Involvement of the Peripheral µ-Opioid Receptor in Tramadol-Induced Constipation in Rodents.

Tramadol is a weak opioid that produces analgesic effect via both the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) and non-opioid targets. Constipation is the most common opioid-related side effect in patients with cancer and non-cancer pain. However, the contribution of MOR to tramadol-induced constipation is unclear. Therefore, we used naldemedine, a peripherally acting MOR antagonist, and MOR-knockout mice to investigate the involvement of peripheral MOR in tramadol-induced constipation using a small intestinal transit model. A single dose of tramadol (3-100 mg/kg, per os (p.o.)) inhibited small intestinal transit dose-dependently in rats. Naldemedine (0.01-10 mg/kg, p.o.) blocked the inhibition of small intestinal transit induced by tramadol (30 mg/kg, p.o.) in rats. The transition rate increased dose-dependently over the range of naldemedine 0.01-0.3 mg/kg, and complete recovery was observed at 0.3-10 m/kg. Additionally, tramadol (30 and 100 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)) inhibited small intestinal transit in wild-type mice but not in MOR-knockout mice. These results suggest that peripheral MOR participates in tramadol-induced constipation.

Use of naltrexone in treating opioid use disorder in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of the management of opioid use disorder in pregnancy is with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. Methadone and buprenorphine are opioid agonist drugs. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, is also a medication-assisted treatment option; however, to date, only a few retrospective studies have reported its use in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: Our study objective was to evaluate prospectively obstetric and newborn outcomes and the maternal/fetal effects of the use of naltrexone as a medication-assisted treatment in pregnant patients with opioid use disorder. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study collecting data on all pregnant women who were treated with naltrexone medication-assisted treatment compared with pregnant women who were treated with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. Based on a sample size calculation, it was determined that for a power of 90, a minimum of 160 study participants (80 in each group) was needed with an alpha of .01 and an expected 60% rate of newborn infants who were treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome in the methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment group compared with a 30% rate in the naltrexone medication-assisted treatment group. In a random subset of 20 maternal/newborn dyads, blood levels for naltrexone and 6-beta-naltrexol (an active metabolite) were analyzed at delivery. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were studied: 121 patients with naltrexone medication-assisted treatment compared with 109 patients with methadone or buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment. No differences between groups were seen regarding demographics, the use of comedications/drugs, or obstetric outcomes. For newborn outcomes, the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome in neonates >34 weeks gestation was significantly lower in the naltrexone medication-assisted treatment group (10/119 [8.4%] vs 79/105 [75.2%]; P<.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the only significant factor for the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome was the form of medication-assisted treatment. Of 87 patients who received naltrexone up to delivery, no neonates experienced symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome. No maternal relapses occurred in the 7-day no-treatment window before the initiation of naltrexone therapy. No cases of spontaneous abortion or stillbirth occurred in either group. In 64 patients who started naltrexone therapy at ≥24 weeks gestation, no changes were seen in the fetal heart monitor tracing with drug initiation. The incidence of birth anomalies was no different between the groups. Umbilical cord blood and maternal levels for naltrexone and 6-beta-naltrexol matched; no levels were elevated, and values were undetected if naltrexone was discontinued >60 hours before delivery. CONCLUSION: These study data demonstrate that, in pregnant women who choose to completely detoxify off opioid drugs during gestation, naltrexone, as a continued form of medication-assisted treatment, is a viable option for some pregnant patients who experience opioid use disorder. Naltrexone crosses the placenta, and maternal and fetal levels are concordant. Because naltrexone clears quickly from the maternal circulation, this rapid clearance needs to be addressed with patients. This is important because maternal relapse could occur in a short time-period if the oral drug is discontinued without the knowledge of their healthcare providers. Nonetheless, the drug is well-tolerated by both mother and fetus, and newborn infants do not experience symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome if naltrexone medication-assisted treatment is maintained to delivery.

Fighting Fire with Fire: Development of Intranasal Nalmefene to Treat Synthetic Opioid Overdose.

