urgent or emergent institution of ECLS between 2019 and 2022. The primary outcomes are the safety and timeliness of transport. RESULTS: Mean time from the initial shock call to arrival at the ECLS center was 2.8 h. There were no complications during transfer. Six patients (86%) survived to decannulation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that complex cardiothoracic surgery can be performed within the VHA system and when there is an indication for ECLS, those services can be safely and effectively provided at an affiliated, properly equipped center.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Hospitais de Veteranos , Choque Cardiogênico , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Estados Unidos , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transferência de PacientesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that documentation of comorbidities differed when Veterans received care within versus outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Changes to medical center funding, increased attention to performance reporting, and expansion of Clinical Documentation Improvement programs, however, may have caused coding in VHA to change. METHODS: Using repeated cross-sectional data, we compared Elixhauser-van Walraven scores and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) severity levels for Veterans' admissions across settings and payers over time, utilizing a linkage of VHA and all-payer discharge data for 2012-2017 in seven US states. To minimize selection bias, we analyzed records for Veterans admitted to both VHA and non-VHA hospitals in the same year. Using generalized linear models, we adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Following adjustment, VHA admissions consistently had the lowest predicted mean comorbidity scores (4.44 (95% CI 4.34-4.55)) and lowest probability of using the most severe DRG (22.1% (95% CI 21.4%-22.8%)). In contrast, Medicare-covered admissions had the highest predicted mean comorbidity score (5.71 (95% CI 5.56-5.85)) and highest probability of using the top DRG (35.3% (95% CI 34.2%-36.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies may be needed to improve VHA documentation, and current risk-adjusted comparisons should account for differences in coding intensity.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Hospitais de Veteranos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Team-based care is critical to achieving health care value while maximizing patient outcomes. Few descriptions exist of graduate-level team training interventions and practice models. Experience from the multisite, decade-long Veterans Affairs (VA) Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education provides lessons for developing internal medicine training experiences in interprofessional clinical learning environments. METHODS: A review of multisite demonstration project transforming traditional silo-model training to interprofessional team-based primary care. Using iterative quality improvement approaches, sites evaluated curricula with learner, faculty and staff feedback. Learner- and patient-level outcomes and organizational culture change were examined using mixed methods, within and across sites. Participants included more than 1600 internal medicine, nurse practitioner, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, social work and physical therapy trainees. This took place in seven academic university-affiliated VA primary care clinics with patient centered medical home design RESULTS: Each site developed innovative design and curricula using common competencies of shared decision making, sustained relationships, performance improvement and interprofessional collaboration. Educational strategies included integrated didactics, workplace collaboration and reflection. Sites shared implementation best practices and outcomes. Cross-site evaluations of the impacts of these educational strategies indicated improvements in trainee clinical knowledge, team-based approaches to care and interest in primary care careers. Improved patient outcomes were seen in the quality of chronic disease management, reduction in polypharmacy, and reduced emergency department and hospitalizations. Evaluations of the culture of training environments demonstrated incorporation and persistence of interprofessional learning and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning education and practice goals with cross-site collaboration created a robust interprofessional learning environment. Improved trainee/staff satisfaction and better patient care metrics supports use of this model to transform ambulatory care training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This evaluation was categorized as an operation improvement activity by the Office of Academic Affairs based on Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05, in which information generated is used for business operations and quality improvement (Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations Part 16 (38 CFR 16.102(l)). The overall project was subject to administrative oversight rather Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, as such informed consent was waived as part of the project implementation and evaluation.
Assuntos
Currículo , Cultura Organizacional , Atenção Primária à Saúde , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Estados Unidos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inovação Organizacional , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Medicina Interna/educaçãoRESUMO
As the population grows, the incidence of dementia will increase. A common occurrence in people with dementia is behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). BPSD can include apathy, aggression, resistance to care, and agitation. BPSD can start or worsen during an acute hospitalization, but these units are not well-equipped to handle BPSD, often relying on pharmacological interventions to address distress behaviors. One known behavioral intervention for BPSD is STAR-VA, an interdisciplinary approach to managing these behaviors. However, this intervention has not been utilized in acute care. Our team implemented STAR-VA in acute care at a Veterans Affairs hospital in the northeastern United States. Using the VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) implementation roadmap to guide our work, we first outlined the problem, completed a needs assessment with staff, and began implementation. Results from this quality improvement project demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of STAR-VA in an acute care setting.
