The superficial medial collateral ligament is the major restraint to anteromedial instability of the knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine how the medial structures and ACL contribute to restraining anteromedial instability of the knee. METHODS: Twenty-eight paired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested in a six-degree of freedom robotic setup. After sequentially cutting the dMCL, sMCL, POL and ACL in four different cutting orders, the following simulated clinical laxity tests were applied at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion: 4 Nm external tibial rotation (ER), 4 Nm internal tibial rotation (IR), 8 Nm valgus rotation (VR) and anteromedial rotation (AMR)-combined 89 N anterior tibial translation and 4 Nm ER. Knee kinematics were recorded in the intact state and after each cut using an optical tracking system. Differences in medial compartment translation (AMT) and tibial rotation (AMR, ER, IR, VR) from the intact state were then analyzed. RESULTS: The sMCL was the most important restraint to AMR, ER and VR at all flexion angles. Release of the proximal tibial attachment of the sMCL caused no significant increase in laxity if the distal sMCL attachment remained intact. The dMCL was a minor restraint to AMT and ER. The POL controlled IR and was a minor restraint to AMT and ER near extension. The ACL contributed with the sMCL in restraining AMT and was a secondary restraint to ER and VR in the MCL deficient knee. CONCLUSION: The sMCL appears to be the most important restraint to anteromedial instability; the dMCL and POL play more minor roles. Based on the present data a new classification of anteromedial instability is proposed, which may support clinical examination and treatment decision. In higher grades of anteromedial instability an injury to the sMCL should be suspected and addressed if treated surgically.

Measuring stiffness of normal medial collateral ligament in healthy volunteers via shear wave elastography.

PURPOSE: We aim to determine a reference data set for normal medial collateral ligament (MCL) stiffness values using shear wave elastography (SWE). METHODS: Quantitative stiffness of the MCL was measured at three levels: the proximal (MCL area from the level of the medial meniscus to the level of the femoral attachment), the middle (MCL area at the level of the medial meniscus), and the distal (MCL area from the level of the medial meniscus to the level of the tibial attachment) segments of the MCL at a knee position of 0°. RESULTS: A total of 60 MCL of 30 healthy volunteers (15 female, 15 male) were examined. The mean stiffness values of the proximal, middle, and distal MCL for observer 1 were 32.25 ± 6.44, 34.25 ± 6.84, and 35.47 ± 6.98, respectively. The mean stiffness values of the proximal, middle, and distal MCL for observer 2 were 33.56 ± 6.76, 35.44 ± 6.91, and 36.32 ± 7.04, respectively. CONCLUSION: SWE has a strong potential to be a method of choice for evaluating MCL stiffness. Our study participants were healthy volunteers and the data can be used as reference data for future studies.

Length-change patterns of the medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament in relation to their function and surgery.

PURPOSE: To define the length-change patterns of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), deep MCL (dMCL), and posterior oblique ligament (POL) across knee flexion and with applied anterior and rotational loads, and to relate these findings to their functions in knee stability and to surgical repair or reconstruction. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were mounted in a kinematics rig with loaded quadriceps, ITB, and hamstrings. Length changes of the anterior and posterior fibres of the sMCL, dMCL, and POL were recorded from 0° to 100° flexion by use of a linear displacement transducer and normalised to lengths at 0° flexion. Measurements were repeated with no external load, 90 N anterior draw force, and 5 Nm internal and 5 Nm external rotation torque applied. RESULTS: The anterior sMCL lengthened with flexion (p < 0.01) and further lengthened by external rotation (p < 0.001). The posterior sMCL slackened with flexion (p < 0.001), but was lengthened by internal rotation (p < 0.05). External rotation lengthened the anterior dMCL fibres by 10% throughout flexion (p < 0.001). sMCL release allowed the dMCL to become taut with valgus rotation (p < 0.001). The anterior and posterior POL fibres slackened with flexion (p < 0.001), but were elongated by internal rotation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The structures of the medial ligament complex react differently to knee flexion and applied loads. Structures attaching posterior to the medial epicondyle are taut in extension, whereas the anterior sMCL, attaching anterior to the epicondyle, is tensioned during flexion. The anterior dMCL is elongated by external rotation. These data offer the basis for MCL repair and reconstruction techniques regarding graft positioning and tensioning.

