Randomized trial of anakinra plus zinc vs. prednisone for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) is associated with high 90-day mortality. Glucocorticoid therapy for 28 days improves 30- but not 90-day survival. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination of anakinra, an IL-1 antagonist, plus zinc (A+Z) compared to prednisone using the Day-7 Lille score as a stopping rule in patients with SAH. METHODS: In this phase IIb double-blind randomized trial in adults with SAH and MELD scores of 20-35, participants were randomized to receive either daily anakinra 100 mg subcutaneously for 14 days plus daily zinc sulfate 220 mg orally for 90 days, or daily prednisone 40 mg orally for 30 days. Prednisone or prednisone placebo was stopped if Day-7 Lille score was >0.45. All study drugs were stopped for uncontrolled infection or ≥5 point increase in MELD score. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 90 days. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants were randomized to prednisone and 74 to A+Z. The trial was stopped early after a prespecified interim analysis showed prednisone was associated with higher 90-day overall survival (90% vs. 70%; hazard ratio for death = 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.83, p = 0.018) and transplant-free survival (88% vs. 64%; hazard ratio for transplant or death = 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.69, p = 0.004) than A+Z. Acute kidney injury was more frequent with A+Z (45%) than prednisone (22%) (p = 0.001), but rates of infection were similar (31% in A+Z vs. 27% in prednisone, p = 0.389). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with SAH treated with prednisone using the Day-7 Lille score as a stopping rule had significantly higher overall and transplant-free 90-day survival and lower incidence of acute kidney injury than those treated with A+Z. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: There is no approved treatment for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH). In this double-blind randomized trial, patients with SAH treated with prednisone using the Lille stopping rule on Day 7 had higher 90-day overall and transplant-free survival and lower rates of acute kidney injury compared to patients treated with a combination of anakinra and zinc. The data support continued use of glucocorticoids for patients with SAH, with treatment discontinuation for those with a Lille score >0.45 on Day 7. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04072822.

Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-1 treatment in familial Mediterranean fever patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: FMF is the most common hereditary monogenic fever syndrome marked by recurrent attacks of fever and polyserositis. Colchicine is the current recommended first-line treatment for FMF. However, a small portion of FMF patients are unresponsive or intolerant to colchicine. Anti-IL-1 agents are alternative treatment options for colchicine-resistant or -intolerant FMF patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide qualitative and quantitative evidence for the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-1 agents in adult and paediatric FMF patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science were screened from inception to May 2023. We included adult and paediatric FMF patients who received continuous treatment with at least one of the anti-IL-1 drugs: anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission of attacks and the primary safety outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced at least one adverse event during treatment. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the quantitative synthesis. RESULTS: Fourty-four reports consisting of 1399 FMF patients were included. Sixty percent (95% CI 49%, 72%) of the adult patients and 81% (95% CI 72%, 89%) of the paediatric patients achieved complete remission. Anti-IL-1 agents significantly decreased levels of inflammatory markers. At least one adverse event was observed in 25% (95% CI 13%, 37%) of the adult patients and 12% (95% CI 3%, 21%) of the paediatric patients. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-1 agents were effective and demonstrated a low adverse event profile in paediatric and adult FMF patients.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with biological agents in Turkey: the TURSIS study.

OBJECTIVES: Biological drugs are one of the most effective treatment methods for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) and can significantly prevent morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with SJIA and provide real-life data that might help improve the outcomes. METHODS: TURSIS was a retrospective multicentre study carried out in patients with SJIA for whom a biological treatment had been initiated between 1st March 2013 and 30th December 2018. Data include patients' characteristics, laboratory-clinical results, outcomes, and safety-related variables. The 24-month follow-up data of the patients and the efficacy and safety of biological drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: 147 patients were enrolled. The clinical course of the disease was as follows; it was monocyclic in 38.1%, polycyclic in 49%, and persistent in 12.9% of patients. First-choice biologics were interleukin (IL)-1 blockers in the majority of patients (56.5%), followed by the anti-IL-6 (25.2%) and anti-TNF-alpha drugs (18.4%). Anakinra was the most preferred biologic agent in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and tocilizumab was used more frequently in patients with persistent type (p=0.000 and p=0.003). The most frequent switch rate was seen in patients receiving anakinra (n=40/68, 58.8%), and it was most frequently switched to canakinumab (n=32/40, 80%). Better physician's global assessment scores were achieved in patients treated with anakinra in Month 3, compared to other treatments (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study support the efficacy of biological drugs in particular anti-IL-1 and anti-IL-6 drugs, in the treatment of SJIA. These treatments resulted in improvement in activity of disease and provide a considerable decrease in the frequency of MAS.

