Effect of cyclic loading on the vertical microgap of long-span zirconia frameworks supported by 4 or 6 implants.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Few studies have investigated the microgap of long-span complete-arch fixed dental prosthesis zirconia frameworks. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading on the vertical microgap of maxillary 12-unit prostheses supported by 4 implants and on 14-unit prostheses supported by 6 implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-piece zirconia frameworks were fabricated with a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and divided into 2 groups (n=5): a group of 12-unit prostheses and a group of 14-unit prostheses. The vertical microgap between the frameworks and prosthetic abutments was measured with an optical microscope (80×) under 2 reading conditions. Condition 1 (1-screw test): 1A, the screw on implant 1 was tightened and readings were made on all implants; 1B, the screw was changed to implant 4 (implant 6 for the 14-unit group) and readings were made on all implants. Condition 2: the microgap was measured with all screws tightened before cyclic loading (2A). Specimens were submitted to 200 N underwater (37°C) cyclic loading at a 2-Hz frequency for 1×10(6) cycles. Microgap reading condition 2 was repeated after cyclic loading (2B). The data were submitted to a linear mixed-effects model for statistical comparison (α=.05). RESULTS: A lower (P<.05) vertical microgap (µm) was found for the 12-unit group (reading conditions: 1A, 47.93; 1B, 43.83; 2A, 11.77; and 2B, 11.25) compared to the 14-unit group (1A, 94.87; 1B, 112.56; 2A, 21.28; and 2B, 16.90). No differences were found when each group was compared before and after cyclic loading (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The vertical microgap was significantly reduced after tightening all the screws in the framework, possibly leading to a nonpassive situation. Longer-span frameworks showed an increased microgap. Cyclic loading had no influence on the vertical microgap within each group.

A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection.

With an increase in the availability of implant restorative components, the selection of an appropriate implant abutment for a given clinical situation has become more challenging. This article describes a classification system that will help the practitioner understand the different implant abutments available and therefore be able to understand the selection of abutments for single and multiple unit fixed implant prosthesis.