Single-bundle MCL reconstruction with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare knee kinematics and kinetics following either single bundle, modified triangular or double-bundle reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Using a cadaveric model (n = 10), the knee kinematics and kinetics following three MCL reconstructions (single-bundle (SB), double-bundle (DB), modified triangular) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction were compared with the intact and deficient knee state. The knees were tested under (1) an 89-N anterior tibial load, (2) 5 N-m internal and external rotational tibial torques, and (3) a 7 N-m valgus torque. RESULTS: Anatomic ACL reconstruction with SB MCL reconstruction was able to restore anterior tibial translation and external rotation to intact knee values but failed to the internal and valgus rotatory stability. Anatomical DB MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) and the modified triangular MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) restored all knee kinematics to the intact value. CONCLUSION: This study shows that clinical presentation with combined ACL and severe sMCL injury, single-bundle MCL with single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics. Anatomical double-bundle MCL reconstruction may produce slightly better biomechanical stability than the modified triangular MCL reconstruction, but the modified triangular reconstruction might be more clinically practical with the advantages of being less invasive and technically simpler while at the same time can restore a nearly normal knee joint.

Anatomical superficial medial collateral ligament reconstruction with posteromedial capsule reefing successfully restores valgus knee laxity.

The goal of this study was to present the results of an anatomical superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) reconstruction combined with reefing of the posteromedial capsule in a series of 10 patients with symptomatic valgus instability complaints in combined injuries of the knee. All patients under- went an sMCL reconstruction with reefing of the posteromedial capsule. If cruciate ligament insuf- ficiency was present, this was reconstructed as well. Pre- and postoperatively, multiple subjective knee outcome scores were obtained, and valgus stress radiographs objectively evaluated laxity. Median valgus laxity of the injured knee on valgus stress radiographs improved significantly. There was no statistically significant difference between post- operative valgus laxity of the injured knee and valgus laxity of the uninjured knee. All subjective knee outcome scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative situation. The described procedure restores valgus laxity to a level comparable to the uninjured knee.

Valgus stress radiography following superficial medial collateral ligament reconstruction using a modified LaPrade technique with adjustable loop femoral fixation.

Purpose of this study was to assess postoperative laxity of MCL reconstructions utilizing a modified LaPrade superficial MCL reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed post-operative valgus stress radiographs in 23 multiligament injured patients who underwent concurrent sMCL and cruciate ligament reconstruction by a single surgeon. Post- operatively, 23 patients underwent valgus stress radiographs that were assessed at a mean of 8.7 months (range: 4-13 months), and mean SSD was 0.64mm ± 0.42mm. Eight patients underwent both pre- and post-operative valgus stress radiographs. Post-operative (0.09mm ± 0.63mm) SSD was found to be significantly reduced compared to pre-operative (2.07mm ± 0.44mm) SSD (mean diff. = 1.98mm, 95% CI = 0.72-3.24, P=0.007). Inter-observer reliability value for medial compartment gap measurement was 0.91 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.34- 0.97. In conclusion, presented technique results in excellent static stability of the knee as measured by valgus stress radiography at a minimum of 6 months postoperative. Level of Evidence: IV.

Femoral Component External Rotation Affects Knee Biomechanics: A Computational Model of Posterior-stabilized TKA.