Comparison of Safety and Biological Efficacy of Anakinra (Kineret) Dispensed in Polycarbonate Plastic versus Borosilicate Glass Syringes: A Patient-Level Analysis of VCUART2 and VCUART3 Clinical Trials.

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Kineret is available as a solution prepared in a borosilicate glass syringe. For implementing a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial, anakinra is commonly transferred into plastic syringes. However, there is limited data on anakinra's stability in polycarbonate syringes. We described the results of our previous studies on the use of anakinra in glass (VCUART3) versus plastic syringes (VCUART2) compared with placebo. These studies were conducted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and we assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of anakinra versus placebo by comparing the area under the curve for high-sensitivity cardiac reactive protein (AUC-CRP) levels during the first 14 days of STEMI, its clinical effects on heart failure (HF) hospitalization, cardiovascular death, or new diagnosis of HF as well as adverse events profile between groups. The levels of AUC-CRP were 75 (50-255 mg·day/l) for anakinra in plastic syringes versus 255 (116-592 mg·day/l) in placebo and 60 (24-139 mg·day/l) and 86 (43-123 mg·day/l) for anakinra once and twice daily in glass syringes, respectively, compared with placebo 214 (131-394 mg·day/l). The rate of adverse events was also comparable between groups. There were no differences in the rate of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients who received anakinra in plastic or glass syringes. Fewer cases of new-onset heart failure occurred in patients receiving anakinra in plastic or glass syringes compared with placebo. Anakinra stored in plastic (polycarbonate) syringes provides comparable biologic and clinical effect to glass (borosilicate) syringes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anakinra (Kineret) 100 mg administered subcutaneously in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for a duration of up to 14 days appears to have comparable safety and biological efficacy signals when delivered in prefilled glass or transferred into plastic polycarbonate syringes. This may have important implications for the feasibility of designing clinical trials in STEMI and other clinical conditions.

IL-1ß Derived Th17 Immune Responses Are a Critical Factor for Neutrophilic-Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation on Psychological Stress-Induced Immune Tolerance Breakdown in Mice.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is an inflammatory reaction mediated by type 2 helper T (Th2) cells and is known to increase eosinophil levels. Our previous study showed that stress-related asthma can cause neutrophilic and eosinophilic airway inflammation by suppressing immune tolerance. However, the mechanism of stress-induced neutrophilic and eosinophilic airway inflammation remains unclear. Therefore, to elucidate the cause of neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, we investigated the immune response during the induction of airway inflammation. In addition, we focused on the relationship between immune response modulation immediately after stress exposure and the development of airway inflammation. METHODS: Asthmatic mice were induced by three phases using female BALB/c mice. During the first phase, the mice were made to inhale ovalbumin (OVA) to induce immune tolerance before sensitization. Some mice were exposed to restraint stress during the induction of immune tolerance. In the second phase, the mice were sensitized with OVA/alum intraperitoneal injections. In the final phase, onset of asthma was induced through OVA exposure. Asthma development was evaluated based on airway inflammation and T-cell differentiation. Microarray and qPCR analyses were used to enumerate candidate factors to investigate the starting point of immunological modification immediately after stress exposure. Furthermore, we focused on interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), which initiates these immune modifications, and performed experiments using its receptor blocker interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA). RESULTS: Stress exposure during immune tolerance induction increased eosinophil and neutrophil airway infiltration. This inflammation was associated with decreased T regulatory cell levels and increased Th2 and Th17 levels in bronchial lymph node cells. Microarray and qPCR analyses showed that the initiation of Th17 differentiation might be triggered by stress exposure during tolerance induction. IL-1RA administration during stress exposure suppressed neutrophilic and eosinophilic airway inflammation via Th17 reduction and Treg increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that psychological stress causes both eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammatory responses due to the breakdown of immune tolerance. Furthermore, stress-induced inflammation can be abolished using IL-1RA.

