RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is crucial to understand the trends in paediatric antibiotic prescribing and serious and nonserious infections to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for children in ambulatory care. OBJECTIVES: Assessing trends in paediatric antibiotic prescribing and infection incidence in general practice from 2002 to 2022. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study using INTEGO network data from 162â507 patients in Flanders (Belgium), we calculated antibiotic prescribing rates and proportions alongside incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections, stratified by age (0-1, 2-6, 7-12â years) and municipality. We performed autoregressive moving average time-series analyses and seasonality analyses. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2022, antibiotic prescribing rate decreased significantly: 584/1000 person-years (PY) (95% CI 571-597) to 484/1000PY (95% CI 478-491); so did antibiotic overall prescribing proportion: 46.3% (95% CI 45.1-47.6) to 23.3% (95% CI 22.9-23.7) (59.3% amoxicillin and 17.8% broad spectrum). Prescribing proportions dropped significantly for nonserious (45.6% to 20.9%) and increased for serious infections (64.1% to 69.8%). Proportions significantly dropped for acute suppurative otitis media (74.7% to 64.1%), upper respiratory tract infections (44.9% to 16.6%), bronchitis/bronchiolitis (73.6% to 44.1%) and acute tonsillopharyngitis (59.5% to 21.7%), while significantly increasing for pneumonia (65.2% to 80.2%). Nonserious and serious infection incidence rates increased from 785/1000PY and 34.2/1000PY to 1223/1000PY and 64.1/1000PY, respectively. Blood and CRP testing proportions increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prescribing in general practice for children declined from 2002 to 2022. Further targeted antibiotic stewardship initiatives are needed to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and antibiotic prescribing for conditions such as otitis media and bronchitis/bronchiolitis.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Longitudinais , Recém-Nascido , Incidência , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Otite Média/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Attempts to manage the COVID-19 pandemic have led to radical reorganisations of health care systems worldwide. General practitioners (GPs) provide the vast majority of patient care, and knowledge of their experiences with providing care for regular health issues during a pandemic is scarce. Hence, in a Danish context we explored how GPs experienced reorganising their work in an attempt to uphold sufficient patient care while contributing to minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Further, in relation to this, we examined what guided GPs' choices between telephone, video and face-to-face consultations. METHODS: This study consisted of qualitative interviews with 13 GPs. They were interviewed twice, approximately three months apart in the initial phase of the pandemic, and they took daily notes for 20 days. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and inductively analysed. RESULTS: The GPs re-organised their clinical work profoundly. Most consultations were converted to video or telephone, postponed or cancelled. The use of video first rose, but soon declined, once again replaced by an increased use of face-to-face consultations. When choosing between consultation forms, the GPs took into account the need to minimise the risk of COVID-19, the central guidelines, and their own preference for face-to-face consultations. There were variations over time and between the GPs regarding which health issues were dealt with by using video and/or the telephone. For some health issues, the GPs generally deemed it acceptable to use video or telephone, postpone or cancel appointments for a short term, and in a crisis situation. They experienced relational and technical limitations with video consultation, while diagnostic uncertainty was not regarded as a prominent issue CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how the GPs experienced telephone and video consultations as being useful in a pandemic situation when face-to-face consultations had to be severely restricted. The GPs did, however, identify several limitations similar to those known in non-pandemic times. The weighing of pros and cons and their willingness to use these alternatives shifted and generally diminished when face-to-face consultations were once again deemed viable. In case of future pandemics, such alternatives seem valuable, at least for a short term.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Medicina Geral/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Consulta Remota/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pandemias , Relações Médico-Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/organização & administração , Telefone , Comunicação por VideoconferênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the potential decrease in access and utilisation of general practice services and its impact on patient care. In March 2020, the Australian Government introduced telehealth services to ensure that people more vulnerable to COVID-19 do not delay routine care from their general practitioners. Evidence about patients' experience of telehealth and its impact on patient care is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the experience with telehealth by Australian general practice patients at high risk of poor health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 30 patients from nine general practices in metropolitan Adelaide (May-June 2020). Participants were identified by their regular doctor as being at high risk of poor health outcomes. Interviews sought participants' perspectives and experiences about telehealth services in the general practice setting during COVID-19, and the value of offering continued telehealth services post pandemic. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a coding structure developed based on deductive codes derived from the research questions and any additional concepts that emerged inductively from interviews. RESULTS: Participants expressed satisfaction with telehealth including convenient and timely access to general practice services. Yet, participants identified challenges including difficulties in expressing themselves and accessing physical exams. Prescription renewal, discussing test results and simple follow-ups were the most common reasons that telehealth was used. Telehealth was mainly via phone that better suited those with low digital literacy. Participants indicated that an existing doctor-patient relationship was important for telehealth services to be effective. Subjects believed that telehealth services should be continued but needed to be combined with opportunities for face-to-face consultations after the COVID-19 pandemic was over. CONCLUSIONS: The expansion of telehealth supported access to general practice including chronic disease management during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the future, telehealth in Australia is likely to have a stronger place in primary healthcare policy and practice and an increased acceptance amongst patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença Crônica , Medicina Geral , Relações Médico-Paciente , Medição de Risco/métodos , Telemedicina , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Pesquisa Qualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, general practices were asked to expand triage and to reduce unnecessary face-to-face contact by prioritizing other consultation modes, e.g., online messaging, video, or telephone. The current study explores the potential barriers and facilitators general practitioners experienced to expanding triage systems and their attitudes towards triage during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: A mixed-method study design was used in which a quantitative online survey was conducted along with qualitative interviews to gain a more nuanced appreciation for practitioners' experiences in the United Kingdom. The survey items were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework so they would capture 14 behavioral factors that may influence whether practitioners use triage systems. Items were responded to using seven-point Likert scales. A median score was calculated for each item. The responses of participants identifying as part-owners and non-owners (i.e., "partner" vs. "non-partner" practitioners) were compared. The semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely and examined using Braun and Clark's thematic analysis. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 204 participants (66% Female). Most participants (83%) reported triaging patients. The items with the highest median scores captured the 'Knowledge,' 'Skills,' 'Social/Professional role and identity,' and 'Beliefs about capabilities' domains. The items with the lowest median scores captured the 'Beliefs about consequences,' 'Goals,' and 'Emotions' domains. For 14 of the 17 items, partner scores were higher than non-partner scores. All the qualitative interview participants relied on a phone triage system. Six broad themes were discovered: patient accessibility, confusions around what triage is, uncertainty and risk, relationships between service providers, job satisfaction, and the potential for total digital triage. Suggestions arose to optimize triage, such as ensuring there is sufficient time to conduct triage accurately and providing practical training to use triage efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Many general practitioners are engaging with expanded triage systems, though more support is needed to achieve total triage across practices. Non-partner practitioners likely require more support to use the triage systems that practices take up. Additionally, practical support should be made available to help all practitioners manage the new risks and uncertainties they are likely to experience during non-face-to-face consultations.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina Geral , Clínicos Gerais , Consulta Remota , Triagem , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Competência Clínica , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Medicina Geral/normas , Medicina Geral/tendências , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Clínicos Gerais/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/ética , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Consulta Remota/ética , Consulta Remota/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/tendências , SARS-CoV-2 , Triagem/ética , Triagem/métodos , Triagem/organização & administração , Triagem/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health services internationally have been compelled to change their methods of service delivery in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, to mitigate the spread of infection amongst health professionals and patients. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, widespread electronic delivery of prescriptions (e-prescribing) was enabled. The aim of the research was to explore patients' experiences of how lockdown, changes to prescribing and the interface between general practices and community pharmacy affected access to prescription medications. METHOD: The research employed a mixed-method approach. This included an online survey (n = 1,010) and in-depth interviews with a subset of survey respondents (n = 38) during the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-May 2020). Respondents were recruited through a snowballing approach, starting with social media and email list contacts of the research team. In keeping with the approach, descriptive statistics of survey data and thematic analysis of qualitative interview and open-ended questions in survey data were combined. RESULTS: For most respondents who received a prescription during lockdown, this was sent directly to the pharmacy. Most people picked up their medication from the pharmacy; home delivery of medication was rare (4%). Survey and interview respondents wanted e-prescribing to continue post-lockdown and described where things worked well and where they encountered delays in the process of acquiring prescription medication. CONCLUSIONS: E-prescribing has the potential to improve access to prescription medication and is convenient for patients. The increase in e-prescribing during lockdown highlighted how the system could be improved, through better feedback about errors, more consistency across practices and pharmacies, more proactive communication with patients, and equitable prescribing costs.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde , Prescrição Eletrônica , Medicina Geral , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/normas , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Prescrição Eletrônica/economia , Prescrição Eletrônica/normas , Prescrição Eletrônica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