The dramatic rise in overdose deaths linked to synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl, carfentanil) may require more potent, longer-duration opiate antagonists than naloxone. Both the high affinity of nalmefene at µ opiate receptors and its long half-life led us to examine the feasibility of developing an intranasal (IN) formulation as a rescue medication that could be especially useful in treating synthetic opioid overdose. In this study, the pharmacokinetic properties of IN nalmefene were compared with an intramuscular (i.m.) injection in a cohort of healthy volunteers. Nalmefene was absorbed slowly following IN administration, with a median time to reach Cmax (Tmax) of 2 hours. Addition of the absorption enhancer dodecyl maltoside (Intravail, Neurelis, Inc., Encinitas, CA) reduced Tmax to 0.25 hour and increased Cmax by ∼2.2-fold. The pharmacokinetic properties of IN nalmefene (3 mg) formulated with dodecyl maltoside has characteristics consistent with an effective rescue medication: its onset of action is comparable to an i.m. injection of nalmefene (1.5 mg) previously approved to treat opioid overdose. Furthermore, the Cmax following IN administration was ∼3-fold higher than following i.m. dosing, comparable to previously reported plasma concentrations of nalmefene observed 5 minutes following a 1-mg i.v. dose. The high affinity, very rapid onset, and long half-life (>7 hours) of IN nalmefene present distinct advantages as a rescue medication, particularly against longer-lived synthetic opioids.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Naloxone and Naltrexone Following Intranasal Administration to Healthy Subjects.

Naloxone (17-allyl-4,5α-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxymorphinan-6-one HCl), a µ-opioid receptor antagonist, is administered intranasally to reverse an opioid overdose but its short half-life may necessitate subsequent doses. The addition of naltrexone [17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5α-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxymorphinan-6-one], another µ-receptor antagonist, which has a reported half-life of 3 1/2 hours, may extend the available time to receive medical treatment. In a phase 1 pharmacokinetic study, healthy adults were administered naloxone and naltrexone intranasally, separately and in combination. When administered with naloxone, the C max value of naltrexone decreased 62% and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) decreased 38% compared with when it was given separately; lower concentrations of naltrexone were observed as early as 5 minutes postdose. In contrast, the C max and AUC0-inf values of naloxone decreased only 18% and 16%, respectively, when given with naltrexone. This apparent interaction was investigated further to determine if naloxone and naltrexone shared a transporter. Neither compound was a substrate for organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, OCT3, OCTN1, or OCTN2. There was no evidence of the involvement of a transmembrane transporter when they were tested separately or in combination at concentrations of 10 and 500 µM using Madin-Darby canine kidney II cell monolayers at pH 7.4. The efflux ratios of naloxone and naltrexone increased to six or greater when the apical solution was pH 5.5, the approximate pH of the nasal cavity; there was no apparent interaction when the two were coincubated. The importance of understanding how opioid antagonists are absorbed by the nasal epithelium is magnified by the rise in overdose deaths attributed to long-lived synthetic opioids and the realization that better strategies are needed to treat opioid overdoses.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Naltrexone and 6ß-Naltrexol During Anti-craving Treatment in Alcohol Dependence: Reference Ranges.

AIMS: Aim of this study was to associate concentration of naltrexone and its major active metabolite 6ß-naltrexol in blood with therapeutic outcome during treatment with naltrexone in subjects with alcohol dependence. Treatment with the µ-opiate receptor antagonist naltrexone has been shown to reduce craving for alcohol and alcohol intake in patients suffering from alcohol dependence. SHORT SUMMARY: This article shows the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in alcohol dependent patients, who are treated with naltrexone. The plasma concentrations of naltrexone and 6ß-naltrexol showed high inter-individual variability. They were predictive for treatment response, as they correlated significantly with the reduction of alcohol craving. METHODS: Naltrexone and 6ß-naltrexol were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography with column switching and spectrophotometric detection. Alcohol craving was assessed with the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study included 43 patients who were treated with naltrexone with a dose of 50 mg/day. Blood was taken for drug analysis 8 h after the last dose of the day at Week 4, 8 and 12. The plasma concentrations of naltrexone and 6ß-naltrexol showed high inter-individual variability. They were predictive for treatment response, as they correlated significantly with the reduction of alcohol craving. Defining patients with OCDS reduction of 70% or higher as responders, the mean±SD concentration of naltrexone plus naltrexol was 22 ± 13 ng/ml compared to 15 ± 8 ng/ml in patients with score reductions of 1-69%. Further analyses indicated that concentrations of 17-50 ng/ml at 8 h and 7-20 ng/ml at 24 h after drug intake were required for treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Since plasma concentration of naltrexone plus 6ß-naltrexol was found to be predictive for reduction of alcohol craving, it is concluded that therapeutic drug monitoring has the potential to enhance naltrexone's moderate therapeutic efficiency in patients with alcohol dependence.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of radiolabeled naldemedine in healthy subjects.