Anakinra versus etoposide-based therapy added to high-dose steroids for the treatment of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

OBJECTIVE: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare life-threatening, hyperinflammatory syndrome usually treated with high-dose steroids (HDS), often complemented with adjunct therapies, such as etoposide (HLH-94 protocol). Anakinra has been reported to effectively treat HLH; however, has not been comparatively examined with etoposide-based therapies. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and durability of these treatment approaches. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with secondary HLH between January 2011 and November 2022 who received anakinra and HDS, the HLH-94 protocol, HDS alone, or supportive care. RESULTS: Thirty adult patients with secondary HLH were included. Cumulative incidence (CI) of response at 30 days was 83.3%, 60%, and 36.4% for patients treated with anakinra, the HLH-94 protocol, and HDS alone, respectively. CI of relapse at 1 year was 50%, 33.3%, and 0% with the HLH-94 protocol, HDS, and anakinra and HDS, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year was higher with anakinra and HDS compared to the HLH-94 protocol, yet was not statistically significant (77.8% vs. 33.3%; hazard ratio: 0.29; p = .25). CONCLUSION: Treatment with anakinra and HDS in adults with secondary HLH was associated with higher response rates with longer survival compared with alternative therapies and should be further investigated in this setting.

Intravenous anakinra for the treatment of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) has a potentially high mortality rate. Anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, is now recommended early in HLH/MAS, with intravenous (IV) use proposed in critically unwell patients. This systematic review establishes the literature relating to IV anakinra in secondary HLH/MAS (sHLH/MAS). METHODS: We screened Embase, PubMed, and Medline, including all reports of IV anakinra for HLH or MAS. We extracted age, HLH/MAS trigger, continuous infusion or bolus dosing, and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-nine case reports/series identified 87 patients (median age 22 years, range 22 months to 84 years), all with sHLH. Amongst identifiable triggers, 43% were systemic infection, 33% rheumatological, 9% oncological. Children had predominantly a rheumatological trigger (48%), whilst adults were more commonly infection-driven (50%). Overall, rheumatologically triggered disease showed greater survival (83.3%), particularly compared with oncological triggers (42.9%). Children had a greater survival, particularly under 10 years (83%, vs. adults, 63%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite IV anakinra recipients likely to be critically unwell, this cohort had similar disease triggers and survival compared to large historical cohorts, and enhances awareness of age and trigger-specific survival patterns. IV anakinra had a wide therapeutic dosing range and tolerability, regardless of trigger, demonstrating substantial utility in severe sHLH/MAS.

Efficacy and secondary infection risk of tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

As the pandemic progresses, the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is becoming clearer and the potential for immunotherapy is increasing. However, clinical efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants (including tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra) treatment in COVID-19 patients are not yet known. We searched PubMed, Embase Medline, Web of Science and MedRxiv using specific search terms in studies published from 1 January 2020 to 20 December 2020. In total, 33 studies, including 3073 cases and 6502 controls, were selected for meta-analysis. We found that immunosuppressant therapy significantly decreased mortality in COVID-19 patients on overall analysis (odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.57-0.89, p = 0.004). We also found that tocilizumab and anakinra significantly decreased mortality in patients without any increased risk of secondary infection. In addition, we found similar results in several subgroups. However, we found that tocilizumab therapy significantly increased the risk of fungal co-infections in COVID-19 patients. This represents the only systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and secondary infection risk of immunosuppressant treatment in COVID-19 patients. Overall, immunosuppressants significantly decreased mortality but had no effect on increased risk of secondary infections. Our analysis of tocilizumab therapy showed a significantly increased risk of fungal co-infections in these patients.