AIM: The goal of this study was to analyze and quantify the usage of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in different diseases and settings in Germany. METHODS: This retrospective study, based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA), included patients from 550 general practices (GP) and 73 neurological practices. Patients who had received at least one prescription for AED from one of these practices between January 2009 and December 2011 (time period 1, nâ¯=â¯39,434) or between January 2016 and December 2018 (time period 2, nâ¯=â¯49,128) were analyzed. RESULTS: In patients who received AED prescriptions from neurologists, epilepsy (43%) was the most common diagnosis and did not change over time. The proportion of pain diagnoses slightly decreased from 35% in the period from 2009 to 2011 to 34% in the period from 2016 to 2018, while psychiatric disorders increased from 13% to 15%. In GPs, 58% of patients received their AED prescriptions for pain disorders, followed by epilepsy (29%) in the period from 2009 to 2011. The proportion of pain patients slightly increased to 60%, while that of patients with epilepsy slightly decreased to 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The main indications for which AEDs are prescribed vary with the type of medical practice. The different indications for different AEDs changed between the two time periods, which is in line with the state of the research.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Medicina Geral/tendências , Neurologia/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Medicina Geral/métodos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurologia/métodos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) increasingly manage patients with multimorbidity but report challenges in doing so. Patients describe poor experiences with health care systems that treat each of their health conditions separately, resulting in fragmented, uncoordinated care. For GPs to provide the patient-centred, coordinated care patients need and want, research agendas and health system structures and policies will need to adapt to address this epidemiologic transition. This systematic review seeks to understand if and how multimorbidity impacts on the work of GPs, the strategies they employ to manage challenges, and what they believe still needs addressing to ensure quality patient care. METHODS: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies reporting GP experiences of managing patients with multimorbidity. The search included nine major databases, grey literature sources, Google and Google Scholar, a hand search of Journal of Comorbidity, and the reference lists of included studies. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies from fourteen countries were included. Three major challenges were identified: practising without supportive evidence; working within a fragmented health care system whose policies and structures remain organised around single condition care and specialisation; and the clinical uncertainty associated with multimorbidity complexity and general practitioner perceptions of decisional risk. GPs revealed three approaches to mitigating these challenges: prioritising patient-centredness and relational continuity; relying on knowledge of patient preferences and unique circumstances to individualise care; and structuring the consultation to create a sense of time and minimise patient risk. CONCLUSIONS: GPs described an ongoing tension between applying single condition guidelines to patients with multimorbidity as security against uncertainty or penalty, and potentially causing patients harm. Above all, they chose to prioritise their long-term relationships for the numerous gains this brought such as mutual trust, deeper insight into a patient's unique circumstances, and useable knowledge of each individual's capacity for the work of illness and goals for life. GPs described a need for better multimorbidity management guidance. Perhaps more than this, they require policies and models of practice that provide remunerated time and space for nurturing trustful therapeutic partnerships.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Multimorbidade/tendências , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Medicina Geral/tendências , Transição Epidemiológica , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children's mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children's mental health in general practice. METHODS: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child's mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child's mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Transtornos Mentais , Psicometria , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/prevenção & controle , Saúde Mental/normas , Pais/educação , Pais/psicologia , Papel do Médico , Psiquiatria Preventiva/métodos , Psicometria/métodos , Psicometria/normas , Psicopatologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Amidst increased pressures on General Practice across England, the receptionist continues to fulfil key administrative and clinically related tasks. The need for more robust support for these key personnel to ensure they stay focussed and motivated is apparent, however, to be effective a more systematic understanding of the parameters of their work is required. Here we present a valuable insight into the tasks they fulfil, their relationship with colleagues and their organisation and their attitudes and behaviour at work collectively defined as their 'work design'. METHODS: Our aim was to quantitatively assess the various characteristics of receptionists in primary care in England using the validated Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ) a 21 point validated questionnaire, divided into four categories: task, knowledge and social