1. Naldemedine is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. 2. This phase 1 study investigated the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of naldemedine, following a single oral 2-mg dose of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine or [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine to 12 healthy adult male subjects. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed on blood, urine and fecal samples collected at defined intervals. 3. Naldemedine was the major circulating component in plasma with a median Tmax of approximately 0.8-0.9 h and a geometric mean t1/2,z of approximately 11 h. Total systemic exposures, AUC, of metabolites nor-naldemedine were less abundant than those of naldemedine (9% or 13% of AUC of naldemedine) and 16.2% or 18.1% of naldemedine was excreted as unchanged in urine after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine or [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine, respectively, and benzamidine was the major radioactive component after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine (32.5% of administered dose). Overall, the recovery of total radioactivity was 92% (57.3% in urine; 34.8% in feces) after administration of [oxadiazole-14C]-naldemedine and 85% (20.4% in urine; 64.3% in feces) after administration of [carbonyl-14C]-naldemedine. 4. Our findings suggest that naldemedine is mainly metabolized to nor-naldemedine. Naldemedine was rapidly absorbed and well tolerated, with no major safety signals observed.

Population pharmacokinetics of nalmefene in healthy subjects and its relation to µ-opioid receptor occupancy.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to describe the PK of nalmefene in healthy subjects and to relate the exposure of nalmefene to the µ-opioid receptor occupancy by simulations in the target population. METHODS: Data from nine phase I studies (243 subjects) with extensive blood sampling were pooled and used for the population PK model building. Data from four other phase I studies (85 subjects) were pooled and used as an external validation dataset. Eight subjects from an imaging study contributed occupancy data and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship was modelled. Combining the population PK model and the PK/PD relationship enabled simulations to predict µ-opioid occupancy. RESULTS: A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the nalmefene PK data. The typical subject in the population was estimated to have a systemic clearance of 60.4 l h(-1) and a central volume of distribution of 266 l. Absolute oral bioavailability was estimated to 41% without food intake and with food about 53%. Simulation of the µ-opioid receptor occupancy shows that the 95% confidence bound is within or above 60-90% occupancy for up to 22-24 h after a single dose of 20 mg nalmefene. CONCLUSIONS: A robust population PK model for nalmefene was developed. Based on the concentration-occupancy model the µ-opioid receptor occupancy after a single 20 mg dose of nalmefene is predicted to be above the target therapeutic occupancy for about 24 h in about 95% of the target population.

Intravenous abuse potential study of oxycodone alone or in combination with naltrexone in nondependent recreational opioid users.

BACKGROUND: ALO-02, comprising pellets of extended-release oxycodone surrounding sequestered naltrexone, is intended to deter abuse. OBJECTIVE: Determine the abuse potential of intravenous oxycodone combined with naltrexone, which represents simulated crushed ALO-02 in solution, compared with intravenous oxycodone in nondependent, recreational opioid users. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study with naloxone challenge, drug discrimination, and treatment phases. Intravenous treatments included oxycodone hydrochloride 20 mg, oxycodone hydrochloride 20 mg plus naltrexone hydrochloride 2.4 mg (simulated crushed ALO-02 20 mg/2.4 mg), or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride for injection). Primary end points were peak effects (Emax) and area under the effects curve within 2 h postdose (AUE0-2h) on drug liking and high visual analog scales. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants were randomized into treatment phase, and 29 completed all treatments. Study validity was confirmed with statistically significant differences in Emax for drug liking and high (p < 0.0001) between intravenous oxycodone and placebo. Intravenous simulated crushed ALO-02 resulted in significantly lower scores than oxycodone on drug liking (Emax: 58.2 vs. 92.4; AUE0-2h: 104.3 vs. 152.4) and high (Emax: 17.2 vs. 93.1; AUE0-2h: 12.0 vs. 133.6), respectively (p < 0.0001, all comparisons). More participants experienced adverse events after intravenous oxycodone (n = 27 [90%]) versus intravenous simulated crushed ALO-02 (n = 4 [12.5%]) or placebo (n = 2 [6.5%]). CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of simulated crushed ALO-02 resulted in significantly lower abuse potential, as assessed by subjective ratings of drug liking and high, than intravenous oxycodone in nondependent, recreational opioid users. This suggests that injection of ALO-02 may not be as desirable to recreational opioid users compared with oxycodone taken for nonmedical reasons.