Assuntos
Demência , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Demência/complicações , Demência/psicologia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Sintomas Comportamentais/terapia , Hospitais de Veteranos , IdosoRESUMO
Importance: Advancing equitable patient-centered care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) requires understanding the differential experiences of unique patient groups. Objective: To inform a comprehensive strategy for improving VHA health equity through the comparative qualitative analysis of care experiences at the VHA among veterans of Black and White race and male and female sex. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used a technique termed freelisting, an anthropologic technique eliciting responses in list form, at an urban academic VHA medical center from August 2, 2021, to February 9, 2022. Participants included veterans with chronic hypertension. The length of individual lists, item order in those lists, and item frequency across lists were used to calculate a salience score for each item, allowing comparison of salient words and topics within and across different groups. Participants were asked about current perceptions of VHA care, challenges in the past year, virtual care, suggestions for change, and experiences of racism. Data were analyzed from February 10 through September 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Smith salience index, which measures the frequency and rank of each word or phrase, was calculated for each group. Results: Responses from 49 veterans (12 Black men, 12 Black women, 12 White men, and 13 White women) were compared by race (24 Black and 25 White) and sex (24 men and 25 women). The mean (SD) age was 64.5 (9.2) years. Some positive items were salient across race and sex, including "good medical care" and telehealth as a "comfortable/great option," as were some negative items, including "long waits/delays in getting care," "transportation/traffic challenges," and "anxiety/stress/fear." Reporting "no impact" of racism on experiences of VHA health care was salient across race and sex; however, reports of race-related unprofessional treatment and active avoidance of race-related conflict differed by race (present among Black and not White participants). Experiences of interpersonal interactions also diverged. "Impersonal/cursory" telehealth experiences and the need for "more personal/attentive" care were salient among women and Black participants, but not men or White participants, who associated VHA care with courtesy and respect. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative freelist study of veteran experiences, divergent experiences of interpersonal care by race and sex provided insights for improving equitable, patient-centered VHA care. Future research and interventions could focus on identifying differences across broader categories both within and beyond race and sex and bolstering efforts to improve respect and personalized care to diverse veteran populations.
Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde , Veteranos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , População Negra , Saúde dos Veteranos , População Urbana , Fatores Raciais , Fatores Sexuais , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares , Hospitais de Veteranos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Brancos , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Inappropriate patient sexual behaviors (IPSBs) can negatively impact work performance, job satisfaction, and the psychological well-being of clinicians and staff. Although the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the rate of IPSBs in VHA hospitals is unknown. The unique demographic and cultural characteristics of military populations may be associated with IPSBs. To evaluate the extent and impact of IPSBs within a large VA healthcare system (VAHS), a survey was disseminated to all staff. Among the 32% of staff who responded (N = 1359), over half (n = 789; 58.1%) of participants reported at least one instance of IPSB during the past year; this included 67.9% (n = 644) of staff who identified as women and 33.4% (n = 126) of staff who identified as men. There was a significantly greater impact of IPSBs for women, as compared to men, on psychological well-being (X2 1 = 60.4, p < .001, odds ratio [OR] = 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.08, 6.79]), work satisfaction (X2 1 = 43.0, p < .001, OR = 3.51, 95% CI: [2.40, 5.18]), and workplace practices (X2 1 = 48.9, p < .001, OR = 4.02, 95% CI: [2.69, 6.11]). The results of this project highlight the need for overcoming barriers to reducing the pervasiveness and impact of these experiences.