BACKGROUND: The correct amount of external rotation of the femoral component during TKA is controversial because the resulting changes in biomechanical knee function associated with varying degrees of femoral component rotation are not well understood. We addressed this question using a computational model, which allowed us to isolate the biomechanical impact of geometric factors including bony shapes, location of ligament insertions, and implant size across three different knees after posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a computational model of the tibiofemoral joint, we asked: (1) Does external rotation unload the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and what is the effect on lateral collateral ligament tension? (2) How does external rotation alter tibiofemoral contact loads and kinematics? (3) Does 3° external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis align the component to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) and what anatomic factors of the femoral condyle explain variations in maximum MCL tension among knees? METHODS: We incorporated a PS TKA into a previously developed computational knee model applied to three neutrally aligned, nonarthritic, male cadaveric knees. The computational knee model was previously shown to corroborate coupled motions and ligament loading patterns of the native knee through a range of flexion. Implant geometries were virtually installed using hip-to-ankle CT scans through measured resection and anterior referencing surgical techniques. Collateral ligament properties were standardized across each knee model by defining stiffness and slack lengths based on the healthy population. The femoral component was externally rotated from 0° to 9° relative to the posterior condylar axis in 3° increments. At each increment, the knee was flexed under 500 N compression from 0° to 90° simulating an intraoperative examination. The computational model predicted collateral ligament forces, compartmental contact forces, and tibiofemoral internal/external and varus-valgus rotation through the flexion range. RESULTS: The computational model predicted that femoral component external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis unloads the MCL and the medial compartment; however, these effects were inconsistent from knee to knee. When the femoral component was externally rotated by 9° rather than 0° in knees one, two, and three, the maximum force carried by the MCL decreased a respective 55, 88, and 297 N; the medial contact forces decreased at most a respective 90, 190, and 570 N; external tibial rotation in early flexion increased by a respective 4.6°, 1.1°, and 3.3°; and varus angulation of the tibia relative to the femur in late flexion increased by 8.4°, 8.0°, and 7.9°, respectively. With 3° of femoral component external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis, the femoral component was still externally rotated by up to 2.7° relative to the sTEA in these three neutrally aligned knees. Variations in MCL force from knee to knee with 3° of femoral component external rotation were related to the ratio of the distances from the femoral insertion of the MCL to the posterior and distal cuts of the implant; the closer this ratio was to 1, the more uniform were the MCL tensions from 0° to 90° flexion. CONCLUSIONS: A larger ratio of distances from the femoral insertion of the MCL to the posterior and distal cuts may cause clinically relevant increases in both MCL tension and compartmental contact forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To obtain more consistent ligament tensions through flexion, it may be important to locate the posterior and distal aspects of the femoral component with respect to the proximal insertion of the MCL such that a ratio of 1 is achieved.

Raising the Joint Line in TKA is Associated With Mid-flexion Laxity: A Study in Cadaver Knees.

BACKGROUND: In a typical osteoarthritic knee with varus deformity, distal femoral resection based off the worn medial femoral condyle may result in an elevated joint line. In a setting of fixed flexion contracture, the surgeon may choose to resect additional distal femur to obtain extension, thus purposefully raising the joint line. However, the biomechanical effect of raising the joint line is not well recognized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the effect of the level of the medial joint line (restored versus raised) on coronal plane stability of a TKA? (2) Does coronal alignment technique (mechanical axis versus kinematic technique) affect coronal plane stability of the knee? (3) Can the effect of medial joint-line elevation on coronal plane laxity be predicted by an analytical model? METHODS: A TKA prosthesis was implanted in 10 fresh frozen nonarthritic cadaveric knees with restoration of the medial joint line at its original level (TKA0). Coronal plane stability was measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° flexion using a navigation system while applying an instrumented 9.8-Nm varus and valgus force moment. The joint line then was raised in two steps by recutting the distal and posterior femur by an extra 2 mm (TKA2) and 4 mm (TKA4), downsizing the femoral component and, respectively, adding a 2- and a 4-mm thicker insert. This was done with meticulous protection of the ligaments to avoid damage. Second, a simplified two-dimensional analytical model of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) length based on a single flexion-extension axis was developed. The effect of raising the joint line on the length of the superficial MCL was simulated. RESULTS: Despite that at 0° (2.2° ± 1.5° versus 2.3° ± 1.1° versus 2.5° ± 1.1°; p = 0.85) and 90° (7.5° ± 1.9° versus 9.0° ± 3.1° versus 9.0° ± 3.5°; p = 0.66), there was no difference in coronal plane laxity between the TKA0, TKA2, and TKA4 positions, increased laxity at 30° (4.8° ± 1.9° versus 7.9° ± 2.3° versus 10.2° ± 2.0°; p < 0.001) and 60° (5.7° ± 2.7° versus 8.8° ± 2.9° versus 11.3° ± 2.9°; p < 0.001) was observed when the medial joint line was raised 2 and 4 mm. At 30°, this corresponds to an average increase of 64% (3.1°; p < 0.01) in mid-flexion laxity with a 2-mm raised joint line and a 111% (5.4°; p < 0.01) increase with a 4-mm raised joint line compared with the 9-mm baseline resection. No differences in coronal alignment were found between the knees implanted with kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment at any flexion angle. The analytical model was consistent with the cadaveric findings and showed lengthening of the superficial MCL in mid-flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a well-balanced knee in full extension and at 90° flexion, increased mid-flexion laxity in the coronal plane was evident in the specimens where the joint line was raised. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When recutting the distal and posterior femur and downsizing the femoral component, surgeons should be aware that this action might increase the laxity in mid-flexion, even if the knee is stable at 0° and 90°.