Evidence that Melanocortin Receptor Agonist Melanotan-II Synergistically Augments the Ability of Naltrexone to Blunt Binge-Like Ethanol Intake in Male C57BL/6J Mice.

BACKGROUND: The nonselective opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone (NAL), reduces alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) consumption in animals and humans and is an approved medication for treating alcohol abuse disorders. Proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-derived melanocortin (MC) and opioid peptides are produced in the same neurons in the brain, and recent preclinical evidence shows that MC receptor (MCR) agonists reduce excessive EtOH drinking in animal models. Interestingly, there is a growing body of literature revealing interactions between the MC and the opioid systems in the modulation of pain, drug tolerance, and food intake. METHODS: In the present report, a mouse model of binge EtOH drinking was employed to determine whether the MCR agonist, melanotan-II (MTII), would improve the effectiveness of NAL in reducing excessive binge-like EtOH drinking when these drugs were co-administered prior to EtOH access. RESULTS: Both NAL and MTII blunt binge-like EtOH drinking and associated blood EtOH levels, and when administered together, a low dose of MTII (0.26 mg/kg) produces a 7.6-fold increase in the effectiveness of NAL in reducing binge-like EtOH drinking. Using isobolographic analysis, it is demonstrated that MTII increases the effectiveness of NAL in a synergistic manner. CONCLUSIONS: The current observations suggest that activators of MC signaling may represent a new approach to treating alcohol abuse disorders and a way to potentially improve existing NAL-based therapies.

Phase I study of injectable, depot naltrexone for the relapse prevention treatment of opioid dependence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We tested long-acting injectable depot naltrexone for its tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and safety in Phase I. METHODS: The Phase I trial enrolled 36 healthy participants in two panels (A, B). In Panel A, 24 subjects were randomly assigned to the high-dosage group (400 mg naltrexone, n=6; placebo, n=6) or low-dosage group (200 mg naltrexone, n=6; placebo, n=6). In Panel B, 12 subjects were randomized to take six doses of monthly injectable naltrexone (400 mg) or placebo. RESULTS: After a single injection of naltrexone 200 and 400 mg, means (SD) of naltrexone plasma concentrations were .57 (.28) ng/ml and 1.5 (.8) ng/ml 30 days post-injection. There was no effect of accumulation after multiple dosing. Eleven of 30 subjects (36.67%) who were administered injectable depot naltrexone reported a total of 12 adverse events (AEs). Seven of these 11 AEs were coded as possibly related with study medication. All treatment-related AEs were mild in severity. No serious treatment-related AEs occurred. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This long-acting formulation of injectable depot naltrexone is well tolerated, results in constant plasma concentration of naltrexone for at least 1 month. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The tolerability and safety of long-acting injectable depot naltrexone are good.

Simultaneous Determination of Levo-tetrahydropalmatine and Naltrexone in Rat Plasma by LC-MS/MS and its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study.

BACKGROUND: Levo-tetrahydropalmatine and low-dose naltrexone are used in association with reducing cocaine-related cravings, but there are no analytical methods for the quantitative simultaneous analysis of this drug combination. OBJECTIVE: A highly selective and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated to simultaneously quantify l-THP and naltrexone. The analytical method for l-THP offers improved sensitivity compared to previously published methods. METHODS: The product ion transitions of l-THP and naltrexone were 357.0→193.0 and 342.2→324.1, respectively. Chromatographic separations were performed using a BEH-C18 column by an isocratic elution mode with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water containing 3 mM ammonium acetate. L-THP and naltrexone were extracted from rat plasma using a liquidliquid extraction method. RESULTS: For l-THP and naltrexone, the assay displayed good linear response over a concentration range of 0.5-1000 ng/mL and 0.25-500 ng/mL, respectively. The intra-day accuracy of the method for l-THP and naltrexone was 93.8-101% with a precision (%CV) of 2.43-8.15% and 93.4-108% with a precision of 3.47-8.22%. The inter-day accuracy for l-THP and naltrexone was 91.2-102% with a CV of 2.46-8.06% and 91.5-97.8% with a CV of 3.29-8.92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The assay has been used for pharmacokinetic studies of l-THP and naltrexone in the rat.