Assuntos
Comportamento Sexual , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação no Emprego , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Background Orienting medical trainees to new practice environments is essential. Huddles have been shown to improve communication and safety outcomes. However, their use in orienting trainees to systems processes and changes on inpatient general medicine (GM) wards remains unexplored. Objective Implement a weekly inpatient huddle between residents and hospital leaders to improve dissemination of information around health system operations. Methods In 2019, we established "Resident Huddle," a weekly 20-minute huddle for senior internal medicine residents rotating on GM wards at a US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital led by the site leads. Resident Huddle content included system updates, rotation updates, process reminders, performance feedback, and systems and patient safety concerns raised by trainees. Reactions to the huddle were assessed via survey. Behavioral change was assessed by rates of complete trainee admission medication reconciliation documentation before and after huddle implementation. Results Resident Huddle started in October 2019 and continues to this day. Between October 2019 and June 2022, 136 of 205 participants completed surveys (66% response rate). Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the huddle provided useful information for care delivery (94%, 128 of 136), improved work engagement (73%, 99 of 136), provided feedback on practice patterns (90%, 121 of 135), and that issues they experienced were acknowledged and acted upon (86%, 114 of 133). Retrospective medical record analysis demonstrated improvement in admission medication reconciliation completion rate by trainees from pre-intervention (32%, 19 of 60) to post-intervention (73%, 44 of 60). Conclusions A weekly huddle between hospital leaders and residents strengthened communication and equipped trainees with operational health systems knowledge to enhance patient care outcomes while fostering a greater sense of engagement with their work environment.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Hospitais de Veteranos , Medicina Interna , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educação , Estados Unidos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
PURPOSE: The New England VA Hernia Registry was created in 2011 to prospectively collect relevant details of ventral hernia repairs, with the intention to assess and improve long term outcomes. The goal of this study is to assess registry compliance. METHODS: All ventral hernia operations performed in five VA hospitals between 2011-2022 were obtained. We assessed compliance at the hospital and surgeon level. RESULTS: 3,516 cases were performed. Overall compliance with registry entry was 37.5%, ranging from 10.8% to 67.2% across hospitals. At the hospital level, there was a negative correlation between average yearly hernia volume per surgeon and registry compliance (r2 = 0.53). Surgeon compliance varied within hospitals and over time. CONCLUSION: Registry compliance was low and highly variable. Lack of interest, incentives, oversight, and surgeon turnover are possible factors for noncompliance. Building a registry with these factors in mind, providing timely feedback, and conducting frequent audits may improve compliance.
Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Estados Unidos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , New EnglandRESUMO
Hospitals within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system exhibited growing use of observation care. It is unknown how this affected VA hospital performance since observation care is not included in acute inpatient measures. To examine changes in VA hospitalization outcomes and whether it was affected by shifting acute inpatient care to observation care. Longitudinal analysis of 986,355 acute hospitalizations and observation stays in 11 states 2011 to 2017. We estimated temporal changes in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, costs, and length of stay (LOS) for all hospitalizations and 6 conditions in adjusted models. Changes in mortality and readmissions were compared including and excluding observation care. A 9% drop in acute hospitalizations was offset by a 157% increase in observation stays 2011 to 2017. A 30-day mortality decreased but readmissions did not when observation stays were included (all Pâ <â .05). Mean costs increased modestly; mean LOS was unchanged. There were differences by condition. VA hospital mortality decreased; there was no change in readmissions.
Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Hospitais de Veteranos , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Estudos Longitudinais , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: This quality improvement project demonstrates that nursing leadership with Project Re-Engineered Discharge can effect change in the discharge process and improve patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Alta do Paciente/normas , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/métodos , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/normas , Gestão de Mudança , Estados Unidos , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Background: Palliative PLUS (PP) at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System (MVAHCS) is an interdisciplinary team that seeks to improve veteran access to palliative and hospice resources. Palliative care pharmacists were incorporated to increase patient access to palliative specialties. Objective: To identify and categorize pharmacist interventions within an outpatient PP team at the MVAHCS. Methods: This quality improvement project was a retrospective analysis of the electronic health record. Results: A total of 84 patients were participating in the PP program over 13 months. Among those patients, 25 had pharmacist involvement and a total of 56 interventions were identified. Of those interventions, 29 (51.8%) were direct interventions and 27 (48.2%) were curbside consults. Most interventions involved medication counseling and medication adherence. Conclusion: Pharmacists made an impact on the PP team through direct patient interventions involving medication counseling and aided the interdisciplinary team by facilitating patient medication adherence.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Cuidados Paliativos , Farmacêuticos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Idoso , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , VeteranosRESUMO