characteristics and work context with a series of sub-categories within each, disseminated online and as a postal questionnaire to 100 practices nationally. RESULTS: Seventy participants completed the WDQ, 54 online and 16 using the postal questionnaire with the response rate for the latter being 3.1%. The WDQ suggested receptionists experience high levels of task variety, task significance and of information processing and knowledge demands, confirming the high cognitive load placed on receptionists by performing numerous yet significant tasks. Perhaps in relation to these substantial responsibilities a reliance on colleagues for support and feedback to help negotiate this workload was reported. CONCLUSION: The evidence of our survey suggests that the role of modern GP receptionists requires an array of skills to accommodate various administrative, communicative, problem solving, and decision-making duties. There are ways in which the role might be better supported for example devising ways to separate complex tasks to avoid the errors involved with high cognitive load, providing informal feedback, and perhaps most importantly developing training programmes.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Relações Interpessoais , Descrição de Cargo , Recepcionistas de Consultório Médico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Habilidades Sociais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Desempenho Profissional/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Inglaterra , Feminino , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Recepcionistas de Consultório Médico/psicologia , Recepcionistas de Consultório Médico/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Papel Profissional , Responsabilidade Social , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Carga de Trabalho/psicologia , Carga de Trabalho/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: PaTz (palliative care at home) is a method to improve palliative care in the primary care setting in the Netherlands. PaTz has three basic principles: (1) local GPs and DNs meet at least six times per year to identify and discuss their patients with a life-threatening illness; (2) these meetings are supervised by a specialist palliative care professional; (3) groups use a palliative care register on which all identified patients are listed. Since the start in 2010, the number of PaTz-groups in the Netherlands has been growing consistently. Although the theory of all PaTz-groups is the same, the practical functioning of PaTz-groups may vary substantially, which may complicate further implementation of PaTz as well as interpretation of effect studies. This study aims to describe the variation in practice of PaTz-groups in the Netherlands. METHOD: In this prospective observational study, ten PaTz-groups logged and described the activities in their meetings as well as the registered and discussed patients and topics of discussions in registration forms for a 1 year follow-up period. In addition, non-participatory observations were performed in all participating groups. Meeting and patient characteristics were analysed using descriptive statistics. Conventional content analysis was performed in the analysis of topic discussions. RESULTS: While the basic principles of PaTz are found in almost every PaTz-group, there is considerable variation in the practice and content of the meetings of different PaTz-groups. Most groups spend little time on other topics than their patients, although the number of patients discussed in a single meeting varies considerably, as well as the time spent on an individual patient. Most registered patients were diagnosed with cancer and patient discussions mainly concerned current affairs and rarely concerned future issues. CONCLUSION: The basic principles are the cornerstone of any PaTz-group. At the same time, the observed variation between PaTz-groups indicates that tailoring a PaTz-group to the needs of its participants is important and may enhance its sustainability. The flexibility of PaTz-groups may also provide opportunity to modify the content and tools used, and improve identification of palliative patients and advance care planning.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/tendências , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
In many countries, private companies provide primary care services based predominantly on offering video consultations via smartphones. One example is Babylon GP at Hand (BGPaH), which offers video consultations to National Health Service patients, 24 hours a day, and has grown rapidly in London over the last 3 years. The development of this type of service has been controversial, particularly in the United Kingdom, but there has been little formal published evaluation of these services in any country. This paper outlines the main controversies about the use of privately provided video consultation services for primary care and shows how they are informed by the limited evaluations that have been conducted, particularly the evaluation of BGPaH. This paper describes the advantages of these services in terms of convenience, speed of access, the ability to consult without traveling or face-to-face patient-doctor contact, and the possibility of recruiting doctors who cannot work in conventional settings or do not live near the patients. It also highlights the concerns and uncertainties about quality and safety, demand, fragmentation of care, impact on other health services, efficiency, and equity. There are questions about whether private primary care services based on video consultations have a sustainable business model and whether they will undermine other health care providers. During the recent COVID-19 pandemic, the use of video consulting has become more widespread within conventional primary care services, and this is likely to have lasting consequences for the future delivery of primary care. It is important to understand the extent to which lessons from the evaluation of BGPaH and other private services based on a video-first model are relevant to the use of video consulting within conventional general practices, and to consider the advantages and disadvantages of these developments, before video consultation-based services in primary care become more widely established.
Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/tendências , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Relações Médico-Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal/tendências , Reino UnidoRESUMO
General internal medicine is particularly concerned by the shift from stationary to ambulatory care, a shift that unfortunately is more often discussed from an economic perspective than from the angle of evidence. This article presents the results of studies and reviews published in 2019 that investigated the effectiveness of ambulatory instead of stationary care.
La médecine interne générale est particulièrement concernée par le virage ambulatoire, virage malheureusement plus souvent discuté sous l'angle économique que sous l'angle des évidences. Cet article présente les résultats d'études et de revues publiées en 2019 et ayant investigué l'efficacité de prises en charge ambulatoires en complément ou en remplacement de prises en charge stationnaires.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Medicina Geral , Medicina Interna , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Medicina Interna/tendênciasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to analyze trends in valproate use in patients followed by neurologists and general practitioners in Germany between 2009 and 2017. METHODS: This study included all patients aged ≥15â¯years followed in 2009, 2013, and 2017 in neurological (Nâ¯=â¯99) and general (Nâ¯=â¯499) practices in Germany. Trends in valproate use were estimated based on the mean number of patients per practice who were prescribed valproate and the proportion of physicians prescribing it. Covariables included gender, age, and physician. This cross-sectional study uses descriptive statistics only. RESULTS: In total, 1,298,446 patients were followed in general and neurological practices in 2009, 1,358,160 in 2013, and 1,413,286 in 2017. The mean number of patients aged 15-45â¯years per practice with at least one valproate prescription decreased in neurological (men: 11.07 versus 9.92; women: 9.27 versus 5.88) and general practices (men: 0.82 versus 0.75; women: 0.60 versus 0.37) between 2009 and 2017. Moreover, the proportion of neurologists prescribing valproate in women between 15 and 45â¯years of age decreased over time (94% in 2009 versus 86% in 2017), and there was also a substantial decrease in the share of general practitioners prescribing valproate in men (47% versus 41%) and women between 15 and 45â¯years of age (37% versus 22%). CONCLUSION: The proportion of men and women between 15 and 45â¯years of age receiving valproate decreased in neurological and general practices in Germany between 2009 and 2017.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Clínicos Gerais/tendências , Neurologistas/tendências , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Increasing pressure on general practice prompts innovative change in service organisation. This study sought to evaluate the impact of introducing a telephone-first consultation system in a socioeconomically deprived population. STUDY DESIGN: An interrupted time series of preplanned outcomes for 2 years before and 1 year postintroduction of a telephone-first system was used to measure the volume and type of general practitioner (GP) consultations and the number of patients consulted per year. Emergency department (ED) and GP out-of-hours attendances, the number of outpatient referrals, and the number of requests for laboratory tests were measured as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The telephone-first system was associated with a 20% increase in total GP consultations (telephone and face-to-face, effect estimate at 12 months, p=0.001). Face-to-face consultations decreased by 39% (p<0.001), while telephone consultations increased by 131% (p<0.001). The volume of individual patient requests for a GP consultation and the number of treatment room nurse consultations did not change. Secondary outcome measures showed no change in hospital outpatient referrals, number of requests for laboratory tests, and ED or GP out-of-hours attendances. CONCLUSIONS: A telephone-first system in a deprived urban general practice can decrease delays to GP-patient contacts. The number of patients seeking a medical intervention did not differ irrespective of the consultation system used. The telephone-first system did not affect GP out-of-hours, laboratory investigations or secondary care contacts.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Consulta Remota , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Inovação Organizacional , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in securing and coordinating appropriate use of healthcare services, by providing primary and preventive healthcare and by acting as gatekeepers for secondary healthcare services. Historically, European GPs have reported high job satisfaction, attributed to high autonomy and good compatibility with family life. However, a trend of increasing workload in general practice has been seen in several European countries, including Norway, leading to recruitment problems and concerns about the well-being of both GPs and patients. This qualitative interview study with GPs and their co-workers aims to explore how they perceive and tackle their workload, and their experiences and reflections regarding explanations for and consequences of increased workload in Norwegian general practice. METHODS: We conducted seven focus groups and four individual interviews with GPs and their co-workers in seven GPs' offices in Mid-Norway: three in rural locations and four in urban locations. Our study population