Knee Abduction Affects Greater Magnitude of Change in ACL and MCL Strains Than Matched Internal Tibial Rotation In Vitro.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injures incur over USD 2 billion in annual medical costs and prevention has become a topic of interest in biomechanics. However, literature conflicts persist over how knee rotations contribute to ACL strain and ligament injury. To maximize the efficacy of ACL injury prevention, the effects of underlying mechanics need to be better understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We applied robotically controlled, in vivo-derived kinematic stimuli to the knee to assess ligament biomechanics in a cadaver model. We asked: (1) Does the application of abduction rotation increase ACL and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain relative to the normal condition? (2) Does the application of internal tibial rotation impact ACL strain relative to the neutral condition? (3) Does combined abduction and internal tibial rotation increase ligament strain more than either individual contribution? METHODS: A six-degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator was used to position 17 cadaveric specimens free from knee pathology outside of low-grade osteoarthritis (age, 47 ± 8 years; 13 males, four females) into orientations that mimic initial contact recorded from in vivo male and female drop vertical jump and sidestep cutting activities. Four-degree rotational perturbations were applied in both directions from the neutral alignment position (creating an 8° range) for each frontal, transverse, and combined planes while ACL and MCL strains were continuously recorded with DVRT strain gauges implanted directly on each ligament. Analysis of variance models with least significant difference post hoc analysis were used to assess differences in ligament strain and joint loading between sex, ligament condition, or motion task and rotation type. RESULTS: For the female drop vertical jump simulation in the intact knee, isolated abduction and combined abduction/internal rotational stimuli produced the greatest change in strain from the neutral position as compared with all other stimuli within the ACL (1.5% ± 1.0%, p ≤ 0.035; 1.8% ± 1.3%, p ≤ 0.005) and MCL (1.8% ± 1.0%, p < 0.001; 1.6% ± 1.3%, p < 0.001) compared with all other applied stimuli. There were no differences in mean peak ACL strain between any rotational stimuli (largest mean difference = 2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9% to 5.0%; p = 0.070). These trends were consistent for all four simulated tasks. Peak ACL strain in the intact knee was larger than peak MCL strain for all applied rotational stimuli in the drop vertical jump simulations (smallest mean difference = 2.1%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 4.5%; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Kinematically constrained cadaveric knee models using peak strain as an outcome variable require greater than 4° rotational perturbations to elicit changes in intraarticular ligaments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because combined rotations and isolated abduction produced greater change in strain relative to the neutral position for the ACL and MCL than any other rotational stimuli in this cadaver study, hypotheses for in vivo investigations aimed toward injury prevention that focuses on the reduction of frontal plane knee motion should be considered. Furthermore, reduced strain in the MCL versus the ACL may help explain why only 30% of ACL ruptures exhibit concomitant MCL injuries.

What Factors Are Associated With Femoral Component Internal Rotation in TKA Using the Gap Balancing Technique?