CONTEXT: Clinical practice guidelines recommend palliative care for people with advanced heart failure (aHF), yet it remains underutilized. OBJECTIVES: We examined medical center variation in specialist palliative care (SPC) and identified factors associated with variation among people with aHF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 21,654 people with aHF who received healthcare in 83 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) from 2018-2020. We defined aHF with ICD-9/10 codes and hospitalizations. We used random intercept multilevel logistic regression to derive SPC reach (i.e., predicted probability) for each VAMC adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. We then examined VAMC-level SPC delivery characteristics associated with predicted SPC reach including the availability of outpatient SPC (proportion of outpatient consultations), cardiology involvement (number of outpatient cardiology-initiated referrals), and earlier SPC (days from aHF identification to consultation). RESULTS: Of the sample the mean age = 72.9+/-10.9 years, 97.9% were male, 61.6% were White, and 32.2% were Black. The predicted SPC reach varied substantially across VAMCs from 9% to 57% (mean: 28% [95% Confidence Interval: 25%-30%]). Only the availability of outpatient SPC was independently associated with higher SPC reach. VAMCs, in which outpatient delivery made up the greatest share of SPC consultations (9% or higher) had 11% higher rates of SPC reach relative to VAMCs with a lower proportion of outpatient SPC. CONCLUSION: SPC reach varies widely across VAMCs for people with aHF. Outpatient palliative is common among high-reach VAMCs but its role in reach warrants further investigation. Strategies used by high-reach VAMCs may be potential targets to test for implementation and dissemination.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Cuidados Paliativos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Veteranos , Hospitalização , Hospitais de Veteranos , EspecializaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Thousands of health systems have been recognized as "Age-Friendly" for implementing geriatric care practices aligned with the "4Ms" (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility). However, the effect of Age-Friendly recognition on patient outcomes is largely unknown. We sought to identify this effect in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-one of the largest Age-Friendly integrated health systems in the United States. METHODS: There were 50 VA medical centers (VAMCs) recognized as Age-Friendly by December 2021. We used a time-event difference-in-difference analysis to identify the association of a VAMC's recognition as Age-Friendly on the change in facility-free days (days outside the hospital or nursing home) among Veterans treated at that facility. We also evaluated this association in three subgroups: Veterans at particularly high risk of nursing home entry, Veterans who lived within 10 miles of a medical center, and facilities that had reached Level 2 Age-Friendly recognition. We also evaluated individual components of the endpoint in terms of change in hospital and nursing home days separately. RESULTS: We found Age-Friendly recognition was associated with small statistically significant improvements in facility-free days (0.2% on a base of 97% facility-free days on average per year, or an additional 0.73 days per year on a base of 354 days). There were no differences in any subgroup, or any individual component of the endpoint across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: At the individual level, an increase of 0.2% in facility-free days is a weak effect. However, sites were early in implementation, and facility-free days may not be a responsive outcome measure. However, across an entire population, small changes in facility-free days may accrue large cost savings. Future evaluations should consider a broader variety of process and outcome measures.
Assuntos
Casas de Saúde , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Idoso , Masculino , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To understand the determinants and benefits of cross-sector partnerships between Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and geographically affiliated AmericaServes Network coordination centers that address Veteran health-related social needs. DATA SOURCES AND SETTING: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with AmericaServes and VAMC staff across seven regional networks. We matched administrative data to calculate the percentage of AmericaServes referrals that were successfully resolved (i.e., requested support was provided) in each network overall and stratified by whether clients were also VAMC patients. STUDY DESIGN: Convergent parallel mixed-methods study guided by Himmelman's Developmental Continuum of Change Strategies (DCCS) for interorganizational collaboration. DATA COLLECTION: Fourteen AmericaServes staff and 17 VAMC staff across seven networks were recruited using snowball sampling and interviewed between October 2021 and April 2022. Rapid qualitative analysis methods were used to characterize the extent and determinants of VAMC participation in networks. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: On the DCCS continuum of participation, three networks were classified as networking, two as coordinating, one as cooperating, and one as collaborating. Barriers to moving from networking to collaborating included bureaucratic resistance to change, VAMC leadership buy-in, and not having VAMCs staff use the shared technology platform. Facilitators included ongoing communication, a shared mission of serving Veterans, and having designated points-of-contact between organizations. The percentage of referrals that were successfully resolved was lowest in networks engaged in networking (65.3%) and highest in cooperating (85.6%) and collaborating (83.1%) networks. For coordinating, cooperating, and collaborating networks, successfully resolved referrals were more likely among Veterans who were also VAMC patients than among Veterans served only by AmericaServes. CONCLUSIONS: VAMCs participate in AmericaServes Networks at varying levels. When partnerships are more advanced, successful resolution of referrals is more likely, especially among Veterans who are dually served by both organizations. Although challenges to establishing partnerships exist, this study highlights effective strategies to overcome them.