consisted of 21 female and 12 male participants; 23 were GPs and 10 were co-workers. The interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: The analysis identified three main themes: (1) Heavy and increasing workload - more trend than fluctuation?; (2) Explanations for high workload; (3) Consequences of high workload. Our findings show that both GPs and their co-workers experience heavy and increasing workload. The suggested explanations varied considerably among the GPs, but the most commonly cited reasons were legislative changes, increased bureaucracy related to documentation and management of a practice, and changes in patients' expectations and help-seeking behaviour. Potential consequences were also perceived as varying, especially regarding consequences for patients and the healthcare system. The participants expressed concerns for the future, particularly in regards to GPs' health and motivation, as well as the recruitment of new GPs. CONCLUSIONS: This study found heavy and increasing workload in general practice in Norway. The explanations appear to be multi-faceted and many are difficult to reverse. The GPs expressed worries that they will not be able to provide the population with the expected care and services in the future.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/tendências , Clínicos Gerais , Carga de Trabalho , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Secretárias de Consultório Médico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Pesquisa Qualitativa , População Rural , População Urbana , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have specifically assessed the scope, nature and challenges of palliative and end-of-life care in rural general practice. These knowledge gaps limit the development of evidence-based policies and services for patients in the last months of life. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and other stakeholders on rural GPs' involvement and challenges in providing palliative and end-of-life care in regional Australia. METHODS: A qualitative study involving five focus groups with 26 GPs based in rural/regional Western Australia together with 15 individual telephone interviews with four GPs and 11 other stakeholders involved in end-of-life care across Australia. RESULTS: The rural GPs' central role in end-of-life care was recognized by the majority of participants but multiple challenges were also identified. Some challenges were comparable to those found in urban settings but others were more pronounced, including resource limitations and lack of training. Inappropriate payment models discouraged GPs' involvement in some aspects of end-of-life care, such as case conferences and home visits. Compared to GPs in urban settings, those in rural/regional communities often reported closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration. These positive aspects of care could be further developed to enhance service provision. Our study highlighted the importance of regular interactions with other professionals and patients in providing end-of-life care, but many GPs and other stakeholders found such interactions more challenging than the more "technical" aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS: Rural/regional GPs appear to be disproportionately affected by inappropriate payment models and limited resources, but may benefit from closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration relative to urban GPs. Systematic collection of empirical data on GP management at end-of-life is required to build on these strengths and address the challenges.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/tendências , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , População Rural , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Clínicos Gerais/tendências , Visita Domiciliar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Assistência Terminal/tendências , Austrália OcidentalRESUMO
In Germany there is a threat of a shortage of junior general practitioners (GPs). One third of currently employed GPs are 60 years and older. Every year, 1700â¯GPs leave the profession, while only about 1350 new GP-specialist approvals are issued. The Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care Sector estimates that there will be around 20,000 unmet replacement needs by 2025. By 2017, 2600 GP seats were already vacant.Based on the results of the KarMed study, this paper examines the questions as to how many residents intend to become general practitioners after graduation and how they develop during postgraduate training. Furthermore, the consequences of the increasing proportion of female physicians in primary care in terms of the possible volume of work will be investigated. Finally, measures that could reduce a possible personnel shortage are discussed.The attractiveness of general practice has increased considerably during residency over the last six years of observation. The preference for GP work is linked to parenthood. More female doctors strive for part-time work and an employment contract instead of a private practice. On this basis, it can be estimated that the volume of work performed by these female GPs will be half that of the traditional (male) working model in private practice.The forecasted numbers of new recruits are unlikely to be sufficient to cover the demand for GP care in Germany. Possible effective measures would be, for example, the introduction of a gatekeeper system, creation of multi-professional centers, a quota system for access to postgraduate training of specialists, a reformed national planning of GP supply in the country, and a shortening and flexibilization of postgraduate training for general practice.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Medicina Geral/tendências , Clínicos Gerais/provisão & distribuição , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Internato e Residência , Certificação , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Prática Privada , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