Anakinra-An Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus caused a global pandemic in 2019. There are limited pharmacologic options available. The Food and Drug Administration initiated an emergency use authorization process to expedite pharmacologic agents to treat COVID-19. There are several agents available through the emergency use authorization process, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, remdesivir, and baricitinib. Anakinra is an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist that exhibits properties in fighting against COVID-19. MECHANISM OF ACTION, PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND PHARMACOKINETICS: Anakinra is a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist. The epithelial cell damage that may occur with COVID-19 enhances the release of IL-1, which plays a central role in severe cases. Thus, drugs that inhibit the IL-1 receptor may be beneficial in the management of COVID-19. Anakinra has good bioavailability after subcutaneous injection and a half-life of up to 6 hours. CLINICAL TRIALS: The SAVE-MORE, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, phase 3 evaluated the efficacy and safety of anakinra. Anakinra 100 mg was given subcutaneously daily for up to 10 days in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 and plasma suPAR ≥6 ng/mL. Anakinra group had a 50.4% fully recovered with no viral RNA detected on day 28 versus 26.5% for placebo, and more than 50% of relative decrease in mortality. A significantly decreased risk of worse clinical outcome was observed. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCE: COVID-19 causes global pandemic and a serious viral disease. There are limited therapy options to combat this deadly disease. Anakinra is an IL-1 receptor antagonist and shown to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19 in some trials but not others. Anakinra, the first in this class, seems to have a mix result for the treatment of COVID-19.

Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-1 in children with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) therapies in colchicine-resistant pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 656 children with FMF and 27 patients who had been treated with anti-IL-1 therapies (anakinra/canakinumab) . Clinical and laboratory features, MEFV gene mutations, treatment responses were investigated. RESULTS: Twenty of the patients were treated with anakinra (the treatment of 6 patients who initially used anakinra was switched to canakinumab in the follow-up period), and 13 patients were treated with canakinumab. Clinical symptom and severity scores decreased in all patients A decrease in acute phase reactants was also observed in patients. A total of 18 (66%) patients had a M694V homozygous mutation, while 24 (89%) patients had a M694V mutation, at least in one allele. CONCLUSIONS: FMF patients with colchicine resistance may progress to amyloidosis. IL-1 antagonist treatment could be used safely with a favorable outcome in pediatric patients with FMF resistance to colchicine therapy and/or who have renal amyloidosis.

High-dose intravenous anakinra treatment is safe and effective in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a propensity score-matched study in a single center.

BACKGROUND: In COVID-19, severe disease course such as need of intensive care unit (ICU) as well as development of mortality is mainly due to cytokine storm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the high-dose intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with severe and critically ill COVID-19 compared to standard of care. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of two groups as follows: the patients receiving high-dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) between 01.09.2021 and 01.02.2022 and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC, control group) as historical control group who were hospitalized between 01.07.2021 and 01.09.2021. RESULTS: After the propensity score 1:1 matching, 79 patients in anakinra and 79 patients in SoC matched and were included into the analysis. Mean ± SD patient age was 67.4 ± 16.7 and 67.1 ± 16.3 years in anakinra and SoC groups, respectively (p = 0.9). Male gender was 38 (48.7%) in anakinra and 36 (46.2%) in SoC (p = 0.8). Overall, ICU admission was in 14.1% (n = 11) and 30.8% (n = 24) (p = 0.013; OR 6.2), intubation in 12.8% (n = 10) and 16.7% (n = 13) patients (p = 0.5), and 14.1% (n = 11) and 32.1% (n = 25) patients died in anakinra and control groups, respectively (p = 0.008; OR 7.1). CONCLUSION: In our study, mortality was lower in patients receiving anakinra compared to SoC. Intravenous high-dose anakinra is safe and effective treatment in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.