BACKGROUND: When using the gap-balancing technique for TKA, excessive medial release and varus proximal tibial resection can be associated with internal rotation of the femoral component. Previous studies have evaluated the causes of femoral component rotational alignment with a separate factor analysis using unadjusted statistical methods, which might result in treatment effects being attributed to confounding variables. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What pre- and intraoperative factors are associated with internal rotation of the femoral component in TKA using the gap balancing technique? (2) To what degree does femoral component rotation as defined by the navigation system differ from rotation as measured by postoperative CT? METHODS: Three hundred seventy-seven knees that underwent computer-assisted primary TKA attributable to degenerative osteoarthritis with varus or mild valgus alignment in which medial soft tissue release was performed, and those with preoperative radiographs including preoperative CT between October 2007 and June 2014 were included in the study. To achieve a balanced mediolateral gap, the structures released during each medial release step were as follows: Step 1, deep medial collateral ligament (MCL); Step 2, superficial MCL (proximal, above the pes anserine tendon) and semimembranosus tendon; and Step 3, the superficial MCL (distal, below the pes anserine tendon). Knees with internal rotation of the femoral component, which was directed by navigation, to achieve a rectangular mediolateral flexion gap were considered cases, and knees without internally rotated femoral components were considered controls. Univariable analysis of the variables (age, sex, BMI, operated side, preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, preoperative medial proximal tibial angle, preoperative rotation degree of the clinical transepicondylar axis [TEA] relative to the posterior condylar axis [PCA], coronal angle of resected tibia, resection of the posterior cruciate ligament, type of prosthesis, and extent of medial release) of cases and controls was performed, followed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis on those factors where p equals 0.15 or less. For an evaluation of navigation error, 88 knees that underwent postoperative CT were analyzed. Postoperative CT scans were obtained for patients with unexplained pain or stiffness after the operations. Using the paired t-test and Pearson's correlation analysis, the postoperative TEA-PCA measured with postoperative CT was compared with theoretical TEA-PCA, which was calculated with preoperative TEA-PCA and actual femoral component rotation checked by the navigation system. RESULTS: After controlling for a relevant confounding variable such as postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, we found that the extent of medial release (Step 1 as reference; Step 2: odds ratio [OR], 5.7, [95% CI, 2.2-15]; Step 3: OR, 22, [95% CI, 7.8-62], p < 0.001) was the only factor we identified that was associated with internal rotation of the femoral component. With the numbers available, we found no difference between the mean theoretical postoperative TEA-PCA and the postoperative TEA-PCA measured using postoperative CT (4.8° ± 2.7º versus 5.0° ± 2.3º; mean difference, 0.2° ± 1.5º; p = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS: Extent of medial release was the only factor we identified that was associated with internal rotation of the femoral component in gap-balancing TKA. To avoid internal rotation of the femoral component, we recommend a carefully subdivided medial-releasing technique, especially for the superficial MCL because once the superficial MCL has been completely released it cannot easily be restored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Assessment of knee laxity using a robotic testing device: a comparison to the manual clinical knee examination.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to collect knee laxity data using a robotic testing device. The data collected were then compared to the results obtained from manual clinical examination. METHODS: Two human cadavers were studied. A medial collateral ligament (MCL) tear was simulated in the left knee of cadaver 1, and a posterolateral corner (PLC) injury was simulated in the right knee of cadaver 2. Contralateral knees were left intact. Five blinded examiners carried out manual clinical examination on the knees. Laxity grades and a diagnosis were recorded. Using a robotic knee device which can measure knee laxity in three planes of motion: anterior-posterior, internal-external tibia rotation, and varus-valgus, quantitative data were obtained to document tibial motion relative to the femur. RESULTS: One of the five examiners correctly diagnosed the MCL injury. Robotic testing showed a 1.7° larger valgus angle, 3° greater tibial internal rotation, and lower endpoint stiffness (11.1 vs. 24.6 Nm/°) in the MCL-injured knee during varus-valgus testing when compared to the intact knee and 4.9 mm greater medial tibial translation during rotational testing. Two of the five examiners correctly diagnosed the PLC injury, while the other examiners diagnosed an MCL tear. The PLC-injured knee demonstrated 4.1 mm more lateral tibial translation and 2.2 mm more posterior tibial translation during varus-valgus testing when compared to the intact knee. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic testing device was able to provide objective numerical data that reflected differences between the injured knees and the uninjured knees in both cadavers. The examiners that performed the manual clinical examination on the cadaver knees proved to be poor at diagnosing the injuries. Robotic testing could act as an adjunct to the manual clinical examination by supplying numbers that could improve diagnosis of knee injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Minimal effect of patella eversion on ligament balancing in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The effect of patellar eversion on ligament laxity measurements is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of patellar eversion on medial and lateral ligament laxity measurements performed intra-operatively in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A total of 49 knees (27 female) with mean age 70 years (42-83) and mean body mass index of 28.5 were operated consecutively with a cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Medial and lateral ligament laxity in extension and in 90° of flexion was measured with the spatula-method intra-operatively after implantation of the prosthetic components with the patella everted and thereafter with the patella repositioned. The corresponding changes in gap height and inclination were calculated. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase of 0.6 mm (p < 0.001) in ligament laxity (condylar lift-off) laterally in flexion was found with the patella repositioned compared to everted. No differences were found in extension or medially in flexion. Correspondingly, the flexion gap increased by 0.4 mm (p < 0.001) and the flexion gap inclination increased by 0.6° (p = 0.002) when the patella was repositioned. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier research has shown that ligament laxity must be at least 1-2 mm to cause inferior function after TKA. In the current study, we found that the effect of patellar eversion on ligament laxity measurements is too small to be considered clinically relevant. PROSPECTIVE STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Level II.