Diclofenac enables unprecedented week-long microneedle-enhanced delivery of a skin impermeable medication in humans.

PURPOSE: Microneedles applied to the skin create micropores, allowing transdermal drug delivery of skin-impermeable compounds. The first human study with this technique demonstrated delivery of naltrexone (an opioid antagonist) for two to three days. Rapid micropore closure, however, blunts the delivery window. Application of diclofenac (an anti-inflammatory) allows seven days of naltrexone delivery in animals. The purpose of the current work was to demonstrate delivery of naltrexone for seven days following one microneedle treatment in humans. METHODS: Human subjects were treated with microneedles, diclofenac (or placebo), and naltrexone. Impedance measurements were used as a surrogate marker to measure micropore formation, and plasma naltrexone concentrations were measured for seven days post-microneedle application. RESULTS: Impedance dropped significantly from baseline to post-microneedle treatment, confirming micropore formation. Naltrexone was detected for seven days in Group 1 (diclofenac + naltrexone, n = 6), vs. 72 h in Group 2 (placebo + naltrexone, n = 2). At study completion, a significant difference in impedance was observed between intact and microneedle-treated skin in Group 1 (confirming the presence of micropores). CONCLUSION: This is the first study demonstrating week-long drug delivery after one microneedle application, which would increase patient compliance and allow delivery of therapies for chronic diseases.

Assessment of pharmacodynamic effects following oral administration of crushed morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride extended-release capsules compared with crushed morphine sulfate controlled-release tablets and placebo in nondependent recreational opioid users.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacodynamic effects, including self-reports of "drug liking" and "high," of crushed morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride extended-release capsules (MSN), crushed morphine sulfate controlled-release (CR) tablets, and placebo in an abuse potential study. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study. SETTING: Single-center. SUBJECTS: Nondependent recreational opioid users. INTERVENTIONS: Orally administered crushed MSN (120-mg morphine sulfate and 4.8-mg naltrexone hydrochloride), crushed 120-mg morphine sulfate CR, and placebo. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective ratings (100-point visual analog scales) of positive drug effects (drug liking, high, good effects, take drug again, and overall drug liking), any effects, and negative effects (bad effects, feel sick, nausea, sleepy, and dizzy), along with pupillometry, pharmacokinetic (PK), and safety assessments. RESULTS: Crushed morphine sulfate CR significantly increased ratings of all positive subjective measures relative to placebo (P < 0.0001). Crushed MSN significantly decreased all positive subjective ratings compared with morphine sulfate CR (P ≤ 0.005), but significantly increased ratings compared with placebo (P < 0.03). Peak pupil diameter was significantly larger for MSN than morphine sulfate (P < 0.0001). PK analysis of morphine plasma concentrations indicated that Cmax was significantly lower and tmax significantly longer for crushed MSN compared with crushed morphine sulfate CR. Plasma concentrations of naltrexone and 6-ß-naltrexol were present following crushed MSN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that when crushed and administered orally to nondependent recreational opioid users, MSN was associated with significantly lower scores on all positive subjective measures including drug liking and high, and significantly less pupil constriction compared with crushed morphine sulfate CR.

Pharmacological differentiation of opioid receptor antagonists by molecular and functional imaging of target occupancy and food reward-related brain activation in humans.