Inflammation as a chemoprevention target in asbestos-induced malignant mesothelioma.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an incurable cancer of the serosal lining that is often caused by exposure to asbestos. Therefore, novel agents for the prevention and treatment of this disease are urgently needed. Asbestos induces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1ß and IL-6, which play a role in MM development. IL-6 is a component of the JAK-STAT3 pathway that contributes to inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. Glycoprotein 130 (gp130), the signal transducer of this signaling axis, is an attractive drug target because of its role in promoting neoplasia via the activation of downstream STAT3 signaling. The anticancer drug, SC144, inhibits the interaction of gp130 with the IL-6 receptor (IL6R), effectively blunting signaling from this inflammatory axis. To test whether the inflammation-related release of IL-6 plays a role in the formation of MM, we evaluated the ability of SC144 to inhibit asbestos-induced carcinogenesis in a mouse model. The ability of sulindac and anakinra, an IL6R antagonist/positive control, to inhibit MM formation in this model was tested in parallel. Asbestos-exposed Nf2+/-;Cdkn2a+/- mice treated with SC144, sulindac or anakinra showed significantly prolonged survival compared to asbestos-exposed vehicle-treated mice. STAT3 activity was markedly decreased in MM specimens from SC144-treated mice. Furthermore, SC144 inhibited STAT3 activation by IL-6 in cultured normal mesothelial cells, and in vitro treatment of MM cells with SC144 markedly decreased the expression of STAT3 target genes. The emerging availability of newer, more potent SC144 analogs showing improved pharmacokinetic properties holds promise for future trials, benefitting individuals at high risk of this disease.

Spinal NLRP3 inflammasome activation mediates IL-1ß release and contributes to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia by regulating NMDA receptor NR1 subunit phosphorylation and GLT-1 expression in rats.

BACKGROUND: Trafficking and activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play an important role in initiating and maintaining postoperative remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH). Activation of the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has been linked to the development of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. We hypothesized that activation of NLRP3 inflammasome mediates IL-1ß release and contributes to RIH in rats by increasing NMDA receptor NR1 (NR1) subunit phosphorylation and decreasing glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1) expression. METHODS: Acute exposure to remifentanil (1.2 µg/kg/min for 60 min) was used to establish RIH in rats. Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia were tested at baseline (24 h before remifentanil infusion) and 2, 6, 24, and 48 h after remifentanil infusion. The levels of IL-1ß, GLT-1, phosphorylated NR1 (phospho-NR1), and NLRP3 inflammasome activation indicators [NLRP3, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), P2X purinoceptor 7 (P2X7R), and caspase-1] were measured after the last behavioral test. A selective IL-1ß inhibitor (IL-1ß inhibitor antagonist; IL-1ra) or three different selective NLRP3 inflammasome activation inhibitors [(+)-naloxone (a TLR4 inhibitor), A438079 (a P2X7R inhibitor), or ac-YVADcmk (a caspase-1 inhibitor)] were intrathecally administered immediately before remifentanil infusion into rats. RESULTS: Remifentanil induced significant postoperative hyperalgesia, increased IL-1ß and phospho-NR1 levels and activated the NLRP3 inflammasome by increasing TLR4, P2X7R, NLRP3, and caspase-1 expression, but it decreased GLT-1 expression in the L4-L6 spinal cord segments of rats, which was markedly improved by intrathecal administration of IL-1ra, (+)-naloxone, A438079, or ac-YVADcmk. CONCLUSION: NLRP3 inflammasome activation mediates IL-1ß release and contributes to RIH in rats by inducing NMDA receptor NR1 subunit phosphorylation and decreasing GLT-1 expression. Inhibiting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome may be an effective treatment for RIH.