Balancing UKA: overstuffing leads to high medial collateral ligament strains.

PURPOSE: Balancing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is challenging. If not performed properly, it may lead to implant loosening or progression of osteoarthritis in the preserved compartment. This study was aimed to document the biomechanical effects of improper balancing. We hypothesised that overstuffing would lead to more valgus, higher strain in the medial collateral ligament (sMCL), and higher lateral contact force. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were mounted in a kinematic rig. Three motion patterns were applied with the native knee and following medial UKA (passive motion, open-chain extension, and squatting), while infrared cameras recorded the trajectories of markers attached to femur and tibia. Three inlay thicknesses were tested (8, 9, 10 mm). RESULTS: Overstuffed knees were in more valgus and showed less tibial rotation and higher strains in the sMCL (p < 0.05). Lateral contact forces were higher in some specimens and lower in others. Stiffening of the medial compartment by UKA, even well balanced, already leads to a knee more in valgus with a more stressed sMCL. Overstuffing increases these effects. Knees with a tight sMCL may even see lower lateral contact force. Biomechanics were closest to the native knee with understuffing. CONCLUSION: The first two hypotheses were confirmed, but not the latter. This underlines the importance of optimal balancing. Overstuffing should certainly be avoided. Although kinematics is only slightly affected, contact forces and ligament strains are considerably changed and this might be of more clinical importance. It is advisable to use thinner inlays, if stability is not compromised.

The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the contributions of medial soft tissues to stability following cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Using a robotic system, eight cadaveric knees were subjected to ±90-N anterior-posterior force, ±5-Nm internal-external and ±8-Nm varus-valgus torques at various flexion angles. The knees were tested intact and then with CR and PS implants, and successive cuts of the deep and superficial medial collateral ligaments (dMCL, sMCL) and posteromedial capsule (PMC) quantified the percentage contributions of each structure to restraining the applied loads. RESULTS: In implanted knees, the sMCL restrained valgus rotation (62 % across flexion angles), anterior-posterior drawer (24 and 10 %, respectively) and internal-external rotation (22 and 37 %). Changing from CR TKA to PS TKA increased the load on the sMCL when resisting valgus loads. The dMCL restrained 11 % of external and 13 % of valgus rotations, and the PMC was significant at low flexion angles. CONCLUSIONS: This work has shown that medial release in the varus knee should be minimised, as it may inadvertently result in a combined laxity pattern. There is increasing interest in preserving constitutional varus in TKA, and this work argues for preservation of the sMCL to afford the surgeon consistent restraint and maintain a balanced knee for the patient.

Combined effect of ligament stem cells and umbilical-cord-blood-derived CD34+ cells on ligament healing.

Transplantation of ligament-tissue-derived stem cells has become a promising approach in the repair of injured ligament. Neovascularization plays an important role in ligament healing and remodeling. Recently, human umbilical-cord-blood-derived CD34+ cells have been reported to contribute to neoangiogenesis. Therefore, we performed a series of experiments to test our hypothesis that the combination of medial collateral ligament stem cells (MCL-SCs) and umbilical-cord-blood-derived CD34+ cells has synergistic effects on tendon healing. MCL-SCs and umbilical-cord-blood-derived CD34+ cells were isolated and cultured. Rat MCL injury was treated by MCL-SCs and/or CD34+ cells. Response to the cell therapy was assessed by gross observation, histological evaluation and biomechanical testing at 2 and 4 weeks after each treatment. Although each cell therapy group induced macroscopic and morphological recovery in healing MCLs, the combined use of MCL-SCs/CD34+ cells led to further improvement in healing quality. Capillary density was significantly higher in the CD34+ cell transplantation groups than in the other groups at week 2. Biomechanical testing demonstrated that the failure load of the healing ligament was greatest in the combination therapy group. The combination of MCL-SCs and CD34+ cells as a cell therapeutic thus enhances healing and restores biomechanical function toward normal after MCL injury. The findings obtained in our study suggest that the combination of MCL-SCs and CD34+ cells transplantation represents a promising strategy for ligament injury.