Opioid neurotransmission has a key role in mediating reward-related behaviours. Opioid receptor (OR) antagonists, such as naltrexone (NTX), can attenuate the behaviour-reinforcing effects of primary (food) and secondary rewards. GSK1521498 is a novel OR ligand, which behaves as an inverse agonist at the µ-OR sub-type. In a sample of healthy volunteers, we used [(11)C]-carfentanil positron emission tomography to measure the OR occupancy and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure activation of brain reward centres by palatable food stimuli before and after single oral doses of GSK1521498 (range, 0.4-100 mg) or NTX (range, 2-50 mg). GSK1521498 had high affinity for human brain ORs (GSK1521498 effective concentration 50 = 7.10 ng ml(-1)) and there was a direct relationship between receptor occupancy (RO) and plasma concentrations of GSK1521498. However, for both NTX and its principal active metabolite in humans, 6-ß-NTX, this relationship was indirect. GSK1521498, but not NTX, significantly attenuated the fMRI activation of the amygdala by a palatable food stimulus. We thus have shown how the pharmacological properties of OR antagonists can be characterised directly in humans by a novel integration of molecular and functional neuroimaging techniques. GSK1521498 was differentiated from NTX in terms of its pharmacokinetics, target affinity, plasma concentration-RO relationships and pharmacodynamic effects on food reward processing in the brain. Pharmacological differentiation of these molecules suggests that they may have different therapeutic profiles for treatment of overeating and other disorders of compulsive consumption.

Long-acting κ opioid antagonists nor-BNI, GNTI and JDTic: pharmacokinetics in mice and lipophilicity.

BACKGROUND: Nor-BNI, GNTI and JDTic induce κ opioid antagonism that is delayed by hours and can persist for months. Other effects are transient. It has been proposed that these drugs may be slowly absorbed or distributed, and may dissolve in cell membranes, thus slowing elimination and prolonging their effects. Recent evidence suggests, instead, that they induce prolonged desensitization of the κ opioid receptor. METHODS: To evaluate these hypotheses, we measured relevant physicochemical properties of nor-BNI, GNTI and JDTic, and the timecourse of brain and plasma concentrations in mice after intraperitoneal administration (using LC-MS-MS). RESULTS: In each case, plasma levels were maximal within 30 min and declined by >80% within four hours, correlating well with previously reported transient effects. A strong negative correlation was observed between plasma levels and the delayed, prolonged timecourse of κ antagonism. Brain levels of nor-BNI and JDTic peaked within 30 min, but while nor-BNI was largely eliminated within hours, JDTic declined gradually over a week. Brain uptake of GNTI was too low to measure accurately, and higher doses proved lethal. None of the drugs were highly lipophilic, showing high water solubility (> 45 mM) and low distribution into octanol (log D7.4 < 2). Brain homogenate binding was within the range of many shorter-acting drugs (>7% unbound). JDTic showed P-gp-mediated efflux; nor- BNI and GNTI did not, but their low unbound brain uptake suggests efflux by another mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: The negative plasma concentration-effect relationship we observed is difficult to reconcile with simple competitive antagonism, but is consistent with desensitization. The very slow elimination of JDTic from brain is surprising given that it undergoes active efflux, has modest affinity for homogenate, and has a shorter duration of action than nor-BNI under these conditions. We propose that this persistence may result from entrapment in cellular compartments such as lysosomes.

Determination of naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol in human blood: comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric and tandem-mass-spectrometric detection.

We present data for a comparison of a liquid-chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a high-performance liquid-chromatographic method with column switching and UV spectrophotometric detection. The two methods were developed for determination of naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol in blood serum or plasma aiming to be used for therapeutic drug monitoring to guide the treatment of patients with naltrexone. For the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/UV detection, online sample cleanup was conducted on Perfect Bond C(18) material with 2% (vol/vol) acetonitrile in deionized water. Drugs were separated on a C(18) column using 11.5% (vol/vol) acetonitrile and 0.4% (vol/vol) N,N,N,N-tetramethylethylenediamine within 20 min. LC-MS/MS used naltrexone-d (3) and 6beta-naltrexol-d (4) as internal standards. After protein precipitation, the chromatographic separation was performed on a C(18) column by applying a methanol gradient (5-100%, vol/vol) with 0.1% formic acid over 9.5 min. The HPLC/UV method was found to be linear for concentrations ranging from 2 to 100 ng/ml, with a regression correlation coefficient of r (2) > 0.998 for naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol. The limit of quantification was 2 ng/ml for naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol. For the LC-MS/MS method the calibration curves were linear (r(2) > 0.999) from 0.5 to 200 ng/ml for both substances, and the limit of quantification was 0.5 ng/ml. The concentrations measured by the two methods correlated significantly for both substances (r(2) > 0.967; p < 0.001). Both methods could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring. The HPLC/UV method was advantageous regarding automatization and costs, whereas LC-MS/MS was superior with regard to sensitivity.