Anakinra Treatment in Patients with Acute Kawasaki Disease with Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Phase I/IIa Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunomodulatory effects of 2-6 weeks of anakinra therapy in patients with acute Kawasaki disease with a coronary artery aneurysm (CAA). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a Phase I/IIa dose-escalation study of anakinra (2-11 mg/kg/day) in 22 patients with acute Kawasaki disease with CAA. We measured interleukin (IL)-1RA concentrations after the first dose and trough levels up to study week 6. Markers of inflammation and coronary artery z-scores were assessed pretreatment and at 48 hours, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Up to 6 weeks of anakinra (up to 11 mg/kg/day) was safe and well tolerated by the 22 participants (median age, 1.1 years), with no serious adverse events attributable to the study drug. All participants were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and 20 also received infliximab (10 mg/kg) before initiation of anakinra. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor α decreased similarly in patients with Kawasaki disease treated with IVIG, infliximab, and anakinra compared with age- and sex-matched patients with Kawasaki disease treated only with IVIG and infliximab. Anakinra clearance increased with illness day at diagnosis. Simulations demonstrated that more frequent intravenous (IV) dosing may result in more sustained concentrations without significantly increasing the peak concentration compared with subcutaneous (SC) dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Both IV and SC anakinra are safe in infants and children with acute Kawasaki disease and CAA. IV dosing every 8-12 hours during the acute hospitalization of patients with Kawasaki disease may result in a sustained concentration while avoiding frequent SC injections. The efficacy of a short course of IV therapy during hospitalization should be studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02179853.

Effect of IL-1 Blockade With Anakinra on Heart Failure Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Versus Nonanterior ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

ABSTRACT: Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at risk of future heart failure (HF), particularly those with anterior STEMI. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a key mediator of the inflammatory response, and its blockade has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent HF events. The aim of this analysis was to explore the effects of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, on HF outcomes based on anterior versus nonanterior location STEMI and to explore whether this effect is mediated through the amelioration of left ventricular systolic function and cardiac remodeling. We pooled data from 3 early phase randomized clinical trials. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and new-onset HF at 1-year follow-up. The left anterior descending coronary artery as culprit vessel was used to identify anterior STEMI. We included 139 patients, 47 (34%) with anterior STEMI and 92 (66%) with nonanterior STEMI. Anakinra significantly reduced the combined end point of death or new-onset HF in patients with anterior STEMI [4 (13%) vs. 7 (42%), log-rank P value = 0.049] and in patients with nonanterior STEMI [3 (6%) vs. 9 (24%), log-rank P value = 0.014]. We found no significant differences comparing anakinra versus placebo in interval changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in anterior and nonanterior STEMI. In conclusion, anakinra is associated with a reduction of HF events in patients with STEMI, irrespective of anterior or nonanterior location, or of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction or cardiac remodeling.

IL-1 inhibition in familial Mediterranean fever: clinical outcomes and expectations.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and serositis. Since 1972, colchicine is the drug of choice for FMF. It is effective in preventing the attacks and withholding amyloidosis in most patients with FMF. Colchicine blood and tissue levels are regulated by a glycoprotein pump (GLP) and by Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP450 3A4). It is secreted through the bile system and the kidneys. Over the years several problems have been raised following the use of colchicine in FMF. These include potential side effects (particularly gastrointestinal), non-compliance, inefficacy due to drug resistance, many drug-drug interactions and high risk for intoxication due to a narrow therapeutic range. In addition, colchicine does not prevent protracted febrile myalgia or exertional leg pain. Based upon our current understanding of the pathogenesis of FMF, it seems that anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) agents can solve many of the aforementioned problems related to colchicine therapy. The gastrointestinal side effects of colchicine are extremely uncommon with anti-IL-1 biologics. Drug-drug interactions are also unlikely, and their therapeutic window is not narrow. The once daily injection of anakinra, the once weekly injection of rilonacept, and the once monthly injection of canakinumab result in a better compliance to therapy. Nevertheless, there are no controlled trials showing the efficacy of anti-IL-1 agents in preventing amyloidosis or their safety in pregnancy. Therefore, it is still needed to give IL-1 blockers with concomitant colchicine in its tolerable dose effective in preventing amyloidosis (1.5 mg daily in adult).

Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine may potentially prevent FMF attacks. For people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab might be beneficial. This is an update of the review last published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with FMF. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and four Chinese databases on in August 2021. We searched clinical trials registries and references listed in relevant reports. The last search was 17 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with FMF, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, thalidomide, tocilizumab, interferon-α and ImmunoGuard (herbal dietary supplement)) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 RCTs with 312 participants (aged three to 53 years), including five parallel and five cross-over designed studies. Six studies used oral colchicine, one used oral ImmunoGuard, and the remaining three used rilonacept, anakinra or canakinumab as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to eight months. There were inadequacies in the design of the four older colchicine studies and the two studies comparing a single to a divided dose of colchicine. However, the four studies of ImmunoGuard, rilonacept, anakinra and canakinumab were generally well-designed.  We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis, adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack; but no study reported on the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis. Colchicine (oral) versus placebo After three months, colchicine 0.6 mg three times daily may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks (risk ratio (RR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.95; 1 study, 10 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study (20 participants) of colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily showed there may be no difference in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence), or in the number of days between attacks: (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, one study reported loose stools and frequent bowel movements and a second reported diarrhea (narrative summary; both very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on acute-phase response. Rilonacept versus placebo There is probably no difference in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.26; moderate-certainty evidence).  There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence) or in the number of days between attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the rilonacept study reported there may be no differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertension, headache, respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions and herpes, compared to placebo (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). The study narratively reported there may be no differences in acute-phase response indicators after three months (low-certainty evidence). ImmunoGuard versus placebo The ImmunoGuard study observed there are probably no differences in adverse effects (moderate-certainty evidence) or in acute-phase response indicators after one month of treatment (moderate-certainty evidence). No data were reported for the number of people experiencing an attack, duration of attacks or days between attacks. Anakinra versus placebo A study of anakinra given to 25 colchicine-resistant participants found there is probably no difference in the number of participants experiencing an attack at four months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.07; moderate-certainty evidence).  There were no data for duration of attacks or days between attacks. There are probably no differences between anakinra and placebo with regards to injection site reaction, headache, presyncope, dyspnea and itching (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, anakinra probably reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) after four months (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). Canakinumab versus placebo Canakinumab probably reduces the number of participants experiencing an attack at 16 weeks (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65; 1 study, 63 colchicine-resistant participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the duration of attacks or days between attacks. The included study reported the number of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years was probably 42.7 with canakinumab versus 97.4 with placebo among people with colchicine-resistant FMF (moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, canakinumab probably caused a higher proportion of participants to have a CRP level of 10 mg/L or less compared to placebo (68% with canakinumab versus 6% with placebo; 1 study, 63 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Colchicine single dose versus divided dose There is probably no difference in the duration of attacks at three months (MD -0.04 hours, 95% CI -10.91 to 10.83) or six months (MD 2.80 hours, 95% CI -5.39 to 10.99; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the number of participants experiencing an attack or days between attacks. There is probably no difference in adverse events (including anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting and elevated liver enzymes) between groups (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, there may be no evidence of a difference between groups (narrative summary; low- to moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited RCTs assessing interventions for people with FMF. Based on the evidence, three times daily colchicine may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, colchicine single dose and divided dose may not be different for children with FMF, canakinumab probably reduces the number of people experiencing attacks, and anakinra or canakinumab probably reduce CRP in colchicine-resistant participants; however, only a few RCTs contributed data for analysis. Further RCTs examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in FMF can be drawn.

Canakinumab is effective in patients with familial Mediterranean fever resistant and intolerant to the colchicine and/or anakinra treatment.