Intraoperative ligament laxity influences functional outcome 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To find out if there is an association between ligament laxity measured intraoperatively and functional outcome 1 year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Medial and lateral ligament laxities were measured intraoperatively in extension and in 90° of flexion in 108 patients [122 knees; median age 70 (range 42-83) years]. Mechanical axes were measured preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, the Oxford Knee Score and patient satisfaction. The relationships between laxity and outcome scores were examined by median regression analyses. RESULTS: Post-operative mechanical axis had a significant effect on the association between ligament laxity and KOOS. Therefore, the material was stratified on post-operative mechanical axis. In perfectly aligned and valgus-aligned TKAs, there was a negative correlation between medial laxity and all subscores in KOOS. The most important regression coefficient (ß) was recorded for the effect of medial laxity in extension on activities of daily living (ADLs) (ß = -7.32, p < 0.001), sport/recreation (ß = -6.9, p = 0.017) and pain (ß = -5.9, p = 0.006), and for the effect of medial laxity in flexion on ADLs (ß = -3.11, p = 0.023) and sport/recreation (ß = -4.18, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve the functional results after TKA, orthopaedic surgeons should monitor ligament laxity and mechanical axis intraoperatively and avoid medial laxity more than 2 mm in extension and 3 mm in flexion in neutral and valgus-aligned knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The biomechanical effect of increased valgus on total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

The effects of valgus load on cadaveric knees following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were investigated using a custom testing system. TKAs were performed on 8 cadaveric knees and tested at 0°, 30°, and 60° knee flexion in both neutral and 5° valgus. Fuji pressure sensitive film was used to quantify contact areas and pressures and MCL strain was determined using a Microscribe digitizing system. Lateral tibiofemoral pressures increased (P < 0.05) at all knee flexion angles with valgus loading. Patellofemoral contact characteristics did not change significantly (P > 0.05). Significant increases in strain were observed along the anterior and posterior border of the MCL at all knee flexion angles. These findings suggest that valgus loading increases TKA joint contact pressures and MCL strain with increasing knee flexion which may increase implant instability.

Ligament reconstruction/advancement for management of instability due to ligament insufficiency during total knee arthroplasty: a viable alternative to constrained implant.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the results of ligament reconstruction/advancement for the management of ligament insufficiency during total knee arthroplasty. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the results of ligament reconstruction/advancement for management of instability due to ligament insufficiency during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Between January 2001 and January 2008 collateral ligament reconstruction/advancement was done in 15 patients. Wherever ligament advancement was not possible (mid-substance tear) ligament reconstruction was done using the hamstring tendon. Knee society scores were calculated and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was done. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 6.2 years. No patient developed instability until the last follow-up, except one patient who required revision due to instability at six years after primary surgery. CONCLUSION: We concluded from this study that ligament reconstruction/advancement during TKA is a viable option to address instability due to ligament insufficiency.

Effect of a Partial Superficial and Deep Medial Collateral Ligament Injury on Knee Joint Laxity.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), specifically the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL), are both reported to be factors in anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI); however, a partial sMCL (psMCL) injury is often present, the effect of which on AMRI is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a dMCL injury with or without a psMCL injury on knee joint laxity. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was cut first and last in protocols 1 and 2, respectively. The dMCL was cut completely, followed by an intermediary psMCL injury state before the sMCL was completely sectioned. Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 4 N·m of external tibial rotation, 4 N·m of internal tibial rotation, and combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 4 N·m of external tibial rotation for both anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation. The differences between subsequent states, as well as differences with respect to the intact state, were analyzed. RESULTS: In an ACL-intact or -deficient joint, a combined dMCL and psMCL injury increased external tibial rotation and VR compared with the intact state at all angles. A significant increase in AMR was seen in the ACL-intact knee after this combined injury. Cutting the dMCL alone showed lower mean increases in AMR compared with the psMCL injury, which were significant only when the ACL was intact in knee flexion. Moreover, cutting the dMCL had no effect on VR. The ACL was the most important structure in controlling anteromedial translation, followed by the psMCL or dMCL depending on the knee flexion angle. CONCLUSION: A dMCL injury alone may produce a small increase in AMRI but not in VR. A combined dMCL and psMCL injury caused an increase in AMRI and VR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In clinical practice, if an increase in AMRI at 30° and 90° of knee flexion is seen together with some increase in VR, a combined dMCL and psMCL injury should be suspected.