Bioresponsive nanostructured systems for sustained naltrexone release and treatment of alcohol use disorder: Development and biological evaluation.

In this study, microemulsions capable of transforming into nanostructured hexagonal phase gels in vivo upon uptake of biological fluids for naltrexone prolonged release were investigated as a strategy for management of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Microemulsions were prepared using monoolein, tricaprylin, water and propylene glycol; after preliminary characterization, one formulation was selected, which contained 55% of monoolein-tricaprylin (M-55). This microemulsion displayed size below 200 nm and Newtonian rheological behavior. Liquid crystalline gels formed in vitro upon 8 h of contact with water following a second order kinetics. After 120 h, <50% of naltrexone was released in vitro independently on drug loading (5 or 10%). In vivo, gels formed within 24 h of M-55 subcutaneous administration, and persisted locally for over 30 days providing slow release of the fluorescent marker Alexa fluor compared to a solution. Using the conditioned place preference paradigm, a test used to measure drug's rewarding effects, a single dose of M-55 containing 5% naltrexone reduced the time spent in the ethanol-paired compartment by 1.8-fold compared to saline; this effect was similar to that obtained with daily naltrexone injections, demonstrating the formulation efficacy and its ability to reduce dosing frequency. A more robust effect was observed following administration of M-55 containing 10% of naltrexone, which was compatible with aversion. These results support M-55 as a platform for sustained release of drugs that can be further explored for management of AUD to reduce dosing frequency and aid treatment adherence.

Naltrexone implants after in-patient treatment for opioid dependence: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Naltrexone has considerable potential in helping to prevent relapse in heroin dependency. A longer-lasting formulation for naltrexone treatment is desirable to further reduce non-adherence and relapse during treatment of opiate dependence. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a 6-month naltrexone implant in reducing opioid use after in-patient treatment. METHOD: A group of 56 abstinence-oriented patients who completed in-patient treatment for opioid dependence were randomly and openly assigned to receive either a 6-month naltrexone implant or their usual aftercare. Drug use and other outcomes were assessed at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Patients receiving naltrexone had on average 45 days less heroin use and 60 days less opioid use than controls in the 180-day period (both P<0.05). Blood tests showed naltrexone levels above 1 ng/ml for the duration of 6 months. Two patients died, neither of whom had received an implant. CONCLUSIONS: Naltrexone implant treatment safely and significantly reduces opioid use in a motivated population of patients.

Circumstances of death of opioid users being treated with naltrexone.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist used as a maintenance drug for the treatment of opioid dependence and in opioid withdrawal regimens. The current study aimed to: (1) determine the clinical characteristics and circumstances of death of people undergoing naltrexone treatment for opioid dependence; and (2) determine the blood toxicology of cases including naltrexone concentrations, the presence of other drugs and a comparison of morphine concentrations in the presence and absence of naltrexone. DESIGN: Retrospective study of all deaths among people undergoing naltrexone treatment for opioid dependence retrieved from the National Coronial Information System, 2000-17. SETTING: Australia-wide. CASES: Seventy-four cases, with a mean age of 32.5 years; 81.1% male. MEASUREMENTS: Information was collected on demographics, manner of death, naltrexone treatment history, toxicology and major organ pathology. FINDINGS: Death was attributed to opioid toxicity in 86.5% of cases: accidental (79.7%), deliberate (6.8%). In 55.4% of all cases the decedent was maintained on oral naltrexone and 32.4% had a recent naltrexone implant. In five cases the decedent was undergoing opioid detoxification. Among those screened for naltrexone, naltrexone was present in the blood or urine of 52.5% (15.8% of oral maintenance cases, 85.7% of implant cases). Fourteen cases were known to have died from opioid toxicity with naltrexone present in their blood or urine. The median blood naltrexone concentrations were within the reported therapeutic range. CONCLUSIONS: The primary cause of death among people undergoing naltrexone treatment for opioid dependence in Australia from 2000 to 2017 was opioid toxicity, the majority of cases having been maintained on oral naltrexone. Cases in which naltrexone was not detected indicate the importance of treatment compliance. Deaths due to opioid toxicity where naltrexone was present indicates the possibility of overdose while naltrexone medication is maintained.