As an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disease, treatment of Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) has still gaps. Clinical studies are proving the safety and efficacy of colchicine in patients with FMF. However, there are very limited data on colchicine-resistant patients treated with canakinumab. This study presents the real-life experience of two rheumatology clinics choosing canakinumab in adult patients with FMF resistant to standard therapy. Treatment-resistant FMF patients with validated diagnoses enrolled from two rheumatology clinics. A special database was generated for the study and patients' demographic characteristics, FMF attack characteristics, adverse events seen during treatment, family history, MediterraneanFeVer (MEFV) mutations, and laboratory results recorded. Patients with missing dates were excluded from the analysis. PRAS score is used to assess the disease activity. A total of thirty colchicine and/or anakinra-resistant patients were enrolled to study. Twenty-one patients were female (70%) and the average disease duration was 21 years. The time from colchicine to anakinra was 4.27 years and the time to canakinumab was 1.52 years. Abdominal pain (100%), fever (93.3%), chest pain (56.7%) were the most prevailed findings. Morning stiffness, myalgia, low back pain, chest pain was the predominant musculoskeletal findings. Median colchicine dose was 2 mg/day (min-max 0.5-3 mg/day). The most common side effect during anakinra treatment, apart from treatment unresponsiveness, was injection site reactions. Before canakinumab treatment, the mean number of attacks was 8.3 in the 24 weeks, 4.33 in the third month of canakinumab treatment, and 1.56 at the last visit (p < 0.001). Also, the mean duration of attacks was 67.20 h before canakinumab treatment, this period decreased to 18.27 h after six months of canakinumab treatment (p < 0.001). Canakinumab is effective and tolerable to reduce attacks in resistant patients with FMF. Laboratory findings and clinical observation reveals that canakinumab can be another treatment option for colchicine and/or anakinra non-responders. Further studies with larger patients are required to validate recent findings with canakinumab.

Factors Affecting Response to Anakinra in Crystalline Arthritis Flares.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 1 inhibition with anakinra has shown efficacy in the management of crystalline-induced arthritis (CIA) flares. Gout treatment guidelines recommend its use after contraindication or intolerance to first-line therapies. The aim of this study is to identify features associated with better response to anakinra when used to treat CIA flares. METHODS: This is a medical record review study that included inpatients with acute CIA in whom anakinra was used between the years 2014 and 2019 at one tertiary center (University of Alabama at Birmingham). The primary end point was response to anakinra treatment defined as a decrease in the reported visual analog score of at least 50% within 48 hours of initiation of treatment. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors were compared, and factors found significant in bivariate analysis at a p value of less than 0.15 were tested in a multivariate logistic regression analysis for independent association with the response. RESULTS: A total of 55 admission encounters were analyzed. The mean age was 60.1 years, 36 (66%) were men, and 31 (56%) were African Americans. Twenty-eight of 49 (57%) met the primary end point of response at 48 hours, but 52 of 55 (94.5%) ultimately responded to anakinra during hospital stay. Factors associated with response at 48 hours were race, reason for admission related to cardiac etiologies, not having failed steroids before trial of anakinra, and hospital admission within 48 hours of initiation of flare. On a multivariable logistic regression model, we could not find significant independent associations with response to anakinra. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed high response rates to anakinra. We could not identify factors associated with a more robust, early response. It is likely that anakinra is equally effective across a wide range of clinical scenarios.

Long-term safety and efficacy of anakinra and canakinumab in patients with familial Mediterranean fever: a single-centre real-life study with 101 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Anakinra and canakinumab are the most commonly used agents in colchicine resistant/intolerant patients. In this study we investigated long-term efficacy and safety of anakinra and canakinumab. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 101 adult patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Clinical and laboratory parameters before and after treatment with anakinra/canakinumab and the side effects observed during the treatment were recorded. All patients received anakinra initially and switched to canakinumab, in case of inadequate response/intolerance. RESULTS: The median (IQR) duration of treatment with anti-IL-1 agents was 35 (24-47.5) months. 101 patients were treated with anakinra and 27 patients with canakinumab. The autoinflammatory diseases activity and attacks decreased with both anakinra and canakinumab. Anakinra was effective in decreasing proteinuria and canakinumab was not effective in decreasing proteinuria in anakinra unresponsive patients. The modified FMF score was achieved in 76.2% of anakinra and 88.9% of canakinumab group. Injection site reactions (ISRs, n:15) was the most common reason of discontinuation of anakinra and most of ISRs developed in first 3 months of treatment. One severe skin rash, two anaphylactic reactions and one severe neutropenia were observed with anakinra; in the first, eighth, twelfth and fiftieth months, respectively. No severe side effects or side effect-related discontinuation of canakinumab were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anakinra and canakinumab seem to be effective in long-term management of FMF patients. Canakinumab had a favourable safety/tolerability profile. Anakinra is also generally safe, but the serious side effects that may be observed in the short and long-term use should be taken into account.