General practice, long considered the jewel in the crown of the English National Health Service, is being criticized for its small scale, isolation, and lack of accountability. There is growing concern that many general practices cannot respond to new expectations.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Especialização/tendências , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido , Estatísticas VitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Understanding the most common and costly conditions treated by inpatient general medical services is important for implementing quality improvement, developing health policy, conducting research, and designing medical education. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and cost of conditions treated on general internal medicine (GIM) inpatient services. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study involving 7 hospital sites in Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All patients discharged between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2015 who were admitted to or discharged from an inpatient GIM service. MAIN MEASURES: Hospital administrative data were used to identify diagnoses and costs associated with admissions. The primary discharge diagnosis was identified for each admission and categorized into clinically relevant and mutually exclusive categories using the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) tool. KEY RESULTS: Among 148,442 admissions, the most common primary discharge diagnoses were heart failure (5.1%), pneumonia (5.0%), urinary tract infection (4.6%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.5%), and stroke (4.4%). The prevalence of the 20 most common conditions was significantly correlated across hospitals (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). No single condition represented more than 5.1% of all admissions or more than 7.9% of admissions at any hospital site. The costliest conditions were stroke (median cost $7122, interquartile range 5587-12,354, total cost $94,199,422, representing 6.0% of all costs) and the group of delirium, dementia, and cognitive disorders (median cost $12,831, IQR 9539-17,509, total cost $77,372,541, representing 4.9% of all costs). The 10 most common conditions accounted for only 36.2% of hospitalizations and 36.8% of total costs. The remaining hospitalizations included 223 different CCS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: GIM services care for a markedly heterogeneous population but the most common conditions were similar across 7 hospitals. The diversity of conditions cared for in GIM may be challenging for healthcare delivery and quality improvement. Initiatives that cut across individual diseases to address processes of care, patient experience, and functional outcomes may be more relevant to a greater proportion of the GIM population than disease-specific efforts.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Medicina Interna/economia , Alta do Paciente/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Medicina Geral/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Medicina Interna/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Prevalência , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency presentations (EP) represent over a third of all lung cancer admissions in England. Such presentations usually reflect late stage disease and are associated with poor survival. General practitioners (GPs) act as gate-keepers to secondary care and so we sought to understand the association between GP practice characteristics and lung cancer EP. METHODS: Data on general practice characteristics were extracted for all practices in England from the Quality Outcomes Framework, the Health and Social Care Information Centre, the GP Patient Survey, the Cancer Commissioning Toolkit and the area deprivation score for each practice. After linking these data to lung cancer patient registrations in 2006-2013, we explored trends in three types of EP, patient-led, GP-led and 'other', by general practice characteristics and by socio-demographic characteristics of patients. RESULTS: Overall proportions of lung cancer EP decreased from 37.9% in 2006 to 34.3% in 2013. Proportions of GP-led EP nearly halved during this period, from 28.3 to 16.3%, whilst patient-led emergency presentations rose from 62.1 to 66.7%. When focusing on practice-specific levels of EP, 14% of general practices had higher than expected proportions of EP at least once in 2006-13, but there was no evidence of clustering of patients within practice, meaning that none of the practice characteristics examined explained differing proportions of EP by practice. CONCLUSION: We found that the high proportion of lung cancer EP is not the result of a few practices with very abnormal patterns of EP, but of a large number of practices susceptible to reaching high proportions of EP. This suggests a system-wide issue, rather than problems with specific practices. High proportions of lung cancer EP are mainly the result of patient-initiated attendances in A&E. Our results demonstrate that interventions to encourage patients not to bypass primary care must be system wide rather than targeted at specific practices.